Joke thread?rimnet00
must be
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I never played KZ.
KZ:Liberation is a great game.
As for KZ2 it could be great...BUT..I think the biggest problem KZ has is too deply rooted to fix. The entire concept is just really...bland...and dull. Does anyone feel attached to the helghast or this war? It doesn't have a specific visual style that makes it stand out and none of the characters are all that appealing. These aspects are the very core of the game and they are already deeply flawed. KZ should be dropped. Resistance is the PS3 FPS. Go back to formula on KZ.
KZ: Liberation was fun but I'm still not a big fan of the KZ universe. So KZ2 better be fun as heck cause thats the only distraction from the dull presentation and storyline.
[QUOTE="Adrian_Cloud"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Adrian_Cloud"]HL2 fpsGOTY> Halo 2. Which one had the higher score?
Thus proving my point, especially here on GS a game doesn't have to score the higher to be a better game. Despite, your "logic". DivergeUnify
Wait, so now you're grouping together Half-Life 2 and Killzone 2 as in the same league. Dear god....
I don't get it, so your logic is wrong and now your trying to rip on me for using a credible example. I haven't played KZ2, but i have played Halo 3, and it safe to say the way KZ2 is shaping up will be a much better game.
KZ2 looks way more generic than Halo3 to be honset. Its cover system is a joke and is just a gimmick rip off of leaning.Also now that scores are not technically awarded, a game given a higher score is most likely going to be better since its the overall vibe of the game
And sorry, but comparing PC to console isn't the same as comparing console games to console games ;)
:| I'm confused, beccause HL2 is now on consoles, and it certainly a better version that what was released 3 years ago.
HL2(2004)>HL2: Orange box? I think not.
Another thing Halo 3, definately not generic at all... the flood battles were great, the weapons are unique to the halo universe, lacks any sort of gimmicks (yah, Forge is actually a good addition), and has a decent story, great controls, great over-all music. Those are the reasons its not generic.
Could you care to explain how KZ2 looks more generic, i mean Halo 3 doesn't even have a cover system, resorts to back-tracking to make the game more lengthy, the troop a.i drives around in circles in vehicles, the difficulty is insanely easy, the length is short, the physics( are they even present?), lacks variety in enemies, some of the weapons are completly useless, enemy a.i is a joke most of the time, the graphics varry from great to fairly poor(jaggies everywhere, poor cutscenes), there is probably no stand out point in the whole of SP experience(scorpions too easy). MP is the same as halo 2.
What makes KZ2's gameplay stand out? HL2: OB isn't just HL2 so thats a terrible comparison.:| I'm confused, beccause HL2 is now on consoles, and it certainly a better version that what was released 3 years ago.
Adrian_Cloud
HL2(2004)>HL2: Orange box? I think not.
Another thing Halo 3, definately not generic at all... the flood battles were great, the weapons are unique to the halo universe, lacks any sort of gimmicks (yah, Forge is actually a good addition), and has a decent story, great controls, great over-all music. Those are the reasons its not generic.
Could you care to explain how KZ2 looks more generic, i mean Halo 3 doesn't even have a cover system, resorts to back-tracking to make the game more lengthy, the troop a.i drives around in circles in vehicles, the difficulty is insanely easy, the length is short, the physics( are they even present?), lacks variety in enemies, some of the weapons are completly useless, enemy a.i is a joke most of the time, the graphics varry from great to fairly poor(jaggies everywhere, poor cutscenes), there is probably no stand out point in the whole of SP experience(scorpions too easy). MP is the same as halo 2.
[QUOTE="Adrian_Cloud"][QUOTE="DivergeUnify"][QUOTE="Adrian_Cloud"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Adrian_Cloud"]HL2 fpsGOTY> Halo 2. Which one had the higher score?
Thus proving my point, especially here on GS a game doesn't have to score the higher to be a better game. Despite, your "logic". DivergeUnify
Wait, so now you're grouping together Half-Life 2 and Killzone 2 as in the same league. Dear god....
I don't get it, so your logic is wrong and now your trying to rip on me for using a credible example. I haven't played KZ2, but i have played Halo 3, and it safe to say the way KZ2 is shaping up will be a much better game.
KZ2 looks way more generic than Halo3 to be honset. Its cover system is a joke and is just a gimmick rip off of leaning.Also now that scores are not technically awarded, a game given a higher score is most likely going to be better since its the overall vibe of the game
And sorry, but comparing PC to console isn't the same as comparing console games to console games ;)
:| I'm confused, beccause HL2 is now on consoles, and it certainly a better version that what was released 3 years ago.
HL2(2004)>HL2: Orange box? I think not.
Another thing Halo 3, definately not generic at all... the flood battles were great, the weapons are unique to the halo universe, lacks any sort of gimmicks (yah, Forge is actually a good addition), and has a decent story, great controls, great over-all music. Those are the reasons its not generic.
Could you care to explain how KZ2 looks more generic, i mean Halo 3 doesn't even have a cover system, resorts to back-tracking to make the game more lengthy, the troop a.i drives around in circles in vehicles, the difficulty is insanely easy, the length is short, the physics( are they even present?), lacks variety in enemies, some of the weapons are completly useless, enemy a.i is a joke most of the time, the graphics varry from great to fairly poor(jaggies everywhere, poor cutscenes), there is probably no stand out point in the whole of SP experience(scorpions too easy). MP is the same as halo 2.
Sounds good, I realized the game seemed to have a better sense of a battle, whereas H3 had just small scrims( for the most part). The levels looked really linear, though and the cover system still(imo) looks like a gimmicky lean system.Adrian_Cloud
Not really..just comparing console fps to pc ones. The fact that i chose the same titles, was purely at random.
Killzone 2 has stand out gameplay because, of the challenge, its not like halo 3 its more of WWII game where the sense of warfare is everywhere, stray bullets do damage. Enemies are smart and are tryig to flank you, a head on attack may lead to a certain death(unlike in halo 3, BR,Shotgun or plasma rifle,energy sword= enmies owned). Cover system is actually quite effective, and keeps the game fast paced, so your not just running behing an object and not standing there. Its the little things that are put togethor that will make the gameplay stand out. The game also has great physics and controls according to GI.
[QUOTE="maabus99"]Have you seen Crysis on the new settings modders just found? I hope this is a joke thread if you have.SergeantSnitch
No I haven't. Matter of fact, I don't even know what you're talking about. I'm talking consoles here buddy, Crysis doesn't count.
Quote your topic title "Killzone 2 will revolutionize the FPS genre for years to come". Crysis is in the FPS genre. Crysis is more revolutionary than Killzone will ever be. Also what is up with you making topics and saying good read today. This is the second topic i've seen from you. Its all your personal opinion. You link to no source at all and go on blabbering about how the ps3 is the best and how killzone is the awesome. I hope killzone does good but at the same time i hope it FLOPS SO F**** BADLY JUST TO SHUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU UP.
[QUOTE="3picuri3"][QUOTE="SergeantSnitch"][QUOTE="3picuri3"][QUOTE="Zeliard9"]Killzone 2's lighting is not better than Crysis'.
Rockman999
it doesn't come close to what Crysis uses - anyone in the know knows :)
hahahahahahaha.
oh my, i predict you will be in some sigs pup :)
either this is a joke thread or you just said one of the most foolish things i've ever read in here.
thinking the PS3 can do what Crysis does is like thinking a midget can take a bigger dump than andre the giant. PS3 does not have the hardware to come close to Crysis.
well youd be surprised at how much a "little" person can hold in.Ive even seen a chihuahua take a bigger dump than a Rottweiler.i'm guessing you haven't seen any Andre the Giant logs floating about :P
[QUOTE="Rikusaki"][QUOTE="saolin323"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Resistance 2 will be better than Killzone 2.
3picuri3
You are 1000% right in that, that is what i strongly believe too, Resistance was great, it just need a lot more of those amazing monster appearances, hopefully in Resistance 2 all huge monsters are out free :), not THAT would revolutionize FPS genre :)
I think both games will be really good. Crysis will be good, KZ2 will be good and Resistance: Rise of Man (resistance 2) will be good.
i dunno about resistance 2, i honestly couldn't bring myself to finish it, found it sooo boring. but i've had a long history of playing shooters on the PC so that's probably why. the glass breaking physics were top notch though :) but something is wrong with a game when you have more fun breaking glass then playing.
yeah story mode is ok, but the online multiplayer is amazing and fun. up to 40 players and the maps are huge.
[QUOTE="3picuri3"][QUOTE="Rikusaki"][QUOTE="saolin323"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Resistance 2 will be better than Killzone 2.
Rikusaki
You are 1000% right in that, that is what i strongly believe too, Resistance was great, it just need a lot more of those amazing monster appearances, hopefully in Resistance 2 all huge monsters are out free :), not THAT would revolutionize FPS genre :)
I think both games will be really good. Crysis will be good, KZ2 will be good and Resistance: Rise of Man (resistance 2) will be good.
i dunno about resistance 2, i honestly couldn't bring myself to finish it, found it sooo boring. but i've had a long history of playing shooters on the PC so that's probably why. the glass breaking physics were top notch though :) but something is wrong with a game when you have more fun breaking glass then playing.
yeah story mode is ok, but the online multiplayer is amazing and fun. up to 40 players and the maps are huge.
it was fun for a while for me, but i got tired of the random spawns that would have you right in front of someone else who just spawned in deathmatch.. i heard they fixed some of that though.
It won't revolutionize the FPS genre and people need to understand that Killzone is not the answer to the Halo series, nor is it the Halo Killer.
It's just a FPS on the PS3 and I have faith that the game will be good just like Killzone: Liberation. We don't have to have a(an) "Insert popular title here" Killer everytime.
Did you cut and paste some of that from some marketing blurb from Sony. lol it sounds like complte marketing driod BS. Oh yeah. and the textures in that pic...ouch. I mean really ouch.hywel69
[QUOTE="hywel69"]Did you cut and paste some of that from some marketing blurb from Sony. lol it sounds like complte marketing driod BS. Oh yeah. and the textures in that pic...ouch. I mean really ouch.SergeantSnitch
well that gives me some terrific insight as to why Sony is failing so badly with the PS3 :P
COD4 looks as good or better than kz2CrimsonBlade360
I remember when Killzone 1 was a Halo Killer. It did no such thing. It was a bugged sloppy slow mess. And, now, the same folks will deliver? OK. Let me know when. Demetri_OS
Just wait man.SergeantSnitchOh yeah, I will. When the the PS3 is $300, im in. I go were the games are, not the hype & future "promises". Thanks!
I just watched the gameplay again to relive the glorious day of the unveling ........ and I have to say I really liked the atmosphere , graphics , style , lighting , effects , destructible environments , cover mechanics , animations ....... and above all else it looked really fun to shoot the Helghast soldiers.
I have no idea about the game's modes , length , variety , multiplayer , etc .......... but I am definitely excited about what I have seen so far. I don't really care if it revolutionizes anything.
[QUOTE="SergeantSnitch"] Just wait man.Demetri_OSOh yeah, I will. When the the PS3 is $300, im in. I go were the games are, not the hype & future "promises". Thanks!
i love that you have the line 'lemmings are delusional' in your sig, it makes this thread all the more hilarious.
crysis destroys the muddines that is KZ2. and KZ lighting system is nowhere near as complex as Crysis, sorry.. at least not based on what i've seen.
3picuri3
KZ2 lighting stomps Crysis I dont see the lighting off the Crysis suites casting light on objects. KZ2 has the most detailed lighting of any game period. And if you think Crysis killz KZ2 do some urbran shots of Crysis and compare them to KZ2 Crysis really isnt that far ahead of it in that category.Yes it has beautiful jungles but we saw one level of KZ2 its foolish to think the whole game is going to be that dark.
COD4 looks as good or better than kz2CrimsonBlade360
Honestly no it doesnt and Cod 4 is done adn releaed KZ2 isnt even in Pre_alpha.
[QUOTE="SergeantSnitch"][QUOTE="3picuri3"][QUOTE="Zeliard9"]Killzone 2's lighting is not better than Crysis'.
3picuri3
it doesn't come close to what Crysis uses - anyone in the know knows :)
hahahahahahaha.
oh my, i predict you will be in some sigs pup :)
either this is a joke thread or you just said one of the most foolish things i've ever read in here.
thinking the PS3 can do what Crysis does is like thinking a midget can take a bigger dump than andre the giant. PS3 does not have the hardware to come close to Crysis.
You need to do a little more research before you continue to make a fool of yourself. The PS3 has the hardware to do the visual effetcts of Crsyis. Even Cevat said the Processing power was enough the only problem is RAM. The amount of detail in Crysis is easiliy possible onPS3 but to put it on that scale is what the problem is. In other words you will see games that look better on consoles just at a smaller scale.
tc, can you say anything that isn't opinion, speculation, or made up?
that's the reason this thread fails. you haven't said one reason why this game is revolutionary. yea it has good graphics, lighting, and physics but that is far from new. the only thing you keep saying is about the immersion which you have no clue about since you haven't played it. even if it does really immerse the player that still isn't revolutionary.
better than cod4? i think not. (obviously my opinion. that's another reason why your thread fails. you're trying to pass off your opinion as fact.)
[QUOTE="ithilgore2006"]Stop claiming every thread you make is a "good read". That's not for you to decide.Rikusaki
i think its a good read too
and i and the majority of others would say it isn't.
[QUOTE="Rikusaki"][QUOTE="ithilgore2006"]Stop claiming every thread you make is a "good read". That's not for you to decide.ItalStallion777
i think its a good read too
and i and the majority of others would say it isn't.
wasnt a bad read. it was funny.
and i and the majority of others would say it isn't.ItalStallion777
I didn't realize System Wars operated oficially under a majority mind set...
On that note: People should make threads with "KILLZONE 2" in the title more often so as to demonstrate the desperation and venom of Microsoft consumers with how quick they flood the threads with insults, one-liners, and "can't compare to Crysis" comments.
joke thread? lol its all about graphics...do u remember lair? ...it doesn't look that amazing anyways, its nice but its not revoltionary lol...Titus_WoWplayer
I hope this doesn't trigger another KZ2 hypegazim. The weeks leading up to the Halo 3 launch were bad enough.
But anyways tricked out lighting engine =/= revolutionary. The game will look great yes, I'm not arguing that.But why do you insist on blowing that simple fact way out of proportion?
[QUOTE="Titus_WoWplayer"]joke thread? lol its all about graphics...do u remember lair? ...it doesn't look that amazing anyways, its nice but its not revoltionary lol...SergeantSnitch
[QUOTE="ItalStallion777"]and i and the majority of others would say it isn't.Pariah_001
I didn't realize System Wars operated oficially under a majority mind set...
On that note: People should make threads with "KILLZONE 2" in the title more often so as to demonstrate the desperation and venom of Microsoft consumers with how quick they flood the threads with insults, one-liners, and "can't compare to Crysis" comments.
On your note: Please don't subject the casual readers to that.
[QUOTE="SergeantSnitch"][QUOTE="Titus_WoWplayer"]joke thread? lol its all about graphics...do u remember lair? ...it doesn't look that amazing anyways, its nice but its not revoltionary lol...neogeo419
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment