[QUOTE="toast_burner"][QUOTE="kingkong0124"]
I think he's against it in the moral sense. While I do believe that is is morally wrong, I do believe in the freedom that my country allows and I have no problem with it being practiced, as long as all the participants are willing.
kingkong0124
Hows it morally wrong? It's a shame so many people seem to oppose love. Because I believe in the Bible and that is what I largely base my morals on. Consequently, in my moral compass, it is wrong. May not be the same for your own moral compass, but mine, yes, it's something wrong. There was a time when most nations and communities were ethnically, culturally, and religiously homogenous. This allowed them to rely upon common religious principles and traditions when crafting public laws and public moral requirements. Those who objected could be either suppressed or ejected with little problem. This is the historical background and context of the religious moral values which people still try to use as a basis for public laws today; unfortunately for them, nations and communities are changing dramatically.
More and more, human communities are becoming ethnically, culturally, and religiously diverse. There is no longer a single set of religious principles and traditions which community leaders can unthinkingly rely upon for crafting public laws or standards.
In place of traditional moral values, we should instead rely upon godless, secular values which are themselves derived from human reason, human empathy, and human experience. Human communities exist for the benefit of human beings and the same is true for human values and human morality. We need secular values as a basis for public laws because only godless, secular values are independent of the many religious traditions in a community.
This doesn't mean that religious believers who act on the basis of private religious values have nothing to offer public discussions, but it does mean that they cannot insist that public morality be defined according to those private religious values. Whatever they believe personally, they must also articulate those moral principles in terms of public reason - to explain why those values are justified on the basis of human reason, experience, and empathy rather than acceptance of the divine origins of some set of revelations or scriptures.
I'm not attacking you, just trying to get across that not everyone is a Christian and not everyone has the same moral values. Im glad you said you have no problem with allowing gay marriage, (at least I think you said that), because it would be silly to think that a ban on gay marriage isn't a infringement on everyone else's moral values that don't align with your religious values.
Log in to comment