British police arrest 6 men for burning Quran

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for raynimrod
raynimrod

6862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#51 raynimrod
Member since 2005 • 6862 Posts

[QUOTE="raynimrod"]

It was America in that instance. In all honesty, I think it's unbelievable that white supremacists are allowed to parade the streets inciting racial violence. I don't think burning holy books in public should be allowed, but in private I see no reason why there should be any issues with that. It certainly shouldn't warrant police interference!

Espada12

So you pretty much agree with me? Because I think that's pretty unbelievable as well, but as usual people want to go to extremes with things. Take freedom of speech to an extreme and that is what you get. The british decide to limit it and have found very good middle ground.

I agree that it shouldn't be permitted in public, on the streets. I don't agree with supressing that freedom in your own home / in private. A video on youtube is hardly causing Muslims in Britain to take to the streets in a violent rage. And even if it did, they're the ones being violent and they should be arrested IMO.

Avatar image for Fried_Shrimp
Fried_Shrimp

2902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Fried_Shrimp
Member since 2009 • 2902 Posts
Burning the Koran is a hate act and they should get arrested.
Avatar image for MrLions
MrLions

9833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#54 MrLions
Member since 2007 • 9833 Posts
They should honestly just stop making Bibles and Qur'ans! What a waste of trees! :x
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="psychobrew"]

Link.

While I think the six menarekind of ignorant and backwards for burning the Qurans, I can't believe you can be arrested for doing something like that in England.Is English lawreally that barbaric?

Jacobistheman

English law puts public safety above all else, if that's barbaric then I'm conan.

"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both."

I already replied to this, and it got deleted.

And no, I wasn't trolling. It was a legitimate question.

What are you, an anarchist? Where do you live where freedom isn't sacrificed for security? I live in the USA, the "land of the free", and yes...there are ABSOLUTELY restrictions on freedom for the sake of public safety. I'm not saying that I AGREE with all of those restrictions. But I'd very VERY hard pressed to say that no such restrictions should exist.

Yeah...in most societies, it is already standard to give up a little liberty in order to gain a little security. Are you an anarchist? Are you advocating a world in which there are NO restrictions on liberty for the benefit of security?

Avatar image for TroubleMaker411
TroubleMaker411

1445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#57 TroubleMaker411
Member since 2009 • 1445 Posts

Link.

While I think the six menarekind of ignorant and backwards for burning the Qurans, I can't believe you can be arrested for doing something like that in England.Is English lawreally that barbaric?

psychobrew

Seriously?

Burning the Quran is a sign of hate. It's a threatening act and is ****d as a hate crime. I don't think there is anything wrong with not tolerating hate crimes. English Law is far from barbaric, we care for our public's safety, how is that barbaric?

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#59 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45498 Posts
we should be above such petty acts, sure even some Muslim's in these countries burn Bibles, burn flags, but we shouldn't be over there as Christians, and we shouldn't make this into an issue of warring religions, we're in Afghanistan because of what happened on 9/11 and we're trying to root out those responsible the terrorists themselves want nothing more than for this to be a religious war for the purpose of rallying the billion+ Muslims of the world behind them, when we resort to acts like burning the Quran we're doing what they want us to do, burning Qurans isn't just an expression against the terrorists but an expression against all Muslims, including Muslims that aren't a part of these terrorists organizations, Muslims that have made lives for themselves in free nations, and when we burn Qurans we reinforce the belief that this is a religious war, that we're out there to fight Islam and not terrorists, and perpetuating such misguidedness has consequences, I'm not against these men being detained in the slightest
Avatar image for TroubleMaker411
TroubleMaker411

1445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#60 TroubleMaker411
Member since 2009 • 1445 Posts

[QUOTE="TroubleMaker411"]

[QUOTE="psychobrew"]

Link.

While I think the six menarekind of ignorant and backwards for burning the Qurans, I can't believe you can be arrested for doing something like that in England.Is English lawreally that barbaric?

Fried_Shrimp

Seriously?

Burning the Quran is a sign of hate. It's a threatening act and is ****d as a hate crime. I don't think there is anything wrong with not tolerating hate crimes. English Law is far from barbaric, we care for our public's safety, how is that barbaric?

He's calling us barbaric when his country still publicly executes retard women.

I forgot that!

Nice point, well made!

IMHO, the fact these idiots posted videos of themselves on youtube shows that they were trying to incite trouble. Doing it in the pub to show off is one thing, but spouting that crap and posting it online is pure hate mongering. And it shouldn't be tolerated

Avatar image for ej902
EJ902

14338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 EJ902
Member since 2005 • 14338 Posts
No reason for them to be arrested for burning something in private, in my opinion. In public, I could understand breaking it up (for health reasons among other things), but I don't care if people want to destroy a book in private. Not that I'd do it, however.
Avatar image for -Y2J-
-Y2J-

1000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 -Y2J-
Member since 2005 • 1000 Posts
No reason for them to be arrested for burning something in private, in my opinion. In public, I could understand breaking it up (for health reasons among other things), but I don't care if people want to destroy a book in private. Not that I'd do it, however.EJ902
it wasnt priavte since they put the video on youtube
Avatar image for dramaybaz
dramaybaz

6020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 dramaybaz
Member since 2005 • 6020 Posts
It may be due to public safety mainly, since you can't just burn things.
Avatar image for dramaybaz
dramaybaz

6020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 dramaybaz
Member since 2005 • 6020 Posts
And the laws regarding fire/burning are very strict in London. Ever since the great fire.
Avatar image for shinian
shinian

6871

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#66 shinian
Member since 2005 • 6871 Posts

I can't believe you can be arrested for doing something like that in England.Is English lawreally that barbaric?

psychobrew

Man in the 60', the British Parliament outlawed all music stations playing Pop&Rock.

Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#67 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

This seems like a great idea, though. Make everything that could be offensive illegal.

Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts

[QUOTE="psychobrew"]

I can't believe you can be arrested for doing something like that in England.Is English lawreally that barbaric?

shinian

Man in the 60', the British Parliament outlawed all music stations playing Pop&Rock.

Really? Have you got a link for that? I know some songs were censored or banned from airplay by the BBC, and that most countries had (or have) pretty strict licensing regulations to prevent just anyone from broadcasting, but I'd never heard about stations being outlawed for the sole reason that they played pop or rock. :shock:

Avatar image for Wolls
Wolls

19119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#69 Wolls
Member since 2005 • 19119 Posts
Well the man are idiots but that doesn't make this arrest a good thing imo
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#70 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

What makes this "barbaric"? They are trying to prevent violence against innocent civilians. Muslims extremists *will* react to this, and everyone knows it. Its why these guys are burning the Qur'an (to incite the reaction, so they can further their hate against Muslims as a whole, for being the only "cause" of terrorism), and its why they got arrested for burning the Qur'an .

I personally have something very wrong with burning books in general (they should be repaired, for the sake of intellectualism in all regards, unless so far gone that only their destruction and replacement with a new copy is deemed appropriate) and even think writing in pen in a book is wrong (it defaces the literature; but pencil is fine, since it can be erased). I've been reading the Qur'an lately, and honestly, it contains some really good stuff. Sure, like any religious text, it contains all that doom-and-gloom and violence towards non-believers... but there are definitely some progressive things (for their time) in there that were a step ahead of Jewish law, even farther in many regards than Jesus' teachings (instead of giving up all you own to the poor, you only give up what you can afford to give up).

What I really want to know, is what these people are trying to achieve with burning someone else's holy book. This is exactly the opposite both these religions teach in terms of respect for your fellow man, whether believer or not.

No reason for them to be arrested for burning something in private, in my opinion. In public, I could understand breaking it up (for health reasons among other things), but I don't care if people want to destroy a book in private. Not that I'd do it, however.EJ902

The problem is, they will never burn it in private, because their intent is not to destroy the book, but to attack the people who value it.

Avatar image for broken_bass_bin
broken_bass_bin

7515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 broken_bass_bin
Member since 2009 • 7515 Posts

We have laws against inciting racial hatred.

Anyone can say or do what they like, so long as it doesn't impede the rights of others. Burning the Qur'an and broadcasting it on YouTube for the sole reason of antagonising the Muslim community, both in this country and internationally, is certainly doing that, while at the same time compromising the safety of the public.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180248 Posts
I guess the US does have a bit more freedom than the UK then.....
Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts
I guess the US does have a bit more freedom than the UK then.....LJS9502_basic
Haha... you just wouldn't let it lie.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180248 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I guess the US does have a bit more freedom than the UK then.....jimmyjammer69
Haha... you just wouldn't let it lie.

Let what? I always read posts on here to the contrary.......
Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts
[QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I guess the US does have a bit more freedom than the UK then.....LJS9502_basic
Haha... you just wouldn't let it lie.

Let what? I always read posts on here to the contrary.......

Freedom's always going to be relative. One man's freedom to carry firearms is another man's freedom to live in fear of getting shot.
Avatar image for SkyWard20
SkyWard20

4509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 SkyWard20
Member since 2009 • 4509 Posts

Glad I don't live in England.

I'd rather not live in a country that stifles free speech like that.

Pixel-Pirate

Agreed. Me neither.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180248 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"]Haha... you just wouldn't let it lie.jimmyjammer69
Let what? I always read posts on here to the contrary.......

Freedom's always going to be relative. One man's freedom to carry firearms is another man's freedom to live in fear of getting shot.

Bad analogy. The second example isn't a freedom.
Avatar image for TroubleMaker411
TroubleMaker411

1445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#78 TroubleMaker411
Member since 2009 • 1445 Posts

I guess the US does have a bit more freedom than the UK then.....LJS9502_basic
If by freedom, you mean you are free to insult and offend any religious group that isn't christian, then yes, i guess you are right
[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

Glad I don't live in England.

I'd rather not live in a country that stifles free speech like that.

SkyWard20

Agreed.

Free speech stifled? i think not. I think we are protecting EVERYONE

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts
I'm against all kind of extremism, including those guys.
Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Let what? I always read posts on here to the contrary.......

Freedom's always going to be relative. One man's freedom to carry firearms is another man's freedom to live in fear of getting shot.

Bad analogy. The second example isn't a freedom.

Oh yeah, that would be the freedom to walk down the street without being verbally abused or threatened.
Avatar image for testfactor888
testfactor888

7157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 testfactor888
Member since 2010 • 7157 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I guess the US does have a bit more freedom than the UK then.....TroubleMaker411

If by freedom, you mean you are free to insult and offend any religious group that isn't christian, then yes, i guess you are right

Christianity is made fun of all the time in the USA.

Avatar image for SkyWard20
SkyWard20

4509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 SkyWard20
Member since 2009 • 4509 Posts

We have laws against inciting racial hatred.

Anyone can say or do what they like, so long as it doesn't impede the rights of others. Burning the Qur'an and broadcasting it on YouTube for the sole reason of antagonising the Muslim community, both in this country and internationally, is certainly doing that, while at the same time compromising the safety of the public.

broken_bass_bin
Are you people serious? Do you like living in fear of antagonizing the Muslim community? If the extremists wouldn't be so hostile, very little would be done to prevent things like the Qur'an burning
Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts
[QUOTE="broken_bass_bin"]

We have laws against inciting racial hatred.

Anyone can say or do what they like, so long as it doesn't impede the rights of others. Burning the Qur'an and broadcasting it on YouTube for the sole reason of antagonising the Muslim community, both in this country and internationally, is certainly doing that, while at the same time compromising the safety of the public.

SkyWard20
Are you people serious? Do you like living in fear of antagonizing the Muslim community? If the extremists wouldn't be so hostile, very little would be done to prevent things like the Qur'an burning

Nobody's afraid. That's why we get idiots like these guys in the first place. This whole idea that you have to choose between absolute freedom and absolute security is BS. It's a tradeoff, sure, a lot like the ban on waving swastikas around in post-Nazi Germany. But honestly, who gives a toss but sheep and crackpots?
Avatar image for SkyWard20
SkyWard20

4509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 SkyWard20
Member since 2009 • 4509 Posts
[QUOTE="SkyWard20"][QUOTE="broken_bass_bin"]

We have laws against inciting racial hatred.

Anyone can say or do what they like, so long as it doesn't impede the rights of others. Burning the Qur'an and broadcasting it on YouTube for the sole reason of antagonising the Muslim community, both in this country and internationally, is certainly doing that, while at the same time compromising the safety of the public.

jimmyjammer69
Are you people serious? Do you like living in fear of antagonizing the Muslim community? If the extremists wouldn't be so hostile, very little would be done to prevent things like the Qur'an burning

Nobody's afraid. That's why we get idiots like these guys in the first place. This whole idea that you have to choose between absolute freedom and absolute security is BS. It's a tradeoff, sure, a lot like the ban on waving swastikas around in post-Nazi Germany. But honestly, who gives a toss but sheep and crackpots?

Then why arrest them?
Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts
[QUOTE="SkyWard20"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="SkyWard20"] Are you people serious? Do you like living in fear of antagonizing the Muslim community? If the extremists wouldn't be so hostile, very little would be done to prevent things like the Qur'an burning

Nobody's afraid. That's why we get idiots like these guys in the first place. This whole idea that you have to choose between absolute freedom and absolute security is BS. It's a tradeoff, sure, a lot like the ban on waving swastikas around in post-Nazi Germany. But honestly, who gives a toss but sheep and crackpots?

Then why arrest them?

I know about as much as you do on what crime they were charged with. If Brits can be permanantly excluded from America for simply wrtiting an insulting e-mail addressed to your president, I hardly think this is the time to go on about Britain unreasonably incurring on liberties.
Avatar image for TroubleMaker411
TroubleMaker411

1445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#86 TroubleMaker411
Member since 2009 • 1445 Posts

[QUOTE="TroubleMaker411"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I guess the US does have a bit more freedom than the UK then.....testfactor888

If by freedom, you mean you are free to insult and offend any religious group that isn't christian, then yes, i guess you are right

Christianity is made fun of all the time in the USA.

Maybe so.

But in this country, if someone youtube'd themselves burning a bible, shouting the crap that those guys were, they would also have been arrested.

It is a public safety issue. And this country is very serious about that.

Burning holy scripture, no matter what kind, WILL incite a violent reaction and we have to be seen to be trying to stop it.

Instead of defending the freedom these people have to burn books, we defend the idea that everyone can live in this country in peace and we try very hard to uphold that.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180248 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"]Freedom's always going to be relative. One man's freedom to carry firearms is another man's freedom to live in fear of getting shot.jimmyjammer69
Bad analogy. The second example isn't a freedom.

Oh yeah, that would be the freedom to walk down the street without being verbally abused or threatened.

I think you have a very skewed idea of the US. No one walks down the street afraid of getting shot. I believe criminals are to which you are referring and last I checked criminals did possess and use guns in the UK. And I also believe your chavs abuse and threaten....oh...and let's not forget the knife deaths in the UK.
Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Bad analogy. The second example isn't a freedom.

Oh yeah, that would be the freedom to walk down the street without being verbally abused or threatened.

I think you have a very skewed idea of the US. No one walks down the street afraid of getting shot. I believe criminals are to which you are referring and last I checked criminals did possess and use guns in the UK. And I also believe your chavs abuse and threaten....oh...and let's not forget the knife deaths in the UK.

Good to know you were brought up in the ghetto. We've already had the knife death argument, and I showed you the statistics that clearly show more knife deaths per capita in America than UK. Still, this isn't America vs UK, it's about how far the government's role should be about public safety - personally, I can't think what else it should be about.
Avatar image for p2250
p2250

1520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 p2250
Member since 2003 • 1520 Posts

I don't know why people continue to make excuses for Muslim extremists by saying "there's extremists in every religion i.e. Christinaity". Christian extremists are not a problem in the way Muslims extremists are.

Hundreds of thousands if not millions of people have been killed, injured or displaced by Muslim extremists in just the past 10 years alone.

Eeven if people did burn the Bible, you're not going to see Christian 'extremists' do anything violent, if they do, it will be a very small number and no one will get killed over it.

Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts

I don't know why people continue to make excuses for Muslim extremists by saying "there's extremists in every religion i.e. Christinaity". Christian extremists are not a problem in the way Muslims extremists are.

Hundreds of thousands if not millions of people have been killed, injured or displaced by Muslim extremists in just the past 10 years alone.

Eeven if people did burn the Bible, you're not going to see Christian 'extremists' do anything violent, if they do, it will be a very small number and no one will get killed over it.

p2250
How is this thread about Muslim extremists?
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180248 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"]Oh yeah, that would be the freedom to walk down the street without being verbally abused or threatened.jimmyjammer69
I think you have a very skewed idea of the US. No one walks down the street afraid of getting shot. I believe criminals are to which you are referring and last I checked criminals did possess and use guns in the UK. And I also believe your chavs abuse and threaten....oh...and let's not forget the knife deaths in the UK.

Good to know you were brought up in the ghetto. We've already had the knife death argument, and I showed you the statistics that clearly show more knife deaths per capita in America than UK. Still, this isn't America vs UK, it's about how far the government's role should be about public safety - personally, I can't think what else it should be about.

*sigh*Overall people in the US are NOT afraid of being shot. Period. You can't spin it any other way without making a fallacious argument. There is crime in the UK as anywhere else. Period. You brought the gun argument up....now you want to change it and say it doesn't belong. So my question to you is...why bring it up then? Public safety is important to a point.....but it shouldn't curtail individual freedom unless necessary. I don't see this as necessary. If someone reacts violently....they should be arrested. But hey.....if living in fear of retribution is considered public safety....have at it. I just don't want to see the opposite argument in other threads. Which was my point.;)
Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

I don't know why people continue to make excuses for Muslim extremists by saying "there's extremists in every religion i.e. Christinaity". Christian extremists are not a problem in the way Muslims extremists are.

Hundreds of thousands if not millions of people have been killed, injured or displaced by Muslim extremists in just the past 10 years alone.

Eeven if people did burn the Bible, you're not going to see Christian 'extremists' do anything violent, if they do, it will be a very small number and no one will get killed over it.

p2250
Don't you ever get tired? Man its getting old.
Avatar image for TroubleMaker411
TroubleMaker411

1445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#93 TroubleMaker411
Member since 2009 • 1445 Posts

I don't know why people continue to make excuses for Muslim extremists by saying "there's extremists in every religion i.e. Christinaity". Christian extremists are not a problem in the way Muslims extremists are.

Hundreds of thousands if not millions of people have been killed, injured or displaced by Muslim extremists in just the past 10 years alone.

Eeven if people did burn the Bible, you're not going to see Christian 'extremists' do anything violent, if they do, it will be a very small number and no one will get killed over it.

p2250

I didn't realise this was a thread about Muslim extremism

Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts

[QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] I think you have a very skewed idea of the US. No one walks down the street afraid of getting shot. I believe criminals are to which you are referring and last I checked criminals did possess and use guns in the UK. And I also believe your chavs abuse and threaten....oh...and let's not forget the knife deaths in the UK.LJS9502_basic
Good to know you were brought up in the ghetto. We've already had the knife death argument, and I showed you the statistics that clearly show more knife deaths per capita in America than UK. Still, this isn't America vs UK, it's about how far the government's role should be about public safety - personally, I can't think what else it should be about.

*sigh*Overall people in the US are NOT afraid of being shot. Period. You can't spin it any other way without making a fallacious argument. There is crime in the UK as anywhere else. Period. You brought the gun argument up....now you want to change it and say it doesn't belong. So my question to you is...why bring it up then? Public safety is important to a point.....but it shouldn't curtail individual freedom unless necessary. I don't see this as necessary. If someone reacts violently....they should be arrested. But hey.....if living in fear of retribution is considered public safety....have at it. I just don't want to see the opposite argument in other threads. Which was my point.;)

I never said that every American is afraid of being shot, I just tried to draw a parallel where security and freedoms meet closer to home for you (what, with you being American and all).

I think the point here is that, for whatever reason, these men's actions were deemed a threat to public safety. Like I say, I don't know all the facts of this case. If you want to draw the conclusion that this threat was all about fear of a violent Muslim backlash, that's your leap of faith.

Avatar image for Wittgenstein_
Wittgenstein_

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 Wittgenstein_
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
A book burning isn't worth the inevitable deaths due to Muslim violence in response, so in theory I support this arrest. In practice, I don't know whether it won't just call attention to it.
Avatar image for p2250
p2250

1520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 p2250
Member since 2003 • 1520 Posts
[QUOTE="TroubleMaker411"]

[QUOTE="p2250"]

I don't know why people continue to make excuses for Muslim extremists by saying "there's extremists in every religion i.e. Christinaity". Christian extremists are not a problem in the way Muslims extremists are.

Hundreds of thousands if not millions of people have been killed, injured or displaced by Muslim extremists in just the past 10 years alone.

Eeven if people did burn the Bible, you're not going to see Christian 'extremists' do anything violent, if they do, it will be a very small number and no one will get killed over it.

I didn't realise this was a thread about Muslim extremism

When the pastor of that Florida church said he was going to burn Quran's, why did everyone tell him that it would "endanger the troops" and be used as a recruiting tool for al-Qaida and the Taliban?
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180248 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"]Good to know you were brought up in the ghetto. We've already had the knife death argument, and I showed you the statistics that clearly show more knife deaths per capita in America than UK. Still, this isn't America vs UK, it's about how far the government's role should be about public safety - personally, I can't think what else it should be about.jimmyjammer69

*sigh*Overall people in the US are NOT afraid of being shot. Period. You can't spin it any other way without making a fallacious argument. There is crime in the UK as anywhere else. Period. You brought the gun argument up....now you want to change it and say it doesn't belong. So my question to you is...why bring it up then? Public safety is important to a point.....but it shouldn't curtail individual freedom unless necessary. I don't see this as necessary. If someone reacts violently....they should be arrested. But hey.....if living in fear of retribution is considered public safety....have at it. I just don't want to see the opposite argument in other threads. Which was my point.;)

I never said that every American is afraid of being shot, I just tried to draw a parallel where security and freedoms meet closer to home for you (what, with you being American and all).

I think the point here is that, for whatever reason, these men's actions were deemed a threat to public safety. Like I say, I don't know all the facts of this case. If you want to draw the conclusion that this threat was all about fear of a violent Muslim backlash, that's your leap of faith.

Oh so it was about the fear of Buddhist backlash?
Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts
[QUOTE="p2250"][QUOTE="TroubleMaker411"]

[QUOTE="p2250"]

I don't know why people continue to make excuses for Muslim extremists by saying "there's extremists in every religion i.e. Christinaity". Christian extremists are not a problem in the way Muslims extremists are.

Hundreds of thousands if not millions of people have been killed, injured or displaced by Muslim extremists in just the past 10 years alone.

Eeven if people did burn the Bible, you're not going to see Christian 'extremists' do anything violent, if they do, it will be a very small number and no one will get killed over it.

I didn't realise this was a thread about Muslim extremism

When the pastor of that Florida church said he was going to burn Quran's, why did everyone tell him that it would "endanger the troops" and be used as a recruiting tool for al-Qaida and the Taliban?

I'm trying to join the dots here, but it would help if you spelled it out.
Avatar image for TroubleMaker411
TroubleMaker411

1445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#99 TroubleMaker411
Member since 2009 • 1445 Posts

[QUOTE="TroubleMaker411"]

[QUOTE="p2250"]

I don't know why people continue to make excuses for Muslim extremists by saying "there's extremists in every religion i.e. Christinaity". Christian extremists are not a problem in the way Muslims extremists are.

Hundreds of thousands if not millions of people have been killed, injured or displaced by Muslim extremists in just the past 10 years alone.

Eeven if people did burn the Bible, you're not going to see Christian 'extremists' do anything violent, if they do, it will be a very small number and no one will get killed over it.

p2250

I didn't realise this was a thread about Muslim extremism

When the pastor of that Florida church said he was going to burn Quran's, why did everyone tell him that it would "endanger the troops" and be used as a recruiting tool for al-Qaida and the Taliban?

My point is....

I thought this was a thread discussing english law and how "Barbaric" we are. Not muslim extremism and racist, hate mongering pastors from florida!

Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts

[QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]*sigh*Overall people in the US are NOT afraid of being shot. Period. You can't spin it any other way without making a fallacious argument. There is crime in the UK as anywhere else. Period. You brought the gun argument up....now you want to change it and say it doesn't belong. So my question to you is...why bring it up then? Public safety is important to a point.....but it shouldn't curtail individual freedom unless necessary. I don't see this as necessary. If someone reacts violently....they should be arrested. But hey.....if living in fear of retribution is considered public safety....have at it. I just don't want to see the opposite argument in other threads. Which was my point.;)LJS9502_basic

I never said that every American is afraid of being shot, I just tried to draw a parallel where security and freedoms meet closer to home for you (what, with you being American and all).

I think the point here is that, for whatever reason, these men's actions were deemed a threat to public safety. Like I say, I don't know all the facts of this case. If you want to draw the conclusion that this threat was all about fear of a violent Muslim backlash, that's your leap of faith.

Oh so it was about the fear of Buddhist backlash?

Huh? I can see a case for a security concern over the hard right more than among Muslims. I don't know if you agree, but Muslim citizens have as much a right to feel secure as Christians or anyone else. Until I hear news about the crime they were charged with (could be arson for all I know), I'm not going to jump to any conclusions.