"France moves closer to banning full Muslim veil"

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#201 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]Then why is it that men do not wear anything that resembles a burqa? I seriously doubt that it's because men enjoy having sand in their face.

Hewkii

they do.

That's nowhere near as physically restrictive, nor is it as visually restrictive.

I mean, just take your pick. Which would you rather wear, regardless of gender?

This:

Or this:

Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#202 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts

I mean, just take your pick. Which would you rather wear, regardless of gender?

-Sun_Tzu-
the guy is unwrapping the linen from his face. they look about the same to me.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#203 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]All the while stomping on centuries of cultural values. Lovely.SkylinePigeon

Well, I'd argue that the culture of oppressing women by forcing them to wear this garment isn't very valuable at all.

Again, I don't think that this the perfect policy, but it is the best policy available, and I think that it would be better than the status quo.

Many women prefer to wear the burqa to ensure modesty. They believe their body is something so special that it should be protected and only revealed around the family. That is their right to choose that. I agree that there should be no laws forcing women to wear the burqa, because that is removing their right to choose. I just as fervently believe women should have the option if they so choose. This may seem like a simple issue, but if you let your freedoms get picked away one by one, someday you may have none left.

But what about those who are not being forced by the state to wear the burqa, but by their father, or their husband?
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#204 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
This may seem like a simple issue, but if you let your freedoms get picked away one by one, someday you may have none left.SkylinePigeon
They're free to wear them where it's socially acceptable. We make more than enough concessions for foreigners. The least they could do is take their hats off to us. I mean, scarf... veil. >_>
Avatar image for SkylinePigeon
SkylinePigeon

2625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#205 SkylinePigeon
Member since 2005 • 2625 Posts
[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]Yes that too, which exemplifies the imperfections regarding this policy, but it gives these women who are being forced to wear this symbol of female subservience a way out. While it bans women from wearing it voluntarily, at the same time it bans men from forcing women to wear it, and I think that justifies the policy.-Sun_Tzu-
you really think someone who can't just run to the police and say "my husband's abusing me" is going to be just fine after they can't wear some clothing anymore? I mean, damn, there are much more effective ways to oppress people.

Is this policy going to make abusive, oppressive relationships a thing of the past? No. But it puts a significant number of women in a better position than they would otherwise be in if this policy weren't to be in place.

I disagree with this statement. If a woman has a domineering, controlling husband, getting rid of the burqa will not make her situation better. It could, in fact, make it worse--he could force her to stay inside all the time so that her body remains hidden. There's no objective proof that banning the burqa will make women's lives better, and honestly I think it assumes way too much of the French in charge of this policy. It's being made as an anti-foreign gesture, French protectionism. The well being of the women is not in the minds of the policy makers, I don't think.
Avatar image for SquatsAreAwesom
SquatsAreAwesom

1678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#206 SquatsAreAwesom
Member since 2009 • 1678 Posts
They should ban women from wearing anything that hides their goods.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#207 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]

I mean, just take your pick. Which would you rather wear, regardless of gender?

Hewkii
the guy is unwrapping the linen from his face. they look about the same to me.

I'm sorry but I just don't see how you can reach that conclusion. Even with that linen rapped around his face, you would still be able to recognize him, more or less, and he still maintains his peripheral vision. The burqa makes the wearer faceless - it strips their identity away from them completely. Not only that but they might as well be looking out of the slit of a mailbox.
Avatar image for Good-Apollo
Good-Apollo

751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#208 Good-Apollo
Member since 2007 • 751 Posts
This is an excellent move. Misogyny is misogyny, even if it's under the guise of religion.
Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#209 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
This is an excellent move. Misogyny is misogyny, even if it's under the guise of religion.Good-Apollo
What about misogyny in the guise of feminism?
Avatar image for SquatsAreAwesom
SquatsAreAwesom

1678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#210 SquatsAreAwesom
Member since 2009 • 1678 Posts
This is an excellent move. Misogyny is misogyny, even if it's under the guise of religion.Good-Apollo
Women not being allowed to wear what they want is misogyny. You hear it here on OT.
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#211 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
Even with that linen rapped around his face, you would still be able to recognize him, more or less, and he still maintains his peripheral vision-Sun_Tzu-
no, he wouldn't. it's hard to see anything with cloth over your face.
Avatar image for Good-Apollo
Good-Apollo

751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#212 Good-Apollo
Member since 2007 • 751 Posts
[QUOTE="Good-Apollo"]This is an excellent move. Misogyny is misogyny, even if it's under the guise of religion.SquatsAreAwesom
Women not being allowed to wear what they want is misogyny. You hear it here on OT.

Not really, these women are under great pressure to cover themselves up.
Avatar image for SquatsAreAwesom
SquatsAreAwesom

1678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#213 SquatsAreAwesom
Member since 2009 • 1678 Posts
[QUOTE="SquatsAreAwesom"][QUOTE="Good-Apollo"]This is an excellent move. Misogyny is misogyny, even if it's under the guise of religion.Good-Apollo
Women not being allowed to wear what they want is misogyny. You hear it here on OT.

Not really, these women are under great pressure to cover themselves up.

O'rly? That's funny, because last I hear women in France were picketing against this. What's next? Ban bras because women are being pressured into using those as well. Get real.
Avatar image for Jaks_Secret
Jaks_Secret

9003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#214 Jaks_Secret
Member since 2006 • 9003 Posts
How intolerant of them.
Avatar image for SquatsAreAwesom
SquatsAreAwesom

1678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#215 SquatsAreAwesom
Member since 2009 • 1678 Posts

How intolerant of them. Jaks_Secret
Exactly. It is stories like this that draw the distinction between actual secularists and those who are simply bigots.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#216 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="SkylinePigeon"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] Well, I'd argue that the culture of oppressing women by forcing them to wear this garment isn't very valuable at all.

Again, I don't think that this the perfect policy, but it is the best policy available, and I think that it would be better than the status quo.

-Sun_Tzu-

Many women prefer to wear the burqa to ensure modesty. They believe their body is something so special that it should be protected and only revealed around the family. That is their right to choose that. I agree that there should be no laws forcing women to wear the burqa, because that is removing their right to choose. I just as fervently believe women should have the option if they so choose. This may seem like a simple issue, but if you let your freedoms get picked away one by one, someday you may have none left.

But what about those who are not being forced by the state to wear the burqa, but by their father, or their husband?

I really don't think this is the issue here. Personally I agree in principle, I think it's a sexist double-standard. The issue, though, is that it's not right to go to another culture and say, "you can't do this or that." Cultures evolve at their own pace, and often going in and saying that triditions like this are outright wrong creates more animosity and does littel good. America itself has gone through a pretty radical change in what is acceptable in women's clothing in the past century, if you went to someone during the 30's or 40's and told them that forcing women to conceal their bodies is wrong they wouldn't take too kindly to you. Bottom line, it's a choice for Muslims to make, if they feel comfortable wearing a burka then let them, if not then they live in a democratic country and they are free to not wear a burka, and if there is someone who's forcing it on them they can go to the authorities and do somethign about it.

Avatar image for Good-Apollo
Good-Apollo

751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#217 Good-Apollo
Member since 2007 • 751 Posts
[QUOTE="SquatsAreAwesom"][QUOTE="Good-Apollo"][QUOTE="SquatsAreAwesom"] Women not being allowed to wear what they want is misogyny. You hear it here on OT.

Not really, these women are under great pressure to cover themselves up.

O'rly? That's funny, because last I hear women in France were picketing against this. What's next? Ban bras because women are being pressured into using those as well. Get real.

You get real buddy, sexism in islam has been going on since its very start, it's ingrained, so of course many followers won't know any better. However it doesn't make it any less misogynistic
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#218 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
[QUOTE="Good-Apollo"] You get real buddy, sexism in [religion] has been going on since its very start, it's ingrained, so of course many followers won't know any better. However it doesn't make it any less misogynistic

Avatar image for SkylinePigeon
SkylinePigeon

2625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#219 SkylinePigeon
Member since 2005 • 2625 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] But what about those who are not being forced by the state to wear the burqa, but by their father, or their husband?

See my previous reply. If they are being forced by their husbands, the solution is not to take away the burqa, the solution is to do something about the husband. An analogous situation: many children in the US are beaten until bloody with leather belts. Do you make those illegal? You can't. Just because someone may do something immoral with an object doesn't mean that object should be banned. At least not in a democratic country.
Avatar image for Good-Apollo
Good-Apollo

751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#220 Good-Apollo
Member since 2007 • 751 Posts

You get real buddy, sexism in [religion] has been going on since its very start, it's ingrained, so of course many followers won't know any better. However it doesn't make it any less misogynistic Hewkii
I agree, however we're discussing islam here.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#221 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="SkylinePigeon"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="Hewkii"] you really think someone who can't just run to the police and say "my husband's abusing me" is going to be just fine after they can't wear some clothing anymore? I mean, damn, there are much more effective ways to oppress people.

Is this policy going to make abusive, oppressive relationships a thing of the past? No. But it puts a significant number of women in a better position than they would otherwise be in if this policy weren't to be in place.

I disagree with this statement. If a woman has a domineering, controlling husband, getting rid of the burqa will not make her situation better. It could, in fact, make it worse--he could force her to stay inside all the time so that her body remains hidden. There's no objective proof that banning the burqa will make women's lives better, and honestly I think it assumes way too much of the French in charge of this policy. It's being made as an anti-foreign gesture, French protectionism. The well being of the women is not in the minds of the policy makers, I don't think.

While some of those who support this policy may have ethnocentric motives, this policy is being pushed in France by many people who would otherwise support pluralism and multiculturalism. Now, I think that your concern is somewhat legitimate, but as you've said, there is really not that much empirical evidence that shows what effect a ban would have on a women's life, so I think we should at least try this course of action and see how it turns out.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#222 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="SkylinePigeon"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] But what about those who are not being forced by the state to wear the burqa, but by their father, or their husband?

See my previous reply. If they are being forced by their husbands, the solution is not to take away the burqa, the solution is to do something about the husband. An analogous situation: many children in the US are beaten until bloody with leather belts. Do you make those illegal? You can't. Just because someone may do something immoral with an object doesn't mean that object should be banned. At least not in a democratic country.

Belts serve a very practical purpose, and it is relatively easy to identify children who are beaten until bloody with leather belts. You cannot realistically identify which women are being forced to wear a burqa and which are not, and it also prevents us as a society from identifying women who are beaten until bloody with things like leather belts.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#223 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]Even with that linen rapped around his face, you would still be able to recognize him, more or less, and he still maintains his peripheral visionHewkii
no, he wouldn't. it's hard to see anything with cloth over your face.

The cloth does not cover his entire face. It leaves a lot of room for his eyes. Moreover, how many Islamic males wear that veil every time they go out in public on a regular day (assuming they don't live in the middle of an empty desert)? How many Islamic males wear that veil in France every time they go out in public, or other places in Europe?
Avatar image for SkylinePigeon
SkylinePigeon

2625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#224 SkylinePigeon
Member since 2005 • 2625 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] While some of those who support this policy may have ethnocentric motives, this policy is being pushed in France by many people who would otherwise support pluralism and multiculturalism. Now, I think that your concern is somewhat legitimate, but as you've said, there is really not that much empirical evidence that shows what effect a ban would have on a women's life, so I think we should at least try this course of action and see how it turns out.

Taking away freedoms "just to try it out" is a poor, poor thing to do. Any rights you feel like giving up, just so I can see how it works for everyone else? It's one thing to talk about it in the abstract, but different to put it personally. What if I'm offended by your username because I think Sun Tzu promotes warfare? How about we ban that and see how it goes because I'm uncomfortable with it, regardless of how it makes you feel. The ideas of Sun Tzu have been used to do some pretty awful, oppressing things to people in the history of mankind, so lets just get rid of him. Doesn't matter that you want him around, or that military strategists like him. His work has made life worse for some people. Ban it. This can't be measured. Those women who are being oppressed by the burqa have no voice, with or without the fabric. Their husbands and fathers would never consent to me coming in with my news crew and asking them how they feel about it. So you can take it away as a trial, but how do you know it's been successful? You can't... so regardless, you never get it back. It's gone for good. And then those women who are being forced to use it, well, the situation won't improve. People will find ways to circumvent the law, wearing things that are technically not burqa but are as close as can be, if they are not forced to stay inside like I posted above. The solution sounds nice in theory but in practice it will fix nothing. The people of France will just be stuck with one less freedom. If they want to choose it, they may. It's not my country and I cannot tell them what is right for them. But I would fight it if such a thing were to be proposed in the US.
Avatar image for SkylinePigeon
SkylinePigeon

2625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#225 SkylinePigeon
Member since 2005 • 2625 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="SkylinePigeon"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] But what about those who are not being forced by the state to wear the burqa, but by their father, or their husband?

See my previous reply. If they are being forced by their husbands, the solution is not to take away the burqa, the solution is to do something about the husband. An analogous situation: many children in the US are beaten until bloody with leather belts. Do you make those illegal? You can't. Just because someone may do something immoral with an object doesn't mean that object should be banned. At least not in a democratic country.

Belts serve a very practical purpose, and it is relatively easy to identify children who are beaten until bloody with leather belts. You cannot realistically identify which women are being forced to wear a burqa and which are not, and it also prevents us as a society from identifying women who are beaten until bloody with things like leather belts.

To some Muslim women, a burqa is practical. It protects what she sees as most sacred--her body. Parents can hide their children, make them wear long sleeves and pants, etc. Abuse is unfortunately easier to hide than it seems you think. It's not a perfect analogy, but regardless I think you understand the point I was trying to make.
Avatar image for DarkGamer007
DarkGamer007

6033

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#226 DarkGamer007
Member since 2008 • 6033 Posts

Wow, how if France getting away with this? Banning a religious piece of clothing is just wrong, especially for the reasons France is probably doing it for...

Avatar image for redstorm72
redstorm72

4646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#227 redstorm72
Member since 2008 • 4646 Posts

Good. It is clearly oppressive to women, no matter what many Muslims say. And yes, this ban is somewhat discriminatory, but so what? In Germany, they don't allow there citizens to wear or put up swastikas or other Nazi symbols or in the U.S., they would not let a person wear or put up clearly racist messages. The Burka, like these examples, is a representation of something that nation doesn't stand for (in this case, the oppression of women). To ensure the ideals of that nation are upheld, sometimes they have to limit certain freedoms.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#228 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] While some of those who support this policy may have ethnocentric motives, this policy is being pushed in France by many people who would otherwise support pluralism and multiculturalism. Now, I think that your concern is somewhat legitimate, but as you've said, there is really not that much empirical evidence that shows what effect a ban would have on a women's life, so I think we should at least try this course of action and see how it turns out.SkylinePigeon
Taking away freedoms "just to try it out" is a poor, poor thing to do. Any rights you feel like giving up, just so I can see how it works for everyone else? It's one thing to talk about it in the abstract, but different to put it personally. What if I'm offended by your username because I think Sun Tzu promotes warfare? How about we ban that and see how it goes because I'm uncomfortable with it, regardless of how it makes you feel. The ideas of Sun Tzu have been used to do some pretty awful, oppressing things to people in the history of mankind, so lets just get rid of him. Doesn't matter that you want him around, or that military strategists like him. His work has made life worse for some people. Ban it. This can't be measured. Those women who are being oppressed by the burqa have no voice, with or without the fabric. Their husbands and fathers would never consent to me coming in with my news crew and asking them how they feel about it. So you can take it away as a trial, but how do you know it's been successful? You can't... so regardless, you never get it back. It's gone for good. And then those women who are being forced to use it, well, the situation won't improve. People will find ways to circumvent the law, wearing things that are technically not burqa but are as close as can be, if they are not forced to stay inside like I posted above. The solution sounds nice in theory but in practice it will fix nothing. The people of France will just be stuck with one less freedom. If they want to choose it, they may. It's not my country and I cannot tell them what is right for them. But I would fight it if such a thing were to be proposed in the US.

There's always going to be trial and error involved when it comes to formulating policy. Now, as of now these women really can't go out in public in any meaningful sense. No one can make eye contact with them, no one can see their faces, and they also pose a security threat as well, because you can't identify them, so I think at the bare minimum, a limited ban on burqas in public places like banks, or train stations, or airports - places where your face needs to be visible for security reasons, is completely justified.

Getting back to a complete ban on burqas, as I've said, going out into public does not mean much to these women as of now. It doesn't really carry the same degree of liberty that it would otherwise carry, if it carries any at all. And so while I feel as if a large number of women being forced to stay inside might be a possible outcome of this policy (although I do not think that it's a probable outcome), I think the situation is dire enough that this should at least be tried. Unfortunately these women don't have much to lose; the burqa erases a woman's identity from society, and this policy could potentially give them their identity back. That's a huge upside.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#229 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="SkylinePigeon"] See my previous reply. If they are being forced by their husbands, the solution is not to take away the burqa, the solution is to do something about the husband. An analogous situation: many children in the US are beaten until bloody with leather belts. Do you make those illegal? You can't. Just because someone may do something immoral with an object doesn't mean that object should be banned. At least not in a democratic country.SkylinePigeon
Belts serve a very practical purpose, and it is relatively easy to identify children who are beaten until bloody with leather belts. You cannot realistically identify which women are being forced to wear a burqa and which are not, and it also prevents us as a society from identifying women who are beaten until bloody with things like leather belts.

To some Muslim women, a burqa is practical. It protects what she sees as most sacred--her body. Parents can hide their children, make them wear long sleeves and pants, etc. Abuse is unfortunately easier to hide than it seems you think. It's not a perfect analogy, but regardless I think you understand the point I was trying to make.

I see your point, but I disagree. Yes, abuse can be hidden successfully, but it's still relatively easier to identify an abused child than a woman being forced to wear a burqa.

As for the practically of the burqa that some women believe it has, here's an interesting and somewhat insightful op-ed byMona Eltahaway, a Muslim feminist.

Here's an excerpt:

"I wore a headscarf for nine years. An argument I had on the Cairo subway with a woman who wore a burqa helped seal for good my refusal to defend it. Dressed in black from head to toe, the woman asked me why I did not wear the burqa. I pointed to my headscarf and asked her "Is this not enough?"

"If you wanted a piece of candy, would you choose an unwrapped piece or one that came in a wrapper?" she asked."

Now obviously this is the view of just one woman who is "pro-burqa", but I doubt that she is alone in her opinion. I'd wager that quite a few women who wear the burqa think like that, because that's what they've been taught, that's all they know.

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#230 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

All in all, I despise the burqah as a Muslim.

Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#231 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts

in the U.S., they would not let a person wear or put up clearly racist messages.redstorm72

Yes they do.

Also, as for Germany, you should know as a gamer that this is a bad, baaad example.

Avatar image for majoras_wrath
majoras_wrath

6062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#232 majoras_wrath
Member since 2005 • 6062 Posts
You guys realize that the Burqa isn't exclusive to Muslims right? Orthodox Jewish women wear this garment too, as a personal choice. Don't be so narrow-minded as to place all the "abuse of women" offenses on Muslims. France has no right to ordain a national dress code. Any American saying that they do should be ashamed, considering we supposedly value freedom so much. Oh right, there seems to be an irrational fear and hatred of Muslims going around based on the actions of a small radical group. You know what I say? I say we should all be afraid of Christians, because there of Fred Phelps and his radicalism. Or any number of christian terrorists over the years.
Avatar image for redstorm72
redstorm72

4646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#233 redstorm72
Member since 2008 • 4646 Posts

[QUOTE="redstorm72"]

in the U.S., they would not let a person wear or put up clearly racist messages.PannicAtack

Yes they do.

Also, as for Germany, you should know as a gamer that this is a bad, baaad example.

My point was that nations limit freedoms all the time to protect the ideals of that nation. France is very pro equality, so something that is seen as a representation of the oppression of women will be banned. Also, I though my example of the banning of Nazi symbols in Germany was a fair example. Modern Germany has limited the freedom of expression of it's citizens because these symbols represent something that modern Germany is against.
Avatar image for majoras_wrath
majoras_wrath

6062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#234 majoras_wrath
Member since 2005 • 6062 Posts

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]

[QUOTE="redstorm72"]

in the U.S., they would not let a person wear or put up clearly racist messages.redstorm72

Yes they do.

Also, as for Germany, you should know as a gamer that this is a bad, baaad example.

My point was that nations limit freedoms all the time to protect the ideals of that nation. France is very pro equality, so something that is seen as a representation of the oppression of women will be banned. Also, I though my example of the banning of Nazi symbols in Germany was a fair example. Modern Germany has limited the freedom of expression of it's citizens because these symbols represent something that modern Germany is against.

The point is, to many Muslim women it's not a symbol of oppression. How can you as an outsider claim that it is?

Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#235 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]

[QUOTE="redstorm72"]

in the U.S., they would not let a person wear or put up clearly racist messages.redstorm72

Yes they do.

Also, as for Germany, you should know as a gamer that this is a bad, baaad example.

My point was that nations limit freedoms all the time to protect the ideals of that nation. France is very pro equality, so something that is seen as a representation of the oppression of women will be banned. Also, I though my example of the banning of Nazi symbols in Germany was a fair example. Modern Germany has limited the freedom of expression of it's citizens because these symbols represent something that modern Germany is against.

It also resulted in neutering Wolfenstein and making "I Have No Mouth And I Must Scream" unwinnable.
Avatar image for David_Skip
David_Skip

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#236 David_Skip
Member since 2010 • 137 Posts

Sucks to be a muslim woman living in France. They could always make the short journey over to England. We let anyone live in our Country.

Avatar image for UnknownSniper65
UnknownSniper65

9238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#237 UnknownSniper65
Member since 2004 • 9238 Posts

This is all a side effect of events that have long been forseen by anyone who was watching the fertility rates in Europe. The problem is the average person of true French descent is only having a small family. This would explain why France's fertility rate is 1.8. That means for every couple you have one or two children being born. That simply isn't enough to compete with Muslim immigrants who are having large families that consist of eight children. Muslims aren't taking over Europe by force, or even intentionally as a whole, they are just out breeding Europeans. You combine this with the fact that is traditionally taboo in Muslim societies for women to marry an non-islamic man and you have a religion that is designed to grow rapidly.

More laws like this are going to be passed ( as was seen in Switzerland) as Europeans begin to feel more of what they perceive as foreign influence in their countries. Small things that would have been glanced over 10 years ago (like a girl wearing a burka) become a big deal when 1/6 of the youth wear one (not an actual statistic I'm just using it for this analogy). Its not racism really, people are just feeling protective of their culture.

Avatar image for ariz3260
ariz3260

4209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#238 ariz3260
Member since 2006 • 4209 Posts

If the entire point of banning burqa is because it represents oppression toward women, I don't think that alone is enough justification to warrant a ban. Sure, you have freed those who were truly oppressed, but at the exact same time it becomes an oppression to those who wants to wear burqa out of their own free will. In the name of freeing an oppressed group, you have just put the same oppression upon another... is that a fair trade off?

I like to think of it as an abusive relationship. If a woman married to someone who abuses her physically and mentally, unless she comes out to testify against him and his crimes in court, there's not much anyone else can do about it.

Ones idea of freedom does not necessary mean the same thing for different people. Just because a burqa is the symbol of oppression for the western society, that doesn't necessarily make it so for different countries/cultures. Furthermore, how would one liberate people from being oppressed if the people you are trying to liberate don't think they are being oppressed? From the limited numbers of articles I've came across about this issue, it appears there are quite a few women who voluntarily chose to wear a burqa. These gals sure don't seem too oppressed to me.

Avatar image for KittenNipples
KittenNipples

3013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#239 KittenNipples
Member since 2007 • 3013 Posts
Interesting.
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#240 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

Seems like an intolerant, totalitarian move to me.

67gt500

Why? French people, especially women, travelling abroad to Arab countries would be expected to obey and conform to Islamic standards of dress and public behavior, or face severe 'intolerance' at the hands of their 'totalitarian' regime(s)... why then, should concessions be made for Arabs in France?

By that argument, it would be fair to abuse POW's, just because the other side does so. Fact is, two wrongs do not make a right.

Avatar image for weezyfb
weezyfb

14703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#241 weezyfb
Member since 2009 • 14703 Posts
wish the US could be tolerant like Western Europe.....Omni-Slash
Pretty much this.
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#242 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

This is only cool when europe and USA do it.. if the middle east or china does something like this though....... yea.. they are the worst places ever!! TEH FREEDOM!!

Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#243 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts

If the entire point of banning burqa is because it represents oppression toward women, I don't think that alone is enough justification to warrant a ban.

ariz3260
well that's the other thing, in that the ban isn't for women's rights at all. it's because France and the rest of Europe are notoriously xenophobic and are trying to contain the problem before we get another Holocaust or Inquisition.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#244 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180197 Posts
Eh. France has the right to enact their laws. Others have the right to chose not to live there.
Avatar image for Zerkrender
Zerkrender

633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#245 Zerkrender
Member since 2007 • 633 Posts
Eh. France has the right to enact their laws. Others have the right to chose not to live there. LJS9502_basic
This is what I meant to say in my first post. I would live in any country as long as I had the right to leave(other than by dieing.)
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#246 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

Eh. France has the right to enact their laws. Others have the right to chose not to live there. LJS9502_basic

Must suck for the people already in France who either have nowhere to go or are without the resources to just up and leave the country.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#247 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180197 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Eh. France has the right to enact their laws. Others have the right to chose not to live there. Theokhoth

Must suck for the people already in France who either have nowhere to go or are without the resources to just up and leave the country.

And that is the real world........not everyone agrees with the laws their society enacts.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#248 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts
Now, im in desperate need for an explanation. you, the westerners always brag about how FREE you can live, and how we -the religious people- are closed minded. you always and constantly talk about gay marriage and gay rights. im hate the veil with a passion, but if somebody want to go that religious let them be. and how exactly is this a part of Freedom :roll:
Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#249 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts
another thing, Europe and the USA should kick all muslims out and get it over with. Seriously, we just dont mix at all. and about the muslims living in Europe and the USA, why living their in the first place?
Avatar image for tycoonmike
tycoonmike

6082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#250 tycoonmike
Member since 2005 • 6082 Posts

another thing, Europe and the USA should kick all muslims out and get it over with. Seriously, we just dont mix at all. and about the muslims living in Europe and the USA, why living their in the first place? GazaAli

Yeah. We do that, and we end up going back to the days of the OPEC embargo. Besides, what you may see on the news is by no means the reality of the situation in the United States or, assumedly, Europe. There is only a very small minority of people, fundamentalist Christians mostly, who loathe Muslims. On the whole, I would think that people are tolerant and supportive of Islam and Islamic culture. It's ethnocentrism, like that which is being debated in France, that causes others to hate the West so much.