Crysis 2 coming to consoles

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for shadow_hosi
shadow_hosi

9543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#301 shadow_hosi
Member since 2006 • 9543 Posts
as long as the pc version isn't gimped ill be fine.
Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#302 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts
oh mannn that's potentially bad news. Couldn't they have just given the consoles a gimped version of crysis wars?
Avatar image for madskills6117
madskills6117

4172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#303 madskills6117
Member since 2006 • 4172 Posts

Crysis 2 on consoles will not looks as good as it's PC counterpart but that's not the goal of Crytek. Crytek is not only looking to cash in on the Crysis name but to surpass any console only game. Anyone who thinks Crysis 2 will be anything short of amazing looking on consoles is delusional. This is Crytek's chance to show what the new engine can do so they can lease it to other developers. Sort of what Epic did with Gears of War and the Unreal Engine 3. After the developers picked their jaws up off the ground looking at Gears of War they went and leased the engine based on its potential.

Avatar image for Gamersince81
Gamersince81

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#304 Gamersince81
Member since 2007 • 1787 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamersince81"]

I bought every pc game legally with the f'n box. I just built my pc to run Crysis recently. I feel like shooting every hermit that stole or pirated in the head 1,000,000,000 times. Perfect f'n timing. Thanks pirates i spent opver 1000.00 for nothing (since my rig was designed for Crysis series). Meh, at least i can still play Crysis and Warhead i guess. But if your a pirate AVOID ME seriously... this is all your fault..

Vandalvideo

Just what Crytek wants you to do, blaim the pirates; ignore the obvious business move.

Your right, i am going to ignore the business move why? It is the pirates fault. Epic was smart enough to move faster than Crytek. I been a console gamer for overtwenty years, you would think i would be happy but im pissed. I JUST got into PC gaming. Hell, its like this.. Why would someone wanna steal a damn videogame that sombody worked their ass off to make? I don't blame Crytek, at least the PS3 version wont get pirated like the PC and 360. Bottom line, i spent over a 1000.00 to get into PC gaming to play games like Crysis and Stalker.. Hell i bet stalker will go to consoles as well.. ME EQUAL OWNED. ME EQUALS PISSED NOW!! :evil:

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#305 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

- EA buys Crytek
- EA tells Crytek to put their engine on consoles for them to make more money
- EA demands Crytek put their very successful franchise on consoles to make more money

Hopefully Cevat Yerli's assessment that "Crysis in its current form is impossible on consoles" was wrong. Because if not, either the console versions of Crysis 2 are going to suck or they have dumbed down the first game in order to make it work on consoles.

Avatar image for out0v0rder
out0v0rder

1994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#306 out0v0rder
Member since 2006 • 1994 Posts
Consolites before Jun 1: "CRYSIS IS BORING AND CRAP. IT'S ALL SHOW NO GO!" Consolites now: "WOO IN YOUR FACE HERMITS, I'M GONNA PLAY CRYSIS NOW
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#307 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Your right, i am going to ignore the business move why? It is the pirates fault. Epic was smart enough to move faster than Crytek. I been a console gamer for overtwenty years, you would think i would be happy but im pissed. I JUST got into PC gaming. Hell, its like this.. Why would someone wanna steal a damn videogame that sombody worked their ass off to make? I don't blame Crytek, at least the PS3 version wont get pirated like the PC and 360. Bottom line, i spent over a 1000.00 to get into PC gaming to play games like Crysis and Stalker.. Hell i bet stalker will go to consoles as well.. ME EQUAL OWNED. ME EQUALS PISSED NOW!! :evil:Gamersince81
It is most certainly not the pirates fault. Crysis was a wildly successful venture for Crytek on the PC, selling more than 3 million copies in the first year. In PC terms, that is quite a significant acheivement. Game development costs are rising on every platform because of increased complexity. To make up for development costs, developers have to shore out more money. It has nothing to do with the PC being a particularly pirate prone platform. Every single platform is losing out on third party exclusives. It is the nature of the business. This is a calculated business venture on Crytek's part to make more money. This is not the pirates' problem. You can't use them as a scape goat for Crytek making a blatantly obvious power grab.
Avatar image for noble_aryan
noble_aryan

722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#308 noble_aryan
Member since 2009 • 722 Posts

pshh...so much about how the game cant be done on consoles......another win for consoles yaay :D

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#309 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

pshh...so much about how the game cant be done on consoles......another win for consoles yaay :D

noble_aryan
Just because Crysis 2 is annoucned for consoles doesn't mean it will be remotely similar to the PC version.
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#310 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

as long as the pc version isn't gimped ill be fine.shadow_hosi

It's going to get gimped, that isn't even in question here.

CryEngine 3 is designed to use PC as the lead platform and pump out console assets/code as it goes along. While this means the PC version gets the highest quality art assets, it's essentially the same source code but adapted to each platform.

If they do scale it up it will be with effects, the game design itself will be console limited to make sure it will run on those platforms.

Any additional effort to change the PC versions experience from the console versions would be counter productive, as it would go against what the engine was designed to do to cut development time and costs.

Avatar image for nVidiaGaMer
nVidiaGaMer

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#311 nVidiaGaMer
Member since 2006 • 7793 Posts

Crysis 2 on consoles will not looks as good as it's PC counterpart but that's not the goal of Crytek. Crytek is not only looking to cash in on the Crysis name but to surpass any console only game. Anyone who thinks Crysis 2 will be anything short of amazing looking on consoles is delusional. This is Crytek's chance to show what the new engine can do so they can lease it to other developers. Sort of what Epic did with Gears of War and the Unreal Engine 3. After the developers picked their jaws up off the ground looking at Gears of War they went and leased the engine based on its potential.

madskills6117

I loved how PC gamers said Crysis couldn't be done on consoles and now Crysis 2 is coming to the 360/PS3 and it will be one of the best looking games.

Avatar image for Kicker_of_Cans
Kicker_of_Cans

444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#312 Kicker_of_Cans
Member since 2009 • 444 Posts

pshh...so much about how the game cant be done on consoles......another win for consoles yaay :D

noble_aryan
Again, the original isn't coming to consoles. Crysis 2 will most likely be severely gimped.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#313 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
I loved how PC gamers said Crysis couldn't be done on consoles and now Crysis 2 is coming to the 360/PS3 and it will be one of the best looking games.nVidiaGaMer
We haven't even formally seen Crysis 2 yet. It is undeniably going to be a gimped game.
Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#314 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

[QUOTE="Baranga"]

[QUOTE="Kicker_of_Cans"] The original sold more than $2 Million, and broke even in early 2008. Do some research next time.Cyberfairy

It's over 3 millions now, and Warhead was also a major success. They spent 15 million Euro making it, part of which was from Nvidia and Intel, and it turned out a good profit.

Crysis didn't sell 3 million and you wouldn't find a single announcement from EA or Crytek that it even sold 2 million. No one has a clue how many people actually bought Crysis but I doubt it was a huge success.

Use common sense. It sold 1 million in two months. In September it was in the US PC top 10. It was re-released a few weeks ago. It's cheap now. It's still used as a benchmark, and PCs are cheaper every day. Of course it sold that good.

Avatar image for nVidiaGaMer
nVidiaGaMer

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#315 nVidiaGaMer
Member since 2006 • 7793 Posts

[QUOTE="noble_aryan"]

pshh...so much about how the game cant be done on consoles......another win for consoles yaay :D

Vandalvideo

Just because Crysis 2 is annoucned for consoles doesn't mean it will be remotely similar to the PC version.

Oh it will be the same game the original XBOX had 64mb of RAM and a 32MB videocard and a lowly Pentium III at 733MHz and it had Half Life 2, Far Cry, and Doom III which all had higher requirements for the PC versions. The PS3/XBOX 360 all exceed the minium requirements for Crysis by a long shot.

Avatar image for Nagidar
Nagidar

6231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#316 Nagidar
Member since 2006 • 6231 Posts

[QUOTE="madskills6117"]

Crysis 2 on consoles will not looks as good as it's PC counterpart but that's not the goal of Crytek. Crytek is not only looking to cash in on the Crysis name but to surpass any console only game. Anyone who thinks Crysis 2 will be anything short of amazing looking on consoles is delusional. This is Crytek's chance to show what the new engine can do so they can lease it to other developers. Sort of what Epic did with Gears of War and the Unreal Engine 3. After the developers picked their jaws up off the ground looking at Gears of War they went and leased the engine based on its potential.

nVidiaGaMer

I loved how PC gamers said Crysis couldn't be done on consoles and now Crysis 2 is coming to the 360/PS3 and it will be one of the best looking games.

Crysis isn't coming to consoles.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#317 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Oh it will be the same game the original XBOX had 64mb of RAM and a 32MB videocard and a lowly Pentium III at 733MHz and it had Half Life 2, Far Cry, and Doom III which all had higher requirements for the PC versions. The PS3/XBOX 360 all exceed the minium requirements for Crysis by a long shot.nVidiaGaMer
The developers Themselves said Crysis, in its original form cannot be done on consoles. Like Far Cry, Deus Ex, and countless others before it, the game WILL be dumbed down. It is just a matter of how much. Consoles do not have the required ram to run the game on medium let alone minumum.
Avatar image for noble_aryan
noble_aryan

722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#318 noble_aryan
Member since 2009 • 722 Posts

[QUOTE="noble_aryan"]

pshh...so much about how the game cant be done on consoles......another win for consoles yaay :D

Kicker_of_Cans

Again, the original isn't coming to consoles. Crysis 2 will most likely be severely gimped.

thats tru....but iv seen the crytec engin or w.e on consoles and the games looks amazin, maybe not pc amazin but hell, its better then nothing. this mite be the game to beat killzone 2 graphics

Avatar image for nVidiaGaMer
nVidiaGaMer

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#319 nVidiaGaMer
Member since 2006 • 7793 Posts

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]I loved how PC gamers said Crysis couldn't be done on consoles and now Crysis 2 is coming to the 360/PS3 and it will be one of the best looking games.Vandalvideo
We haven't even formally seen Crysis 2 yet. It is undeniably going to be a gimped game.

You can't say for sure. The PS3/360 aren't maxed out. Gears of War 2 is still one of the best looking games console or PC and Epic even said they only used about 70 percent of the 360s power.

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#321 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

I loved how PC gamers said Crysis couldn't be done on consoles and now Crysis 2 is coming to the 360/PS3 and it will be one of the best looking games.

nVidiaGaMer

All these years explaining the memory issue with Crysis and people still don't get it...

What part of all those diagrams and resource usage screenshots and so on do people not understand?

Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#322 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]I loved how PC gamers said Crysis couldn't be done on consoles and now Crysis 2 is coming to the 360/PS3 and it will be one of the best looking games.nVidiaGaMer

We haven't even formally seen Crysis 2 yet. It is undeniably going to be a gimped game.

You can't say for sure. The PS3/360 aren't maxed out. Gears of War 2 is still one of the best looking games console or PC and Epic even said they only used about 70 percent of the 360s power.

Gears 2 looks worse than Gears PC.

Avatar image for damstr
damstr

8217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#323 damstr
Member since 2003 • 8217 Posts
This better not be dumbed down.AAllxxjjnn
Thats the only way it will ever run on the PS3/360. This game was meant for next gen consoles.
Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#324 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts

I loved how PC gamers said Crysis couldn't be done on consoles and now Crysis 2 is coming to the 360/PS3 and it will be one of the best looking games.

nVidiaGaMer

Crysis can't be done on consoles. Crysis 2 on the other hand...

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#325 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
You can't say for sure. The PS3/360 aren't maxed out. Gears of War 2 is still one of the best looking games console or PC and Epic even said they only used about 70 percent of the 360s power.nVidiaGaMer
I can say for sure, because neither console has enough RAM to run all the assets of the original title. The developers said so as much, and there are countless screenshot proofs, like AnnoyedDragon posted, that prove as much.
Avatar image for nVidiaGaMer
nVidiaGaMer

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#326 nVidiaGaMer
Member since 2006 • 7793 Posts

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]Oh it will be the same game the original XBOX had 64mb of RAM and a 32MB videocard and a lowly Pentium III at 733MHz and it had Half Life 2, Far Cry, and Doom III which all had higher requirements for the PC versions. The PS3/XBOX 360 all exceed the minium requirements for Crysis by a long shot.Vandalvideo
The developers Themselves said Crysis, in its original form cannot be done on consoles. Like Far Cry, Deus Ex, and countless others before it, the game WILL be dumbed down. It is just a matter of how much. Consoles do not have the required ram to run the game on medium let alone minumum.

Consoles are different try running Half Life 2 on 64MB of RAM (not gonna happen) now take the XBOX and pop in Half Life 2 and it runs fine with 64MB of RAM. They will optimize it and it will run and look amazing. I love it how the PC gamers only excuse is that it will be dumbed down. :lol:

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#327 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]I loved how PC gamers said Crysis couldn't be done on consoles and now Crysis 2 is coming to the 360/PS3 and it will be one of the best looking games.nVidiaGaMer

We haven't even formally seen Crysis 2 yet. It is undeniably going to be a gimped game.

You can't say for sure. The PS3/360 aren't maxed out. Gears of War 2 is still one of the best looking games console or PC and Epic even said they only used about 70 percent of the 360s power.

Ugh GeOW 2 uses 100% of the 360s 'power' So did BomberMan Act Zero :| Such a game will use all reasources to achieve its visual fidelity and hardware compelxity.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#329 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Consoles are different try running Half Life 2 on 64MB of RAM (not gonna happen) now take the XBOX and pop in Half Life 2 and it runs fine with 64MB of RAM. They will optimize it and it will run and look amazing. I love it how the PC gamers only excuse is that it will be dumbed down. :lol:nVidiaGaMer
Consoles are different, but there have been tests done, and have been posted, that annex the RAM required by background processes. Ignoring background processes, consoles DO NOT have enough ram to run the title. Fact.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#330 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Half LIfe 2 required 256MB of RAM minimum and it went to the XBOX with only 64MB of RAM. Anything is possible RAM isn't the most important thing.nVidiaGaMer
Including background processes. Again, tests have been done which conclusively show, ignoring background proceses, you need ATLEAST 1 gig of ram to run the game.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#331 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]Oh it will be the same game the original XBOX had 64mb of RAM and a 32MB videocard and a lowly Pentium III at 733MHz and it had Half Life 2, Far Cry, and Doom III which all had higher requirements for the PC versions. The PS3/XBOX 360 all exceed the minium requirements for Crysis by a long shot.nVidiaGaMer

The developers Themselves said Crysis, in its original form cannot be done on consoles. Like Far Cry, Deus Ex, and countless others before it, the game WILL be dumbed down. It is just a matter of how much. Consoles do not have the required ram to run the game on medium let alone minumum.

Consoles are different try running Half Life 2 on 64MB of RAM (not gonna happen) now take the XBOX and pop in Half Life 2 and it runs fine with 64MB of RAM. They will optimize it and it will run and look amazing. I love it how the PC gamers only excuse is that it will be dumbed down. :lol:

Half Life 2 didnt run 'fine'... it was docked for its poor framerate and cut down enviroments.... And mind you HL2 was a confined game, especially next to the Far Cry

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#332 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

pshh...so much about how the game cant be done on consoles......another win for consoles yaay :D

noble_aryan


Cevat Yerli, the company's president and director has said for the past three years that the PC Crysis was "impossible in its current form on consoles." So obviously, the PC Crysis we saw a couple years ago and hear about up until now will not be on consoles. It will be a simpler and much less open version.

Avatar image for nVidiaGaMer
nVidiaGaMer

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#333 nVidiaGaMer
Member since 2006 • 7793 Posts

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] We haven't even formally seen Crysis 2 yet. It is undeniably going to be a gimped game.loco145

You can't say for sure. The PS3/360 aren't maxed out. Gears of War 2 is still one of the best looking games console or PC and Epic even said they only used about 70 percent of the 360s power.

Gears 2 looks worse than Gears PC.

Yeah only at 1080P with 4xAA.

Gears 3 will look better then Gears on PC.

Avatar image for zatorys
zatorys

638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#334 zatorys
Member since 2007 • 638 Posts

This actually makes me pretty sad.

shutdown_202
me 2 :( pc is over
Avatar image for nVidiaGaMer
nVidiaGaMer

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#335 nVidiaGaMer
Member since 2006 • 7793 Posts

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] We haven't even formally seen Crysis 2 yet. It is undeniably going to be a gimped game.skrat_01

You can't say for sure. The PS3/360 aren't maxed out. Gears of War 2 is still one of the best looking games console or PC and Epic even said they only used about 70 percent of the 360s power.

Ugh GeOW 2 uses 100% of the 360s 'power' So did BomberMan Act Zero :| Such a game will use all reasources to achieve its visual fidelity and hardware compelxity.

Yeah Gears 2 used 100 percent of Unreal Engine 3.5s capabilities but it didn't max out the 360s power. Unreal Engine 4.0 will probably do that.

Avatar image for nVidiaGaMer
nVidiaGaMer

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#336 nVidiaGaMer
Member since 2006 • 7793 Posts

Cryengine 3 demonstration for 360/PS3 in Real Time

The game looks incredible.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#337 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
The game looks incredible.nVidiaGaMer
That is a tech demo in a controlled setting. That isn't the real game.
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#338 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

Consoles are different try running Half Life 2 on 64MB of RAM (not gonna happen) now take the XBOX and pop in Half Life 2 and it runs fine with 64MB of RAM. They will optimize it and it will run and look amazing. I love it how the PC gamers only excuse is that it will be dumbed down. :lol:

nVidiaGaMer

Different doesnt equal magic ability to fit 1GB+ into 256mb.

Consoles deal with less memory by having much faster ram so they can stream it in chunks, you can get a 1GB level into consoles by dividing it up and loading it piece by piece depending on the players location.

The problem with this, which has been explained over and over again, is Crysis needs 1GB+ of memory 'at any one time'. The only way to get it working on consoles is to divided it up, which alters the game play because you can only interact with whatever 'bubble' you happen to be in at that time.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#339 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts
[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

[QUOTE="loco145"]

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

You can't say for sure. The PS3/360 aren't maxed out. Gears of War 2 is still one of the best looking games console or PC and Epic even said they only used about 70 percent of the 360s power.

Gears 2 looks worse than Gears PC.

Yeah only at 1080P with 4xAA.

Gears 3 will look better then Gears on PC.

Um ya :roll: cough,cough upconvert and little to no AA, if there was AA its wouldnt look like low rez pixelated crap.
Avatar image for PS3_3DO
PS3_3DO

10976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#341 PS3_3DO
Member since 2006 • 10976 Posts

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] We haven't even formally seen Crysis 2 yet. It is undeniably going to be a gimped game.loco145

You can't say for sure. The PS3/360 aren't maxed out. Gears of War 2 is still one of the best looking games console or PC and Epic even said they only used about 70 percent of the 360s power.

Gears 2 looks worse than Gears PC.

Sure it did. Hahahaha :lol:

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#342 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts
[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

Consoles are different try running Half Life 2 on 64MB of RAM (not gonna happen) now take the XBOX and pop in Half Life 2 and it runs fine with 64MB of RAM. They will optimize it and it will run and look amazing. I love it how the PC gamers only excuse is that it will be dumbed down. :lol:

Different doesnt equal magic ability to fit 1GB+ into 256mb.

Consoles deal with less memory by having much faster ram so they can stream it in chunks, you can get a 1GB level into consoles by dividing it up and loading it piece by piece depending on the players location.

The problem with this, which has been explained over and over again, is Crysis needs 1GB+ of memory 'at any one time'. The only way to get it working on consoles is to divided it up, which alters the game play because you can only interact with whatever 'bubble' you happen to be in at that time.

Excalty you cant fit 1gb of info into a thing thats can only hold 256mb.
Avatar image for PS3_3DO
PS3_3DO

10976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#343 PS3_3DO
Member since 2006 • 10976 Posts

Least the PC version is not going to require a $6000 PC to play it and not max it out for almost two years. :lol:

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#344 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

Least the PC version is not going to require a $6000 PC to play it and not max it out for almost two years. :lol:

PS3_3DO
Very accurate. The PC version does not require a 6K PC rig.
Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#345 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts

[QUOTE="loco145"]

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

You can't say for sure. The PS3/360 aren't maxed out. Gears of War 2 is still one of the best looking games console or PC and Epic even said they only used about 70 percent of the 360s power.

PS3_3DO

Gears 2 looks worse than Gears PC.

Sure it did. Hahahaha :lol:

Whats so funny? it did. Thanks to higher res textures, 4xAA, 60fps and 1080p, it did.

Avatar image for horrowhip
horrowhip

5002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#346 horrowhip
Member since 2005 • 5002 Posts

I am not worried. Crytek will continue to be PC Lead. Germans are PC gamers. They may make the game on console as well, but the game will be a game for their PC gaming fanbase. Specifically the German PC gaming fanbase who has so vigorously supported Crytek with all its releases... Also, anyone who has followed Crytek knows that Crytek has stated that they will design multiple versions of a game if necessary. One on the PC, and then another different version on the consoles. If that is what it takes, that is what they will do.

Also, given the timing of this announcement, they may be showing something today at the press conference.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#347 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts
Heck my younger brother's $500 Pc I made him runs crysis all on high at 1280x1024 fine.
Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#348 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

[QUOTE="noble_aryan"]

pshh...so much about how the game cant be done on consoles......another win for consoles yaay :D

foxhound_fox


Cevat Yerli, the company's president and director has said for the past three years that the PC Crysis was "impossible in its current form on consoles." So obviously, the PC Crysis we saw a couple years ago and hear about up until now will not be on consoles. It will be a simpler and much less open version.

Yes, and in a GDC interview, which I'm getting a bit tired of linking, he explained how they made it work because CE3 is another CryTek miracle. Don't be paranoid.

And it was said before, they're Germans. They don't sacrifice their vision for console's sake, and they sometimes make the impossible to achieve this goal (Sacred 2 anyone?).

Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#349 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts

Least the PC version is not going to require a $6000 PC to play it and not max it out for almost two years. :lol:

PS3_3DO
God I love consolites. Get your basic facts straight next time.
Avatar image for PS3_3DO
PS3_3DO

10976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#350 PS3_3DO
Member since 2006 • 10976 Posts

[QUOTE="PS3_3DO"]

Least the PC version is not going to require a $6000 PC to play it and not max it out for almost two years. :lol:

Vandalvideo

Very accurate. The PC version does not require a 6K PC rig.

The first time Crysis came out you couldn't max it out no matter how powerful a PC you had at the time.