[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"][QUOTE="MarcusAntonius"]
You're reading something that isn't there, Jim. I'm looking at the report from CRS, not a glorifed blog like Think Progress (poor form there by the way). Clearly there is a window there that needs to be closed for Obama's claim to be accurate. I'll just leave it at that. The report speaks for itself.
GabuEx
I used ThinkProgress for the analogy alone. And Obama's claim IS accurate: Page 143 of the bill in question. SEC. 246. NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS. Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States. HR 3200
That is the bill itself. What part of my ARGUMENT is incorrect or inaccurate? What of what I stated is untrue? 1. The bill allows wives or children of illegal immigrants who ARE HERE LEGALLY via citizenship to be covered 2. The bill doesn't explicitly prevent illegal immigrants from going out to try and get coverage on their own, but provides no assistance financial or otherwise. Which of those two things are false? Your own source verifies those two things. Address the actual argument please. Heck, we should WANT illegal immigrants to pay for their own insurance so they don't become a burden on the rest of the country when they get sick and have no coverage. But the bill explicitly does not help them.For the record, PolitiFact's Truth-o-Meter has examined this question and has rated Wilson's claim false, saying exactly what Jim is saying: they could get insurance, but only by paying full price for it, which seems to me something that is hardly objectionable - there's no leeching going on there.
According to CRS: "There could be instances where some family members would meet the definition of an eligible individual for purposes of the credit, while other family members would not. For example, in a family consisting of a U.S. citizen married to an unauthorized alien and a U.S. citizen child, the U.S. citizen spouse and child could meet the criteria for being a credit-eligible individual, while the unauthorized alien spouse would not meet the criteria. H.R. 3200 does not expressly address how such a situation would be treated. Therefore, it appears that the Health Choices Commissioner would be responsible for determining how the credits would be administered in the case of mixed-status families."
What part of this are people not understanding? Oh yeah, back in July a congressman attempted to add checks to the program by implementing SAVE, which would have prevented illegals from receiving affordability credits which was defeated by the House Ways and Means Committee. Dubious, indeed. H.R. 3200 is rife with loopholes waiting to be exploited.
The bill is needlessly complex and with the way that its being rushed are causes for alarm.
Log in to comment