[QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="Dantes_Monkey"][QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="Dantes_Monkey"] hiroshima, that was pretty damn bad. altrhough did effectively help end world war 2...which then lead right into the cold war >_Dantes_Monkey
I do wish they hadn't dropped the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, or more accurately I wish it hadn't been necessary. If only they could have just continued to firebomb the place into the stone age. It would have cost more Japanese lives, but at least the U.S. wouldn't be on record as the only nuclear aggressor on the planet.
explain the second bomb? the first was enough to show american superiority and end any war with japan.
The second bomb was a) because Japan didn't surrender after the 1st... and b) to prove that the first one wasn't a prototype, a unique "one-off."
still not sold buddy, but i do concede that i may not know everything about the incident. However, can you really justify the means by the ends?
Ive been to Hiroshima. I went to the museum. And that is exactly why the second bomb was dropped. The Japanese said so themselves.
And yes, I can justify the means. I mean, you add the word "nuclear" to anything and it becomes tainted but really...is it much worse than the alternative? These were the options:
1. Invade Japan, costing US and Japanese lives that would likely go to the millions (Japan was very much a bushido culture still, so surrender in the face of conventional warfare just wouldnt happen).
2. Keep firebombing. This is the worst, I actually wish they dropped the atom bomb earlier just to prevent this. But this would have kept occuring wel into the late 40s, devastating
3. Drop a couple atom bombs, shocking the Japanese into surrender.
And people think that Nagasaki and Hiroshima were just cities full of regular joes...they werent. Hiroshima was a military city. They produced weapons of war. The schools there were taken over by the military so kids would become soldiers and officers at age 15. It really was a valid target.
Log in to comment