So Atheists, What's Your Rationale In Your Belief Of No God?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Gallion-Beast
Gallion-Beast

35803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Gallion-Beast
Member since 2005 • 35803 Posts
[QUOTE="Gallion-Beast"][QUOTE="KungfuKitten"] To be fair it sounds like something we made up. The question isn't whether it exists, but whether that take on reality is more probable to be true than there being a God. The scientific method isn't that easy to defend.KungfuKitten
Denying the existence of logical conclusions doesn't make science hard to defend, it makes you deluded.

Ow please You are twisting my every word. Some people say 'i don't believe in God because of lack of evidence.' I say 'The idea of empirical evidence is as hard to defend as the idea of God.' I never meant that i didn't believe that science existed. Stop twisting my words it was very clear what i meant.

I'm not twisting anything. "Is there evidence for science? I don't think so." Even if you were trying to say that you believe in science despite what you think is a lack of evidence, you were still wrong about there being no evidence. Evidence can be observed. That's why law is based on it as opposed to a judge saying "I have faith that this man is guilty". Evidence can be observed, god cannot. Denying evidence is denying reason and without reasoning there is no discussion. It's the equivalent to a boxer who doesn't believe violence exists and cannot himself use it. It doesn't make him hard to beat, it just means he's making no actual attempt at participating beyond being there.
Avatar image for oh_boss
oh_boss

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 oh_boss
Member since 2009 • 227 Posts
[QUOTE="gubrushadow"]yes it has been here , but the question is how did it come ??super_mario_128
Perhaps it is infinite?

I thought the universe was finite. D:
Avatar image for RearNakedChoke
RearNakedChoke

1699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 RearNakedChoke
Member since 2009 • 1699 Posts

[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="gubrushadow"] define magic ?? and were did it come from ?? who did it ??gubrushadow
So you'll happily believe a magical being came into existence from nothing and created everything but you wont believe the universe is capable of doing "magic" stuff such as coming into existence from nothing? Your level of thinking is so primitive it's pointless debating, you're just going to keep asking "well then who created the stuff that made the universe come into existence" it doesn't work like that, you know that.

*sigh* yes i would cuz everything has an origin , the only thing that wont let you beleive in GOD is lucifer , anyway think what you want , its your choice not mine

You must have meant to say that everything has an origin except god. He's exempt.

Avatar image for gubrushadow
gubrushadow

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 gubrushadow
Member since 2009 • 2735 Posts

[QUOTE="gubrushadow"][QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"] Maybe it's all just been here.JML897

yes it has been here , but the question is how did it come ??

How did God come into existence then? Surely something had to create him right?

something is beyond the understanding of man , like can you imagine to live forever ?? but the truth only lay when we die , so lets end the conv and see what happens then
Avatar image for Brainkiller05
Brainkiller05

28954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Brainkiller05
Member since 2005 • 28954 Posts
[QUOTE="oh_boss"][QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="gubrushadow"] define magic ?? and were did it come from ?? who did it ??

So you'll happily believe a magical being came into existence from nothing and created everything but you wont believe the universe is capable of doing "magic" stuff such as coming into existence from nothing? Your level of thinking is so primitive it's pointless debating, you're just going to keep asking "well then who created the stuff that made the universe come into existence" it doesn't work like that, you know that.

Dude, Religion isn't math. You can't take it literally, like you do.

because religious people do you can't say the part were every species got on a boat and survived a flood was metaphorical and then turn around and say "oh but the part were the guy walked on water and came back from the dead was real"
Avatar image for Brainkiller05
Brainkiller05

28954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Brainkiller05
Member since 2005 • 28954 Posts
[QUOTE="JML897"]

[QUOTE="gubrushadow"] yes it has been here , but the question is how did it come ??gubrushadow

How did God come into existence then? Surely something had to create him right?

something is beyond the understanding of man , like can you imagine to live forever ?? but the truth only lay when we die , so lets end the conv and see what happens then

yes, it's beyond the understanding of man so lets all say it was some magical being that created everything :) :oops:
Avatar image for gubrushadow
gubrushadow

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 gubrushadow
Member since 2009 • 2735 Posts
[QUOTE="super_mario_128"][QUOTE="gubrushadow"]yes it has been here , but the question is how did it come ??oh_boss
Perhaps it is infinite?

I thought the universe was finite. D:

i really dont understand you , do you believe in GOD or not ??
Avatar image for oh_boss
oh_boss

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 oh_boss
Member since 2009 • 227 Posts
[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="oh_boss"][QUOTE="Brainkiller05"] So you'll happily believe a magical being came into existence from nothing and created everything but you wont believe the universe is capable of doing "magic" stuff such as coming into existence from nothing? Your level of thinking is so primitive it's pointless debating, you're just going to keep asking "well then who created the stuff that made the universe come into existence" it doesn't work like that, you know that.

Dude, Religion isn't math. You can't take it literally, like you do.

because religious people do you can't say the part were every species got on a boat and survived a flood was metaphorical and then turn around and say "oh but the part were the guy walked on water and came back from the dead was real"

Nobody takes it literal. Only wanna-be christians who go to the church every sunday.
Avatar image for oh_boss
oh_boss

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 oh_boss
Member since 2009 • 227 Posts
[QUOTE="gubrushadow"][QUOTE="oh_boss"][QUOTE="super_mario_128"] Perhaps it is infinite?

I thought the universe was finite. D:

i really dont understand you , do you believe in GOD or not ??

I don't know. Which god are you talking about?
Avatar image for RearNakedChoke
RearNakedChoke

1699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 RearNakedChoke
Member since 2009 • 1699 Posts

[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="oh_boss"] Dude, Religion isn't math. You can't take it literally, like you do.oh_boss
because religious people do you can't say the part were every species got on a boat and survived a flood was metaphorical and then turn around and say "oh but the part were the guy walked on water and came back from the dead was real"

Nobody takes it literal. Only wanna-be christians who go to the church every sunday.

Nobody takes it literally because it's no longer convenient. There's probably a pretty good chance that much of it (or perhaps even all of it) was taken literally 2000 years ago.

I can't remember the last time I saw a Christian stone an adulterer, divorcee, or homosexual. It's just not socially acceptable anymore.

Avatar image for gubrushadow
gubrushadow

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 gubrushadow
Member since 2009 • 2735 Posts

[QUOTE="gubrushadow"][QUOTE="JML897"]

How did God come into existence then? Surely something had to create him right?

Brainkiller05

something is beyond the understanding of man , like can you imagine to live forever ?? but the truth only lay when we die , so lets end the conv and see what happens then

yes, it's beyond the understanding of man so lets all say it was some magical being that created everything :) :oops:

everybody has his own believes , each one must respect the other i think

Avatar image for oh_boss
oh_boss

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 oh_boss
Member since 2009 • 227 Posts

[QUOTE="oh_boss"][QUOTE="Brainkiller05"] because religious people do you can't say the part were every species got on a boat and survived a flood was metaphorical and then turn around and say "oh but the part were the guy walked on water and came back from the dead was real" RearNakedChoke

Nobody takes it literal. Only wanna-be christians who go to the church every sunday.

Nobody takes it literally because it's no longer convenient. There's probably a pretty good chance that much of it (or perhaps even all of it) was taken literally 2000 years ago.

I can't remember the last time I saw a Christian stone an adulterer, divorcee, or homosexual. It's just not socially acceptable anymore.

Religion advances with society and gets restricted by it the same way.

Edit.

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#63 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"][QUOTE="Gallion-Beast"] Denying the existence of logical conclusions doesn't make science hard to defend, it makes you deluded.Gallion-Beast
Ow please You are twisting my every word. Some people say 'i don't believe in God because of lack of evidence.' I say 'The idea of empirical evidence is as hard to defend as the idea of God.' I never meant that i didn't believe that science existed. Stop twisting my words it was very clear what i meant.

I'm not twisting anything. "Is there evidence for science? I don't think so." Even if you were trying to say that you believe in science despite what you think is a lack of evidence, you were still wrong about there being no evidence. Evidence can be observed. That's why law is based on it as opposed to a judge saying "I have faith that this man is guilty". Evidence can be observed, god cannot. Denying evidence is denying reason and without reasoning there is no discussion. It's the equivalent to a boxer who doesn't believe violence exists and cannot himself use it. It doesn't make him hard to beat, it just means he's making no actual attempt at participating beyond being there.

There is very little grounds for the beliefs that science is based on. Like the idea of a world outside of our minds. The most logical take on the world would be to accept the experience as it is, and not to make all kinds of wild assumptions of there being things that we don't see.

Avatar image for FamiBox
FamiBox

5481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 FamiBox
Member since 2007 • 5481 Posts

[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="gubrushadow"] something is beyond the understanding of man , like can you imagine to live forever ?? but the truth only lay when we die , so lets end the conv and see what happens then gubrushadow

yes, it's beyond the understanding of man so lets all say it was some magical being that created everything :) :oops:

everybody has his own believes , each one must respect the other i think

I own respect what is logical and backed up by evidence.

Avatar image for gubrushadow
gubrushadow

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 gubrushadow
Member since 2009 • 2735 Posts
[QUOTE="oh_boss"][QUOTE="gubrushadow"][QUOTE="oh_boss"] I thought the universe was finite. D:

i really dont understand you , do you believe in GOD or not ??

I don't know. Which god are you talking about?

what do you mean what GOD ?? there is only one , the one who created everything , that one , got another ??
Avatar image for RearNakedChoke
RearNakedChoke

1699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 RearNakedChoke
Member since 2009 • 1699 Posts

[QUOTE="RearNakedChoke"]

[QUOTE="oh_boss"] Nobody takes it literal. Only wanna-be christians who go to the church every sunday.oh_boss

Nobody takes it literally because it's no longer convenient. There's probably a pretty good chance that much of it (or perhaps even all of it) was taken literally 2000 years ago.

I can't remember the last time I saw a Christian stone an adulterer, divorcee, or homosexual. It's just not socially acceptable anymore.

Religion advances with society and gets restricted by it the same way.

Edit.

Sure, but I thought the bible was the holy word of god? Nowadays people just pick and choose what to follow, what not to follow, what should be taken literally, and what shouldn't.

Avatar image for oh_boss
oh_boss

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 oh_boss
Member since 2009 • 227 Posts

[QUOTE="gubrushadow"]

[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"] yes, it's beyond the understanding of man so lets all say it was some magical being that created everything :) :oops: FamiBox

everybody has his own believes , each one must respect the other i think

I own respect what is logical and backed up by evidence.

Can you show me evidence that art exists?
Avatar image for oh_boss
oh_boss

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 oh_boss
Member since 2009 • 227 Posts
[QUOTE="gubrushadow"][QUOTE="oh_boss"][QUOTE="gubrushadow"] i really dont understand you , do you believe in GOD or not ??

I don't know. Which god are you talking about?

what do you mean what GOD ?? there is only one , the one who created everything , that one , got another ??

That isn't the god of christianity at least. You've been misinformed.
Avatar image for oh_boss
oh_boss

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 oh_boss
Member since 2009 • 227 Posts

[QUOTE="oh_boss"]

[QUOTE="RearNakedChoke"]

Nobody takes it literally because it's no longer convenient. There's probably a pretty good chance that much of it (or perhaps even all of it) was taken literally 2000 years ago.

I can't remember the last time I saw a Christian stone an adulterer, divorcee, or homosexual. It's just not socially acceptable anymore.

RearNakedChoke

Religion advances with society and gets restricted by it the same way.

Edit.

Sure, but I thought the bible was the holy word of god? Nowadays people just pick and choose what to follow, what not to follow, what should be taken literally, and what shouldn't.

That always happened.
Avatar image for gubrushadow
gubrushadow

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 gubrushadow
Member since 2009 • 2735 Posts
[QUOTE="oh_boss"][QUOTE="gubrushadow"][QUOTE="oh_boss"] I don't know. Which god are you talking about?

what do you mean what GOD ?? there is only one , the one who created everything , that one , got another ??

That isn't the god of christianity at least. You've been misinformed.

well what do you in christianity believe ??
Avatar image for oh_boss
oh_boss

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 oh_boss
Member since 2009 • 227 Posts

There is absolutely no evidence for the existence of God, and to believe in him is just as foolish and ridiculous as believing in unicorns or magical dwarves that live in outer space.

bangell99
It's not the same. The notion of god is much deeper if you think outside of the box.
Avatar image for FamiBox
FamiBox

5481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 FamiBox
Member since 2007 • 5481 Posts

[QUOTE="FamiBox"]

[QUOTE="gubrushadow"]

everybody has his own believes , each one must respect the other i think

oh_boss

I own respect what is logical and backed up by evidence.

Can you show me evidence that art exists?

Sure. Go to a gallery.

Avatar image for Ed_Cetera
Ed_Cetera

373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Ed_Cetera
Member since 2009 • 373 Posts
[QUOTE="gubrushadow"][QUOTE="oh_boss"][QUOTE="gubrushadow"] i really dont understand you , do you believe in GOD or not ??

I don't know. Which god are you talking about?

what do you mean what GOD ?? there is only one , the one who created everything , that one , got another ??

There are plenty of gods, what do you think the other religions were based on?
Avatar image for STAR_Admiral
STAR_Admiral

1119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 STAR_Admiral
Member since 2006 • 1119 Posts

There is absolutely no evidence for the existence of God, and to believe in him is just as foolish and ridiculous as believing in unicorns or magical dwarves that live in outer space.

bangell99
what there are dwarves in outer space being attacked by unicorns! lets save them
Avatar image for gubrushadow
gubrushadow

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 gubrushadow
Member since 2009 • 2735 Posts

[QUOTE="gubrushadow"]

[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"] yes, it's beyond the understanding of man so lets all say it was some magical being that created everything :) :oops: FamiBox

everybody has his own believes , each one must respect the other i think

I own respect what is logical and backed up by evidence.

can you give me the evidence that this universe came all out bu itself ?? and hoe did the human been here on earth , is it a coincidence that the human was on earth the suitable planet of life ?? why wasn't he on mars for example ??
Avatar image for gubrushadow
gubrushadow

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 gubrushadow
Member since 2009 • 2735 Posts
[QUOTE="Ed_Cetera"][QUOTE="gubrushadow"][QUOTE="oh_boss"] I don't know. Which god are you talking about?

what do you mean what GOD ?? there is only one , the one who created everything , that one , got another ??

There are plenty of gods, what do you think the other religions were based on?

i belive in the existance of demons , but dont believe in the existance of plenty of gods
Avatar image for STAR_Admiral
STAR_Admiral

1119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 STAR_Admiral
Member since 2006 • 1119 Posts
To be serious If i told you there was a a pot of gold for you in Hawaii, would you just fly there and spend money because i said so? You would want some sort of verification before spending money on a flight. To devote your life to spending hours per day praying, in church, etc doing stuff because some book told you to, and not doing stuff because the same book told you not to... without any verificatio at all... well... sounds quite foolish
Avatar image for JML897
JML897

33134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 JML897
Member since 2004 • 33134 Posts

is it a coincidence that the human was on earth the suitable planet of life ?? why wasn't he on mars for example ??gubrushadow

It's not a coincidence at all...life is on earth because earth is the only planet we know of that can support life. If Mars was able to support life, there would be life there too.

Avatar image for btaylor2404
btaylor2404

11353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#80 btaylor2404
Member since 2003 • 11353 Posts

Utter lack of evidence, there are lots of myths but no hard evidence. And the fact that the three major religions take a whole lot of their plot/storylines from previous religions, as did they just adds to the doubt. Just because 90% or 99% of a room of 10 believes something doesn't mean I have to, same goes for the world.

Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#81 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
oh yeah thats rite , this giant universe , the humans , everything , oh yeah it all came by itself , no one created them ! come on people the evidence is one thing , everything is an evidence , just because we are so intelligenty we reached the moon ?? you want a scientific evidence , then can anybody explain were did this universe come from ?? if your answer is the BIG BANG or the atoms , well from were did they come from ??gubrushadow
The universe created itself, yes. Why is that more unrealistic than a celestial being creating it? As for humans, animals, plants, etc., that's all because of evolution. I think that's a more sensible suggestion than things just appearing out of nowhere because God said so.
Avatar image for deactivated-60678a6f9e4d4
deactivated-60678a6f9e4d4

10077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#82 deactivated-60678a6f9e4d4
Member since 2007 • 10077 Posts

[QUOTE="bangell99"]

There is absolutely no evidence for the existence of God, and to believe in him is just as foolish and ridiculous as believing in unicorns or magical dwarves that live in outer space.

STAR_Admiral

what there are dwarves in outer space being attacked by unicorns! lets save them

To the spaceships!

Avatar image for deactivated-60678a6f9e4d4
deactivated-60678a6f9e4d4

10077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#83 deactivated-60678a6f9e4d4
Member since 2007 • 10077 Posts

[QUOTE="bangell99"]

There is absolutely no evidence for the existence of God, and to believe in him is just as foolish and ridiculous as believing in unicorns or magical dwarves that live in outer space.

oh_boss

It's not the same. The notion of god is much deeper if you think outside of the box.

It's certainly more complex and meaningful, but no less ridiculous to believe in.

Avatar image for Gallion-Beast
Gallion-Beast

35803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Gallion-Beast
Member since 2005 • 35803 Posts

[QUOTE="Gallion-Beast"][QUOTE="KungfuKitten"] Ow please You are twisting my every word. Some people say 'i don't believe in God because of lack of evidence.' I say 'The idea of empirical evidence is as hard to defend as the idea of God.' I never meant that i didn't believe that science existed. Stop twisting my words it was very clear what i meant.KungfuKitten

I'm not twisting anything. "Is there evidence for science? I don't think so." Even if you were trying to say that you believe in science despite what you think is a lack of evidence, you were still wrong about there being no evidence. Evidence can be observed. That's why law is based on it as opposed to a judge saying "I have faith that this man is guilty". Evidence can be observed, god cannot. Denying evidence is denying reason and without reasoning there is no discussion. It's the equivalent to a boxer who doesn't believe violence exists and cannot himself use it. It doesn't make him hard to beat, it just means he's making no actual attempt at participating beyond being there.

There is very little grounds for the beliefs that science is based on. Like the idea of a world outside of our minds. The most logical take on the world would be to accept the experience as it is, and not to make all kinds of wild assumptions of there being things that we don't see.

The world existing is something I believe in because it's consistent (implying it's not the same as a dream) and again, complete lack of evidence that it doesn't. Science isn't based on beliefs, it's based on evidence. When there is something we do not know, people will sometimes invent theories, and then attempt to prove whether they are true or false, but they are never taken to be true before they are proved. Making all kinds of wild assumptions of there being things that we don't see is exactly the opposite of science. (In fact it's commonly known as religion) If you have little education of the subject of science you might not realise that everything accepted as scientific fact can be proven and is not a wild assumption, but not understanding it doesn't mean it's not based on reason.
Avatar image for gubrushadow
gubrushadow

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 gubrushadow
Member since 2009 • 2735 Posts

[QUOTE="gubrushadow"]is it a coincidence that the human was on earth the suitable planet of life ?? why wasn't he on mars for example ??JML897

It's not a coincidence at all...life is on earth because earth is the only planet we know of that can support life. If Mars was able to support life, there would be life there too.

that makes no sense , who are the original parents of us al ?? who told them how to have kids ?? how did they communicate ?? these questions need answers , its only supported in the holy books
Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#86 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
[QUOTE="JML897"]

[QUOTE="gubrushadow"]is it a coincidence that the human was on earth the suitable planet of life ?? why wasn't he on mars for example ??gubrushadow

It's not a coincidence at all...life is on earth because earth is the only planet we know of that can support life. If Mars was able to support life, there would be life there too.

that makes no sense , who are the original parents of us al ?? who told them how to have kids ?? how did they communicate ?? these questions need answers , its only supported in the holy books

It makes perfect sense. We're on Earth because Earth is suitable. Not the other way around. I think animals/humans can work out for themselves how to have kids. And communication develops over time, as do specific languages. If we were able to develop over thousands of years in intelligence, lifespan, and technology, why couldn't we have developed our own languages? Why can't human existence develop gradually? Why does it all have to be created by God?
Avatar image for JML897
JML897

33134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 JML897
Member since 2004 • 33134 Posts

[QUOTE="JML897"]

[QUOTE="gubrushadow"]is it a coincidence that the human was on earth the suitable planet of life ?? why wasn't he on mars for example ??gubrushadow

It's not a coincidence at all...life is on earth because earth is the only planet we know of that can support life. If Mars was able to support life, there would be life there too.

that makes no sense , who are the original parents of us al ??

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

I'd suggest reading that.

Avatar image for Brainkiller05
Brainkiller05

28954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Brainkiller05
Member since 2005 • 28954 Posts
[QUOTE="JML897"]

[QUOTE="gubrushadow"]is it a coincidence that the human was on earth the suitable planet of life ?? why wasn't he on mars for example ??gubrushadow

It's not a coincidence at all...life is on earth because earth is the only planet we know of that can support life. If Mars was able to support life, there would be life there too.

that makes no sense , who are the original parents of us al ?? who told them how to have kids ?? how did they communicate ?? these questions need answers , its only supported in the holy books

Ok, I'm done with this debate. You can believe Religion all you want, but don't ignore science because you're scared it might make you consider that your religion is false.
Avatar image for STAR_Admiral
STAR_Admiral

1119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 STAR_Admiral
Member since 2006 • 1119 Posts
[QUOTE="gubrushadow"][QUOTE="JML897"]

is it a coincidence that the human was on earth the suitable planet of life ?? why wasn't he on mars for example ??gubrushadow

It's not a coincidence at all...life is on earth because earth is the only planet we know of that can support life. If Mars was able to support life, there would be life there too.

that makes no sense , who are the original parents of us al ?? who told them how to have kids ?? how did they communicate ?? these questions need answers , its only supported in the holy books

err ever heard of evolution? All cells come from preexisting cells, except for the first cells. The first cells were most likely generated from organic matter (abiogenesis), although not proven but has the most evidence so far. Who told them to have kids? No one needs to tell an organism to have kids. Reproduction is an innate aspect of all life. The question of communication has pretty well been answered. Language too evolves over time and becomes more complex as the complexity of the organism increases. While other animals communicate with mere sounds which mean "danger" or food" we humans have a complex language.
Avatar image for HipYoungster42
HipYoungster42

1892

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 HipYoungster42
Member since 2009 • 1892 Posts

So basically, most of you don't believe in God because either a)-there's no evidence or b)-because it just seems like a stupid idea.

M'kay, I see.

Avatar image for gubrushadow
gubrushadow

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 gubrushadow
Member since 2009 • 2735 Posts

[QUOTE="gubrushadow"][QUOTE="JML897"]

It's not a coincidence at all...life is on earth because earth is the only planet we know of that can support life. If Mars was able to support life, there would be life there too.

Bourbons3

that makes no sense , who are the original parents of us al ?? who told them how to have kids ?? how did they communicate ?? these questions need answers , its only supported in the holy books

It makes perfect sense. We're on Earth because Earth is suitable. Not the other way around. well i dont think you would believe me , but there must be a life after death rite ?? you cant just die and then what ?? black screen ?? everybody has his opinions , and you , me and everynody will know the answer when they die , end convs , because this will lead to nowere I think animals/humans can work out for themselves how to have kids. And communication develops over time, as do specific languages. If we were able to develop over thousands of years in intelligence, lifespan, and technology, why couldn't we have developed our own languages? Why can't human existence develop gradually? Why does it all have to be created by God?

well i dont think after death is the end ?? what black screen ?? there is something after death , my believes is another life , i dunno what you belive , but i dont think this conv will lead to something so i think we have to end it

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#92 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts
[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]

[QUOTE="Gallion-Beast"] I'm not twisting anything. "Is there evidence for science? I don't think so." Even if you were trying to say that you believe in science despite what you think is a lack of evidence, you were still wrong about there being no evidence. Evidence can be observed. That's why law is based on it as opposed to a judge saying "I have faith that this man is guilty". Evidence can be observed, god cannot. Denying evidence is denying reason and without reasoning there is no discussion. It's the equivalent to a boxer who doesn't believe violence exists and cannot himself use it. It doesn't make him hard to beat, it just means he's making no actual attempt at participating beyond being there.Gallion-Beast

There is very little grounds for the beliefs that science is based on. Like the idea of a world outside of our minds. The most logical take on the world would be to accept the experience as it is, and not to make all kinds of wild assumptions of there being things that we don't see.

The world existing is something I believe in because it's consistent (implying it's not the same as a dream) and again, complete lack of evidence that it doesn't. Science isn't based on beliefs, it's based on evidence. When there is something we do not know, people will sometimes invent theories, and then attempt to prove whether they are true or false, but they are never taken to be true before they are proved. Making all kinds of wild assumptions of there being things that we don't see is exactly the opposite of science. (In fact it's commonly known as religion) If you have little education of the subject of science you might not realise that everything accepted as scientific fact can be proven and is not a wild assumption, but not understanding it doesn't mean it's not based on reason.

Are You saying science is based on its own system of validity? That is the same with Christianity and pretty much any belief. With science assuming a world outside of our minds i meant the idea of the experience, the only thing You have to prove or do anything with, being flawed. There is no justification for making the assumption that there is more to this world than the experience itself.
Avatar image for Heretix_Aevum
Heretix_Aevum

4105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 Heretix_Aevum
Member since 2005 • 4105 Posts

The complete lack of any evidence or logical reasoning to back up the existence of a God. The only thing I ever hear is "You can't prove he doesn't exist, therefore he exists". Personally, when it comes to the existance of something, if there is no proof then it does not exist. I don't give the benefit of the doubt to the Tooth Fairy, Santa or the Boogie Man. A God is no different.

Avatar image for gubrushadow
gubrushadow

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 gubrushadow
Member since 2009 • 2735 Posts

So basically, most of you don't believe in God because either a)-there's no evidence or b)-because it just seems like a stupid idea.

M'kay, I see.

HipYoungster42
what about you ??
Avatar image for Brainkiller05
Brainkiller05

28954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 Brainkiller05
Member since 2005 • 28954 Posts

[QUOTE="Bourbons3"][QUOTE="gubrushadow"] that makes no sense , who are the original parents of us al ?? who told them how to have kids ?? how did they communicate ?? these questions need answers , its only supported in the holy booksgubrushadow

It makes perfect sense. We're on Earth because Earth is suitable. Not the other way around. well i dont think you would believe me , but there must be a life after death rite ?? you cant just die and then what ?? black screen ?? everybody has his opinions , and you , me and everynody will know the answer when they die , end convs , because this will lead to nowere I think animals/humans can work out for themselves how to have kids. And communication develops over time, as do specific languages. If we were able to develop over thousands of years in intelligence, lifespan, and technology, why couldn't we have developed our own languages? Why can't human existence develop gradually? Why does it all have to be created by God?

well i dont think after death is the end ?? what black screen ?? there is something after death , my believes is another life , i dunno what you belive , but i dont think this conv will lead to something so i think we have to end it

was it a black screen before you were born? there's your answer.
Avatar image for gubrushadow
gubrushadow

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 gubrushadow
Member since 2009 • 2735 Posts

[QUOTE="gubrushadow"][QUOTE="JML897"]

It's not a coincidence at all...life is on earth because earth is the only planet we know of that can support life. If Mars was able to support life, there would be life there too.

Brainkiller05

that makes no sense , who are the original parents of us al ?? who told them how to have kids ?? how did they communicate ?? these questions need answers , its only supported in the holy books

Ok, I'm done with this debate. You can believe Religion all you want, but don't ignore science because you're scared it might make you consider that your religion is false.

and you say this completely complicated and sharp great science came like this by itself ??

i have to go now talk to you later , check this threaad after some hours

Avatar image for Gallion-Beast
Gallion-Beast

35803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 Gallion-Beast
Member since 2005 • 35803 Posts
[QUOTE="Gallion-Beast"][QUOTE="KungfuKitten"] There is very little grounds for the beliefs that science is based on. Like the idea of a world outside of our minds. The most logical take on the world would be to accept the experience as it is, and not to make all kinds of wild assumptions of there being things that we don't see.KungfuKitten
The world existing is something I believe in because it's consistent (implying it's not the same as a dream) and again, complete lack of evidence that it doesn't. Science isn't based on beliefs, it's based on evidence. When there is something we do not know, people will sometimes invent theories, and then attempt to prove whether they are true or false, but they are never taken to be true before they are proved. Making all kinds of wild assumptions of there being things that we don't see is exactly the opposite of science. (In fact it's commonly known as religion) If you have little education of the subject of science you might not realise that everything accepted as scientific fact can be proven and is not a wild assumption, but not understanding it doesn't mean it's not based on reason.

Are You saying science is based on its own system of validity? That is the same with Christianity and pretty much any belief. With science assuming a world outside of our minds i meant the idea of the experience, the only thing You have to prove or do anything with, being flawed. There is no justification for making the assumption that there is more to this world than the experience itself.

I can't prove there's more, perhaps i really am in The Matrix (or something similar) and none of my senses actually report what's really there. It is however a rather ludicrous suggestion and since all experience points to the world existing, if only as the thing that causes the experience. If nothing else it is logical to assume that the world exists at least while we are interacting with it, because it appears to follow it's own rules.
Avatar image for alexside1
alexside1

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 alexside1
Member since 2006 • 4412 Posts

So basically, most of you don't believe in God because either a)-there's no evidence or b)-because it just seems like a stupid idea.

M'kay, I see.

HipYoungster42
Seems that way eh? Besides are we even allow to do this research stuff? :/
Avatar image for Blu_Falcon37
Blu_Falcon37

4041

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#99 Blu_Falcon37
Member since 2006 • 4041 Posts

There's no evidence to even believe there is a god and to me religion is just a waste of time.

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#100 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"][QUOTE="Gallion-Beast"] The world existing is something I believe in because it's consistent (implying it's not the same as a dream) and again, complete lack of evidence that it doesn't. Science isn't based on beliefs, it's based on evidence. When there is something we do not know, people will sometimes invent theories, and then attempt to prove whether they are true or false, but they are never taken to be true before they are proved. Making all kinds of wild assumptions of there being things that we don't see is exactly the opposite of science. (In fact it's commonly known as religion) If you have little education of the subject of science you might not realise that everything accepted as scientific fact can be proven and is not a wild assumption, but not understanding it doesn't mean it's not based on reason.Gallion-Beast
Are You saying science is based on its own system of validity? That is the same with Christianity and pretty much any belief. With science assuming a world outside of our minds i meant the idea of the experience, the only thing You have to prove or do anything with, being flawed. There is no justification for making the assumption that there is more to this world than the experience itself.

I can't prove there's more, perhaps i really am in The Matrix (or something similar) and none of my senses actually report what's really there. It is however a rather ludicrous suggestion and since all experience points to the world existing, if only as the thing that causes the experience. If nothing else it is logical to assume that the world exists at least while we are interacting with it, because it appears to follow it's own rules.


That is exactly what i'm saying.

I can't prove there is more, or less than the experience. You have the experience and that is all.
I am not involving a Matrix or anything like that. That is somewhat what science does. They say: You have this experience, but it is flawed. There is more to it than what You experience. Somewhere out there is a truth regardless of the experience. And there the idea of proof comes in.
I don't believe that nonsense. To me the experience itself is all i know, and can know of.

You are saying exactly what i meant.