Congressman shouts "Liar" to Pres. Obama during speech to nation

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for jer_1
jer_1

7451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#251 jer_1
Member since 2003 • 7451 Posts

[QUOTE="jer_1"]I wouldn't call them the socialist party so much as I would acknowledge that there are a few socialist elements within the ranks. There are just a lot of people who feel they need to suck the teet of big mama government... :lol:Vandalvideo
Ironically, there are a few 'fascist'/socialist leaning philosophies employed by modern American Conservatives as well. I swear, the American political landscape is so daft. VIVA LIBERTARIANS!

I wouldn't doubt you are right. You seem to be pointing me out as a conservative though. :lol:

Yeah, thats something I am definitely not! I would throw conservatives under the bus just as quickly as I would throw a liberal under a bus, guy.

A constitutionalistis what I consider myself, nothing more nothing less. Definitely not a republicrat and definitely not a demopublican.

Avatar image for Dalo12345
Dalo12345

800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#252 Dalo12345
Member since 2007 • 800 Posts

Now if this was a Bush speech (not that it would be any less true), would anyone have really cared? You people play the left-right paradigm like a ****ing piano.

Avatar image for ZookGuy
ZookGuy

2340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#253 ZookGuy
Member since 2008 • 2340 Posts
I watched it last night, and I was surprised with the fact that the Republicans (especially the radical ones) didn't shout anything when he mentioned death panels to.
Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#254 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts

[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"][QUOTE="Unassigned"] He shouted the right word at the wrong time, the apology was needed.MarcusAntonius

SEC. 246. NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS. Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States. Where's the lie in what Obama was saying that the reform doesn't cover illegal immigrants?

Perhaps you missed my post. Liar? Perhaps not. Mistaken and ambiguous, certainly.

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27032807&page=21

My replies to Fidoism are completely applicable to your post. You two are both making the same argument. Heck, you're even using the same copy/pasted text from the same source. Feel free to read upwards on my earlier replies. In no way was President Obama either mistaken or ambiguous. Citizens and those here legally - including family members of illegals - are covered by this bill. Others are not. Just because the bill doesn't explicitly forbid illegal immigrants from going out and acquiring insurance on their own, that's nowhere close to giving them credits to help get insurance, which this explicitly forbids. The bill doesn't explicitly prevent illegal immigrants from going out and purchasing firearms. Does that mean that Obama's bill is giving firearms to illegal immigrants? No. It takes a huge stretching of the truth to say that just because the bill: A. Can cover/supply credits to family members of illegal immigrants who ARE here legally B. Doesn't explicitly do anything to prevent illegal immigrants from somehow going out and acquiring health coverage that Obama's bill is giving Health Insurance to illegal immigrants. Congressman Wilson's claim, in addition to being woefully rude and inappropriate, is verifiable false.
Avatar image for JJ_1
JJ_1

911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#255 JJ_1
Member since 2004 • 911 Posts

After seeing how people are reacting to the health reform, acting like children, yelling and screamin... Its apparent that people are stupid...

This makes me lose faith in, not only republicans, but humanity as a whole...

Avatar image for MarcusAntonius
MarcusAntonius

15667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#256 MarcusAntonius
Member since 2004 • 15667 Posts

[QUOTE="MarcusAntonius"]

[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"] SEC. 246. NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS. Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States. Where's the lie in what Obama was saying that the reform doesn't cover illegal immigrants?nocoolnamejim

Perhaps you missed my post. Liar? Perhaps not. Mistaken and ambiguous, certainly.

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27032807&page=21

My replies to Fidoism are completely applicable to your post. You two are both making the same argument. Heck, you're even using the same copy/pasted text from the same source. Feel free to read upwards on my earlier replies. In no way was President Obama either mistaken or ambiguous. Citizens and those here legally - including family members of illegals - are covered by this bill. Others are not. Just because the bill doesn't explicitly forbid illegal immigrants from going out and acquiring insurance on their own, that's nowhere close to giving them credits to help get insurance, which this explicitly forbids. The bill doesn't explicitly prevent illegal immigrants from going out and purchasing firearms. Does that mean that Obama's bill is giving firearms to illegal immigrants? No. It takes a huge stretching of the truth to say that just because the bill: A. Can cover/supply credits to family members of illegal immigrants who ARE here legally B. Doesn't explicitly do anything to prevent illegal immigrants from somehow going out and acquiring health coverage that Obama's bill is giving Health Insurance to illegal immigrants. Congressman Wilson's claim, in addition to being woefully rude and inappropriate, is verifiable false.

You're reading something that isn't there, Jim. I'm looking at the report from CRS, not a glorifed blog like Think Progress (poor form there by the way). Clearly there is a window there that needs to be closed for Obama's claim to be accurate. I'll just leave it at that. The report speaks for itself.

Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#257 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts

You're reading something that isn't there, Jim. I'm looking at the report from CRS, not a glorifed blog like Think Progress (poor form there by the way). Clearly there is a window there that needs to be closed for Obama's claim to be accurate. I'll just leave it at that. The report speaks for itself.

MarcusAntonius
I used ThinkProgress for the analogy alone. And Obama's claim IS accurate: [quote="HR 3200"] Page 143 of the bill in question. SEC. 246. NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS. Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States.

That is the bill itself. What part of my ARGUMENT is incorrect or inaccurate? What of what I stated is untrue? 1. The bill allows wives or children of illegal immigrants who ARE HERE LEGALLY via citizenship to be covered 2. The bill doesn't explicitly prevent illegal immigrants from going out to try and get coverage on their own, but provides no assistance financial or otherwise. Which of those two things are false? Your own source verifies those two things. Address the actual argument please. Heck, we should WANT illegal immigrants to pay for their own insurance so they don't become a burden on the rest of the country when they get sick and have no coverage. But the bill explicitly does not help them.
Avatar image for fillini
fillini

857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#258 fillini
Member since 2004 • 857 Posts

I've seen a bit of booing and so forth but yeah that seems a step over the line. duxup
step over the line because he was the only one to do it. the mumurs and comments Bush got in his State of the Union addresses were way worse. Wilson managed just to speak up solo. I almost that we were in England there for a moment.

Avatar image for fillini
fillini

857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#259 fillini
Member since 2004 • 857 Posts

[QUOTE="MarcusAntonius"]

You're reading something that isn't there, Jim. I'm looking at the report from CRS, not a glorifed blog like Think Progress (poor form there by the way). Clearly there is a window there that needs to be closed for Obama's claim to be accurate. I'll just leave it at that. The report speaks for itself.

nocoolnamejim

I used ThinkProgress for the analogy alone. And Obama's claim IS accurate:
Page 143 of the bill in question. SEC. 246. NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS. Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States. HR 3200
That is the bill itself. What part of my ARGUMENT is incorrect or inaccurate? What of what I stated is untrue? 1. The bill allows wives or children of illegal immigrants who ARE HERE LEGALLY via citizenship to be covered 2. The bill doesn't explicitly prevent illegal immigrants from going out to try and get coverage on their own, but provides no assistance financial or otherwise. Which of those two things are false? Your own source verifies those two things. Address the actual argument please. Heck, we should WANT illegal immigrants to pay for their own insurance so they don't become a burden on the rest of the country when they get sick and have no coverage. But the bill explicitly does not help them.

Like in the other post: Obama and the democratic leadership is giving them the ability to sign up for the program with no enforcement, period. The verification software used by over 200 government programs was expressively, intentionally left off the bill. And when the Republicans and Democrats tried to add it, the two measures were voted down. So their actions speak volumes. Obama's statements either mean he can't follow this logic or he is lying for political reasons.

Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#260 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
[QUOTE="jer_1"]I wouldn't call them the socialist party so much as I would acknowledge that there are a few socialist elements within the ranks. There are just a lot of people who feel they need to suck the teet of big mama government... :lol:Vandalvideo
Ironically, there are a few 'fascist'/socialist leaning philosophies employed by modern American Conservatives as well. I swear, the American political landscape is so daft. VIVA LIBERTARIANS!

Libertarians aren't exempt. I've seen them go as nutty as any party.
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#261 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

[QUOTE="MarcusAntonius"]

You're reading something that isn't there, Jim. I'm looking at the report from CRS, not a glorifed blog like Think Progress (poor form there by the way). Clearly there is a window there that needs to be closed for Obama's claim to be accurate. I'll just leave it at that. The report speaks for itself.

nocoolnamejim

I used ThinkProgress for the analogy alone. And Obama's claim IS accurate:
Page 143 of the bill in question. SEC. 246. NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS. Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States. HR 3200
That is the bill itself. What part of my ARGUMENT is incorrect or inaccurate? What of what I stated is untrue? 1. The bill allows wives or children of illegal immigrants who ARE HERE LEGALLY via citizenship to be covered 2. The bill doesn't explicitly prevent illegal immigrants from going out to try and get coverage on their own, but provides no assistance financial or otherwise. Which of those two things are false? Your own source verifies those two things. Address the actual argument please. Heck, we should WANT illegal immigrants to pay for their own insurance so they don't become a burden on the rest of the country when they get sick and have no coverage. But the bill explicitly does not help them.

For the record, PolitiFact's Truth-o-Meter has examined this question and has rated Wilson's claim false, saying exactly what Jim is saying: they could get insurance, but only by paying full price for it, which seems to me something that is hardly objectionable - there's no leeching going on there.

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#262 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts

[QUOTE="duxup"]I've seen a bit of booing and so forth but yeah that seems a step over the line. fillini

step over the line because he was the only one to do it. the mumurs and comments Bush got in his State of the Union addresses were way worse. Wilson managed just to speak up solo. I almost that we were in England there for a moment.

Aside from some boos I've never seen a State of the Union interrupted like that.

Considering McCain's response and Wilson's apology it would seem even he knew he was out of line.

Avatar image for fillini
fillini

857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#263 fillini
Member since 2004 • 857 Posts

[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"][QUOTE="MarcusAntonius"]

You're reading something that isn't there, Jim. I'm looking at the report from CRS, not a glorifed blog like Think Progress (poor form there by the way). Clearly there is a window there that needs to be closed for Obama's claim to be accurate. I'll just leave it at that. The report speaks for itself.

GabuEx

I used ThinkProgress for the analogy alone. And Obama's claim IS accurate:
Page 143 of the bill in question. SEC. 246. NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS. Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States. HR 3200
That is the bill itself. What part of my ARGUMENT is incorrect or inaccurate? What of what I stated is untrue? 1. The bill allows wives or children of illegal immigrants who ARE HERE LEGALLY via citizenship to be covered 2. The bill doesn't explicitly prevent illegal immigrants from going out to try and get coverage on their own, but provides no assistance financial or otherwise. Which of those two things are false? Your own source verifies those two things. Address the actual argument please. Heck, we should WANT illegal immigrants to pay for their own insurance so they don't become a burden on the rest of the country when they get sick and have no coverage. But the bill explicitly does not help them.

For the record, PolitiFact's Truth-o-Meter has examined this question and has rated Wilson's claim false, saying exactly what Jim is saying: they could get insurance, but only by paying full price for it, which seems to me something that is hardly objectionable.

That's fine in all but who is going to run the checks and enforce the policy?

Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#264 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
I swear, the Right is going more and more crazy. I heard on the radio some guy talking about how people in the right have taken up this conspiracy theory that Obama's going to put right-wing dissenters in concentration camps. The kicker is that this conspiracy theory goes back to the Nixon administration - hippies were scared that Nixon would put anti-war protesters in the concentration camps. And it's so freakin' annoying with people calling Obama a Nazi or a Marxist... he can't be both, make up your freakin' mind. And some of these town hall protesters... carrying guns at city hall?
Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#265 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts

>For the record, PolitiFact's Truth-o-Meter has examined this question and has rated Wilson's claim false, saying exactly what Jim is saying: they could get insurance, but only by paying full price for it, which seems to me something that is hardly objectionable.

GabuEx

How dare they pay into the health care system with their money!

Avatar image for fillini
fillini

857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#266 fillini
Member since 2004 • 857 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]>For the record, PolitiFact's Truth-o-Meter has examined this question and has rated Wilson's claim false, saying exactly what Jim is saying: they could get insurance, but only by paying full price for it, which seems to me something that is hardly objectionable.

duxup

How dare they pay into the health care system with their money!

But wouldn't some of that money be money they shoulda pay taxes on. So its our tax money their are using to buy themselves insurance in our government run system. still doesn't seem right to me.

Avatar image for pvtdonut54
pvtdonut54

8554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#267 pvtdonut54
Member since 2008 • 8554 Posts

Liar! OOOooo Nobody believes me....

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#268 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="duxup"]

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]>For the record, PolitiFact's Truth-o-Meter has examined this question and has rated Wilson's claim false, saying exactly what Jim is saying: they could get insurance, but only by paying full price for it, which seems to me something that is hardly objectionable.

fillini

How dare they pay into the health care system with their money!

But wouldn't some of that money be money they shoulda pay taxes on. So its our tax money their are using to buy themselves insurance in our government run system. still doesn't seem right to me.

Illegal immigrants pay taxes.
Avatar image for Ace_WondersX
Ace_WondersX

4455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#269 Ace_WondersX
Member since 2003 • 4455 Posts

[QUOTE="duxup"]

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]>For the record, PolitiFact's Truth-o-Meter has examined this question and has rated Wilson's claim false, saying exactly what Jim is saying: they could get insurance, but only by paying full price for it, which seems to me something that is hardly objectionable.

fillini

How dare they pay into the health care system with their money!

But wouldn't some of that money be money they shoulda pay taxes on. So its our tax money their are using to buy themselves insurance in our government run system. still doesn't seem right to me.

Let me see what you're trying to say... They don't pay income tax so we shouldn't allow them to buy health insurance? But then we should allow them to buy anything here, which would definitely not help the economy.
Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#270 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts

[QUOTE="duxup"]

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]>For the record, PolitiFact's Truth-o-Meter has examined this question and has rated Wilson's claim false, saying exactly what Jim is saying: they could get insurance, but only by paying full price for it, which seems to me something that is hardly objectionable.

fillini

How dare they pay into the health care system with their money!

But wouldn't some of that money be money they shoulda pay taxes on. So its our tax money their are using to buy themselves insurance in our government run system. still doesn't seem right to me.

Huh? Unless the employer is paying them cash, they pay taxes. Buying stuff Is good.
Avatar image for fillini
fillini

857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#271 fillini
Member since 2004 • 857 Posts

[QUOTE="fillini"]

[QUOTE="duxup"] How dare they pay into the health care system with their money!

Ace_WondersX

But wouldn't some of that money be money they shoulda pay taxes on. So its our tax money their are using to buy themselves insurance in our government run system. still doesn't seem right to me.

Let me see what you're trying to say... They don't pay income tax so we shouldn't allow them to buy health insurance? But then we should allow them to buy anything here, which would definitely not help the economy.

Nope not what I said. He said "with THEIR money". so i was just stating that it their tax FREE money that the illegally worked here for thats all.

And if your going to let immigrants purchase their Health Care with tax free money why not let the actually citizens of that country do so also??????

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#272 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace_WondersX"][QUOTE="fillini"] But wouldn't some of that money be money they shoulda pay taxes on. So its our tax money their are using to buy themselves insurance in our government run system. still doesn't seem right to me.

fillini

Let me see what you're trying to say... They don't pay income tax so we shouldn't allow them to buy health insurance? But then we should allow them to buy anything here, which would definitely not help the economy.

Nope not what I said. He said "with THEIR money". so i was just stating that it their tax FREE money that the illegally worked here for thats all.

And if your going to let immigrants purchase their Health Care with tax free money why not let the actually citizens of that country do so also??????

...they...pay...taxes

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=881584

Avatar image for not_wanted
not_wanted

1990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#273 not_wanted
Member since 2008 • 1990 Posts

At least he didn't throw a shoe at him. :P

Avatar image for fillini
fillini

857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#275 fillini
Member since 2004 • 857 Posts

[QUOTE="fillini"]

[QUOTE="Ace_WondersX"] Let me see what you're trying to say... They don't pay income tax so we shouldn't allow them to buy health insurance? But then we should allow them to buy anything here, which would definitely not help the economy.-Sun_Tzu-

Nope not what I said. He said "with THEIR money". so i was just stating that it their tax FREE money that the illegally worked here for thats all.

And if your going to let immigrants purchase their Health Care with tax free money why not let the actually citizens of that country do so also??????

...they...pay...taxes

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=881584

Read it. I actually agree with a some of the assertions she tries to make. Couldn't access the footnotes, so its sounds like a blog from a lawyer in San Francisco to me. So I have to disagree, all my personal experience and financial reading state other wise, concerning the economic impact of illegals. out of the 12 illegals I know personally NONE have ever paid their taxes. i have asked them if any of their people pay taxes and the say very few. they said ones that do are the families that hae lived her for years. These guys don't do anything period. they may go out every once in a while but there are like 8 or ten guys sharing a 19inch tv in a two or 3 bedroom apartment.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#276 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

That was completely uncalled for and was grade school politics. There is no excuse for that kind of behavior. His own party should censure him.

Avatar image for needled24-7
needled24-7

15902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#277 needled24-7
Member since 2007 • 15902 Posts

that's very immature of a congressman (well for anyone for that matter). when i become a congressman i can assure you i will never do something like that. mark my words

Avatar image for MarcusAntonius
MarcusAntonius

15667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#278 MarcusAntonius
Member since 2004 • 15667 Posts

[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"][QUOTE="MarcusAntonius"]

You're reading something that isn't there, Jim. I'm looking at the report from CRS, not a glorifed blog like Think Progress (poor form there by the way). Clearly there is a window there that needs to be closed for Obama's claim to be accurate. I'll just leave it at that. The report speaks for itself.

GabuEx

I used ThinkProgress for the analogy alone. And Obama's claim IS accurate:
Page 143 of the bill in question. SEC. 246. NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS. Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States. HR 3200
That is the bill itself. What part of my ARGUMENT is incorrect or inaccurate? What of what I stated is untrue? 1. The bill allows wives or children of illegal immigrants who ARE HERE LEGALLY via citizenship to be covered 2. The bill doesn't explicitly prevent illegal immigrants from going out to try and get coverage on their own, but provides no assistance financial or otherwise. Which of those two things are false? Your own source verifies those two things. Address the actual argument please. Heck, we should WANT illegal immigrants to pay for their own insurance so they don't become a burden on the rest of the country when they get sick and have no coverage. But the bill explicitly does not help them.

For the record, PolitiFact's Truth-o-Meter has examined this question and has rated Wilson's claim false, saying exactly what Jim is saying: they could get insurance, but only by paying full price for it, which seems to me something that is hardly objectionable - there's no leeching going on there.

According to CRS: "There could be instances where some family members would meet the definition of an eligible individual for purposes of the credit, while other family members would not. For example, in a family consisting of a U.S. citizen married to an unauthorized alien and a U.S. citizen child, the U.S. citizen spouse and child could meet the criteria for being a credit-eligible individual, while the unauthorized alien spouse would not meet the criteria. H.R. 3200 does not expressly address how such a situation would be treated. Therefore, it appears that the Health Choices Commissioner would be responsible for determining how the credits would be administered in the case of mixed-status families."

What part of this are people not understanding? Oh yeah, back in July a congressman attempted to add checks to the program by implementing SAVE, which would have prevented illegals from receiving affordability credits which was defeated by the House Ways and Means Committee. Dubious, indeed. H.R. 3200 is rife with loopholes waiting to be exploited.

The bill is needlessly complex and with the way that its being rushed are causes for alarm.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#279 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]

[QUOTE="fillini"]Nope not what I said. He said "with THEIR money". so i was just stating that it their tax FREE money that the illegally worked here for thats all.

And if your going to let immigrants purchase their Health Care with tax free money why not let the actually citizens of that country do so also??????

fillini

...they...pay...taxes

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=881584

Read it. I actually agree with a some of the assertions she tries to make. Couldn't access the footnotes, so its sounds like a blog from a lawyer in San Francisco to me. So I have to disagree, all my personal experience and financial reading state other wise, concerning the economic impact of illegals. out of the 12 illegals I know personally NONE have ever paid their taxes. i have asked them if any of their people pay taxes and the say very few. they said ones that do are the families that hae lived her for years. These guys don't do anything period. they may go out every once in a while but there are like 8 or ten guys sharing a 19inch tv in a two or 3 bedroom apartment.

Well, I linked just the abstract, but if you want to read the entire 58 page analysis, footnotes and all, be my guest.

http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/llr/vol9/lipman.pdf

Also, a side note, I wouldn't base sweeping generalization off of anecdotal evidence.

Avatar image for MarcusAntonius
MarcusAntonius

15667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#280 MarcusAntonius
Member since 2004 • 15667 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]

[QUOTE="fillini"]Nope not what I said. He said "with THEIR money". so i was just stating that it their tax FREE money that the illegally worked here for thats all.

And if your going to let immigrants purchase their Health Care with tax free money why not let the actually citizens of that country do so also??????

fillini

...they...pay...taxes

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=881584

Read it. I actually agree with a some of the assertions she tries to make. Couldn't access the footnotes, so its sounds like a blog from a lawyer in San Francisco to me. So I have to disagree, all my personal experience and financial reading state other wise, concerning the economic impact of illegals. out of the 12 illegals I know personally NONE have ever paid their taxes. i have asked them if any of their people pay taxes and the say very few. they said ones that do are the families that hae lived her for years. These guys don't do anything period. they may go out every once in a while but there are like 8 or ten guys sharing a 19inch tv in a two or 3 bedroom apartment.

Like the tax code could actually be enforced on illegals.:lol: What nonsense.

Avatar image for tycoonmike
tycoonmike

6082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#281 tycoonmike
Member since 2005 • 6082 Posts

Oh, please. That's no worse than some of the crap you see on television with foreign parliaments and congresses actually duking it out over a piece of legislature. If I remember correctly, there was a clip on a show off of TruTV where parliament in South Korea actually did erupt into a melee free-for-all. The beauty of it is that we laugh at other countries when this happens, but when someone shouts something over here, we react as though they're the harbingers of plague.

Avatar image for MarcusAntonius
MarcusAntonius

15667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#282 MarcusAntonius
Member since 2004 • 15667 Posts

Oh, please. That's no worse than some of the crap you see on television with foreign parliaments and congresses actually duking it out over a piece of legislature. If I remember correctly, there was a clip on a show off of TruTV where parliament in South Korea actually did erupt into a melee free-for-all. The beauty of it is that we laugh at other countries when this happens, but when someone shouts something over here, we react as though they're the harbingers of plague.

tycoonmike

The phony outrage is crystal clear here. Nothing this Congressman did is unprecedented. That's likely why this non-story is already dying out, as it should.

Avatar image for needled24-7
needled24-7

15902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#283 needled24-7
Member since 2007 • 15902 Posts

Oh, please. That's no worse than some of the crap you see on television with foreign parliaments and congresses actually duking it out over a piece of legislature. If I remember correctly, there was a clip on a show off of TruTV where parliament in South Korea actually did erupt into a melee free-for-all. The beauty of it is that we laugh at other countries when this happens, but when someone shouts something over here, we react as though they're the harbingers of plague.

tycoonmike

aye, it's cause we are Americans, we don't know any better :D

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#284 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts

Oh, please. That's no worse than some of the crap you see on television with foreign parliaments and congresses actually duking it out over a piece of legislature. If I remember correctly, there was a clip on a show off of TruTV where parliament in South Korea actually did erupt into a melee free-for-all. The beauty of it is that we laugh at other countries when this happens, but when someone shouts something over here, we react as though they're the harbingers of plague.

tycoonmike
South Korea does a lot of things. I don't think that alone deems what is acceptable.
Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#285 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts
According to CRS: "There could be instances where some family members would meet the definition of an eligible individual for purposes of the credit, while other family members would not. For example, in a family consisting of a U.S. citizen married to an unauthorized alien and a U.S. citizen child, the U.S. citizen spouse and child could meet the criteria for being a credit-eligible individual, while the unauthorized alien spouse would not meet the criteria. H.R. 3200 does not expressly address how such a situation would be treated. Therefore, it appears that the Health Choices Commissioner would be responsible for determining how the credits would be administered in the case of mixed-status families."

What part of this are people not understanding? Oh yeah, back in July a congressman attempted to add checks to the program by implementing SAVE, which would have prevented illegals from receiving affordability credits which was defeated by the House Ways and Means Committee. Dubious, indeed. H.R. 3200 is rife with loopholes waiting to be exploited.

The bill is needlessly complex and with the way that its being rushed are causes for alarm.

MarcusAntonius
No offense intended, but I think it is you who aren't understanding what you're quoting. That's why I said in my previous post that your own source proves my assertion. Let's take it line by line: "There could be instances where some family members would meet the definition of an eligible individual for purposes of the credit, while other family members would not. For example, in a family consisting of a U.S. citizen married to an unauthorized alien and a U.S. citizen child, the U.S. citizen spouse and child could meet the criteria for being a credit-eligible individual, while the unauthorized alien spouse would not meet the criteria. " Yes. I acknowledged that in my previous post. Heck, I've stated this in my previous ten posts or so. Family members of illegal immigrants who are themselves here legally could be covered "while the unauthorized alien spouse would not meet the criteria".



"H.R. 3200 does not expressly address how such a situation would be treated. Therefore, it appears that the Health Choices Commissioner would be responsible for determining how the credits would be administered in the case of mixed-status families" Since H.R. 3200 DOES explicitly state that no assistance will be given to illegal immigrants, it is nearly a certainty that what would end up happening is that the legal family members would get the assistance of the health care reform bill in the form of subsidized insurance if they fell far enough below the poverty line whereas the illegal immigrant, if he wanted coverage at all, would have to pay full price. This bill has been in negotiation for over six months now. It is hardly "being rushed". My previous points remain still valid: 1. The bill explicitly states that illegal immigrants would not be provided any assistance and/or given insurance 2. It does NOT explicitly state that illegal immigrants couldn't acquire insurance on their own 3. Illegal immigrants buying insurance - particularly at full price - is ultimately good for EVERYONE because otherwise they really DO end up with free healthcare, in the form of showing up at an emergency room or hospital critically sick where, by law, they have to be treated. This is then passed along in the form of higher costs to the people who DO have insurance. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
Avatar image for tycoonmike
tycoonmike

6082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#286 tycoonmike
Member since 2005 • 6082 Posts

[QUOTE="tycoonmike"]

Oh, please. That's no worse than some of the crap you see on television with foreign parliaments and congresses actually duking it out over a piece of legislature. If I remember correctly, there was a clip on a show off of TruTV where parliament in South Korea actually did erupt into a melee free-for-all. The beauty of it is that we laugh at other countries when this happens, but when someone shouts something over here, we react as though they're the harbingers of plague.

duxup

South Korea does a lot of things. I don't think that alone deems what is acceptable.

So then you're saying we're justified in laughing at the antics of other parliaments, calling them rowdy and disorderly, and when one of our representatives yells one phrase at our prewsident it's unacceptable? I'm sorry, but that reeks of a double standard.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#287 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="fillini"]

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] ...they...pay...taxes

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=881584

MarcusAntonius

Read it. I actually agree with a some of the assertions she tries to make. Couldn't access the footnotes, so its sounds like a blog from a lawyer in San Francisco to me. So I have to disagree, all my personal experience and financial reading state other wise, concerning the economic impact of illegals. out of the 12 illegals I know personally NONE have ever paid their taxes. i have asked them if any of their people pay taxes and the say very few. they said ones that do are the families that hae lived her for years. These guys don't do anything period. they may go out every once in a while but there are like 8 or ten guys sharing a 19inch tv in a two or 3 bedroom apartment.

Like the tax code could actually be enforced on illegals.:lol: What nonsense.

Did you actually read the paper or are you just ridiculing reality because it is not in harmony with your own personal perception of the world?
Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#288 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts

[QUOTE="fillini"]

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] ...they...pay...taxes

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=881584

MarcusAntonius

Read it. I actually agree with a some of the assertions she tries to make. Couldn't access the footnotes, so its sounds like a blog from a lawyer in San Francisco to me. So I have to disagree, all my personal experience and financial reading state other wise, concerning the economic impact of illegals. out of the 12 illegals I know personally NONE have ever paid their taxes. i have asked them if any of their people pay taxes and the say very few. they said ones that do are the families that hae lived her for years. These guys don't do anything period. they may go out every once in a while but there are like 8 or ten guys sharing a 19inch tv in a two or 3 bedroom apartment.

Like the tax code could actually be enforced on illegals.:lol: What nonsense.

Sun-Tzu's link to a 58 page study by Harvard Law University that includes the opinions of most of the prominent economists nationwide is less valid than your one-sentence disbelief and preconceived notions?
Avatar image for moose_knuckler
moose_knuckler

5722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#290 moose_knuckler
Member since 2007 • 5722 Posts
Wow that's lame. Although I think this healthcare bill should be thrown out, if I were a Rep. I wouldn't yell "Liar!" in a joint session of Congress. It's getting to the point now where majority of the media will cover this type of attitude (at Congress and those Town Hall meeting) over some of the issues with the bill.
Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#291 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts
Erm... I don't really understand why people are getting so het up about this. :?
Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#292 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

He made a fool of himself, but I am glad to see a congressman shout how he feels to the president. Also atleast he didn't throw a shoe.

Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#293 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts
Well folks...time for me to be off for a bit. I need to research and set my fantasy football lineup for this week before the start of the Steelers/Titans game. While we may not all agree on Health Care reform, I take solace in the fact that most people of good faith can come together around the general premise the Fantasy Football rocks.
Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#294 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts

He made a fool of himself, but I am glad to see a congressman shout how he feels to the president. Also atleast he didn't throw a shoe.

Mercenary848
One last comment before I slide out, because I've seen the "at least he didn't throw a shoe" comment quite a lot in this thread. There's a bit of a difference between some angry Iraqi journalist over in the middle east throwing a shoe during a speech Bush is giving overseas and a sitting U.S. Congressman interrupting the president and calling him a liar during a national television address to the nation in the halls of Congress.
Avatar image for Lindsosaurus
Lindsosaurus

1982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#295 Lindsosaurus
Member since 2009 • 1982 Posts

[QUOTE="Mercenary848"]

He made a fool of himself, but I am glad to see a congressman shout how he feels to the president. Also atleast he didn't throw a shoe.

nocoolnamejim

One last comment before I slide out, because I've seen the "at least he didn't throw a shoe" comment quite a lot in this thread. There's a bit of a difference between some angry Iraqi journalist over in the middle east throwing a shoe during a speech Bush is giving overseas and a sitting U.S. Congressman interrupting the president and calling him a liar during a national television address to the nation in the halls of Congress.

Agreed. That makes a big difference. Not to mention that the the rules of congress explicitly state that they cannot call the President a liar.

Avatar image for MarcusAntonius
MarcusAntonius

15667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#296 MarcusAntonius
Member since 2004 • 15667 Posts

[QUOTE="MarcusAntonius"]

[QUOTE="fillini"] Read it. I actually agree with a some of the assertions she tries to make. Couldn't access the footnotes, so its sounds like a blog from a lawyer in San Francisco to me. So I have to disagree, all my personal experience and financial reading state other wise, concerning the economic impact of illegals. out of the 12 illegals I know personally NONE have ever paid their taxes. i have asked them if any of their people pay taxes and the say very few. they said ones that do are the families that hae lived her for years. These guys don't do anything period. they may go out every once in a while but there are like 8 or ten guys sharing a 19inch tv in a two or 3 bedroom apartment.

nocoolnamejim

Like the tax code could actually be enforced on illegals.:lol: What nonsense.

Sun-Tzu's link to a 58 page study by Harvard Law University that includes the opinions of most of the prominent economists nationwide is less valid than your one-sentence disbelief and preconceived notions?

No, I read it. There is no way that any of the numbers can be substantiated without IRS records, NONE. I read that paper, "hundreds of thousands going out of their way to file" in the face of 20-30 million illegals isn't what I would call illegals paying taxes, oustide of sales tax.

Avatar image for fillini
fillini

857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#297 fillini
Member since 2004 • 857 Posts

[QUOTE="fillini"]

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] ...they...pay...taxes

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=881584

-Sun_Tzu-

Read it. I actually agree with a some of the assertions she tries to make. Couldn't access the footnotes, so its sounds like a blog from a lawyer in San Francisco to me. So I have to disagree, all my personal experience and financial reading state other wise, concerning the economic impact of illegals. out of the 12 illegals I know personally NONE have ever paid their taxes. i have asked them if any of their people pay taxes and the say very few. they said ones that do are the families that hae lived her for years. These guys don't do anything period. they may go out every once in a while but there are like 8 or ten guys sharing a 19inch tv in a two or 3 bedroom apartment.

Well, I linked just the abstract, but if you want to read the entire 58 page analysis, footnotes and all, be my guest.

http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/llr/vol9/lipman.pdf

Also, a side note, I wouldn't base sweeping generalization off of anecdotal evidence.

Anecdotal evidence? Please explain.

Is that like your assertion two weeks about how Social Security is just fine; and then Washington announced the next week no COLA for the next two years. Yeah one of their excuses was the seniors got the stimulus money. $250.

And yes I'll read ALL 58 pages.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#298 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="MarcusAntonius"]

Like the tax code could actually be enforced on illegals.:lol: What nonsense.

MarcusAntonius

Did you actually read the paper or are you just ridiculing reality because it is not in harmony with your own personal perception of the world?

I think you mistake me for some partisan. No, I mock the premise. We can't enforce our immigration law, but we can enforce our tax code? I'm supposed to buy into it because a Harvard grad student says so?

So it appears to be the latter. Dismissing a paper because of who wrote it, as if it was just the author's opinion, and because the premise is not harmonious with your preconceived notions about the issue of illegal immigration is not only a fallacious way of thinking, but an arrogant one. Also, the paper wasn't written by a Harvard grad student, but rather a professor at Chapman University of Law, and you should really considering "buying into" a premise when the facts support said premise, instead of just making casual, superficial inferences and equivocations.

Avatar image for Grodus5
Grodus5

7934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#299 Grodus5
Member since 2006 • 7934 Posts

I feel so proud to be a South Carolinian... why didn't I move to Denver... or Hershey... when I had the chance?

Avatar image for fillini
fillini

857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#300 fillini
Member since 2004 • 857 Posts

[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"][QUOTE="Mercenary848"]

He made a fool of himself, but I am glad to see a congressman shout how he feels to the president. Also atleast he didn't throw a shoe.

Lindsosaurus

One last comment before I slide out, because I've seen the "at least he didn't throw a shoe" comment quite a lot in this thread. There's a bit of a difference between some angry Iraqi journalist over in the middle east throwing a shoe during a speech Bush is giving overseas and a sitting U.S. Congressman interrupting the president and calling him a liar during a national television address to the nation in the halls of Congress.

Agreed. That makes a big difference. Not to mention that the the rules of congress explicitly state that they cannot call the President a liar.

Both true. Now that he's apologized and Pres. Obama accepted is there a need for censure?