Jesus was Dracula!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts
[QUOTE="3picuri3"][QUOTE="Crushmaster"]
Mormons and Catholics are not Christians.
The only person who is a Christian is someone who has accepted Christ as their Lord and Savior and repented of their sins.Crushmaster
right - well I'm going to go right ahead and disagree with that. you should read portions of the bible that involve tolerance - especially of other faiths that follow Christ.


They cannot follow Christ if they are not Christians. It is impossible. And the Bible is quite clear that a person is not a Christian unless they are born again.
The Mormons and Catholics have a works-based salvation, which is completely against the teachings of Scripture.

YOUR bible is. remember there are numerous problems with translations that have happened over the years - and only one faith that i know of from religious studies took it upon themselves to retranslate from the oldest translations available - and it wasn't your faith. i don't mean any disrespect, but i don't accept anything as truth when it comes from a possibly tainted source. and there is plenty of evidence to suggest different sects of Christianity has repurposed the bible to fit more with their breed of Christianity.
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts
[QUOTE="Crushmaster"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I'm really tired of reading Catholics aren't Christians. A Christian is one who follows Christ. Catholics follow Christ. Catholics ARE Christians. Get it straight.:roll:LJS9502_basic
Christians are people who have accepted Christ as their Savior and repented of their sins. Unless one is a Christian, you cannot follow Christ. Catholics base their salvation on works. Not on Christ. Thus, they are not Christians.

You know absolutely NOTHING about Catholic beliefs. Stop spreading untruths about Catholics. In addtion....you don't understand the meaning of Christian either.

I noticed this too, unfortunately there is a lot of ignorance out there regarding Christianity.
Avatar image for supa_badman
supa_badman

16714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#54 supa_badman
Member since 2008 • 16714 Posts

oh man...

its threads like these that ruin my enjoyment of off topic threads.

Avatar image for Crushmaster
Crushmaster

4324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Crushmaster
Member since 2008 • 4324 Posts
[QUOTE="Crushmaster"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I'm really tired of reading Catholics aren't Christians. A Christian is one who follows Christ. Catholics follow Christ. Catholics ARE Christians. Get it straight.:roll:LJS9502_basic
Christians are people who have accepted Christ as their Savior and repented of their sins. Unless one is a Christian, you cannot follow Christ. Catholics base their salvation on works. Not on Christ. Thus, they are not Christians.

You know absolutely NOTHING about Catholic beliefs. Stop spreading untruths about Catholics. In addtion....you don't understand the meaning of Christian either.


Absolutely nothing? That is a ridiculous claim. Catholics believe the Sacraments - works - are salvific.
That is all I need to know (I do know more than that, but that is all that is needed at present).
And since you consider me incorrect on the meaning of a Christian, why don't you enlighten me?
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Crushmaster"]
Mormons and Catholics are not Christians.
The only person who is a Christian is someone who has accepted Christ as their Lord and Savior and repented of their sins.Crushmaster
I'm really tired of reading Catholics aren't Christians. A Christian is one who follows Christ. Catholics follow Christ. Catholics ARE Christians. Get it straight.:roll:

Christians are people who have accepted Christ as their Savior and repented of their sins. Unless one is a Christian, you cannot follow Christ. Catholics base their salvation on works. Not on Christ. Thus, they are not Christians.

based on a definition that you won't find in most bibles. let me ask you one question. being a text-based literal Christian (one who relies solely on their interpretation of the bible, as test, taken literally) have you never asked yourself why your Christian elders haven't taken it upon themselves to re-examine the older texts to see if there are issues with translation? this is a very real issue that many sects disregard, only one has taken it upon themselves to make sure their text is sound. many versions of the bible suffered serious repurposing during the dark ages / middle ages, and again when America was colonized. you'd be shocked to see how different your version might be when put against the 'real' bible, based on word-for-word translation from the oldest documents available. you cannot question the veracity as they are the oldest documents available - and they differ greatly from the quotes you're presenting in your signature. just something for you to consider.

imagine Christ were to return to find out his followers had been blindly following mistranslated / repurposed religious texts - and that very few of his followers were diligent enough to check their texts against the original Text. just some food for thought for someone that tries to say Mormons and Catholics aren't Christians based on a 'New World' translation of the Bible.

Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#57 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
I thought he was a raptor?
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180099 Posts
Absolutely nothing? That is a ridiculous claim. Catholics believe the Sacraments - works - are salvific.
That is all I need to know (I do know more than that, but that is all that is needed at present).
And since you consider me incorrect on the meaning of a Christian, why don't you enlighten me?Crushmaster
Right. Thank your for proving my point. You don't know what Catholics believe. As for Christianity...the meaning is simple. ONE WHO FOLLOWS CHRIST.
Avatar image for Crushmaster
Crushmaster

4324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Crushmaster
Member since 2008 • 4324 Posts
[QUOTE="Crushmaster"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I'm really tired of reading Catholics aren't Christians. A Christian is one who follows Christ. Catholics follow Christ. Catholics ARE Christians. Get it straight.:roll:3picuri3
Christians are people who have accepted Christ as their Savior and repented of their sins. Unless one is a Christian, you cannot follow Christ. Catholics base their salvation on works. Not on Christ. Thus, they are not Christians.

based on a definition that you won't find in most bibles. let me ask you one question. being a text-based literal Christian (one who relies solely on their interpretation of the bible, as test, taken literally) have you never asked yourself why your Christian elders haven't taken it upon themselves to re-examine the older texts to see if there are issues with translation? this is a very real issue that many sects disregard, only one has taken it upon themselves to make sure their text is sound. many versions of the bible suffered serious repurposing during the dark ages / middle ages, and again when America was colonized. you'd be shocked to see how different your version might be when put against the 'real' bible, based on word-for-word translation from the oldest documents available. you cannot question the veracity as they are the oldest documents available - and they differ greatly from the quotes you're presenting in your signature. just something for you to consider. imagine Christ were to return to find out his followers had been blindly following mistranslated / repurposed religious texts - and that very few of his followers were diligent enough to check their texts against the original Text. just some food for thought for someone that tries to say Mormons and Catholics aren't Christians based on a 'New World' translation of the Bible.

Considering that the Bible we have now has never been shown unreliable even once, I do not consider anything such as that a problem. God has miraclously preserved His Word, despite massive persecution.
Avatar image for WSP87
WSP87

667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 WSP87
Member since 2006 • 667 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Crushmaster"] Christians are people who have accepted Christ as their Savior and repented of their sins. Unless one is a Christian, you cannot follow Christ. Catholics base their salvation on works. Not on Christ. Thus, they are not Christians.Crushmaster
You know absolutely NOTHING about Catholic beliefs. Stop spreading untruths about Catholics. In addtion....you don't understand the meaning of Christian either.


Absolutely nothing? That is a ridiculous claim. Catholics believe the Sacraments - works - are salvific.
That is all I need to know (I do know more than that, but that is all that is needed at present).
And since you consider me incorrect on the meaning of a Christian, why don't you enlighten me?

Okay, look read this. He is talking about people like you for one

http://christianity.about.com/od/faqhelpdesk/f/arecatholicschr.htm

Second, It is not your place to condem anyone, that's gods job, so get off your high horse.

Third, you or any human for that matter can not state whether a person is christian or not because you know not what is in a mans heart. There is so such thing as a christian catholic. You all got offended by this hilariously obviously satirical post (It wasn't stated but COME ON!) and yet you come in here and insult Catholics? The hypocrisy here amazes me. Religion is where you find most of this.

Avatar image for Boba_Fett_3710
Boba_Fett_3710

8783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 Boba_Fett_3710
Member since 2005 • 8783 Posts
[QUOTE="Crushmaster"] Absolutely nothing? That is a ridiculous claim. Catholics believe the Sacraments - works - are salvific.
That is all I need to know (I do know more than that, but that is all that is needed at present).
And since you consider me incorrect on the meaning of a Christian, why don't you enlighten me?LJS9502_basic
Right. Thank your for proving my point. You don't know what Catholics believe. As for Christianity...the meaning is simple. ONE WHO FOLLOWS CHRIST.

Even if Christ is a vampire :o
Avatar image for Crushmaster
Crushmaster

4324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Crushmaster
Member since 2008 • 4324 Posts
[QUOTE="Crushmaster"] Absolutely nothing? That is a ridiculous claim. Catholics believe the Sacraments - works - are salvific.
That is all I need to know (I do know more than that, but that is all that is needed at present).
And since you consider me incorrect on the meaning of a Christian, why don't you enlighten me?LJS9502_basic
Right. Thank your for proving my point. You don't know what Catholics believe. As for Christianity...the meaning is simple. ONE WHO FOLLOWS CHRIST.


Excepts it is impossible to follow Christ unless you have been born again.
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts
[QUOTE="Crushmaster"][QUOTE="3picuri3"][QUOTE="Crushmaster"] Christians are people who have accepted Christ as their Savior and repented of their sins. Unless one is a Christian, you cannot follow Christ. Catholics base their salvation on works. Not on Christ. Thus, they are not Christians.

based on a definition that you won't find in most bibles. let me ask you one question. being a text-based literal Christian (one who relies solely on their interpretation of the bible, as test, taken literally) have you never asked yourself why your Christian elders haven't taken it upon themselves to re-examine the older texts to see if there are issues with translation? this is a very real issue that many sects disregard, only one has taken it upon themselves to make sure their text is sound. many versions of the bible suffered serious repurposing during the dark ages / middle ages, and again when America was colonized. you'd be shocked to see how different your version might be when put against the 'real' bible, based on word-for-word translation from the oldest documents available. you cannot question the veracity as they are the oldest documents available - and they differ greatly from the quotes you're presenting in your signature. just something for you to consider. imagine Christ were to return to find out his followers had been blindly following mistranslated / repurposed religious texts - and that very few of his followers were diligent enough to check their texts against the original Text. just some food for thought for someone that tries to say Mormons and Catholics aren't Christians based on a 'New World' translation of the Bible.

Considering that the Bible we have now has never been shown unreliable even once, I do not consider anything such as that a problem. God has miraclously preserved His Word, despite massive persecution.

again, i'm going to go ahead and say you're wrong on that one. i didn't master in religious studies, but i did enough courses to know that nearly every bible in use today is based on mistranslation and differs greatly in some cases when compared against the source material. you'll probably just say it's all lies - but it's not me that will judge. so your words are wasted. just do some research when you have the time, or don't - doesn't matter to me.
Avatar image for WSP87
WSP87

667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 WSP87
Member since 2006 • 667 Posts

[QUOTE="3picuri3"][QUOTE="Crushmaster"] Christians are people who have accepted Christ as their Savior and repented of their sins. Unless one is a Christian, you cannot follow Christ. Catholics base their salvation on works. Not on Christ. Thus, they are not Christians.Crushmaster
based on a definition that you won't find in most bibles. let me ask you one question. being a text-based literal Christian (one who relies solely on their interpretation of the bible, as test, taken literally) have you never asked yourself why your Christian elders haven't taken it upon themselves to re-examine the older texts to see if there are issues with translation? this is a very real issue that many sects disregard, only one has taken it upon themselves to make sure their text is sound. many versions of the bible suffered serious repurposing during the dark ages / middle ages, and again when America was colonized. you'd be shocked to see how different your version might be when put against the 'real' bible, based on word-for-word translation from the oldest documents available. you cannot question the veracity as they are the oldest documents available - and they differ greatly from the quotes you're presenting in your signature. just something for you to consider. imagine Christ were to return to find out his followers had been blindly following mistranslated / repurposed religious texts - and that very few of his followers were diligent enough to check their texts against the original Text. just some food for thought for someone that tries to say Mormons and Catholics aren't Christians based on a 'New World' translation of the Bible.

Considering that the Bible we have now has never been shown unreliable even once, I do not consider anything such as that a problem. God has miraclously preserved His Word, despite massive persecution.

Yeah? LOL! Stories of Zeus survive to this day. Those Greek mythologies are older than christianity and yet they stood the test of time. Must be Zeus's will then? Amirite?

Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Crushmaster"] Absolutely nothing? That is a ridiculous claim. Catholics believe the Sacraments - works - are salvific.
That is all I need to know (I do know more than that, but that is all that is needed at present).
And since you consider me incorrect on the meaning of a Christian, why don't you enlighten me?Crushmaster
Right. Thank your for proving my point. You don't know what Catholics believe. As for Christianity...the meaning is simple. ONE WHO FOLLOWS CHRIST.


Excepts it is impossible to follow Christ unless you have been born again.

according to your sect of Christianity. not based on literal retranslation of the scriptures.
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts

[QUOTE="Crushmaster"][QUOTE="3picuri3"] based on a definition that you won't find in most bibles. let me ask you one question. being a text-based literal Christian (one who relies solely on their interpretation of the bible, as test, taken literally) have you never asked yourself why your Christian elders haven't taken it upon themselves to re-examine the older texts to see if there are issues with translation? this is a very real issue that many sects disregard, only one has taken it upon themselves to make sure their text is sound. many versions of the bible suffered serious repurposing during the dark ages / middle ages, and again when America was colonized. you'd be shocked to see how different your version might be when put against the 'real' bible, based on word-for-word translation from the oldest documents available. you cannot question the veracity as they are the oldest documents available - and they differ greatly from the quotes you're presenting in your signature. just something for you to consider. imagine Christ were to return to find out his followers had been blindly following mistranslated / repurposed religious texts - and that very few of his followers were diligent enough to check their texts against the original Text. just some food for thought for someone that tries to say Mormons and Catholics aren't Christians based on a 'New World' translation of the Bible. WSP87

Considering that the Bible we have now has never been shown unreliable even once, I do not consider anything such as that a problem. God has miraclously preserved His Word, despite massive persecution.

Yeah? LOL! Stories of Zeus survive to this day. Those Greek mythologies are older than christianity and yet they stood the test of time. Must be Zeus's will then? Amirite?

he fails to see that he'd never know if it proved unreliable if he isn't 100% sure of the text translation to begin with. good old circular logic. seems to be a key tactic in these circles.. excuse the bad pun.

all I know is that if I was Jesus and people were going around telling other people they aren't Christians based on a text that doesn't follow a proper literal translation of the original document I'd be a bit confused and angry to say the least.

stories in his version of the bible should illustrate this if he took it in to consideration. either way, i'm outta here. these conversations cease to be interesting to me when the other side just runs you in circles.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180099 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Crushmaster"] Absolutely nothing? That is a ridiculous claim. Catholics believe the Sacraments - works - are salvific.
That is all I need to know (I do know more than that, but that is all that is needed at present).
And since you consider me incorrect on the meaning of a Christian, why don't you enlighten me?Crushmaster
Right. Thank your for proving my point. You don't know what Catholics believe. As for Christianity...the meaning is simple. ONE WHO FOLLOWS CHRIST.


Excepts it is impossible to follow Christ unless you have been born again.

And to that I say....you misunderstand the context of born again. Self righteousness has no place in Christianity dude.
Avatar image for WSP87
WSP87

667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 WSP87
Member since 2006 • 667 Posts
[QUOTE="WSP87"]

[QUOTE="Crushmaster"] Considering that the Bible we have now has never been shown unreliable even once, I do not consider anything such as that a problem. God has miraclously preserved His Word, despite massive persecution.3picuri3

Yeah? LOL! Stories of Zeus survive to this day. Those Greek mythologies are older than christianity and yet they stood the test of time. Must be Zeus's will then? Amirite?

he fails to see that he'd never know if it proved unreliable if he isn't 100% sure of the text translation to begin with. good old circular logic. seems to be a key tactic in these circles.. excuse the bad pun.

all I know is that if I was Jesus and people were going around telling other people they aren't Christians based on a text that doesn't follow a proper literal translation of the original document I'd be a bit confused and angry to say the least.

stories in his version of the bible should illustrate this if he took it in to consideration. either way, i'm outta here. these conversations cease to be interesting to me when the other side just runs you in circles.

LOL, you are absolutely right. They can only argue one point.

Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts
[QUOTE="Crushmaster"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Right. Thank your for proving my point. You don't know what Catholics believe. As for Christianity...the meaning is simple. ONE WHO FOLLOWS CHRIST. LJS9502_basic

Excepts it is impossible to follow Christ unless you have been born again.

And to that I say....you misunderstand the context of born again. Self righteousness has no place in Christianity dude.

exactly, and neither does indignation - but he's got both in spades. stories from his own text should provide him with ample illustration as to how un-Christian these things are.
Avatar image for supa_badman
supa_badman

16714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#70 supa_badman
Member since 2008 • 16714 Posts
[QUOTE="Crushmaster"] Absolutely nothing? That is a ridiculous claim. Catholics believe the Sacraments - works - are salvific.
That is all I need to know (I do know more than that, but that is all that is needed at present).
And since you consider me incorrect on the meaning of a Christian, why don't you enlighten me?LJS9502_basic
Right. Thank your for proving my point. You don't know what Catholics believe. As for Christianity...the meaning is simple. ONE WHO FOLLOWS CHRIST.

its essentially the same thing. as a matter of fact its catholics>>>>>>>>christians because they broke off from catholics. catholics believe in christianity but take it as catechism which means "universal" so they believe in the catechismic religion that is christianity. bah, christians definition is not as easy as there are TONS of other christians who do not believe in the exact same thing, and yes, have completely different opinions about Christ.
Avatar image for 123625
123625

9035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#71 123625
Member since 2006 • 9035 Posts

Crush*

Just because some one doesn't follow your own christianity doesn't mean they arn't christian. Catholics are christian no matter what you say, they follow christ and his miracles and are christians. Also elaborate on what you mean by born again, as in baptized? What excatly is born again to you?

Avatar image for WSP87
WSP87

667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 WSP87
Member since 2006 • 667 Posts

[QUOTE="Crushmaster"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Right. Thank your for proving my point. You don't know what Catholics believe. As for Christianity...the meaning is simple. ONE WHO FOLLOWS CHRIST. LJS9502_basic

Excepts it is impossible to follow Christ unless you have been born again.

And to that I say....you misunderstand the context of born again. Self righteousness has no place in Christianity dude.

He is blinded by his own faith (no offense, I'm not saying there is anything wrong with your faith). He is so wrapped up in the things he has been taught that he can't interperet for himself.

Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts

Crushmaster, this one is for you:

Romans 14:1-23"Receive one who is weak in the faith, but not to dispute over doubtful things. For one believes he may eat all things, but he who is weak eats only vegetables. Let not him who eats despise him who does not eat, and let not him who does not eat judge him who eats; for God has received him...One person esteems one day above another; another esteems every day alike. Let each be fully convinced in his own mind...But why do you judge your brother? Or why do you show contempt for your brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ...Therefore let us not judge one another anymore, but rather resolve this, not to put a stumbling block or a cause to fall in our brother's way."

maybe you'll see what i'm getting at if i use enough quotes from your book :). had Christians in general paid heed to this scripture then perhaps we wouldn't be living in a world full of different bibles with different translations with different figurative and symbolic meanings. Christianity was never meant to be about judging eachother, or trying to be better than one another - and this is the exact idea / driving force that has lead to the splintering of Christianity in to the various sects we see today. many of which being so far apart they cannot look eachother in the eye.

sad times we live in, when a Christian tells Mormons and Catholics that they aren't Christian based on their interpretation (nay, some mans interpretation that preceded you - even worse).

sad times.

Avatar image for Thinker_reborn
Thinker_reborn

676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Thinker_reborn
Member since 2008 • 676 Posts

[QUOTE="Crushmaster"] Absolutely nothing? That is a ridiculous claim. Catholics believe the Sacraments - works - are salvific.
That is all I need to know (I do know more than that, but that is all that is needed at present).
And since you consider me incorrect on the meaning of a Christian, why don't you enlighten me?LJS9502_basic
Right. Thank your for proving my point. You don't know what Catholics believe. As for Christianity...the meaning is simple. ONE WHO FOLLOWS CHRIST.

Regardless of what they actually believe about him?:?

Avatar image for blackregiment
blackregiment

11937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 blackregiment
Member since 2007 • 11937 Posts

[QUOTE="blackregiment"] Greenleaf concluded that according to the jurisdiction of legal evidence the resurrection of Jesus Christ was the best supported event in all of history! p2rus
Thats pretty weak if you ask me. September 11th is far more supported than the resurrection of Christ. I'm not saying whether or not this is true... but in the modern era, wars and such are much better supported than ANY event that occurred 2000 years ago.

I believe he was referring to antiquity, not modern history.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180099 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Crushmaster"] Absolutely nothing? That is a ridiculous claim. Catholics believe the Sacraments - works - are salvific.
That is all I need to know (I do know more than that, but that is all that is needed at present).
And since you consider me incorrect on the meaning of a Christian, why don't you enlighten me?Thinker_reborn

Right. Thank your for proving my point. You don't know what Catholics believe. As for Christianity...the meaning is simple. ONE WHO FOLLOWS CHRIST.

Regardless of what they actually believe about him?:?

You do know what follower of Christ means...right? No?
Avatar image for blackregiment
blackregiment

11937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 blackregiment
Member since 2007 • 11937 Posts
[QUOTE="blackregiment"][QUOTE="Boba_Fett_3710"] Well it's satire to me, as it's not my religion. Besides, if TC wants to believe that Dracula is his lord and savior, who are you, among all people, to deny him those beliefs?WSP87

First of all, he is not claiming it is satire. You can claim all you want but you don't make claims for him. His word do.

Second, read my initial post. I stated that he can believe in Dracula all he wants but for him to claim that Jesus was Dracula is an insult to Christians and I am challenging him on that.

No one is telling him that he can't believe whatever he wants so don't say that I am.

I'm not insulted. I think you are just getting worked up over nothing. This is the exact reason religion is a bad thing. The moment someone states their views and someone has a different view holy war ensues. LIGHTEN UP! Even if it isn't satire don't read this. Go read the Bible or something. Why subject yourself to all this stress?

I got a hilarious image in my head, and you are my inspiration. Picture a cartoon of Vampire Jesus couering back from a priest holding a cross. LMFAO!!! I need to draw this! (Or family Guy needs to do this). GO VAMPIRE JESUS!

Re-read my original post. I asked the TC for evidence to support his unhistorical and unbiblical claims. Now you lighten up.

Avatar image for blackregiment
blackregiment

11937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 blackregiment
Member since 2007 • 11937 Posts
[QUOTE="blackregiment"]

I am sorry but I find this thread and your unsupported claims regarding Jesus Christ, offensive to Christians. You compare followers of Christ to sheep and a food supply. This is offensive to followers of Christ.

You are free to believe whatever you want about vampires but I do not find it acceptable to blaspheme our Lord and Savior with unsupported opinions and claims calling Christ a vampire and Christians sheep, a food supply.

Care to supply some real hard evidence, other than novels and opinions from web sites to support your historically incorrect assertion. For example manuscript evidence, eyewitness testimony from ancient writers, or the proof of the "occult teachings of Christianity prior to Constantine". How about some proof for the claim that you made that that "Jesus was Dracula." Show us some ancient writers that existed at the time of Jesus and recoded their eyewitness testimony.

You wrote, "I'm just curious, how will this knowledge, the scientific fact that Jesus was Dracula" and "Dracula did not claim to be a God", well Jesus did claim to be God so you just refuted your own claim.

You identify yourself as Christian. Well Christians put their faith in Jesus Christ and live their lives base on God's Word revealed in the Bible. Perhaps you can point me to Scripture that reveals that Christ is Dracula. The Bible teaches that we cannot serve two masters so how do you reconcile your belief in Jesus as Dracula, a Jesus that is not the Biblical Jesus with the Jesus revealed in the Bible?

3picuri3

to many the bible is just a book too. guess it boils down to which book you want to put your faith in. it's also pretty well known, based on my religious studies classes, that our current version of the bible has been translated and retranslated over time. to my knowledge there is only one bible that is based on a re-translation of the oldest scriptures - and it's not the one you're citing in your signature.

You want to discuss Bibles, manuscript evidence, and translation committees. I like that topic. I have studied it for years.

Avatar image for Severed_Hand
Severed_Hand

3402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 Severed_Hand
Member since 2007 • 3402 Posts
Dracula was based on Vlad the Impaler.
Avatar image for Mister_Mushroom
Mister_Mushroom

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Mister_Mushroom
Member since 2008 • 38 Posts
If jesus was a vampire then why arn't all christens turned into vampires?wind-OF-s0rrOw
It is a common misconception by secular audiences that one becomes a vampire by being bitten. In reality, to become a vampire you must drink the blood of a vampire, and then be given the gift of eternal life by their bite. However, not all are worthy of becoming vampires, in reality, very few are. The notion that only 144,000 people will be "saved", as per the Christian Book of Revelation is not entirely inaccurate, the number of chosen vampires is quite small. - In the rare event that a human were made into a vampire WITHOUT consuming the blood of the Master Vampire, they would be driven insane, becoming a flesh-consuming monster not unlike what you think of as a "zombie". Of course, this would require some exceedingly rare combination of events. So no, the followers of Dracula / Camilla do not become vampires necessarily.
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts
[QUOTE="3picuri3"][QUOTE="blackregiment"]

I am sorry but I find this thread and your unsupported claims regarding Jesus Christ, offensive to Christians. You compare followers of Christ to sheep and a food supply. This is offensive to followers of Christ.

You are free to believe whatever you want about vampires but I do not find it acceptable to blaspheme our Lord and Savior with unsupported opinions and claims calling Christ a vampire and Christians sheep, a food supply.

Care to supply some real hard evidence, other than novels and opinions from web sites to support your historically incorrect assertion. For example manuscript evidence, eyewitness testimony from ancient writers, or the proof of the "occult teachings of Christianity prior to Constantine". How about some proof for the claim that you made that that "Jesus was Dracula." Show us some ancient writers that existed at the time of Jesus and recoded their eyewitness testimony.

You wrote, "I'm just curious, how will this knowledge, the scientific fact that Jesus was Dracula" and "Dracula did not claim to be a God", well Jesus did claim to be God so you just refuted your own claim.

You identify yourself as Christian. Well Christians put their faith in Jesus Christ and live their lives base on God's Word revealed in the Bible. Perhaps you can point me to Scripture that reveals that Christ is Dracula. The Bible teaches that we cannot serve two masters so how do you reconcile your belief in Jesus as Dracula, a Jesus that is not the Biblical Jesus with the Jesus revealed in the Bible?

blackregiment

to many the bible is just a book too. guess it boils down to which book you want to put your faith in. it's also pretty well known, based on my religious studies classes, that our current version of the bible has been translated and retranslated over time. to my knowledge there is only one bible that is based on a re-translation of the oldest scriptures - and it's not the one you're citing in your signature.

You want to discuss Bibles, manuscript evidence, and translation committees. I like that topic. I have studied it for years.

not really, had enough of it at school tbh. thanks though. i do have friends that are currently working on committees in Texas, post-grad Religious Studies department. i get my fill of discussing it with them. needless to say, i have many issues with many current translations in light of what I have learned through my own studies, and through hearing of others.

i also don't generally open myself to two-sided discourse with random people on the internet that are out and about solely to alter peoples worldviews - while being intolerant of others. i have no respect for people like that.

Avatar image for Mister_Mushroom
Mister_Mushroom

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Mister_Mushroom
Member since 2008 • 38 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Crushmaster"] Absolutely nothing? That is a ridiculous claim. Catholics believe the Sacraments - works - are salvific.
That is all I need to know (I do know more than that, but that is all that is needed at present).
And since you consider me incorrect on the meaning of a Christian, why don't you enlighten me?Thinker_reborn

Right. Thank your for proving my point. You don't know what Catholics believe. As for Christianity...the meaning is simple. ONE WHO FOLLOWS CHRIST.

Regardless of what they actually believe about him?:?

Technically I am a Christian, I believe The Christ is Savior. It's just, the Christ is actually a vampire, and the Gift of Eternal Life comes from consuming his true blood. Note, at the last supper, Dracula gave them WINE, not his true blood, AND without receiving his bite, drinking his blood would just cause suffering. - However communion is the ritual of receiving the Blood & Essense of the Vampire Master.

-

Not all Christians are comfortable with this claim, and that's fine. I understand the Christians who don't share my beliefs, and respect that they are entitled to believe Christ was not a vampire. That's fine :)

Avatar image for 8bitlove
8bitlove

571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 8bitlove
Member since 2007 • 571 Posts
[QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Right. Thank your for proving my point. You don't know what Catholics believe. As for Christianity...the meaning is simple. ONE WHO FOLLOWS CHRIST.Mister_Mushroom

Regardless of what they actually believe about him?:?

Technically I am a Christian, I believe The Christ is Savior. It's just, the Christ is actually a vampire, and the Gift of Eternal Life comes from consuming his true blood. Note, at the last supper, Dracula gave them WINE, not his true blood, AND without receiving his bite, drinking his blood would just cause suffering. - However communion is the ritual of receiving the Blood & Essense of the Vampire Master.

-

Not all Christians are comfortable with this claim, and that's fine. I understand the Christians who don't share my beliefs, and respect that they are entitled to believe Christ was not a vampire. That's fine :)

Even though vampires are creatures of the occult and are the product of of Satan?
Avatar image for Mister_Mushroom
Mister_Mushroom

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Mister_Mushroom
Member since 2008 • 38 Posts
[>Re-read my original post. I asked the TC for evidence to support his unhistorical and unbiblical claims. Now you lighten up.

blackregiment
Unfortunately most humans are not allowed to read from the Black Library. The text cannot even be reprinted from memory without bringing madness to those not granted permission to read it. Remember, the premise of the system was that Christians would be a reliable source of blood for the Vampire Lords, so for hundreds of years every effort was made to conceal the truth. - You're not going to have some huge body of evidence for something no one wants you to know about. The FACT that Jesus (Dracula ) ROSE FROM THE DEAD (and this is a FACT - you have studied, it is well documented ) is undeniable proof that he is a Revenant.
Avatar image for WSP87
WSP87

667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 WSP87
Member since 2006 • 667 Posts
[QUOTE="WSP87"][QUOTE="blackregiment"]

First of all, he is not claiming it is satire. You can claim all you want but you don't make claims for him. His word do.

Second, read my initial post. I stated that he can believe in Dracula all he wants but for him to claim that Jesus was Dracula is an insult to Christians and I am challenging him on that.

No one is telling him that he can't believe whatever he wants so don't say that I am.

blackregiment

I'm not insulted. I think you are just getting worked up over nothing. This is the exact reason religion is a bad thing. The moment someone states their views and someone has a different view holy war ensues. LIGHTEN UP! Even if it isn't satire don't read this. Go read the Bible or something. Why subject yourself to all this stress?

I got a hilarious image in my head, and you are my inspiration. Picture a cartoon of Vampire Jesus couering back from a priest holding a cross. LMFAO!!! I need to draw this! (Or family Guy needs to do this). GO VAMPIRE JESUS!

Re-read my original post. I asked the TC for evidence to support his unhistorical and unbiblical claims. Now you lighten up.

Re-read what i said. How is that not lighthearted? I'm very lighthearted. I don't take things seriously at all really, especially not "christians". I think Vampire Jesus is actually funny and a hialrious thought. You just reminded me of two kids arguing "Your ugly!" "Nuh-uh. YOU ARE!" lol people never cease to amuse me.

Avatar image for Mister_Mushroom
Mister_Mushroom

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Mister_Mushroom
Member since 2008 • 38 Posts
Even though vampires are creatures of the occult and are the product of of Satan?8bitlove
Vampires wrote the Bible, we wrote those parts about Satan. Satan is a vampire who betrayed Dracula, not ALL vampires sided with him, about a third did. And yes, they are "sealed from the world", vampire-hunting was a real profession, and it was quite a bad thing when the Vampire Lord Lucifer and his progeny walked the earth... but unfortunately he will return, he cannot be kept dead.
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts
[QUOTE="blackregiment"][>Re-read my original post. I asked the TC for evidence to support his unhistorical and unbiblical claims. Now you lighten up.

Mister_Mushroom

Unfortunately most humans are not allowed to read from the Black Library. The text cannot even be reprinted from memory without bringing madness to those not granted permission to read it. Remember, the premise of the system was that Christians would be a reliable source of blood for the Vampire Lords, so for hundreds of years every effort was made to conceal the truth. - You're not going to have some huge body of evidence for something no one wants you to know about. The FACT that Jesus (Dracula ) ROSE FROM THE DEAD (and this is a FACT - you have studied, it is well documented ) is undeniable proof that he is a Revenant.

you can't provide FACT (caps yours) from a fictional text that causes madness when you attempt to reproduce from memory. i'm all for rebutting people that are intolerant of your 'faith', but espousing it as fact when the book is supernatural and mythical to begin with is not something many will take seriously - no offense.

your ideas actually have more solid 'factual' roots in fiction - which again kind of undermines your attempt to be taken seriously. i mean the Black Library is trademarked by Games Workshop as part of the Warhammer Vampire Lore ffs.

Avatar image for Thinker_reborn
Thinker_reborn

676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Thinker_reborn
Member since 2008 • 676 Posts
[QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Right. Thank your for proving my point. You don't know what Catholics believe. As for Christianity...the meaning is simple. ONE WHO FOLLOWS CHRIST.LJS9502_basic

Regardless of what they actually believe about him?:?

You do know what follower of Christ means...right? No?

Ya if you believe him to be true and real.No?
Avatar image for 123625
123625

9035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#90 123625
Member since 2006 • 9035 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"]Regardless of what they actually believe about him?:? Thinker_reborn
You do know what follower of Christ means...right? No?

Ya if you believe him to be true and real.No?

I think he meant christan.
Avatar image for wind-OF-s0rrOw
wind-OF-s0rrOw

9166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#91 wind-OF-s0rrOw
Member since 2008 • 9166 Posts
[QUOTE="wind-OF-s0rrOw"]If jesus was a vampire then why arn't all christens turned into vampires?Mister_Mushroom
It is a common misconception by secular audiences that one becomes a vampire by being bitten. In reality, to become a vampire you must drink the blood of a vampire, and then be given the gift of eternal life by their bite. However, not all are worthy of becoming vampires, in reality, very few are. The notion that only 144,000 people will be "saved", as per the Christian Book of Revelation is not entirely inaccurate, the number of chosen vampires is quite small. - In the rare event that a human were made into a vampire WITHOUT consuming the blood of the Master Vampire, they would be driven insane, becoming a flesh-consuming monster not unlike what you think of as a "zombie". Of course, this would require some exceedingly rare combination of events. So no, the followers of Dracula / Camilla do not become vampires necessarily.

where did you get that. you know this sounds like some joke.
Avatar image for N8A
N8A

18602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 N8A
Member since 2007 • 18602 Posts
You fool, Jesus isn't a vampire; he's a ninja. Not a vampire, or a raptor (you heathens), but a ninja.Video_Game_King
I need pics of the ninja jesus!
Avatar image for Thinker_reborn
Thinker_reborn

676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Thinker_reborn
Member since 2008 • 676 Posts

[QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]You do know what follower of Christ means...right? No?123625
Ya if you believe him to be true and real.No?

I think he meant christan.

He said that if you follow christ then you are a christian,that's it.

Then I guess muslims are christians as well....:?

Avatar image for supa_badman
supa_badman

16714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#95 supa_badman
Member since 2008 • 16714 Posts

[QUOTE="123625"][QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"]Ya if you believe him to be true and real.No?Thinker_reborn

I think he meant christan.

He said that if you follow christ then you are a christian,that's it.

Then I guess muslims are christians as well....:?

too bad they pretty much denounce jesus in every way lol
Avatar image for tzar3
tzar3

12393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#96 tzar3
Member since 2006 • 12393 Posts
Holy crackheads! You serious!? :o
Avatar image for wind-OF-s0rrOw
wind-OF-s0rrOw

9166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#97 wind-OF-s0rrOw
Member since 2008 • 9166 Posts
[QUOTE="Video_Game_King"]You fool, Jesus isn't a vampire; he's a ninja. Not a vampire, or a raptor (you heathens), but a ninja.N8A
I need pics of the ninja jesus!

 yep. he's real :P
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts

[QUOTE="123625"][QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"]Ya if you believe him to be true and real.No?Thinker_reborn

I think he meant christan.

He said that if you follow christ then you are a christian,that's it.

Then I guess muslims are christians as well....:?

i don't know what you're getting at - but a Christian is traditionally a follower of Christ, as their predominant source of faith. Muslims, in that sense, are not Christian. if you're getting at Christians only being baptized / reborn / born again, then you are basing your beliefs on differing translations / interpretations of the religious text. imho, anyone that follows the teachings of Christ - above other prophets, is a Christian. anyone that says otherwise is acting counter to Jesus' teachings. it is not for the Christian to label his brother, or judge him. that is Christ' job. they will all be judged for what they do - according the bible.

that said, i haven't settled on my own faith - just basing this on my studies.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180099 Posts

[QUOTE="123625"][QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"]Ya if you believe him to be true and real.No?Thinker_reborn

I think he meant christan.

He said that if you follow christ then you are a christian,that's it.

Then I guess muslims are christians as well....:?

Muslims do not follow Christ. They follow Mohammed.:|
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts
[QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"]

[QUOTE="123625"] I think he meant christan.LJS9502_basic

He said that if you follow christ then you are a christian,that's it.

Then I guess muslims are christians as well....:?

Muslims do not follow Christ. They follow Mohammed.:|

they do still consider Jesus to be a prophet. but they do not, by design, follow the teaching of Christ.