Yeah land battles killed it and space battles were no homeworld 2

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]

Buy it for the 360. It's the best version out of the two. I'm not sure that it's coming to PC.

Rockstar said that no PC version is planned for now.

FelipeInside

Better graphics and better framerate on the 360 version, you'll find this with most multiplat release games.

Anyway RDR is probably the best game to come out this year so far, so if you were on the fence about getting a console for these types of releases then this should definitely tilt you over.

As long as you remember your log in details.

Judging by your sig it would seem you have a PS3, maybe the easiest thing to do is just to go out and purchase the PS3 copy of the game?

The actual gameplay looks very bland and generic, I trust Kevin when he says the story is interesting but it's not very fun to play in between story segments.

Driver . The open world driving game ever and still no sequel?

adamosmaki

What about Driver 2, Driver 3 or Driver: Parallel lines?

[QUOTE="therancors"][QUOTE="Rheorin"] Yeah, and according to that, it's almost twice as big as World of Warcraft. That I do not believe.Makari

edit: Yeah, thinking about it - I'm inserting the Burnout vehicles in WoW's map, mentally. I'm pretty sure they could clear the entirety of Stormwind in one jump or drive the Deeprun Tram in what, 10-15 seconds if they're going flat-out? The cars in Burnout are *fast.*

Yeah but look at the size of it compared to GTA:SA, you could drive and fly very fast in that game and it felt bigger than BP yet it's not even a 4th the size.

Also I just remembered another game, Test Drive Unlimited. A whole Hawaiian island

What? No... Bodies are flapping around, they can be hurled through the air with a shotgun of about 20 feet, the ammo/medic packs slide as if they're on ice, the only good physics really is the building collapsing. Anarchist-TKC-1

That's script based destruction, Red Faction Guerrilla is an example of physics based destruction.

A lot of people seem to think that I am braging about BFBC2's physics... I'm not. I know this game has a poor physics engine and the destruction is also very scripted (even though the destruction of the ground impresses me). If you guys were to watch the video that I posted, you would know that it shows how "crazy" the physics are. They have tanks flying way off in the distance and other crazy things.

arto1223

Sorry I didn't mean you specifically, just I've seen in other threads people commending the game for its fantastic physics.

Maybe check out Sword of the Stars. It's turn based when building and moving between planets but the battles are in real time and in some respects more impressive than sins.

Oh and I found this.

Suffca

Wow burnout paradise did not feel that big at all.

But yeah FSX has the whole planet so it wins out.