This topic is locked from further discussion.
Calling for blood is barbaric. We will see the repercussions soon enough.BranKetraI'm calling for the assassination of one person so the blood of many people and their families isn't spilled. Barbaric? Probably. Practical? Hell yes.
Snowden has stated that he has documents (possibly on one of the laptops he's supposed to have with him) with the names of intelligence assets in hostile nations. Revealing those names will get them (and potentially their families) killed. If killing Snowden saves those people from dying, the PR damage control will be a bargain.
I'm kind of hoping they catch Snowden. Yes, the NSA did all kinds of bad sh*t but they also did a lot of necessary counter-intelligence on China. Now that Snowden has leaked that information, the US is in a sincerely compromised position.
JustBeYourself
Please:roll: The US is far more corrupt than china has ever been and this man has simply shown the world the tip of the iceberg on how corrupt they are.
The country is only compromised by the fact they've been found out doin the bad things they shouldn't be.
I'm calling for the assassination of one person so the blood of many people and their families isn't spilled. Barbaric? Probably. Practical? Hell yes.[QUOTE="BranKetra"] Calling for blood is barbaric. We will see the repercussions soon enough.OrkHammer007
Snowden has stated that he has documents (possibly on one of the laptops he's supposed to have with him) with the names of intelligence assets in hostile nations. Revealing those names will get them (and potentially their families) killed. If killing Snowden saves those people from dying, the PR damage control will be a bargain.
I wonder how you'd treat him if he was from Iran or North Korea and was doing similar things?Please:roll: The US is far more corrupt than china has ever been and this man has simply shown the world the tip of the iceberg on how corrupt they are.If you really believe that the US is more corrupt than China has ever been, then put down the chronic and pull your head out. Do some research on China and their human rights record. Can't say I am shocked you would say what you just did. You can start with Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 and The Great Firewall of China.The country is only compromised by the fact they've been found out doin the bad things they shouldn't be.
l34052
Here are some names for you sir
Huang Qi
Gao Zhisheng
Chen Pokong
Tan Zuoren
Read on them, and if you still believe China isn't more corrupt than the US.....Than man up and shut up.
[QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]I'm calling for the assassination of one person so the blood of many people and their families isn't spilled. Barbaric? Probably. Practical? Hell yes.[QUOTE="BranKetra"] Calling for blood is barbaric. We will see the repercussions soon enough.Ace6301
Snowden has stated that he has documents (possibly on one of the laptops he's supposed to have with him) with the names of intelligence assets in hostile nations. Revealing those names will get them (and potentially their families) killed. If killing Snowden saves those people from dying, the PR damage control will be a bargain.
I wonder how you'd treat him if he was from Iran or North Korea and was doing similar things?If I was from NK or Iran, and he was ratting out my countrymen, I'd be saying the same thing.I wonder how you'd treat him if he was from Iran or North Korea and was doing similar things?If I was from NK or Iran, and he was ratting out my countrymen, I'd be saying the same thing. If you were still yourself and Snowden was instead ratting out NK, Iran or China how would you feel?[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]I'm calling for the assassination of one person so the blood of many people and their families isn't spilled. Barbaric? Probably. Practical? Hell yes.
Snowden has stated that he has documents (possibly on one of the laptops he's supposed to have with him) with the names of intelligence assets in hostile nations. Revealing those names will get them (and potentially their families) killed. If killing Snowden saves those people from dying, the PR damage control will be a bargain.
OrkHammer007
[QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]If I was from NK or Iran, and he was ratting out my countrymen, I'd be saying the same thing. If you were still yourself and Snowden was instead ratting out NK, Iran or China how would you feel?If someone were to defect to the US with sensitive info, I'd absolutely welcome them with open arms because they aren't my traitor, they're someone else's. I'd also fully expect their parnet nation to try to capture or kill them (much like the KGB did to Trotsky or Litvinenko), and be angry when they did. I see no problem with that.[QUOTE="Ace6301"] I wonder how you'd treat him if he was from Iran or North Korea and was doing similar things?Ace6301
If Snowden was from Canada, would you still be cheering him on? I doubt it.
If you were still yourself and Snowden was instead ratting out NK, Iran or China how would you feel?If someone were to defect to the US with sensitive info, I'd absolutely welcome them with open arms because they aren't my traitor, they're someone else's. I'd also fully expect their parnet nation to try to capture or kill them (much like the KGB did to Trotsky or Litvinenko), and be angry when they did. I see no problem with that.[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]If I was from NK or Iran, and he was ratting out my countrymen, I'd be saying the same thing.
OrkHammer007
If Snowden was from Canada, would you still be cheering him on? I doubt it.
Actually I would. Dude did a massive favour for your country.[QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]If someone were to defect to the US with sensitive info, I'd absolutely welcome them with open arms because they aren't my traitor, they're someone else's. I'd also fully expect their parnet nation to try to capture or kill them (much like the KGB did to Trotsky or Litvinenko), and be angry when they did. I see no problem with that.[QUOTE="Ace6301"] If you were still yourself and Snowden was instead ratting out NK, Iran or China how would you feel?Ace6301
If Snowden was from Canada, would you still be cheering him on? I doubt it.
Actually I would. Dude did a massive favour for your country. :lol: I know you are troll, but this is beyond moronic. All he has done is put secret agents lives at risk and damaged relations with the world. Favor my ass! :lol:Snowden has gone from whistleblower to traitor territory.BMD004Sadly the majority of everyone else including myself i see him as a hero and why a traitor? is it because GW Bush said it so?
[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]If someone were to defect to the US with sensitive info, I'd absolutely welcome them with open arms because they aren't my traitor, they're someone else's. I'd also fully expect their parnet nation to try to capture or kill them (much like the KGB did to Trotsky or Litvinenko), and be angry when they did. I see no problem with that.Actually I would. Dude did a massive favour for your country. :lol: I know you are troll, but this is beyond moronic. All he has done is put secret agents lives at risk and damaged relations with the world. Favor my ass! :lol: If you got caught cheating on your partner because a trusted friend informed him/her that you were going behind their back do you blame the friend or yourself? He outed that the US was going behind the backs of everyone, including its own countrymen. If my country was spying on me I'd very much like it to be outed for it.If Snowden was from Canada, would you still be cheering him on? I doubt it.
TheWalkingGhost
[QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]If someone were to defect to the US with sensitive info, I'd absolutely welcome them with open arms because they aren't my traitor, they're someone else's. I'd also fully expect their parnet nation to try to capture or kill them (much like the KGB did to Trotsky or Litvinenko), and be angry when they did. I see no problem with that.[QUOTE="Ace6301"] If you were still yourself and Snowden was instead ratting out NK, Iran or China how would you feel?Ace6301
If Snowden was from Canada, would you still be cheering him on? I doubt it.
Actually I would. Dude did a massive favour for your country. Dude.....you lost it.:([QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]If someone were to defect to the US with sensitive info, I'd absolutely welcome them with open arms because they aren't my traitor, they're someone else's. I'd also fully expect their parnet nation to try to capture or kill them (much like the KGB did to Trotsky or Litvinenko), and be angry when they did. I see no problem with that.Actually I would. Dude did a massive favour for your country. Dude.....you lost it.:( I'm sorry you'd rather kiss the ass of a government that spies on you instead of siding with the people who make up your country or the people who make up other countries. I'd say you lost it but you never had it.If Snowden was from Canada, would you still be cheering him on? I doubt it.
LJS9502_basic
If you got caught cheating on your partner because a trusted friend informed him/her that you were going behind their back do you blame the friend or yourself?Ace6301Poor comparison. You said Snowden did the US a favor, here my trusted friend ruined my relationship by ratting me out. The fall out of such a thing would be good for non involved. What if we were married and had 3 kids, the divorce would be a nightmare for all. There is a better way of dealing with this.
He outed that the US was going behind the backs of everyone, including its own countrymen. If my country was spying on me I'd very much like it to be outed for it.Ace6301He didn't out anybody, most of US already knew the government was spying on us. What he did damaged relations with other nations, leaked information terrorists can use to get around US methods and he has information on covert ops that could put peoples lives at risk. Not seeing the good.
Poor comparison. You said Snowden did the US a favor, here my trusted friend ruined my relationship by ratting me out. The fall out of such a thing would be good for non involved. What if we were married and had 3 kids, the divorce would be a nightmare for all. There is a better way of dealing with this.[QUOTE="Ace6301"] If you got caught cheating on your partner because a trusted friend informed him/her that you were going behind their back do you blame the friend or yourself?TheWalkingGhost
He outed that the US was going behind the backs of everyone, including its own countrymen. If my country was spying on me I'd very much like it to be outed for it.Ace6301He didn't out anybody, most of US already knew the government was spying on us. What he did damaged relations with other nations, leaked information terrorists can use to get around US methods and he has information on covert ops that could put peoples lives at risk. Not seeing the good. So you blame the friend. Alright then.
[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Dude.....you lost it.:(LJS9502_basicI'm sorry you'd rather kiss the ass of a government that spies on you instead of siding with the people who make up your country or the people who make up other countries. I'd say you lost it but you never had it.Oh for f*cks sake. If anyone is stupid enough not to know what is disseminated publicly can be seen...they are a fool. As for phone conversations.....they still need a judge to sign off to listen. This hysteria is ridiculous. And you were calling other people naive? Holy shit.
[QUOTE="TheWalkingGhost"]Poor comparison. You said Snowden did the US a favor, here my trusted friend ruined my relationship by ratting me out. The fall out of such a thing would be good for non involved. What if we were married and had 3 kids, the divorce would be a nightmare for all. There is a better way of dealing with this.[QUOTE="Ace6301"] If you got caught cheating on your partner because a trusted friend informed him/her that you were going behind their back do you blame the friend or yourself?Ace6301
He outed that the US was going behind the backs of everyone, including its own countrymen. If my country was spying on me I'd very much like it to be outed for it.Ace6301He didn't out anybody, most of US already knew the government was spying on us. What he did damaged relations with other nations, leaked information terrorists can use to get around US methods and he has information on covert ops that could put peoples lives at risk. Not seeing the good. So you blame the friend. Alright then. .........And you proven yet again how stupid you are. Do you have the ability to understand anything at all? :roll:
[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="TheWalkingGhost"]He didn't out anybody, most of US already knew the government was spying on us. What he did damaged relations with other nations, leaked information terrorists can use to get around US methods and he has information on covert ops that could put peoples lives at risk. Not seeing the good.TheWalkingGhostSo you blame the friend. Alright then. .........And you proven yet again how stupid you are. Do you have the ability to understand anything at all? :roll: "my trusted friend ruined my relationship..." "What he did..." Do you understand anything at all? Look at who you're blaming. You're removing blame from the one responsible for the actions that pissed everyone off and putting it on the guy who was honest enough to tell those who were being hurt by said actions.
He didn't out anybody, most of US already knew the government was spying on us. What he did damaged relations with other nations, leaked information terrorists can use to get around US methods and he has information on covert ops that could put peoples lives at risk. Not seeing the good.[QUOTE="Ace6301"]He outed that the US was going behind the backs of everyone, including its own countrymen. If my country was spying on me I'd very much like it to be outed for it.TheWalkingGhost
Sure I knew. But I am sure am glad I have confirmation.
Can't see the bad in it frankly.
He didn't out anybody, most of US already knew the government was spying on us. What he did damaged relations with other nations, leaked information terrorists can use to get around US methods and he has information on covert ops that could put peoples lives at risk. Not seeing the good.[QUOTE="TheWalkingGhost"]
[QUOTE="Ace6301"]He outed that the US was going behind the backs of everyone, including its own countrymen. If my country was spying on me I'd very much like it to be outed for it.m0zart
Sure I knew. But I am sure am glad I have confirmation.
Can't see the bad in it frankly.
You can't see the bad in putting lives at risk.:|[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Oh for f*cks sake. If anyone is stupid enough not to know what is disseminated publicly can be seen...they are a fool. As for phone conversations.....they still need a judge to sign off to listen. This hysteria is ridiculous.LJS9502_basicAnd you were calling other people naive? Holy shit. I have no illusions that the government can't find out information....but you have to be highly idiotic to think anyone is sitting around listening to everything going on all the time. They have key alerts they check. IF you aren't dealing with those particular targets....no one is paying attention. But hey...wear that tin foil proudly. You seem to be just like hartsick. I never said that everyone is listening all the time. Do you know how easy it is to get that warrant? It's almost never declined. Why does it even matter if no one is listening? They have the potential to do it and you're fine with that. Yes I've always known the US spied on its citizens but so what? I've always opposed that sort of thing and now that it's out in the open people are actually supporting those actions and that makes me sick.
You can't see the bad in putting lives at risk.:|LJS9502_basic
Nope... not really, and certainly not in comparison with the good that is done by allowing us to know, point blank and without debate, that we are in fact being spied on and that it is being done without the involvement of a single Court.
HEis not a good troll. It surprised me how people fall for that routine.LJS9502_basicLai has dedication at least, something both nibroc and ghost are sorely lacking in. On top of that Lai is actually less crazy than some well known Objectivists such as Leonard Peikoff (who is absolutely bat shit mind you, dude thinks physics doesn't work the way we think it does because it disagrees with a fiction novelists ideas)
and won't respond to you any further in any thread TheWalkingGhostYou said that last time too before you raged and deleted your posts.
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]You can't see the bad in putting lives at risk.:|m0zart
Nope... not really, and certainly not in comparison with the good that is done by allowing us to know, point blank and without debate, that we are in fact being spied on and that it is being done without the involvement of a single Court.
I always find bad in putting people lives at risk, which is why I might have not said anything unless me not saying anything would put peoples lives at risk.[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]You can't see the bad in putting lives at risk.:|m0zart
Nope... not really, and certainly not in comparison with the good that is done by allowing us to know, point blank and without debate, that we are in fact being spied on and that it is being done without the involvement of a single Court.
Hmm...according to what was released...they monitor specific calls to potential problems. According to the report...they have to get a judge to sign off on listening. They don't need a court to see who calls though. I don't see this being any different really to what it always was. Nor do I see reason for hysteria. Every thing you do has the potential to be monitored. But it's doubtful it is....[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]If someone were to defect to the US with sensitive info, I'd absolutely welcome them with open arms because they aren't my traitor, they're someone else's. I'd also fully expect their parnet nation to try to capture or kill them (much like the KGB did to Trotsky or Litvinenko), and be angry when they did. I see no problem with that.Actually I would. Dude did a massive favour for your country. :lol: I know you are troll, but this is beyond moronic. All he has done is put secret agents lives at risk and damaged relations with the world. Favor my ass! :lol: He informed the people of the world how the US was spying on American citizens. People have the right to knowIf Snowden was from Canada, would you still be cheering him on? I doubt it.
TheWalkingGhost
He didn't out anybody, most of US already knew the government was spying on us. What he did damaged relations with other nations, leaked information terrorists can use to get around US methods and he has information on covert ops that could put peoples lives at risk. Not seeing the good.[QUOTE="TheWalkingGhost"]
[QUOTE="Ace6301"]He outed that the US was going behind the backs of everyone, including its own countrymen. If my country was spying on me I'd very much like it to be outed for it.m0zart
Sure I knew. But I am sure am glad I have confirmation.
Can't see the bad in it frankly.
I had a feeling but I didn't have confirmation nor did I know exactly how they were doing it. Now I know.Would be cool to see an all out war between the EU and USA. No nukes allowed, just ground assaults and dogfights
[QUOTE="HyperWarlock"]Yeah because the deaths of thousands is always coolWould be cool to see an all out war between the EU and USA. No nukes allowed, just ground assaults and dogfights
EmpCom
I said it would be cool to see, I didn't say the outcome/implications would be cool.
Yeah because the deaths of thousands is always cool[QUOTE="EmpCom"][QUOTE="HyperWarlock"]
Would be cool to see an all out war between the EU and USA. No nukes allowed, just ground assaults and dogfights
HyperWarlock
I said it would be cool to see, I didn't say the outcome/implications would be cool.
Yeah heres a hair see if you can split itWell, not really. as quoted:[QUOTE="airshocker"]
We've effectively spit in our allies faces. It can only go down hill from here.
Hexagon_777
Only Canada, Australia, Britain and New Zealand were explicitly exempted from spy attacks.ReutersIf you speak English, you're fine, dude.damn anglo saxons.....
[QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]If someone were to defect to the US with sensitive info, I'd absolutely welcome them with open arms because they aren't my traitor, they're someone else's. I'd also fully expect their parnet nation to try to capture or kill them (much like the KGB did to Trotsky or Litvinenko), and be angry when they did. I see no problem with that.[QUOTE="Ace6301"] If you were still yourself and Snowden was instead ratting out NK, Iran or China how would you feel?Ace6301
If Snowden was from Canada, would you still be cheering him on? I doubt it.
Actually I would. Dude did a massive favour for your country. Had he stopped at merely revealing the domestic spying, he would have just been arrested and detained for trial. I highly doubt the US government, given the positive PR Snowden had received for his whistleblowing, would have done anything more drastic than thrown him in jail for a few years.However, he took it one step further and a.) Told the foreign press about the program, and b.) showed Germany documents showing that we were spying on everyone (something you are not supposed to know about, even if you "know" about it). This has seriously damaged foreign diplomatic relations, and will likely cause the US to change agents, communication protocols, etc. That's not my idea of "doing us a favor."
If Snowden had proved that Canada was spying on EU offices, would you so casually remark that he did Canada a favor? I'm sure the US wouldn't think so.
That doesn't make it okay. TBH....I don't really see the big deal. Everyone does it. Everyone knows it's being done to them. And they take precautions with sensitive information. And it's a bit hypocritical to pretend you've been wronged when you're doing it as well.[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]
[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]All countries "spy" if you want to use that word...well those with the capability. Like those in the EU.m0zart
It's a big enough deal that we jail and sometimes execute folks for doing it. Hell, we're trying to get Snowden right now for doing "what everybody does". It's weird to me how some are arguing that the US isn't so bad for spying while they're trying to crucify someone for... spying.
But that is the very nature of intelligence gathering. Despite the platitudes and political grandstanding, intelligence gathering between nations is inherently asymmetrical. It may not be strictly a zero-sum game, however intelligence leaks tend to diminish in proportion to a nation's intelligence gathering capability. Gathering intelligence on foreign nations and even foreign nationals is not alarming or even surprising. What is alarming as of late is the news that agencies of the executive branch have been spying on American citizens without judicial or constitutional justification.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment