[QUOTE="Silverbond"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"] Yes. Yes I am. Because being an atheist back then was akin to modern-day lunacy. And even if there were atheists in that region back then, the depictions of Muhammad were not made by their hands.
Theokhoth
There are modern-day lunatics. Plenty of them. I'm going to need proof on that bold(or underlined in this case) inference.Lunacy can't be helped, but atheism can.
You can't prove a negative. You need to prove that there were Arab atheists back then. It shouldn't be too hard; if there were, surely you'd find one or two of their writings.
You would then need to prove that the atheists made the religious paintings.:lol:
I need you to break that down for me. I understand the rest and will do my best to find them but please explain the bold parts.In the 8th century, orthodox Islam reached the Fergana valley with the Uzbeks. Atheism, on the other hand, took some following in the northern regions under Russian communist influence.
^^^There's your proof of atheistic Arabs. I'll come back with the link later.
Log in to comment