Arguing against PC = POINTLESS

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#251 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts

[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

Lol CoD 4 looks nothing close to Stalker complete mod.

The lighting and shadows in Stalker are some of the best.

Stalker even looks better in motion.

It's in my list of best looking games that easily surpass anything on consoles.

Nyuuuu

Haha I already predicted the "lighting" response, because thats the only thing STALKER had unique over consoles... and like I said, what good is lighting in the long run? paints a slightly prettier picture... but its not the overall games "whoaness"

Well that's you. I showed my brother who owns a Ps3 and Uncharted 2, Shadow Of Chernoybl with the Lurk mod and asked him what looked better, and he just laughed at me and said Stalker. :|

Technically it is, theres no disputing that, but im asking whats the point in bragging about technical ALL THE FRIGGIN TIME, when most PC Developers dont even take good advantage of it, just throw it in to what otherwise is a bland looking game.
Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#252 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

[QUOTE="Birdy09"] Why am I not suprized. I guess you need to play both games then, but youd probably be too stubborn to admit it. I mean look at the screens posted above? some are decent, the bottom one looks no better than the CoD 4 Chernobyl level and im suppose to be impressed by these because they are zoomed out?

Birdy09

Lol CoD 4 looks nothing close to Stalker complete mod.

The lighting and shadows in Stalker are some of the best.

Stalker even looks better in motion.

It's in my list of best looking games that easily surpass anything on consoles.

Haha I already predicted the "lighting" response, because thats the only thing STALKER had unique over consoles... and like I said, what good is lighting in the long run? paints a slightly prettier picture... but its not the overall games "whoaness"

I thought Uncharted 2 look ok but nothing great.

It used small rooms and the textures were pretty low res in some areas.

It's looks even worse in multiplayer mod.

Stalker looks awesome and lighting and shadows is one of the most important things in visuals.

Ask any experienced artist and they will tell you this.

Stalker especially looks awesome when you are looking at a lightning storm. When it strike the light must bounce off all objects and create shadows for each one.

Console do not have the power to handle a lot of these features so they opt out with low draw distance, low LOD, low textures, less objects and players on screen etc. etc.

Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#253 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts

[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="AtariKidX"]

Uncharted 2: Among Thieves

....and again it look a lot better on HDTV.It is really good to see that only Crysis looks better than U2 and GoW3.8)

Nyuuuu

While I disagree, to some extent, I aslo agree. Too much enpahsis on PC graphics, yes multiplats looks better, crisper and smoother framerates. but what good is games like STALKER and METROS DX11 effects when the games barely have the production values to support the echnology, absolutely pointless. Im a hermit here, thats no secret, but im yet to be impressed by anything on my PC over Uncharted 2. humbles you abit. Crysis looks better, but I was never "whoa'd" by any of that bland uninspired empty game.

Please don't tell me you're talking about Stalker? Uncharted ... a game that rips off EVERY other game, and copies pretty much everything from Indiana Jones, and you're calling Stalker a bland uninspired game? Wtf.. I just died a little inside. :(

well sorry but when I load up STALKERCoP for the first im to e dropped into a field that looked like it could of been done in 2004 and knowing that is the majority of the map bar certain places I have no reason to say otherwise. Technical graphic power is very very OFTEN wasted and pointless to brag about, you 3 seem to be missing this simple point.
Avatar image for Nyuuuu
Nyuuuu

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#254 Nyuuuu
Member since 2010 • 380 Posts

[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"]

[QUOTE="Birdy09"] Haha I already predicted the "lighting" response, because thats the only thing STALKER had unique over consoles... and like I said, what good is lighting in the long run? paints a slightly prettier picture... but its not the overall games "whoaness"Birdy09

Well that's you. I showed my brother who owns a Ps3 and Uncharted 2, Shadow Of Chernoybl with the Lurk mod and asked him what looked better, and he just laughed at me and said Stalker. :|

Technically it is, theres no disputing that, but im asking whats the point in bragging about technical ALL THE FRIGGIN TIME, when most PC Developers dont even take good advantage of it, just throw it in to what otherwise is a bland looking game.

Stalker.. bland? What the **** are you talking about? No other game offers the desolate, gritty atmosphere and envoirements Stalker offers. Stalkers main selling point is it's immersive atmosphere. I'm not 12. I don't want to pretend I'm Indiana Jones in some cheesy childish Hollywood blockbuster. :roll:

Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#255 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

[QUOTE="AtariKidX"]

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]

That's not bad quality, that's 720p.

This is bad quality:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPi0AhQgrDs

And it still looks better, fancy that.

loadedboon

Uncharted 2: Among Thieves

....and again it look a lot better on HDTV.It is really good to see that only Crysis looks better than U2 and GoW3.8)

Metro 2033, ARMA2, Mafia 2, Stalker games, ME games on PC etc all look better then U2 and GOW3

You forgot other games like Total War.

There is quite a large list of PC games that look better than anything on consoles.And yes I am arguing technically, otherwise it would be subjective.

Avatar image for Nyuuuu
Nyuuuu

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#256 Nyuuuu
Member since 2010 • 380 Posts

[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"]

[QUOTE="Birdy09"] While I disagree, to some extent, I aslo agree. Too much enpahsis on PC graphics, yes multiplats looks better, crisper and smoother framerates. but what good is games like STALKER and METROS DX11 effects when the games barely have the production values to support the echnology, absolutely pointless. Im a hermit here, thats no secret, but im yet to be impressed by anything on my PC over Uncharted 2. humbles you abit. Crysis looks better, but I was never "whoa'd" by any of that bland uninspired empty game.Birdy09

Please don't tell me you're talking about Stalker? Uncharted ... a game that rips off EVERY other game, and copies pretty much everything from Indiana Jones, and you're calling Stalker a bland uninspired game? Wtf.. I just died a little inside. :(

well sorry but when I load up STALKERCoP for the first im to e dropped into a field that looked like it could of been done in 2004 and knowing that is the majority of the map bar certain places I have no reason to say otherwise. Technical graphic power is very very OFTEN wasted and pointless to brag about, you 3 seem to be missing this simple point.

I admit Call Of Pripyats enviroments were abit meh, but Shadow Of Chernoybl? No world has come close to that imo.

Avatar image for loadedboon
loadedboon

1986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#257 loadedboon
Member since 2004 • 1986 Posts

[QUOTE="loadedboon"]

[QUOTE="AtariKidX"]

Uncharted 2: Among Thieves

....and again it look a lot better on HDTV.It is really good to see that only Crysis looks better than U2 and GoW3.8)

Hakkai007

Metro 2033, ARMA2, Mafia 2, Stalker games, ME games on PC etc all look better then U2 and GOW3

You forgot other games like Total War.

There is quite a large list of PC games that look better than anything on consoles.And yes I am arguing technically, otherwise it would be subjective.

I said etc. I could have named more from the top of my head but he's jut gonna deny it anyway so why bother naming them all? :)

Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#258 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts

[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="Nyuuuu"]

Well that's you. I showed my brother who owns a Ps3 and Uncharted 2, Shadow Of Chernoybl with the Lurk mod and asked him what looked better, and he just laughed at me and said Stalker. :|

Nyuuuu

Technically it is, theres no disputing that, but im asking whats the point in bragging about technical ALL THE FRIGGIN TIME, when most PC Developers dont even take good advantage of it, just throw it in to what otherwise is a bland looking game.

Stalker.. bland? What the **** are you talking about? No other game offers the desolate, gritty atmosphere and envoirements Stalker offers. Stalkers main selling point is it's immersive atmosphere. I'm not 12. I don't want to pretend I'm Indiana Jones in some cheesy childish Hollywood blockbuster. :roll:

The atosphere was no different from many other post-apocolyptic games with some exceptions. hell Doom 3 had more atmosphere, and dead space, I enjoyed stalker. but please, dont pretend like the game is the most techincailly impressive thing that cant be done elsewhere.... most of the underground sections were impressive, not much else was. Im 22.... I dont pretend to be anything, hell, its the same old crap, now im pretending im a godamn russian stalker in a field im suppose to feel more mature because its all brown? filled with AI beats that i can knife to death without ever getting hit... constantly. Im not debating STALKER as a good game, im refering to techinical graphics and its lackluster use.
Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#259 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"]

[QUOTE="Birdy09"] While I disagree, to some extent, I aslo agree. Too much enpahsis on PC graphics, yes multiplats looks better, crisper and smoother framerates. but what good is games like STALKER and METROS DX11 effects when the games barely have the production values to support the echnology, absolutely pointless. Im a hermit here, thats no secret, but im yet to be impressed by anything on my PC over Uncharted 2. humbles you abit. Crysis looks better, but I was never "whoa'd" by any of that bland uninspired empty game.Birdy09

Please don't tell me you're talking about Stalker? Uncharted ... a game that rips off EVERY other game, and copies pretty much everything from Indiana Jones, and you're calling Stalker a bland uninspired game? Wtf.. I just died a little inside. :(

well sorry but when I load up STALKERCoP for the first im to e dropped into a field that looked like it could of been done in 2004 and knowing that is the majority of the map bar certain places I have no reason to say otherwise. Technical graphic power is very very OFTEN wasted and pointless to brag about, you 3 seem to be missing this simple point.

So let me get this straight, you played the third game in the stalker series without playing the first?

Once you play the first it makes a lot more sense. It takes some time before you find a friendly camp in the 3rd but you are given object in exploring crash sites.

Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#260 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"]

[QUOTE="Birdy09"] Technically it is, theres no disputing that, but im asking whats the point in bragging about technical ALL THE FRIGGIN TIME, when most PC Developers dont even take good advantage of it, just throw it in to what otherwise is a bland looking game.Birdy09

Stalker.. bland? What the **** are you talking about? No other game offers the desolate, gritty atmosphere and envoirements Stalker offers. Stalkers main selling point is it's immersive atmosphere. I'm not 12. I don't want to pretend I'm Indiana Jones in some cheesy childish Hollywood blockbuster. :roll:

The atosphere was no different from many other post-apocolyptic games with some exceptions. hell Doom 3 had more atmosphere, and dead space, I enjoyed stalker. but please, dont pretend like the game is the most techincailly impressive thing that cant be done elsewhere.... most of the underground sections were impressive, not much else was. Im 22.... I dont pretend to be anything, hell, its the same old crap, now im pretending im a godamn russian stalker in a field im suppose to feel more mature because its all brown? filled with AI beats that i can knife to death without ever getting hit... constantly. Im not debating STALKER as a good game, im refering to techinical graphics and its lackluster use.

You never did play the first stalker did you?

Avatar image for loadedboon
loadedboon

1986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#261 loadedboon
Member since 2004 • 1986 Posts

[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"]

[QUOTE="Birdy09"] Technically it is, theres no disputing that, but im asking whats the point in bragging about technical ALL THE FRIGGIN TIME, when most PC Developers dont even take good advantage of it, just throw it in to what otherwise is a bland looking game.Birdy09

Stalker.. bland? What the **** are you talking about? No other game offers the desolate, gritty atmosphere and envoirements Stalker offers. Stalkers main selling point is it's immersive atmosphere. I'm not 12. I don't want to pretend I'm Indiana Jones in some cheesy childish Hollywood blockbuster. :roll:

The atosphere was no different from many other post-apocolyptic games with some exceptions. hell Doom 3 had more atmosphere, and dead space, I enjoyed stalker. but please, dont pretend like the game is the most techincailly impressive thing that cant be done elsewhere.... most of the underground sections were impressive, not much else was. Im 22.... I dont pretend to be anything, hell, its the same old crap, now im pretending im a godamn russian stalker in a field im suppose to feel more mature because its all brown? filled with AI beats that i can knife to death without ever getting hit... constantly. Im not debating STALKER as a good game, im refering to techinical graphics and its lackluster use.

Are you saying a PS3 or 360 is capable of running Stalker? :lol:

Avatar image for Nyuuuu
Nyuuuu

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#262 Nyuuuu
Member since 2010 • 380 Posts

I love how everyone praises Uncharted 2s animations, yet Drake always seems to hover for a few seconds when he's about to drop from a ledge. :lol:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdN9Bub58no Watch from 35 seconds.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oG0ZHRfvdlg Watch from 45 seconds.

:?

Avatar image for Nyuuuu
Nyuuuu

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#263 Nyuuuu
Member since 2010 • 380 Posts

[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"]

[QUOTE="Birdy09"] Technically it is, theres no disputing that, but im asking whats the point in bragging about technical ALL THE FRIGGIN TIME, when most PC Developers dont even take good advantage of it, just throw it in to what otherwise is a bland looking game.Birdy09

Stalker.. bland? What the **** are you talking about? No other game offers the desolate, gritty atmosphere and envoirements Stalker offers. Stalkers main selling point is it's immersive atmosphere. I'm not 12. I don't want to pretend I'm Indiana Jones in some cheesy childish Hollywood blockbuster. :roll:

The atosphere was no different from many other post-apocolyptic games with some exceptions. hell Doom 3 had more atmosphere, and dead space, I enjoyed stalker. but please, dont pretend like the game is the most techincailly impressive thing that cant be done elsewhere.... most of the underground sections were impressive, not much else was. Im 22.... I dont pretend to be anything, hell, its the same old crap, now im pretending im a godamn russian stalker in a field im suppose to feel more mature because its all brown? filled with AI beats that i can knife to death without ever getting hit... constantly. Im not debating STALKER as a good game, im refering to techinical graphics and its lackluster use.

In your opinion. I personally think Stalker has the best artstyle in gaming, but ofcourse that's my opinion.

Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#265 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

Arguing with a PC gamer = arguing with a brick wall.Chrome-

Arguing with a Console gamer = arguing with a non schizophrenic monkey, whose idea of an argument is not throwing feces everywhere.

Avatar image for loadedboon
loadedboon

1986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#266 loadedboon
Member since 2004 • 1986 Posts

[QUOTE="Chrome-"]Arguing with a PC gamer = arguing with a brick wall.Hakkai007

Arguing with a Console gamer = arguing with a schizophrenic monkey, whose idea of an argument is throwing feces everywhere.

while I do agree I would edit that post unless you want to be moderated/suspended.

Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#269 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

[QUOTE="Chrome-"]Arguing with a PC gamer = arguing with a brick wall.loadedboon

Arguing with a Console gamer = arguing with a schizophrenic monkey, whose idea of an argument is throwing feces everywhere.

while I do agree I would edit that post unless you want to be moderated/suspended.

Well you did quote it so it's hard to change it fully.

His response was just as insulting anyway.

"Arguing with a Console gamer = arguing with a non schizophrenic monkey, whose idea of an argument is not throwing feces everywhere."

happy?

Also I have been suspended like 10+ times already.

Avatar image for loadedboon
loadedboon

1986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#270 loadedboon
Member since 2004 • 1986 Posts

[QUOTE="loadedboon"]

[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

Arguing with a Console gamer = arguing with a schizophrenic monkey, whose idea of an argument is throwing feces everywhere.

Hakkai007

while I do agree I would edit that post unless you want to be moderated/suspended.

Well you did quote it so it's hard to change it fully.

His response was just as insulting anyway.

"Arguing with a Console gamer = arguing with anonschizophrenic monkey, whose idea of an argument isnotthrowing feces everywhere."

happy?

Also I have been suspended like 10+ times already.

I wasn't attacking you Iagree with what you said what's it like to argue with a console gamer :)

Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#271 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

[QUOTE="loadedboon"]

while I do agree I would edit that post unless you want to be moderated/suspended.

loadedboon

Well you did quote it so it's hard to change it fully.

His response was just as insulting anyway.

"Arguing with a Console gamer = arguing with anonschizophrenic monkey, whose idea of an argument isnotthrowing feces everywhere."

happy?

Also I have been suspended like 10+ times already.

I wasn't attacking you Iagree with what you said what's it like to argue with a console gamer :)

I know but I sometimes think there is a certain mod who really dislikes me since I was modded for some pretty dumb stuff.

I got an infraction because someone was posting pics of modded GTA VI Liberty City and said he bet no one could name the game.

I responded with "looks at license plate....yah...." (license plate on car ingame said Liberty)

I got suspened for posting a non sexual pic of an oblivion girl in underwear that covered everything.

Yet people post screenshots of games like Beyonetta which are worse and get no suspension.

Avatar image for loadedboon
loadedboon

1986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#272 loadedboon
Member since 2004 • 1986 Posts

[QUOTE="loadedboon"]

[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

Well you did quote it so it's hard to change it fully.

His response was just as insulting anyway.

"Arguing with a Console gamer = arguing with anonschizophrenic monkey, whose idea of an argument isnotthrowing feces everywhere."

happy?

Also I have been suspended like 10+ times already.

Hakkai007

I wasn't attacking you Iagree with what you said what's it like to argue with a console gamer :)

I know but I sometimes think there is a certain mod who really dislikes me since I was modded for some pretty dumb stuff.

I got an infraction because someone was posting pics of modded GTA VI Liberty City and said he bet no one could name the game.

I responded with "looks at license plate....yah...." (license plate on car ingame said Liberty)

I got suspened for posting a non sexual pic of an oblivion girl in underwear that covered everything.

Yet people post screenshots of games like Beyonetta which are worse and get no suspension.

I know the feeling but that's SW for ya. I have had my fair share of warnings and suspensions too but I don't really care.

Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#273 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

Arguing with a PC gamer = arguing with a brick wall.Chrome-

The damage control is strong in this one.

Or haven't you noticed that consolites have been wrong during the whole thread?

Avatar image for Chrome-
Chrome-

1744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#274 Chrome-
Member since 2009 • 1744 Posts

[QUOTE="Chrome-"]Arguing with a PC gamer = arguing with a brick wall.N30F3N1X

The damage control is strong in this one.

Or haven't you noticed that consolites have been wrong during the whole thread?

Ofcourse they have I mean arguing against the PC is pointless afterall. :?
Avatar image for MajorGamer531
MajorGamer531

1215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#275 MajorGamer531
Member since 2005 • 1215 Posts

PC Gamers keep to themselves until some console fanboy decided to take a stick and poke the Hornet's nest. To me this thread is like you poked the Hornet's nest, got stung, and are now complaining about it.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#276 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]A few do like their PC's a *little* too muchmillerlight89

*raises hand* That would be me :oops:

Me too. :P Only because it kicks so much ass. I cant help but love it.
Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#277 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

PC Gamers keep to themselves until some console fanboy decided to take a stick and poke the Hornet's nest. To me this thread is like you poked the Hornet's nest, got stung, and are now complaining about it.

MajorGamer531

Reminds me. I haven't seen the TC since page 1.

Shoot. He's probably having a laugh somewhere. I would. :lol:

Avatar image for shane_orija
shane_orija

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#278 shane_orija
Member since 2008 • 910 Posts
Even though I am a PC gamer who plays the PS3/360 casually, I agree with OP. SW isn't about proving something for real but rather about having some fun. Kinda like the /b/ of Gaming forums, it does suck when PC gamers or for that matter, even console lovers get all serious about nothing.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#279 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
I agree completly, they do like pc is god and when you point them the bad ports and how console focused the games are they are like "ohh no you are wrong on pc everything is better becauese pc is god and it does not matter you need a super rig" Whateverssss Pc has tons of possible issues in games in regard of optimazation, drivers, hardware and errors. Most people prefer consoles because games just work and they dont have to bother far with all these or drm crap, Thats all there is to it and those people can be called noobs by pc gamers but guess what? In the end its easier and more simple and it wins the battle.
Avatar image for haberman13
haberman13

2414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#280 haberman13
Member since 2003 • 2414 Posts

I agree, PC is the best gaming platform, why even debate this anymore?

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#281 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
[QUOTE="N30F3N1X"]

[QUOTE="Chrome-"]Arguing with a PC gamer = arguing with a brick wall.Chrome-

The damage control is strong in this one.

Or haven't you noticed that consolites have been wrong during the whole thread?

Ofcourse they have I mean arguing against the PC is pointless afterall. :?

Trust me i feel you, whatever i say against the pc is wrong and not possible but consoles are soooo inferior yet pc games have higher and higher requirements when consoles remain the same. They do a look better but at what rate? Not that high to justify quad cores i can assure you. Also for the record. consoles can run stalker its not a good looking game it looks very dated. It is a fact stalker is not a demanding game or good looking ot only has dx10 apart from that its nothing impressive.
Avatar image for haberman13
haberman13

2414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#282 haberman13
Member since 2003 • 2414 Posts

I agree completly, they do like pc is god and when you point them the bad ports and how console focused the games are they are like "ohh no you are wrong on pc everything is better becauese pc is god and it does not matter you need a super rig" Whateverssss Pc has tons of possible issues in games in regard of optimazation, drivers, hardware and errors. Most people prefer consoles because games just work and they dont have to bother far with all these or drm crap, Thats all there is to it and those people can be called noobs by pc gamers but guess what? In the end its easier and more simple and it wins the battle.dakan45

Also true, lack of tech skills make the consoles very attractive. People like me (IT field) are where PC gamers mostly live, consoles are so easy that anyone can use them, I don't have trouble with my PC/gaming but I can understand how the less capable tech-wise would.

Lets face it, most people don't care HOW something works, they just want it to work --- hence the consoles.

Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#283 Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5594 Posts

[QUOTE="Xtasy26"]

[QUOTE="markinthedark"]

why not compare average console graphics to average pc graphics? seems like a more honest and logical way to go about things. Just using the best examples and pretending the worst examples dont exist is rather misleading.

markinthedark

Because when console fanboys claim that their X,Y,Z is better looking than X,Y,Z game on the PC, why would we not show off the graphical capabilites of the PC to prove them wrong that their X,Y,Z game can never look this good. Why would we compare "average" thing when we are looking for the "best".

because that is what the average PC gamer is looking at. If you are arguing for the PC as a platform, you need to take into consideration the entire platform.

If you want to make the argument that Joe's brand new $5000 computer has better graphics than consoles, then fair enough... post his pics.

If you want to argue that the PC as a platform has better graphics... then you should probably post something that is a good representation of that platform.

Some dude who brought his PC into an industrial freezer to keep it from overheating while he takes a screen shots of a game running at 1fps isnt really a fair comparison imo (obviously... im sure nobody goes to these lengths... but it could be done in order to get screen caps far above any possible playable level in a real world scenario).

Well, for the purpose of best graphics comparison you would obviously use the best that the PC can do VS the consoles. Not doing so would be just retarded. I can understand comparing settings in medium to consoles to see how it looks but that won't be considered as the best VS best. And your $5000 dollar is WAY off the mark. The best graphics card in the World is the HD 5970, combine that with other PC parts it would still notbe $1500. Maybe even less.

Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#284 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts

[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="Nyuuuu"]

Stalker.. bland? What the **** are you talking about? No other game offers the desolate, gritty atmosphere and envoirements Stalker offers. Stalkers main selling point is it's immersive atmosphere. I'm not 12. I don't want to pretend I'm Indiana Jones in some cheesy childish Hollywood blockbuster. :roll:

loadedboon

The atosphere was no different from many other post-apocolyptic games with some exceptions. hell Doom 3 had more atmosphere, and dead space, I enjoyed stalker. but please, dont pretend like the game is the most techincailly impressive thing that cant be done elsewhere.... most of the underground sections were impressive, not much else was. Im 22.... I dont pretend to be anything, hell, its the same old crap, now im pretending im a godamn russian stalker in a field im suppose to feel more mature because its all brown? filled with AI beats that i can knife to death without ever getting hit... constantly. Im not debating STALKER as a good game, im refering to techinical graphics and its lackluster use.

Are you saying a PS3 or 360 is capable of running Stalker? :lol:

.... what is this I Dont even....
Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#285 Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5594 Posts

Uncharted 2 looks horrible in outside environments. The textures and folliage everything looks nothing like Crysis. While in very small environments with narrow corridors can the game can be made to look good but it compares nothing to Cyrsis or other PC games. Just goes to show Crysis engine is light years ahead of Uncharted 2, which is supposed to be one of the best looking games on the consoles. Just goes to show in demanding outdoor environments Uncharted 2 and the PS3 how badly it is behind the PC.

:lol:

WhenCicadasCry

Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#286 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts

[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="Nyuuuu"] The atosphere was no different from many other post-apocolyptic games with some exceptions. hell Doom 3 had more atmosphere, and dead space, I enjoyed stalker. but please, dont pretend like the game is the most techincailly impressive thing that cant be done elsewhere.... most of the underground sections were impressive, not much else was. Im 22.... I dont pretend to be anything, hell, its the same old crap, now im pretending im a godamn russian stalker in a field im suppose to feel more mature because its all brown? filled with AI beats that i can knife to death without ever getting hit... constantly. Im not debating STALKER as a good game, im refering to techinical graphics and its lackluster use.loadedboon

Are you saying a PS3 or 360 is capable of running Stalker? :lol:

.... what is this I Dont even....

I love how everyone praises Uncharted 2s animations, yet Drake always seems to hover for a few seconds when he's about to drop from a ledge. :lol:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdN9Bub58no Watch from 35 seconds.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oG0ZHRfvdlg Watch from 45 seconds.

:?

Nyuuuu
No offence, but you cant mock one game for something so minor, considering not many do it better. compared to STALKER which has very average animations, and gunplay animations and any kind of movement. hell, how stiff everyone is is a joke.
Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#287 Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5594 Posts

I have yet to see anything top this :P:

/thread.

Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#288 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts
You are all proving the TC right though, the umber of half-arsed crap responses ive had followed by ":lol:s" because you cant seem to grasp a simple concept such as "Arstistic > Technical" ... but then only on gamespot have i ever seen Crysis bragged out so much.... mostly flash, incredible substancless "sandbox". if it didnt push techinicality, nobody would of looked at it twice.
Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#290 Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5594 Posts

You are all proving the TC right though, the umber of half-arsed crap responses ive had followed by ":lol:s" because you cant seem to grasp a simple concept such as "Arstistic > Technical" ... but then only on gamespot have i ever seen Crysis bragged out so much.... mostly flash, incredible substancless "sandbox". if it didnt push techinicality, nobody would of looked at it twice.Birdy09

Me prefers Technical over artisitcs. :) It's more than about technically, it's an awesome game!

Avatar image for ProjectNatalFan
ProjectNatalFan

2471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#293 ProjectNatalFan
Member since 2010 • 2471 Posts

its pointless because the people in this forum arent realistic. Im a pc gamer but I know console gaming is doing much better, its as clear as day

http://www.techspot.com/news/37632-retail-pc-games-sales-decline-23-percent-in-2009.html

Avatar image for Nyuuuu
Nyuuuu

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#294 Nyuuuu
Member since 2010 • 380 Posts

[QUOTE="Nyuuuu"]

I love how everyone praises Uncharted 2s animations, yet Drake always seems to hover for a few seconds when he's about to drop from a ledge. :lol:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdN9Bub58no Watch from 35 seconds.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oG0ZHRfvdlg Watch from 45 seconds.

:?

Birdy09

No offence, but you cant mock one game for something so minor, considering not many do it better. compared to STALKER which has very average animations, and gunplay animations and any kind of movement. hell, how stiff everyone is is a joke.

I've never said Stalker had great animations. Infact, I've said several times it has possibly the most laughable animations in a game in recent memory, and laughably bad character models. But where Stalker shines is in it's enviroment. But a game lauded for it's animations, you can clearly see Drake hovering in mid air...

How about this?

I haven't seen clipping that bad since the Nintendo 64 days. Stalker might have it's faults, HELL, you can even call say it was released in alpha state, but it still has possible the best enviroment detail since Crysis and Metro 2033.

There's simply no contest.

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#295 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts

its pointless because the people in this forum arent realistic. Im a pc gamer but I know console gaming is doing much better, its as clear as day

http://www.techspot.com/news/37632-retail-pc-games-sales-decline-23-percent-in-2009.html

ProjectNatalFan

Except that...

PC digital downloads represented close to half of unit sales across digital and retail at 48 percent in 2009, and accounted for 36 percent of dollar sales.

And i highly doubt you're an actual PC gamer.

Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#296 Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5594 Posts

its pointless because the people in this forum arent realistic. Im a pc gamer but I know console gaming is doing much better, its as clear as day

http://www.techspot.com/news/37632-retail-pc-games-sales-decline-23-percent-in-2009.html

ProjectNatalFan

Perhaps you should look into digital download stats on the PC. ;)

Avatar image for Nyuuuu
Nyuuuu

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#297 Nyuuuu
Member since 2010 • 380 Posts

[QUOTE="ProjectNatalFan"]

its pointless because the people in this forum arent realistic. Im a pc gamer but I know console gaming is doing much better, its as clear as day

http://www.techspot.com/news/37632-retail-pc-games-sales-decline-23-percent-in-2009.html

Xtasy26

Perhaps you should look into digital download stats on the PC. ;)

Ignore him. He's genuinely looking forward to Kinect. :lol:

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62042

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#298 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62042 Posts

its pointless because the people in this forum arent realistic. Im a pc gamer but I know console gaming is doing much better, its as clear as day

http://www.techspot.com/news/37632-retail-pc-games-sales-decline-23-percent-in-2009.html

ProjectNatalFan

Psssst... Retail.

DD accounts for at least 50% of the market in the US alone.

Avatar image for NVIDIATI
NVIDIATI

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#299 NVIDIATI
Member since 2010 • 8463 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]

[QUOTE="AtariKidX"]

God of War 3 - Kratos vs Cronos

............and that is a bad guality video from the game.:roll:

AtariKidX

That's not bad quality, that's 720p.

This is bad quality:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPi0AhQgrDs

And it still looks better, fancy that.

Uncharted 2: Among Thieves

....and again it look a lot better on HDTV.It is really good to see that only Crysis looks better than U2 and GoW3.8)

That doesn't even make sense..... And no there are A LOT of PC games that look A LOT better than U2 and GOW3.

Avatar image for ProjectNatalFan
ProjectNatalFan

2471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#300 ProjectNatalFan
Member since 2010 • 2471 Posts

[QUOTE="ProjectNatalFan"]

its pointless because the people in this forum arent realistic. Im a pc gamer but I know console gaming is doing much better, its as clear as day

http://www.techspot.com/news/37632-retail-pc-games-sales-decline-23-percent-in-2009.html

DragonfireXZ95

Except that...

PC digital downloads represented close to half of unit sales across digital and retail at 48 percent in 2009, and accounted for 36 percent of dollar sales.

And i highly doubt you're an actual PC gamer.

i build computers and have a pc gaming rig. I download from steam but the fact that you guys think DD is enough to beat out consoles is laughable. PC gaming is not on the same level, my links are from reputable sources, yours not so much and alot of lack of real numbers also hurt your argument. Keep thinking that PC gaming is doing great, thats fine, but its not doing better than consoles, not by a longshot, and MS which is in both PC gaming and COnsole gaming would completely agree with me, and not you.