1. NES
2. Atari 2600
3.PS2
4. SNES
5. Genesis
6. Xbox 360
7. PS1
8. Dreamcast
9. N64
10. Wii
What do you think, SW?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
1. NES
2. Atari 2600
3.PS2
4. SNES
5. Genesis
6. Xbox 360
7. PS1
8. Dreamcast
9. N64
10. Wii
What do you think, SW?
What people are going to say:
Sheep: Why is the Gamecube not on this list?
Cows: Why is the PS3 not on this list?
Lemmings: Why is the first Xbox not on this list?
Hermits: Why is the PC not on this list?
Er, even hermits wouldn't say pc, since you know...its a list of best consolesWhat people are going to say:
Sheep: Why is the Gamecube not on this list?
Cows: Why is the PS3 not on this list?
Lemmings: Why is the first Xbox not on this list?
Hermits: Why is the PC not on this list?
samanthademeste
i wouldnt put the 360 in the top ten. i think the 360's massive failure rate (by far the highest of any of the consoles on the list) should take it down quite a few notches. hardware reliability is an important factor.
true but the NES and PS1/PS2 weren't reliable either. You had to blow into NES cartridges to get them to work. (yes I remember having to do this) PS1/PS2 had quite high failure rates on the lasers. Of course RROD was in a league of its own but it has died down the last few years. it's the 2005-2008 consoles that are problematic.i wouldnt put the 360 in the top ten. i think the 360's massive failure rate (by far the highest of any of the consoles on the list) should take it down quite a few notches. hardware reliability is an important factor.
arbitor365
I think the SNES did more for gaming than the NES, but overall I agree with the list with some exceptions.
N64 shouldn't be on there, and Atari 2600 should be lower.
SNES, PS2, PS1, NES, 360/PS3, Atari 2600, Genesis, Dreamcast, Wii, something else would be the list I'd go with.
Depending on how much impact weighs in I can of course see the Atari 2600 where it is, but personally it is simply a little too archaic to be enjoyable in my opinion, thus it would probably not be on my list at all.
I actually prefer the PS1 at #1 owing to the unbelievable number of great new IP's it spawned that remain with us to this day.
The NES is a very important system with a lot of amazing games that remain amazing to this day, but it also has a lot of really bad games and not as many great games as some of the other systems on the list, so I'd drop it a few spots below the PS1, PS2, and SNES.
The 360 and PS3 have surpassed the Genesis for me and are inching on the SNES and NES.
I like the Sega Saturn (with its Japanese library included) better than the N64 or the Dreamcast.
I like the Gamecube and original X-Box better than the N64 or the Dreamcast.
So mine would be...
1. PS1
2. PS2
3. SNES
4. NES
5.X-Box 360 & PS3 (Tie)
6.Genesis
7.X-Box &Gamecube (Tie)
8.Saturn (Including JPN library *readies flame shield anyways*)
9.Wii *Scared flame shield can't stand the heat*
10.Dreamcast
If we were talking systems instead of consoles...
1. PC-Windows
2. PS1
3. PS2
4. Nintendo DS
5. GBA & SNES (Tie)
6. PC-Dos & PC-Amiga (Tie)
7.NES
8. X-Box 360 & PS3 (Tie)
9. Genesis
10. X-Box & Gamecube (Tie)
Eh even the best console of all time (imo) the PS2 had big hardware problems. It's not something to be ignored, but it's tought to discount so much awesome just for thati wouldnt put the 360 in the top ten. i think the 360's massive failure rate (by far the highest of any of the consoles on the list) should take it down quite a few notches. hardware reliability is an important factor.
arbitor365
360 on it and PS3 not even on it makes this list a fail. They are very comparable, and in reality a close match, suits just silly to not have them next to each other on a list like this.lx_theoDefinitely agree with this.
Worst console this gen is #5 and the best one isn't on the list. Lol. :lol: :?
Mozelleple112
the most important gaming publicationMozelleple112 on IGN
:lol:
[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]hmmm...i think you may be living in the wrong time period....genesis didnt come out this gen :| :lol: cows cant count I meant the best one this gen :PWorst console this gen is #5 and the best one isn't on the list. Lol. :lol: :?
mems_1224
[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]
Worst console this gen is #5 and the best one isn't on the list. Lol. :lol: :?
waltefmoney
the most important gaming publicationMozelleple112 on IGN
:lol:
And that list is making a major discussion, because it is coming from the biggest gaming publication (alongside GS), which is IGN. If this was Eurogamer or Edge or GameTrailers or videogame.pl I wouldn't care.It's a pretty solid list ... but I wouldn't include the N64 there. It had some amazing software but it constantly had droughts and was definitely one of the weaker Nintendo consoles ever.Haziqonfire
That's why I don't believe the 360 should be so high on that list ... It started off with a bang, but since late 08, early 09 it's line up has been pretty stagnant.
And that list is making a major discussion, because it is coming from the biggest gaming publication (alongside GS), which is IGN. If this was Eurogamer or Edge or GameTrailers or videogame.pl I wouldn't care.Mozelleple112
You have a point. The word's most important gaming publication thinks that the PS3 is the worst console this gen. How does that make you feel?
[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]And that list is making a major discussion, because it is coming from the biggest gaming publication (alongside GS), which is IGN. If this was Eurogamer or Edge or GameTrailers or videogame.pl I wouldn't care.waltefmoney
You have a point. The word's most important gaming publication thinks that the PS3 is the worst console this gen. How does that make you feel?
yet another reason to love ign. especially since they have two of the biggest PS fanboys in the world on their staff[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]And that list is making a major discussion, because it is coming from the biggest gaming publication (alongside GS), which is IGN. If this was Eurogamer or Edge or GameTrailers or videogame.pl I wouldn't care.waltefmoney
You have a point. The word's most important gaming publication thinks that the PS3 is the worst console this gen. How does that make you feel?
Well obviously that makes me upset, I do not know how I will be able to sleep tonight. Any suggestions how I can go by?Have you even played a 360? For the last 6 months you have never gave any 360 game any kudos what so ever. Heads up...........Sony does not care about you.Worst console this gen is #5 and the best one isn't on the list. Lol. :lol: :?
Mozelleple112
[QUOTE="waltefmoney"][QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]And that list is making a major discussion, because it is coming from the biggest gaming publication (alongside GS), which is IGN. If this was Eurogamer or Edge or GameTrailers or videogame.pl I wouldn't care.Mozelleple112
You have a point. The word's most important gaming publication thinks that the PS3 is the worst console this gen. How does that make you feel?
Well obviously that makes me upset, I do not know how I will be able to sleep tonight. Any suggestions how I can go by?drink away the pain. alcohol is your only hopeIt's not my personal list, but eh. That whole "they're entitled to their opinion" I guess.
Something along those lines
1. NES
2. Atari 2600
3.PS2
4. SNES
5. Genesis
6. Xbox 360
7. PS1
8. Dreamcast
9. N64
10. Wii
What do you think, SW?
samanthademeste
It's a pretty good list, though i think the 10th spot should have ben given to the PS3 instead of the Wii, and i like the fact that they gave the Genesis just a spot lower than the SNES (i vastly prefer the library on the Genesis than on the SNES anyway)
[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]Have you even played a 360? For the last 6 months you have never gave any 360 game any kudos what so ever. Heads up...........Sony does not care about you. Yes I have, Gears 3 is a great game. I wish it was on PC.Worst console this gen is #5 and the best one isn't on the list. Lol. :lol: :?
WarTornRuston
[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]It's a pretty solid list ... but I wouldn't include the N64 there. It had some amazing software but it constantly had droughts and was definitely one of the weaker Nintendo consoles ever.W1NGMAN-
That's why I don't believe the 360 should be so high on that list ... It started off with a bang, but since late 08, early 09 it's line up has been pretty stagnant.
It's only stagnant if you play your multiplats elsewhere. I've been getting them all on 360. Yeah it'd be nice to have more top exclusives as well, but come let's not pretend there aren't millions of 360 people delirious with joy at getting Dark Souls, Arkham City, Skyrim, etc etc![QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]Well obviously that makes me upset, I do not know how I will be able to sleep tonight. Any suggestions how I can go by?mems_1224drink away the pain. alcohol is your only hope
Yup.
[QUOTE="W1NGMAN-"][QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]It's a pretty solid list ... but I wouldn't include the N64 there. It had some amazing software but it constantly had droughts and was definitely one of the weaker Nintendo consoles ever.locopatho
That's why I don't believe the 360 should be so high on that list ... It started off with a bang, but since late 08, early 09 it's line up has been pretty stagnant.
It's only stagnant if you play your multiplats elsewhere. I've been getting them all on 360. Yeah it'd be nice to have more top exclusives as well, but come let's not pretend there aren't millions of 360 people delirious with joy at getting Dark Souls, Arkham City, Skyrim, etc etc!So how does it become more worthy of being on that list than the PS3? It has the multiplats as well as the exclusives ... I'm basically just trying to figure out IGN's reasoning but nothing really adds up.
[QUOTE="W1NGMAN-"][QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]It's a pretty solid list ... but I wouldn't include the N64 there. It had some amazing software but it constantly had droughts and was definitely one of the weaker Nintendo consoles ever.locopatho
That's why I don't believe the 360 should be so high on that list ... It started off with a bang, but since late 08, early 09 it's line up has been pretty stagnant.
It's only stagnant if you play your multiplats elsewhere. I've been getting them all on 360. Yeah it'd be nice to have more top exclusives as well, but come let's not pretend there aren't millions of 360 people delirious with joy at getting Dark Souls, Arkham City, Skyrim, etc etc!most people do buy multiplats on 360It's only stagnant if you play your multiplats elsewhere. I've been getting them all on 360. Yeah it'd be nice to have more top exclusives as well, but come let's not pretend there aren't millions of 360 people delirious with joy at getting Dark Souls, Arkham City, Skyrim, etc etc![QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="W1NGMAN-"]
That's why I don't believe the 360 should be so high on that list ... It started off with a bang, but since late 08, early 09 it's line up has been pretty stagnant.
W1NGMAN-
So how does it become more worthy of being on that list than the PS3? It has the multiplats as well as the exclusives ... I'm basically just trying to figure out IGN's reasoning but nothing really adds up.
yea it has exclusives now, it only took what? 5 years to get some almost decent games besides uncharted?It's only stagnant if you play your multiplats elsewhere. I've been getting them all on 360. Yeah it'd be nice to have more top exclusives as well, but come let's not pretend there aren't millions of 360 people delirious with joy at getting Dark Souls, Arkham City, Skyrim, etc etc![QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="W1NGMAN-"]
That's why I don't believe the 360 should be so high on that list ... It started off with a bang, but since late 08, early 09 it's line up has been pretty stagnant.
W1NGMAN-
So how does it become more worthy of being on that list than the PS3? It has the multiplats as well as the exclusives ... I'm basically just trying to figure out IGN's reasoning but nothing really adds up.
360 was released sooner, at a lower price point and features better online. Crucially 360 is a lot more popular than PS3 in North America. Where as Ps3 is more popular in Europe and huge in Japan.It's only stagnant if you play your multiplats elsewhere. I've been getting them all on 360. Yeah it'd be nice to have more top exclusives as well, but come let's not pretend there aren't millions of 360 people delirious with joy at getting Dark Souls, Arkham City, Skyrim, etc etc![QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="W1NGMAN-"]
That's why I don't believe the 360 should be so high on that list ... It started off with a bang, but since late 08, early 09 it's line up has been pretty stagnant.
W1NGMAN-
So how does it become more worthy of being on that list than the PS3? It has the multiplats as well as the exclusives ... I'm basically just trying to figure out IGN's reasoning but nothing really adds up.
O it;s not, PS3 should be just above or just below 360 since they the same more or less. PS3 has more exclusives, 360 gets PC games too. Pick your fave and stick the other just below. It's just that N64 droughts were ACTUAL droughts, not pretend SW droughts where the console was in reality actually getting AAA games on a consistant basis :PIt's only stagnant if you play your multiplats elsewhere. I've been getting them all on 360. Yeah it'd be nice to have more top exclusives as well, but come let's not pretend there aren't millions of 360 people delirious with joy at getting Dark Souls, Arkham City, Skyrim, etc etc![QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="W1NGMAN-"]
That's why I don't believe the 360 should be so high on that list ... It started off with a bang, but since late 08, early 09 it's line up has been pretty stagnant.
W1NGMAN-
So how does it become more worthy of being on that list than the PS3? It has the multiplats as well as the exclusives ... I'm basically just trying to figure out IGN's reasoning but nothing really adds up.
Throughout the entire generation 360 has been the best console. Only in the last 1 or 2 years people can argue otherwise. Xbox Live is probably a big factor.[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="W1NGMAN-"]It's only stagnant if you play your multiplats elsewhere. I've been getting them all on 360. Yeah it'd be nice to have more top exclusives as well, but come let's not pretend there aren't millions of 360 people delirious with joy at getting Dark Souls, Arkham City, Skyrim, etc etc!most people do buy multiplats on 360That's why I don't believe the 360 should be so high on that list ... It started off with a bang, but since late 08, early 09 it's line up has been pretty stagnant.
mems_1224
Considering there's what 10 million more 360s out there than the PS3 in the US that shouldn't come off as a surpise to anyone.Now do 360/PS3 owners choose 360 as their primary console more often? We'll never know, it's one of those impossible questions to answer.
[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]Lol, crappy list.locopathoTell me yours! O and I'm eating a meatball sub right now. Coincidence!? I think not Well the consoles are good, I just don't agree on the numbering. SNES is #1 for me #4 is too far. Put in Gamecube, remove Dreamcast (not sure about Atari either).
most people do buy multiplats on 360[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="locopatho"] It's only stagnant if you play your multiplats elsewhere. I've been getting them all on 360. Yeah it'd be nice to have more top exclusives as well, but come let's not pretend there aren't millions of 360 people delirious with joy at getting Dark Souls, Arkham City, Skyrim, etc etc!W1NGMAN-
Considering there's what 10 million more 360s out there than the PS3 in the US that shouldn't come off as a surpise to anyone.Now do 360/PS3 owners choose 360 as their primary console more often? We'll never know, it's one of those impossible questions to answer.
i sure do and so do most people i know that game. but thats just a small number of people so who knows[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]Lol, crappy list.SaltyMeatballsTell me yours! O and I'm eating a meatball sub right now. Coincidence!? I think not Well the consoles are good, I just don't agree on the numbering. SNES is #1 for me #4 is too far. Put in Gamecube, remove Dreamcast (not sure about Atari either). i was with you until you said remove the deamcast and put the gamecube in :P
[QUOTE="W1NGMAN-"][QUOTE="locopatho"] It's only stagnant if you play your multiplats elsewhere. I've been getting them all on 360. Yeah it'd be nice to have more top exclusives as well, but come let's not pretend there aren't millions of 360 people delirious with joy at getting Dark Souls, Arkham City, Skyrim, etc etc!SaltyMeatballs
So how does it become more worthy of being on that list than the PS3? It has the multiplats as well as the exclusives ... I'm basically just trying to figure out IGN's reasoning but nothing really adds up.
Throughout the entire generation 360 has been the best console. Only in the last 1 or 2 years people can argue otherwise. Xbox Live is probably a big factor.How can you say "Throughout the entire generation 360 has been the best console" than turn around and say "in the last 1 or 2 years people can argue otherwise" ... Let's be serious, it's not arguable that the 360 has been getting out performed the last two years, and next year looks no different.
If Live is a big factor, than what exactly is it doing that puts it so far ahead of PSN that it makes it not only a "All-time console" list but placed as high as 6th?
Lol, what? people saying N64 doesn't belong there?
Maybe the best game ever made :OOT (10) and sequel majora's mask (8.3)
Two of the best FPS's ever: perfect dark (9.9) and goldeneye (9.8)
The best platformers ever: super mario 64 (9.4), banjo kazooie (9.5) en tooie (9.6), conkur (9.3)
Yeah N64 was incredible for about the first dozen games. If that's all you need in a generation then it was the best. But if you want more then that, and some gosh darned RPGs! Then it kinda sucked for long stretches.Lol, what? people saying N64 doesn't belong there?
Maybe the best game ever made :OOT (10) and sequel majora's mask (8.3)
Two of the best FPS's ever: perfect dark (9.9) and goldeneye (9.8)
The best platformers ever: super mario 64 (9.4), banjo kazooie (9.5) en tooie (9.6), conkur (9.3)
vlens
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment