"France moves closer to banning full Muslim veil"

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]How am I being naive? It is designed to restrict your movements - it is designed to eliminate your peripheral vision. These things aren't just coincidences. Hewkii
you're being naive for thinking m/any of the problems oppressed Muslim women face (ie, abuse) would be solved by banning clothing. also because it was designed for 'modesty', whatever that means. also because it was designed several centuries ago, and I think you'll find many clothes of the time are rather restrictive.

Well, I never said that this policy would act as a silver bullet that would solve most or all of the problems oppressed Muslim women face, but it would solve this particular problem regarding the burqa. And it is designed for modesty, but not just for modesty. Men are required in Islam to dress modestly as well, but you don't see men walking around in burqas, or anything comparable to a burqa.
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
So just because they believe that their god commands them to wear this thing (even though there is no commandment in the Koran that requires women to wear the burqa), that means that it is therefore somehow justified?-Sun_Tzu-
well, yes, that's sort of the whole reason why things like the First Amendment were thought up, so you could wear odd clothes or waste half your Sunday and no one could bug you about it. and again, this applies to women who voluntarily wear it. abused women would be abused no matter the cultural setting.
God commands a lot of things in both the Bible and the Koran that are illegal. Are those laws oppressive?-Sun_Tzu-
technically yes, but culturally our law system is based on similar laws as the Bible and Quran (ie no killing, stealing, adultery, etc), so there isn't a terrible amount of discrepancy. of course, there is the odd law that shows up in ancient books, but cultures tend to ignore those as time goes on.
Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
With the exception of -Sun_Tzu-'s comments (aside from that whole drawing comparisons to armed robbery thing), I find some of the comments in here absolutely vile. Defense of ethnocentrism. Viewing a culture of people as though they were some kind of brood parasite. Hypocrisy in pretending to be a free country.
Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#154 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts

[QUOTE="67gt500"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] Neither do I, but that is your rationale. To "preserve French culture" - in other words, to ban that which is not French.

PannicAtack

I said that the only culture the French government should be concerned about is French culture... how could anyone in their right mind deny a Nation its sovereign right to preserve its own traditions and culture? Perpetuating and preserving a country's values and traditions is one of its fundamental rights as a soverign nation. How they go about doing that could be debatable, but their right to do it is not...

This is the mindset behind things like the KKK and the BNP.

Are you trying to imply that I'm some kind of racist? It might surprise you to learn that there are things in this life that are worth preserving, and your nation's traditions, and values are among those things... but don't take my word for it - contact your own government and ask them if they feel that preserving your country's cultural identity is important to them...

Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
Well, I never said that this policy would act as a silver bullet that would solve most or all of the problems oppressed Muslim women face, but it would solve this particular problem regarding the burqa. And it is designed for modesty, but not just for modesty. Men are required in Islam to dress modestly as well, but you don't see men walking around in burqas, or anything comparable to a burqa. -Sun_Tzu-
there is no problem inherent to the burqa, at least not one that banning it would solve. and you should take a look at desert natives, there's a reason why most of the body is covered.
Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="67gt500"] I said that the only culture the French government should be concerned about is French culture... how could anyone in their right mind deny a Nation its sovereign right to preserve its own traditions and culture? Perpetuating and preserving a country's values and traditions is one of its fundamental rights as a soverign nation. How they go about doing that could be debatable, but their right to do it is not...67gt500

This is the mindset behind things like the KKK and the BNP.

Are you trying to imply that I'm some kind of racist? It might surprise you to learn that there are things in this life that are worth preserving, and your nation's traditions, and values are among those things... but don't take my word for it - contact your own government and ask them if they feel that preserving your country's cultural identity is important to them...

No. I'm saying that your attitude is blatantly ethnocentric and has been used as a defense by the likes of the Ku Klux Klan and the British National Party. It also doesn't help that you quote Goering in your sig.
Avatar image for grenadexjumpr
grenadexjumpr

1120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 grenadexjumpr
Member since 2005 • 1120 Posts

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="67gt500"] I said that the only culture the French government should be concerned about is French culture... how could anyone in their right mind deny a Nation its sovereign right to preserve its own traditions and culture? Perpetuating and preserving a country's values and traditions is one of its fundamental rights as a soverign nation. How they go about doing that could be debatable, but their right to do it is not...67gt500

This is the mindset behind things like the KKK and the BNP.

Are you trying to imply that I'm some kind of racist? It might surprise you to learn that there are things in this life that are worth preserving, and your nation's traditions, and values are among those things... but don't take my word for it - contact your own government and ask them if they feel that preserving your country's cultural identity is important to them...

Preserving your country's identity is important, but not at the expense of taking away from other cultures.

Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#158 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]Well, I never said that this policy would act as a silver bullet that would solve most or all of the problems oppressed Muslim women face, but it would solve this particular problem regarding the burqa. And it is designed for modesty, but not just for modesty. Men are required in Islam to dress modestly as well, but you don't see men walking around in burqas, or anything comparable to a burqa. Hewkii
there is no problem inherent to the burqa, at least not one that banning it would solve. and you should take a look at desert natives, there's a reason why most of the body is covered.

pretty sure there's no desert in France... but I haven't been there so I could be mistaken...
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
pretty sure there's no desert in France... but I haven't been there so I could be mistaken...67gt500
I'm pretty sure Jesus never went to America.
Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#160 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts
[QUOTE="67gt500"]pretty sure there's no desert in France... but I haven't been there so I could be mistaken...Hewkii
I'm pretty sure Jesus never went to America.

I'm pretty sure you're right...
Avatar image for tycoonmike
tycoonmike

6082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#161 tycoonmike
Member since 2005 • 6082 Posts

[QUOTE="tycoonmike"]

[QUOTE="Hewkii"] I'd say forcing people to disregard what they believe to be a command from the Almighty is just a tad oppressive, especially if your country has a habit of ignoring other cultures.PannicAtack

By that logic, though, the French government should ignore them if they start killing people of different faiths and they justify it as a command from the Almighty to make war against the infidel.

Clothing and murder aren't exactly comparable.


well, obviously. I mean, wearing a certain clothing and killing people are ideologically identical, after all.

Hewkii

The justification is the same, however. You will find it in bold above. It is believed by Muslims that wearing a Burqa is a command from Allah. It is written in the Qur'an for Muslims to make war against the infidel. The Qur'an is believed to be the commands of Allah to the Muslim people specifically and the followers of the other two major Abrahamic religions, Christianity and Judaism. Are we really going to cherry-pick what the Qur'an has to say about things such as this?

Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
I'm pretty sure you're right...67gt500
so why is everyone Christian? they must be cultural imperialists or something.
Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
[QUOTE="67gt500"]I'm pretty sure you're right...Hewkii
so why is everyone Christian? they must be cultural imperialists or something.

By the way, am I betraying American culture if I listen to European composers instead of American rock bands?
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
It is written in the Qur'an for Muslims to make war against the infidel. tycoonmike
*if they don't try to negotiate and/or attack you first.
Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#165 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts
[QUOTE="67gt500"]I'm pretty sure you're right...Hewkii
so why is everyone Christian? they must be cultural imperialists or something.

'everyone' isn't...
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
'everyone' isn't... 67gt500
nice dodge. gonna attack my grammar next?
Avatar image for tycoonmike
tycoonmike

6082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#167 tycoonmike
Member since 2005 • 6082 Posts

[QUOTE="tycoonmike"] It is written in the Qur'an for Muslims to make war against the infidel. Hewkii
*if they don't try to negotiate and/or attack you first.

That certainly hasn't stopped Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and all the other Muslim perverters out there.

Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#168 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts
[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="67gt500"]I'm pretty sure you're right...PannicAtack
so why is everyone Christian? they must be cultural imperialists or something.

By the way, am I betraying American culture if I listen to European composers instead of American rock bands?

Absolutely, but America was founded by Europeans and European traditions so maybe you've found yourself a loop-hole there...
Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
[QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="Hewkii"] so why is everyone Christian? they must be cultural imperialists or something.67gt500
By the way, am I betraying American culture if I listen to European composers instead of American rock bands?

Absolutely, but America was founded by Europeans and European traditions so maybe you've found yourself a loop-hole there...

Are you American?
Avatar image for Phaze-Two
Phaze-Two

3444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 Phaze-Two
Member since 2009 • 3444 Posts

Good. Women shouldn't be forced to cover their faces.Head_of_games

i think the issue here is women being forced to not cover their faces...

Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#171 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts

That certainly hasn't stopped Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and all the other Muslim perverters out there.

tycoonmike
well it's good to know that we can ban non-violent signs of religious worship because some nuts in a (cave, megachurch) pervert some script several millennia old.
Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#172 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts
[QUOTE="67gt500"]'everyone' isn't... Hewkii
nice dodge. gonna attack my grammar next?

Not dodging anything, I was just sayin' not 'everyone' is Christian... only about 15% of the world's population presently holds those beliefs... why, is there a problem with your grammar? I could help you with that - my grades in English Lit. through high-school and university were off the charts...
Avatar image for tycoonmike
tycoonmike

6082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#173 tycoonmike
Member since 2005 • 6082 Posts

[QUOTE="tycoonmike"]

That certainly hasn't stopped Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and all the other Muslim perverters out there.

Hewkii

well it's good to know that we can ban non-violent signs of religious worship because some nuts in a (cave, megachurch) pervert some script several millennia old.

Who said I was for the ban? Maybe you should read my posts from before our conversation? I just don't see the validity in the justification of "well it's in the Qur'an, so..."

Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
Not dodging anything, I was just sayin' not 'everyone' is Christian... only about 15% of the world's population presently holds those beliefs.67gt500
yessir, America is literally the entire world.
Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#175 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts
[QUOTE="67gt500"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"] By the way, am I betraying American culture if I listen to European composers instead of American rock bands?PannicAtack
Absolutely, but America was founded by Europeans and European traditions so maybe you've found yourself a loop-hole there...

Are you American?

I'm Canadian... same (fundamental) values, different flag... So, North American if you will...
Avatar image for priestinacloset
priestinacloset

1508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 priestinacloset
Member since 2005 • 1508 Posts
Hope others follow
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts

Who said I was for the ban? Maybe you should read my posts from before our conversation? I just don't see the validity in the justification of "well it's in the Qur'an, so..."

tycoonmike
it's more "it's someone's religious belief, harms literally nobody, and for many is entirely voluntary".
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

well, yes, that's sort of the whole reason why things like the First Amendment were thought up, so you could wear odd clothes or waste half your Sunday and no one could bug you about it. and again, this applies to women who voluntarily wear it. abused women would be abused no matter the cultural setting. Hewkii

I don't accept this sort of nihilism regarding the oppression of women. I've said it a number of times and I'll say it again, just because this policy does not address all the problems regarding abuse and oppression that are facing women, that does not justify allowing this particular type of oppression to go on.

technically yes, but culturally our law system is based on similar laws as the Bible and Quran (ie no killing, stealing, adultery, etc), so there isn't a terrible amount of discrepancy. of course, there is the odd law that shows up in ancient books, but cultures tend to ignore those as time goes on.Hewkii

Actually I'd say that there is a lot of discrepancy, but that's its own topic. And what happens when cultures do not ignore "odd laws"? Just look at the gay marriage debate in the U.S. Being against gay marriage is a position held by many in the mainstream Christian community. A lot of these people feel that we cannot allow gays to get married because that would go against the word of God. And then there's the intelligent design movement, where you have these parents preventing their children from learning science because their holy book says that God created the earth in six days. Also, as I've already said, there is not a single passage in the Koran that requires women to wear the burqa.

And when communities abandon their archaic laws and dogma, they often do not do this unanimously. That's why fundamentalists exist.

Avatar image for tycoonmike
tycoonmike

6082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#179 tycoonmike
Member since 2005 • 6082 Posts

[QUOTE="tycoonmike"]

Who said I was for the ban? Maybe you should read my posts from before our conversation? I just don't see the validity in the justification of "well it's in the Qur'an, so..."

Hewkii

it's more "it's someone's religious belief, harms literally nobody, and for many is entirely voluntary".

Then you should have said that instead of "they believe it to be a command from God."

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#180 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
Good to hear. It's for their own good too. I know I'd certainly be more receptive to talking to someone's face. It's not like we talk to people through the letter box instead of answering the door. That's just plain rude.
Avatar image for cowplayinghalo
cowplayinghalo

1642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 cowplayinghalo
Member since 2005 • 1642 Posts
[QUOTE="_7h0m_"]nice! a history n00b. you might consider the fact that the usa lost a dump load of wars in the recent years... as a whole france has a far superior success rate than the us at winning conflicts.... but i guess you'll quote me and add that idiotic google glitch remark.Omni-Slash
History Noob.....:lol:....:lol:....

I also :lol: To 7h0m: One country out of 'Nam, another one in. Then out. Wouldn't exactly call either country "successful", but hey, say what you want
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]Well, I never said that this policy would act as a silver bullet that would solve most or all of the problems oppressed Muslim women face, but it would solve this particular problem regarding the burqa. And it is designed for modesty, but not just for modesty. Men are required in Islam to dress modestly as well, but you don't see men walking around in burqas, or anything comparable to a burqa. Hewkii
there is no problem inherent to the burqa, at least not one that banning it would solve. and you should take a look at desert natives, there's a reason why most of the body is covered.

But there is no reason why the burqa eliminates one's peripheral vision and deprives one of their identity. There is no male equivalent to that. It is exclusively worn by women, and that's no accident.
Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#183 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts

Being against gay marriage is a position held by many in the mainstream Christian community. A lot of these people feel that we cannot allow gays to get married because that would go against the word of God.

-Sun_Tzu-

You've singled-out Christians in this statement but ironically, most of the people I associate with are Muslims, and they are much more opposed and much more out-spoken against gay marriage (and homosexuality in general) than any of the Christians I know... in fact, in some Muslim nations practicing homosexuality is a crime punishable by death...

Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#184 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts

I don't accept this sort of nihilism regarding the oppression of women. I've said it a number of times and I'll say it again, just because this policy does not address all the problems regarding abuse and oppression that are facing women, that does not justify allowing this particular type of oppression to go on.

-Sun_Tzu-
except again, it's not oppressive, because it's entirely voluntary for a large segment of those involved.

And what happens when cultures do not ignore "odd laws"? Just look at the gay marriage, ID] debate. Also, as I've already said, there is not a single passage in the Koran that requires women to wear the burqa.

And when communities abandon their archaic laws and dogma, they often do not do this unanimously. That's why fundamentalists exist.

the views of those against gay marriage and intelligent design are reprehensible, yes, but are not worth banning things over. in fact, Gay Marriage is actually a perfect parallel, as like the burqa, those involved are (usually) consensual in the act and allowing it does not harm those opposed to it at all. and while you're right that the burqa specifically is (probably, I haven't read the Qu'ran) not required, it's more of a cultural relic that serves the purpose of 'modesty' in Islam (check out the Berber I posted a couple pages pack for a guy who is dressed head to toe too).
Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#185 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
[QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="67gt500"] Absolutely, but America was founded by Europeans and European traditions so maybe you've found yourself a loop-hole there...67gt500
Are you American?

I'm Canadian... same (fundamental) values, different flag... So, North American if you will...

Okay. Tell me honestly if you recognize these names DW Griffith Mack Sennett Frank Capra Samuel Barber Gian-Carlo Menotti Aaron Copland Richard Rogers Oscar Hammerstein II Jerome Kern Stephen Sondheim Leonard Bernstein
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#186 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] But there is no reason why the burqa eliminates one's peripheral vision and deprives one of their identity. There is no male equivalent to that. It is exclusively worn by women, and that's no accident.

it keeps sand out. that's literally it.
Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#187 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
Good to hear. It's for their own good too. I know I'd certainly be more receptive to talking to someone's face. It's not like we talk to people through the letter box instead of answering the door. That's just plain rude.SolidSnake35
Said the person posting on an internet forum.
Avatar image for cowplayinghalo
cowplayinghalo

1642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 cowplayinghalo
Member since 2005 • 1642 Posts
[QUOTE="67gt500"]

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"] This is the mindset behind things like the KKK and the BNP.PannicAtack

Are you trying to imply that I'm some kind of racist? It might surprise you to learn that there are things in this life that are worth preserving, and your nation's traditions, and values are among those things... but don't take my word for it - contact your own government and ask them if they feel that preserving your country's cultural identity is important to them...

No. I'm saying that your attitude is blatantly ethnocentric and has been used as a defense by the likes of the Ku Klux Klan and the British National Party. It also doesn't help that you quote Goering in your sig.

So what if he quotes Goering? The criminally insane and Nobel Peace prize winners sometimes say the same things. It doesn't mean 67gt500 is a Nazi.
Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#189 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts

[QUOTE="67gt500"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"] Are you American?PannicAtack
I'm Canadian... same (fundamental) values, different flag... So, North American if you will...

Okay. Tell me honestly if you recognize these names DW Griffith Mack Sennett Frank Capra Samuel Barber Gian-Carlo Menotti Aaron Copland Richard Rogers Oscar Hammerstein II Jerome Kern Stephen Sondheim Leonard Bernstein

I know the top three are film-makers, and some are composers... I'm not familiar with Gian-Carlo Menotti, or Kern...

Avatar image for bobaban
bobaban

10560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#190 bobaban
Member since 2005 • 10560 Posts
Fantastic. Hopefully North America will follow suit,
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#191 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]Good to hear. It's for their own good too. I know I'd certainly be more receptive to talking to someone's face. It's not like we talk to people through the letter box instead of answering the door. That's just plain rude.PannicAtack
Said the person posting on an internet forum.

I've posted a photo of myself many times. Regardless, unless you're also going to include writing a letter and so on in your argument, you'd be forced to concede that it's totally not rude for me to talk to you in person with my back to you or with my face in my hands.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

except again, it's not oppressive, because it's entirely voluntary for a large segment of those involved.Hewkii

But it is also entirely involuntary for a large segment of those involved - there are a lot of women who are wearing it against their will. I am holding the position that even if a ban was oppressive - forcing women to not wear it is a whole lot less oppressive than forcing women to wear it.

the views of those against gay marriage and intelligent design are reprehensible, yes, but are not worth banning things over. in fact, Gay Marriage is actually a perfect parallel, as like the burqa, those involved are (usually) consensual in the act and allowing it does not harm those opposed to it at all. and while you're right that the burqa specifically is (probably, I haven't read the Qu'ran) not required, it's more of a cultural relic that serves the purpose of 'modesty' in Islam (check out the Berber I posted a couple pages pack for a guy who is dressed head to toe too).Hewkii

But allowing it does harm those that are opposed to it and yet they are being forced to wear it.

And the picture of the Berber you posted doesn't have his entire face covered, you can still see his entire face, and he doesn't have to see out of a tiny slit. There is no male garment that is equivalent to the burqa.

Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]Good to hear. It's for their own good too. I know I'd certainly be more receptive to talking to someone's face. It's not like we talk to people through the letter box instead of answering the door. That's just plain rude.SolidSnake35
Said the person posting on an internet forum.

I've posted a photo of myself many times. Regardless, unless you're also going to include writing a letter and so on in your argument, you'd be forced to concede that it's totally not rude for me to talk to you in person with my back to you or with my face in my hands.

Sorry. You win.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#194 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] But there is no reason why the burqa eliminates one's peripheral vision and deprives one of their identity. There is no male equivalent to that. It is exclusively worn by women, and that's no accident.Hewkii
it keeps sand out. that's literally it.

Then why is it that men do not wear anything that resembles a burqa? I seriously doubt that it's because men enjoy having sand in their face.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#195 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
Sorry. You win.PannicAtack
I always do.
Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#196 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
[QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="67gt500"] I'm Canadian... same (fundamental) values, different flag... So, North American if you will...67gt500
Okay. Tell me honestly if you recognize these names DW Griffith Mack Sennett Frank Capra Samuel Barber Gian-Carlo Menotti Aaron Copland Richard Rogers Oscar Hammerstein II Jerome Kern Stephen Sondheim Leonard Bernstein

I know the top three are film-makers, and some are composers... I'm not familiar with Carlo Menotti, Rogers or Kern...

Also composers. Hammerstein being a playwright and lyricist. This was intended to be something about you not knowing about American culture, but you can recognize DW Griffith and Samuel Barber, you've shown me up. I am getting far too smarmy.
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts

Then why is it that men do not wear anything that resembles a burqa? I seriously doubt that it's because men enjoy having sand in their face.

-Sun_Tzu-

they do.

Avatar image for tycoonmike
tycoonmike

6082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#198 tycoonmike
Member since 2005 • 6082 Posts

[QUOTE="Hewkii"]except again, it's not oppressive, because it's entirely voluntary for a large segment of those involved.-Sun_Tzu-

But it is also entirely involuntary for a large segment of those involved - there are a lot of women who are wearing it against their will. I am holding the position that even if a ban was oppressive - forcing women to not wear it is a whole lot less oppressive than forcing women to wear it.

So if, by the same logic, the French were to enact a law saying men couldn't have beards longer than five centimeters it wouldn't be oppresive but would rather be good for hygenic purposes?

And besides, where are your figures saying that a majority of Muslim women in France are forced to wear a Burqa?

Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#199 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts
[QUOTE="67gt500"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"] Okay. Tell me honestly if you recognize these names DW Griffith Mack Sennett Frank Capra Samuel Barber Gian-Carlo Menotti Aaron Copland Richard Rogers Oscar Hammerstein II Jerome Kern Stephen Sondheim Leonard BernsteinPannicAtack
I know the top three are film-makers, and some are composers... I'm not familiar with Carlo Menotti, Rogers or Kern...

Also composers. Hammerstein being a playwright and lyricist. This was intended to be something about you not knowing about American culture, but you can recognize DW Griffith and Samuel Barber, you've shown me up. I am getting far too smarmy.

lol - I forgive you... ironically, it's always been my experience that Canadians tend to know more about American culture than most Americans do, so your feelings of 'smarmy-ness' (?) are justifiable...
Avatar image for SkylinePigeon
SkylinePigeon

2625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#200 SkylinePigeon
Member since 2005 • 2625 Posts

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] That's obviously not the point I am trying to make. It's illegal to wear a ski mask in a bank because it makes it much easier to identify a bank robber. Apply that logic in this case - by making it illegal to wear the burqa, it becomes much easier to identify the women who are being oppressed. -Sun_Tzu-

All the while stomping on centuries of cultural values. Lovely.

Well, I'd argue that the culture of oppressing women by forcing them to wear this garment isn't very valuable at all.

Again, I don't think that this the perfect policy, but it is the best policy available, and I think that it would be better than the status quo.

Many women prefer to wear the burqa to ensure modesty. They believe their body is something so special that it should be protected and only revealed around the family. That is their right to choose that. I agree that there should be no laws forcing women to wear the burqa, because that is removing their right to choose. I just as fervently believe women should have the option if they so choose. This may seem like a simple issue, but if you let your freedoms get picked away one by one, someday you may have none left.