[QUOTE="alfredooo"]
I actually agree 3 is too harsh. What IGN the reviewer did (while it might slightly help put Team Ninja in place) is a bit unprofessional. He shouldn't have only reviewed the game as an NG game but also as an action game, especially since lots of people who aren't NG fans will probably read his review.
But then again I also understand why the reviewer is pissed after one of the franchises he loved has gone to hell.
caryslan2
No, it should be judged by the standards of both its genre and the previous games in the series. Even by action game standards, its seems like this game falls short. No other weapons by default, toned down difficulty, bosses that get repeated constantly throughout and a general lack of polish.
And by NG standards, it tosses away things that have been in the series since NGI on the Xbox. Pointless changes that make no sense and don't enhance the game in anyway. From the looks of it, NGIII really brings nothing to the table and makes changes for the sake of "trying something new"
I'm not against changes in sequels, but I hate when they randomly toss away things that worked in previous entries. I'll play NG III to see how bad it really is, but the reviews are not reassuring.
That's actually what I'm saying :P "He shouldn't have only reviewed the game as an NG game but also as an action game" So yea, he should have done as both.
As for me, I have no plans on buying this, I will eventually pick it up since its NG and I simply have to try it for myself. I hope Team Ninja gets their stuff together by then (by that I mean they sell the right to NG to Valhalla or Platinum)
Log in to comment