Are you pro-life or pro-choice?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Animatronic64
Animatronic64

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#301 Animatronic64
Member since 2010 • 3971 Posts

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"][QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]Racer, keep in mind you're arguing with people that don't even acknowledge that a baby in the first trimester, with a heart-beat and well defined human-shape is a person.

racer8dan

Keep in mind, I'm also the guy that doesn't support abortion after 8 weeks.

Why not?

Because it has formed into what looks exactly like a human fetus. Either way, I don't condone abortion. Rather, I wish people were more educated, and perhaps get the baby, despite all odds, and raise it right. But I believe the choice should remain.

Avatar image for grape_of_wrath
grape_of_wrath

3756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#302 grape_of_wrath
Member since 2009 • 3756 Posts

[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]That's a ridiculous argument. Sperm alone has 0% potential to become a human being

racer8dan

Racer, keep in mind you're arguing with people that don't even acknowledge that a baby in the first trimester, with a heart-beat and well defined human-shape is a person.

Yeah, it's like beating a dead horse.

Don't you think this whole discussion is arbitrary and frivolous to begin with? When everything hinges on personal moral perception, how, exactly, do you mean to convince the other side of your point?
Avatar image for deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
deactivated-5cacc9e03b460

6976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#303 deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
Member since 2005 • 6976 Posts

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"] Keep in mind, I'm also the guy that doesn't support abortion after 8 weeks. Animatronic64

Why not?

Because it has formed into what looks exactly like a human fetus. Either way, I don't condone abortion. Rather, I wish people were more educated, and perhaps get the baby, despite all odds, and raise it right. But I believe the choice should remain.

The first pic looks exactly like a human fetus too at that time period...?

Avatar image for Animatronic64
Animatronic64

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#304 Animatronic64
Member since 2010 • 3971 Posts
[QUOTE="racer8dan"]

[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]Why not?

grape_of_wrath

Because it has formed into what looks exactly like a human fetus. Either way, I don't condone abortion. Rather, I wish people were more educated, and perhaps get the baby, despite all odds, and raise it right. But I believe the choice should remain.

The first pic looks exactly like a human fetus too at that time period...?

http://www.exploratorium.edu/exhibits/embryo/embryoflash.html Knowledge.
Avatar image for deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
deactivated-5cacc9e03b460

6976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#305 deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
Member since 2005 • 6976 Posts

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]

[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]Racer, keep in mind you're arguing with people that don't even acknowledge that a baby in the first trimester, with a heart-beat and well defined human-shape is a person.

grape_of_wrath

Yeah, it's like beating a dead horse.

Don't you think this whole discussion is arbitrary and frivolous to begin with? When everything hinges on personal moral perception, how, exactly, do you mean to convince the other side of your point?

Contrary to the popular beleif, people's opinions can be changed, whether they admit it or not.

Avatar image for Animatronic64
Animatronic64

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#306 Animatronic64
Member since 2010 • 3971 Posts

[QUOTE="grape_of_wrath"][QUOTE="racer8dan"]Yeah, it's like beating a dead horse.

racer8dan

Don't you think this whole discussion is arbitrary and frivolous to begin with? When everything hinges on personal moral perception, how, exactly, do you mean to convince the other side of your point?

Contrary to the popular beleif, people's opinions can be changed, whether they admit it or not.

You're doing a hell of a job of changing mine.
Avatar image for grape_of_wrath
grape_of_wrath

3756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#307 grape_of_wrath
Member since 2009 • 3756 Posts

[QUOTE="grape_of_wrath"][QUOTE="racer8dan"] Because it has formed into what looks exactly like a human fetus. Either way, I don't condone abortion. Rather, I wish people were more educated, and perhaps get the baby, despite all odds, and raise it right. But I believe the choice should remain.

Animatronic64

The first pic looks exactly like a human fetus too at that time period...?

http://www.exploratorium.edu/exhibits/embryo/embryoflash.html Knowledge.

?

Avatar image for deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
deactivated-5cacc9e03b460

6976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#308 deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
Member since 2005 • 6976 Posts

[QUOTE="grape_of_wrath"][QUOTE="racer8dan"] Because it has formed into what looks exactly like a human fetus. Either way, I don't condone abortion. Rather, I wish people were more educated, and perhaps get the baby, despite all odds, and raise it right. But I believe the choice should remain.

Animatronic64

The first pic looks exactly like a human fetus too at that time period...?

http://www.exploratorium.edu/exhibits/embryo/embryoflash.html Knowledge.

What exactly does this have to do with anything:? You showed me a picture of the human fetus at a month, it's human, and it's a fetus whether it meets your perception of what a baby is suppose to look like or not. And whether people are able to recognize it as human from animal or not.

Avatar image for Planet_Pluto
Planet_Pluto

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#309 Planet_Pluto
Member since 2011 • 2235 Posts

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]

[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"] Keep in mind, I'm also the guy that doesn't support abortion after 8 weeks. Animatronic64

During the sonogram at +/- 3 weeks, we heard our child's heartbeat. Someone stopping that heart from beating at 7 1/2 weeks, a saint does not make.

Look at imagines. I edited my post.

Our kid was born a little bit over two weeks ago. I'm VERY familiar with what a fetus/baby looks like every step of the way. I'm not exactly sure what your point is. Are you saying it depends on a person's appearance at a particular stage in development? If that is the case, you would have no problem with me calling a Rodent Control Specialist to take-out Representative Henry Waxman.

Avatar image for Animatronic64
Animatronic64

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#310 Animatronic64
Member since 2010 • 3971 Posts

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"][QUOTE="grape_of_wrath"]The first pic looks exactly like a human fetus too at that time period...?grape_of_wrath
http://www.exploratorium.edu/exhibits/embryo/embryoflash.html Knowledge.

?

And this is why no one takes you pro-lifers seriously. Your inability to distinguishes the difference between stages of the development of life. You just believe life begins at conception. You think your morals stand on some kind of unshakable pedestal and that everything else is wrong. Why do I even bother? Like the other guy said: "it's like beating a dead horse."

But then again, who cares? You pro life people won't get your way in the end. That's what makes me sleep well at night.

Avatar image for Planet_Pluto
Planet_Pluto

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#311 Planet_Pluto
Member since 2011 • 2235 Posts

[QUOTE="grape_of_wrath"][QUOTE="Animatronic64"] Knowledge. Animatronic64

?

And this is why no one takes you pro-lifers seriously. Your inability to distinguishes the difference between stages of the development of life. You just believe life begins at conception. You think your morals stand on some kind of unshakable pedestal and that everything else is wrong. Why do I even bother? Like the other guy said: "it's like beating a dead horse."

But then again, who cares? You pro life people won't get your way in the end. That's what makes me sleep well at night.

Yeah, you're right. Two people throwing caution to the wind, being irresponsible for a little shagging, then terminating a person is the moral high-ground. Thank you for enlightening us.

Avatar image for Animatronic64
Animatronic64

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#312 Animatronic64
Member since 2010 • 3971 Posts

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]

[QUOTE="grape_of_wrath"]?Planet_Pluto

And this is why no one takes you pro-lifers seriously. Your inability to distinguishes the difference between stages of the development of life. You just believe life begins at conception. You think your morals stand on some kind of unshakable pedestal and that everything else is wrong. Why do I even bother? Like the other guy said: "it's like beating a dead horse."

But then again, who cares? You pro life people won't get your way in the end. That's what makes me sleep well at night.

Yeah, you're right. Two people throwing caution to the wind, being irresponsible for a little shagging, then terminating a person is the moral high-ground. Thank you for enlightening us.

Yeah, because that's the sole reason for abortion. Thanks for enlightening us.
Avatar image for grape_of_wrath
grape_of_wrath

3756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#313 grape_of_wrath
Member since 2009 • 3756 Posts

And this is why no one takes you pro-lifers seriously. Your inability to distinguishes the difference between stages of the development of life. You just believe life begins at conception. You think your morals stand on some kind of unshakable pedestal and that everything else is wrong. Why do I even bother? Like the other guy said: "it's like beating a dead horse."

But then again, who cares? You pro life people won't get your way in the end. That's what makes me sleep well at night.

Animatronic64

wtf are you even talking about and who are you referring it to?

Your inability to distinguishes the difference...

Animatronic64

^.^

Avatar image for Planet_Pluto
Planet_Pluto

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#314 Planet_Pluto
Member since 2011 • 2235 Posts

[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"] And this is why no one takes you pro-lifers seriously. Your inability to distinguishes the difference between stages of the development of life. You just believe life begins at conception. You think your morals stand on some kind of unshakable pedestal and that everything else is wrong. Why do I even bother? Like the other guy said: "it's like beating a dead horse."

But then again, who cares? You pro life people won't get your way in the end. That's what makes me sleep well at night.

Animatronic64

Yeah, you're right. Two people throwing caution to the wind, being irresponsible for a little shagging, then terminating a person is the moral high-ground. Thank you for enlightening us.

Yeah, because that's the sole reason for abortion. Thanks for enlightening us.

Not the sole. The primary.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
deactivated-5cacc9e03b460

6976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#315 deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
Member since 2005 • 6976 Posts

[QUOTE="grape_of_wrath"][QUOTE="Animatronic64"] Knowledge. Animatronic64

?

And this is why no one takes you pro-lifers seriously. Your inability to distinguishes the difference between stages of the development of life. You just believe life begins at conception. You think your morals stand on some kind of unshakable pedestal and that everything else is wrong. Why do I even bother? Like the other guy said: "it's like beating a dead horse."

But then again, who cares? You pro life people won't get your way in the end. That's what makes me sleep well at night.

This is laughable coming from a guy who determines whether or not it's ok to abort based on appearance.

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#316 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

[QUOTE="grape_of_wrath"][QUOTE="Animatronic64"] Animatronic64

?

And this is why no one takes you pro-lifers seriously. Your inability to distinguishes the difference between stages of the development of life. You just believe life begins at conception. You think your morals stand on some kind of unshakable pedestal and that everything else is wrong. Why do I even bother? Like the other guy said: "it's like beating a dead horse."

But then again, who cares? You pro life people won't get your way in the end. That's what makes me sleep well at night.

This is true, luckily I live in a country where religion does not have a strong foot hold so Pro-choice will always be the majority view.

Most of the pro-life people also seem to have religious convictions which clouds the issue.

Important decisions like this should be based on current logical thinking not religious dogma imo.

Avatar image for Planet_Pluto
Planet_Pluto

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#317 Planet_Pluto
Member since 2011 • 2235 Posts

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]

[QUOTE="grape_of_wrath"]?tenaka2

And this is why no one takes you pro-lifers seriously. Your inability to distinguishes the difference between stages of the development of life. You just believe life begins at conception. You think your morals stand on some kind of unshakable pedestal and that everything else is wrong. Why do I even bother? Like the other guy said: "it's like beating a dead horse."

But then again, who cares? You pro life people won't get your way in the end. That's what makes me sleep well at night.

This is true, luckily I live in a country where religion does not have a strong foot hold so Pro-choice will always be the majority view.

Most of the pro-life people also seem to have religious convictions which clouds the issue.

Important decisions like this should be based on current logical thinking not religious dogma imo.

Who mentioned religion?

Avatar image for Animatronic64
Animatronic64

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#318 Animatronic64
Member since 2010 • 3971 Posts

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]

[QUOTE="grape_of_wrath"]?racer8dan

And this is why no one takes you pro-lifers seriously. Your inability to distinguishes the difference between stages of the development of life. You just believe life begins at conception. You think your morals stand on some kind of unshakable pedestal and that everything else is wrong. Why do I even bother? Like the other guy said: "it's like beating a dead horse."

But then again, who cares? You pro life people won't get your way in the end. That's what makes me sleep well at night.

This is laughable coming from a guy who determines whether or not it's ok to abort based on appearance.

What if you're fetus had serious deformities, though? Think about that. That would be an abortion based on appearance. There are many reasons for abortion. The one I have problem with are the most careless. You know, I can relate to some things you say. But I can't fully agree that it is right to strip away choice from people.
Avatar image for deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
deactivated-5cacc9e03b460

6976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#319 deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
Member since 2005 • 6976 Posts

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]

[QUOTE="grape_of_wrath"]?tenaka2

And this is why no one takes you pro-lifers seriously. Your inability to distinguishes the difference between stages of the development of life. You just believe life begins at conception. You think your morals stand on some kind of unshakable pedestal and that everything else is wrong. Why do I even bother? Like the other guy said: "it's like beating a dead horse."

But then again, who cares? You pro life people won't get your way in the end. That's what makes me sleep well at night.

This is true, luckily I live in a country where religion does not have a strong foot hold so Pro-choice will always be the majority view.

Most of the pro-life people also seem to have religious convictions which clouds the issue.

Important decisions like this should be based on current logical thinking not religious dogma imo.

What seems logical to me is, everyone should have a right to life. It's a basic human right and has nothing to do with religion.

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#320 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

Who mentioned religion?

Planet_Pluto

I did, there is a strong correlation between religion and pro-live, obviously this isn't always the case, yet it is apparent.

Avatar image for Animatronic64
Animatronic64

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#321 Animatronic64
Member since 2010 • 3971 Posts

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"] And this is why no one takes you pro-lifers seriously. Your inability to distinguishes the difference between stages of the development of life. You just believe life begins at conception. You think your morals stand on some kind of unshakable pedestal and that everything else is wrong. Why do I even bother? Like the other guy said: "it's like beating a dead horse."

But then again, who cares? You pro life people won't get your way in the end. That's what makes me sleep well at night.

racer8dan

This is true, luckily I live in a country where religion does not have a strong foot hold so Pro-choice will always be the majority view.

Most of the pro-life people also seem to have religious convictions which clouds the issue.

Important decisions like this should be based on current logical thinking not religious dogma imo.

What seem logical to me is, everyone should have a right to life. It's a basic human right and has nothing to do with religion.

A basic "human right." Where does this right come from? If we lived in a society that was completely pro-choice, that right would only be granted at a certain point in pregnancy. It's not a universal right. It's not a god given right. It's just a human idea. There is no divinity enforcing it.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
deactivated-5cacc9e03b460

6976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#322 deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
Member since 2005 • 6976 Posts

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"] And this is why no one takes you pro-lifers seriously. Your inability to distinguishes the difference between stages of the development of life. You just believe life begins at conception. You think your morals stand on some kind of unshakable pedestal and that everything else is wrong. Why do I even bother? Like the other guy said: "it's like beating a dead horse."

But then again, who cares? You pro life people won't get your way in the end. That's what makes me sleep well at night.

Animatronic64

This is laughable coming from a guy who determines whether or not it's ok to abort based on appearance.

What if you're fetus had serious deformities, though? Think about that. That would be an abortion based on appearance. There are many reasons for abortion. The one I have problem with are the most careless. You know, I can relate to some things you say. But I can't fully agree that it is right to strip away choice from people.

That shouldn't hold any weight on the subject. We should all have equall rights to life, which should include the unborn. Why are we stripping the baby's choice?

Avatar image for Planet_Pluto
Planet_Pluto

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#323 Planet_Pluto
Member since 2011 • 2235 Posts

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

This is true, luckily I live in a country where religion does not have a strong foot hold so Pro-choice will always be the majority view.

Most of the pro-life people also seem to have religious convictions which clouds the issue.

Important decisions like this should be based on current logical thinking not religious dogma imo.

Animatronic64

What seem logical to me is, everyone should have a right to life. It's a basic human right and has nothing to do with religion.

A basic "human right." Where does this right come from? If we lived in a society that was completely pro-choice, that right would only be granted at a certain point in pregnancy. It's not a universal right. It's not a god given right. It's just a human idea. There is no divinity enforcing it.

Racer is fully capable for himself, but I think what he's getting at is that if you feel/think/believe that you have a right to not be killed as of right now (in your present stage of life), then the unborn have the right to not be killed.

Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#324 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts
I'm pro-choice and not anti-abortion, I think it is absolutely ridiculous for the other stance to be pro-life. Most people, those for and against abortions, are pro-life.
Avatar image for deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
deactivated-5cacc9e03b460

6976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#325 deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
Member since 2005 • 6976 Posts

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]What seem logical to me is, everyone should have a right to life. It's a basic human right and has nothing to do with religion.

Planet_Pluto

A basic "human right." Where does this right come from? If we lived in a society that was completely pro-choice, that right would only be granted at a certain point in pregnancy. It's not a universal right. It's not a god given right. It's just a human idea. There is no divinity enforcing it.

Racer is fully capable for himself, but I think what he's getting at is that if you feel/think/believe that you have a right to not be killed as of right now (in your present stage of life), then the unborn have the right to not be killed.

That's a good way of describing it, yes.

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#326 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
I'm pro-choice and not anti-abortion, I think it is absolutely ridiculous for the other stance to be pro-life. Most people, those for and against abortions, are pro-life.SaintLeonidas
That's why many people call them "anti-choice" instead.
Avatar image for Animatronic64
Animatronic64

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#327 Animatronic64
Member since 2010 • 3971 Posts

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"][QUOTE="racer8dan"]This is laughable coming from a guy who determines whether or not it's ok to abort based on appearance.

racer8dan

What if you're fetus had serious deformities, though? Think about that. That would be an abortion based on appearance. There are many reasons for abortion. The one I have problem with are the most careless. You know, I can relate to some things you say. But I can't fully agree that it is right to strip away choice from people.

That shouldn't hold any weight on the subject. We should all have equall rights to life, which should include the unborn. Why are we stripping the baby's choice?

We are stripping the choice because it has no opinions to say otherwise. Eradicating it or letting it live will not make a difference to it in the end. Do you even remember being in your mothers womb? What do you remember before being born? What does it matter? If you never existed, why would you care, and how could you possibly care? And why does an 8 week old pregnancy deserve the same "right" to life as someone who has already been born? Like I said before, I don't condone the practice. But **** happens.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
deactivated-5cacc9e03b460

6976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#328 deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
Member since 2005 • 6976 Posts

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]What if you're fetus had serious deformities, though? Think about that. That would be an abortion based on appearance. There are many reasons for abortion. The one I have problem with are the most careless. You know, I can relate to some things you say. But I can't fully agree that it is right to strip away choice from people. Animatronic64

That shouldn't hold any weight on the subject. We should all have equall rights to life, which should include the unborn. Why are we stripping the baby's choice?

We are stripping the choice because it has no opinions to say otherwise. Eradicating it or letting it live will not make a difference to it in the end. Do you even remember being in your mothers womb? What do you remember before being born? What does it matter? If you never existed, why would you care, and how could you possibly care? And why does an 8 week old pregnancy deserve the same "right" to life as someone who has already been born? Like I said before, I don't condone the practice. But **** happens.

What about a 1 year olds choice? Does it have an opinion? Do you remember being a 1 year old? Do you think a baby one minute before birth has a right to life as a baby just born does?

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#329 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"][QUOTE="racer8dan"]This is laughable coming from a guy who determines whether or not it's ok to abort based on appearance.

racer8dan

What if you're fetus had serious deformities, though? Think about that. That would be an abortion based on appearance. There are many reasons for abortion. The one I have problem with are the most careless. You know, I can relate to some things you say. But I can't fully agree that it is right to strip away choice from people.

That shouldn't hold any weight on the subject. We should all have equall rights to life, which should include the unborn. Why are we stripping the baby's choice?

Its not a baby until its born it is also unable to make choices.

Avatar image for Planet_Pluto
Planet_Pluto

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#330 Planet_Pluto
Member since 2011 • 2235 Posts

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]What if you're fetus had serious deformities, though? Think about that. That would be an abortion based on appearance. There are many reasons for abortion. The one I have problem with are the most careless. You know, I can relate to some things you say. But I can't fully agree that it is right to strip away choice from people. tenaka2

That shouldn't hold any weight on the subject. We should all have equall rights to life, which should include the unborn. Why are we stripping the baby's choice?

Its not a baby until its born it is also unable to make choices.

So it's ok to "terminate" a not-baby a few days before mommy goes into labor?

Avatar image for Animatronic64
Animatronic64

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#331 Animatronic64
Member since 2010 • 3971 Posts

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]That shouldn't hold any weight on the subject. We should all have equall rights to life, which should include the unborn. Why are we stripping the baby's choice?

racer8dan

We are stripping the choice because it has no opinions to say otherwise. Eradicating it or letting it live will not make a difference to it in the end. Do you even remember being in your mothers womb? What do you remember before being born? What does it matter? If you never existed, why would you care, and how could you possibly care? And why does an 8 week old pregnancy deserve the same "right" to life as someone who has already been born? Like I said before, I don't condone the practice. But **** happens.

What about a 1 year olds choice? Does it have an opinion? Do you remember being a 1 year old? Do you think a baby one minute before birth has a right to life as a baby just born does?

But he or she has already been born. Separated from his or her mother, as its own entity. Sure, if a mother is not there to nurture and feed the baby, the baby will die. But how can you compare the two? They are completely different. One has a brain that processes emotion, and the other does not.

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#332 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]That shouldn't hold any weight on the subject. We should all have equall rights to life, which should include the unborn. Why are we stripping the baby's choice?

Planet_Pluto

Its not a baby until its born it is also unable to make choices.

So it's ok to "terminate" a not-baby a few days before mommy goes into labor?

No its illegal to do so, there is a limit up on till which time an abortion can take place after which the mommy to be can no longer terminate the fetus.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
deactivated-5cacc9e03b460

6976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#333 deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
Member since 2005 • 6976 Posts

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]We are stripping the choice because it has no opinions to say otherwise. Eradicating it or letting it live will not make a difference to it in the end. Do you even remember being in your mothers womb? What do you remember before being born? What does it matter? If you never existed, why would you care, and how could you possibly care? And why does an 8 week old pregnancy deserve the same "right" to life as someone who has already been born? Like I said before, I don't condone the practice. But **** happens.

Animatronic64

What about a 1 year olds choice? Does it have an opinion? Do you remember being a 1 year old? Do you think a baby one minute before birth has a right to life as a baby just born does?

But he or she has already been born. Separated from his or her mother, as its own entity. Sure, if a mother is not there to nurture and feed the baby, the baby will die. But how can you compare the two? They are completely different. One has a brain that processes emotion, and the other does not.

What if a freshly birthed baby is put back in it's mothers womb? Should it's rights be revoked? A baby a minute before being born is no different than a fresh born baby.

Avatar image for Planet_Pluto
Planet_Pluto

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#334 Planet_Pluto
Member since 2011 • 2235 Posts

[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

Its not a baby until its born it is also unable to make choices.

tenaka2

So it's ok to "terminate" a not-baby a few days before mommy goes into labor?

No its illegal to do so, there is a limit up on till which time an abortion can take place after which the mommy to be can no longer terminate the fetus.

Laws change all the time. Abortion itself wasn't always legal in the same ways it is now. I'm asking for YOUR thoughts on the matter.

Avatar image for Animatronic64
Animatronic64

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#335 Animatronic64
Member since 2010 • 3971 Posts

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]What about a 1 year olds choice? Does it have an opinion? Do you remember being a 1 year old? Do you think a baby one minute before birth has a right to life as a baby just born does?

racer8dan

But he or she has already been born. Separated from his or her mother, as its own entity. Sure, if a mother is not there to nurture and feed the baby, the baby will die. But how can you compare the two? They are completely different. One has a brain that processes emotion, and the other does not.

What if a freshly birthed baby is put back in it's mothers womb? Should it's rights be revoked? A baby a minute before being born is no different than a fresh born baby.

I'm sorry, but that's probably the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, concerning abortion. :lol:

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#336 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts

What if a freshly birthed baby is put back in it's mothers womb? Should it's rights be revoked? A baby a minute before being born is no different than a fresh born baby.

racer8dan
If that happened, perhaps the doctor should be aborted.
Avatar image for Planet_Pluto
Planet_Pluto

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#337 Planet_Pluto
Member since 2011 • 2235 Posts

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]But he or she has already been born. Separated from his or her mother, as its own entity. Sure, if a mother is not there to nurture and feed the baby, the baby will die. But how can you compare the two? They are completely different. One has a brain that processes emotion, and the other does not.

Animatronic64

What if a freshly birthed baby is put back in it's mothers womb? Should it's rights be revoked? A baby a minute before being born is no different than a fresh born baby.

I'm sorry, but that's probably the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, concerning abortion. :lol:

I'm thinking that maybe a better example would be a premature baby that is born and placed immediately in an incubator.

Avatar image for Animatronic64
Animatronic64

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#338 Animatronic64
Member since 2010 • 3971 Posts

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]What if a freshly birthed baby is put back in it's mothers womb? Should it's rights be revoked? A baby a minute before being born is no different than a fresh born baby.

Planet_Pluto

I'm sorry, but that's probably the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, concerning abortion. :lol:

I'm thinking that maybe a better example would be a premature baby that is born and placed immediately in an incubator.

Isn't that a good thing? Trying to save a baby? Usually when one ends up being born pre-mature, there's health problems involved. My friend who has born that way initially had major health issues. Fortunately, he lived.
Avatar image for Planet_Pluto
Planet_Pluto

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#339 Planet_Pluto
Member since 2011 • 2235 Posts

[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]I'm sorry, but that's probably the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, concerning abortion. :lol:

Animatronic64

I'm thinking that maybe a better example would be a premature baby that is born and placed immediately in an incubator.

Isn't that a good thing? Trying to save a baby? Usually when one ends up being born pre-mature, there's health problems involved. My friend who has born that way initially had major health issues. Fortunately, he lived.

My sister was in an incubator for about two weeks. She is fine. The Medical field has come a LONG way, my friend.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
deactivated-5cacc9e03b460

6976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#340 deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
Member since 2005 • 6976 Posts

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]But he or she has already been born. Separated from his or her mother, as its own entity. Sure, if a mother is not there to nurture and feed the baby, the baby will die. But how can you compare the two? They are completely different. One has a brain that processes emotion, and the other does not.

Animatronic64

What if a freshly birthed baby is put back in it's mothers womb? Should it's rights be revoked? A baby a minute before being born is no different than a fresh born baby.

I'm sorry, but that's probably the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, concerning abortion. :lol:

It is ridiculous isn't it! It's ridiculous that a new born baby has a right to life, but a baby a few minutes before being birthed has none... simply because it's in it's mothers womb. But you didn't answer my scenario.

Avatar image for Animatronic64
Animatronic64

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#341 Animatronic64
Member since 2010 • 3971 Posts

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]What if a freshly birthed baby is put back in it's mothers womb? Should it's rights be revoked? A baby a minute before being born is no different than a fresh born baby.

racer8dan

I'm sorry, but that's probably the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, concerning abortion. :lol:

It is ridiculous isn't it! It's ridiculous that a new born baby has a right to life, but a baby a few minutes before being birthed has none... simply because it's in it's mothers womb. But you didn't answer my scenario.

You're assuming that a fully developed baby is the same thing as an embryo, which would be a big fat joke, honestly.

Avatar image for Planet_Pluto
Planet_Pluto

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#342 Planet_Pluto
Member since 2011 • 2235 Posts

[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]I'm sorry, but that's probably the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, concerning abortion. :lol:

Animatronic64

I'm thinking that maybe a better example would be a premature baby that is born and placed immediately in an incubator.

Isn't that a good thing? Trying to save a baby? Usually when one ends up being born pre-mature, there's health problems involved. My friend who has born that way initially had major health issues. Fortunately, he lived.

"Most" premies end up just fine.

But anyway, say something should happen to anyone, including you.... say, a car accident. Why should doctors, etc try to save you? Save for your age, what important things hinge on your existance? Why save an adult and not a baby?

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#343 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]So it's ok to "terminate" a not-baby a few days before mommy goes into labor?

Planet_Pluto

No its illegal to do so, there is a limit up on till which time an abortion can take place after which the mommy to be can no longer terminate the fetus.

Laws change all the time. Abortion itself wasn't always legal in the same ways it is now. I'm asking for YOUR thoughts on the matter.

The act of abortion itself I find repugnant but I have always been a bit squeamish, that aside I believe it should be the womans choice as it is her body in question.

I do not consider it practical that every conception should run to term.

Avatar image for Animatronic64
Animatronic64

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#344 Animatronic64
Member since 2010 • 3971 Posts

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"][QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]I'm thinking that maybe a better example would be a premature baby that is born and placed immediately in an incubator.

Planet_Pluto

Isn't that a good thing? Trying to save a baby? Usually when one ends up being born pre-mature, there's health problems involved. My friend who has born that way initially had major health issues. Fortunately, he lived.

"Most" premies end up just fine.

But anyway, say something should happen to anyone, including you.... say, a car accident. Why should doctors, etc try to save you? Save for your age, what important things hinge on your existance? Why save an adult and not a baby?

A bad example. A developing fetus, and me on the verge of death aren't the same thing at all. I was already a living human. A productive member of society. Comparisons like that are silly.

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#345 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts

"Most" premies end up just fine.

But anyway, say something should happen to anyone, including you.... say, a car accident. Why should doctors, etc try to save you? Save for your age, what important things hinge on your existance? Why save an adult and not a baby?

Planet_Pluto
People have an entire web of connections to society, between family, friends, job, financial obligations, etc... Many many things are affected by the death of a person who has established themselves in the world. If a fetus is aborted, absolutely nothing changes. The world is exactly the same.
Avatar image for Frame_Dragger
Frame_Dragger

9581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#346 Frame_Dragger
Member since 2009 • 9581 Posts
[QUOTE="racer8dan"]

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]What if a freshly birthed baby is put back in it's mothers womb? Should it's rights be revoked? A baby a minute before being born is no different than a fresh born baby.

I'm sorry, but that's probably the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, concerning abortion. :lol:

It is ridiculous isn't it! It's ridiculous that a new born baby has a right to life, but a baby a few minutes before being birthed has none... simply because it's in it's mothers womb. But you didn't answer my scenario.

You do know that a baby at that point in fact, DOES have rights? In fact, a court can appoint a lawyer/guardian to represent its interests, although in practice this is rare. If you're going to be overly dramatic, at least be dramatic and accurate.
Avatar image for Animatronic64
Animatronic64

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#347 Animatronic64
Member since 2010 • 3971 Posts

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]What if a freshly birthed baby is put back in it's mothers womb? Should it's rights be revoked? A baby a minute before being born is no different than a fresh born baby.

racer8dan

I'm sorry, but that's probably the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, concerning abortion. :lol:

It is ridiculous isn't it! It's ridiculous that a new born baby has a right to life, but a baby a few minutes before being birthed has none... simply because it's in it's mothers womb. But you didn't answer my scenario.

There's a good reason why I didn't answer your question. Abortions are only legal up to a certain point.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#348 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts
[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"][QUOTE="racer8dan"]

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]I'm sorry, but that's probably the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, concerning abortion. :lol:

It is ridiculous isn't it! It's ridiculous that a new born baby has a right to life, but a baby a few minutes before being birthed has none... simply because it's in it's mothers womb. But you didn't answer my scenario.

You do know that a baby at that point in fact, DOES have rights? In fact, a court can appoint a lawyer/guardian to represent its interests, although in practice this is rare. If you're going to be overly dramatic, at least be dramatic and accurate.

That's what happens when one taps in emotion as a source in arguments.
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#349 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"] You do know that a baby at that point in fact, DOES have rights? In fact, a court can appoint a lawyer/guardian to represent its interests, although in practice this is rare. If you're going to be overly dramatic, at least be dramatic and accurate.

Not to mention that pro-lifers (or anti-choicers, whatever) always focus on late-term abortions, when in fact the overwhelming vast majority of abortions happen quite early in the pregnancy. After all, if someone doesn't want a child, then why would they put themselves through 8 or 9 months of pregnancy before doing it? Almost all abortions done very late in the term are done because either the health of the mother is at risk, or it is determined that the fetus has major defects.
Avatar image for deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
deactivated-5cacc9e03b460

6976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#350 deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
Member since 2005 • 6976 Posts

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]

[QUOTE="Animatronic64"]I'm sorry, but that's probably the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, concerning abortion. :lol:

Frame_Dragger

It is ridiculous isn't it! It's ridiculous that a new born baby has a right to life, but a baby a few minutes before being birthed has none... simply because it's in it's mothers womb. But you didn't answer my scenario.

You do know that a baby at that point in fact, DOES have rights? In fact, a court can appoint a lawyer/guardian to represent its interests, although in practice this is rare. If you're going to be overly dramatic, at least be dramatic and accurate.

At what point does it have a legal right to life?