widdowson91's comments

Avatar image for widdowson91
widdowson91

1249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

239

Followers

Reviews: 149

User Lists: 7

Edited By widdowson91

@Trickedoutps3: Yeah I hope so. I love the Wii, but they have loads of rubbish party games on it. We need more proper first party games on the Wii. Metroid Prime 3 showed us that the main games in Nintendo's catalogue can work fantastically well with the Wii remote.

Avatar image for widdowson91
widdowson91

1249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

239

Followers

Reviews: 149

User Lists: 7

Edited By widdowson91

@eal-zubieri: Mario and Zelda games are miles better than anything the PS3 has to offer. Look I love Uncharted (I haven't played the second one so I can't comment on that) but Uncharted was just at heart a bog standard shooter, with clear set paths you had to follow. I know the 2D mario games were like this, but they are addictive and the 3D Mario games and all Zelda games are completely free roaming, mening the games have more to them. No game on a Sony console except Final Fantasy VII can compete with games made by Nintendo themselves. Anyway the PlayStation Move will never beat the Wii.

Avatar image for widdowson91
widdowson91

1249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

239

Followers

Reviews: 149

User Lists: 7

Edited By widdowson91

@Kratos2030: Please tell me how the PS3 is now going to beat the Wii? The Wii has more than double the world wide sales that the PS3 does, and some tacked on motion controller isn't going to change that. Honestly, I'm not a massive fan of Motion Sensor gaming, but I love nintendo and I stuck by them and they pulled it off, but the Wii is a Motion Sensor system and that's why it works great, the PS3 will suck at it. Until the PS3 has games that can rival Mario and Zelda the Wii won't be beat.

Avatar image for widdowson91
widdowson91

1249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

239

Followers

Reviews: 149

User Lists: 7

Edited By widdowson91

I can't see why Sony have bothered with the PlayStation Move. Well I do know why, it's to try and compete with the Wii, but really what's going to be better, the PlayStation Move or the Wii's Motion Sensor controller? Erm... the Wii's. This is simply down to the fact that the Wii was built for motion sensor gaming and the PS3 wasn't, it's just tacked on. Now people will say that the Wii lacks HD and the PS3 has it, but I don't care. Nintendo don't need hD graphics because Nintendo make the best games, no games on the PS3 can compete with Mario or Zelda, and when these games have motion sensor controls iot makes them even better than the PS3 games. Sony are doing this simply to make more money, but they shouldn't bother as it'll flop, just like PlayStation Home and the PSP Go.

Avatar image for widdowson91
widdowson91

1249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

239

Followers

Reviews: 149

User Lists: 7

Edited By widdowson91

The PS3 has a better graphics card that the XBox 360, but both can only be displayed at a maximum of 1080p on a HD TV so they won't be different. Wait until a TV with better HD capabilities that 1080p is released and they you'll see that the PS3 can surpass that and the XBox 360 will struggle to. And is also depends on the game, Assasins Creed 2 for instance is on both so the graphics won't be different, you should compare between a 360 only game and a PS3 only game, like Gears Of War 2 and Uncharted 2.