From a very early age it became clear to me that god was to be treated the same way as Santa Clause, the tooth fairy, the easter bunny and ufo's. All fun to believe in, but ultimately nothing morethan fantasy.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]Different types of God's can be disproven. Or rather, different ideas of Gods can be proven false. There is a reason why religion is plastic when looking in the face of scientific evidence that doesn't support their ideas. 1000 years ago it was believed that God created every creature on Earth as it was. Now practically everyone believes in evolution, whether it is what they personally call micro-evolution or not. Times change and beliefs change with them. you believe that atoms come from nowhere , just by themselves , and then by coincidence formed a giant universe with monkeys , then these monkeys learned how to shave their hair off their skin and how to brush their teeth and make electricity , and not believe in GOD that simply created the human with its mind to know all these things ?? plus lets not forget lucifer who would love to see people disbelieve in GOD Are we having a strawman party? I wanna join![QUOTE="Espada12"]
That's true, but unless you can disprove or them prove we are going no where. In death we shall all know!
gubrushadow
No. Basts do exactly the same thing when they fly. Perhaps you are trying to explain one of the current hypothesis that science has advanced. That being that the universe is sort of a spheroid in that if you send a signal in one direction eventually it will hit you in the back of the head. Much as if you threw a plane around the Earth when it came back to you it would hit you in the back of the head again. not everything must be read by its face you know , there is always a hidden message in some words ,[QUOTE="gubrushadow"]let me give an example to those who says of science , in our ancieny holy book , GOD said that : "the universe will give you back what you will send " and if you have made your research you should know that scientists discovered that every signal they send through space returns to them directly , isnt that a simple proof ??BumFluff122
[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]Different types of God's can be disproven. Or rather, different ideas of Gods can be proven false. There is a reason why religion is plastic when looking in the face of scientific evidence that doesn't support their ideas. 1000 years ago it was believed that God created every creature on Earth as it was. Now practically everyone believes in evolution, whether it is what they personally call micro-evolution or not. Times change and beliefs change with them. you believe that atoms come from nowhere , just by themselves , and then by coincidence formed a giant universe with monkeys , then these monkeys learned how to shave their hair off their skin and how to brush their teeth and make electricity , and not believe in GOD that simply created the human with its mind to know all these things ?? plus lets not forget lucifer who would love to see people disbelieve in GOD Everything happens by chance, that is true. Nature is bound to follow its own rules, by that extent that new things are being created all the time as a result.. (evolution etc.) But because things happen by chance, and us humans cannot calculate them, doesn't mean we shouldn't look more into them. I heard that some scientists are making a formula to explain mathematically how the human brain works.[QUOTE="Espada12"]
That's true, but unless you can disprove or them prove we are going no where. In death we shall all know!
gubrushadow
[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]Different types of God's can be disproven. Or rather, different ideas of Gods can be proven false. There is a reason why religion is plastic when looking in the face of scientific evidence that doesn't support their ideas. 1000 years ago it was believed that God created every creature on Earth as it was. Now practically everyone believes in evolution, whether it is what they personally call micro-evolution or not. Times change and beliefs change with them. you believe that atoms come from nowhere , just by themselves , and then by coincidence formed a giant universe with monkeys , then these monkeys learned how to shave their hair off their skin and how to brush their teeth and make electricity , and not believe in GOD that simply created the human with its mind to know all these things ?? plus lets not forget lucifer who would love to see people disbelieve in GODNo. Everything in the universe has a cause. I didn't once said atoms came from nowhere. As for the rest of your statement I woudl again suggest you look up the term evolution because you seem to be severly lacking in the knowledge of it.[QUOTE="Espada12"]
That's true, but unless you can disprove or them prove we are going no where. In death we shall all know!
gubrushadow
Our ancestors did not learn to shave the hair off their skin. There is evidence the points toward Africa once being a dense jungle wilderness that began to go through desertification. That is, the loss of trees and jungle habitats due to the land becoming more arid over time and due to climate change. Our ancestors, who spent most of their time in trees, began to lose their habitat and needed to make due with what they had at their disposal in their new habitat. As they were evolved for jungle living they needed to adapt to this new habitat in several ways. First they began walking upright. They wouldn't tire otu so quickly be walking upright because it took less energy and they could move for farther distances. Chimps and great apes even do it today. Due to our upright stance we could use our arms and hands for greater tool use and the holding of weapons and such. As time drew on this would lead into more sophisticated tools and weapons that could do the job better which would also lead to the enlargment of various parts of our brains. We lost our hair because we weren't built for running vast distances in search for water or food over open savannah. The less hair we had the longer we could movew and the better we could get away from predators.
[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]No. Basts do exactly the same thing when they fly. Perhaps you are trying to explain one of the current hypothesis that science has advanced. That being that the universe is sort of a spheroid in that if you send a signal in one direction eventually it will hit you in the back of the head. Much as if you threw a plane around the Earth when it came back to you it would hit you in the back of the head again. not everything must be read by its face you know , there is always a hidden message in some words ,What on Earth are you talking about?[QUOTE="gubrushadow"]let me give an example to those who says of science , in our ancieny holy book , GOD said that : "the universe will give you back what you will send " and if you have made your research you should know that scientists discovered that every signal they send through space returns to them directly , isnt that a simple proof ??gubrushadow
let me give an example to those who says of science , in our ancieny holy book , GOD said that : "the universe will give you back what you will send " and if you have made your research you should know that scientists discovered that every signal they send through space returns to them directly , isnt that a simple proof ??gubrushadowI call that simple interpretation.. The Bible is notorious for being amibigious in nearly all its passages.. To the point that no one can decide the meaning on numerous parts, aside from the main parts for Christianity.
Bumfluff, what's your opinion on my last post? I'm interested in it.oh_bossI think the satetment 'everything happens by chance' is true but only from one perspective. There is no chance when you look at cause and effect. Basically, if there was an origin of everything, everything that exists now was predetermined to exist due to cause and effect right from that first cause. However that is only if there was a first cause.
I think the satetment 'everything happens by chance' is true but only from one perspective. There is no chance when you look at cause and effect. Basically, if there was an origin of everything, everything that exists now was predetermined to exist due to cause and effect right from that first cause. However that is only if there was a first cause. So should we conclude that everything that happens is destined to happen from the beginning?[QUOTE="oh_boss"]Bumfluff, what's your opinion on my last post? I'm interested in it.BumFluff122
[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]I think the satetment 'everything happens by chance' is true but only from one perspective. There is no chance when you look at cause and effect. Basically, if there was an origin of everything, everything that exists now was predetermined to exist due to cause and effect right from that first cause. However that is only if there was a first cause. So should we conclude that everything that happens is destined to happen from the beginning?If there even was a beginning. Every cause needs to have a cause. This leads one to think that everything has always been, it's just existed in different forms.[QUOTE="oh_boss"]Bumfluff, what's your opinion on my last post? I'm interested in it.oh_boss
So should we conclude that everything that happens is destined to happen from the beginning?If there even was a beginning. Every cause needs to have a cause. This leads one to think that everything has always been, it's just existed in different forms. But is it wrong if we suppose that everything happens by chance, but strickly following nature's rules?[QUOTE="oh_boss"][QUOTE="BumFluff122"]I think the satetment 'everything happens by chance' is true but only from one perspective. There is no chance when you look at cause and effect. Basically, if there was an origin of everything, everything that exists now was predetermined to exist due to cause and effect right from that first cause. However that is only if there was a first cause.
BumFluff122
No on suggested that what so ever.. But the point of the matter is we have no evidence of the boogey man.. Should we start believing in him too with this logic? Of course not..Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
TaCoDuDe
[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]If there even was a beginning. Every cause needs to have a cause. This leads one to think that everything has always been, it's just existed in different forms. But is it wrong if we suppose that everything happens by chance, but strickly following nature's rules? if everythign folows natures rules then there is no such thing as chance.[QUOTE="oh_boss"] So should we conclude that everything that happens is destined to happen from the beginning?oh_boss
But is it wrong if we suppose that everything happens by chance, but strickly following nature's rules? if everythign folows natures rules then there is no such thing as chance. then these rules , how did they even been created , if not by their own as you say ?? then how ??[QUOTE="oh_boss"][QUOTE="BumFluff122"]If there even was a beginning. Every cause needs to have a cause. This leads one to think that everything has always been, it's just existed in different forms.
BumFluff122
No on suggested that what so ever.. But the point of the matter is we have no evidence of the boogey man.. Should we start believing in him too with this logic? Of course not.. sSubZerOoIf anything, you should suspend judgment, with judgment leaning towards belief. The fact of the matter is that we have, as humans, an innate predisposition to believe. Just as we have an innate disposition to see, feel, taste, smell and hear. I have no reason to doubt my faculty of belief any more than I do my faculties of sight, sound, smell, taste and feeling. The empirical senses do not have a one up on the religious sense.
[QUOTE="oh_boss"][QUOTE="BumFluff122"]If there even was a beginning. Every cause needs to have a cause. This leads one to think that everything has always been, it's just existed in different forms.
But is it wrong if we suppose that everything happens by chance, but strickly following nature's rules? if everythign folows natures rules then there is no such thing as chance. ... Sure there is... Natures rules creates environments.. Its all about probability given the scope of our universe.. We were lucky we weren't born in something like a star cluster, because we wouldn't have lasted long.[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]if everythign folows natures rules then there is no such thing as chance. then these rules , how did they even been created , if not by their own as you say ?? then how ??why did they need to be created? And what makes you think that first cause. if there was one, needs to be God?[QUOTE="oh_boss"] But is it wrong if we suppose that everything happens by chance, but strickly following nature's rules? gubrushadow
But is it wrong if we suppose that everything happens by chance, but strickly following nature's rules? if everythign folows natures rules then there is no such thing as chance. But the rules change though. I mean, we've witnessed physical deformations, mental illnesses etc. So if we cannot calculate how or why the rules change...doesn't it mean luck plays a big role in everything?[QUOTE="oh_boss"][QUOTE="BumFluff122"]If there even was a beginning. Every cause needs to have a cause. This leads one to think that everything has always been, it's just existed in different forms.
BumFluff122
[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]if everythign folows natures rules then there is no such thing as chance. ... Sure there is... Natures rules creates environments.. Its all about probability given the scope of our universe.. We were lucky we weren't born in something like a star cluster, because we wouldn't have lasted long.it's due to cause and effect. We wouldn't be born in a star cluster because we exist on Earth. Everything leading up to me typing this s and this u and this a is the result of cause and effect.[QUOTE="oh_boss"] But is it wrong if we suppose that everything happens by chance, but strickly following nature's rules? sSubZerOo
[QUOTE="nish2280"] ...prove itoh_bossYou didn't understand the notion of his post. Excelence mister Hipyoungster.
Uh, thanks, I guess.:P I just want to specify, though, that my main point, because even I acknowledge that my post was poorly organized, is that an intelligent designer must have been the cause of the universe, because of the way the world is organized. Random chaos couldn't have been the cause of the universe, because of the orderliness of the world. If it had been random chaos that had started the universe, the world would merely be a collection of random and chaotic events, with nothing being able to explain itself, and the world probably collapsing upon itself. The many orderly principles of the world of science show that it must have been an intelligent force that created the universe, making everything orderly and coexisting. That force is commonly referred to by religious peoples as "God". (Also, I want to clarify that I am not saying that God is actually some force of nature. The nature of God is a whole 'nother discussion, with which I would have to get philosophy into the mix, which I would rather not do:P).
Forgive me if I'm wrong but he (HipYoungster42) wasn't talking literally.oh_boss
What do you mean by that?
I don't find it logical for an omnipotent being to create this entire world just to "test" us.Maqda7Which brings us to the question; why on earth should we not doubt our logic? Why is it that logic is the barometer for all things human?
then these rules , how did they even been created , if not by their own as you say ?? then how ??why did they need to be created? And what makes you think that first cause. if there was one, needs to be God? yes GOD , who else would have done it , if you watch news , from a month i think , the american scientists concluded that Darwin's theory of evolution is false , if you believe in science so much , then you should believe the american scientists what they said , rite ??[QUOTE="gubrushadow"][QUOTE="BumFluff122"]if everythign folows natures rules then there is no such thing as chance.
BumFluff122
[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]why did they need to be created? And what makes you think that first cause. if there was one, needs to be God? yes GOD , who else would have done it , if you watch news , from a month i think , the american scientists concluded that Darwin's theory of evolution is false , if you believe in science so much , then you should believe the american scientists what they said , rite ?? There's a missing link. It doesn't mean it's false.[QUOTE="gubrushadow"] then these rules , how did they even been created , if not by their own as you say ?? then how ??gubrushadow
[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]if everythign folows natures rules then there is no such thing as chance. But the rules change though. I mean, we've witnessed physical deformations, mental illnesses etc. So if we cannot calculate how or why the rules change...doesn't it mean luck plays a big role in everything?just because we don't knwo what the cause was does not mean the rules change. All it means is that we don't know what the cause was. Natural law is still present. If it happens, it happens due to a cause. Rules don't change. If one aspect of somethign changes, such as the gravity around a star or the slowing down of time, that had a cause. Universal rules have always been and will always be. If one aspoect of those rules change there is a cause for that change.[QUOTE="oh_boss"] But is it wrong if we suppose that everything happens by chance, but strickly following nature's rules? oh_boss
[QUOTE="oh_boss"][QUOTE="nish2280"] You didn't understand the notion of his post. Excelence mister Hipyoungster.HipYoungster42
Uh, thanks, I guess.:P I just want to specify, though, that my main point, because even I acknowledge that my post was poorly organized, is that an intelligent designer must have been the cause of the universe, because of the way the world is organized. Random chaos couldn't have been the cause of the universe, because of the orderliness of the world. If it had been random chaos that had started the universe, the world would merely be a collection of random and chaotic events, with nothing being able to explain itself, and the world probably collapsing upon itself. The many orderly principles of the world of science show that it must have been an intelligent force that created the universe, making everything orderly and coexisting. That force is commonly referred to by religious peoples as "God". (Also, I want to clarify that I am not saying that God is actually some force of nature. The nature of God is a whole 'nother discussion, with which I would have to get philosophy into the mix, which I would rather not do:P).
Forgive me if I'm wrong but he (HipYoungster42) wasn't talking literally.oh_boss
What do you mean by that?
I wanted to say that you, by using the word designer, didn't imply a magician controls everything. I thought you symbolised nature's "nature" as design.[QUOTE="gubrushadow"][QUOTE="BumFluff122"]why did they need to be created? And what makes you think that first cause. if there was one, needs to be God?yes GOD , who else would have done it , if you watch news , from a month i think , the american scientists concluded that Darwin's theory of evolution is false , if you believe in science so much , then you should believe the american scientists what they said , rite ?? There's a missing link. It doesn't mean it's false.oh_boss
i still dont understand you , do you believe in GOD or not ??
The flying spaghetti monster is real! I knew it!Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
TaCoDuDe
But the rules change though. I mean, we've witnessed physical deformations, mental illnesses etc. So if we cannot calculate how or why the rules change...doesn't it mean luck plays a big role in everything?just because we don't knwo what the cause was does not mean the rules change. All it means is that we don't know what the cause was. Natural law is still present. If it happens, it happens due to a cause. Rules don't change. If one aspect of somethign changes, such as the gravity around a star or the slowing down of time, that had a cause. Universal rules have always been and will always be. If one aspoect of those rules change there is a cause for that change. Agreed. So now, what if religious people used the whole notion of "God" to understate nature and thus personificating it? In short, let's say cause and effect=god. But since we do not know the cause of all causes, does that mean that there is this "god" or not?[QUOTE="oh_boss"][QUOTE="BumFluff122"]if everythign folows natures rules then there is no such thing as chance.
BumFluff122
There's a missing link. It doesn't mean it's false.[QUOTE="oh_boss"][QUOTE="gubrushadow"] yes GOD , who else would have done it , if you watch news , from a month i think , the american scientists concluded that Darwin's theory of evolution is false , if you believe in science so much , then you should believe the american scientists what they said , rite ??gubrushadow
i still dont understand you , do you believe in GOD or not ??
Which god again? D:[QUOTE="gubrushadow"][QUOTE="oh_boss"] There's a missing link. It doesn't mean it's false.oh_boss
i still dont understand you , do you believe in GOD or not ??
Which god again? D: It's pretty obvious that he's talking about Thor, I mean, who wouldn't believe in Thor?[QUOTE="gubrushadow"][QUOTE="oh_boss"] There's a missing link. It doesn't mean it's false.oh_boss
i still dont understand you , do you believe in GOD or not ??
Which god again? D: any GOD , your GOD , i dunno which GOD do you think im talking about , but do you believe in one of them ??[QUOTE="T_P_O"][QUOTE="Maqda7"]I don't find it logical for an omnipotent being to create this entire world just to "test" us.Maqda7He may have just gotten bored and decided that he'd have fun with us. What a cruel sense of humor he must have. Yeah, 'tis why I don't like to think about Abrahamic religions and just read about obscure ones.
The whole "Designed by intelligence" argument is possibly the failest thing ever. Your theory goes by the idea that something complex must have been created by an intelligence. This argument fails right here to begin with, as a designer would have be designed, as they are also a complex being.
Not to mention the fact that Evolution has been proven.
[QUOTE="HipYoungster42"]
[QUOTE="gubrushadow"] what about you ??STAR_Admiral
Me? I'm a Unificationist, and a strong believer in God.
Also, I'd like to point out that I don't blindly believe in God. I believe in God, yes, partially because of my upbringing, but also because I've been shown evidence of God existence. I'd probably say that the biggest evidence of the existence of God is theuniverse itself. When you look at the universe, you can clearly see that everything works according to scientific principle; nothing happens by chance.This shows that the universe did notbegin randomly, and does not operate randomly. This shows that there must have been some design behind the universe, and with every design, there is a designer. This designer is quite frankly, God.
Sorry but your evidence is fail, since when does everything that operates by laws and scientific principles have to have a designer? This shows that the universe did notbegin randomly, and does not operate randomly. This statement i agree with but it in no way indictes nor suggests that the universe was designed, it is fallacious to makesuch a claim. and if eerything what works by ordered principles needs a designer, then who designed God? you see the point? you get into this endless chain of design. I recognize that the universe obey laws such as gravity and follows principles. But these principles are inherent aspects of the universe, they are not designed by anything or anyone, they are there and have always been there.Many things have a designer. Buildings, bridges, cars. However many things do not, waterfalls, life, planets. To say that all these things must have a designer just because the 0.0000001% of the universethat we created has a designer is incredibly fallacious
That's a whole 'nother discussion, which like I said in my previous post, would force me to bring philosophy into the mix, which I'm trying not to do for the time being.
It has already been proven that the universe had a beginning; the very laws and principles of our universe are no different. They too had a beginning, no matter how many billions of years ago that may have been.
But that's where your wrong. There must have been an intelligent designer to have created those things, or they would have been a lot less orderly than they are today. Anyways, if it hadn't been God who created the universe, and it wasn't random chaos, either, then how do you suppose the universe came to be?
[QUOTE="oh_boss"][QUOTE="gubrushadow"]Which god again? D: any GOD , your GOD , i dunno which GOD do you think im talking about , but do you believe in one of them ??i still dont understand you , do you believe in GOD or not ??
gubrushadow
Oh I do believe that one of those gods exist but I do not choose to let myself be ruled by said god. I don't believe in christianity's god though. I personally think it's a pile of closeminded BS.
the excuses you guys are providing as the reasons why you are atheists are getting old and boring.The excuses? The reason why you think they are getting old is because it is the same reason why many people don't believe in an invisible superman or a flying sppaghetti monster or pink unicorns with tentacles coming out of their eyes. There is no evidence. Since the beginning of your religion of choice there has not been any evidence. That is why to believe one must have 'faith'. Would you like us to come up with another reason why we don't believe? what was that? again with your unoriginality.[QUOTE="GazaAli"][QUOTE="BumFluff122"]if you're talking in general then perhaps you can explain your question of "What is that?" what specifrically are you asking about?
BumFluff122
[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]The excuses? The reason why you think they are getting old is because it is the same reason why many people don't believe in an invisible superman or a flying sppaghetti monster or pink unicorns with tentacles coming out of their eyes. There is no evidence. Since the beginning of your religion of choice there has not been any evidence. That is why to believe one must have 'faith'. Would you like us to come up with another reason why we don't believe? what was that? again with your unoriginality. Actually, even if I support religion, the messages that the christian church is trying to pass nowadays, are pretty "unbelievable"[QUOTE="GazaAli"] the excuses you guys are providing as the reasons why you are atheists are getting old and boring.GazaAli
It has already been proven that the universe had a beginning; the very laws and principles of our universe are no different. They too had a beginning, no matter how many billions of years ago that may have been. HipYoungster42Actually, no it hasn't. The fact that there was a big bang (highly debateable by the way) does not prove that there was a starting point to the universe. For all we know, there could be mechanics of unyet discovered quantum physics which allows for a self-sustaining, constant universe through a series of compactions. This was Einstein's theory a long time ago, and it hasn't been conclusively disproven.
Prove to me that the order in the universe could not have orginated from chaos. Better yet, prove to me that the order you perceive isn't merely in your own head, and the universe isn't truly chaotic. For all you know, we live in a chaotic universe in comparison to the potentiality of normacy out there.But that's where your wrong. There must have been an intelligent designer to have created those things, or they would have been a lot less orderly than they are today. Anyways, if it hadn't been God who created the universe, and it wasn't random chaos, either, then how do you suppose the universe came to be
But that's where your wrong. There must have been an intelligent designer to have created those things, or they would have been a lot less orderly than they are today. Anyways, if it hadn't been God who created the universe, and it wasn't random chaos, either, then how do you suppose the universe came to be?David Hume, the Philosopher, had a great argument against the argument from design. Hume reasoned that if a well-ordered natural world requires a special designer, then God's mind (being so well-ordered) also requires a special designer. And then this designer would likewise need a designer, and so on ad infinitum. We could respond by resting content with an inexplicably self-ordered divine mind but then why not rest content with an inexplicably self-ordered natural world?HipYoungster42
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment