So Atheists, What's Your Rationale In Your Belief Of No God?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d3f5f1ece8fb
deactivated-5d3f5f1ece8fb

865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#651 deactivated-5d3f5f1ece8fb
Member since 2004 • 865 Posts

damn

I just read all 600 or whatever posts. I'm being honest. Atheism makes so much sense.

ah....it seems so wrong though.....I think because I was raised a Christian from a very young age (4 yrs old).

I started reading the God Delusion, but I'm kinda afraid to continue. I know I'm going to be an atheist when I'm done reading it.

Avatar image for FamiBox
FamiBox

5481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#652 FamiBox
Member since 2007 • 5481 Posts

damn

I just read all 600 or whatever posts. I'm being honest. Atheism makes so much sense.

ah....it seems so wrong though.....I think because I was raised a Christian from a very young age (4 yrs old).

I started reading the God Delusion, but I'm kinda afraid to continue. I know I'm going to be an atheist when I'm done reading it.

hi_im_dave

Finish reading it, damn it. :x

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#653 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

damn

I just read all 600 or whatever posts. I'm being honest. Atheism makes so much sense.

ah....it seems so wrong though.....I think because I was raised a Christian from a very young age (4 yrs old).

I started reading the God Delusion, but I'm kinda afraid to continue. I know I'm going to be an atheist when I'm done reading it.

hi_im_dave

Why are you afraid? There is no reason to be afraid of the truth.

Avatar image for HomicidalCherry
HomicidalCherry

959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#654 HomicidalCherry
Member since 2009 • 959 Posts

[QUOTE="HomicidalCherry"]

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"] Well, sure, if you treat every verse of the Bible in a literal manner you'll ultimately be disappointed. But I don't think that means that the core meaning of the stories are lost/unimportant/unbelievable.mattbbpl

Well obviously not everything is beyond reasonable belief, but I would think that any of the supernatural parts would be beyond reason to the impartial reader.

I'm not sure what you mean by supernatural, but I certainly believe in miracles. I see no reason why God incarnate being able to perform miracles wouldn't be believable.

Most of the supernatural parts, if I understant you correctly, are said to have been performed by God either directly or through others.

Any non-biased reader would have to have no opinion on God or miracles. In order for this person to believe that the miracles described in the Bible actually happened, they would have to make the assumptions that God exists, that Jesus is the son of God, that God is omnipotent, and that God (Jesus) committed the miracles described in the Bible. They would have to do all of this with no concrete evidence. No rational person would make so many large leaps in logic and so many assumptions just because it is written in a book unless they had the pre-conceived notion that this book was true.

Avatar image for BOBBALOOUUUUUU
BOBBALOOUUUUUU

434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#655 BOBBALOOUUUUUU
Member since 2005 • 434 Posts

show me a man that isnt a fool and i will show you god. show me a man that will show me god and i will show you a fool. if god exists then he will find me or i will stumble upon him. there will be no looking.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d3f5f1ece8fb
deactivated-5d3f5f1ece8fb

865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#656 deactivated-5d3f5f1ece8fb
Member since 2004 • 865 Posts

[QUOTE="hi_im_dave"]

damn

I just read all 600 or whatever posts. I'm being honest. Atheism makes so much sense.

ah....it seems so wrong though.....I think because I was raised a Christian from a very young age (4 yrs old).

I started reading the God Delusion, but I'm kinda afraid to continue. I know I'm going to be an atheist when I'm done reading it.

BumFluff122

Why are you afraid? There is no reason to be afraid of the truth.

I would break my mom's heart. I go to a Christian University. All of my friends are Christian. The list goes on.

I guess I don't have to tell them.

Avatar image for dhyce
dhyce

5609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#657 dhyce
Member since 2003 • 5609 Posts

Generally when I am to believe in something, proof or any scrap of evidence at all would be a good place to start.

Also, not believing in god is not a belief, it is a lack thereof.

Avatar image for hiphops_savior
hiphops_savior

8535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

#658 hiphops_savior
Member since 2007 • 8535 Posts

damn

I just read all 600 or whatever posts. I'm being honest. Atheism makes so much sense.

ah....it seems so wrong though.....I think because I was raised a Christian from a very young age (4 yrs old).

I started reading the God Delusion, but I'm kinda afraid to continue. I know I'm going to be an atheist when I'm done reading it.

hi_im_dave
Try the Dawkin's Delusion, it's the perfect antidote.
Avatar image for chrisrooR
chrisrooR

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#659 chrisrooR
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts
Complete lack of empirically reviewed evidence.
Avatar image for deactivated-5d3f5f1ece8fb
deactivated-5d3f5f1ece8fb

865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#660 deactivated-5d3f5f1ece8fb
Member since 2004 • 865 Posts

[QUOTE="hi_im_dave"]

damn

I just read all 600 or whatever posts. I'm being honest. Atheism makes so much sense.

ah....it seems so wrong though.....I think because I was raised a Christian from a very young age (4 yrs old).

I started reading the God Delusion, but I'm kinda afraid to continue. I know I'm going to be an atheist when I'm done reading it.

hiphops_savior

Try the Dawkin's Delusion, it's the perfect antidote.

Ya, I was thinking I should probably read both sides of the story.

Avatar image for hiphops_savior
hiphops_savior

8535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

#661 hiphops_savior
Member since 2007 • 8535 Posts

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="HomicidalCherry"]

Well obviously not everything is beyond reasonable belief, but I would think that any of the supernatural parts would be beyond reason to the impartial reader.

HomicidalCherry

I'm not sure what you mean by supernatural, but I certainly believe in miracles. I see no reason why God incarnate being able to perform miracles wouldn't be believable.

Most of the supernatural parts, if I understant you correctly, are said to have been performed by God either directly or through others.

Any non-biased reader would have to have no opinion on God or miracles. In order for this person to believe that the miracles described in the Bible actually happened, they would have to make the assumptions that God exists, that Jesus is the son of God, that God is omnipotent, and that God (Jesus) committed the miracles described in the Bible. They would have to do all of this with no concrete evidence. No rational person would make so many large leaps in logic and so many assumptions just because it is written in a book unless they had the pre-conceived notion that this book was true.

Neither would they believe that the Big Bang happened by random chance once they saw the numbers of the odds of the Big Bang happening and the chances of life to exist.
Avatar image for Pyro767
Pyro767

2305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#662 Pyro767
Member since 2009 • 2305 Posts
Their rationale is that there is no physical proof of his existence. That has always been their rationale, and that will always be their rationale. Just saying.
Avatar image for hiphops_savior
hiphops_savior

8535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

#663 hiphops_savior
Member since 2007 • 8535 Posts
There's no physical proof that life came out of nothing, or is there physical proof that God doesn't exist. It is simply impossible for science to prove or disprove God, and to assume he doesn't exist is a huge risk that dare I might say, takes more faith than believing in an omnipotent being who isn't limited in time and space.
Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#664 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60853 Posts

damn

I just read all 600 or whatever posts. I'm being honest. Atheism makes so much sense.

ah....it seems so wrong though.....I think because I was raised a Christian from a very young age (4 yrs old).

I started reading the God Delusion, but I'm kinda afraid to continue. I know I'm going to be an atheist when I'm done reading it.

hi_im_dave

the answer youre looking for is "indifference"

if someone asks if you believe in God, shrug and say "Beats me"

if they then ask if youre an atheist, shrug and say "I dont know, to be honest"

dont commit to either side. Just let your heart guide you. Sometimes you dont even know what your heart says.

Avatar image for HomicidalCherry
HomicidalCherry

959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#665 HomicidalCherry
Member since 2009 • 959 Posts

[QUOTE="HomicidalCherry"]

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"] I'm not sure what you mean by supernatural, but I certainly believe in miracles. I see no reason why God incarnate being able to perform miracles wouldn't be believable.

Most of the supernatural parts, if I understant you correctly, are said to have been performed by God either directly or through others.hiphops_savior

Any non-biased reader would have to have no opinion on God or miracles. In order for this person to believe that the miracles described in the Bible actually happened, they would have to make the assumptions that God exists, that Jesus is the son of God, that God is omnipotent, and that God (Jesus) committed the miracles described in the Bible. They would have to do all of this with no concrete evidence. No rational person would make so many large leaps in logic and so many assumptions just because it is written in a book unless they had the pre-conceived notion that this book was true.

Neither would they believe that the Big Bang happened by random chance once they saw the numbers of the odds of the Big Bang happening and the chances of life to exist.

Who said the Big Bang happened by chance? I haven't read up on the Big Bang theory lately, but last time I checked, chance wasn't the scientific cause. In fact, if relativity is true, then causality is a completely meaningless concept before the Big Bang. General Relativity breaks down and time becomes another meaningless construct when dealing with an object of such tremendous density. You can't find a reason for something happening in the absence of causality and time, not as we understand it at least. For the record, I don't avidly believe the Big Bang Theory. I find it interesting and believe it may have happened, however, the evidence isn't all that compelling (especially to someone without an astro-physics degree) at the moment.

I'm not gonna get into the whole odds of life one. There are so may different factors and the odds just get so complicated that any attempt to calculate the actual odds of life appearing a futile. Maybe the odds are low, but I'm not gonna spend several decades running all of the numbers and making sure I take into account every variable. But for the record, life appearing is bound by causality and did not happen by chance. It happened for physical reasons. Objects interacted in such a way that created life. There is nothing random about that.

Avatar image for FamiBox
FamiBox

5481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#666 FamiBox
Member since 2007 • 5481 Posts

[QUOTE="hi_im_dave"]

damn

I just read all 600 or whatever posts. I'm being honest. Atheism makes so much sense.

ah....it seems so wrong though.....I think because I was raised a Christian from a very young age (4 yrs old).

I started reading the God Delusion, but I'm kinda afraid to continue. I know I'm going to be an atheist when I'm done reading it.

mrbojangles25

the answer youre looking for is "indifference"

if someone asks if you believe in God, shrug and say "Beats me"

if they then ask if youre an atheist, shrug and say "I dont know, to be honest"

dont commit to either side. Just let your heart guide you. Sometimes you dont even know what your heart says.

Personally, I think with my brain. Logic is the key here. Don't let emotions sway you one way.

Avatar image for HarshGamer
HarshGamer

2822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#667 HarshGamer
Member since 2008 • 2822 Posts
The question now is, do any atheists believe in heaven or do they have any explanation as to that might not exist...
Avatar image for dhyce
dhyce

5609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#668 dhyce
Member since 2003 • 5609 Posts

There's no physical proof that life came out of nothing, or is there physical proof that God doesn't exist. It is simply impossible for science to prove or disprove God, and to assume he doesn't exist is a huge risk that dare I might say, takes more faith than believing in an omnipotent being who isn't limited in time and space.hiphops_savior

There is no such thing as proof that something does not exist and there is growing evidence for where life originated from. Stop applying things like faith to the lack of a belief, it is not the same thing. I don't see any reason to believe in a god, I see a universe with an explanation we will one day uncover, just like everything else throughout history previously believed to be god's work. To not believe in a concept without any evidence is not a matter of faith, in any way, it is the direct opposite. You are simply making up the rules of how proof, faith, and belief work as you go, based entirely on your own opinion. The mighty difference between what is subjective and objective.

Oh, going back to your justification of the 'huge risk' in question. That is completely irrelevant to the position of atheism, which is once again not a belief, rather a lack thereof. The idea that not believing in god will be of afterlife consequence means nothing to atheists, because the beliefs of a religion are completely extraneous from our own. Not to mention the matter of most religions each claiming to be the one true faith, and the general absurdity of a god caring about whether you believe in him/her/it/they or not. I mean, call me crazy, but if an omnipotent being actually existed, the notion that they would be so egotistical and callous as to hold belief without proof to higher esteem than - I don't know - what you've done with your life, makes me want to laugh so hard I vomit forth my entire digestive system.

Avatar image for Thessassin
Thessassin

1819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#669 Thessassin
Member since 2007 • 1819 Posts

well everybody has already said over 9000 times more than what i would have said regarding the issue so no point in beating a dead horse.

Avatar image for C_Town_Soul
C_Town_Soul

9489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#670 C_Town_Soul
Member since 2003 • 9489 Posts

There's no physical proof that life came out of nothing, or is there physical proof that God doesn't exist. It is simply impossible for science to prove or disprove God, and to assume he doesn't exist is a huge risk that dare I might say, takes more faith than believing in an omnipotent being who isn't limited in time and space.hiphops_savior
No one says that. Life on Earth is composed of 4 of the 5 most abundantly and naturally occuring elements in the universe: hydrogen, oxygen, carbon, and nitrogen.

Avatar image for BOBBALOOUUUUUU
BOBBALOOUUUUUU

434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#671 BOBBALOOUUUUUU
Member since 2005 • 434 Posts

show me a man that isnt a fool and i will show you god. show me a man that will show me god and i will show you a fool. if god exists then he will find me or i will stumble upon him. there will be no looking.

BOBBALOOUUUUUU

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#672 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

The question now is, do any atheists believe in heaven or do they have any explanation as to that might not exist...HarshGamer

Do you have an explanation showing that it does exist? And on top of that, which conceptualization of "heaven" are we going to talk about here? Clouds and angels with harps, or a realm of extreme bliss incomprehensible to the human mind?

Avatar image for Bi-Polaroid
Bi-Polaroid

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#673 Bi-Polaroid
Member since 2009 • 27 Posts

[QUOTE="HarshGamer"]The question now is, do any atheists believe in heaven or do they have any explanation as to that might not exist...foxhound_fox


Do you have an explanation showing that it does exist? And on top of that, which conceptualization of "heaven" are we going to talk about here? Clouds and angels with harps, or a realm of extreme bliss incomprehensible to the human mind?

Somebody plucking a harp all day long wouldn't be my idea of bliss that's for sure. In fact I'd find it downright annoying. I'm hoping heaven's moved with the times and taught angels to play music with modern instruments and preferably competent DJ'ing skills.
Avatar image for BOBBALOOUUUUUU
BOBBALOOUUUUUU

434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#674 BOBBALOOUUUUUU
Member since 2005 • 434 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]

[QUOTE="HarshGamer"]The question now is, do any atheists believe in heaven or do they have any explanation as to that might not exist...Bi-Polaroid


Do you have an explanation showing that it does exist? And on top of that, which conceptualization of "heaven" are we going to talk about here? Clouds and angels with harps, or a realm of extreme bliss incomprehensible to the human mind?

Somebody plucking a harp all day long wouldn't be my idea of bliss that's for sure. In fact I'd find it downright annoying. I'm hoping heaven's moved with the times and taught angels to play music with modern instruments and preferably competent DJ'ing skills.

i would prefer something with some soul. maybe some funk or jazz.

Avatar image for Bi-Polaroid
Bi-Polaroid

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#675 Bi-Polaroid
Member since 2009 • 27 Posts

[QUOTE="Bi-Polaroid"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
Do you have an explanation showing that it does exist? And on top of that, which conceptualization of "heaven" are we going to talk about here? Clouds and angels with harps, or a realm of extreme bliss incomprehensible to the human mind?

BOBBALOOUUUUUU

Somebody plucking a harp all day long wouldn't be my idea of bliss that's for sure. In fact I'd find it downright annoying. I'm hoping heaven's moved with the times and taught angels to play music with modern instruments and preferably competent DJ'ing skills.

i would prefer something with some soul. maybe some funk or jazz.

Lol - Soul would be very apt indeed.
Avatar image for C_Town_Soul
C_Town_Soul

9489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#676 C_Town_Soul
Member since 2003 • 9489 Posts

[QUOTE="Bi-Polaroid"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
Do you have an explanation showing that it does exist? And on top of that, which conceptualization of "heaven" are we going to talk about here? Clouds and angels with harps, or a realm of extreme bliss incomprehensible to the human mind?

BOBBALOOUUUUUU

Somebody plucking a harp all day long wouldn't be my idea of bliss that's for sure. In fact I'd find it downright annoying. I'm hoping heaven's moved with the times and taught angels to play music with modern instruments and preferably competent DJ'ing skills.

i would prefer something with some soul. maybe some funk or jazz.

I'd be dancing for the rest of all eternity

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#677 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="hi_im_dave"]

damn

I just read all 600 or whatever posts. I'm being honest. Atheism makes so much sense.

ah....it seems so wrong though.....I think because I was raised a Christian from a very young age (4 yrs old).

I started reading the God Delusion, but I'm kinda afraid to continue. I know I'm going to be an atheist when I'm done reading it.

hi_im_dave

Why are you afraid? There is no reason to be afraid of the truth.

No you don't. Atheism can either be internal or external much as theism can.

I would break my mom's heart. I go to a Christian University. All of my friends are Christian. The list goes on.

I guess I don't have to tell them.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#678 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="HomicidalCherry"]

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"] I'm not sure what you mean by supernatural, but I certainly believe in miracles. I see no reason why God incarnate being able to perform miracles wouldn't be believable.

Most of the supernatural parts, if I understant you correctly, are said to have been performed by God either directly or through others.hiphops_savior

Any non-biased reader would have to have no opinion on God or miracles. In order for this person to believe that the miracles described in the Bible actually happened, they would have to make the assumptions that God exists, that Jesus is the son of God, that God is omnipotent, and that God (Jesus) committed the miracles described in the Bible. They would have to do all of this with no concrete evidence. No rational person would make so many large leaps in logic and so many assumptions just because it is written in a book unless they had the pre-conceived notion that this book was true.

Neither would they believe that the Big Bang happened by random chance once they saw the numbers of the odds of the Big Bang happening and the chances of life to exist.

I've seen those odds before. It's all based on guesswork. They just take a random number and and said "Wow that seems like a pretty high number I'll use that." They fail to take into account all the forces at work within the universe. As I've stated before, everything works by cause and effect. The universe is destined to be this way because there is no other way it could be due to cause and effect. I often hear theists say things like "You guys don't even know matter-of-factly how life came from non-life..." Please explain to me if scientists don't know the exact composition of chemicals and occurrences present to make life how someone could make a guess on how likely life is due to the bi Bang. We are also actively searching for life outside of the Earth, some places are even within our own solar system. A few of these places have actual water on them such as the Europa. We have hardly looked anywhere within our own solar system for life. How then do you come to this number that life is so improbable?

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#679 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

The creationists's argument is a big chasm. They just cut to the conclusion and say "something can't come from nothing!". Most people here know that it's a flawed statement. But two questions remain: What really caused the big bang? And why did it have to be a random event?

Avatar image for Democratik
Democratik

662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#680 Democratik
Member since 2009 • 662 Posts

Oh, by the way, when I said to show me the facts supporting evolution, I was talking about evolution like going from one species to another. I definitely believe in adaptations and whatnot, but evolution from one species to another? Nuh-uh.

So please, present to me the concrete facts supporting the theory of evolution.

P.S. Don't expect a reply 'till Tuesday.

HipYoungster42
with enough small adaption you eventually get a new species
Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#681 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

Oh, by the way, when I said to show me the facts supporting evolution, I was talking about evolution like going from one species to another. I definitely believe in adaptations and whatnot, but evolution from one species to another? Nuh-uh.

So please, present to me the concrete facts supporting the theory of evolution.

P.S. Don't expect a reply 'till Tuesday.

HipYoungster42

They are the driven by the exact same thing, genetic mutation. If a mutation allows the creature to defend itself better or be more fertile in the child birthing stage of life that creature will more than likely end up having more offspring than a creature who doesn't have those mutations. If enough mutations build up over time the creature becoems a new species. You want examples of this? Ok. Species are different when they can't produce viable offspring. There are creatures alive today where one form of a species and a mutated form of a species can produce offspring. The next mutated form of a species can produce offspring with the two previous forms. The next form of species can produce offspring with all previous forms. However the last form of species can't produce offspring with the first species form but can produce offspring with the middle forms. This is how a species speciates. It isn't a cow giving birth to a dog sort of thing. IT's a long drawn out process. This is caleld Ring Species and examples of this are Greenish Warbler, Ensatina Salamanders, Larus Gulls and a few others. Hewre are some pictures to show you what I mean...

Avatar image for SpartanNapoleon
SpartanNapoleon

214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#682 SpartanNapoleon
Member since 2009 • 214 Posts

[QUOTE="SpartanNapoleon"][QUOTE="BumFluff122"]Consciousness isn't a physical thing. It is a word used to describe physical things.

BumFluff122

It may not be physical but its the basis of everything we do its always experienced and its known as the only reason why we experienced everything. Its basically our life as we know it. And even thought we know its true we can never prove it by any means. So if there is just one thing that cannot be proven ever and still be known to be absolutly true then you don't think that there is many more things that we will never be able to prove and they can still be true. Its important to recognize that we are limited in our understanding and the truth we know is just a subset of the total truth that we may not even be aware is possible.

I'm aware that we know very little about the universe. However merely because we know very little about the universe does not mean God exists. What makes you think conciousness, or that which gives us conciousness, isn't material? Consciousness is basically merely the ability to perceieve. All animals and life are conscious to some degree due to synaptic firing in our brains.

Good lets assume that consciousness comes from matter. Then the odds that you are conscious are gathered when you put all the matter of conscious beings divided by the total matter in the universe. The odds of you being conscious whatever you want to put on here as your estimation of total mass of conscious beings divided by 3 × 10^52. No matter what realistic estimates you give the chances of you being consciously alive by random luck are close to 1/infinity which is zero.

Avatar image for HipYoungster42
HipYoungster42

1892

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#683 HipYoungster42
Member since 2009 • 1892 Posts

This should do.

Got_to_go

Dang, that's a long list. I'll get back to you on that when I've read through most of it.

[QUOTE="HipYoungster42"]

Oh, by the way, when I said to show me the facts supporting evolution, I was talking about evolution like going from one species to another. I definitely believe in adaptations and whatnot, but evolution from one species to another? Nuh-uh.

So please, present to me the concrete facts supporting the theory of evolution.

P.S. Don't expect a reply 'till Tuesday.

snowman6251

You don't believe in evolution. God damn it.

lol What's so weird about that?:P

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#684 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

Good lets assume that consciousness comes from matter. Then the odds that you are conscious are gathered when you put all the matter of conscious beings divided by the total matter in the universe. The odds of you being conscious whatever you want to put on here as your estimation of total mass of conscious beings divided by 3 × 10^52. No matter what realistic estimates you give the chances of you being consciously alive by random luck are close to 1/infinity which is zero.

SpartanNapoleon

There are many many MANY other variables at work than just "Take all the matters in the universe and devide it by concious matter". You aren't taking into account the chemical composition of the atmosphere where this organic matter originated, you aren't taking into account the type of energy that are released in that chemical environment and how it may assist the origin of that organic matter, etc... You cant just take all the matter in the universe and devide it by a number to get a result where that result is only possible in certain instances. Instead how about taking that chemical composition of Earth and similar chemical composition of other planets and then devide the probability that life will exist on each of those planets. The only planet we know of with a similar compoisition to earth is earth. Therefor if we devide that nunmber, 1, by the number of planets capable of supporting life, 1, we get 1 or 100%.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#685 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Natural evolution, since there is no evidence of a divine existance.
Avatar image for ChidoriBoyU
ChidoriBoyU

392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#686 ChidoriBoyU
Member since 2009 • 392 Posts

I don't believe in God because there's no evidence of god, quite simple really. The question should be how come people believe in god with no evidence.

Brainkiller05

dude how come there's no evidence

let's talk logic

if you were walking in a desert and you see foot prints of a human then you'll take that as an EVIDENCE that a human was walking this way

and if you look at a tree and you see a bird's nest then you'll know that a bird lives here

so just thinking about all this perfection in creation in this world doesn't make you believe that there's a God that created the sky the planets the moon the stars the animals trees humans everything i mean it's not logical not to believe, and if there was no God then how did this world come to existence i want you or any athiest to answer me on that

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#687 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

dude how come there's no evidence

let's talk logic

if you were walking in a desert and you see foot prints of a human then you'll take that as an EVIDENCE that a human was walking this way

and if you look at a tree and you see a bird's nest then you'll know that a bird lives here

so just thinking about all this perfection in creation in this world doesn't make you believe that there's a God that created the sky the planets the moon the stars the animals trees humans everything i mean it's not logical not to believe, and if there was no God then how did this world come to existence i want you or any athiest to answer me on that

ChidoriBoyU

The difference between your analogy and the evidence for God is that we know one exists and we don't knwo another exists. We have seen humans, we have seen their footprints, Every footprint left by a human is evidence for those footprints that are humanlike to have been left by a human. There is only one universe we are aware of, if there is a God there is only 1 creation we are aware of. Placing your belief that everything came into existence by thie miraculous being when there is absolutely 0 evidence that a being has ever created a universe before is crazy. The footprint made by the human and the nest made by the bird are examples of things that occur time and time again. The creation of the universe can not be tested and the tester can't be verified. The universe is also not perfect, please explain to me how it is perfect. Since there is only one universe that we know of how do you measure this perfection against a universe that is imperfect?

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#688 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
People psychological feelings when they believe in God and how it lifts their spirits is not evidence for God. It is evidence that a belief in something can bring warmth into their lives. Many beliefs do that, not just the belief in God. So you are trying to say that not only do we have the five sense commonly known to all men but we have a 6th weird sense that allows us to believe in a God? Ok. You have to understand man is not driven to believe in a God. What he is driven for is knwoledge of the world around him. As soon as we are out of our mothers womb and have our eyes wide open to the world we begin taking in sensory perception and we begin tryign to learn more about the world around us. It has nothing to do with God. You're trying to claim and thought evidence for something else is evidence for there beign a God.BumFluff122
Actually, it most certainly can be evidence for god. It is no less evidence than when you look at something and perceive it to be so. You are confiding a psyhcological feeling within a sensory perception in every last belief there is. There is absolutely no rational reason to doubt the religious perception more so than regular sensory perceptions. If someone gets the irrevocable feeling that there is god when X happens, that is JUST as inductively valid as the scientist observing a phenomenon.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#689 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Because we have found other solar systems through out our galaxy alone.... We have found far less active areas than ours as well.. Our positioning in the Galaxy and such is nothing new what so ever.. sSubZerOo
And how do you know that less active is better? You, oh limited being who does not have a complete grasp of the universe, how do you know those places are objectively better?
Avatar image for ChidoriBoyU
ChidoriBoyU

392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#690 ChidoriBoyU
Member since 2009 • 392 Posts

[QUOTE="ChidoriBoyU"]

dude how come there's no evidence

let's talk logic

if you were walking in a desert and you see foot prints of a human then you'll take that as an EVIDENCE that a human was walking this way

and if you look at a tree and you see a bird's nest then you'll know that a bird lives here

so just thinking about all this perfection in creation in this world doesn't make you believe that there's a God that created the sky the planets the moon the stars the animals trees humans everything i mean it's not logical not to believe, and if there was no God then how did this world come to existence i want you or any athiest to answer me on that

BumFluff122

please explain to me how it is perfect. Since there is only one universe that we know of how do you measure this perfection against a universe that is imperfect?

by "perfect" i mean perfectly designed perfectly made,for example has the night ever come before the day once?,has a planet moved from it's radial path around the sun for once?,i mean they all follow laws of nature,look at the connection between animals and plants,the food chains are so organized,what i'm trying to say just how every country has laws this universe has natural laws and laws don't come or appear by themselves someone puts these laws,so i believe natural laws are put by someone that is greater than nature itself in other words the creator of nature and that means God,i believe we humans are the ones who destroyed this world for our selfish matters,but that DOESN'T mean this world or God are imperfect,we-humans-are the ones imperfect,you get what i mean yeah?

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#691 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]People psychological feelings when they believe in God and how it lifts their spirits is not evidence for God. It is evidence that a belief in something can bring warmth into their lives. Many beliefs do that, not just the belief in God. So you are trying to say that not only do we have the five sense commonly known to all men but we have a 6th weird sense that allows us to believe in a God? Ok. You have to understand man is not driven to believe in a God. What he is driven for is knwoledge of the world around him. As soon as we are out of our mothers womb and have our eyes wide open to the world we begin taking in sensory perception and we begin tryign to learn more about the world around us. It has nothing to do with God. You're trying to claim and thought evidence for something else is evidence for there beign a God.Vandalvideo
Actually, it most certainly can be evidence for god. It is no less evidence than when you look at something and perceive it to be so. You are confiding a psyhcological feeling within a sensory perception in every last belief there is. There is absolutely no rational reason to doubt the religious perception more so than regular sensory perceptions. If someone gets the irrevocable feeling that there is god when X happens, that is JUST as inductively valid as the scientist observing a phenomenon.

It's not evidence for much of anythign if it has some other explanation. And it does. A much better one actually. You seem ot be statign things as if they are facts. We do not have an innate belief in God. what we do have as innate curiousity of the world around us. You are reading far FAR too much into it. An innate curiousity does not equal evidence or proof of God. So what you are attempting to say is that beliefs are pretty much equal to sensory perceptions. That's laughable.

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#692 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

Well as far as I can tell consciously I am not an atheist, but what to me is a compelling argument for atheism is that many facets and causes of religion and things related to the supernatural can be nowadays explained through psychology. sociology etc, thus taking away the veil of mystery that covered them and consequently draining away most (if not all) of their proof-value.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#693 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="ChidoriBoyU"]

dude how come there's no evidence

let's talk logic

if you were walking in a desert and you see foot prints of a human then you'll take that as an EVIDENCE that a human was walking this way

and if you look at a tree and you see a bird's nest then you'll know that a bird lives here

so just thinking about all this perfection in creation in this world doesn't make you believe that there's a God that created the sky the planets the moon the stars the animals trees humans everything i mean it's not logical not to believe, and if there was no God then how did this world come to existence i want you or any athiest to answer me on that

ChidoriBoyU

please explain to me how it is perfect. Since there is only one universe that we know of how do you measure this perfection against a universe that is imperfect?

by "perfect" i mean perfectly designed perfectly made,for example has the night ever come before the day once?,has a planet moved from it's radial path around the sun for once?,i mean they all follow laws of nature,look at the connection between animals and plants,the food chains are so organized,what i'm trying to say just how every country has laws this universe has natural laws and laws don't come or appear by themselves someone puts these laws,so i believe natural laws are put by someone that is greater than nature itself in other words the creator of nature and that means God,i believe we humans are the ones who destroyed this world for our selfish matters,but that DOESN'T mean this world or God are imperfect,we-humans-are the ones imperfect,you get what i mean yeah?

the night comes before the day every 24 hours. Planets cna get pulled away from their path by a passing star. They all follow laws of nature as does the star pulling the planet from it's path. How exactly do you know what these physical laws consist of? Or how they came to be? If God were perfect his creations would be perfect. It would be impossible for him to create anything that is imperfect.

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#694 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="BumFluff122"]People psychological feelings when they believe in God and how it lifts their spirits is not evidence for God. It is evidence that a belief in something can bring warmth into their lives. Many beliefs do that, not just the belief in God. So you are trying to say that not only do we have the five sense commonly known to all men but we have a 6th weird sense that allows us to believe in a God? Ok. You have to understand man is not driven to believe in a God. What he is driven for is knwoledge of the world around him. As soon as we are out of our mothers womb and have our eyes wide open to the world we begin taking in sensory perception and we begin tryign to learn more about the world around us. It has nothing to do with God. You're trying to claim and thought evidence for something else is evidence for there beign a God.BumFluff122

Actually, it most certainly can be evidence for god. It is no less evidence than when you look at something and perceive it to be so. You are confiding a psyhcological feeling within a sensory perception in every last belief there is. There is absolutely no rational reason to doubt the religious perception more so than regular sensory perceptions. If someone gets the irrevocable feeling that there is god when X happens, that is JUST as inductively valid as the scientist observing a phenomenon.

It's not evidence for much of anythign if it has some other explanation. And it does. A much better one actually. You seem ot be statign things as if they are facts. We do not have an innate belief in God. what we do have as innate curiousity of the world around us. You are reading far FAR too much into it. An innate curiousity does not equal evidence or proof of God. So what you are attempting to say is that beliefs are pretty much equal to sensory perceptions. That's laughable.

I really hope the response to this doesnt pertain to the dear-to-Vandalvideo matrix theory... >___>

Avatar image for ChidoriBoyU
ChidoriBoyU

392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#695 ChidoriBoyU
Member since 2009 • 392 Posts

[QUOTE="ChidoriBoyU"]

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"] please explain to me how it is perfect. Since there is only one universe that we know of how do you measure this perfection against a universe that is imperfect?

BumFluff122

by "perfect" i mean perfectly designed perfectly made,for example has the night ever come before the day once?,has a planet moved from it's radial path around the sun for once?,i mean they all follow laws of nature,look at the connection between animals and plants,the food chains are so organized,what i'm trying to say just how every country has laws this universe has natural laws and laws don't come or appear by themselves someone puts these laws,so i believe natural laws are put by someone that is greater than nature itself in other words the creator of nature and that means God,i believe we humans are the ones who destroyed this world for our selfish matters,but that DOESN'T mean this world or God are imperfect,we-humans-are the ones imperfect,you get what i mean yeah?

the night comes before the day every 24 hours. Planets cna get pulled away from their path by a passing star. They all follow laws of nature as does the star pulling the planet from it's path. How exactly do you know what these physical laws consist of? Or how they came to be? If God were perfect his creations would be perfect. It would be impossible for him to create anything that is imperfect.

but the day starts from the morning to the night not the opposite and about the planets what you say is true but does it always stay this way? no,and God is perfect and he created us and other creatures ,i believe in that,we are imperfects that's why we seek someone who is perfect and that someone is God
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#696 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="ChidoriBoyU"]

by "perfect" i mean perfectly designed perfectly made,for example has the night ever come before the day once?,has a planet moved from it's radial path around the sun for once?,i mean they all follow laws of nature,look at the connection between animals and plants,the food chains are so organized,what i'm trying to say just how every country has laws this universe has natural laws and laws don't come or appear by themselves someone puts these laws,so i believe natural laws are put by someone that is greater than nature itself in other words the creator of nature and that means God,i believe we humans are the ones who destroyed this world for our selfish matters,but that DOESN'T mean this world or God are imperfect,we-humans-are the ones imperfect,you get what i mean yeah?

ChidoriBoyU

the night comes before the day every 24 hours. Planets cna get pulled away from their path by a passing star. They all follow laws of nature as does the star pulling the planet from it's path. How exactly do you know what these physical laws consist of? Or how they came to be? If God were perfect his creations would be perfect. It would be impossible for him to create anything that is imperfect.

but the day starts from the morning to the night not the opposite and about the planets what you say is true but does it always stay this way? no,and God is perfect and he created us and other creatures ,i believe in that,we are imperfects that's why we seek someone who is perfect and that someone is God

Our supposed imperfection, even if truly an imperfection, does not imply or prove the existance of perfection (a deity). Theoretically perhaps but not in practice.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#697 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

but the day starts from the morning to the night not the opposite and about the planets what you say is true but does it always stay this way? no,and God is perfect and he created us and other creatures ,i believe in that,we are imperfects that's why we seek someone who is perfect and that someone is God ChidoriBoyU
Night comes after day comes after night. This is due to the rotation of the Earth. The only way that our day and night cycle would change on a vaster scale than it is currently changing is if some massive object passed by the Earth and altered it's rotation due to gravity. I have no idea what you are askign when you ask does it always stay this way?

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#698 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="ChidoriBoyU"][QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="ChidoriBoyU"]

by "perfect" i mean perfectly designed perfectly made,for example has the night ever come before the day once?,has a planet moved from it's radial path around the sun for once?,i mean they all follow laws of nature,look at the connection between animals and plants,the food chains are so organized,what i'm trying to say just how every country has laws this universe has natural laws and laws don't come or appear by themselves someone puts these laws,so i believe natural laws are put by someone that is greater than nature itself in other words the creator of nature and that means God,i believe we humans are the ones who destroyed this world for our selfish matters,but that DOESN'T mean this world or God are imperfect,we-humans-are the ones imperfect,you get what i mean yeah?

the night comes before the day every 24 hours. Planets cna get pulled away from their path by a passing star. They all follow laws of nature as does the star pulling the planet from it's path. How exactly do you know what these physical laws consist of? Or how they came to be? If God were perfect his creations would be perfect. It would be impossible for him to create anything that is imperfect.

but the day starts from the morning to the night not the opposite and about the planets what you say is true but does it always stay this way? no,and God is perfect and he created us and other creatures ,i believe in that,we are imperfects that's why we seek someone who is perfect and that someone is God

Why is god always seen as a masculine figure? Why not a woman.. Or a being with no gender role involved what so ever?
Avatar image for ChidoriBoyU
ChidoriBoyU

392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#699 ChidoriBoyU
Member since 2009 • 392 Posts

[QUOTE="ChidoriBoyU"] but the day starts from the morning to the night not the opposite and about the planets what you say is true but does it always stay this way? no,and God is perfect and he created us and other creatures ,i believe in that,we are imperfects that's why we seek someone who is perfect and that someone is God BumFluff122

Night comes after day comes after night. This is due to the rotation of the Earth. The only way that our day and night cycle would change on a vaster scale than it is currently changing is if some massive object passed by the Earth and altered it's rotation due to gravity. I have no idea what you are askign when you ask does it always stay this way?

yes the day-night cycle would change if a massive object passed near the earth and changed i's rotation due to gravity but does it happen?no

and about my previous question

you said that a palnet radial path would change by a passing star but i believe if this happened then that planet would return to it's path due to the continuos gravity of the sun

Avatar image for deactivated-5d3f5f1ece8fb
deactivated-5d3f5f1ece8fb

865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#700 deactivated-5d3f5f1ece8fb
Member since 2004 • 865 Posts

[QUOTE="ChidoriBoyU"][QUOTE="BumFluff122"]the night comes before the day every 24 hours. Planets cna get pulled away from their path by a passing star. They all follow laws of nature as does the star pulling the planet from it's path. How exactly do you know what these physical laws consist of? Or how they came to be? If God were perfect his creations would be perfect. It would be impossible for him to create anything that is imperfect.

sSubZerOo

but the day starts from the morning to the night not the opposite and about the planets what you say is true but does it always stay this way? no,and God is perfect and he created us and other creatures ,i believe in that,we are imperfects that's why we seek someone who is perfect and that someone is God

Why is god always seen as a masculine figure? Why not a woman.. Or a being with no gender role involved what so ever?

He is sexless, but for human understanding we have labeled him...er it.

Couple parables are a Hen(God) and her chicks, and a shepherd(God) and his lambs. So, God can be female or male, but really is sexless.