Dev's Say Games Enhanced on PS4 Over PC Versions (Link)

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-58e448fd89d82
deactivated-58e448fd89d82

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#501 deactivated-58e448fd89d82
Member since 2010 • 4494 Posts

[QUOTE="AMD655"]

I am so sorry that you feel the need to be in such denial, but you are fully incorrect again, the video shows it all in action, there is no dips at all when explosions are happening, your GPU is not made out of gold, and it is not as superior as you think it is.

 

I did not enable any mods, so yes, that is how Crysis looks, welcome to the real world.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow6ikvwjP7w

clyde46

Videos are normally a bad way of representing frame rates as they can be encoded at a user's set level. I've recorded some MWO games at 45FPS then I drop them to 30FPS to smooth out the judder.

 

Yup, i encoded it with handbrake though, it is not even edited.

 

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#502 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="AMD655"]

I am so sorry that you feel the need to be in such denial, but you are fully incorrect again, the video shows it all in action, there is no dips at all when explosions are happening, your GPU is not made out of gold, and it is not as superior as you think it is.

 

I did not enable any mods, so yes, that is how Crysis looks, welcome to the real world.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow6ikvwjP7w

AMD655

Videos are normally a bad way of representing frame rates as they can be encoded at a user's set level. I've recorded some MWO games at 45FPS then I drop them to 30FPS to smooth out the judder.

 

Yup, i encoded it with handbrake though, it is not even edited.

 

What did you encode the video too? And you do know that Youtube limits videos to 30FPS anyway?
Avatar image for Chris_Williams
Chris_Williams

14882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#503 Chris_Williams
Member since 2009 • 14882 Posts

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="AMD655"]

I am so sorry that you feel the need to be in such denial, but you are fully incorrect again, the video shows it all in action, there is no dips at all when explosions are happening, your GPU is not made out of gold, and it is not as superior as you think it is.

 

I did not enable any mods, so yes, that is how Crysis looks, welcome to the real world.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow6ikvwjP7w

AMD655

Videos are normally a bad way of representing frame rates as they can be encoded at a user's set level. I've recorded some MWO games at 45FPS then I drop them to 30FPS to smooth out the judder.

 

Yup, i encoded it with handbrake though, it is not even edited.

 

Why would you try to showcase this when its so dark? Trying to hide something
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#504 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="AMD655"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"] Videos are normally a bad way of representing frame rates as they can be encoded at a user's set level. I've recorded some MWO games at 45FPS then I drop them to 30FPS to smooth out the judder. Chris_Williams

 

Yup, i encoded it with handbrake though, it is not even edited.

 

Why would you try to showcase this when its so dark? Trying to hide something

Its not been colour corrected so hush.
Avatar image for deactivated-58e448fd89d82
deactivated-58e448fd89d82

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#505 deactivated-58e448fd89d82
Member since 2010 • 4494 Posts

Encoded to MP4 from .AVi x264

It was encoded at 30fps, the actual game was recorded at 30fps with afterburner.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#506 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

[QUOTE="evildead6789"][QUOTE="AMD655"]

Not sure what you are getting at, 8xMSAA is playable also at stock, i could even prove that right now with the game modded...

I wrote 4xMSAA because you stated the game would be in single digits with a GTX 480 with MSAA.

 

 

You are fully wrong in what you said, now just accept it.

AMD655

All depends what you call playable. What do you want me to accept? I said you needed a 7870 to max crysis out at 720p. You having lower standards than me isn't the same as me being wrong

 

 

Which is a blatant lie^

 

A 7770 can max Crysis at that res.

 

"You only get 50 fps in the menus

40 fps when aiming at someone, can't imagine what happens with explosions in a firefight.

Besides your crysis looks like crap"

 

"These are average framerates, add the extra 4xAA (which would max it out..) and it slaughters the card in a firefight

And the 7870 xt isn't that much faster than the gtx 480 especially at stock."


"if the min fps goes into single digit framerates, then that's not really running it is it ocn member or not, you don't know what you're talking about"

 

When you use the build in fps meter you will see what I mean

You will see single digit framerates and it will hiccup and lag.

If the gtx 480 doesn't (at stock) then it must simply run the game better than my 7870 xt (at stock),

which would make your initial comment on my post kinda weird

Avatar image for deactivated-58e448fd89d82
deactivated-58e448fd89d82

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#507 deactivated-58e448fd89d82
Member since 2010 • 4494 Posts

Well, it never goes into single digits, not even once.

 

I know you wish it does, but sadly, nope.

 

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#508 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

Well, it never goes into single digits, not even once.

 

I know you wish it does, but sadly, nope.

 

AMD655
sure I don't think the driver will magically make the gtx 480 better than the 7870 xt, it's an nvidia title ok But I looked it up and you got 4 percent extra performance, that's like 1 fps more lol, big deal, the numbers speak for itself. Average of 30 fps is not running a game lol, not to pc standards anyway.
Avatar image for deactivated-58e448fd89d82
deactivated-58e448fd89d82

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#509 deactivated-58e448fd89d82
Member since 2010 • 4494 Posts

[QUOTE="AMD655"]

Well, it never goes into single digits, not even once.

 

I know you wish it does, but sadly, nope.

 

evildead6789

sure I don't think the driver will magically make the gtx 480 better than the 7870 xt, it's an nvidia title ok But I looked it up and you got 4 percent extra performance, that's like 1 fps more lol, big deal, the numbers speak for itself. Average of 30 fps is not running a game lol, not to pc standards anyway.

 

Stay mad and in denial.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#510 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

[QUOTE="evildead6789"][QUOTE="AMD655"]

Well, it never goes into single digits, not even once.

 

I know you wish it does, but sadly, nope.

 

AMD655

sure I don't think the driver will magically make the gtx 480 better than the 7870 xt, it's an nvidia title ok But I looked it up and you got 4 percent extra performance, that's like 1 fps more lol, big deal, the numbers speak for itself. Average of 30 fps is not running a game lol, not to pc standards anyway.

 

Stay mad and in denial.

Cry me a river
Avatar image for deactivated-58e448fd89d82
deactivated-58e448fd89d82

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#511 deactivated-58e448fd89d82
Member since 2010 • 4494 Posts

Lol, get's owned with truth, now will not admit defeat.

Avatar image for MlauTheDaft
MlauTheDaft

5189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#512 MlauTheDaft
Member since 2011 • 5189 Posts

[QUOTE="AMD655"]

mWufsLp.jpg

 

 

4bXvYep.jpg

 

JNj3L9q.jpg

 

RngYZvA.jpg

 

mYjIrhx.jpg

evildead6789

 

You only get 50 fps in the menus

40 fps when aiming at someone, can't imagine what happens with explosions in a firefight.

Besides your crysis looks like crap

hwl98z.jpg

4jub1v.jpg

2aeq9kz.jpg

2d82yyx.jpg

2m04qs.jpg

The 50 fps might be V-sync.... I got capped to 50 with that for some reason.

But I agree... DAFUQ is up with those Crysis screens... Vanilla looks better, at least if you bother with your Nvidia control panel....

And I can't agree with that AMD guy's idea that Config editing is modding :? It's litterally just a text file, which the game parses to determine configuration...

Avatar image for deactivated-58e448fd89d82
deactivated-58e448fd89d82

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#513 deactivated-58e448fd89d82
Member since 2010 • 4494 Posts

Quite obvious he has texture mods...ROFL

 

Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#514 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

[QUOTE="AMD655"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"] Videos are normally a bad way of representing frame rates as they can be encoded at a user's set level. I've recorded some MWO games at 45FPS then I drop them to 30FPS to smooth out the judder. clyde46

 

Yup, i encoded it with handbrake though, it is not even edited.

 

What did you encode the video too? And you do know that Youtube limits videos to 30FPS anyway?

 

Yah YouTube limits videos to 30fps so I only record at 30fps.

Here is an old video I did of Crysis 1 with one of my older PC builds that used a GTX 275.

For the best quality choose the Original option when selecting the YouTube video resolution.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLkg97aDr9k

 

And here is a video I made for Crysis 2

Once again for the best quality choose the Original option when selecting the YouTube video resolution.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2F8ct8RlvNM

Avatar image for MlauTheDaft
MlauTheDaft

5189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#515 MlauTheDaft
Member since 2011 • 5189 Posts

Quite obvious he has texture mods...ROFL

 

AMD655

Your foliage still looked worse than vanilla Crysis normally looks and I can only assume you have'nt tweaked you GPU driver settings....

Or does that count as modding? It's still beyond me why you think editing the autoexec.cfg file is a mod :? It's litterally the configuration file for the game and it "mods" it too, when you change something ingame.

Edit:

Not that I think anywone would disagree that Crysis has inconsistant texture quality, to put it nicely.

Avatar image for MlauTheDaft
MlauTheDaft

5189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#517 MlauTheDaft
Member since 2011 • 5189 Posts

[QUOTE="MlauTheDaft"]

[QUOTE="AMD655"]

Quite obvious he has texture mods...ROFL

 

AMD655

Your foliage still looked worse than vanilla Crysis normally looks and I can only assume you have'nt tweaked you GPU driver settings....

Or does that count as modding? It's still beyond me why you think editing the autoexec.cfg file is a mod :? It's litterally the configuration file for the game and it "mods" it too, when you change something ingame.

Edit:

Not that I think anywone would disagree that Crysis has inconsistant texture quality.

 

 

Crysis looks exactly like what i posted, no driver settings do anything to foliage, unless you do not own an Nvidia card? probably why you think it does anything.

 

Only AA and AF are affected through the NVCP.

 

Using a modded file, then saying it looks ugly vanilla is retarded.

Come to think of it, I suppose your issue might be with POM and AF. Those two won't play properly together in vanilla Crysis and you need a hard to find mod, to fix it.

 

I still don't get why manually editing the cfg counts as modding, even in the strictest sense of the term..... It litterally contains the game configuration and if that's modding, so is changing anything ingame.

Avatar image for deactivated-58e448fd89d82
deactivated-58e448fd89d82

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#518 deactivated-58e448fd89d82
Member since 2010 • 4494 Posts

Ok, i have tweaked around a bit, the RELI2 mod was not working properly, neither were the high res textures, but i think i managed to fix it.

 

This i sthe POM+16xAF MOD too.

 

ttxjMgn.jpg

 

bSouxze.jpg

 

HHQPDs0.jpg

 

8DmJaUE.jpg

 

W4guno0.jpg

 

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#519 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

Lol, get's owned with truth, now will not admit defeat.

AMD655
Defeat in what lol All i said was you needed a 7870 to max out crysis at 720p Then you started whining your gtx 480 can max it out at 1080p All that without a single benchmark lol
Avatar image for deactivated-58e448fd89d82
deactivated-58e448fd89d82

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#520 deactivated-58e448fd89d82
Member since 2010 • 4494 Posts

Yes, because reviewers will bench a GTX 480 3 years later.... idiot.

 

The framerate above is telling a different story.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#521 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="AMD655"]

 

Yup, i encoded it with handbrake though, it is not even edited.

 

RyviusARC

What did you encode the video too? And you do know that Youtube limits videos to 30FPS anyway?

 

Yah YouTube limits videos to 30fps so I only record at 30fps.

Here is an old video I did of Crysis 1 with one of my older PC builds that used a GTX 275.

For the best quality choose the Original option when selecting the YouTube video resolution.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLkg97aDr9k

 

And here is a video I made for Crysis 2

Once again for the best quality choose the Original option when selecting the YouTube video resolution.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2F8ct8RlvNM

I will always record at 60FPS if I can get it. Even when I encode it down to 30FPS, it still has that nice silky smooth motion.
Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#522 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

[QUOTE="RyviusARC"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"] What did you encode the video too? And you do know that Youtube limits videos to 30FPS anyway?clyde46

 

Yah YouTube limits videos to 30fps so I only record at 30fps.

Here is an old video I did of Crysis 1 with one of my older PC builds that used a GTX 275.

For the best quality choose the Original option when selecting the YouTube video resolution.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLkg97aDr9k

 

And here is a video I made for Crysis 2

Once again for the best quality choose the Original option when selecting the YouTube video resolution.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2F8ct8RlvNM

I will always record at 60FPS if I can get it. Even when I encode it down to 30FPS, it still has that nice silky smooth motion.

 

1920x1200 at 60fps is too much for my dedicated recording hard drive.

And I am not going to spend the money for a SSD.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#523 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="RyviusARC"]

 

Yah YouTube limits videos to 30fps so I only record at 30fps.

Here is an old video I did of Crysis 1 with one of my older PC builds that used a GTX 275.

For the best quality choose the Original option when selecting the YouTube video resolution.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLkg97aDr9k

 

And here is a video I made for Crysis 2

Once again for the best quality choose the Original option when selecting the YouTube video resolution.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2F8ct8RlvNM

RyviusARC

I will always record at 60FPS if I can get it. Even when I encode it down to 30FPS, it still has that nice silky smooth motion.

 

1920x1200 at 60fps is too much for my dedicated recording hard drive.

And I am not going to spend the money for a SSD.

I record to a simple Samsung 1TB F3. Go run CrystalMark disk benchmark with these settings and tell me what you get. 4GB, 5 times and then hit the SEQ button.
Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#524 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

Yes, because reviewers will bench a GTX 480 3 years later.... idiot.

 

The framerate above is telling a different story.

AMD655
sure and the gtx 480 magically turned into a frog, all because of those three years The driver updates shows 4 percent on the nvidia site. That's one frame on 1080p, give it a rest.
Avatar image for deactivated-58e448fd89d82
deactivated-58e448fd89d82

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#525 deactivated-58e448fd89d82
Member since 2010 • 4494 Posts

[QUOTE="AMD655"]

Yes, because reviewers will bench a GTX 480 3 years later.... idiot.

 

The framerate above is telling a different story.

evildead6789

sure and the gtx 480 magically turned into a frog, all because of those three years The driver updates shows 4 percent on the nvidia site. That's one frame on 1080p, give it a rest.

 

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-drivers-geforce-gtx-480,2875.html

 

bbc2_1680_noaa.png

 

f1_1920_8xmsaa.png

 

 

 

 

Now piss off.

 

 

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#526 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

[QUOTE="evildead6789"][QUOTE="AMD655"]

Yes, because reviewers will bench a GTX 480 3 years later.... idiot.

 

The framerate above is telling a different story.

AMD655

sure and the gtx 480 magically turned into a frog, all because of those three years The driver updates shows 4 percent on the nvidia site. That's one frame on 1080p, give it a rest.

 

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-drivers-geforce-gtx-480,2875.html

 

bbc2_1680_noaa.png

 

f1_1920_8xmsaa.png

 

 

 

 

Now piss off.

 

 

Sorry but those games are not crysis and your link doesn't work... again You kinda fail don't you?
Avatar image for deactivated-58e448fd89d82
deactivated-58e448fd89d82

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#527 deactivated-58e448fd89d82
Member since 2010 • 4494 Posts

No, i actually do not fail at all, you simply look up some old crap from 3 years ago, and use that as proof.

 

You are laughable at best.

 

 

Here, my GTX 480 beats the radeon 7950.

 

Sapphire-Radeon-HD-7950-3DMark11.jpg

 

 

 

 

MY SCORE.

 

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/5654604

 

 

I know full well that a 7950 beats even my OC'd GPU, but i am showing you exactly what you did to me.

 

Old drivers.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#528 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

No, i actually do not fail at all, you simply look up some old crap from 3 years ago, and use that as proof.

You are laughable at best.

Here, my GTX 480 beats the radeon 7950.

MY SCORE.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/5654604

I know full well that a 7950 beats even my OC'd GPU, but i am showing you exactly what you did to me.

Old drivers.

AMD655

http://www.purepc.pl/karty_graficzne/test_vertex3d_hd_7870_xt_black_tahiti_le_prawie_jak_hd_7930?page=0%2C11

vertex3d_hd7870_tahiti_le_gtx_660_test_r

-------------

My Radeon HD 7950 is factory clocked at 900Mhz.

Avatar image for deactivated-58e448fd89d82
deactivated-58e448fd89d82

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#529 deactivated-58e448fd89d82
Member since 2010 • 4494 Posts

Exactly...

 

Driver improve GPU's massively.

 

Benchmarks taken at release are no good indicator of performance, they only count when the GPU first comes out.

Avatar image for XBOunity
XBOunity

3837

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#530 XBOunity
Member since 2013 • 3837 Posts

hermits are the worst man, 500 posts, wow just makes you shake your head, they still think they are the # 1 gaming market as well right?   

Avatar image for MlauTheDaft
MlauTheDaft

5189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#531 MlauTheDaft
Member since 2011 • 5189 Posts

Ok, i have tweaked around a bit, the RELI2 mod was not working properly, neither were the high res textures, but i think i managed to fix it.

 

This i sthe POM+16xAF MOD too.

 

ttxjMgn.jpg

 

bSouxze.jpg

 

HHQPDs0.jpg

 

8DmJaUE.jpg

 

W4guno0.jpg

 

AMD655

That looks like Rygel's texture pack. I'd Install Silent's HD Foliage on top of it ;)

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#532 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

No, i actually do not fail at all, you simply look up some old crap from 3 years ago, and use that as proof.

 

You are laughable at best.

 

 

Here, my GTX 480 beats the radeon 7950.

 

Sapphire-Radeon-HD-7950-3DMark11.jpg

 

 

 

 

MY SCORE.

 

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/5654604

 

 

I know full well that a 7950 beats even my OC'd GPU, but i am showing you exactly what you did to me.

 

Old drivers.

AMD655
Yeah but this is besides the point isn't it, I didn't talk about overclocked cards. And the drivers you like to talk about are not really to be considered here, maybe in other games, but not in crysis lol The gtx 480 at stock even with the new drivers only has like 4 percent increase for crysis http://www.nvidia.com/object/win7-winvista-32bit-258.96-whql-driver.html and this driver is from 2010, it's the last one that did anything for crysis1 or warhead. The only reason you get manageable framerates when you max out crysis is because you overclock, case closed
Avatar image for GD-1369211121
GD-1369211121

4087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#533 GD-1369211121
Member since 2006 • 4087 Posts

Console games will never be better graphically than PC games. Just a fact.

Avatar image for deactivated-58e448fd89d82
deactivated-58e448fd89d82

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#534 deactivated-58e448fd89d82
Member since 2010 • 4494 Posts

This guy is beyond help..

 

Here is those images in action ..

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtkuNmOdRHQ&feature=youtu.be

 

No FPS issues at all, and this game is modded.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33798

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#535 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33798 Posts

Console games will never be better graphically than PC games. Just a fact.

GD-1369211121

 

The PS2 had better graphics than PC at the time of launch,and the xbox 360 as well.

 

But since PC get new GPU every year that advantage is quickly eliminated.

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#536 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

So it will enchance 2-3 years old pcgamers? So impressive...lmao

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#537 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

 

The PS2 had better graphics than PC at the time of launch,and the xbox 360 as well.

 

tormentos

360 didn't. It was the first time console didn't blow pc graphics away at launch. But it was happening regularly before that with PSX, PS3, DC, N64 and Xbox.

Avatar image for Slimmin360
Slimmin360

1933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#538 Slimmin360
Member since 2010 • 1933 Posts

hermits are the worst man, 500 posts, wow just makes you shake your head, they still think they are the # 1 gaming market as well right?   

XBOunity
Yeah it's pretty sad...i think it's hilarious though that they refer to themselves as the master race....that is the funniest thing i've ever heard...LOL.
Avatar image for Benny_Blakk
Benny_Blakk

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#539 Benny_Blakk
Member since 2007 • 910 Posts

You are an idiot if you think that this will last long, if AT ALL.

True story: By the time these consoles launch there will be new video cards on the market that will demolish anything that the consoles can render. On top of that while you are stuck with what's in the console with no option to upgrade, new PC graphics cards will be introduced EVERY YEAR during the entire console life cycle.

We go through this every time a console launches and you dumbasses still haven't figured it out yet.

heretrix

You do know that the Titan is already available for over $1000, right?

Much to your chagrin, not so many people are keen on spending that much for marginal improvements. And that's just the GPU. The other components that you should get along with that would run your PC over $2000, easily.

 

How "ironic" that you PC blowers ALWAYS fail to mention that in your pompous "master race" ignoRANTS.

kudos

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#540 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

[QUOTE="tormentos"]

 

The PS2 had better graphics than PC at the time of launch,and the xbox 360 as well.

 

AdrianWerner

360 didn't. It was the first time console didn't blow pc graphics away at launch. But it was happening regularly before that with PSX, PS3, DC, N64 and Xbox.

Wrong, the 360 version of most games just after release looked better than what was available on PC at the time. It wasn't till AMD and Nvidia made GPU's with the unified shaders did the PC pull ahead.
Avatar image for deactivated-58e448fd89d82
deactivated-58e448fd89d82

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#541 deactivated-58e448fd89d82
Member since 2010 • 4494 Posts

[QUOTE="XBOunity"]

hermits are the worst man, 500 posts, wow just makes you shake your head, they still think they are the # 1 gaming market as well right?   

Slimmin360

Yeah it's pretty sad...i think it's hilarious though that they refer to themselves as the master race....that is the funniest thing i've ever heard...LOL.

 

Stop being jealous.

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#542 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15878 Posts

[QUOTE="XBOunity"]

hermits are the worst man, 500 posts, wow just makes you shake your head, they still think they are the # 1 gaming market as well right?   

Slimmin360

Yeah it's pretty sad...i think it's hilarious though that they refer to themselves as the master race....that is the funniest thing i've ever heard...LOL.

Spoken like a true pleb.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#543 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts
[QUOTE="AMD655"]

No, i actually do not fail at all, you simply look up some old crap from 3 years ago, and use that as proof.

 

You are laughable at best.

 

 

Here, my GTX 480 beats the radeon 7950.

 

Sapphire-Radeon-HD-7950-3DMark11.jpg

 

 

 

 

MY SCORE.

 

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/5654604

 

 

I know full well that a 7950 beats even my OC'd GPU, but i am showing you exactly what you did to me.

 

Old drivers.

evildead6789
Yeah but this is besides the point isn't it, I didn't talk about overclocked cards. And the drivers you like to talk about are not really to be considered here, maybe in other games, but not in crysis lol The gtx 480 at stock even with the new drivers only has like 4 percent increase for crysis http://www.nvidia.com/object/win7-winvista-32bit-258.96-whql-driver.html and this driver is from 2010, it's the last one that did anything for crysis1 or warhead. The only reason you get manageable framerates when you max out crysis is because you overclock, case closed

You could overclock your GPU e.g. I overclocked my 7950 to 1Ghz.
Avatar image for Benny_Blakk
Benny_Blakk

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#544 Benny_Blakk
Member since 2007 • 910 Posts

[QUOTE="XBOunity"]

hermits are the worst man, 500 posts, wow just makes you shake your head, they still think they are the # 1 gaming market as well right?   

Slimmin360

Yeah it's pretty sad...i think it's hilarious though that they refer to themselves as the master race....that is the funniest thing i've ever heard...LOL.

Aryan ideology (embraced by the Nazis) constantly refers to the concept of a "master race".

 Funny, huh?

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#545 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts
[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"]

 

The PS2 had better graphics than PC at the time of launch,and the xbox 360 as well.

 

clyde46

360 didn't. It was the first time console didn't blow pc graphics away at launch. But it was happening regularly before that with PSX, PS3, DC, N64 and Xbox.

Wrong, the 360 version of most games just after release looked better than what was available on PC at the time. It wasn't till AMD and Nvidia made GPU's with the unified shaders did the PC pull ahead.

What games? Launch games didnt take advantage of unified shaders. Quake 4 and Fear were graphics kings of 2005. A 6800gt could run Quake 4 maxed at 720p 60fps while the 360 could barely maintain 30fps at medium settings. Cod 2 pc and console were almost identical graphically but pc allowed for more players in mp.
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#546 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="tormentos"]

The PS2 had better graphics than PC at the time of launch,and the xbox 360 as well.

AdrianWerner

360 didn't. It was the first time console didn't blow pc graphics away at launch. But it was happening regularly before that with PSX, PS3, DC, N64 and Xbox.

ATi has Radeon 8500 with dual vertex pipelines before Xbox (NV2A).

Avatar image for deactivated-58e448fd89d82
deactivated-58e448fd89d82

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#547 deactivated-58e448fd89d82
Member since 2010 • 4494 Posts

PC


> Youtube Play throughs. They needed to be interesting and there is much more scope to edit and record + mod or play non AAA titles on PC

> Minecraft and all the other spin offs (cube world)

> Indie gaming is massive and growing

> Steam ease of use with purchase / installation and now Workshops Mods.

> MODS, keeps games going longer (Skyrim)

> Kickstarter, this is bringing normal people directly into getting games that they want and not shoved on people like big license console games

> Older games back catalog compatibility, consoles may in future play games from the prior gen now there x86, but as it stands ultra casuals cant play their old games on the new platform..

> The Internet in general with server forums and clans / team discussions / review sites / gaming culture, sub culture

> Development work on pc to make things for phones

> Cheap games!

> Free games!

> no online registration costs

> Consoles cost almost as much as a decent gaming PC primarily because they are morphing into a decent gaming PC but with less choice and more of flashy / ultra casual approach + media APPS. Once you spent $500 on a console and bought a few extra controllers / cameras / chargers etc.. the cheaper games of the more expensive PC starts to balance out.

Its not a hard choice, buy a Media box for 99$ that will take your TV streams or a smart TV or an OUYA(and mod) or a RaspberyPi or even a HDMi wireless phone dongle for 10$ and use your PC for games thumb.gif

The days of things crashing out and not installing are gone and even so there is lots of help now people are online in order to get things working (which is rare)


ohh forgot to mention other advantages..

your own monitor resolution choice,
your own choice of how many screens you want,
your own mouse, keyboard,controller choice,
your own head set and mic choice

VR headsets and motion control stuff etc..



Graphics? not even close.


LL


LL


Game from 2007.

Avatar image for NFJSupreme
NFJSupreme

6605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#548 NFJSupreme
Member since 2005 • 6605 Posts
i didn't read through this thread but are people really believing that consoles will have more graphical features than PC? If so SW has truly gone mad.
Avatar image for Slimmin360
Slimmin360

1933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#549 Slimmin360
Member since 2010 • 1933 Posts
Blaming a drive failure on a virus. Now I've seen it all. clyde46
Yet another massive Pro for Consoles.... They don't get viruses, that in and of itself is enough reason to go the console route. Who the hell wants to be bothered with Anti-virus software,,,being run and scanned and all that crap when your trying to play games.
Avatar image for deactivated-58e448fd89d82
deactivated-58e448fd89d82

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#550 deactivated-58e448fd89d82
Member since 2010 • 4494 Posts

[QUOTE="clyde46"]Blaming a drive failure on a virus. Now I've seen it all. Slimmin360
Yet another massive Pro for Consoles.... They don't get viruses, that in and of itself is enough reason to go the console route. Who the hell wants to be bothered with Anti-virus software,,,being run and scanned and all that crap when your trying to play games.

 

Seems you still live in pre-historic world.