British police arrest 6 men for burning Quran

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#251 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
In the US we value you our freedom...we don't want a repressive government.LJS9502_basic
Tell that to the Patriot Act.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#252 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180248 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] In the US we value you our freedom...we don't want a repressive government.Ninja-Hippo
Tell that to the Patriot Act.

No need to fear it if one is not a terrorist.
Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#253 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23365 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] In the US we value you our freedom...we don't want a repressive government.Ninja-Hippo
Tell that to the Patriot Act.

Agreed... We'll probably never be rid of that thing.
Avatar image for Stanley09
Stanley09

1656

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#254 Stanley09
Member since 2009 • 1656 Posts
[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="psychobrew"]

Burning a book or calling someone a name isn't putting anyone's life at risk. People that riot over the act are. It's those people who overreact that should be arrested (if they physically harm someone).

If you know it will cause people to riot then you arrest the source of the problem, not the effect.

So why havent we arrested the Westboro Baptist church here in USA? Arresting people for burning a book is against freedom or expression
Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#255 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23365 Posts

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] In the US we value you our freedom...we don't want a repressive government.LJS9502_basic
Tell that to the Patriot Act.

No need to fear it if one is not a terrorist.

Isn't this kind of a tom-a-toe/tom-ah-toe kind of thing? Both restrict rights and freedoms in the name of security.

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#256 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

I can't wait for this horrible law to be over-turned, which was only put in place in the first place because the Labour government wanted to win back some muslim votes after the Iraq war. The new government should get rid of it any week now. :) Ninja-Hippo

When you get rid of the terrorism act and such come back to me.

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#257 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="psychobrew"]

Burning a book or calling someone a name isn't putting anyone's life at risk. People that riot over the act are. It's those people who overreact that should be arrested (if they physically harm someone).

Stanley09

If you know it will cause people to riot then you arrest the source of the problem, not the effect.

So why havent we arrested the Westboro Baptist church here in USA? Arresting people for burning a book is against freedom or expression

Because you live in America. Even though everyone was against it, they could do nothing about it in the name of freedom. Though in the end they did try to exhaust ever legal outlet they could find to get around the whole freedom thing, but with no success.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#258 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180248 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"] Tell that to the Patriot Act. mattbbpl

No need to fear it if one is not a terrorist.

Isn't this kind of a tom-a-toe/tom-ah-toe kind of thing? Both restrict rights and freedoms in the name of security.

It expanded on already existing procedures.....and border security. Nothing too drastic. What do you find to be heinous?
Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#259 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23365 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="mattbbpl"]

No need to fear it if one is not a terrorist.LJS9502_basic
Isn't this kind of a tom-a-toe/tom-ah-toe kind of thing? Both restrict rights and freedoms in the name of security.

It expanded on already existing procedures.....and border security. Nothing too drastic. What do you find to be heinous?

Unwarranted wire tapping is one that concerns me, but the more troubling issue I see is the ability to indefinitely detain individuals witthout any charges.
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#260 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

Unwarranted wire tapping is one that concerns me, but the more troubling issue I see is the ability to indefinitely detain individuals witthout any charges.mattbbpl

UK has that since 1990.. though I believe it's only two weeks.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#261 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180248 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="mattbbpl"] Isn't this kind of a tom-a-toe/tom-ah-toe kind of thing? Both restrict rights and freedoms in the name of security.

mattbbpl

It expanded on already existing procedures.....and border security. Nothing too drastic. What do you find to be heinous?

Unwarranted wire tapping is one that concerns me, but the more troubling issue I see is the ability to indefinitely detain individuals witthout any charges.

Both of which would not apply to law abiding citizens......and FYI....there has always been unwarranted wire tapping anyway. However, it eased restrictions on foreign intelligence gathering. The difference is in the ability to monitor foreign communication. This has you concerned....why?

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#262 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23365 Posts

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] It expanded on already existing procedures.....and border security. Nothing too drastic. What do you find to be heinous?LJS9502_basic

Unwarranted wire tapping is one that concerns me, but the more troubling issue I see is the ability to indefinitely detain individuals witthout any charges.

Both of which would not apply to law abiding citizens......and FYI....there has always been unwarranted wire tapping anyway. However, it eased restrictions on foreign intelligence gathering. The difference is in the ability to monitor foreign communication. This has you concerned....why?

You see no problem with skirting due process and jailing someone indefinitely without any charges? If innocent people don't have to worry about it, then why don't they simply charge the individuals, sentence them, and then hold them in prison for the duration of the sentence?

Even when people are formally charged and tried, innocent people are found guilty and sentenced. Why would I put faith in something that makes it even more likely for innocent people to be held in prison?
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#263 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180248 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"] Unwarranted wire tapping is one that concerns me, but the more troubling issue I see is the ability to indefinitely detain individuals witthout any charges.mattbbpl

Both of which would not apply to law abiding citizens......and FYI....there has always been unwarranted wire tapping anyway. However, it eased restrictions on foreign intelligence gathering. The difference is in the ability to monitor foreign communication. This has you concerned....why?

You see no problem with skirting due process and jailing someone indefinitely without any charges? If innocent people don't have to worry about it, then why don't they simply charge the individuals, sentence them, and then hold them in prison for the duration of the sentence?

Even when people are formally charged and tried, innocent people are found guilty and sentenced. Why would I put faith in something that makes it even more likely for innocent people to be held in prison?

That's not new though. Habeas corpus has often times been suspended during extraordinary times.
Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#264 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23365 Posts

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Both of which would not apply to law abiding citizens......and FYI....there has always been unwarranted wire tapping anyway. However, it eased restrictions on foreign intelligence gathering. The difference is in the ability to monitor foreign communication. This has you concerned....why?

LJS9502_basic

You see no problem with skirting due process and jailing someone indefinitely without any charges? If innocent people don't have to worry about it, then why don't they simply charge the individuals, sentence them, and then hold them in prison for the duration of the sentence?

Even when people are formally charged and tried, innocent people are found guilty and sentenced. Why would I put faith in something that makes it even more likely for innocent people to be held in prison?

That's not new though. Habeas corpus has often times been suspended during extraordinary times.

And the Patriot Act removes the "during extraordinary times" part....

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#265 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180248 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="mattbbpl"] You see no problem with skirting due process and jailing someone indefinitely without any charges? If innocent people don't have to worry about it, then why don't they simply charge the individuals, sentence them, and then hold them in prison for the duration of the sentence?

Even when people are formally charged and tried, innocent people are found guilty and sentenced. Why would I put faith in something that makes it even more likely for innocent people to be held in prison?mattbbpl

That's not new though. Habeas corpus has often times been suspended during extraordinary times.

And the Patriot Act removes the "during extraordinary times" part....

It does not apply to domestic crime. And it's nothing new. "The November 13, 2001 Presidential Military Order purported to give the President of the United States the power to detain non-citizens suspected of connection to terrorists or terrorism as enemy combatants" "The Court affirmed the basic principle that habeas corpus could not be revoked in the case of a citizen." Enemy combatants are considered prisoners of war by the way....
Avatar image for p2250
p2250

1520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#266 p2250
Member since 2003 • 1520 Posts

It's an appeasement measure, to try and tame the threat of British Muslims blowing up buses.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#267 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Both of which would not apply to law abiding citizens......and FYI....there has always been unwarranted wire tapping anyway. However, it eased restrictions on foreign intelligence gathering. The difference is in the ability to monitor foreign communication. This has you concerned....why?

LJS9502_basic

You see no problem with skirting due process and jailing someone indefinitely without any charges? If innocent people don't have to worry about it, then why don't they simply charge the individuals, sentence them, and then hold them in prison for the duration of the sentence?

Even when people are formally charged and tried, innocent people are found guilty and sentenced. Why would I put faith in something that makes it even more likely for innocent people to be held in prison?

That's not new though. Habeas corpus has often times been suspended during extraordinary times.

And those frame the darkest parts of our history.. We should not use this as a excuse to continue this what so ever.

Avatar image for Wittgenstein_
Wittgenstein_

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#268 Wittgenstein_
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

It's an appeasement measure, to try and tame the threat of British Muslims blowing up buses.

p2250
Well yeah, I think we all know that - but I'm happy that Quran-burning be prevented all the same. I'd rather see a minor restriction on freedom of speech than a bunch of Islamic thugs murdering people.