Yep. Laughter from idiotic fanboy comments like yours can indeed make people tear up.[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="NathanDrakeSwag"]
ITT: Hermit tears
lostrib
the amount of stupid makes you want to cry?
That, too.This topic is locked from further discussion.
embarrassing thread just like the ones you make a beyond3D that's why everyone laughs at you :lol:Tessellationthey said killzone 4 shadows fall demo used 3gb for video ram. ok 7gb supposibly usable. ONLY 4GB left for cpu ram. ahahah i can buy a 4gb video card now lol.
8 core cpu running at 1.6...only like 5-6 cores usable and weaker than 2004 winchester. Not to mention i can clock my athlon64 up to 2.8 ghz. Not to mention i can use two graphics cards twice as powerful as ps4 or xbone's. yea 10 year old pc still stomps ps4/xbones ass oldgamesbetter
Troll account?
Jaguar's IPC stomps all over Wincester's IPC and has more/better instruction sets to use. You'd bottleneck the heck out of any modern GPU you tried to pair up with an AMD64.
[QUOTE="oldgamesbetter"]8 core cpu running at 1.6...only like 5-6 cores usable and weaker than 2004 winchester. Not to mention i can clock my athlon64 up to 2.8 ghz. Not to mention i can use two graphics cards twice as powerful as ps4 or xbone's. yea 10 year old pc still stomps ps4/xbones ass Aidenfury19
Troll account?
Jaguar's IPC stomps all over Wincester's IPC and has more/better instruction sets to use. You'd bottleneck the heck out of any modern GPU you tried to pair up with an AMD64.
running at lower clock and confirmed does less operations per clock cycle.[QUOTE="oldgamesbetter"]8 core cpu running at 1.6...only like 5-6 cores usable and weaker than 2004 winchester. Not to mention i can clock my athlon64 up to 2.8 ghz. Not to mention i can use two graphics cards twice as powerful as ps4 or xbone's. yea 10 year old pc still stomps ps4/xbones ass Aidenfury19
Troll account?
Jaguar's IPC stomps all over Wincester's IPC and has more/better instruction sets to use. You'd bottleneck the heck out of any modern GPU you tried to pair up with an AMD64.
bottlenecking is exaggerated bullshit.Lol what? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813186059 This motherboard holds 4gb ram max and can run two titan graphics cards if i wanted.[QUOTE="oldgamesbetter"]run two 4gb 670 gtx's in here sli mode. 4gb cpu ram....8gb video ram.mitu123
[QUOTE="mitu123"]Lol what? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813186059 This motherboard holds 4gb ram max and can run two titan graphics cards if i wanted.Ok, I see what you mean now.[QUOTE="oldgamesbetter"]run two 4gb 670 gtx's in here sli mode. 4gb cpu ram....8gb video ram.oldgamesbetter
[QUOTE="Aidenfury19"][QUOTE="oldgamesbetter"]8 core cpu running at 1.6...only like 5-6 cores usable and weaker than 2004 winchester. Not to mention i can clock my athlon64 up to 2.8 ghz. Not to mention i can use two graphics cards twice as powerful as ps4 or xbone's. yea 10 year old pc still stomps ps4/xbones ass oldgamesbetter
Troll account?
Jaguar's IPC stomps all over Wincester's IPC and has more/better instruction sets to use. You'd bottleneck the heck out of any modern GPU you tried to pair up with an AMD64.
running at lower clock and confirmed does less operations per clock cycle.Jaguar IPC is a bit less than Llano/Stars which itself was a 6-8% improvement over Phenom II. Winchester was a K8 part which had considerably worse IPC than even Phenom, much less Phenom II.
running at lower clock and confirmed does less operations per clock cycle.[QUOTE="oldgamesbetter"][QUOTE="Aidenfury19"]
Troll account?
Jaguar's IPC stomps all over Wincester's IPC and has more/better instruction sets to use. You'd bottleneck the heck out of any modern GPU you tried to pair up with an AMD64.
Aidenfury19
Jaguar IPC is a bit less than Llano/Stars which itself was a 6-8% improvement over Phenom II. Winchester was a K8 part which had considerably worse IPC than even Phenom, much less Phenom II.
anandtech already confirmed k8 is more powerful than the jaguar.[QUOTE="Aidenfury19"][QUOTE="oldgamesbetter"] running at lower clock and confirmed does less operations per clock cycle.oldgamesbetter
Jaguar IPC is a bit less than Llano/Stars which itself was a 6-8% improvement over Phenom II. Winchester was a K8 part which had considerably worse IPC than even Phenom, much less Phenom II.
anandtech already confirmed k8 is more powerful than the jaguar.Prove it.
So there you have it, folks - the makers of the best-looking PC game praise PS4 but spit on WiiU.
Where are "sheep" now? :P
anandtech already confirmed k8 is more powerful than the jaguar.[QUOTE="oldgamesbetter"][QUOTE="Aidenfury19"]
Jaguar IPC is a bit less than Llano/Stars which itself was a 6-8% improvement over Phenom II. Winchester was a K8 part which had considerably worse IPC than even Phenom, much less Phenom II.
Aidenfury19
Prove it.
its on their site i didnt favorite the article just look up ps4 in their search or something or click their cpu tab.[QUOTE="Aidenfury19"][QUOTE="oldgamesbetter"] anandtech already confirmed k8 is more powerful than the jaguar.oldgamesbetter
Prove it.
its on their site i didnt favorite the article just look up ps4 in their search or something or click their cpu tab.No, you're the one here claiming it's better, if you want anybody to believe you link the fricking article.
So there you have it, folks - the makers of the best-looking PC game praise PS4 but spit on WiiU.
Where are "sheep" now? :P
nameless12345
Â
That happens before every gen and then it turns out to be BS.
http://anandtech.com/show/6976/amds-jaguar-architecture-the-cpu-powering-xbox-one-playstation-4-kabini-temash Weaker than k8 :)oldgamesbetter
Stop lying, there is NO mention of K8 in that article. I don't even need to read the thing again as I've done so previously.
anandtech already confirmed k8 is more powerful than the jaguar.[QUOTE="oldgamesbetter"][QUOTE="Aidenfury19"]
Jaguar IPC is a bit less than Llano/Stars which itself was a 6-8% improvement over Phenom II. Winchester was a K8 part which had considerably worse IPC than even Phenom, much less Phenom II.
Aidenfury19
Prove it.
Jaguar is only suppose to be 15% faster on average vs bobcat clock per clock.
soon to be 10 year old cpu in that motherboard that holds 4gb ram max ddr1 and can run two geforce titans lololdgamesbetter
are you high?
[QUOTE="oldgamesbetter"]soon to be 10 year old cpu in that motherboard that holds 4gb ram max ddr1 and can run two geforce titans lolMK-Professor
are you high?
You dont think i can put two geforce titans into this sli motherboard? Are you high?[QUOTE="MK-Professor"][QUOTE="oldgamesbetter"]soon to be 10 year old cpu in that motherboard that holds 4gb ram max ddr1 and can run two geforce titans lololdgamesbetter
are you high?
You dont think i can put two geforce titans into this sli motherboard? Are you high?nobody cares
[QUOTE="MK-Professor"][QUOTE="oldgamesbetter"]soon to be 10 year old cpu in that motherboard that holds 4gb ram max ddr1 and can run two geforce titans lololdgamesbetter
are you high?
You dont think i can put two geforce titans into this sli motherboard? Are you high?because you will get 10% of the titans performance like that :?
[QUOTE="Aidenfury19"]
[QUOTE="oldgamesbetter"] anandtech already confirmed k8 is more powerful than the jaguar.04dcarraher
Prove it.
Jaguar is only suppose to be 15% faster on average vs bobcat clock per clock.
That chart shows that K8 trails Bobcat in integer performance, the integer performance is where the 15-20% IPC improvement comes into play. The FPU performance improvement for Jaguar is much higher than 15%.
You dont think i can put two geforce titans into this sli motherboard? Are you high?[QUOTE="oldgamesbetter"][QUOTE="MK-Professor"]
are you high?
MK-Professor
because you will get 10% of the titans performance like that :?
Yea man 10% of the performance at 2600x1600 with x16 AA with 100% gpu workload BSEven if the jaguar does slightly more instructions per clock running at same clock speed as k8. my k8's default clock is 2.0 ghz so that makes up for it and i can clock alot higher than that to more than make up for it. ps4 and xbone only 1.6 ghz LOLoldgamesbetter
Again, you're ignoring improved instruction sets which improve performance dramatically and the fact that Jaguar has more cores available to use. You have to be a troll account, but in any case if you can't start providing proof for some of your claims you'll start to be reported for trolling.
[QUOTE="MK-Professor"][QUOTE="oldgamesbetter"] You dont think i can put two geforce titans into this sli motherboard? Are you high?oldgamesbetter
because you will get 10% of the titans performance like that :?
Yea man 10% of the performance at 2600x1600 with x16 AA with 100% gpu workload BS100% gpu usage at 7680×4320 ...
[QUOTE="oldgamesbetter"]Even if the jaguar does slightly more instructions per clock running at same clock speed as k8. my k8's default clock is 2.0 ghz so that makes up for it and i can clock alot higher than that to more than make up for it. ps4 and xbone only 1.6 ghz LOLAidenfury19
Again, you're ignoring improved instruction sets which improve performance dramatically and the fact that Jaguar has more cores available to use. You have to be a troll account, but in any case if you can't start providing proof for some of your claims you'll start to be reported for trolling.
Im just saying what anandtech.com said the bobcat=the jaguar and it's weaker than the k8.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment