WTF wikipedia posts imaginery pictures of Prophet Muhammad!!!

[QUOTE="Jandurin"]I don't see anything. What am I supposed to be looking at? Could you post a pic?Thinker_reborn

It's muhammad at the kaba.:|

I understand you have a different, more respectfull way of thinking. But it really isn't that big of a deal, honestly. it's comparable to making an imaginary image of the sun for a sun-worshiper. or an imaginary jesus picture. 

Not a big deal in the whole of things. It's only terrible from some peoples' POV.

It doesn't even show his face.

Did you even look at the source?

Yeah, cause there are a lot more where that came from

You know, the funny thing is that it's on Wikipedia. If he really cared that much, he could have taken the picture out awhile ago.yabbicoke

[QUOTE="Bloodbath_87"][QUOTE="xMOBSTER23x"]

I challenge God to a fight! And Muhammed. So he doesn't actually have a face...

xMOBSTER23x

Maybe Muhammad will...why don't you ask him... oh wait he has no ears

would you accept a fight challenge from a handicapped three year old?

[QUOTE="xMOBSTER23x"][QUOTE="Bloodbath_87"] I've challenged god to several fights, but he has yet to accept my challenge.superheromonkey

Maybe Muhammad will...why don't you ask him... oh wait he has no ears

would you accept a fight challenge from a handicapped three year old?

No but I'll bet Muhammad would 

wah wah wah they put a picture of mohammed.  if it is imaginary, no one should worry about it

This kind of reminds me of that episode of South Park...iMuffins

You're right, Family Guy must be taken off Wikipedia  :x

[QUOTE="Silverbond"]There's nothing wrong with that.Thinker_reborn

And we muslims just dont want any portrayed images of Muhammad.What's so wrong about it?

Wikipedia doesn't pander to religion, its about presenting fact. 

lol the picture looks like a 3rh grader drew it. So since they named the person muhammad (who has no face by the way), its still insanely offensive?

...the guy on the left is muhammad. Oh noes..

lol the picture looks like a 3rh grader drew it. So since they named the person muhammad (who has no face by the way), its still insanely offensive?

 

 

...the guy on the left is muhammad. Oh noes..

MetallicaKings

behead the child - all those who depict allah should be decapitated for being good at drawing - we are jealous!!!! 

Shouldn't they take it down then?

that drawing is made by someone by the people.

It makes sense.

this is the link to one who draw it.

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

If it was Jesus then it's ok.

Making fun of Christians is ok.

Posting a picture of Muhammad not ok! 

Funky_Llama

You know, the funny thing is that it's on Wikipedia. If he really cared that much, he could have taken the picture out awhile ago.yabbicoke

A quick look at the page shows that it is locked for editing.

[QUOTE="yabbicoke"]You know, the funny thing is that it's on Wikipedia. If he really cared that much, he could have taken the picture out awhile ago.Theokhoth

A quick look at the page shows that it is locked for editing.

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]

[QUOTE="yabbicoke"]You know, the funny thing is that it's on Wikipedia. If he really cared that much, he could have taken the picture out awhile ago.Funky_Llama

A quick look at the page shows that it is locked for editing.

I posted in my blog.;)

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"]

 

A quick look at the page shows that it is locked for editing.

Theokhoth

I posted in my blog.;)

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]

[QUOTE="yabbicoke"]You know, the funny thing is that it's on Wikipedia. If he really cared that much, he could have taken the picture out awhile ago.Funky_Llama

A quick look at the page shows that it is locked for editing.

A quick look at his most recent blog tells you.

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"]

 

A quick look at the page shows that it is locked for editing.

MetalGear_Ninty

A quick look at his most recent blog tells you.

Wow, if only I had gotten to him first.

Pics aren't offensive but you guys are being a holes towards Muslims and their faith. And stop taking shots at a dead guy, that's low.NoSpeakyEnglish

Pics aren't offensive but you guys are being a holes towards Muslims and their faith. And stop taking shots at a dead guy, that's low.NoSpeakyEnglish

[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]Ah, there you are. I demand that you tell me what your avatar is! :xTheokhoth

A quick look at his most recent blog tells you.

Wow, if only I had gotten to him first.

[QUOTE="NoSpeakyEnglish"]Pics aren't offensive but you guys are being a holes towards Muslims and their faith. And stop taking shots at a dead guy, that's low.Funky_Llama

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="NoSpeakyEnglish"]Pics aren't offensive but you guys are being a holes towards Muslims and their faith. And stop taking shots at a dead guy, that's low.NoSpeakyEnglish

[QUOTE="NoSpeakyEnglish"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]Pfft, like he cares. He's dead.Silverbond

[QUOTE="Silverbond"][QUOTE="NoSpeakyEnglish"] His family cares and guess what? I'm related to him. So seriously stop.NoSpeakyEnglish

Not one of those images (origial artifacts) appears to be made by anything other than middle-eastern/arab/Muslim hands.

That picture is lame. The Danish cartoon of Muhammad was much funnier, and better :D lol.CyberElite85

Because it was satire :lol:

Edit: Found a nice link to what it all boils down to. If you want a translation of what the drawings say, come to me :P

Not one of those images (origial artifacts) appears to be made by anything other than middle-eastern/arab/Muslim hands.

DigitalExile

[QUOTE="NoSpeakyEnglish"][QUOTE="Silverbond"]Your related to Muhammad? Then tellme, are you a Shi'a or Sunni/Sunna?Silverbond

[QUOTE="Silverbond"][QUOTE="NoSpeakyEnglish"]I'm actually nothing cuz I don't really believe that God is a good guy. And what does a persons faith have to do with being related to him or not? NoSpeakyEnglish

[QUOTE="NoSpeakyEnglish"][QUOTE="Silverbond"]Are you related to Muhammad, because any person related to him should know the answer. Ali or Abu Bakr?Silverbond

[QUOTE="superheromonkey"][QUOTE="xMOBSTER23x"]

 

Maybe Muhammad will...why don't you ask him... oh wait he has no ears

xMOBSTER23x

would you accept a fight challenge from a handicapped three year old?

No but I'll bet Muhammad would 

Well he did have a 9 year old wife, so I guess youre right. 

1. it's wikipedia, what do you expect?

2. honestly, do you think that this is the only page being defiled?

3. there are some people who hate muslims, and quite frankly, i believe it can be extremely justified in some cases. deal with it.

[QUOTE="xMOBSTER23x"][QUOTE="superheromonkey"]

would you accept a fight challenge from a handicapped three year old?

Taegukki

No but I'll bet Muhammad would

Well he did have a 9 year old wife, so I guess youre right.

1. it's wikipedia, what do you expect?

2. honestly, do you think that this is the only page being defiled?

3. there are some people who hate muslims, and quite frankly, i believe it can be extremely justified in some cases. deal with it.

mistervengeance

Hate can be extremely justified? Even when Islam is a pretty peaceful religion? Silverbond

Aren't most religions peaceful? :? 

1. it's wikipedia, what do you expect?

2. honestly, do you think that this is the only page being defiled?

3. there are some people who hate muslims, and quite frankly, i believe it can beextremely justified in some cases. deal with it.

mistervengeance

[QUOTE="DigitalExile"]

Not one of those images (origial artifacts) appears to be made by anything other than middle-eastern/arab/Muslim hands.

Silverbond

Not in the eighth century, honey.

[QUOTE="Silverbond"]Hate can be extremely justified? Even when Islam is a pretty peaceful religion? harashawn

Aren't most religions peaceful? :?