French Senate passes ban on full Muslim veils

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]You're not allowed to go around naked in France, so why should you be allowed to go around fully covered up?Sajo7
:lol: Suddenly I want to demand my right to walk around nude.

I know, right? All the people who support women covering themselves up fully should also support people if they wish to walk around fully nude and with just as much vigour to boot.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

[QUOTE="GazaAli"][QUOTE="DraugenCP"]

Frankly, playing the'bank robber' card is the only safe way of outlawing it since it's the only one that won't get you in trouble with EU legislation. This a small part of the problem, though. The essential problem is not 'fear', but the fact that women who wear these scarves are limiting themselves extremely within a society such as the French one. And in these times, we just can't allow that immigrants willingly exclude themselves and live at our expense.

DraugenCP

Are you implying that women wearing the viel do not work? and they survive on tax payers money?

Yes, women wearing burkas (so not veils in general) will probably not find a job if they insist on keeping on their burka on all occasions, not to mention that as being more hardline muslims they probably want to focus more on raising kids anyway.

So? its their choice if they do not want to work and want to be full time house wives. Its not like jobs are all over the place. Also, Muslims have a different culture in that men are the main bread winners in families.
Avatar image for SaudiFury
SaudiFury

8709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 1

#153 SaudiFury
Member since 2007 • 8709 Posts

My question is this to the Europeans out there.. or perhaps anyone with any knowledge out there.

How come when i visit Muslim communities in the United States. In Texas, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illanois and then random encounters i've had in California and other states. I strongly get the impression that they're assimilate quite well with American culture. about the only notiiceable difference you'll see with the women is that the majority wear the hijab.

(i could probably provide more pics...)

but point is, in their language, what they talk about and even what they wear (with one difference being possibly wearing the hijab in some fashion) they're basically Americans who are Muslims. people who come from all corners of the Earth. In the photos i provided alone, one is Yemeni-Saudi, Somali, Malay, and Nigeria. There are like an extremely few women i have ever seen (once in a blue moon in Minnesota) a woman wearing the niqaba and whole covering.

So my main question is why is it America and Canada can assimilate and incorporate various people very well. where as Europe seems to at best just open the door at the immigration?

(just for some lulz)

Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#154 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]You're a bit extreme, aren't you? Killing people or banning whole religions is not the case here. That's in a whole other league. Banning an article of clothing in public is what we are talking about.

EdenProxy

Ana rticle of clothing that happens to be associated with a rather large religion that a rather large amount of people don't like at the moment. It starts at "You can't wear burqas" and ends at "You can't be a Muslim."

So if I start a religion where I must fire a gun with a blank in the air at large crowds everyday at 5pm youll be ok. No ones in danger its a blank I should have the freedom to do as I like

The standard reaction to a normal person if a lound sudden unexpected noise is heard is panic/jump. A gun being shot would cause panic and possible danger.

A veil, by comparison, cannot. I have seen women in full veils. I did not panic. It's about as scary to me as the guys on street corners dressed like Uncle Sam.

Also, arn't Party clowns kinda illegal too? I can't identify a guy in a rainbow wig with 5 pounds of make up on and a fake red nose.

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

ARE YOU SERIOUSLY.. Trying to compare THOSE to which you can see half of their face to some of the more extreme versions of the veil..http://observers.france24.com/files/images/total.jpgIn which you can't even identifiy which sex they are? Or their eye color?

sSubZerOo

So you can't identify them? Okay. Thought so. You can't seriously ban the veil without also banning these articles of clothing.

...................... What in the hell are you talking about? We are able to tell several facial features except their eyes.. We can tell what sex they are.. and numerous other characteristics.. You can't seriously be argueing that there is no difference between this? When a police artist sketches something, its going to be far more detailed then a person like the veil I showed you.. So yet again.. Not a good comparison..

There is no difference. You can't identify them. Oh, you can identify some features? So too with the burqa: Height, approximate weight, the sound of their voice, their figure, etc.
Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"][QUOTE="GazaAli"]Now we begin to talk whatever we want. first the Quran says nothing about the veil. Second, I did not know majority means legitimacy. Third, I thought the west is about absolute freedom.GazaAli
Don't generalise the West, or people will generalise the Middle East. >.>

where is the generalization in that post?

I emphasised the bit that I am talking about. :)

Avatar image for Filthybastrd
Filthybastrd

7124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 Filthybastrd
Member since 2009 • 7124 Posts

As far as I'm concerned, the Niqab is a means of opressing women.

"blablabla, they may actually want to"...

Don't tell me anyone could possibly want to dress like this unless being specifically brought up to that mindset.

Avatar image for metroidfood
metroidfood

11175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 metroidfood
Member since 2007 • 11175 Posts

So if I start a religion where I must fire a gun with a blank in the air at large crowds everyday at 5pm youll be ok. No ones in danger its a blank I should have the freedom to do as I likeEdenProxy

Firing a gun in the air causes panic. I can't start a religion that requires people to shout "FIRE!" in a crowded theater either. The point is, both of these put people in danger.

The burqa does not constitute a safety risk as long as they identify themselves at security checkpoints.

Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#159 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

Actually yeah if the mask is fully distorting their views they can be arrested or very least ticketed..

LJS9502_basic

Bull. Crap. School mascots, store mascots, zoo mascots, sports mascots; all are illegal by your logic--yet none of them are ACTUALLY ILLEGAL.

None of those mascots can walk around in public in those masks. There are allowed at specific places. And one can cover their face at home...or friends homes if they like. NOT in public. This is NOT a new idea.

Again, I see these type of mascots in public all the time in my city. They are never ticketed.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#160 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="metroidfood"]

A. It's not Halloween, this was Improve Everywhere who staged this in New York in the middle of May.

B. How is a gathered protest in public different from walking around by yourself in public when it comes to wearing a mask? Suddenly, several people are doing it so it's okay?

grape_of_wrath

Yeah because the law is specifically there monitoring it.. Seriously if you want to know what I mean.. Please go into a store and walk around public during fall wearing a ski mask.. Lets go see how far you get..

'Go out and let's see how far you get' is not a legal argument..... Can you,or any others who share your arguments(picking your posts is a coincidence...) provide legal evidence? I haven't heard about banning articles of clothing in western countires, before....

http://blogs.findlaw.com/legally_weird/2010/02/tampa-man-arrested-for-wearing-clown-mask-in-public.html

Anydisguise in public is illegal, authoritiessaid.Even on Halloween, adults aren't allowed to enter any businesses or stores with their faces covered.

In the US its usually by a state by state thing.

Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#162 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

Guns kill people. Clothes do not. See the difference yet?

Theokhoth

No, irresponsible people kill, not the gun, as it requires something to operate it...doesn't have to be a gun either - a knife, spear, machete.

We don't believe in punishing lawful gun owners, just criminals who commit crimes with a weapon.

Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#163 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

As far as I'm concerned, the Niqab is a means of opressing women.

"blablabla, they may actually want to"...

Don't tell me anyone could possibly want to dress like this unless being specifically brought up to that mindset.

Filthybastrd

"No one could possibly want to do something I wouldn't want to do! It's not like there are 6 billion people on the planet with different mindsets!"

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

Actually yeah if the mask is fully distorting their views they can be arrested or very least ticketed..

LJS9502_basic

Bull. Crap. School mascots, store mascots, zoo mascots, sports mascots; all are illegal by your logic--yet none of them are ACTUALLY ILLEGAL.

None of those mascots can walk around in public in those masks. There are allowed at specific places. And one can cover their face at home...or friends homes if they like. NOT in public. This is NOT a new idea.

They can walk in public and do all the time; I see them on my sidewalk every week (hell, I've ESCORTED ONE in public in a full lion suit).

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"] What the majority want does not matter. At all. If the majority wants to kill the gays thyen they can't do that. If the majority wants to ban the practice of Islam then they can't do that. Majority rule =/= Western society.Theokhoth
You're a bit extreme, aren't you? Killing people or banning whole religions is not the case here. That's in a whole other league. Banning an article of clothing in public is what we are talking about.

Ana rticle of clothing that happens to be associated with a rather large religion that a rather large amount of people don't like at the moment. It starts at "You can't wear burqas" and ends at "You can't be a Muslim."

Let's talk again when that actually happens. France has always been known to not be too fond of religions. It's a pretty secular country.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180248 Posts

[QUOTE="EdenProxy"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"] Ana rticle of clothing that happens to be associated with a rather large religion that a rather large amount of people don't like at the moment. It starts at "You can't wear burqas" and ends at "You can't be a Muslim."Pixel-Pirate

So if I start a religion where I must fire a gun with a blank in the air at large crowds everyday at 5pm youll be ok. No ones in danger its a blank I should have the freedom to do as I like

The standard reaction to a normal person if a lound sudden unexpected noise is heard is panic/jump. A gun being shot would cause panic and possible danger.

A veil, by comparison, cannot. I have seen women in full veils. I did not panic. It's about as scary to me as the guys on street corners dressed like Uncle Sam.

Also, arn't Party clowns kinda illegal too? I can't identify a guy in a rainbow wig with 5 pounds of make up on and a fake red nose.

From a safety standard if you allowed facial covering then anyone can freely do so and that could cause problems with the criminal element. I don't think faces should be hidden for that reason.
Avatar image for metroidfood
metroidfood

11175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 metroidfood
Member since 2007 • 11175 Posts

I know, right? All the people who support women covering themselves up fully should also support people if they wish to walk around fully nude and with just as much vigour to boot.

Hexagon_777

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#168 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]

Guns kill people. Clothes do not. See the difference yet?

topsemag55

No, irresponsible people kill, not the gun, as it requires something to operate it...doesn't have to be a gun either - a knife, spear, machete.

We don't believe in punishing lawful gun owners, just criminals who commit crimes with a weapon.

. . . Yet you support banning clothes because, hey, people who wear a certain article of clothing must be out to kill. :| Do you not see the hypocrisy here yet?
Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

[QUOTE="GazaAli"][QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]Don't generalise the West, or people will generalise the Middle East. >.>

grape_of_wrath

where is the generalization in that post?

'The west is about absolute freedom'-is a generalisation. Let me correct you-it isn't....if there's a place that comes close to absolute freedom-it's somalia....

Don't you guys always brag about freedom of speech, adultry and such things :?

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#170 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"] So you can't identify them? Okay. Thought so. You can't seriously ban the veil without also banning these articles of clothing. Theokhoth

...................... What in the hell are you talking about? We are able to tell several facial features except their eyes.. We can tell what sex they are.. and numerous other characteristics.. You can't seriously be argueing that there is no difference between this? When a police artist sketches something, its going to be far more detailed then a person like the veil I showed you.. So yet again.. Not a good comparison..

There is no difference. You can't identify them. Oh, you can identify some features? So too with the burqa: Height, approximate weight, the sound of their voice, their figure, etc.

............... This is pretty face palm worthy.. If you want to go that far, no often times you can't judge their weight due to their garb.. But your going far out of there.. As I have said earlier there is a immense difference.. I am able to identify the person much more readily in a line up with shades on then any where close to the veil which can go as far as having a black cloth over their entire face even over their eyes.. There is no comparing it WHAT so ever. Because even with the glasses a large majoriyt of their face is still visible.. While with some veils absolutely nothing is visible.

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#171 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]You're a bit extreme, aren't you? Killing people or banning whole religions is not the case here. That's in a whole other league. Banning an article of clothing in public is what we are talking about.Hexagon_777

Ana rticle of clothing that happens to be associated with a rather large religion that a rather large amount of people don't like at the moment. It starts at "You can't wear burqas" and ends at "You can't be a Muslim."

Let's talk again when that actually happens. France has always been known to not be too fond of religions. It's a pretty secular country.

The idea behind democracy is to make sure it doesn't happen in the first place.
Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#172 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

[QUOTE="EdenProxy"] So if I start a religion where I must fire a gun with a blank in the air at large crowds everyday at 5pm youll be ok. No ones in danger its a blank I should have the freedom to do as I likeLJS9502_basic

The standard reaction to a normal person if a lound sudden unexpected noise is heard is panic/jump. A gun being shot would cause panic and possible danger.

A veil, by comparison, cannot. I have seen women in full veils. I did not panic. It's about as scary to me as the guys on street corners dressed like Uncle Sam.

Also, arn't Party clowns kinda illegal too? I can't identify a guy in a rainbow wig with 5 pounds of make up on and a fake red nose.

From a safety standard if you allowed facial covering then anyone can freely do so and that could cause problems with the criminal element. I don't think faces should be hidden for that reason.

Yet they are. Seriously, comparing SHOOTING GUNS to covering the face as having the same or a similar impact is pretty silly.

Avatar image for grape_of_wrath
grape_of_wrath

3756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 grape_of_wrath
Member since 2009 • 3756 Posts

[QUOTE="Sajo7"][QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]You're not allowed to go around naked in France, so why should you be allowed to go around fully covered up?Hexagon_777

:lol: Suddenly I want to demand my right to walk around nude.

I know, right? All the people who support women covering themselves up fully should also support people if they wish to walk around fully nude and with just as much vigour to boot.

You'll be surprsied to find,then, that in the majority of the western world-nudity is not outlawed.....Indecent exposure/behaviour usually takes more than walking around naked...being naked on iteslf,again not everywhere, is not illegal...
Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#174 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

[QUOTE="topsemag55"]

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]

Guns kill people. Clothes do not. See the difference yet?

Theokhoth

No, irresponsible people kill, not the gun, as it requires something to operate it...doesn't have to be a gun either - a knife, spear, machete.

We don't believe in punishing lawful gun owners, just criminals who commit crimes with a weapon.

. . . Yet you support banning clothes because, hey, people who wear a certain article of clothing must be out to kill. :| Do you not see the hypocrisy here yet?

I humbly suggest you look over the thread...where did I post that I support this?

Avatar image for SaudiFury
SaudiFury

8709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 1

#175 SaudiFury
Member since 2007 • 8709 Posts

As far as I'm concerned, the Niqab is a means of opressing women.

"blablabla, they may actually want to"...

Don't tell me anyone could possibly want to dress like this unless being specifically brought up to that mindset.

Filthybastrd

The term i think your thinking of is called Socialization.

but before you judge. i'd recommend reading on the word Ethnocentrism as well (everyone is guilty of it if you've been raised mainly in only one society).

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#176 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

The standard reaction to a normal person if a lound sudden unexpected noise is heard is panic/jump. A gun being shot would cause panic and possible danger.

A veil, by comparison, cannot. I have seen women in full veils. I did not panic. It's about as scary to me as the guys on street corners dressed like Uncle Sam.

Also, arn't Party clowns kinda illegal too? I can't identify a guy in a rainbow wig with 5 pounds of make up on and a fake red nose.

Pixel-Pirate

From a safety standard if you allowed facial covering then anyone can freely do so and that could cause problems with the criminal element. I don't think faces should be hidden for that reason.

Yet they are. Seriously, comparing SHOOTING GUNS to covering the face as having the same or a similar impact is pretty silly.

Yet your allowed to own a gun.. And through this law you should be allowed to go around any where you please with a ski mask.. You don't see a problem with this what so ever?

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"] What the majority want does not matter. At all. If the majority wants to kill the gays thyen they can't do that. If the majority wants to ban the practice of Islam then they can't do that. Majority rule =/= Western society.EdenProxy
You're a bit extreme, aren't you? Killing people or banning whole religions is not the case here. That's in a whole other league. Banning an article of clothing in public is what we are talking about.

Its not about the clothing. Its about what the clothing does. And what it does is makes the person completely anonymous

That I understand. I personally feel uncomfortable with regards to the sight of any individual or group that is fully covered up for I deem it as threatening and antisocial. I am, of course, a racist bigot because of that, but what am I to do? I wouldn't feel comfortable with a fully nude individual or group either! There must be something seriously wrong with me. I am supposed to endorse freedom of everything because I live in the West, right?

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

...................... What in the hell are you talking about? We are able to tell several facial features except their eyes.. We can tell what sex they are.. and numerous other characteristics.. You can't seriously be argueing that there is no difference between this? When a police artist sketches something, its going to be far more detailed then a person like the veil I showed you.. So yet again.. Not a good comparison..

sSubZerOo

There is no difference. You can't identify them. Oh, you can identify some features? So too with the burqa: Height, approximate weight, the sound of their voice, their figure, etc.

............... This is pretty face palm worthy.. If you want to go that far, no often times you can't judge their weight due to their garb.. But your going far out of there.. As I have said earlier there is a immense difference.. I am able to identify the person much more readily in a line up with shades on then any where close to the veil which can go as far as having a black cloth over their entire face even over their eyes.. There is no comparing it WHAT so ever.

Veil: "I can't identify them, so it should be illegal." Everything else: "I can't identify them, but it's not the same thing!"
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180248 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"] Bull. Crap. School mascots, store mascots, zoo mascots, sports mascots; all are illegal by your logic--yet none of them are ACTUALLY ILLEGAL.Theokhoth

None of those mascots can walk around in public in those masks. There are allowed at specific places. And one can cover their face at home...or friends homes if they like. NOT in public. This is NOT a new idea.

They can walk in public and do all the time; I see them on my sidewalk every week (hell, I've ESCORTED ONE in public in a full lion suit).

No it's not done all the time...it's never done here.
Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts
@ Saudifury :lol: man I get your picture, but I don't think the rest of the member are going to.
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] From a safety standard if you allowed facial covering then anyone can freely do so and that could cause problems with the criminal element. I don't think faces should be hidden for that reason.sSubZerOo

Yet they are. Seriously, comparing SHOOTING GUNS to covering the face as having the same or a similar impact is pretty silly.

Yet your allowed to own a gun.. And through this law you should be allowed to go around any where you please with a ski mask.. You don't see a problem with this what so ever?

You have yet to demonstrate that it's actually illegal to wear a ski mask in public.
Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#182 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] From a safety standard if you allowed facial covering then anyone can freely do so and that could cause problems with the criminal element. I don't think faces should be hidden for that reason.sSubZerOo

Yet they are. Seriously, comparing SHOOTING GUNS to covering the face as having the same or a similar impact is pretty silly.

Yet your allowed to own a gun.. And through this law you should be allowed to go around any where you please with a ski mask.. You don't see a problem with this what so ever?

No.

I'm already allowed in several states to go around everywhere with a lethal device on my persons. I'd say that is far more threatening to public safety.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#183 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="Filthybastrd"]

As far as I'm concerned, the Niqab is a means of opressing women.

"blablabla, they may actually want to"...

Don't tell me anyone could possibly want to dress like this unless being specifically brought up to that mindset.

SaudiFury

The term i think your thinking of is called Socialization.

but before you judge. i'd recommend reading on the word Ethnocentrism as well (everyone is guilty of it if you've been raised mainly in only one society).

Yes but yet again you can't help pointing out that this garb is most popular and used in places like Saudi Arabia and Iran.. Not in places like Egypt.. Furthermore if we are going to make this suggestion why is female circumcision banned? Where the women who do it fully believe its their passage to adulthood.. Its painful? There are quite a few rights of passages that are painful that people agree to do.. This is hardly a excuse.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#184 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

Yeah, just look at this terrorist hiding in plain sight.

metroidfood


Granted of course, that it isn't Halloween every day of the year, and anyone wearing a plastic mask in public is usually seen as very suspicious (how many times have people robbed banks wearing Richard Nixon masks?). As a security guard, I have come to understand why this is a threat to security. If a police officer is chasing a suspect whom they can identify by means of the face, then what is stopping them from adorning a Muslim veil and hiding among a group of women in plain sight? Or if someone comes onto my site wearing something covering their face, and I have to identify them in order to allow them access (via ID badge), then what is stopping someone from stealing the ID badge and playing impostor?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#185 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180248 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

The standard reaction to a normal person if a lound sudden unexpected noise is heard is panic/jump. A gun being shot would cause panic and possible danger.

A veil, by comparison, cannot. I have seen women in full veils. I did not panic. It's about as scary to me as the guys on street corners dressed like Uncle Sam.

Also, arn't Party clowns kinda illegal too? I can't identify a guy in a rainbow wig with 5 pounds of make up on and a fake red nose.

Pixel-Pirate

From a safety standard if you allowed facial covering then anyone can freely do so and that could cause problems with the criminal element. I don't think faces should be hidden for that reason.

Yet they are. Seriously, comparing SHOOTING GUNS to covering the face as having the same or a similar impact is pretty silly.

Since I never stated that I have no idea why you brought it up. However, there is a public safety issue with covered faces. Period.
Avatar image for ImaPirate0202
ImaPirate0202

4473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#186 ImaPirate0202
Member since 2005 • 4473 Posts

I've always wondered how the women really feel about wearing those things.

Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#187 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]None of those mascots can walk around in public in those masks. There are allowed at specific places. And one can cover their face at home...or friends homes if they like. NOT in public. This is NOT a new idea.LJS9502_basic

They can walk in public and do all the time; I see them on my sidewalk every week (hell, I've ESCORTED ONE in public in a full lion suit).

No it's not done all the time...it's never done here.

As stated, it seems to vary from state to state. It is definetly legal where I live. It may be illegal in another state, however.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#188 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

Yet they are. Seriously, comparing SHOOTING GUNS to covering the face as having the same or a similar impact is pretty silly.

Theokhoth

Yet your allowed to own a gun.. And through this law you should be allowed to go around any where you please with a ski mask.. You don't see a problem with this what so ever?

You have yet to demonstrate that it's actually illegal to wear a ski mask in public.

I just posted one in which the Florida Authorities was quoted that is illegal to walk into a place of business or public area wearing a ski masks or other such related thing.

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#190 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts
[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]None of those mascots can walk around in public in those masks. There are allowed at specific places. And one can cover their face at home...or friends homes if they like. NOT in public. This is NOT a new idea.LJS9502_basic

They can walk in public and do all the time; I see them on my sidewalk every week (hell, I've ESCORTED ONE in public in a full lion suit).

No it's not done all the time...it's never done here.

Go to the local zoo or wherever a jewelry shop is being opened then. It's not illegal whatsoever.
Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#191 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] From a safety standard if you allowed facial covering then anyone can freely do so and that could cause problems with the criminal element. I don't think faces should be hidden for that reason.LJS9502_basic

Yet they are. Seriously, comparing SHOOTING GUNS to covering the face as having the same or a similar impact is pretty silly.

Since I never stated that I have no idea why you brought it up. However, there is a public safety issue with covered faces. Period.

I brought it up because the person I quoted, the reason I originally wrote what you quoted, compared wearing a veil to shooting blanks in a crowded area.

Avatar image for DJ-Lafleur
DJ-Lafleur

35604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#192 DJ-Lafleur
Member since 2007 • 35604 Posts

What if a woman actually WANTS to wear a full Muslim veil?

A ban is going too far here.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#193 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

Yet they are. Seriously, comparing SHOOTING GUNS to covering the face as having the same or a similar impact is pretty silly.

Pixel-Pirate

Yet your allowed to own a gun.. And through this law you should be allowed to go around any where you please with a ski mask.. You don't see a problem with this what so ever?

No.

I'm already allowed in several states to go around everywhere with a lethal device on my persons. I'd say that is far more threatening to public safety.

Except you can not be readily identified, in which criminals usually use during their acts..

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#194 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

Yet they are. Seriously, comparing SHOOTING GUNS to covering the face as having the same or a similar impact is pretty silly.

Pixel-Pirate

Since I never stated that I have no idea why you brought it up. However, there is a public safety issue with covered faces. Period.

I brought it up because the person I quoted, the reason I originally wrote what you quoted, compared wearing a veil to shooting blanks in a crowded area.

You don't think walking into a store wearing a ski mask will cause panic as well? How bout several people walking in at once?

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#195 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"][QUOTE="Sajo7"] :lol: Suddenly I want to demand my right to walk around nude.grape_of_wrath
I know, right? All the people who support women covering themselves up fully should also support people if they wish to walk around fully nude and with just as much vigour to boot.

You'll be surprsied to find,then, that in the majority of the western world-nudity is not outlawed.....Indecent exposure/behaviour usually takes more than walking around naked...being naked on iteslf,again not everywhere, is not illegal...

I see more covered up women than nudes. Something's up here.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#196 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180248 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

Yet your allowed to own a gun.. And through this law you should be allowed to go around any where you please with a ski mask.. You don't see a problem with this what so ever?

sSubZerOo

You have yet to demonstrate that it's actually illegal to wear a ski mask in public.

I just posted one in which the Florida Authorities was quoted that is illegal to walk into a place of business or public area wearing a ski masks or other such related thing.

We don't allow anyone is our store with the face covered....and that includes Halloween...which is usually when it's an issue.:P
Avatar image for MAZ85
MAZ85

1094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 MAZ85
Member since 2007 • 1094 Posts

I've always wondered how the women really feel about wearing those things.

ImaPirate0202
some muslim women prefer being killed rather than removing their hijab and niqab
Avatar image for grape_of_wrath
grape_of_wrath

3756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#198 grape_of_wrath
Member since 2009 • 3756 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="grape_of_wrath"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

Yeah because the law is specifically there monitoring it.. Seriously if you want to know what I mean.. Please go into a store and walk around public during fall wearing a ski mask.. Lets go see how far you get..

'Go out and let's see how far you get' is not a legal argument..... Can you,or any others who share your arguments(picking your posts is a coincidence...) provide legal evidence? I haven't heard about banning articles of clothing in western countires, before....

http://blogs.findlaw.com/legally_weird/2010/02/tampa-man-arrested-for-wearing-clown-mask-in-public.html

Anydisguise in public is illegal, authoritiessaid.Even on Halloween, adults aren't allowed to enter any businesses or stores with their faces covered.

In the US its usually by a state by state thing.

I'm going to go ahead and guess that that's an isolated incident.and considering your system of states and counties-I'll go ahead and guess it takes a very special place to do that... Most of the western world does not outlaw covering up(or complete nudity,on the other hand)....
Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#199 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

[QUOTE="Filthybastrd"]

As far as I'm concerned, the Niqab is a means of opressing women.

"blablabla, they may actually want to"...

Don't tell me anyone could possibly want to dress like this unless being specifically brought up to that mindset.

EdenProxy

"No one could possibly want to do something I wouldn't want to do! It's not like there are 6 billion people on the planet with different mindsets!"

They have that midset cause thats how they've been raised. Same with American women in the 18th and 19 centuries. They wear this because there families and society makes them.

Did you know there are people who also enjoy being hit?

Just because something sounds unpleasent to you, does not mean all 6 billion people on the planet would also dislike it. Or that, if they do like it, theres some conspiracy brainwashing going.

Don't generalize THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE as believing something. Theres really nothing that all 6 billion people agree with. Saying that the only people who could possibly want to wear that are brainwash victims/don't exist is just silly.

Avatar image for villa4europe
villa4europe

7081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#200 villa4europe
Member since 2004 • 7081 Posts

i dont think they needed to introduce a law, just ask the public to use common sense, much like im hoping the UK will do

i disagree that if they are strolling down the high street on a saturday morning they shouldnt be allowed to wear them for identification reasons, and i disagree that someone will get on their high horse and say it oppresses women as these women obviously dont have as much problem with it as the critics

what i do have a problem with is instances where it obscures vision, such as driving, instances where identification is necessary such as exams etc and instances where it involves people who are too young to understand, the idea of a teacher wearing a veil is a joke IMO as facial expression and body language is important and that is one of the few cases that has hit our media here, there isnt enough uproar to consider a law here