Reports of eight to 20 shot at Sikh Temple in Oak Creek

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#251 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"]

This is horrible, another shooter already? This isexactly what happens when gun posession is allowed and hicks still cling on to their right to own guns.
Isn't thereenough blood shed already because of several shootings like these?

DrTrafalgarLaw

Yes, yes blame the guns, guns make people go crazy, blah blah blah. :|

How about we take self responsibility for once and acknowledge that the shooter may have acted on racist intent? And that we should start educating ourselves on the difference between Sikhs and Muslims or better yet not show prejudice to any religious group.

Why don't we give every idiot a gun so we can solve people cutting in lines with a shoot-out? By legislating guns, we're only making it easier to give total nutcases access to guns. Guns are made to kill people, unless you're an assasin or a hitman or some sort, I don't see the need of anyone owning a gun besides the police and the army. So why does ANYONE want to own a gun? So you can use the very offchance you're actually in your right to use it as self-defense or other? That makes up for the countless people dying because of the gun legislation? We're from europe and we find it totally nuts that you can own a gun in the states. That's practically asking for trouble.

if some one comes at with a knife (happend to me in japan, if i had a gun then, i wouldnt have effing scarrs all over my arm) id like to be able to shoot him.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#252 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180198 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="thebest31406"] And the witnesses say it was more than one... Well, something's going on; acting like witness accounts shouldn't at least be taken in consideration. Also, why do you get all hot and bothered when someone condemns a white guy for committing murder as if someone accused you of murder?thebest31406

WTF are you on? I didn't say anything of the sort. I gave our conspiracy nut a quote from the police that it's one shooter.

And the witnesses say it was more than one...

A couple. Not all. Now explain where the other shooters disappeared to with the police all over the place and your famous witnesses.....

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#253 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180198 Posts
[QUOTE="UnknownSniper65"]

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] Would you give up your gun to prevent shootings like these?DrTrafalgarLaw

Would you give up your car to prevent horrifyingaccidents? Or your cell phone to prevent texting and driving?

I don't own a car and I don't plan on owning one in the near future. Those things are death traps. Your analogy is horribily wrong though, guns are designed to kill people...cell phones are not.

Guns are designed to fire a round. What you do with it your own intent. One can shoot targets all day long without killing anyone.
Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#254 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

I saw we ban the household items that can be used to make bombs.

The shooter obviously wouldn't try to obtain a weapon illegally either, even though he was willing to illegally kill innocent people. We all know how hard it is to obtain illegal things like weed that are ingrained in our culture.

Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#255 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"][QUOTE="leviathan91"]

Yes, yes blame the guns, guns make people go crazy, blah blah blah. :|

How about we take self responsibility for once and acknowledge that the shooter may have acted on racist intent? And that we should start educating ourselves on the difference between Sikhs and Muslims or better yet not show prejudice to any religious group.

frannkzappa

Why don't we give every idiot a gun so we can solve people cutting in lines with a shoot-out? By legislating guns, we're only making it easier to give total nutcases access to guns. Guns are made to kill people, unless you're an assasin or a hitman or some sort, I don't see the need of anyone owning a gun besides the police and the army. So why does ANYONE want to own a gun? So you can use the very offchance you're actually in your right to use it as self-defense or other? That makes up for the countless people dying because of the gun legislation? We're from europe and we find it totally nuts that you can own a gun in the states. That's practically asking for trouble.

if some one comes at with a knife (happend to me in japan, if i had a gun then, i wouldnt have effing scarrs all over my arm) id like to be able to shoot him.

That sucks man, but you wouldn't need a gun...having a knife on your own would be deterrant enough. No need to pull out a gun everytime you feel threathened.
Avatar image for UnknownSniper65
UnknownSniper65

9238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#256 UnknownSniper65
Member since 2004 • 9238 Posts

[QUOTE="UnknownSniper65"]

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] Would you give up your gun to prevent shootings like these?DrTrafalgarLaw

Would you give up your car to prevent horrifyingaccidents? Or your cell phone to prevent texting and driving?

I don't own a car and I don't plan on owning one in the near future. Those things are death traps. Your analogy is horribily wrong though, guns are designed to kill people...cell phones are not.

Guns are designed to shoot a projectile and it just so happens it can be used in a violent manner. Cell phones can be used to set off IEDs and bombs remotely. An object is only capable of what a person is doing with it.

Plenty of people own guns and never commit a crime in their life. I haven't even gotten a parking or speeding ticket.

Avatar image for thebest31406
thebest31406

3775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#257 thebest31406
Member since 2004 • 3775 Posts

[QUOTE="thebest31406"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] WTF are you on? I didn't say anything of the sort. I gave our conspiracy nut a quote from the police that it's one shooter. LJS9502_basic

And the witnesses say it was more than one...

A couple. Not all. Now explain where the other shooters disappeared to with the police all over the place and your famous witnesses.....

See? This is what I'm taking about; the cop's word is gold and to hell with witnesses.
Avatar image for Acemaster27
Acemaster27

4482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#258 Acemaster27
Member since 2004 • 4482 Posts
My thoughts and prayers go out to the victims :(
Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#259 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

[QUOTE="frannkzappa"]

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] Why don't we give every idiot a gun so we can solve people cutting in lines with a shoot-out? By legislating guns, we're only making it easier to give total nutcases access to guns. Guns are made to kill people, unless you're an assasin or a hitman or some sort, I don't see the need of anyone owning a gun besides the police and the army. So why does ANYONE want to own a gun? So you can use the very offchance you're actually in your right to use it as self-defense or other? That makes up for the countless people dying because of the gun legislation? We're from europe and we find it totally nuts that you can own a gun in the states. That's practically asking for trouble.DrTrafalgarLaw

if some one comes at with a knife (happend to me in japan, if i had a gun then, i wouldnt have effing scarrs all over my arm) id like to be able to shoot him.

That sucks man, but you wouldn't need a gun...having a knife on your own would be deterrant enough. No need to pull out a gun everytime you feel threathened.

A stabbing spree was stopped about a week ago by a guy who was carrying a hand gun.:|

Avatar image for thebest31406
thebest31406

3775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#260 thebest31406
Member since 2004 • 3775 Posts

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"][QUOTE="UnknownSniper65"]

Would you give up your car to prevent horrifyingaccidents? Or your cell phone to prevent texting and driving?

UnknownSniper65

I don't own a car and I don't plan on owning one in the near future. Those things are death traps. Your analogy is horribily wrong though, guns are designed to kill people...cell phones are not.

Guns are designed to shoot a projectile and it just so happens it can be used in a violent manner. Cell phones can be used to set of IEDs or bombs remotely. An object is only capable of what a person is doing with it.

Plenty of people own guns and never commit a crime in their life. I haven't even gotten a parking or speeding ticket.

Guns are lethal by design, dude.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#261 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180198 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="thebest31406"]

And the witnesses say it was more than one...

thebest31406

A couple. Not all. Now explain where the other shooters disappeared to with the police all over the place and your famous witnesses.....

See? This is what I'm taking about; the cop's word is gold and to hell with witnesses.

I see you are on the same reality with hartsick.:lol:
Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#262 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

[QUOTE="frannkzappa"]

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] Why don't we give every idiot a gun so we can solve people cutting in lines with a shoot-out? By legislating guns, we're only making it easier to give total nutcases access to guns. Guns are made to kill people, unless you're an assasin or a hitman or some sort, I don't see the need of anyone owning a gun besides the police and the army. So why does ANYONE want to own a gun? So you can use the very offchance you're actually in your right to use it as self-defense or other? That makes up for the countless people dying because of the gun legislation? We're from europe and we find it totally nuts that you can own a gun in the states. That's practically asking for trouble.DrTrafalgarLaw

if some one comes at with a knife (happend to me in japan, if i had a gun then, i wouldnt have effing scarrs all over my arm) id like to be able to shoot him.

That sucks man, but you wouldn't need a gun...having a knife on your own would be deterrant enough. No need to pull out a gun everytime you feel threathened.

yeah cause a knife fight would have been SOOOOOOO much fun.

oh, and have you ever been stabbed? not fun. not something im gonna risk repeating,

Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#263 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts
[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"][QUOTE="UnknownSniper65"]

Would you give up your car to prevent horrifyingaccidents? Or your cell phone to prevent texting and driving?

LJS9502_basic
I don't own a car and I don't plan on owning one in the near future. Those things are death traps. Your analogy is horribily wrong though, guns are designed to kill people...cell phones are not.

Guns are designed to fire a round. What you do with it your own intent. One can shoot targets all day long without killing anyone.

You can shoot targets with a bow, with a paintball gun...with many other things that are non lethal. You expect me to believe that a bullet that's designed to have a large penetrating force to top if off with a massive amount of lead that can poison people, is not designed to kill people/living things?
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#264 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180198 Posts
[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] I don't own a car and I don't plan on owning one in the near future. Those things are death traps. Your analogy is horribily wrong though, guns are designed to kill people...cell phones are not.

Guns are designed to fire a round. What you do with it your own intent. One can shoot targets all day long without killing anyone.

You can shoot targets with a bow, with a paintball gun...with many other things that are non lethal. You expect me to believe that a bullet that's designed to have a large penetrating force to top if off with a massive amount of lead that can poison people, is not designed to kill people/living things?

Again it depends on INTENT. You do not have to fire a gun at people. Second....you better not be eating meat/fish. That would make you a hypocrite since the diet of a carnivore demands killing animals.
Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#265 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"][QUOTE="frannkzappa"]

if some one comes at with a knife (happend to me in japan, if i had a gun then, i wouldnt have effing scarrs all over my arm) id like to be able to shoot him.

frannkzappa

That sucks man, but you wouldn't need a gun...having a knife on your own would be deterrant enough. No need to pull out a gun everytime you feel threathened.

yeah cause a knife fight would have been SOOOOOOO much fun.

You seriously would have shot him if he pulled out a knife?
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#266 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180198 Posts
[QUOTE="frannkzappa"]

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] That sucks man, but you wouldn't need a gun...having a knife on your own would be deterrant enough. No need to pull out a gun everytime you feel threathened.DrTrafalgarLaw

yeah cause a knife fight would have been SOOOOOOO much fun.

You seriously would have shot him if he pulled out a knife?

Would be the smart thing to do rather than maybe being stabbed to death...no?
Avatar image for UnknownSniper65
UnknownSniper65

9238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#267 UnknownSniper65
Member since 2004 • 9238 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] I don't own a car and I don't plan on owning one in the near future. Those things are death traps. Your analogy is horribily wrong though, guns are designed to kill people...cell phones are not.DrTrafalgarLaw
Guns are designed to fire a round. What you do with it your own intent. One can shoot targets all day long without killing anyone.

You can shoot targets with a bow, with a paintball gun...with many other things that are non lethal. You expect me to believe that a bullet that's designed to have a large penetrating force to top if off with a massive amount of lead that can poison people, is not designed to kill people/living things?

arrowhead-ah-1.jpg

Clearly not a lethal projectile

Avatar image for MgamerBD
MgamerBD

17550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#268 MgamerBD
Member since 2006 • 17550 Posts
[QUOTE="MgamerBD"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Not this crap about guns again.LJS9502_basic
Because clearly a gun was not used.

Because clearly the gun fired itself....

Would have never happened if guns were so easy to get in the first place. And where is the power of the second amendment now? I just see the lives of the innocent being lost. Not even the suspect.
Avatar image for thebest31406
thebest31406

3775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#269 thebest31406
Member since 2004 • 3775 Posts
[QUOTE="thebest31406"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] A couple. Not all. Now explain where the other shooters disappeared to with the police all over the place and your famous witnesses.....LJS9502_basic
See? This is what I'm taking about; the cop's word is gold and to hell with witnesses.

I see you are on the same reality with hartsick.:lol:

Right.
Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#270 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

[QUOTE="frannkzappa"]

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] That sucks man, but you wouldn't need a gun...having a knife on your own would be deterrant enough. No need to pull out a gun everytime you feel threathened.DrTrafalgarLaw

yeah cause a knife fight would have been SOOOOOOO much fun.

You seriously would have shot him if he pulled out a knife?

the m other f ucker stabbed me idiot.

if i hadn't been in japan and owned a gun ,yeah, i would have shot him.

Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#271 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Guns are designed to fire a round. What you do with it your own intent. One can shoot targets all day long without killing anyone.

You can shoot targets with a bow, with a paintball gun...with many other things that are non lethal. You expect me to believe that a bullet that's designed to have a large penetrating force to top if off with a massive amount of lead that can poison people, is not designed to kill people/living things?

Again it depends on INTENT. You do not have to fire a gun at people. Second....you better not be eating meat/fish. That would make you a hypocrite since the diet of a carnivore demands killing animals.

So what is this INTENT of a person buying a gun? Just to own it? Gotta collect them all?
Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#272 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"]

This is horrible, another shooter already? This isexactly what happens when gun posession is allowed and hicks still cling on to their right to own guns.
Isn't thereenough blood shed already because of several shootings like these?

DrTrafalgarLaw

Yes, yes blame the guns, guns make people go crazy, blah blah blah. :|

How about we take self responsibility for once and acknowledge that the shooter may have acted on racist intent? And that we should start educating ourselves on the difference between Sikhs and Muslims or better yet not show prejudice to any religious group.

Why don't we give every idiot a gun so we can solve people cutting in lines with a shoot-out? By legislating guns, we're only making it easier to give total nutcases access to guns. Guns are made to kill people, unless you're an assasin or a hitman or some sort, I don't see the need of anyone owning a gun besides the police and the army. So why does ANYONE want to own a gun? So you can use the very offchance you're actually in your right to use it as self-defense or other? That makes up for the countless people dying because of the gun legislation? We're from europe and we find it totally nuts that you can own a gun in the states. That's practically asking for trouble.

You have a messed up view of our country. Those nutcases do NOT represent the entirety of our country. There are many law-abiding citizens that own guns just as there are law-abiding people in your European countries that do drugs that would be illegal in our country.

There are many reasons to why the crime rate in the United States is high such as the failure of the Drug War and gang activity among other things, as well as the failure of our education system. Guns are used but intent and lack of education is the main problem. And my experiences with guns have taught me one thing: A huge sense of discipline that I came to appreciate when it came to handling and firing a gun. Yeah I know, it's weird, maybe not everyone sees it that way but I liked it and I usually like to bend the rules to my pleasure.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#273 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180198 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="MgamerBD"] Because clearly a gun was not used.MgamerBD
Because clearly the gun fired itself....

Would have never happened if guns were so easy to get in the first place. And where is the power of the second amendment now? I just see the lives of the innocent being lost. Not even the suspect.

Most crimes are committed with illegal firearms.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#274 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180198 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] You can shoot targets with a bow, with a paintball gun...with many other things that are non lethal. You expect me to believe that a bullet that's designed to have a large penetrating force to top if off with a massive amount of lead that can poison people, is not designed to kill people/living things?DrTrafalgarLaw
Again it depends on INTENT. You do not have to fire a gun at people. Second....you better not be eating meat/fish. That would make you a hypocrite since the diet of a carnivore demands killing animals.

So what is this INTENT of a person buying a gun? Just to own it? Gotta collect them all?

Duh some people are collectors, some like target practice, some for protection, and some for hunting. And as I said...you best not eat meat or you're a hypocrite dude.

Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#275 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] You can shoot targets with a bow, with a paintball gun...with many other things that are non lethal. You expect me to believe that a bullet that's designed to have a large penetrating force to top if off with a massive amount of lead that can poison people, is not designed to kill people/living things?DrTrafalgarLaw
Again it depends on INTENT. You do not have to fire a gun at people. Second....you better not be eating meat/fish. That would make you a hypocrite since the diet of a carnivore demands killing animals.

So what is this INTENT of a person buying a gun? Just to own it? Gotta collect them all?

I bought a gun cause i was stabbed and mugged , and i didn't want that to happen again.

Seemed like a good reason to me.

Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#276 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"][QUOTE="frannkzappa"]

yeah cause a knife fight would have been SOOOOOOO much fun.

frannkzappa

You seriously would have shot him if he pulled out a knife?

the m other f ucker stabbed me idiot.

if i hadn't been in japan and owned a gun ,yeah, i would have shot him.

I said if he just pulled out his knife and not directly stabbed you with it. There are multiple ways to deal with someone trying to stab you, not all of them involve guns.
Avatar image for UnknownSniper65
UnknownSniper65

9238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#277 UnknownSniper65
Member since 2004 • 9238 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] You can shoot targets with a bow, with a paintball gun...with many other things that are non lethal. You expect me to believe that a bullet that's designed to have a large penetrating force to top if off with a massive amount of lead that can poison people, is not designed to kill people/living things?DrTrafalgarLaw
Again it depends on INTENT. You do not have to fire a gun at people. Second....you better not be eating meat/fish. That would make you a hypocrite since the diet of a carnivore demands killing animals.

So what is this INTENT of a person buying a gun? Just to own it? Gotta collect them all?

Hunting,self defense, home defense,hobby,etc

I know plenty of law abiding people who own legal semiautomatic AKs,AR-15s,etc. I also know small business owners who carry a concealed pistol because they carry large amounts of cash around.

Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#278 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] You can shoot targets with a bow, with a paintball gun...with many other things that are non lethal. You expect me to believe that a bullet that's designed to have a large penetrating force to top if off with a massive amount of lead that can poison people, is not designed to kill people/living things?DrTrafalgarLaw
Again it depends on INTENT. You do not have to fire a gun at people. Second....you better not be eating meat/fish. That would make you a hypocrite since the diet of a carnivore demands killing animals.

So what is this INTENT of a person buying a gun? Just to own it? Gotta collect them all?

Target shooting, hunting, collecting, self-defense.

Hunting is pretty big here in the U.S.

Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#279 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

[QUOTE="frannkzappa"]

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] You seriously would have shot him if he pulled out a knife?DrTrafalgarLaw

the m other f ucker stabbed me idiot.

if i hadn't been in japan and owned a gun ,yeah, i would have shot him.

I said if he just pulled out his knife and not directly stabbed you with it. There are multiple ways to deal with someone trying to stab you, not all of them involve guns.

Keep telling yourself that.

I'm sure if i hugged him and aked how his day was going he wouldn't have stabbed me and taken my money.

Avatar image for thebest31406
thebest31406

3775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#280 thebest31406
Member since 2004 • 3775 Posts

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Again it depends on INTENT. You do not have to fire a gun at people. Second....you better not be eating meat/fish. That would make you a hypocrite since the diet of a carnivore demands killing animals.SpartanMSU

So what is this INTENT of a person buying a gun? Just to own it? Gotta collect them all?

Target shooting, hunting, collecting, self-defense.

Hunting is pretty big here in the U.S.

But mostly to kill folk; the numbers don't lie.
Avatar image for UnknownSniper65
UnknownSniper65

9238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#281 UnknownSniper65
Member since 2004 • 9238 Posts

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Again it depends on INTENT. You do not have to fire a gun at people. Second....you better not be eating meat/fish. That would make you a hypocrite since the diet of a carnivore demands killing animals.SpartanMSU

So what is this INTENT of a person buying a gun? Just to own it? Gotta collect them all?

Target shooting, hunting, collecting, self-defense.

Hunting is pretty big here in the U.S.

Honestly, I would be surprised to find that most crimes are committed with expensive guns like those used by enthusiasts.

Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#282 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Again it depends on INTENT. You do not have to fire a gun at people. Second....you better not be eating meat/fish. That would make you a hypocrite since the diet of a carnivore demands killing animals.frannkzappa

So what is this INTENT of a person buying a gun? Just to own it? Gotta collect them all?

I bought a gun cause i was stabbed and mugged , and i didn't want that to happen again.

Seemed like a good reason to me.

How about self-defense training, instead of rushing out to buy a gun? I've been threathened and was subject of being mugged before, I still don't have the need to to buy a gun. If I happen to get stabbed or shot at, tough luck for me.

Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#284 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

[QUOTE="frannkzappa"]

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] So what is this INTENT of a person buying a gun? Just to own it? Gotta collect them all?DrTrafalgarLaw

I bought a gun cause i was stabbed and mugged , and i didn't want that to happen again.

Seemed like a good reason to me.

How about self-defense training, instead of rushing out to buy a gun? I've been threathened and was subject of being mugged before, I still don't have the need to to buy a gun. If I happen to get stabbed or shot at, tough luck for me.

I'm beginning to think your not too bright.

Avatar image for thebest31406
thebest31406

3775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#285 thebest31406
Member since 2004 • 3775 Posts

[QUOTE="thebest31406"][QUOTE="SpartanMSU"]

Target shooting, hunting, collecting, self-defense.

Hunting is pretty big here in the U.S.

SpartanMSU

But mostly to kill folk; the numbers don't lie.

No. You are a fvcking retard.

looool jeez; you would have though I was talking about members of your family.
Avatar image for DeathnoteSz
DeathnoteSz

643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#286 DeathnoteSz
Member since 2010 • 643 Posts

According to recent information broadcast over police radio, a witness to the shooting told law enforcement the shooter was a white male, with a heavy build, bald head and wearing a sleeveless T-shirt. He was last seen with two handguns oh dearMrPraline
is anyone suprised??

Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#287 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"]

[QUOTE="frannkzappa"]

I bought a gun cause i was stabbed and mugged , and i didn't want that to happen again.

Seemed like a good reason to me.

frannkzappa

How about self-defense training, instead of rushing out to buy a gun? I've been threathened and was subject of being mugged before, I still don't have the need to buy a gun. If I happen to get stabbed or shot at, tough luck for me.

I'm beginning to think your not to bright.

Says the one writing you're with "your". My native language isn't english btw, before you start ragging on my english. Not fearing death isn't the same as wanting to die as soon as possible. You could die any moment, there is no reason to arm myself with a gun for the very offchance someone pulls out a knife or a gun. I don't want to live in constant fear and distrusting everyone, in the fear that anyone could mug, harass or kill you at any moment. That's how a gun-slinging trigger-happy society is born.
Avatar image for UnknownSniper65
UnknownSniper65

9238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#288 UnknownSniper65
Member since 2004 • 9238 Posts

In a good amount of rural towns in the United States the local police stop patroling at a certain time. That means that any emergencyresponse is going to come from either the state police or the county sheriff. It could take a while before they get there that is assuming the best conditions and you actually manage to call 911.

Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#289 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

[QUOTE="frannkzappa"]

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] How about self-defense training, instead of rushing out to buy a gun? I've been threathened and was subject of being mugged before, I still don't have the need to buy a gun. If I happen to get stabbed or shot at, tough luck for me.

DrTrafalgarLaw

I'm beginning to think your not to bright.

Says the one writing you're with "your". My native language isn't english btw, before you start ragging on my english. Not fearing death isn't the same as wanting to die as soon as possible. You could die any moment, there is no reason to arm myself with a gun for the very offchance someone pulls out a knife or a gun. I don't want to live in constant fear and distrusting everyone, in the fear that anyone could mug, harass or kill you at any moment. That's how a gun-slinging trigger-happy society is born.

i just do what spell check tells me, im an engineer not a grammar teacher.

but in all seriousness if i die, id rather it not be from stab wounds.

Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#290 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts

In a good amount of rural towns in the United States the local police stop patroling at a certain time. That means that any emergencyresponse is going to come from either the state police or the county sheriff. It could take a while before they get there that is assuming the best conditions and you actually manage to call 911.

UnknownSniper65
Isn't it ironic how gun legislation allows people to get their hands on a gun easily to commit crimes in rural areas, and to counter that is to provide the victims in rural areas with guns also? What on earth would this solve? They have guns, so we should too? How about just take away their guns? That last one would provide much more benefits on the long run.
Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#291 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

[QUOTE="UnknownSniper65"]

In a good amount of rural towns in the United States the local police stop patroling at a certain time. That means that any emergencyresponse is going to come from either the state police or the county sheriff. It could take a while before they get there that is assuming the best conditions and you actually manage to call 911.

DrTrafalgarLaw

Isn't it ironic how gun legislation allows people to get their hands on a gun easily to commit crimes in rural areas, and to counter that is to provide the victims in rural areas with guns also? What on earth would this solve? They have guns, so we should too? How about just take away their guns? That last one would provide much more benefits on the long run.

You still don't get it, do you? At least try to see the other sides' viewpoint.

YOU CAN STILL OBTAIN GUNS ILLEGALLY. GET THAT THROUGH YOUR HEAD.

Avatar image for UnknownSniper65
UnknownSniper65

9238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#292 UnknownSniper65
Member since 2004 • 9238 Posts

[QUOTE="UnknownSniper65"]

In a good amount of rural towns in the United States the local police stop patroling at a certain time. That means that any emergencyresponse is going to come from either the state police or the county sheriff. It could take a while before they get there that is assuming the best conditions and you actually manage to call 911.

DrTrafalgarLaw

Isn't it ironic how gun legislation allows people to get their hands on a gun easily to commit crimes in rural areas, and to counter that is to provide the victims in rural areas with guns also? What on earth would this solve? They have guns, so we should too? How about just take away their guns? That last one would provide much more benefits on the long run.

I'm not even talking about guns. In fact the last real murder to happen in my area was committed with a knife. Most guns used in crimes aren't even obtained legally to begin with. Somebody isn't going to use a gun in a crime knowing it could trace back to them.

Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#293 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts

[QUOTE="UnknownSniper65"]

In a good amount of rural towns in the United States the local police stop patroling at a certain time. That means that any emergencyresponse is going to come from either the state police or the county sheriff. It could take a while before they get there that is assuming the best conditions and you actually manage to call 911.

DrTrafalgarLaw

Isn't it ironic how gun legislation allows people to get their hands on a gun easily to commit crimes in rural areas, and to counter that is to provide the victims in rural areas with guns also? What on earth would this solve? They have guns, so we should too? How about just take away their guns? That last one would provide much more benefits on the long run.

You are very naive.

Gun control isn't necessarily crime control. If you want to reduce crime, reduce intent. The problem with our country is how justice is served. We're tough on crime but we're not big on recidivism which works much more effectively in helping and reforming criminals so they don't become repeat offenders.

Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#294 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"][QUOTE="UnknownSniper65"]

In a good amount of rural towns in the United States the local police stop patroling at a certain time. That means that any emergencyresponse is going to come from either the state police or the county sheriff. It could take a while before they get there that is assuming the best conditions and you actually manage to call 911.

SpartanMSU

Isn't it ironic how gun legislation allows people to get their hands on a gun easily to commit crimes in rural areas, and to counter that is to provide the victims in rural areas with guns also? What on earth would this solve? They have guns, so we should too? How about just take away their guns? That last one would provide much more benefits on the long run.

You still don't get it, do you? At least try to see the other sides' viewpoint.

YOU CAN STILL OBTAIN GUNS ILLEGALLY. GET THAT THROUGH YOUR HEAD.

Then let your government do something about guns obtained illegally instead of waging countless wars in far-off countries. I understand you can't have a full 100% control on gun production and where and who these guns are being sold too. But I imagine you can control gun ownership at different levels. Your gun is useless without ammunation. So even if someone would obtain a gun illegally, he or she would still need bullets for it. You could even control how individual parts of the guns are sold and stores for the offchance someone decides to build a conceiled gun factory. And YOU CAN STILL CALL THE COPS. GET THAT TROUGH YOUR HEAD - allcapsrage
Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#295 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

[QUOTE="SpartanMSU"]

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] Isn't it ironic how gun legislation allows people to get their hands on a gun easily to commit crimes in rural areas, and to counter that is to provide the victims in rural areas with guns also? What on earth would this solve? They have guns, so we should too? How about just take away their guns? That last one would provide much more benefits on the long run.DrTrafalgarLaw

You still don't get it, do you? At least try to see the other sides' viewpoint.

YOU CAN STILL OBTAIN GUNS ILLEGALLY. GET THAT THROUGH YOUR HEAD.

Then let your government do something about guns obtained illegally instead of waging countless wars in far-off countries. I understand you can't have a full 100% control on gun production and where and who these guns are being sold too. But I imagine you can control gun ownership at different levels. Your gun is useless without ammunation. So even if someone would obtain a gun illegally, he or she would still need bullets for it. You could even control how individual parts of the guns are sold and stores for the offchance someone decides to build a conceiled gun factory. And YOU CAN STILL CALL THE COPS. GET THAT TROUGH YOUR HEAD - allcapsrage

My god, you really are that dumb.

If I can obtain guns illegally, don't you think I could also obtain ammunition? Also, research Prohibition and the War on Drugs. I can get weed easily whenever I want. If there is a high demand for it, there will be a supply.

And I wasn't aware a cop could be carried in my back pocket...idiot.

Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#296 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"][QUOTE="UnknownSniper65"]

In a good amount of rural towns in the United States the local police stop patroling at a certain time. That means that any emergencyresponse is going to come from either the state police or the county sheriff. It could take a while before they get there that is assuming the best conditions and you actually manage to call 911.

UnknownSniper65

Isn't it ironic how gun legislation allows people to get their hands on a gun easily to commit crimes in rural areas, and to counter that is to provide the victims in rural areas with guns also? What on earth would this solve? They have guns, so we should too? How about just take away their guns? That last one would provide much more benefits on the long run.

I'm not even talking about guns. In fact the last real murder to happen in my area was committed with a knife. Most guns used in crimes aren't even obtained legally to begin with. Somebody isn't going to use a gun in a crime knowing it could trace back to them.

Someone, somewhere has obviously bought that gun or maybe even stole it or manufactured it. Fact it, the lenient legislation of gun ownership has allowed guns to thrive in your society. Most crimes over here do not take place with a gun. Banning guns decriminalizes an area or country, part of enforcing the ban is doing strip searches on unsuspecting people. You can save a lot more lives by catching people red-handed with a gun and other lethal tools as a part of a country-wide ban on guns, then you would by endorsing to carry guns to counter trigger-happy criminals like these. I rest my case, I've said what I wanted and I should sleep. Goodnight everyone.
Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#297 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

[QUOTE="UnknownSniper65"]

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] Isn't it ironic how gun legislation allows people to get their hands on a gun easily to commit crimes in rural areas, and to counter that is to provide the victims in rural areas with guns also? What on earth would this solve? They have guns, so we should too? How about just take away their guns? That last one would provide much more benefits on the long run.DrTrafalgarLaw

I'm not even talking about guns. In fact the last real murder to happen in my area was committed with a knife. Most guns used in crimes aren't even obtained legally to begin with. Somebody isn't going to use a gun in a crime knowing it could trace back to them.

Someone, somewhere has obviously bought that gun or maybe even stole it or manufactured it. Fact it, the lenient legislation of gun ownership has allowed guns to thrive in your society. Most crimes over here do not take place with a gun. Banning guns decriminalizes an area or country, part of enforcing the ban is doing strip searches on unsuspecting people. You can save a lot more lives by catching people red-handed with a gun and other lethal tools as a part of a country-wide ban on guns, then you would by endorsing to carry guns to counter trigger-happy criminals like these. I rest my case, I've said what I wanted and I should sleep. Goodnight everyone.

i thank god that people like him hold no influence over our government.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#298 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45472 Posts
one angle I read regarding motive is that he may have carried this out in an attempt of violence against Muslims but didn't know Sikhs aren't Muslims, and he had a 9-11 tattoo on his arm... of course that doesn't conclude anything but it's an angle to look into, to be honest though that also crossed my mind as an option even before reading about it; anyhow, wonder what we'll find out
Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#299 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

one angle I read regarding motive is that he may have carried this out in an attempt of violence against Muslims but didn't know Sikhs aren't Muslims, and he had a 9-11 tattoo on his arm... of course that doesn't conclude anything but it's an angle to look into, to be honest though that also crossed my mind as an option even before reading about it; anyhow, wonder what we'll find out lamprey263

THANK YOU for at least attempting to get this thread back on track.

Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#300 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts

I can't believe this. No one takes responsibility for themselves anymore. That shooter acted on intent and would have carried out the attack whether he obtained the guns legally or illegally, the same with other high profile shooters. They didn't all decide to shoot up a group of people because they had a gun. They did it because they were sick in the head and planned it so meticulously.

Sometimes I wonder if the Brits in the past talked about banning knives due to Jack the Ripper attacks.