[QUOTE="Gallion-Beast"][QUOTE="KungfuKitten"] To be fair it sounds like something we made up. The question isn't whether it exists, but whether that take on reality is more probable to be true than there being a God. The scientific method isn't that easy to defend.KungfuKittenDenying the existence of logical conclusions doesn't make science hard to defend, it makes you deluded. Ow please You are twisting my every word. Some people say 'i don't believe in God because of lack of evidence.' I say 'The idea of empirical evidence is as hard to defend as the idea of God.' I never meant that i didn't believe that science existed. Stop twisting my words it was very clear what i meant. I'm not twisting anything. "Is there evidence for science? I don't think so." Even if you were trying to say that you believe in science despite what you think is a lack of evidence, you were still wrong about there being no evidence. Evidence can be observed. That's why law is based on it as opposed to a judge saying "I have faith that this man is guilty". Evidence can be observed, god cannot. Denying evidence is denying reason and without reasoning there is no discussion. It's the equivalent to a boxer who doesn't believe violence exists and cannot himself use it. It doesn't make him hard to beat, it just means he's making no actual attempt at participating beyond being there.
Log in to comment