The Gamespot Gun Control Debate

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for DaJuicyMan
DaJuicyMan

3557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 DaJuicyMan
Member since 2010 • 3557 Posts

Whoa, okay I have alot to respond to and have work in the morning so I'll try to wrap this up.

First, guy who said swimming pools are as dangerous as guns.... As creative of an answer that was, it seems stupid to me to say pools are as dangerous as guns.

airshocker: I agree people will kill eachother with anything, my point was making it way more difficult or illegal to obtain these extremely efficient killing machines, is a good idea. Countries with capable governments and strict gun control don't have these problems in the droves we do. The point these guys were arguing was that guns have a useful purpose outside of killing, not so much gun control.

To everyone: This whole "bad things will happen no matter what" attitude is defeatist and unacceptable to me, not every sensible thing that could possibly prevent these things from happening has been tried yet.

It all goes back to the point I've made over and over. Guns were invented to kill, they serve no other useful, necessary purpose that cannot be adequately done by something else, and them being as available as they are now is not working, obviously as demonsrated today and tons of other times in recent years.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#152 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

Whoa, okay I have alot to respond to and have work in the morning so I'll try to wrap this up.

DaJuicyMan
Working on the sabath is illegal. shame on youl
Avatar image for DJ419
DJ419

1016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 DJ419
Member since 2005 • 1016 Posts

Guns should only be owned by government appointed soldiers.

sonicare

Yikes! When did that ever end good?

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#154 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

[QUOTE="sonicare"]

Guns should only be owned by government appointed soldiers.

DJ419

Yikes! When did that ever end good?

Works great for Russia.
Avatar image for Vari3ty
Vari3ty

11111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 Vari3ty
Member since 2009 • 11111 Posts

[QUOTE="sonicare"]

Guns should only be owned by government appointed soldiers.

DJ419

Yikes! When did that ever end good?

Pretty sure that was sarcasm... I hope...

Avatar image for soulless4now
soulless4now

41388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#156 soulless4now
Member since 2003 • 41388 Posts

We should all take up archery instead. It's the only solution to this madness.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#157 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
The gun laws in the US are working well as usual I see.
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#158 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

We should all take up archery instead. It's the only solution to this madness.

soulless4now

The only solution to this madness is to realize that bad people will do bad things and there's absolutely nothing we can do that will mitigate the effects of those actions completely.

If we ban guns only criminals will have them.

If we add more gun control legislation it'll make it even worse for those of us who own our weapons legally.

The vast majority of gun owners don't commit crimes with their weapons. I don't see where we deserve to be punished because of people who break the law. It would be akin to banning baseball because somebody murdered another person with a bat.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#159 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

The gun laws in the US are working well as usual I see.SolidSnake35

As I have just found out, the killer didn't purchase the weapons he used to kill these people. So the gun laws had nothing to do with it.

Avatar image for Abbeten
Abbeten

3140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 Abbeten
Member since 2012 • 3140 Posts
god bless ronald reagan
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#161 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]The gun laws in the US are working well as usual I see.airshocker

As I have just found out, the killer didn't purchase the weapons he used to kill these people. So the gun laws had nothing to do with it.

The killer grew up in a society where guns are thrown around willy nilly. In the UK, the idea of someone pulling a gun on you belongs in a Hollywood movie. You guys are too blase with guns to the point where everyone and their mother has one. That's depressing.
Avatar image for DaJuicyMan
DaJuicyMan

3557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 DaJuicyMan
Member since 2010 • 3557 Posts
[QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]The gun laws in the US are working well as usual I see.SolidSnake35

As I have just found out, the killer didn't purchase the weapons he used to kill these people. So the gun laws had nothing to do with it.

The killer grew up in a society where guns are thrown around willy nilly. In the UK, the idea of someone pulling a gun on you belongs in a Hollywood movie. You guys are too blase with guns to the point where everyone and their mother has one. That's depressing.

Exactly.
Avatar image for DJ419
DJ419

1016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 DJ419
Member since 2005 • 1016 Posts

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]The gun laws in the US are working well as usual I see.SolidSnake35

As I have just found out, the killer didn't purchase the weapons he used to kill these people. So the gun laws had nothing to do with it.

The killer grew up in a society where guns are thrown around willy nilly. In the UK, the idea of someone pulling a gun on you belongs in a Hollywood movie. You guys are too blase with guns to the point where everyone and their mother has one. That's depressing.

Connecticut has some of the most strict gun control laws in the entire United States. I'm not really sure how you've come to the conclusion that all Americans live in a society where guns are worshipped. I'm gonna take a wild guess and assume you've based that on nothing. Mental illness is not caused by gun friendly societies. Also, your deflection skills could use a little work.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#164 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

The killer grew up in a society where guns are thrown around willy nilly. In the UK, the idea of someone pulling a gun on you belongs in a Hollywood movie. You guys are too blase with guns to the point where everyone and their mother has one. That's depressing.SolidSnake35

Proven wrong, throws around horsesh*t. :lol:

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#165 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]The killer grew up in a society where guns are thrown around willy nilly. In the UK, the idea of someone pulling a gun on you belongs in a Hollywood movie. You guys are too blase with guns to the point where everyone and their mother has one. That's depressing.airshocker

Proven wrong, throws around horsesh*t. :lol:

Didn't prove anything. My point is that guns are legal in the US and that's how he obtained the weapons. I don't care whether he bought them or not. He found them because guns are everywhere. Hardly surprising to see all these killings.
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#166 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Didn't prove anything. My point is that guns are legal in the US and that's how he obtained the weapons. I don't care whether he bought them or not. He found them because guns are everywhere. Hardly surprising to see all these killings.SolidSnake35

You said "gun control laws working as usual" or some such when this had nothing to do with gun control laws. Stealing your mothers guns has nothing to do with gun control. It has more to do with bad housekeeping than anything else.

Then you proceeded to write some tripe(and continue to) that has no basis in fact, as you usually do in any thread about gun related crimes or gun control. Thus my statement comes into play.

I hope you enjoyed this as much as I have.

Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35554 Posts
Dave reporting in to make comments about comments
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#168 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]Didn't prove anything. My point is that guns are legal in the US and that's how he obtained the weapons. I don't care whether he bought them or not. He found them because guns are everywhere. Hardly surprising to see all these killings.airshocker

You said "gun control laws working as usual" or some such when this had nothing to do with gun control laws. Stealing your mothers guns has nothing to do with gun control. It has more to do with bad housekeeping than anything else.

Then you proceeded to write some tripe(and continue to) that has no basis in fact, as you usually do in any thread about gun related crimes or gun control. Thus my statement comes into play.

I hope you enjoyed this as much as I have.

I did.
Avatar image for -RocBoys9489-
-RocBoys9489-

6336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 -RocBoys9489-
Member since 2008 • 6336 Posts

[QUOTE="DJ419"]

[QUOTE="sonicare"]

Guns should only be owned by government appointed soldiers.

Vari3ty

Yikes! When did that ever end good?

Pretty sure that was sarcasm... I hope...

Avatar image for Abbeten
Abbeten

3140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 Abbeten
Member since 2012 • 3140 Posts
there could be something to be said about mandatory training that would drive home the concept of keeping your gun in a safe
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#171 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

there could be something to be said about mandatory training that would drive home the concept of keeping your gun in a safeAbbeten

The training that happens in my county covers keeping your weapons locked up and out of reach.

Do we even know if this mother left her weapons laying around?

Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#172 dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35554 Posts
I support some kind of mandatory training system
Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35554 Posts
I am happy to see that air shocker and solid snake can enjoy a lively debate
Avatar image for iowastate
iowastate

7922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#174 iowastate
Member since 2004 • 7922 Posts

[QUOTE="thegerg"]All I have to say is that I'm all about some gun control, but an outright ban is just silly. It's just scary to think that some people believe that cops and soldiers should be the only ones with guns.TacticalDesire

Well I agree. I think wait periods, background checks etc are smart, and I have no problem with strict regulation. Banning is silly and also at this point highly unrealistic.

once you start letting the control nuts start regulations that are only small violations of the Second Amendment it begins the trip down the road to their attempts to eliminate our Second Amendment Rights. for those of you who think that is not a bad thing - if one of the amendments is violated what guarantee do we have that the rest of the amendments will be secure? you have to preserve all of the Amendment or none of them. once you start down the slippery slope of letting some people lose their rights what assurance do you have that anyone's rights will be preserved? don't count on the politicians in Washington of any party to look out for anyone other than themselves and their next election victory. I won't mention the judges or Supreme Court because who is left that still has faith in them O_O
Avatar image for Lordofinternet
Lordofinternet

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 Lordofinternet
Member since 2012 • 218 Posts
[QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]The gun laws in the US are working well as usual I see.SolidSnake35

As I have just found out, the killer didn't purchase the weapons he used to kill these people. So the gun laws had nothing to do with it.

The killer grew up in a society where guns are thrown around willy nilly. In the UK, the idea of someone pulling a gun on you belongs in a Hollywood movie. You guys are too blase with guns to the point where everyone and their mother has one. That's depressing.

Where are you getting the first and last sentence?
Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35554 Posts
Gun control needs to be looked into Look at me blink, O_O .o_o .-_- o_o O_O
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

Explain how gun ownership is going to stop a team like Seal 6 from devastating you if they so deemed fit. It sounds like a very false sense of security because they have plenty of things you dont have (riot gear, shields, explosives, tear gas, etc.) not to mention the extensive vehicular weaponry. You'd stand no chance in a full scale government take over.

Yusuke420
Here's the thing: if a "full scale government takeover" happened tommorow, how many people are going to be on the side who's taking over? Seal Team 6 might not hesitate to raid YOUR house if that's deemed fit. But it'll sure as hell be a different matter to raid EVERYONE'S house. There are millions and millions of armed gunowners in the USA, and only so many members of Seal Team 6.
Avatar image for Yusuke420
Yusuke420

2770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#178 Yusuke420
Member since 2012 • 2770 Posts

[QUOTE="Yusuke420"]

Explain how gun ownership is going to stop a team like Seal 6 from devastating you if they so deemed fit. It sounds like a very false sense of security because they have plenty of things you dont have (riot gear, shields, explosives, tear gas, etc.) not to mention the extensive vehicular weaponry. You'd stand no chance in a full scale government take over.

MrGeezer

Here's the thing: if a "full scale government takeover" happened tommorow, how many people are going to be on the side who's taking over? Seal Team 6 might not hesitate to raid YOUR house if that's deemed fit. But it'll sure as hell be a different matter to raid EVERYONE'S house. There are millions and millions of armed gunowners in the USA, and only so many members of Seal Team 6.

I'm pretty sure that a ground operation wouldn't be used, I was just giving an example. A couple of daisy cutters in populated areas would be enough to get the attention of the population, mess with us and get obiterated, I'm sure. You don't think there would be some in the military that would take tresure and power over protecting random people they don't know?

Avatar image for DanteSuikoden
DanteSuikoden

3427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 DanteSuikoden
Member since 2008 • 3427 Posts

Remember when we tried to get rid of alcohol?

Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts

Remember when we tried to get rid of alcohol?

DanteSuikoden
Remember what happened when people put laws regarding the sale, and consumption, of alcohol to minors? Oh, yea... that's the right thing to do 'reasonable regulation'. Gun control doesn't necessarily = gun bans.
Avatar image for Shmiity
Shmiity

6625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#181 Shmiity
Member since 2006 • 6625 Posts

[QUOTE="DanteSuikoden"]

Remember when we tried to get rid of alcohol?

Inconsistancy

Remember what happened when people put laws regarding the sale, and consumption, of alcohol to minors? Oh, yea... that's the right thing to do 'reasonable regulation'. Gun control doesn't necessarily = gun bans.

It's a good example though, dude... Prohibition failed miserably. Crime rates went through the roof, and it was a huge f*ck up. I understand guns and alcohol are two totally different things. But installing a gun ban/heavier control now.... How would that even work? Turn in your guns at the local town office? There are already too many in the people's hands. The war on drugs isnt working either. Making drugs illegal and this draconian system have made it worse.

I honestly dont have a strong opinion on either end. Heavier control is known to cause great illegal activity. But right now, this sh*t aint working, either.

Avatar image for nunovlopes
nunovlopes

2638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 nunovlopes
Member since 2009 • 2638 Posts

[QUOTE="nunovlopes"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"]There have been more than a few times throughout history where the state has taken control of its people and its law (rather than the other way around) through the use of violence. While it is highly unlikely and not going to happen in the foreseeable future, that is little reason to be willfully unprepared for such an event. thegerg

But with the US military being as it is, do you think poorly organized citizens armed with guns could do anything about it? It's gotten to a point where it would be like people fighting with sticks. Whoever controls the military holds all the power.

Yes. The military (from my own experience) is full of the types of people that are opposed to their own rights being violated and will not obey an unlawful order. Of course there are still some brainwashed fools that will do anything someone wearing a few rockers tells them to, but they're hardly the majority.

So you're saying that most people in the military wouldn't turn against fellow Americans. If that's the case, there's no real threat, so you don't really need guns to defend yourself from something that will not happen. If there are no people in the military or the police willing to fire against civilians, what can the government do by itself? On the other hand, if the military does decide to turn against citizens, there's nothing you can do about it. So either way, there's not much you can or need to do.
Avatar image for poptart
poptart

7298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#183 poptart
Member since 2003 • 7298 Posts

[QUOTE="Inconsistancy"][QUOTE="DanteSuikoden"]

Remember when we tried to get rid of alcohol?

Shmiity

Remember what happened when people put laws regarding the sale, and consumption, of alcohol to minors? Oh, yea... that's the right thing to do 'reasonable regulation'. Gun control doesn't necessarily = gun bans.

It's a good example though, dude... Prohibition failed miserably. Crime rates went through the roof, and it was a huge f*ck up. I understand guns and alcohol are two totally different things. But installing a gun ban/heavier control now.... How would that even work? Turn in your guns at the local town office? There are already too many in the people's hands. The war on drugs isnt working either. Making drugs illegal and this draconian system have made it worse.

I honestly dont have a strong opinion on either end. Heavier control is known to cause great illegal activity. But right now, this sh*t aint working, either.

Recreation/untold violence aint a compaison worth making. Kids pop pills up their ass every friday and saturday night - the impulsive will to shoot your mother?................................ well that's probably just on the comedown,

EDIT: The point is prohibition does work when it comes to guns.

Avatar image for nunovlopes
nunovlopes

2638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#184 nunovlopes
Member since 2009 • 2638 Posts
[QUOTE="DaJuicyMan"][QUOTE="thegerg"][QUOTE="DaJuicyMan"] You can shoot targets without a gun.. You don't have to ski and shoot (which sounds really stupid) you could ski and do literally anything else, run maybe? .. You can collect literally anything, you don't need to collect guns. If these are the best uses you can think of.. Guns are used to kill..."b-but you can shoot targets too!" Cool, get a paintball gun, you dont need bullets to hit a target. Plus doing these petty things are not worth all the horrible things that come with guns.

Of course you can shoot targets without a gun. However, you can't partake in pistol competitions without a pistol or a biathlon without a rifle. I was simply answering your question. Instead of arguing you should say "thank you." Anyway, those are not the "best uses" of a gun. Simply uses other than killing, which you (for some ignorant reason) did not believe existed.

It's like saying nukes have other purposes besides killing mass amounts of people, and then saying you can play fort on them, you can collect nukes, you can do nuke lifting competitions..

Lol nuke lifting, that would be cool!
Avatar image for Shmiity
Shmiity

6625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#185 Shmiity
Member since 2006 • 6625 Posts

[QUOTE="Shmiity"]

[QUOTE="Inconsistancy"] Remember what happened when people put laws regarding the sale, and consumption, of alcohol to minors? Oh, yea... that's the right thing to do 'reasonable regulation'. Gun control doesn't necessarily = gun bans.poptart

It's a good example though, dude... Prohibition failed miserably. Crime rates went through the roof, and it was a huge f*ck up. I understand guns and alcohol are two totally different things. But installing a gun ban/heavier control now.... How would that even work? Turn in your guns at the local town office? There are already too many in the people's hands. The war on drugs isnt working either. Making drugs illegal and this draconian system have made it worse.

I honestly dont have a strong opinion on either end. Heavier control is known to cause great illegal activity. But right now, this sh*t aint working, either.

Recreation/untold violence aint a compaison worth making. Kids pop pills up their ass every friday and saturday night - the impulsive will to shoot your mother?................................ well that's probably just on the comedown,

EDIT: The point is prohibition does work when it comes to guns.

I understand what youre saying- but there are already so many guns, and it is so easy to get a gun in general- by any means- so what can actually be done to ban guns?

Avatar image for poptart
poptart

7298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#186 poptart
Member since 2003 • 7298 Posts

[QUOTE="poptart"]

[QUOTE="Shmiity"]

It's a good example though, dude... Prohibition failed miserably. Crime rates went through the roof, and it was a huge f*ck up. I understand guns and alcohol are two totally different things. But installing a gun ban/heavier control now.... How would that even work? Turn in your guns at the local town office? There are already too many in the people's hands. The war on drugs isnt working either. Making drugs illegal and this draconian system have made it worse.

I honestly dont have a strong opinion on either end. Heavier control is known to cause great illegal activity. But right now, this sh*t aint working, either.

Shmiity

Recreation/untold violence aint a compaison worth making. Kids pop pills up their ass every friday and saturday night - the impulsive will to shoot your mother?................................ well that's probably just on the comedown,

EDIT: The point is prohibition does work when it comes to guns.

I understand what youre saying- but there are already so many guns, and it is so easy to get a gun in general- by any means- so what can actually be done to ban guns?

There's already too many guns is akin to 'grrrrrrr it just seems a bit too difficult so lets not bother'. Gotta start somewhere. And is it easy to get guns? Not sure where you're from but in the UK and OZ I wouldn't know where to start. Anything else sure no worries, but guns - I'd have to delve into some pretty sketchy territory...

Avatar image for Shmiity
Shmiity

6625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#187 Shmiity
Member since 2006 • 6625 Posts

[QUOTE="Shmiity"]

[QUOTE="poptart"]

Recreation/untold violence aint a compaison worth making. Kids pop pills up their ass every friday and saturday night - the impulsive will to shoot your mother?................................ well that's probably just on the comedown,

EDIT: The point is prohibition does work when it comes to guns.

poptart

I understand what youre saying- but there are already so many guns, and it is so easy to get a gun in general- by any means- so what can actually be done to ban guns?

There's already too many guns is akin to 'grrrrrrr it just seems a bit too difficult so lets not bother'. Gotta start somewhere. And is it easy to get guns? Not sure where you're from but in the UK and OZ I wouldn't know where to start. Anything else sure no worries, but guns - I'd have to delve into some pretty sketchy territory...

Guns in the USA are everywhere. You can get a license very easily, even in strict states. Even if you dont have a license, there are shooting ranges everywhere. There are 2-3 gun stores in my area, and I live up North to boot. Guns are incredibly easy to get in the USA, legally, and illegally. Because they exist in so many establishments.

Avatar image for BeardMaster
BeardMaster

1686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 BeardMaster
Member since 2012 • 1686 Posts

[QUOTE="Inconsistancy"][QUOTE="DanteSuikoden"]

Remember when we tried to get rid of alcohol?

Shmiity

Remember what happened when people put laws regarding the sale, and consumption, of alcohol to minors? Oh, yea... that's the right thing to do 'reasonable regulation'. Gun control doesn't necessarily = gun bans.

It's a good example though, dude... Prohibition failed miserably. Crime rates went through the roof, and it was a huge f*ck up. I understand guns and alcohol are two totally different things. But installing a gun ban/heavier control now.... How would that even work? Turn in your guns at the local town office? There are already too many in the people's hands. The war on drugs isnt working either. Making drugs illegal and this draconian system have made it worse.

I honestly dont have a strong opinion on either end. Heavier control is known to cause great illegal activity. But right now, this sh*t aint working, either.

cant brew guns in your bathtub.

yea, you make guns illegal and have people turn em in. Over the years people that refuse to turn em in get caught and firearms get confiscated... eventually civilian guns become virtually non existent.

I dont understand why its such a difficult concept to grasp for some. Gun violence is a relatively simple and easily solvable issue.

Avatar image for nunovlopes
nunovlopes

2638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#189 nunovlopes
Member since 2009 • 2638 Posts

[QUOTE="poptart"]

[QUOTE="Shmiity"]

It's a good example though, dude... Prohibition failed miserably. Crime rates went through the roof, and it was a huge f*ck up. I understand guns and alcohol are two totally different things. But installing a gun ban/heavier control now.... How would that even work? Turn in your guns at the local town office? There are already too many in the people's hands. The war on drugs isnt working either. Making drugs illegal and this draconian system have made it worse.

I honestly dont have a strong opinion on either end. Heavier control is known to cause great illegal activity. But right now, this sh*t aint working, either.

Shmiity

Recreation/untold violence aint a compaison worth making. Kids pop pills up their ass every friday and saturday night - the impulsive will to shoot your mother?................................ well that's probably just on the comedown,

EDIT: The point is prohibition does work when it comes to guns.

I understand what youre saying- but there are already so many guns, and it is so easy to get a gun in general- by any means- so what can actually be done to ban guns?

Maybe start advertising campaigns geared towards kids that make it look uncool to have guns. In a couple of generations problem would be solved.
Avatar image for poptart
poptart

7298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#190 poptart
Member since 2003 • 7298 Posts

[QUOTE="poptart"]

[QUOTE="Shmiity"]

I understand what youre saying- but there are already so many guns, and it is so easy to get a gun in general- by any means- so what can actually be done to ban guns?

Shmiity

There's already too many guns is akin to 'grrrrrrr it just seems a bit too difficult so lets not bother'. Gotta start somewhere. And is it easy to get guns? Not sure where you're from but in the UK and OZ I wouldn't know where to start. Anything else sure no worries, but guns - I'd have to delve into some pretty sketchy territory...

Guns in the USA are everywhere. You can get a license very easily, even in strict states. Even if you dont have a license, there are shooting ranges everywhere. There are 2-3 gun stores in my area, and I live up North to boot. Guns are incredibly easy to get in the USA, legally, and illegally. Because they exist in so many establishments.

My point is take those gun shops away and you'll find it harder to buy one. Drugs sure - easy to find whatever as it's driven by recreation and addiction. Guns not so much. Take it away and people really - really - won't find much a need to have one. If you haven't had the need for one previously then you'll take it or leave it. That's my spinach anyhoo ducky x

Avatar image for vfibsux
vfibsux

4497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#191 vfibsux
Member since 2003 • 4497 Posts

Why do people think someone who is willing to commit 26 counts of the worst crime possible would not break a gun law?

Avatar image for vfibsux
vfibsux

4497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#192 vfibsux
Member since 2003 • 4497 Posts

[QUOTE="Shmiity"]

[QUOTE="poptart"]

There's already too many guns is akin to 'grrrrrrr it just seems a bit too difficult so lets not bother'. Gotta start somewhere. And is it easy to get guns? Not sure where you're from but in the UK and OZ I wouldn't know where to start. Anything else sure no worries, but guns - I'd have to delve into some pretty sketchy territory...

poptart

Guns in the USA are everywhere. You can get a license very easily, even in strict states. Even if you dont have a license, there are shooting ranges everywhere. There are 2-3 gun stores in my area, and I live up North to boot. Guns are incredibly easy to get in the USA, legally, and illegally. Because they exist in so many establishments.

My point is take those gun shops away and you'll find it harder to buy one. Drugs sure - easy to find whatever as it's driven by recreation and addiction. Guns not so much. Take it away and people really - really - won't find much a need to have one. If you haven't had the need for one previously then you'll take it or leave it. That's my spinach anyhoo ducky x

You're delusional if you don't think street thugs would not still see the need for guns. So basically you just disarmed every law abiding citizen and made them fair game for the people who could care less for your laws.
Avatar image for vfibsux
vfibsux

4497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#194 vfibsux
Member since 2003 • 4497 Posts
[QUOTE="nunovlopes"][QUOTE="thegerg"]Yes. The military (from my own experience) is full of the types of people that are opposed to their own rights being violated and will not obey an unlawful order. Of course there are still some brainwashed fools that will do anything someone wearing a few rockers tells them to, but they're hardly the majority.thegerg
So you're saying that most people in the military wouldn't turn against fellow Americans. If that's the case, there's no real threat, so you don't really need guns to defend yourself from something that will not happen. If there are no people in the military or the police willing to fire against civilians, what can the government do by itself? On the other hand, if the military does decide to turn against citizens, there's nothing you can do about it. So either way, there's not much you can or need to do.

Simply because many won't want to kill civilians doesn't mean the civilian population need not defend from those that will or doesn't need means to remove tyrannical agents of the state.

Lucky for us people on message boards do not interpret our constitutional rights.
Avatar image for poptart
poptart

7298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#195 poptart
Member since 2003 • 7298 Posts

[QUOTE="poptart"]

[QUOTE="Shmiity"]

Guns in the USA are everywhere. You can get a license very easily, even in strict states. Even if you dont have a license, there are shooting ranges everywhere. There are 2-3 gun stores in my area, and I live up North to boot. Guns are incredibly easy to get in the USA, legally, and illegally. Because they exist in so many establishments.

vfibsux

My point is take those gun shops away and you'll find it harder to buy one. Drugs sure - easy to find whatever as it's driven by recreation and addiction. Guns not so much. Take it away and people really - really - won't find much a need to have one. If you haven't had the need for one previously then you'll take it or leave it. That's my spinach anyhoo ducky x

You're delusional if you don't think street thugs would not still see the need for guns. So basically you just disarmed every law abiding citizen and made them fair game for the people who could care less for your laws.

'Thugs' would buy guns, but primarily to kill other 'thugs' - that's the way the world generally works. Here in Melbourne - circa 4 million people - you get the odd premeditated murder with a gun, however when it comes to the 'unarmed' being killed by those gun-wielding thugs you speak of, it just doesn't happen... or at least such is the rarity when it does it's fu*king massive. Delusion you speak of (driven by gun ownership propaganda) is alas to think that criminal overlords will suddenly start to shoot the innocent because they're unprotected.

Avatar image for vfibsux
vfibsux

4497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#196 vfibsux
Member since 2003 • 4497 Posts

[QUOTE="vfibsux"][QUOTE="poptart"]

My point is take those gun shops away and you'll find it harder to buy one. Drugs sure - easy to find whatever as it's driven by recreation and addiction. Guns not so much. Take it away and people really - really - won't find much a need to have one. If you haven't had the need for one previously then you'll take it or leave it. That's my spinach anyhoo ducky x

poptart

You're delusional if you don't think street thugs would not still see the need for guns. So basically you just disarmed every law abiding citizen and made them fair game for the people who could care less for your laws.

'Thugs' would buy guns, but primarily to kill other 'thugs' - that's the way the world generally works. Here in Melbourne - circa 4 million people - you get the odd premeditated murder with a gun, however when it comes to the 'unarmed' being killed by those gun-wielding thugs you speak of, it just doesn't happen... or at least such is the rarity when it does it's fu*king massive. Delusion you speak of (driven by gun ownership propaganda) is alas to think that criminal overlords will suddenly start to shoot the innocent because they're unprotected.

So basically you are admitting that thugs shy away from the typical population because there is a chance they could be armed. Thanks. Explains why Washington DC became the murder capitol of the world AFTER handguns were made illegal. Thanks for proving my point.
Avatar image for poptart
poptart

7298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 poptart
Member since 2003 • 7298 Posts

[QUOTE="poptart"]

[QUOTE="vfibsux"] You're delusional if you don't think street thugs would not still see the need for guns. So basically you just disarmed every law abiding citizen and made them fair game for the people who could care less for your laws.vfibsux

'Thugs' would buy guns, but primarily to kill other 'thugs' - that's the way the world generally works. Here in Melbourne - circa 4 million people - you get the odd premeditated murder with a gun, however when it comes to the 'unarmed' being killed by those gun-wielding thugs you speak of, it just doesn't happen... or at least such is the rarity when it does it's fu*king massive. Delusion you speak of (driven by gun ownership propaganda) is alas to think that criminal overlords will suddenly start to shoot the innocent because they're unprotected.

So basically you are admitting that thugs shy away from the typical population because there is a chance they could be armed. Thanks. Explains why Washington DC became the murder capitol of the world AFTER handguns were made illegal. Thanks for proving my point.

No you misread, I'm saying no one shoots each other because no one has a gun. Aside from those 'thugs' who on the odd occassion kill each other over the ownership of coke/smack/ice/whatever territory. Seriously no one gets shot in day to day life. I can walk down the street without a gun and not feel threatened or like a cu*t. Weird I know but true.

Avatar image for vfibsux
vfibsux

4497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#198 vfibsux
Member since 2003 • 4497 Posts

[QUOTE="vfibsux"][QUOTE="poptart"]

'Thugs' would buy guns, but primarily to kill other 'thugs' - that's the way the world generally works. Here in Melbourne - circa 4 million people - you get the odd premeditated murder with a gun, however when it comes to the 'unarmed' being killed by those gun-wielding thugs you speak of, it just doesn't happen... or at least such is the rarity when it does it's fu*king massive. Delusion you speak of (driven by gun ownership propaganda) is alas to think that criminal overlords will suddenly start to shoot the innocent because they're unprotected.

poptart

So basically you are admitting that thugs shy away from the typical population because there is a chance they could be armed. Thanks. Explains why Washington DC became the murder capitol of the world AFTER handguns were made illegal. Thanks for proving my point.

No you misread, I'm saying no one shoots each other because no one has a gun. Aside from those 'thugs' who on the odd occassion kill each other over the ownership of coke/smack/ice/whatever territory. Seriously no one gets shot in day to day life. I can walk down the street without a gun and not feel threatened or like a cu*t. Weird I know but true.

First of all you are talking about one person's experience and one place in the entire world.....anecdotes ftl. If you seriously think criminals do not use firearms on unarmed people you are either lieing or are seriously misinformed or uneducated. If a robber is casing two stores, one has an armed guard and the other doesn't which one will he choose to rob? If he knows one of the owners has a gun behind the counter and the other doesn't which one will he rob? Why do you people lack such simple logic skills? Do you seriously believe if guns are illegal robbers will stop using guns to rob convenient stores? Are you even listening to yourself?
Avatar image for poptart
poptart

7298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#199 poptart
Member since 2003 • 7298 Posts

[QUOTE="poptart"]

[QUOTE="vfibsux"] So basically you are admitting that thugs shy away from the typical population because there is a chance they could be armed. Thanks. Explains why Washington DC became the murder capitol of the world AFTER handguns were made illegal. Thanks for proving my point.vfibsux

No you misread, I'm saying no one shoots each other because no one has a gun. Aside from those 'thugs' who on the odd occassion kill each other over the ownership of coke/smack/ice/whatever territory. Seriously no one gets shot in day to day life. I can walk down the street without a gun and not feel threatened or like a cu*t. Weird I know but true.

First of all you are talking about one person's experience and one place in the entire world.....anecdotes ftl. If you seriously think criminals do not use firearms on unarmed people you are either lieing or are seriously misinformed or uneducated. If a robber is casing two stores, one has an armed guard and the other doesn't which one will he choose to rob? If he knows one of the owners has a gun behind the counter and the other doesn't which one will he rob? Why do you people lack such simple logic skills? Do you seriously believe if guns are illegal robbers will stop using guns to rob convenient stores? Are you even listening to yourself?

They use a knife instead that's all

It take a couple of bigger balls no less.

Stop getting it into your head that everyone will have guns - if you really want a gun you'll get one.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#200 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

I'll say it again, the idea that guns make you safer is absurd. They don't. The higher the availability of guns, the more gun deaths there will be. Maybe in specific or individual cases they can protect, but if you look at the aggregate data, they don't. Countries that dont have accessible guns, have signficantly lower gun deaths. Now certainly that ignores a lot of other factors such as societal make up, etc, but the general point likely still stands.

But gun control isnt about whether they make you safer or not. It's about rights. There are lots of things that we do, that are bad for us and for others. At some point, we have to decide whether we want to be able to have that choice or have someone who "knows better" make it for us.

As a side note, these horrific sensational shootings are a negligible contribution to the number of gun deaths in the country per year. You'd have a similar chance of being killed by a shark attack, terrorist attack, or something along those lines. Most gun deaths happen in domestic violence, gang violence, etc. Most of the time the shooter knows the victim, and its not some random act of violence. Doesnt make it better, but perhaps gun control advocates should focus on that instead the rarer occurrences.