All xbox 360 games for 2012, a complete list

[QUOTE="arkephonic"]

"[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

But PS3 has issues while you are in combat, which is a million times worst

A slow down in the fog doors is not critical, a slow down while fighting a huge boss is

360 version is better, just deal with it

LastRambo341

Allow me to try and penetrate the thick skull of LoosingEnds. It usually takes multiple times of proving him wrong to penetrate it.

Your source that you used to say that the 360 version of Dark Souls is better came to the conclusion that the PS3 version was better.

Wait a minute, read it again, let it penetrate your thick skull.....

Okay, now that it has seeped in a little, read the source you gave.

"In the final conclusion, image quality on both platforms is ostensibly identical, while performance is an apples and pears situation. Neither the 360 or PS3 version can definitively claim to have an absolute edge here, with Sony's machine taking volumetric effects in its stride, and Microsoft's handling destructible elements more convincingly. These are minor quibbles compared to the performance hit both consoles take in the face of particle effects and multiple enemies, however.

For the deciding vote, it's close enough for us to recommend either controller preference or the PS3 version's larger range of supported audio formats as more crucial points for consideration."

Oh who am I kidding, that didn't penetrate your thick skull. You're going to say something completely ridiculous now. It would take me posting this same thing at least 30 times before it penetrated your skull.

Do you always get this mad when sources prove you wrong? :lol:

A game is a game, true, duh, but that doesn't make them worth the time or money. Especially when PC has so many more indy titles that you can't even begin to compare.

Proof that sales don't mean a damn thing: Justin Beiber. I don't game for a popularity contest, or to be the cool kid on the block. I game to play quality games, something you lemmings have apparently forgotten all about.

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

again, how can you ignore the witcher 2 quality difference but brag about dark souls?

loosingENDS

Because i compare what we get at the 199$ price range obviously

Of course if you pay 100.000$ you can get a renderfarm and have better visuals, that is not the point

The point is what you can get best in 199$ range and without paying a single dollar in 6+ years

the only point thatneeds pointing out is that the pc version looks better. if you brag about a negligible difference between the 360 and the ps3, wtf are you doing bragging about a noticeableone?

[QUOTE="TheDarknesses"]Hey loosingEND's. What do you have against MMO's? loosingENDS

I tried to play both WOW and LOTR at some point

It was one of the worst and most unfullfilling gaming epxeriences in my life

Coming from adventures, deep complex RPGs, the simplistic nature of MMO story, world design etc was laughable for me

I hate generic games like White Knight, FF13, AMalur too that resemble the generic world of a MMO, not only MMOs

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

again, how can you ignore the witcher 2 quality difference but brag about dark souls?

CaseyWegner

Because i compare what we get at the 199$ price range obviously

Of course if you pay 100.000$ you can get a renderfarm and have better visuals, that is not the point

The point is what you can get best in 199$ range and without paying a single dollar in 6+ years

the only point thatneeds pointing out is that the pc version looks better. if you brag about a negligible difference between the 360 and the ps3, wtf are you doing bragging about a noticeableone?

I just answered that, it is the context that counts

Is it bad that I think nothing on that list interests me, or I can play it on another console or on my PC? Am I the only one that thinks this currently announced and known lineup looks awful? I mean really...

You do know there are different kinds of MMO's right?TheDarknesses

I mainly play RPGs, so i dont care about anything else really

[QUOTE="arkephonic"]Allow me to penetrate LoosingEnds. It usually takes multiple times to penetrate.LastRambo341

What else is new about SW?

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

I tried to play both WOW and LOTR at some point

It was one of the worst and most unfullfilling gaming epxeriences in my life

Coming from adventures, deep complex RPGs, the simplistic nature of MMO story, world design etc was laughable for me

I hate generic games like White Knight, FF13, AMalur too that resemble the generic world of a MMO, not only MMOs

loosingENDS

how much time did you give them?

About 15 hours in LOTR, 10 of which was killing small dog like creatures

But frankly, the way the world looked like, i would rather replay a real RPG like Dark SOuls in eternity than play any MMO

what class/race did you play? and what about wow?

[QUOTE="arkephonic"]

"[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

But PS3 has issues while you are in combat, which is a million times worst

A slow down in the fog doors is not critical, a slow down while fighting a huge boss is

360 version is better, just deal with it

LastRambo341

Allow me to try and penetrate the thick skull of LoosingEnds. It usually takes multiple times of proving him wrong to penetrate it.

Your source that you used to say that the 360 version of Dark Souls is better came to the conclusion that the PS3 version was better.

Wait a minute, read it again, let it penetrate your thick skull.....

Okay, now that it has seeped in a little, read the source you gave.

"In the final conclusion, image quality on both platforms is ostensibly identical, while performance is an apples and pears situation. Neither the 360 or PS3 version can definitively claim to have an absolute edge here, with Sony's machine taking volumetric effects in its stride, and Microsoft's handling destructible elements more convincingly. These are minor quibbles compared to the performance hit both consoles take in the face of particle effects and multiple enemies, however.

For the deciding vote, it's close enough for us to recommend either controller preference or the PS3 version's larger range of supported audio formats as more crucial points for consideration."

Oh who am I kidding, that didn't penetrate your thick skull. You're going to say something completely ridiculous now. It would take me posting this same thing at least 30 times before it penetrated your skull.

Is it bad that I think nothing on that list interests me, or I can play it on another console or on my PC? Am I the only one that thinks this currently announced and known lineup looks awful? I mean really...

-Karmum-

Well, not everyone has a gaming PC to play Witcher 2, you are not alone on this planet you know

Plus Halo is one of the best shooter series of all time, not liking it does not mean wont be amazing and huge

Panzer Dragoon was huge too

Dust ELysian Tale looks stunning to me and is only on XBLA

etc

So, which games you dont like of those and why ? Because frankly i think you are just trolling

A game is a game, true, duh, but that doesn't make them worth the time or money. Especially when PC has so many more indy titles that you can't even begin to compare.

Proof that sales don't mean a damn thing: Justin Beiber. I don't game for a popularity contest, or to be the cool kid on the block. I game to play quality games, something you lemmings have apparently forgotten all about.

what class/race did you play? and what about wow?

CaseyWegner

I dont recal the class names in either, i played WOW so many years back too

I played mage in both though, that is for sure, i recall throwing a projectile spell in LOTR with some lock on feature it had

[QUOTE="LastRambo341"][QUOTE="arkephonic"]

Allow me to try and penetrate the thick skull of LoosingEnds. It usually takes multiple times of proving him wrong to penetrate it.

Your source that you used to say that the 360 version of Dark Souls is better came to the conclusion that the PS3 version was better.

Wait a minute, read it again, let it penetrate your thick skull.....

Okay, now that it has seeped in a little, read the source you gave.

"In the final conclusion, image quality on both platforms is ostensibly identical, while performance is an apples and pears situation. Neither the 360 or PS3 version can definitively claim to have an absolute edge here, with Sony's machine taking volumetric effects in its stride, and Microsoft's handling destructible elements more convincingly. These are minor quibbles compared to the performance hit both consoles take in the face of particle effects and multiple enemies, however.

For the deciding vote, it's close enough for us to recommend either controller preference or the PS3 version's larger range of supported audio formats as more crucial points for consideration."

Oh who am I kidding, that didn't penetrate your thick skull. You're going to say something completely ridiculous now. It would take me posting this same thing at least 30 times before it penetrated your skull.

arkephonic

Do you always get this mad when sources prove you wrong? :lol:

And a brand new 360 teaser for Witcher 2, enjoy :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJiMtPzY568&feature

Much better than anyone would epxect for sure

loosingENDS

It may not look as good as it does on an high end PC, but 360 is about to get a fantastic game!

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Because i compare what we get at the 199$ price range obviously

Of course if you pay 100.000$ you can get a renderfarm and have better visuals, that is not the point

The point is what you can get best in 199$ range and without paying a single dollar in 6+ years

loosingENDS

the only point thatneeds pointing out is that the pc version looks better. if you brag about a negligible difference between the 360 and the ps3, wtf are you doing bragging about a noticeableone?

I just answered that, it is the context that counts

no it isn't. if somebody has a 360 and a gaming pc, why the hell would they care how much they initially paid for their system when deciding what version to get?

[QUOTE="arkephonic"]

[QUOTE="LastRambo341"] So instead of attacking his argument, you attack HIM personally. What a lousy debater.LastRambo341

Do you always get this mad when sources prove you wrong? :lol:

Aren't you his puppet that stands by his side like a girlfriend?

Goes into thread.

Sees it's a loosingENDS thread.

Types comment.

Leaves.

Hey OP you forgot some games

Skulls of the Shogun

Fire Pro-Wrestling

Double Fine Happy Action Theater (its out now)

The Splatters

[QUOTE="LastRambo341"][QUOTE="arkephonic"]

Do you always get this mad when sources prove you wrong? :lol:

arkephonic

Aren't you his puppet that stands by his side like a girlfriend?

[QUOTE="-Karmum-"]

Is it bad that I think nothing on that list interests me, or I can play it on another console or on my PC? Am I the only one that thinks this currently announced and known lineup looks awful? I mean really...

loosingENDS

Well, not everyone has a gaming PC to play Witcher 2, you are not alone on this planet you know

Plus Halo is one of the best shooter series of all time, not liking it does not mean wont be amazing and huge

Panzer Dragoon was huge too

Dust ELysian Tale looks stunning to me and is only on XBLA

etc

So, which games you dont like of those and why ? Because frankly i think you are just trolling

Yeah, I'm the troll. Let's begin.

Ryse? Okay made by Crytek could be interesting.

Fable Journey (with Kinect)? Both Fable II and III left bad tastes in my mouth, sorry if I'm not too excited.

Crimson Dracon (with Kinect)? Could be interesting, need more information.

Halo 4? Not interested, at all.

Dust Elysian Tale and Haunt? What?

Star Wars (with Kinect I assume). Uh, cool, I guess...

Steel Batallion? They're remaking it for the Kinect after that $200 monstrosity bundle? Awesome, not really.

Alan Wake American Nightmare? Okay, didn't really like the original but it should be on the list.

Trials Evolution? I liked Trials HD, can't complain.

The other x amount of games? Not interested

Played the better version of Witcher 2 already, and own the best version of Minecraft. Exclusive Skyrim DLC is nice I guess and Kinect features for Mass Effect 3? Okay, cool...

I really can't be bothered to list everything else you listed because I'm that disinterested in it. No I'm not trolling, I actually do own all three consoles but I just think the lineup (in my opinion) is awful. Don't accuse somebody of trolling that doesn't follow your opinion, it makes you an idiot. An idiot that cannot spell properly.

I just don't want Kinect games, I'm completely uninterested in Kinect games and that's most of what you listed: Kinect games. I'll pass.

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

the only point thatneeds pointing out is that the pc version looks better. if you brag about a negligible difference between the 360 and the ps3, wtf are you doing bragging about a noticeableone?

CaseyWegner

I just answered that, it is the context that counts

no it isn't. if somebody has a 360 and a gaming pc, why the hell would they care how much they initially paid for their system when deciding what version to get?

That is the problem, not everyone has or needs a gamign PC, when he can get a 199$ 360 and play everything

It is my opinion that PC has way more Indy Games? Really? You can't possibly be dumb enough to believe that, can you?

For the one who's been doing the most whining over insults, you sure do a great job when you have no valid argument. Do facts really make you that butthurt? It's not my fault that you have nothing decent worth playing.

[QUOTE="LastRambo341"] 1) False. Kinect works extremely well, especially when games use it well like Gunstringer and Dance Central. You're just using typical "hardcore gamer" false criticisms :lol: 2) That is your inferior opinion 3) You're stupid. Sales don't equal quality, but they equal the winner and make you more relevant. Since Sony keeps on pumping out exclusives after exclusives, none of them sell so successfully. So then they won't work hard as much then YOU will get screwed. Go back to school and learn economics/business.Damnsmooth

It is my opinion that PC has way more Indy Games? Really? You can't possibly be dumb enough to believe that, can you?

For the one who's been doing the most whining over insults, you sure do a great job when you have no valid argument. Do facts really make you that butthurt? It's not my fault that you have nothing decent worth playing.

Kinect is fine, works great in Gunstringer and Haunt games, they are actualy both very fun and great titles

But keep the trolling, someone may be persuded into thinking Kinect is bad eventually, some 5 years old kid perhaps

Dance Central. Hahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Damnsmooth

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

I just answered that, it is the context that counts

loosingENDS

no it isn't. if somebody has a 360 and a gaming pc, why the hell would they care how much they initially paid for their system when deciding what version to get?

That is the problem, not everyone has or needs a gamign PC, when he can get a 199$ 360 and play everything

[QUOTE="arkephonic"]

[QUOTE="LastRambo341"] Me? You're "debating" with LoosingEnds, what sources?LastRambo341

Aren't you his puppet that stands by his side like a girlfriend?

Well this just goes to show that you haven't even been reading and / or comprehending anything that's been going on this thread, which I had expected.

In case you hadn't noticed, LoosingEnds was using Digital Foundry to support his argument that Dark Souls was better on 360 than its PS3 counterpart, in which I used his own source against him, as Digital Foundry came to the conclusion in their article that although the 2 versions are nearly identical, he gives the edge to the PS3 because of the "PS3 version's larger range of supported audio formats as more crucial points for consideration".

Meanwhile, I just figured that you were here as his support or his girlfriend, because while he is arguing with people, you're not contributing anything to the thread other than, "Yeah LooseEnds yeah! Totally, you show them LooseEnds! Good points LooseEnds! I totally agree, LooseEnds"!

You probably don't even know what is going on here, :lol:

[QUOTE="Damnsmooth"][QUOTE="LastRambo341"] 1) False. Kinect works extremely well, especially when games use it well like Gunstringer and Dance Central. You're just using typical "hardcore gamer" false criticisms :lol: 2) That is your inferior opinion 3) You're stupid. Sales don't equal quality, but they equal the winner and make you more relevant. Since Sony keeps on pumping out exclusives after exclusives, none of them sell so successfully. So then they won't work hard as much then YOU will get screwed. Go back to school and learn economics/business.loosingENDS

It is my opinion that PC has way more Indy Games? Really? You can't possibly be dumb enough to believe that, can you?

For the one who's been doing the most whining over insults, you sure do a great job when you have no valid argument. Do facts really make you that butthurt? It's not my fault that you have nothing decent worth playing.

Kinect is fine, works great in Gunstringer and Haunt games, they are actualy both very fun and great titles

But keep the trolling, someone may be persuded into thinking Kinect is bad eventually, some 5 years old kid perhaps

[QUOTE="Damnsmooth"] Dance Central. Hahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Badosh

It is my opinion that PC has way more Indy Games? Really? You can't possibly be dumb enough to believe that, can you?

For the one who's been doing the most whining over insults, you sure do a great job when you have no valid argument. Do facts really make you that butthurt? It's not my fault that you have nothing decent worth playing.

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

no it isn't. if somebody has a 360 and a gaming pc, why the hell would they care how much they initially paid for their system when deciding what version to get?

MonsieurX

That is the problem, not everyone has or needs a gamign PC, when he can get a 199$ 360 and play everything

I dont game online, so i wouldnt know

[QUOTE="LastRambo341"][QUOTE="arkephonic"]

Aren't you his puppet that stands by his side like a girlfriend?

arkephonic

Well this just goes to show that you haven't even been reading and / or comprehending anything that's been going on this thread, which I had expected.

In case you hadn't noticed, LoosingEnds was using Digital Foundry to support his argument that Dark Souls was better on 360 than its PS3 counterpart, in which I used his own source against him, as Digital Foundry came to the conclusion in their article that although the 2 versions are nearly identical, he gives the edge to the PS3 because of the "PS3 version's larger range of supported audio formats as more crucial points for consideration".

Meanwhile, I just figured that you were here as his support or his girlfriend, because while he is arguing with people, you're not contributing anything to the thread other than, "Yeah LooseEnds yeah! Totally, you show them LooseEnds! Good points LooseEnds! I totally agree, LooseEnds"!

You probably don't even know what is going on here, :lol:

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

I just answered that, it is the context that counts

loosingENDS

no it isn't. if somebody has a 360 and a gaming pc, why the hell would they care how much they initially paid for their system when deciding what version to get?

That is the problem, not everyone has or needs a gamign PC, when he can get a 199$ 360 and play everything

and not everybody has or needs a 360. the pc has more high scoring exclusives than all three consoles combined so stop spouting this "and play everything" nonsense and stop using your own very rare personal opinion as your reasons for saying so. the world does not revolve around you. noteverybody cares about the same games as you do.

[QUOTE="LastRambo341"][QUOTE="arkephonic"]

Aren't you his puppet that stands by his side like a girlfriend?

arkephonic

Well this just goes to show that you haven't even been reading and / or comprehending anything that's been going on this thread, which I had expected.

In case you hadn't noticed, LoosingEnds was using Digital Foundry to support his argument that Dark Souls was better on 360 than its PS3 counterpart, in which I used his own source against him, as Digital Foundry came to the conclusion in their article that although the 2 versions are nearly identical, he gives the edge to the PS3 because of the "PS3 version's larger range of supported audio formats as more crucial points for consideration".

Meanwhile, I just figured that you were here as his support or his girlfriend, because while he is arguing with people, you're not contributing anything to the thread other than, "Yeah LooseEnds yeah! Totally, you show them LooseEnds! Good points LooseEnds! I totally agree, LooseEnds"!

You probably don't even know what is going on here, :lol:

Well, for me slow downs while fighting bosses is more citical than better sound effects, most definatly

PS3 has slow downs while in combat, that is the worst thing that could happen to a game imo, far worst than a bit bigger sound compression for sure

[QUOTE="MonsieurX"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

That is the problem, not everyone has or needs a gamign PC, when he can get a 199$ 360 and play everything

loosingENDS

I dont game online, so i wouldnt know

Nothing, if you're in to the casual revolution. If you're not, everything.Damnsmooth

Some baby powder might help that butthurt though, look in to it.

works great in Gunstringer and Haunt games, they are actualy both very fun and great titlesloosingENDS

Well, for me slow downs while fighting bosses is more citical than better sound effects, most definatly

PS3 has slow downs while in combat, that is the worst thing that could happen to a game imo, far worst than a bit bigger sound compression for sureloosingENDS

Fact of the matter is, Digital Foundry chalked up Dark Souls as a win for PS3, regardless of how minimal their reasoning may be. They attributed their reasoning to the "PS3 version's larger range of supported audio formats as more crucial points for consideration."

They said the graphical differences are not worth choosing one over the other, stating "image quality on both platforms is ostensibly identical, while performance is an apples and pears situation. Neither the 360 or PS3 version can definitively claim to have an absolute edge here, with Sony's machine taking volumetric effects in its stride, and Microsoft's handling destructible elements more convincingly."

I'm not the one that brought up Digital Foundry, LooseEnds, you did. Your opinion on the matter is literally worthless.

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]works great in Gunstringer and Haunt games, they are actualy both very fun and great titlesHeil68

[QUOTE="arkephonic"]

[QUOTE="LastRambo341"] LOL :lol:, sorry bud, but facts are facts, and valid points are valid points :lol: You're telling me this when you have several lackeys acting like your girlriends? ;)loosingENDS

Well this just goes to show that you haven't even been reading and / or comprehending anything that's been going on this thread, which I had expected.

In case you hadn't noticed, LoosingEnds was using Digital Foundry to support his argument that Dark Souls was better on 360 than its PS3 counterpart, in which I used his own source against him, as Digital Foundry came to the conclusion in their article that although the 2 versions are nearly identical, he gives the edge to the PS3 because of the "PS3 version's larger range of supported audio formats as more crucial points for consideration".

Meanwhile, I just figured that you were here as his support or his girlfriend, because while he is arguing with people, you're not contributing anything to the thread other than, "Yeah LooseEnds yeah! Totally, you show them LooseEnds! Good points LooseEnds! I totally agree, LooseEnds"!

You probably don't even know what is going on here, :lol:

Well, for me slow downs while fighting bosses is more citical than better sound effects, most definatly

PS3 has slow downs while in combat, that is the worst thing that could happen to a game imo, far worst than a bit bigger sound compression for sure

both versions have slowdown during combat. the difference, as stated by the source you used, is negligible.

[QUOTE="Damnsmooth"]Nothing, if you're in to the casual revolution. If you're not, everything.Badosh

[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]works great in Gunstringer and Haunt games, they are actualy both very fun and great titlesLastRambo341

it's from a source he listens to.

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

New Crimson Dragon pic

http://playxbla.com/playxbla-exclusive-crimson-dragon-screenshots/

tenaka2

Why would you post a screen shot that looks that bad?

Most of those games you listed are Kinect and multiplats, I mean it's like your not even trying to....*sigh* you know what? I'm too tired to deal with this, you have fun with your list of Kinect and multiplats and uhh...Halo 4. It's not worth my time anymore tryng to deal with you.

ShadowMoses900

[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]works great in Gunstringer and Haunt games, they are actualy both very fun and great titlesLastRambo341

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="arkephonic"]

Well this just goes to show that you haven't even been reading and / or comprehending anything that's been going on this thread, which I had expected.

In case you hadn't noticed, LoosingEnds was using Digital Foundry to support his argument that Dark Souls was better on 360 than its PS3 counterpart, in which I used his own source against him, as Digital Foundry came to the conclusion in their article that although the 2 versions are nearly identical, he gives the edge to the PS3 because of the "PS3 version's larger range of supported audio formats as more crucial points for consideration".

Meanwhile, I just figured that you were here as his support or his girlfriend, because while he is arguing with people, you're not contributing anything to the thread other than, "Yeah LooseEnds yeah! Totally, you show them LooseEnds! Good points LooseEnds! I totally agree, LooseEnds"!

You probably don't even know what is going on here, :lol:

CaseyWegner

Well, for me slow downs while fighting bosses is more citical than better sound effects, most definatly

PS3 has slow downs while in combat, that is the worst thing that could happen to a game imo, far worst than a bit bigger sound compression for sure

both versions have slowdown during combat. the difference, as stated by the source you used, is negligible.

They said PS3 drops to 10fps during boss fights when physics are involved, so that is not negligible at all, it is crucial