Gamespot uses the term "console exclusive"....

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for STRETCH-E
STRETCH-E

631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#201 STRETCH-E
Member since 2009 • 631 Posts

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="-RPGamer-"]

Why do people complain about this? A console exclusive is a viable phrase that is factual if a game exists on console X and the PC. Not to mention while we game on PC, consoles, and handhelds they're related markets but not one and the same. A console exclusive has an effect, I know a portion of SW wants to never admit this b/c of some lame agenda.

-RPGamer-

This is pretty much how I feel on the matter. If people really think that the idea of a "console exclusive" is one that doesn't exist outside of System Wars, those people are sorely mistaken. One trip into the average retailer will show you that they consider the PC and console markets almost completely separate from one another. The fact that gaming websites, as well as executives from both Sony and Microsoft, use the term "console exclusive" is more proof in and of itself.

Exactly, a few Best Buy stores in my area are a good example. The consoles are all in one section, while the PC content is in an entriely different side of the store.

My Best Buy has all of their videogames in the same section. PS3/PSP rows, 360 rows, Wii/DS rows and PC rows.

Avatar image for anshul89
anshul89

5705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#202 anshul89
Member since 2006 • 5705 Posts

Technically fine. But this is the english language and technically doesn't equal absolute truth all over. The fact that the members of the warring factions use this term means it has weight and validity to them. And they have weight and validity in their "war" because they're in it. They are the front lines. We are the prize. I go with the SW way as it's not exclusive here, but not because it's a fact everywhere. It simply isn't.cainetao11
No. It's just BS pr talk.

Avatar image for -RPGamer-
-RPGamer-

34283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

#203 -RPGamer-
Member since 2002 • 34283 Posts

So, you don't follow the rules, good for you. Now please tell me why everyone else shouldn't?jonnyt61

What rules? The made up ones?I know PC exists, I know consoles exist, and yes they can be compared. That does not mean that we can't take viable factors like what we're discussing here and consider them.

Avatar image for Ryuuichi009
Ryuuichi009

219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#204 Ryuuichi009
Member since 2008 • 219 Posts

I keep forgetting all the fanboy rage that blinds the common sense here in system wars. -_-

Avatar image for -RPGamer-
-RPGamer-

34283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

#205 -RPGamer-
Member since 2002 • 34283 Posts

My Best Buy has all of their videogames in the same section. PS3/PSP rows, 360 rows, Wii/DS rows and PC rows.

STRETCH-E

That's fine the ones in my area do not, it was merely an example.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#206 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38063 Posts
Dude you got me wrong! I have repeatedly said these games are not exclusive here at SW. I am saying that trying to make this undisputed fact will not work, since the english language can always be spun and contexted another way. How is a game not exclusive to 360 and PC if it excludes the Wii and PS3? The words and definitions can be used that way. It just isn't accepted here and I go by SW. That's all that needs to be said. Here, at SW it is not defined as such.
Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#207 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
this is in fact realy simple if a game is on pc 360 cow are angry if a game is on ps3 360 than hermit are angry 2 faction against 1 .this is the truth of system war .legol1
At the end of the day cows need to hide behind the PC vs the 360 and need the 360 to hide behind vs the PC, a straight up comparison of libraries is not favourable for them. I do think console exclusive is an unecessary term really outside of MS/Sony PR and SW, however.
Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#208 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38063 Posts

[QUOTE="cainetao11"]Technically fine. But this is the english language and technically doesn't equal absolute truth all over. The fact that the members of the warring factions use this term means it has weight and validity to them. And they have weight and validity in their "war" because they're in it. They are the front lines. We are the prize. I go with the SW way as it's not exclusive here, but not because it's a fact everywhere. It simply isn't.anshul89

No. It's just BS pr talk.

OL, forgive us our sins, Almighty one......please.
Avatar image for -RPGamer-
-RPGamer-

34283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

#209 -RPGamer-
Member since 2002 • 34283 Posts

The console part wasn't intended at you- just to add to the main discussion. It highlights why "console exclusive" means nothing in the real world- they're not compelling reasons to pick up a 360. Infamous maybe is for someone on the PS3, but Alan Wake doesn't force me to buy a 360. So because some people are close minded and can't accept the fact that the PC plays games, we should somehow disregard it for those people? Well I declare the 360 a media center and not a gaming system, so therefore it's not part of the console wars. Heck, you could eliminate any system by that standard- the Wii is too weak to be counted as a current gen system, so we don't need to count that. The PS3 really is just a gussied up Blu Ray player, so we can exclude that (and it can be used as a PC). The 360 is just a home entertainment device like a settop box, so exclude that. The PC is too multipurpose to be considered a player in system wars, so we can exclude that. I've single-handedly ended system wars because I found reasons to exclude them all. And to drop some of the sarcasm, your assertion that some gamers would exclude the PC is one that can't be backed up with any evidence. How many gamers do this? Is it a majority? Until we know that kind of information, it's hard to take your speculation seriously. Fortunately you made my point- people here do consider the PC a system. And since we're here discussing this topic, you've accepted that the PC is a platform for gaming. Therefore, all those 360/PC games are just multiplats. You're free to create your own console wars board where you can better represent society and exclude the PC if you'd like.LongZhiZi

It's not that people don't accept PC can play games, there exist people that do not want or think they know how to play games ona PC. There are many console only gamers, why is this so difficult for people to understand? I'm not saying the PC doesn't exist, nor am I saying that PC and consoles don't compete. I'm saying both sides exist, it's not black and white like many of you here attempt to make it out to be. You're welcome to join me in reality.

Avatar image for jonnyt61
jonnyt61

2147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#210 jonnyt61
Member since 2003 • 2147 Posts

[QUOTE="jonnyt61"] So, you don't follow the rules, good for you. Now please tell me why everyone else shouldn't?-RPGamer-

What rules? The made up ones?I know PC exists, I know consoles exist, and yes they can be compared. That does not mean that we can't take viable factors like what we're discussing here and consider them.

This should tell you

Claiming a console exclusive is essentially pretending the PC doesn't exist for that persons arguement in favor of their system. As stated in that thread, which, obviously is mod approved, excluding the PC from being included, can be considered off-topic.

Standing by console exclusive, is basically saying you don't agree with the PC being included in that arguement.

Avatar image for double-r
double-r

398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#211 double-r
Member since 2004 • 398 Posts

lol at lemmings what im seeing is with out pc/360 "exclusive" the 360 is nothing lol.

if lemmings had any pride they would accept that the pc is a gaming platform and just end the argument.

if i can play a game on another system even if that other system is a calculater it is not exclusive

Avatar image for -RPGamer-
-RPGamer-

34283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

#212 -RPGamer-
Member since 2002 • 34283 Posts

[QUOTE="-RPGamer-"]

[QUOTE="jonnyt61"] So, you don't follow the rules, good for you. Now please tell me why everyone else shouldn't?jonnyt61

What rules? The made up ones?I know PC exists, I know consoles exist, and yes they can be compared. That does not mean that we can't take viable factors like what we're discussing here and consider them.

This should tell you

Claiming a console exclusive is essentially pretending the PC doesn't exist for that persons arguement in favor of their system. As stated in that thread, which, obviously is mod approved, excluding the PC from being included, can be considered off-topic.

Standing by console exclusive, is basically saying you don't agree with the PC being included in that arguement.

No I know the PC exists, the phrase console exclusive is a factual phrase for some games. I'm not saying that for some gamers the console exclusive doesn't matter. I'm saying that for some gamers it does, this is reality. If saying something that is a viable factor in a real life scenario is trolling than I have an issue with that type of moderation.

I don't have a favor on systems, I love PC gaming. You're another person here who thinks everything is black and white, and I'm saying that you can consider both.

Avatar image for agentfred
agentfred

5666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#213 agentfred
Member since 2003 • 5666 Posts

It's not that people don't accept PC can play games, there exist people that do not want or think they know how to play games ona PC. There are many console only gamers, why is this so difficult for people to understand? I'm not saying the PC doesn't exist, nor am I saying that PC and consoles don't compete. I'm saying both sides exist, it's not black and white like many of you here attempt to make it out to be. You're welcome to join me in reality.

-RPGamer-

So you're saying that a console only gamer (someone who only games on consoles) doesn't factor PCs into the equation, thus, making PC/360 games exclusive. Using this same reasoning, wouldn't a 360 only gamer (someone who only owns a 360) consider FF13 to be a 360 exclusive? For that matter, you could just declare yourself any kind of gamer you want, and start considering every game you own an exclusive title. I mean, I guess you could do this, but it kinda defeats the purpose of saying "exclusive".

Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#214 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

It's not that people don't accept PC can play games, there exist people that do not want or think they know how to play games ona PC. There are many console only gamers, why is this so difficult for people to understand? I'm not saying the PC doesn't exist, nor am I saying that PC and consoles don't compete. I'm saying both sides exist, it's not black and white like many of you here attempt to make it out to be. You're welcome to join me in reality.

-RPGamer-

I dont really believe that your argument holds much merit simply because its based on a flawed premise and/or the ignorance of the user.

Why are there console only gamers? Sometimes theres good reason, some times the reasons arent very good. But that really doesnt have any bearing on the fact that i can walk into a store, pick up a PC or a console game, play it once i get home, and have essentially the same gamplay experience.

Their reasons for not choosing a PC, regardless of their validity, does not change that. Giving validity to "console exclusive" just gives an excuse to create a seperation where none has to exist.

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#215 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
[QUOTE="XaosII"]

[QUOTE="-RPGamer-"]

It's not that people don't accept PC can play games, there exist people that do not want or think they know how to play games ona PC. There are many console only gamers, why is this so difficult for people to understand? I'm not saying the PC doesn't exist, nor am I saying that PC and consoles don't compete. I'm saying both sides exist, it's not black and white like many of you here attempt to make it out to be. You're welcome to join me in reality.

I dont really believe that your argument holds much merit simply because its based on a flawed premise and/or the ignorance of the user.

Why are there console only gamers? Sometimes theres good reason, some times the reasons arent very good. But that really doesnt have any bearing on the fact that i can walk into a store, pick up a PC or a console game, play it once i get home, and have essentially the same gamplay experience.

Their reasons for not choosing a PC, regardless of their validity, does not change that. Giving validity to "console exclusive" just gives an excuse to create a seperation where none has to exist.

I think that though no separation has to exist, but it does for many. For that reason, for the reality on the ground rather than the technical possibilities, I think that "console exclusive" is a valid term. If a restaurant further defines itself by saying "vegetarian restaurant", would this be a problem? For some, vegetarianism is a religious enforced thing, but for many its a pure choice. They COULD eat meat, but they don't for their own personal reasons. This alone makes it valid to call it a vegetarian restaurant rather than just a restaurant. Why do consolites not get with the PC? Who the hell knows... but the fact that they don't makes console exclusive a meaningful term in their lives.
Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#216 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
[QUOTE="agentfred"]

[QUOTE="-RPGamer-"]It's not that people don't accept PC can play games, there exist people that do not want or think they know how to play games ona PC. There are many console only gamers, why is this so difficult for people to understand? I'm not saying the PC doesn't exist, nor am I saying that PC and consoles don't compete. I'm saying both sides exist, it's not black and white like many of you here attempt to make it out to be. You're welcome to join me in reality.

So you're saying that a console only gamer (someone who only games on consoles) doesn't factor PCs into the equation, thus, making PC/360 games exclusive. Using this same reasoning, wouldn't a 360 only gamer (someone who only owns a 360) consider FF13 to be a 360 exclusive? For that matter, you could just declare yourself any kind of gamer you want, and start considering every game you own an exclusive title. I mean, I guess you could do this, but it kinda defeats the purpose of saying "exclusive".

I think that the difference is that consolites don't game on the PC for reasons such as intimidation with the technology, perceptions of expense, ignorance, and most probably a combination of all and other factors. Such a distinction doesn't exist between the 360 and PS3, and in fact most consolites probably made a choice between the three major players.
Avatar image for Javy03
Javy03

6886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#217 Javy03
Member since 2006 • 6886 Posts
[QUOTE="legol1"]this is in fact realy simple if a game is on pc 360 cow are angry if a game is on ps3 360 than hermit are angry 2 faction against 1 .this is the truth of system war .blue_hazy_basic
At the end of the day cows need to hide behind the PC vs the 360 and need the 360 to hide behind vs the PC, a straight up comparison of libraries is not favourable for them. I do think console exclusive is an unecessary term really outside of MS/Sony PR and SW, however.

LOL....actually the hiding that is being done is by MS fanboys. They wanna sweep the PC under the carpet and pretend it doesn't exist to fluff up their game lists. The game on the 360 is the exact same one on the PC yet somehow people like you can justify selective comparisons. Sorry I still don't know how MS fans can look down at Sony fans for following the rules of SW. It's the same game on another platform, its multiplat, the hiding is being done by MS fanboys, hiding behind semantics.
Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#218 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7054 Posts

[QUOTE="-RPGamer-"]

It's not that people don't accept PC can play games, there exist people that do not want or think they know how to play games ona PC. There are many console only gamers, why is this so difficult for people to understand? I'm not saying the PC doesn't exist, nor am I saying that PC and consoles don't compete. I'm saying both sides exist, it's not black and white like many of you here attempt to make it out to be. You're welcome to join me in reality.

XaosII

I dont really believe that your argument holds much merit simply because its based on a flawed premise and/or the ignorance of the user.

Why are there console only gamers? Sometimes theres good reason, some times the reasons arent very good. But that really doesnt have any bearing on the fact that i can walk into a store, pick up a PC or a console game, play it once i get home, and have essentially the same gamplay experience.

Their reasons for not choosing a PC, regardless of their validity, does not change that. Giving validity to "console exclusive" just gives an excuse to create a seperation where none has to exist.

There aren't console exclusives. That isn't the problem.

The problem is that exclusives are not the only games in the game library, and multiplats can have as much influence as exclusives on purchase decisions. The endless battles over lists of exclusives are not accurate in assessing what the potential total game experience is on any system. Yet, the list of exclusives is used over and over again as some form of ownage....my system is better than yours because I have more exclusives.....which is potentially the equivalent of saying my system is better because it has more games with white covers.

And therein lies the problem with exclusive.

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#219 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"][QUOTE="legol1"]this is in fact realy simple if a game is on pc 360 cow are angry if a game is on ps3 360 than hermit are angry 2 faction against 1 .this is the truth of system war .Javy03
At the end of the day cows need to hide behind the PC vs the 360 and need the 360 to hide behind vs the PC, a straight up comparison of libraries is not favourable for them. I do think console exclusive is an unecessary term really outside of MS/Sony PR and SW, however.

LOL....actually the hiding that is being done is by MS fanboys. They wanna sweep the PC under the carpet and pretend it doesn't exist to fluff up their game lists. The game on the 360 is the exact same one on the PC yet somehow people like you can justify selective comparisons. Sorry I still don't know how MS fans can look down at Sony fans for following the rules of SW. It's the same game on another platform, its multiplat, the hiding is being done by MS fanboys, hiding behind semantics.

If a lemming is using console exclusive out of insecurity, it is indeed hiding. If they are using it out of an understanding that there is a significant population that are consolites and that therefore console exclusive has a real world applicable meaning to that population, then it is not hiding. Whatever term is used, I find cows to be more disingenuous by dismissing 360/PC games as "multiplats" (or pretending that they don't even exist altogether) than their lemming counterparts are. Nevermind the extensive list of multiplats that are shared with the PS3 yet are superior on the 360...
Avatar image for Hanass
Hanass

2204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#221 Hanass
Member since 2008 • 2204 Posts

[QUOTE="-RPGamer-"]

[QUOTE="LongZhiZi"] That "lame agenda," as you call it, is better known as logic. Again, the reason it's nonsense to refer to something as "console exclusive" is the fact that it's on multiple platforms. The ONLY console I don't own right now is the 360. Want to guess why? Because almost all of its "exclusives" wind up on PC or the PS3. Now, you might say, "but you could've just bought the 360 instead of the PS3 nad PC." But here's the real deal: I bought the PC for its exclusives, such as Crysis, Civilization series, Vampire the Masquerade- Bloodlines, and STALKER. And I find the multiplats on it to be superior. So the PC was a *must.* I bought the PS3 for its exclusives, like LittleBigPlanet, Valkyria Chronicles, Demon's Souls, Warhawk, and the Last Guardian. The PS3 was a *must.* I bought the Wii for its exclusives, like Wii Sports and various other Nintendo games. Plus my girlfriend wanted it. So the Wii was a *must.* I didn't buy the 360 because there's nothing left to compel me to purchase it. Why buy a 360 for Conviction since it's going to wind up on the PC? Or Alan Wake? You see, trying to argue PS3 vs 360 only is like arguing in a bubble. Theoretically you could, but in the real world, it doesn't work out that way. LIkewise, to say that gamers can only choose one platform to game on is only theoretical. MS has not convinced me to purchase a 360 with their exclusives.LongZhiZi

There's nothing logical about saying the console exclusivity has no play in the console market. Not all gamers consider PC as a gamign platform, end of story. Yes people here do, we're more than likely some of the most dedicated (maybe to a fault) gamers, but that does not mean we are the norm.

I don't care what consoles you own or do not own, that information that is one example of millions of different gamers. Further more I could care less what a company has convinced you to do, I made my statements console neutral for a reason. :|

The console part wasn't intended at you- just to add to the main discussion. It highlights why "console exclusive" means nothing in the real world- they're not compelling reasons to pick up a 360. Infamous maybe is for someone on the PS3, but Alan Wake doesn't force me to buy a 360. So because some people are close minded and can't accept the fact that the PC plays games, we should somehow disregard it for those people? Well I declare the 360 a media center and not a gaming system, so therefore it's not part of the console wars. Heck, you could eliminate any system by that standard- the Wii is too weak to be counted as a current gen system, so we don't need to count that. The PS3 really is just a gussied up Blu Ray player, so we can exclude that (and it can be used as a PC). The 360 is just a home entertainment device like a settop box, so exclude that. The PC is too multipurpose to be considered a player in system wars, so we can exclude that. I've single-handedly ended system wars because I found reasons to exclude them all. And to drop some of the sarcasm, your assertion that some gamers would exclude the PC is one that can't be backed up with any evidence. How many gamers do this? Is it a majority? Until we know that kind of information, it's hard to take your speculation seriously. Fortunately you made my point- people here do consider the PC a system. And since we're here discussing this topic, you've accepted that the PC is a platform for gaming. Therefore, all those 360/PC games are just multiplats. You're free to create your own console wars board where you can better represent society and exclude the PC if you'd like.

HAHA looks like someone got owned! No wait, it's "some people", as in everybody here who is trying to justify the expression "console exclusive"

Avatar image for opex07
opex07

2236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#222 opex07
Member since 2007 • 2236 Posts

LOL....actually the hiding that is being done is by MS fanboys. They wanna sweep the PC under the carpet and pretend it doesn't exist to fluff up their game lists. The game on the 360 is the exact same one on the PC yet somehow people like you can justify selective comparisons. Sorry I still don't know how MS fans can look down at Sony fans for following the rules of SW. It's the same game on another platform, its multiplat, the hiding is being done by MS fanboys, hiding behind semantics.Javy03

The 360 can play any PC/360 title, therefor 360 owners don't need to involve the PC to play such a title. PS3 owners have to bring up the PC in order to discredit the titles, even though they are not on their system of choice.

If 360 owners wanted to indeed act like the PC didn't exist then there would be no need for the word "console exclusive" it would simply be an exclusive game.

Avatar image for Hanass
Hanass

2204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#223 Hanass
Member since 2008 • 2204 Posts

[QUOTE="Javy03"] LOL....actually the hiding that is being done is by MS fanboys. They wanna sweep the PC under the carpet and pretend it doesn't exist to fluff up their game lists. The game on the 360 is the exact same one on the PC yet somehow people like you can justify selective comparisons. Sorry I still don't know how MS fans can look down at Sony fans for following the rules of SW. It's the same game on another platform, its multiplat, the hiding is being done by MS fanboys, hiding behind semantics.opex07

The 360 can play any PC/360 title, therefor 360 owners don't need to involve the PC to play such a title. PS3 owners have to bring up the PC in order to discredit the titles, even though they are not on their system of choice.

If 360 owners wanted to indeed act like the PC didn't exist then there would be no need for the word "console exclusive" it would simply be an exclusive game.

Except that only saying "exclusive" would arouse far too much supicion, so it's slightly more subtle to say "console exclusive".

Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#224 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7054 Posts

The best hypocrites are some hermits

Thread A: PC rocks cause I get all these exclusives, plus I get all the best 360 games as multiplats. LOL. I've got the best library by far. You all suck.

Thread B: Whatchya talking 'bout? Oh, PS3 vs 360. Only exclusives count. Lulz.

Thread A translation: my total game library is the best.

Thread B translation: only exclusives matter.

There's nothing wrong with the SW exclusive definition. It just doesn't matter much.

My system has more exclusives. Yippee. My system has more games with white covers. Yippee. They both conform to a rule/definition. Neither necessarily says how good the potential game experience is on one system relative to another.

Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#225 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

I think that though no separation has to exist, but it does for many. For that reason, for the reality on the ground rather than the technical possibilities, I think that "console exclusive" is a valid term. If a restaurant further defines itself by saying "vegetarian restaurant", would this be a problem? For some, vegetarianism is a religious enforced thing, but for many its a pure choice. They COULD eat meat, but they don't for their own personal reasons. This alone makes it valid to call it a vegetarian restaurant rather than just a restaurant. Why do consolites not get with the PC? Who the hell knows... but the fact that they don't makes console exclusive a meaningful term in their lives.dsmccracken

I think you are playing s semantics game here. Arguing over the semantics is a bit meaningless.

I could just as easily give the argument that a "vegetarian resturant" is a subset of a restaurant and is therefore a restaurant. A PS3 is a "console gaming platform" and a PC is a "computer gaming platform" but both are subsets of gaming platforms. A distinction exists, but that does not mean its no longer what it is. You can still go to a non vegetarian restaurant and order a salad.

But thats just toying with semantics.

Avatar image for -RPGamer-
-RPGamer-

34283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

#226 -RPGamer-
Member since 2002 • 34283 Posts

[QUOTE="-RPGamer-"]It's not that people don't accept PC can play games, there exist people that do not want or think they know how to play games ona PC. There are many console only gamers, why is this so difficult for people to understand? I'm not saying the PC doesn't exist, nor am I saying that PC and consoles don't compete. I'm saying both sides exist, it's not black and white like many of you here attempt to make it out to be. You're welcome to join me in reality.

agentfred

So you're saying that a console only gamer (someone who only games on consoles) doesn't factor PCs into the equation, thus, making PC/360 games exclusive. Using this same reasoning, wouldn't a 360 only gamer (someone who only owns a 360) consider FF13 to be a 360 exclusive? For that matter, you could just declare yourself any kind of gamer you want, and start considering every game you own an exclusive title. I mean, I guess you could do this, but it kinda defeats the purpose of saying "exclusive".

B/c I'm not just using the word "exclusive", I'm using the phrase "console exclusive". Exclusive in your example for the Xbox 360 (or any system) doesn't say what it's exclusive compared to.

Avatar image for -RPGamer-
-RPGamer-

34283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

#227 -RPGamer-
Member since 2002 • 34283 Posts

[QUOTE="-RPGamer-"]

It's not that people don't accept PC can play games, there exist people that do not want or think they know how to play games ona PC. There are many console only gamers, why is this so difficult for people to understand? I'm not saying the PC doesn't exist, nor am I saying that PC and consoles don't compete. I'm saying both sides exist, it's not black and white like many of you here attempt to make it out to be. You're welcome to join me in reality.

XaosII

I dont really believe that your argument holds much merit simply because its based on a flawed premise and/or the ignorance of the user.

Why are there console only gamers? Sometimes theres good reason, some times the reasons arent very good. But that really doesnt have any bearing on the fact that i can walk into a store, pick up a PC or a console game, play it once i get home, and have essentially the same gamplay experience.

Their reasons for not choosing a PC, regardless of their validity, does not change that. Giving validity to "console exclusive" just gives an excuse to create a seperation where none has to exist.

So you're saying ignorance doesn't exist? Why does it matter if the demographic exists, when the fact is that it does. I know you can pick up either, I've already said that some gamers do this and make that descission.

Seperation exists, b/c the seperation is actually there (regradless of how the seperation was created).

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#228 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"]I think that though no separation has to exist, but it does for many. For that reason, for the reality on the ground rather than the technical possibilities, I think that "console exclusive" is a valid term. If a restaurant further defines itself by saying "vegetarian restaurant", would this be a problem? For some, vegetarianism is a religious enforced thing, but for many its a pure choice. They COULD eat meat, but they don't for their own personal reasons. This alone makes it valid to call it a vegetarian restaurant rather than just a restaurant. Why do consolites not get with the PC? Who the hell knows... but the fact that they don't makes console exclusive a meaningful term in their lives.XaosII

I think you are playing s semantics game here. Arguing over the semantics is a bit meaningless.

I could just as easily give the argument that a "vegetarian resturant" is a subset of a restaurant and is therefore a restaurant. A PS3 is a "console gaming platform" and a PC is a "computer gaming platform" but both are subsets of gaming platforms. A distinction exists, but that does not mean its no longer what it is. You can still go to a non vegetarian restaurant and order a salad.

But thats just toying with semantics.

If you guys want to be gungho about semantics, PCs are consoles.
Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#229 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
The issue of "console exclusive" is not a SW issue, nor is it a gaming issue. It is a language issue. Language is meant to describe something. So ask yourself, does "console exclusive" describe something? Do we understand (i.e. is it clear) what it is describing? Does another current word (or phrase) in the vocabulary describe that thing already? Opponents of "console exclusive" would indeed argue that there already is a word: MULTIPLAT. But does multiplat do an adequate job in every circumstance, and for all parties? Does it tell the whole story? Dismissing a game like ME as "just another multiplat", like it is Madden and on all systems across the board, seems to me to be disingenuous. If there are consolites out there (and there are), calling such a game multiplat is about as useful and meaningful to them as an umbrella in the Sahara. Hermits (or those masquerading as Hermits) would tell you that console exclusive is an insidious attempt to dismiss them. In truth, the opposite is true. Trying to restrict console exclusive is dismissive of those who are in fact consolites and for whom the phrase has a real world practical application and meaning. In the end, "console exclusive" is just language. It's not offensive or pejorative in any way. For the most part, most (not all) who have a problem with it are those who have agendas which are somehow threatened by the concept, and by the reprecussions of the adoption, of said language.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#230 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="dsmccracken"]. In the end, "console exclusive" is just language. It's not offensive or pejorative in any way. For the most part, most (not all) who have a problem with it are those who have agendas which are somehow threatened by the concept, and by the reprecussions of the adoption, of said language.

And if you want to be formal about language, according to modern english vernacular, consoles include PCs.
Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#231 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7054 Posts

[QUOTE="-RPGamer-"]It's not that people don't accept PC can play games, there exist people that do not want or think they know how to play games ona PC. There are many console only gamers, why is this so difficult for people to understand? I'm not saying the PC doesn't exist, nor am I saying that PC and consoles don't compete. I'm saying both sides exist, it's not black and white like many of you here attempt to make it out to be. You're welcome to join me in reality.

agentfred

So you're saying that a console only gamer (someone who only games on consoles) doesn't factor PCs into the equation, thus, making PC/360 games exclusive. Using this same reasoning, wouldn't a 360 only gamer (someone who only owns a 360) consider FF13 to be a 360 exclusive? For that matter, you could just declare yourself any kind of gamer you want, and start considering every game you own an exclusive title. I mean, I guess you could do this, but it kinda defeats the purpose of saying "exclusive".

What is the purpose of saying exclusive? What does it matter if a game is exclusive or not? This is the key to the discussion....not the definition of exclusive.

Pls respond without using the definition of exclusive. I already know the definition, and I already agree with it. I want to know what you think the point of exclsuive is...without a circular definitional discussion.

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#232 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"]I think that though no separation has to exist, but it does for many. For that reason, for the reality on the ground rather than the technical possibilities, I think that "console exclusive" is a valid term. If a restaurant further defines itself by saying "vegetarian restaurant", would this be a problem? For some, vegetarianism is a religious enforced thing, but for many its a pure choice. They COULD eat meat, but they don't for their own personal reasons. This alone makes it valid to call it a vegetarian restaurant rather than just a restaurant. Why do consolites not get with the PC? Who the hell knows... but the fact that they don't makes console exclusive a meaningful term in their lives.XaosII

I think you are playing s semantics game here. Arguing over the semantics is a bit meaningless.

I could just as easily give the argument that a "vegetarian resturant" is a subset of a restaurant and is therefore a restaurant. A PS3 is a "console gaming platform" and a PC is a "computer gaming platform" but both are subsets of gaming platforms. A distinction exists, but that does not mean its no longer what it is. You can still go to a non vegetarian restaurant and order a salad.

But thats just toying with semantics.

Since semantics is about word selection and meaning, I'd say that is not just what I'm doing, but what I SHOULD be doing when analyzing the phrase in question. And you make my point, really, a vegetarian restaurant is indeed a restaurant... but the point is that "restaurant" doesn't really tell all there is to tell, it is not the full story. Likewise, a console exclusive is indeed a multiplat, but not all multiplats are created equal, it is not a one-size-fits-all phrase and is not fully descriptive of the reality.
Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#233 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
[QUOTE="dsmccracken"]. In the end, "console exclusive" is just language. It's not offensive or pejorative in any way. For the most part, most (not all) who have a problem with it are those who have agendas which are somehow threatened by the concept, and by the reprecussions of the adoption, of said language.Vandalvideo
And if you want to be formal about language, according to modern english vernacular, consoles include PCs.

Yes, as well as cell phones, though in practice who among us would call a cell phone a console?
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#234 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="dsmccracken"] Yes, as well as cell phones, though in practice who among us would call a cell phone a console?

Me, because I try to use proper english. Console exclusive, technically speaking, is a vacuous statement. We may not like it, but the old idea of consoles died off when Skus, installations, updates, multimedia functions, and marketplaces began to open up on what we used to consider consoles. If we want to have a taxonomy which includes Wii, 360, and PS3 we have to compensate for these wildly divergent trends. The modern definition, as loose as it is, includes PCs, Cellphones, and other devices; some even handheld. The old concept of consoles is dead.
Avatar image for opex07
opex07

2236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#235 opex07
Member since 2007 • 2236 Posts

Except that only saying "exclusive" would arouse far too much supicion, so it's slightly more subtle to say "console exclusive".

Hanass

suspicion from who, and of what? I'm not too sure what your trying to say.

Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#236 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

There aren't console exclusives. That isn't the problem.

The problem is that exclusives are not the only games in the game library, and multiplats can have as much influence as exclusives on purchase decisions. The endless battles over lists of exclusives are not accurate in assessing what the potential total game experience is on any system. Yet, the list of exclusives is used over and over again as some form of ownage....my system is better than yours because I have more exclusives.....which is potentially the equivalent of saying my system is better because it has more games with white covers.

And therein lies the problem with exclusive.

SUD123456

I think you touching on a bit of a different issue that requires its own analysis.

I think you are ultimately asking "what is the value of X system?" I dont believe that we really have any kind of objective measurement or rubric to judge that definitively. We'll probably never get one. So we make fairly arbitrary rules to try and decide that. Is there a value to the wii's small size and easy portability in the event you want to bring it to a friends house? Absolutely. but just how much value does that hold? Alot for some, very little for others. How can we measure that?

At the very least, every person on this forum is very interested in gaming. We all value good games. We trust this site to make good judgments on declaring good games and bad games. Although we dont all always agree with their judgments, their values represent a quantitative measuring point. At that point we can create numerical comparative measurements. If we can compare one system to having more good games compared to another system that does not have as many good games, i think most us can agree that the system with more good games is the better system - since good games are what hold the most value for most of us in a system. Good exlcusive games help tilt that scale. since the same good game on two system just means +1 for both as opposed to +1 for one and not the other.

So i think there is merit in a list of good exlcusive games. Its not the only factor. But there arent many other factors that we have solid quantitative date that we can make a definitive comparison. Sales numbers, number of exclusive titles, and the price of the system are all easy things to compare and get straight answer. We cant do the same with more abstract values like frequency of disc switching, ease of portability, appeal of interface, hardware reliability, etc.

Avatar image for agentfred
agentfred

5666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#237 agentfred
Member since 2003 • 5666 Posts

B/c I'm not just using the word "exclusive", I'm using the phrase "console exclusive". Exclusive in your example for the Xbox 360 (or any system) doesn't say what it's exclusive compared to.

-RPGamer-

Well, I suppose you could use any arbitrary classification you want (just like the "console" classification). For instance, (as suggested earlier in this thread) we could start classifying games by the color of the system it's on. Therefore, FF13 would be a "white system exclusive" for the 360. You can't find FF13 on any other white system, can you? :P

Well, it's the same concept. The idea of classifying systems based on whether they are consoles is just as arbitrary and meaningless as the color of the system.

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#238 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
[QUOTE="dsmccracken"] Yes, as well as cell phones, though in practice who among us would call a cell phone a console?Vandalvideo
Me, because I try to use proper english. Console exclusive, technically speaking, is a vacuous statement. We may not like it, but the old idea of consoles died off when Skus, installations, updates, multimedia functions, and marketplaces began to open up on what we used to consider consoles. If we want to have a taxonomy which includes Wii, 360, and PS3 we have to compensate for these wildly divergent trends. The modern definition, as loose as it is, includes PCs, Cellphones, and other devices; some even handheld. The old concept of consoles is dead.

The truth about the old concept of consoles is dead, I agree. But since most here talk as if it were still alive, we pretty much have to act likewise or every conversation will be fruitless.
Avatar image for agentfred
agentfred

5666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#239 agentfred
Member since 2003 • 5666 Posts

If you guys want to be gungho about semantics, PCs are consoles.Vandalvideo
That's not what Wikipedia tells me:

"The term "video game console" is used to distinguish a machine designed for consumers to buy and use solely for playing video games from a personal computer, which has many other functions, or arcade machines, which are designed for businesses that buy and then charge others to play."

And everyone knows that Wikipedia is always right. :P

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#240 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="dsmccracken"] The truth about the old concept of consoles is dead, I agree. But since most here talk as if it were still alive, we pretty much have to act likewise or every conversation will be fruitless.

Yeah, I see this discussion as fruitless, until we discuss a new taxonomy for what we consider to be the dead 'console' spirit. We need something new which embodies Wii, 360, and PS3. Is there a way to say "I'm the only one of these three platforms of which the game appears on"? Yeah sure, that is a totally legitimate concept. I just think 'console exclusive' doesn't work, because of the afforementioned reason. I'm not against the concept behind console exclusive, I'm just against console exclusive.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#241 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] If you guys want to be gungho about semantics, PCs are consoles.agentfred

That's not what Wikipedia tells me:

"The term "video game console" is used to distinguish amachinedesigned forconsumersto buy and use solely for playing video games from apersonal computer, which has many other functions, orarcade machines, which are designed for businesses that buy and then charge others to play."

And everyone knows that Wikipedia is always right. :P

Thats not what Oxford english Dictionary says; (also games console) a small machine for playing computerized video games
Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#242 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
[QUOTE="dsmccracken"] The truth about the old concept of consoles is dead, I agree. But since most here talk as if it were still alive, we pretty much have to act likewise or every conversation will be fruitless.Vandalvideo
Yeah, I see this discussion as fruitless, until we discuss a new taxonomy for what we consider to be the dead 'console' spirit. We need something new which embodies Wii, 360, and PS3. Is there a way to say "I'm the only one of these three platforms of which the game appears on"? Yeah sure, that is a totally legitimate concept. I just think 'console exclusive' doesn't work, because of the afforementioned reason. I'm not against the concept behind console exclusive, I'm just against console exclusive.

I've had this conversation before, and I'll say to you what I said then: I am not tied to "console exclusive." You could call it 360/PC only (and many do), you could call it restricted/limited exclusive, you could call it something as yet uninvented. Doesn't matter to me.
Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#243 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

So you're saying ignorance doesn't exist? Why does it matter if the demographic exists, when the fact is that it does. I know you can pick up either, I've already said that some gamers do this and make that descission.

Seperation exists, b/c the seperation is actually there (regradless of how the seperation was created).

-RPGamer-

No, im saying that we should not continue to be enablers of ignorance by further giving weight to a seperation that does not exist.

The distinction is mostly semantics.

I was partially tempted to take your post, nearly verbatim, and replace a few words with "racism" and your statement would look so absurd as to be racial pro-segregation. But that would neither be fair to you or entirely topical.

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#244 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="agentfred"]

If you guys want to be gungho about semantics, PCs are consoles.Vandalvideo
That's not what Wikipedia tells me:

"The term "video game console" is used to distinguish amachinedesigned forconsumersto buy and use solely for playing video games from apersonal computer, which has many other functions, orarcade machines, which are designed for businesses that buy and then charge others to play."

And everyone knows that Wikipedia is always right. :P

Thats not what Oxford english Dictionary says; (also games console) a small machine for playing computerized video games

We've talked about this before, and I'll say it again: you are correct, that is the Oxford entry, but I think that Oxford got it wrong here. I am no expert in linguistics so I'm sure my opinion will be meaningless to you on this subject, but it is pretty clear to me that whoever was assigned that relatively new entry didn't put in their due diligence. Probably some dilitant who was just passing time while dreaming of writing the next great novel.
Avatar image for agentfred
agentfred

5666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#245 agentfred
Member since 2003 • 5666 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] Thats not what Oxford english Dictionary says; (also games console) a small machine for playing computerized video games

Eh, well, I would suggest that this is a failure on the part of the definition writer, and writing the definition to generally, because in fact, the term exists for the sole purpose of making this distinction. I'm not sure I would take their word on this one.
Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#246 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
[QUOTE="XaosII"]

[QUOTE="-RPGamer-"]So you're saying ignorance doesn't exist? Why does it matter if the demographic exists, when the fact is that it does. I know you can pick up either, I've already said that some gamers do this and make that descission.

Seperation exists, b/c the seperation is actually there (regradless of how the seperation was created).

No, im saying that we should not continue to be enablers of ignorance by further giving weight to a seperation that does not exist.

The distinction is mostly semantics.

I was partially tempted to take your post, nearly verbatim, and replace a few words with "racism" and your statement would look so absurd as to be racial pro-segregation. But that would neither be fair to you or entirely topical.

If the separation doesn't exist, then who are all these people calling themselves consolites here, endlessly debating the merits of the 360 and PS3? The separation may not NEED to exist, but it does.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#247 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="agentfred"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] Thats not what Oxford english Dictionary says; (also games console) a small machine for playing computerized video games

Eh, well, I would suggest that this is a failure on the part of the definition writer, and writing the definition to generally, because in fact, the term exists for the sole purpose of making this distinction. I'm not sure I would take their word on this one.

Yeah, the term did exist for making that distinction, but with all of the recent advances that I laid out, that distinction's line is incredibly skewed. I mean, what console used to be is not anymore, and what console now is doesn't make that distinction. Is there a way to distinguish from 'consoles' and 'PCs'? Yeah, sure, but I'd like to hear it. You'd have to build the entire term around "no unification". Something like; aaaaah Unitas Exclusive or something.
Avatar image for scarymovie5
scarymovie5

1691

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#248 scarymovie5
Member since 2007 • 1691 Posts
Here are your responses Cows: PC is a system, this is system wars Lems: Pc shouldn't count in system wars Sheep: Why do people just ignore us all the time Hermits: We are a system and have the greatest library of games/exclusives Logical answers: You would have a point if this was console wars, sadly it's not.bdum_pshhh
This is great.
Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#249 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
[QUOTE="agentfred"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] Thats not what Oxford english Dictionary says; (also games console) a small machine for playing computerized video gamesVandalvideo
Eh, well, I would suggest that this is a failure on the part of the definition writer, and writing the definition to generally, because in fact, the term exists for the sole purpose of making this distinction. I'm not sure I would take their word on this one.

Yeah, the term did exist for making that distinction, but with all of the recent advances that I laid out, that distinction's line is incredibly skewed. I mean, what console used to be is not anymore, and what console now is doesn't make that distinction. Is there a way to distinguish from 'consoles' and 'PCs'? Yeah, sure, but I'd like to hear it. You'd have to build the entire term around "no unification". Something like; aaaaah Unitas Exclusive or something.

I think if the definition had been altered to respond to the new reality, this would be true. Things have blurred for the reasons you listed earlier between consoles and PCs. That being the case, an Oxford entry that showed no distinction would be pretty sensible. But one that could include cell phones? Or arcade games? Or my LED baseball game from 1982? I think that this is more a case of Oxford (or at least that particular writer) dropping the ball then some sort of dynamic and intelligent assessing of the new realities on Oxford's part.
Avatar image for Hanass
Hanass

2204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#250 Hanass
Member since 2008 • 2204 Posts

[QUOTE="Hanass"]

Except that only saying "exclusive" would arouse far too much supicion, so it's slightly more subtle to say "console exclusive".

opex07

suspicion from who, and of what? I'm not too sure what your trying to say.

From any rational person who is not a blind fanboy and who can accept that every system has a right to exist in a discussion in SW, no matter how afraid they are of getting owned.