BNP London Organiser says...

[QUOTE="FrostyPhantasm"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

Because that's what happens when whites become a minority. South Africa's present is America's/Europe's future.

AHUGECAT

http://www.vancouversun.com/story_print.html?id=2507847&sponsor=

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

[QUOTE="FrostyPhantasm"] :lol: The amount of ignorance, bigotry, and just sheer xenophobia is outstanding in you. Whites are a minority in a couple of the provinces in Canada, and hell the entire country 20 years from now, strange, i don't see Black Canadians breaking down my door murdering my family. HURP DURP? Why? Because this isn't a war-torn poor 3rd world country, this is a first world country. Try again.Ninja-Hippo

http://www.vancouversun.com/story_print.html?id=2507847&sponsor=

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

[QUOTE="majoras_wrath"] Derp. Whites started as a minority in South Africa.majoras_wrath

Whites were in South Africa years before blacks were.

White people have lived in South Africa over 300 years ago, even 150 years after the first colonies around Cape Town, at the beginning of the 19th century, there were still no blacks hundreds of miles around.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Cape_Town

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

[QUOTE="FrostyPhantasm"] :lol: The amount of ignorance, bigotry, and just sheer xenophobia is outstanding in you. Whites are a minority in a couple of the provinces in Canada, and hell the entire country 20 years from now, strange, i don't see Black Canadians breaking down my door murdering my family. HURP DURP? Why? Because this isn't a war-torn poor 3rd world country, this is a first world country. Try again.FrostyPhantasm

http://www.vancouversun.com/story_print.html?id=2507847&sponsor=

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

[QUOTE="FrostyPhantasm"] :lol: The amount of ignorance, bigotry, and just sheer xenophobia is outstanding in you. Whites are a minority in a couple of the provinces in Canada, and hell the entire country 20 years from now, strange, i don't see Black Canadians breaking down my door murdering my family. HURP DURP? Why? Because this isn't a war-torn poor 3rd world country, this is a first world country. Try again.FrostyPhantasm

http://www.vancouversun.com/story_print.html?id=2507847&sponsor=

Canada to being like apartheid?

Dang, political correctness has taken over.

China is 99% Chinese by the way.

[QUOTE="FrostyPhantasm"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

http://www.vancouversun.com/story_print.html?id=2507847&sponsor=

AHUGECAT

Canada to being like apartheid?

Dang, political correctness has taken over.

China is 99% Chinese by the way.

Seriously. Reading comprehension.

[QUOTE="FrostyPhantasm"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

http://www.vancouversun.com/story_print.html?id=2507847&sponsor=

AHUGECAT

Canada to being like apartheid?

Dang, political correctness has taken over.

China is 99% Chinese by the way.

[QUOTE="majoras_wrath"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

Whites were in South Africa years before blacks were.

AHUGECAT

White people have lived in South Africa over 300 years ago, even 150 years after the first colonies around Cape Town, at the beginning of the 19th century, there were still no blacks hundreds of miles around.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Cape_Town

In reference to the nearby mountains "The original name given to the mountain by the first Khoi inhabitants was Hoeri 'kwaggo ("sea mountain")" Khoi, meaning the tribe of native Africans, also known as blacks.

From the Khoi article on Wikipedia "The Khoikhoi were originally part of a pastoral culture and language group found across Southern Africa. Originated in the northern area of modern Botswana, the ethnic group steadily migrated south, reaching the Cape approximately 2,000 years ago"

For your own sake, please be a really really determined troll.

I love how your own link proves you wrong :D

majoras_wrath

[QUOTE="majoras_wrath"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

Whites were in South Africa years before blacks were.

AHUGECAT

White people have lived in South Africa over 300 years ago, even 150 years after the first colonies around Cape Town, at the beginning of the 19th century, there were still no blacks hundreds of miles around.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Cape_Town

A painting of the first Europeans to land in South Africa. Guess who's in the picture?

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

[QUOTE="FrostyPhantasm"] Derp, maybe you should read the article you've linked me twice without any backing up of what's ACTUALLY INSIDE IT, it's a conspiracy theorists approach that all of Canada are white supremacists which only further goes against your argument, HELL the article you linked equates CANADA TO BEING LIKE THE APARTHEID WHICH YOU APPARENTLY LIKE, and it's reasoning for this is because the teachers are white and the students aren't? WHAT KIND OF REASONING IS THAT, THE CITY IS MAJORILY NON-WHITE, of course the students wont be! Also the only languages any business man HAS to learn in Canada is English and French, and his been so for YEARS. Try again.PannicAtack

Canada to being like apartheid?

Dang, political correctness has taken over.

China is 99% Chinese by the way.

Seriously. Reading comprehension.

http://www.vancouver2010.com/olympic-videos/%28afp%29---chinatown-in-vancouver-cheers-on-canadian-olympic-team_278492g110288-QJ.html

Thousands of Chinese show their loyalty to China during the Vancouver olympics.

See, that article is very racial from an Asian perspective. He wanted to set up Mandarin schools so that Chinese speakers could attent, and he wanted a separate school system for the Chinese, and even called English the "Colonial Language," and complained the neighborhood of Kitsilano is "too white." He also talked about "White Supremacisy" alot, and he seemed to want a lot more Asians in power.

As I said, China is 99% Chinese so they do not have the same views as multiculturalism as Canada does, so when China becomes the new world's super power, China will need help fitting its 1.5 billion (give or take a couple hundred million) people somewhere, so that "not so quiet revolution" will turn into a very loud revolution.

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

Canada to being like apartheid?

Dang, political correctness has taken over.

China is 99% Chinese by the way.

AHUGECAT

Seriously. Reading comprehension.

http://www.vancouver2010.com/olympic-videos/%28afp%29---chinatown-in-vancouver-cheers-on-canadian-olympic-team_278492g110288-QJ.html

Thousands of Chinese show their loyalty to China during the Vancouver olympics.

See, that article is very racial from an Asian perspective. He wanted to set up Mandarin schools so that Chinese speakers could attent, and he wanted a separate school system for the Chinese, and even called English the "Colonial Language," and complained the neighborhood of Kitsilano is "too white." He also talked about "White Supremacisy" alot, and he seemed to want a lot more Asians in power.

As I said, China is 99% Chinese so they do not have the same views as multiculturalism as Canada does, so when China becomes the new world's super power, China will need help fitting its 1.5 billion (give or take a couple hundred million) people somewhere, so that "not so quiet revolution" will turn into a very loud revolution.

Once again, you lack any form of a logical argument, so you make up a random deflection onto a country which has no bearing on the topic at hand ALL. The article you linked is the polar opposite of political correctness, I don't know what you are getting at, and it looks like you don't either..FrostyPhantasm

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

[QUOTE="majoras_wrath"] Source? I don't know why I bother asking, but you are flat-out wrong. :lol:Ninja-Hippo

White people have lived in South Africa over 300 years ago, even 150 years after the first colonies around Cape Town, at the beginning of the 19th century, there were still no blacks hundreds of miles around.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Cape_Town

A painting of the first Europeans to land in South Africa. Guess who's in the picture?

Jan van Riebeeck wasn't the first European to arrive in Cape Town.

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

Canada to being like apartheid?

Dang, political correctness has taken over.

China is 99% Chinese by the way.

AHUGECAT

Seriously. Reading comprehension.

http://www.vancouver2010.com/olympic-videos/%28afp%29---chinatown-in-vancouver-cheers-on-canadian-olympic-team_278492g110288-QJ.html

Thousands of Chinese show their loyalty to China during the Vancouver olympics.

See, that article is very racial from an Asian perspective. He wanted to set up Mandarin schools so that Chinese speakers could attent, and he wanted a separate school system for the Chinese, and even called English the "Colonial Language," and complained the neighborhood of Kitsilano is "too white." He also talked about "White Supremacisy" alot, and he seemed to want a lot more Asians in power.

As I said, China is 99% Chinese so they do not have the same views as multiculturalism as Canada does, so when China becomes the new world's super power, China will need help fitting its 1.5 billion (give or take a couple hundred million) people somewhere, so that "not so quiet revolution" will turn into a very loud revolution.

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

White people have lived in South Africa over 300 years ago, even 150 years after the first colonies around Cape Town, at the beginning of the 19th century, there were still no blacks hundreds of miles around.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Cape_Town

AHUGECAT

A painting of the first Europeans to land in South Africa. Guess who's in the picture?

Jan van Riebeeck wasn't the first European to arrive in Cape Town.

Read my post, please.

Orrrr avoid it since it completely destroys your delusional argument.

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

White people have lived in South Africa over 300 years ago, even 150 years after the first colonies around Cape Town, at the beginning of the 19th century, there were still no blacks hundreds of miles around.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Cape_Town

AHUGECAT

A painting of the first Europeans to land in South Africa. Guess who's in the picture?

Jan van Riebeeck wasn't the first European to arrive in Cape Town.

Perhaps they should get raped and see how much they actually enjoy it.

[QUOTE="FrostyPhantasm"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

http://www.vancouversun.com/story_print.html?id=2507847&sponsor=

AHUGECAT

Canada to being like apartheid?

Dang, political correctness has taken over.

China is 99% Chinese by the way.

1. It would take a ridiculous amount of immigrants to move to China to make a difference in the percentage of their population as their population figures are enormus.

2. Who would want to move to China?

Both points apply to India.

With regards to the whole Dutch being in South Africa before the blacks thing, this is somewhat true. The Khoi are actually genetically distinct from most Subsaharan Africans, having lighter skin and most notably the epicanthic eye fold which is also seen amongst East Asians but not the Bantu people who later migrated southward. The term black is fairly ambiguous of course, but I'd think the label would be about as misfitting for the Khoi as it would be for South Asians.

Regarding Vancouver: Duuuude. I lived in Vancouver, it's a cool place. Truthfully, Punjabi was a far more useful language where I grew up than the French we had to learn in school. Not once in my experience in Vancouver did I feel my wholesome white Canadian values threatened by my Sikh classmates' scaaaaary(!) foreign beliefs. Sure, I've taken issue with the actions of a few members of the Sikh community (revering Indira Gandhi's assassins and the Air India bombers most notably) but on the whole living with people who came from a different culture IS NOT THAT BIG A DEAL. See, the thing is CULTURES CHANGE, regardless of whether or not there's external population influx. Sure, it might accelerate it, but cultural change is inevitable even without any demographic shift...

...And this of course brings us back to the whole notion of keeping Britain "British". I've got news for you: British today would not be British 50 years ago regardless of whether or not immigration was occurring. When you (MushroomWig) complain about it not being your grandfather's Britain, you know what? It wouldn't be anyway. I'm not going to jump straight to calling anyone whose support for the BNP stems from cultural concerns a racist, but the only other justification I can think of would be this deluded, and as Xaos said earlier, regressivist take on just what culture is.

With regards to the whole Dutch being in South Africa before the blacks thing, this is somewhat true. The Khoi are actually genetically distinct from most Subsaharan Africans, having lighter skin and most notably the epicanthic eye fold which is also seen amongst East Asians but not the Bantu people who later migrated southward. The term black is fairly ambiguous of course, but I'd think the label would be about as misfitting for the Khoi as it would be for South Asian. Regarding the whole Vancouver thing: Duuuude. I lived in Vancouver, it's a cool place. Truthfully, Punjabi was a far more useful language where I grew up than the French we had to learn in school. Not once in my experience in Vancouver did I feel my wholesome white Canadian values threatened by my Sikh classmates' scaaaaary(!) foreign beliefs. Sure, I've taken issue with the actions of a few members of the Sikh community (revering Indira Gandhi's assassins and the Air India bombers most notably) but on the whole living with people who came from a different culture IS NOT THAT BIG A DEAL. See, the thing is CULTURES CHANGE, regardless of whether or not there's external population influx. Sure, it might accelerate it, but cultural change is inevitable even without any demographic shift... ...And this of course brings us back to the whole notion of keeping Britain "British". I've got news for you: British today would not be British 50 years ago regardless of whether or not immigration was occurring. When you (MushroomWig) complain about it not being your grandfather's Britain, you know what? It wouldn't be anyway. I'm not going to jump straight to calling anyone whose support for the BNP stems from cultural concerns a racist, but the only other justification I can think of would be this deluded, and as Xaos said earlier, regressivist take on just what culture is.D_Battery

Cultures do not change.

Look at Miami - 50 years of Cuban refugees and guess what?

Press 2 for English.

I live in Los Angeles and it's a de facto city of Mexico now.

I am not against immigration or "multiculturalism," what I am against is changing demographics and mass immigration. If mass immigration is so beneficial why don't third world countries use it to prop up their economies?

[QUOTE="D_Battery"]With regards to the whole Dutch being in South Africa before the blacks thing, this is somewhat true. The Khoi are actually genetically distinct from most Subsaharan Africans, having lighter skin and most notably the epicanthic eye fold which is also seen amongst East Asians but not the Bantu people who later migrated southward. The term black is fairly ambiguous of course, but I'd think the label would be about as misfitting for the Khoi as it would be for South Asian. Regarding the whole Vancouver thing: Duuuude. I lived in Vancouver, it's a cool place. Truthfully, Punjabi was a far more useful language where I grew up than the French we had to learn in school. Not once in my experience in Vancouver did I feel my wholesome white Canadian values threatened by my Sikh classmates' scaaaaary(!) foreign beliefs. Sure, I've taken issue with the actions of a few members of the Sikh community (revering Indira Gandhi's assassins and the Air India bombers most notably) but on the whole living with people who came from a different culture IS NOT THAT BIG A DEAL. See, the thing is CULTURES CHANGE, regardless of whether or not there's external population influx. Sure, it might accelerate it, but cultural change is inevitable even without any demographic shift... ...And this of course brings us back to the whole notion of keeping Britain "British". I've got news for you: British today would not be British 50 years ago regardless of whether or not immigration was occurring. When you (MushroomWig) complain about it not being your grandfather's Britain, you know what? It wouldn't be anyway. I'm not going to jump straight to calling anyone whose support for the BNP stems from cultural concerns a racist, but the only other justification I can think of would be this deluded, and as Xaos said earlier, regressivist take on just what culture is.AHUGECAT

Cultures do not change.

Look at Miami - 50 years of Cuban refugees and guess what?

Press 2 for English.

I am not against immigration or "multiculturalism," what I am against is changing demographics and mass immigration. If mass immigration is so beneficial why don't third world countries use it to prop up their economies?

How does that affect you? Why does it bother you so much?

[QUOTE="D_Battery"]With regards to the whole Dutch being in South Africa before the blacks thing, this is somewhat true. The Khoi are actually genetically distinct from most Subsaharan Africans, having lighter skin and most notably the epicanthic eye fold which is also seen amongst East Asians but not the Bantu people who later migrated southward. The term black is fairly ambiguous of course, but I'd think the label would be about as misfitting for the Khoi as it would be for South Asian. Regarding the whole Vancouver thing: Duuuude. I lived in Vancouver, it's a cool place. Truthfully, Punjabi was a far more useful language where I grew up than the French we had to learn in school. Not once in my experience in Vancouver did I feel my wholesome white Canadian values threatened by my Sikh classmates' scaaaaary(!) foreign beliefs. Sure, I've taken issue with the actions of a few members of the Sikh community (revering Indira Gandhi's assassins and the Air India bombers most notably) but on the whole living with people who came from a different culture IS NOT THAT BIG A DEAL. See, the thing is CULTURES CHANGE, regardless of whether or not there's external population influx. Sure, it might accelerate it, but cultural change is inevitable even without any demographic shift... ...And this of course brings us back to the whole notion of keeping Britain "British". I've got news for you: British today would not be British 50 years ago regardless of whether or not immigration was occurring. When you (MushroomWig) complain about it not being your grandfather's Britain, you know what? It wouldn't be anyway. I'm not going to jump straight to calling anyone whose support for the BNP stems from cultural concerns a racist, but the only other justification I can think of would be this deluded, and as Xaos said earlier, regressivist take on just what culture is.AHUGECAT

Cultures do not change.

Look at Miami - 50 years of Cuban refugees and guess what?

Press 2 for English.

I live in Los Angeles and it's a de facto city of Mexico now.

I am not against immigration or "multiculturalism," what I am against is changing demographics and mass immigration. If mass immigration is so beneficial why don't third world countries use it to prop up their economies?

Because no one wants to move to a third world country.

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

[QUOTE="D_Battery"]With regards to the whole Dutch being in South Africa before the blacks thing, this is somewhat true. The Khoi are actually genetically distinct from most Subsaharan Africans, having lighter skin and most notably the epicanthic eye fold which is also seen amongst East Asians but not the Bantu people who later migrated southward. The term black is fairly ambiguous of course, but I'd think the label would be about as misfitting for the Khoi as it would be for South Asian. Regarding the whole Vancouver thing: Duuuude. I lived in Vancouver, it's a cool place. Truthfully, Punjabi was a far more useful language where I grew up than the French we had to learn in school. Not once in my experience in Vancouver did I feel my wholesome white Canadian values threatened by my Sikh classmates' scaaaaary(!) foreign beliefs. Sure, I've taken issue with the actions of a few members of the Sikh community (revering Indira Gandhi's assassins and the Air India bombers most notably) but on the whole living with people who came from a different culture IS NOT THAT BIG A DEAL. See, the thing is CULTURES CHANGE, regardless of whether or not there's external population influx. Sure, it might accelerate it, but cultural change is inevitable even without any demographic shift... ...And this of course brings us back to the whole notion of keeping Britain "British". I've got news for you: British today would not be British 50 years ago regardless of whether or not immigration was occurring. When you (MushroomWig) complain about it not being your grandfather's Britain, you know what? It wouldn't be anyway. I'm not going to jump straight to calling anyone whose support for the BNP stems from cultural concerns a racist, but the only other justification I can think of would be this deluded, and as Xaos said earlier, regressivist take on just what culture is.SgtKevali

Cultures do not change.

Look at Miami - 50 years of Cuban refugees and guess what?

Press 2 for English.

I am not against immigration or "multiculturalism," what I am against is changing demographics and mass immigration. If mass immigration is so beneficial why don't third world countries use it to prop up their economies?

How does that affect you? Why does it bother you so much?

Do you really want me to list dozens of reasons?

Why does it bother so much for them to just learn English?

[QUOTE="D_Battery"]postAHUGECAT

Cultures do not change.

Look at Miami - 50 years of Cuban refugees and guess what?

Press 2 for English.

I live in Los Angeles and it's a de facto city of Mexico now.

I am not against immigration or "multiculturalism," what I am against is changing demographics and mass immigration. If mass immigration is so beneficial why don't third world countries use it to prop up their economies?

Because third world nations have completely different economies tahn first world nations..... In countries like AMERICA the citizens dont want to do the low end jobs...but they need doing thus immigration. You arent gonna find many American citizens picking fruit for instance

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

[QUOTE="D_Battery"]With regards to the whole Dutch being in South Africa before the blacks thing, this is somewhat true. The Khoi are actually genetically distinct from most Subsaharan Africans, having lighter skin and most notably the epicanthic eye fold which is also seen amongst East Asians but not the Bantu people who later migrated southward. The term black is fairly ambiguous of course, but I'd think the label would be about as misfitting for the Khoi as it would be for South Asian. Regarding the whole Vancouver thing: Duuuude. I lived in Vancouver, it's a cool place. Truthfully, Punjabi was a far more useful language where I grew up than the French we had to learn in school. Not once in my experience in Vancouver did I feel my wholesome white Canadian values threatened by my Sikh classmates' scaaaaary(!) foreign beliefs. Sure, I've taken issue with the actions of a few members of the Sikh community (revering Indira Gandhi's assassins and the Air India bombers most notably) but on the whole living with people who came from a different culture IS NOT THAT BIG A DEAL. See, the thing is CULTURES CHANGE, regardless of whether or not there's external population influx. Sure, it might accelerate it, but cultural change is inevitable even without any demographic shift... ...And this of course brings us back to the whole notion of keeping Britain "British". I've got news for you: British today would not be British 50 years ago regardless of whether or not immigration was occurring. When you (MushroomWig) complain about it not being your grandfather's Britain, you know what? It wouldn't be anyway. I'm not going to jump straight to calling anyone whose support for the BNP stems from cultural concerns a racist, but the only other justification I can think of would be this deluded, and as Xaos said earlier, regressivist take on just what culture is.coolbeans90

Cultures do not change.

Look at Miami - 50 years of Cuban refugees and guess what?

Press 2 for English.

I live in Los Angeles and it's a de facto city of Mexico now.

I am not against immigration or "multiculturalism," what I am against is changing demographics and mass immigration. If mass immigration is so beneficial why don't third world countries use it to prop up their economies?

Because no one wants to move to a third world country.

And the fact they have strict immigration laws.

Mexico has executed illegal immigrants.

You arent gonna find many American citizens picking fruit for instance

weezyfb

Yes you are. My brother would love to pick fruit after being laid off.

[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

Cultures do not change.

Look at Miami - 50 years of Cuban refugees and guess what?

Press 2 for English.

I am not against immigration or "multiculturalism," what I am against is changing demographics and mass immigration. If mass immigration is so beneficial why don't third world countries use it to prop up their economies?

AHUGECAT

How does that affect you? Why does it bother you so much?

Do you really want me to list dozens of reasons?

Why does it bother so much for them to just learn English?

It's not exactly the easiest thing to do, however the VAST majority do. (Iwould assume)

Cultures do not change.

Look at Miami - 50 years of Cuban refugees and guess what?

Press 2 for English.

I live in Los Angeles and it's a de facto city of Mexico now.

I am not against immigration or "multiculturalism," what I am against is changing demographics and mass immigration. If mass immigration is so beneficial why don't third world countries use it to prop up their economies?

AHUGECAT

Please take Anthropology 100 NAO. Language change is not the same as cultural change.

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]

How does that affect you? Why does it bother you so much?

SgtKevali

Do you really want me to list dozens of reasons?

Why does it bother so much for them to just learn English?

It's not exactly the easiest thing to do, however the VAST majority do. (Iwould assume)

60% of Miami cannot speak english.

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

Cultures do not change.

Look at Miami - 50 years of Cuban refugees and guess what?

Press 2 for English.

I live in Los Angeles and it's a de facto city of Mexico now.

I am not against immigration or "multiculturalism," what I am against is changing demographics and mass immigration. If mass immigration is so beneficial why don't third world countries use it to prop up their economies?

AHUGECAT

Because no one wants to move to a third world country.

And the fact they have strict immigration laws.

Mexico has executed illegal immigrants.

And...? what?

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

Cultures do not change.

Look at Miami - 50 years of Cuban refugees and guess what?

Press 2 for English.

I live in Los Angeles and it's a de facto city of Mexico now.

I am not against immigration or "multiculturalism," what I am against is changing demographics and mass immigration. If mass immigration is so beneficial why don't third world countries use it to prop up their economies?

AHUGECAT

Because no one wants to move to a third world country.

And the fact they have strict immigration laws.

Mexico has executed illegal immigrants.

Yeah, but regardless, the laws make little difference for third world nations.

Mexico is a backwards nation that suffers even more the same destructive mentality that many in this nation do. And their economic policies are not much to boast about. Still, many wouldn't move there. They aren't losing much by having the laws in place because of such, and keep the sheeple happy.

[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

Do you really want me to list dozens of reasons?

Why does it bother so much for them to just learn English?

AHUGECAT

It's not exactly the easiest thing to do, however the VAST majority do. (Iwould assume)

60% of Miami cannot speak english.

Keyword: Miami.

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

Cultures do not change.

Look at Miami - 50 years of Cuban refugees and guess what?

Press 2 for English.

I live in Los Angeles and it's a de facto city of Mexico now.

I am not against immigration or "multiculturalism," what I am against is changing demographics and mass immigration. If mass immigration is so beneficial why don't third world countries use it to prop up their economies?

D_Battery

Please take Anthropology 100 NAO. Language change is not the same as cultural change.

Yeah, some do assimilate and they should be able to stay, but the vast majority do not. I live in Los Angeles, and when I go to downtown (although there is almost never a reason to) it's literally not America. It can't be. Looks even WORSE than Tijuana.

[QUOTE="D_Battery"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

Cultures do not change.

Look at Miami - 50 years of Cuban refugees and guess what?

Press 2 for English.

I live in Los Angeles and it's a de facto city of Mexico now.

I am not against immigration or "multiculturalism," what I am against is changing demographics and mass immigration. If mass immigration is so beneficial why don't third world countries use it to prop up their economies?

AHUGECAT

Please take Anthropology 100 NAO. Language change is not the same as cultural change.

Yeah, some do assimilate and they should be able to stay, but the vast majority do not. I live in Los Angeles, and when I go to downtown (although there is almost never a reason to) it's literally not America. It can't be. Looks even WORSE than Tijuana.

[QUOTE="D_Battery"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

Cultures do not change.

Look at Miami - 50 years of Cuban refugees and guess what?

Press 2 for English.

I live in Los Angeles and it's a de facto city of Mexico now.

I am not against immigration or "multiculturalism," what I am against is changing demographics and mass immigration. If mass immigration is so beneficial why don't third world countries use it to prop up their economies?

Please take Anthropology 100 NAO. Language change is not the same as cultural change.

Yeah, some do assimilate and they should be able to stay, but the vast majority do not. I live in Los Angeles, and when I go to downtown (although there is almost never a reason to) it's literally not America. It can't be. Looks even WORSE than Tijuana.

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

[QUOTE="D_Battery"]

Please take Anthropology 100 NAO. Language change is not the same as cultural change.

D_Battery

Yeah, some do assimilate and they should be able to stay, but the vast majority do not. I live in Los Angeles, and when I go to downtown (although there is almost never a reason to) it's literally not America. It can't be. Looks even WORSE than Tijuana.

A third world country?

I take it this BNP is something like the Tea Party over here? Lol. :PTauruslink

How is the Tea Party anything like the BNP?

[QUOTE="Wolls"][QUOTE="MushroomWig"] Of course it's not racism, it's wanting to keep Great Britain British and not a multi-culterial society. the BNP are not racist, they just do not want British people to be the minortiy IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY.MushroomWig

Why is it BNP supporters are generally so ignorant of their own culture?In what sense has multi-cultural Britain has been around for less than 50 years? The British Isles have ALWAYS been multicultural.

The current royal line, the House of Windsor, are German, not British! The Queen's husband, Prince Phillip, is Greek! Previous royalty and royal usurpers were born in the Netherlands, France, Italy; all over Europe.

The British people themselves are an amalgam of Britons, Normans (from France), Celts (from Central Europe), Norse (from Scandinavia), Romans (from Italy) and Anglo-Saxons (from Germany).

Yet somehow, this is all whitewashed (literally). You claim the BNP doesn't discriminate racially, merely against people who were not 'born' in Britain, so why are the 1950s the cutoff point for "being British". Did you know, for example, Chinese communities in Liverpool are older than the WIndsor line being born in Britain?

[QUOTE="Tauruslink"]I take it this BNP is something like the Tea Party over here? Lol. :PAHUGECAT

How is the Tea Party anything like the BNP?

[QUOTE="D_Battery"]With regards to the whole Dutch being in South Africa before the blacks thing, this is somewhat true. The Khoi are actually genetically distinct from most Subsaharan Africans, having lighter skin and most notably the epicanthic eye fold which is also seen amongst East Asians but not the Bantu people who later migrated southward. The term black is fairly ambiguous of course, but I'd think the label would be about as misfitting for the Khoi as it would be for South Asian. Regarding the whole Vancouver thing: Duuuude. I lived in Vancouver, it's a cool place. Truthfully, Punjabi was a far more useful language where I grew up than the French we had to learn in school. Not once in my experience in Vancouver did I feel my wholesome white Canadian values threatened by my Sikh classmates' scaaaaary(!) foreign beliefs. Sure, I've taken issue with the actions of a few members of the Sikh community (revering Indira Gandhi's assassins and the Air India bombers most notably) but on the whole living with people who came from a different culture IS NOT THAT BIG A DEAL. See, the thing is CULTURES CHANGE, regardless of whether or not there's external population influx. Sure, it might accelerate it, but cultural change is inevitable even without any demographic shift... ...And this of course brings us back to the whole notion of keeping Britain "British". I've got news for you: British today would not be British 50 years ago regardless of whether or not immigration was occurring. When you (MushroomWig) complain about it not being your grandfather's Britain, you know what? It wouldn't be anyway. I'm not going to jump straight to calling anyone whose support for the BNP stems from cultural concerns a racist, but the only other justification I can think of would be this deluded, and as Xaos said earlier, regressivist take on just what culture is.AHUGECAT

Cultures do not change.

Look at Miami - 50 years of Cuban refugees and guess what?

Press 2 for English.

I live in Los Angeles and it's a de facto city of Mexico now.

I am not against immigration or "multiculturalism," what I am against is changing demographics and mass immigration. If mass immigration is so beneficial why don't third world countries use it to prop up their economies?

>I am not against immigration or "multiculturalism," what I am against is changing demographics and mass immigration.AHUGECAT

>I am not against immigration or "multiculturalism," what I am against is changing demographics and mass immigration.AHUGECAT

Your posts on this thread (and many other threads discussing similar subjects) seem to imply exactly the opposite.

In fact in this thread you have accused a person of "taking advantage" of the country he lives in by benefiting from some policies (which should and in fact do benfit everyone).

Edits: Grammar mistake and formatting issues.

I don't understand White nationalists :? Yes - I can definitely understand why you would want to be the majority (preferably 90%+) in your country. But deporting and treating immigrants like second-class citizens is inhumane. No supposedly homogenous country, which White Nationalists look up to, practice evil like that. All I can say is that they (white nationalists) are sick in the head, to say the least.