Not gonna lie, it can make for some pretty hilarious moments online.

Generally speaking though I prefer it off... or like in certain Gun Game servers in CS where friendly fire is activated after a certain point in the game.

Needs more grass and blood, but makes it up with exclusive free DLC, you lucky PS3 fanboys!:x

mitu123

That's the whole reason why the PS3 version is getting the DLC in the first place, same story as RDR.

Can they just hurry up and make a non-mmo game where you can build stuff.

[QUOTE="the_mitch28"]At the end of the day it's better to play a fun mindless shooter than it is to play a crap one. These are games after all.THA-TODD-BEAST

Were you trying to make a point somewhere here? Doom is a mindless shooter, and it's better than the majority of games released today. But that's not the point, nor does it have anything to do with this discussion. Neither Modern Warfare or Bad Company are crap shooters. Bad Company 2 is just the deeper game, and in my opinion has done far more in regards to taking multiplayer shooters past their limits than any of the rehashed Call of Duty games ever have. I not once said any of these games are horrible. This is more about the pricing than anything else ($60 for a rehash, whereas Bad Company 2 is cheaper gives us PC gamers an experience we've never seen before).

What has BC2 done that's so impressive? It's like a smaller worse version of BF2 with scripted semi destructible environments and a lack luster campaign.

And wasn't trying to make a point I was just saying personally I would rather play a fun game (CoD) than a crap frustrating game (BC2).

[QUOTE="MyopicCanadian"]You can say DICE gave it their all, but at the end of the day.. I uninstalled BC2, I'm done with it, and yet I'm still playing MW1 and MW2. But oh wait, I must just be a stupid lemming... it's not like I made that choice for myself or I'm just playing the games I like or anything.THA-TODD-BEAST

I'm still not sure you even understand what I'm saying. My point is not that Call of Duty is a terrible series, but rather that paying $60 for nothing more than a re-skin is something only lemmings do. The games have shown few-to-no improvements from one Modern Warfare-esque game to the next, and the fact that they're charging full price while making so few changes to the formula is ridiculous. Much of what I'm seeing could easily be coming in the form of Download Content or expansion packs. In comparison, Bad Company 2 offers far more new things and emphasizes more teamwork and tactics than Modern Warfare, and that's why I was saying it's the superior game in regards to its depth and teamplay. Modern Warfare is an "idiot's shooter" in which you run around like, well, an idiot, killing enemies in sight with no real objective in mind unless you're on one of the few maps that doesn't involve meeting a score or time criteria. Because I know you'll take this the wrong way, too, I'm not calling you an idiot if you enjoy the game. What I mean by "idiot's shooter" is that it takes no more thought than seeing someone, getting them in your sights, and pulling the trigger. There is no recoil to worry about, no teamwork to be concerned with, and few to no objectives to meet. It's a shooter made for simpletons.

Oh come off it. A reskin? Please. Think about any games series, few of them change substantially from iteration to iteration, including your beloved battlefield series. Changing the CoD formula is like changing the CS formula... very tricky thing to do.

Also I love how you're tying to make out like BC2 players are of a higher class and taste than those who play CoD, perhaps people prefer CoD because it's a fun game (yes I said it) and BC2 isn't. As much as I love dealing with horrible sluggish controls, poor hit detection and 'teamwork' in public matches I think I'd rather just save myself the frustration and play CoD.

At the end of the day it's better to play a fun mindless shooter than it is to play a crap one. These are games after all.

Looking really fun so far, can't wait. Dedicated servers and Zombies? Hells yeah.

Its not like its easy mode with snipers, in most games sniping is harder than using assault rifles/SMGs.

If you're in a game where a sniper is on top of the ladder chances are your team isn't very good or they're just pro.

Eh Starcraft and Warcraft initially started out as ripoffs of WH and 40k, there was even a law suit I believe... or came close to one at least.

And at any rate no I would not like to see this happen, if anything the 40k RTS games need to get bigger and more epic something that I don't think Blizzard could pull off. Also dirt farming isn't really something that belongs in a 40k game.

I know Relic has the Warhammer 40k licence but hopefully another dev can get a hold of the Epic 40k licence.

CS:S by far.

Got it for $50 before they upped the price :)