Nvidia GTX 780 outperforms Titan * Next-gen Consoles are so DEAD

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#251 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="Jonwh18"] It's from 2011 I believe? Idk I got it exactly a week before lion came out. 

Jonwh18

Same as me then. Keep a eye on it, it shouldn't do it again. If it does, it could be a sign of the actual card being physically damaged.

Internetz said it was because I switched to a new network, which I did. But my problem with that theory is that it didn't happen until the thrid or 4rth day of being on that new home network. 

Maybe its just Lion shitting itself. Lion's network performance is patchy at times.
Avatar image for kipsta77
kipsta77

1119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#252 kipsta77
Member since 2012 • 1119 Posts

Were are you getting these results?! The TITAN outperforms the 780!

Avatar image for Jonwh18
Jonwh18

9350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#253 Jonwh18
Member since 2009 • 9350 Posts

[QUOTE="Jonwh18"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"] Same as me then. Keep a eye on it, it shouldn't do it again. If it does, it could be a sign of the actual card being physically damaged. clyde46

Internetz said it was because I switched to a new network, which I did. But my problem with that theory is that it didn't happen until the thrid or 4rth day of being on that new home network. 

Maybe its just Lion shitting itself. Lion's network performance is patchy at times.

I'm still on OSX snowleopard atm. Upgrading to mountain lion this weekend when I have the time. 

Avatar image for jhonMalcovich
jhonMalcovich

7090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#254 jhonMalcovich
Member since 2010 • 7090 Posts

Were are you getting these results?! The TITAN outperforms the 780!

kipsta77

Move to the page 8 and start reading from there.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#255 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
okay, i would rather have great gameplay and great graphicslostrib
Apparently PC developers can't hit that mark,once again look at Gamerankings highest rated games you will be surprise.
Avatar image for jhonMalcovich
jhonMalcovich

7090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#256 jhonMalcovich
Member since 2010 • 7090 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]okay, i would rather have great gameplay and great graphicstormentos
Apparently PC developers can't hit that mark,once again look at Gamerankings highest rated games you will be surprise.

Lol. According to those ratings we should get back to 90s games.

According to Gamerankings, Super Mario Galaxy is the best game of all time. Probably we all should by Wii :lol:

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#257 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]okay, i would rather have great gameplay and great graphicstormentos
Apparently PC developers can't hit that mark,once again look at Gamerankings highest rated games you will be surprise.

It's bunch of multiplats, which look better on PC. Thus, great gameplay, great graphics

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#258 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="lostrib"]Uh huh, where is the PS4 in there?lostrib

In between the 2....

so the 7950 is what 20% faster? more so at higher resolutions.  And your placement of the PS4 is based simpy on the TFLOPs of the GPU

Which is minimal unless you consider 20% to be a world.. In fact take BF3 for example at 2560X1600 Ultra quality the 7950 does 44FPS,the 7870 does 41 FPS so we are talking here about miserable 3 frames per second,the 7850 pull 32 FPS 12 FPS less than the 7950.so yeah hardly a killer blow or anything huge.. It can vary from game to game,but on a console power abode 30 FPS is use for visuals,so while PS4 can be slower at 1080p than the 7950,the extra power over 30 FPS will be use or visuals which should keep the PS4 even closer,remember consoles hardly target higher than 30FPS.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#259 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
It's bunch of multiplats, which look better on PC. Thus, great gameplay, great graphicslostrib
Multiplatform don't count since we are comparing different hardware and those are the same games. In fact the highest rated game Mario Galaxy,which is done on hardware basically from 2001..
Avatar image for jhonMalcovich
jhonMalcovich

7090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#260 jhonMalcovich
Member since 2010 • 7090 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"] In between the 2....tormentos

so the 7950 is what 20% faster? more so at higher resolutions.  And your placement of the PS4 is based simpy on the TFLOPs of the GPU

Which is minimal unless you consider 20% to be a world.. In fact take BF3 for example at 2560X1600 Ultra quality the 7950 does 44FPS,the 7870 does 41 FPS so we are talking here about miserable 3 frames per second,the 7850 pull 32 FPS 12 FPS less than the 7950.so yeah hardly a killer blow or anything huge.. It can vary from game to game,but on a console power abode 30 FPS is use for visuals,so while PS4 can be slower at 1080p than the 7950,the extra power over 30 FPS will be use or visuals which should keep the PS4 even closer,remember consoles hardly target higher than 30FPS.

Do you realize that PS4 just doesn´t have many games confirmed ? That at launch it will have probably 9 games, only 2 of them exclusives ? That it will have to sell at least 10M units to be considered viable for exclusives, otherwise WiiU scenario will be repeated?

PC is the safest bet next gen.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#261 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]It's bunch of multiplats, which look better on PC. Thus, great gameplay, great graphicstormentos
Multiplatform don't count since we are comparing different hardware and those are the same games. In fact the highest rated game Mario Galaxy,which is done on hardware basically from 2001..

why doesn't multiplatform count? can i not play them on my PC?

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#262 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"] In between the 2....tormentos

so the 7950 is what 20% faster? more so at higher resolutions.  And your placement of the PS4 is based simpy on the TFLOPs of the GPU

Which is minimal unless you consider 20% to be a world.. In fact take BF3 for example at 2560X1600 Ultra quality the 7950 does 44FPS,the 7870 does 41 FPS so we are talking here about miserable 3 frames per second,the 7850 pull 32 FPS 12 FPS less than the 7950.so yeah hardly a killer blow or anything huge.. It can vary from game to game,but on a console power abode 30 FPS is use for visuals,so while PS4 can be slower at 1080p than the 7950,the extra power over 30 FPS will be use or visuals which should keep the PS4 even closer,remember consoles hardly target higher than 30FPS.

12 FPS is a rather large amount. and those numbers are without AA. at 4x AA the 7850 is below 30fps and 7870 is barely above 30, with the 7950 around 40

Avatar image for kipsta77
kipsta77

1119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#263 kipsta77
Member since 2012 • 1119 Posts

[QUOTE="kipsta77"]

Were are you getting these results?! The TITAN outperforms the 780!

jhonMalcovich

Move to the page 8 and start reading from there.

All of the other games and tests, the Titan comes out on top (naturally).

Anyways... Consoles?! pfffft. ahahaha

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#264 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
Do you realize that PS4 just doesn´t have many games confirmed ? That at launch it will have probably 9 games, only 2 of them exclusives ? That it will have to sell at least 10M units to be considered viable for exclusives, otherwise WiiU scenario will be repeated?

PC is the safest bet next gen.

jhonMalcovich
Dude i will quote your sig i don't spec less than 16 games on PS4 launch,to say the PS4 will have 9 games is a downright joke. The wii U is different and 3rd parties has never been the greatest Nintendo lovers,Nintendo has sh** relationship with 3rd parties since the end of the Snes days. The PS2 had more games on the making before launch than what the Dreamcast got the whole 3 years that it was alive. Saying the safest bets is PC is a joke,specially if we consider that hardware from the xbox 360 days of release is all but obsolete and unsupported for years now.
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#265 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="jhonMalcovich"]Do you realize that PS4 just doesn´t have many games confirmed ? That at launch it will have probably 9 games, only 2 of them exclusives ? That it will have to sell at least 10M units to be considered viable for exclusives, otherwise WiiU scenario will be repeated?

PC is the safest bet next gen.

tormentos

Dude i will quote your sig i don't spec less than 16 games on PS4 launch,to say the PS4 will have 9 games is a downright joke. The wii U is different and 3rd parties has never been the greatest Nintendo lovers,Nintendo has sh** relationship with 3rd parties since the end of the Snes days. The PS2 had more games on the making before launch than what the Dreamcast got the whole 3 years that it was alive. Saying the safest bets is PC is a joke,specially if we consider that hardware from the xbox 360 days of release is all but obsolete and unsupported for years now.

but PC gaming has the most games, and the most highly rated games. Sounds like a safe bet

Avatar image for JamDev
JamDev

992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#266 JamDev
Member since 2013 • 992 Posts
[QUOTE="Jebus213"]

[QUOTE="MonsieurX"]...for more than a single consoleMonsieurX

 

Are we forgetting that every game on PC makes every game on console look a gen behind?

Every?

Damn straight, Farmville makes Killzone: SF look like Pacman.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#267 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="lostrib"] 12 FPS is a rather large amount. and those numbers are without AA. at 4x AA the 7850 is below 30fps and 7870 is barely above 30, with the 7950 around 40

No 12 FPS is nothing,and yes there was AA FXAA high. And in fact at 1920x1200 which is higher than 1080p, with MSAAX 4 the 7850 is just 10 FPS slower than the 7950,33 FPS on the 7850 43 FPS on the 7950...So yeah not a big deal,even less for the PS4 that is stronger and more efficient than the 7850 and you know it.
Avatar image for harry_james_pot
harry_james_pot

11414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#268 harry_james_pot  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 11414 Posts
...for more than a single consoleMonsieurX
Yeah, well everyone knows PC gaming is more expensive.. But you get what you pay for! Plus the PC games prices balances this out. :)
Avatar image for deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
deactivated-5cd08b1605da1

9317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#269 deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
Member since 2012 • 9317 Posts

I feel bad for people that bought the Titan due to Nvidia hype

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#270 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
but PC gaming has the most games, and the most highly rated games. Sounds like a safe betlostrib
Yeah what does it serve you to have 10 million games,is 9,999,980 of them suck and only 10 are great and 10 more are good,now before you go into your usual trolling it was and example... So yeah quality matter allot,and consoles apparently for some reason had the edge even without the most powerful hardware.
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#271 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"] 12 FPS is a rather large amount. and those numbers are without AA. at 4x AA the 7850 is below 30fps and 7870 is barely above 30, with the 7950 around 40tormentos
No 12 FPS is nothing,and yes there was AA FXAA high. And in fact at 1920x1200 which is higher than 1080p, with MSAAX 4 the 7850 is just 10 FPS slower than the 7950,33 FPS on the 7850 43 FPS on the 7950...So yeah not a big deal,even less for the PS4 that is stronger and more efficient than the 7850 and you know it.

12 FPS is quite a bit.  FXAA is terrible, it makes things all blurry. So now you're changing the situation from 1600p to 1200p? And where can I find proof that the PS4 is stronger and more efficient than 7850?

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#272 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]but PC gaming has the most games, and the most highly rated games. Sounds like a safe bettormentos
Yeah what does it serve you to have 10 million games,is 9,999,980 of them suck and only 10 are great,now before you go into your usual trolling it was and example... So yeah quality matter allot,and consoles apparently for some reason had the edge even without the most powerful hardware.

which part of "the most highly rated games" didn't you understand? As in, the greatest number of high rated games.

Avatar image for MasterX666
MasterX666

359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#273 MasterX666
Member since 2013 • 359 Posts

Hermits still trying to convince others that PC can be cheap at 650$ just for a graphics card LOL

Avatar image for kipsta77
kipsta77

1119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#274 kipsta77
Member since 2012 • 1119 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]but PC gaming has the most games, and the most highly rated games. Sounds like a safe bettormentos
Yeah what does it serve you to have 10 million games,is 9,999,980 of them suck and only 10 are great and 10 more are good,now before you go into your usual trolling it was and example... So yeah quality matter allot,and consoles apparently for some reason had the edge even without the most powerful hardware.

Consoles are becoming more and more irrelevant. The console 'category' is not needed anymore.

How do consoles have 'the edge'?

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#275 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

Hermits still trying to convince others that PC can be cheap at 650$ just for a graphics card LOL

MasterX666

The GTX 780 is an enthusiast level card, not for budget builds

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#276 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
12 FPS is quite a bit.  FXAA is terrible, it makes things all blurry. So now you're changing the situation from 1600p to 1200p? And where can I find proof that the PS4 is stronger and more efficient than 7850?lostrib
No is nothing it just mean something to stupid PC lovers who will spend $600 dollars more for a GPU to get 10 more frames,on consoles it doesn't even matter. And not is not about changing is the fact that on consoles 2560X1600 is not a target and you know it,1080p is and 1200p is a bit higher than 1080p,worst thanks for completely ignoring how the 7950 actually ran 1 frame slower on 1200p than on 1600p when MSAA is bring into the picture the hit is to big even for the 7950,which does 62FPS on that same resolution with FXAA,almost a 20 FPS hit. In fact the hit is bigger on the 7950 in 1200p with MSAA than on the 7850... The hit on the 7850 on 1200p by enabling MSAAX4 is 16 FPS,on the 7950 is 19 FPS. The fact that you are PC gamer that refuse to admit that the PS4 GPU is stronger than the 7850 pretty much prove how mush of a soul less troll you are,you have no argument what so ever,and all you do s spin sh**,.. PS4 GPU 18CU 1152SP 1.84TF Full HSA. 7850 16CU 1024SP 1.76 TF :lol: But but you have any proof tormentos..
Avatar image for Ben-Buja
Ben-Buja

2809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#277 Ben-Buja
Member since 2011 • 2809 Posts

[QUOTE="MasterX666"]

Hermits still trying to convince others that PC can be cheap at 650$ just for a graphics card LOL

lostrib

The GTX 780 is an enthusiast level card, not for budget builds

That will play games for many years at well above console settings.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#278 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

[QUOTE="MasterX666"]

Hermits still trying to convince others that PC can be cheap at 650$ just for a graphics card LOL

lostrib

The GTX 780 is an enthusiast level card, not for budget builds

And a budget cards don't have 780GTX performance...:lol: So you either use the best or your been hypocrite you are on a thread about graphics on a 780GTX not budget GPU,that card cost more than the PS4 will.:lol:
Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#279 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"] 12 FPS is a rather large amount. and those numbers are without AA. at 4x AA the 7850 is below 30fps and 7870 is barely above 30, with the 7950 around 40tormentos
No 12 FPS is nothing,and yes there was AA FXAA high. And in fact at 1920x1200 which is higher than 1080p, with MSAAX 4 the 7850 is just 10 FPS slower than the 7950,33 FPS on the 7850 43 FPS on the 7950...So yeah not a big deal,even less for the PS4 that is stronger and more efficient than the 7850 and you know it.

 

If it was a difference between 30fps and 18 fps then 12fps would be night and day.

So it depends on the total fps and not just the gap.

Oh and give me that crystal ball which seems to tell you the exact power of the PS4.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#280 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

Consoles are becoming more and more irrelevant. The console 'category' is not needed anymore.

How do consoles have 'the edge'?

kipsta77
Yeah that is the reason why sales jumped from 210 million consoles with 4 different consoles,to 250 million this gen and counting with just 3 consoles..
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#281 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]12 FPS is quite a bit.  FXAA is terrible, it makes things all blurry. So now you're changing the situation from 1600p to 1200p? And where can I find proof that the PS4 is stronger and more efficient than 7850?tormentos
No is nothing it just mean something to stupid PC lovers who will spend $600 dollars more for a GPU to get 10 more frames,on consoles it doesn't even matter. And not is not about changing is the fact that on consoles 2560X1600 is not a target and you know it,1080p is and 1200p is a bit higher than 1080p,worst thanks for completely ignoring how the 7950 actually ran 1 frame slower on 1200p than on 1600p when MSAA is bring into the picture the hit is to big even for the 7950,which does 62FPS on that same resolution with FXAA,almost a 20 FPS hit. In fact the hit is bigger on the 7950 in 1200p with MSAA than on the 7850... The hit on the 7850 on 1200p by enabling MSAAX4 is 16 FPS,on the 7950 is 19 FPS. The fact that you are PC gamer that refuse to admit that the PS4 GPU is stronger than the 7850 pretty much prove how mush of a soul less troll you are,you have no argument what so ever,and all you do s spin sh**,.. PS4 GPU 18CU 1152SP 1.84TF Full HSA. 7850 16CU 1024SP 1.76 TF :lol: But but you have any proof tormentos..

Then why did you bring up numbers for 1600p in the first place?  And no matter what you think, 12 fps is a significant increase.  also, you have yet to give any source where you are pulling these numbers from.  And sorry if I don't blindly accept your claim that the PS4 is stronger and more efficient than 7850. If you are going to state that as fact, then you better have proof that backs it up.

Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#282 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="MasterX666"]

Hermits still trying to convince others that PC can be cheap at 650$ just for a graphics card LOL

tormentos

The GTX 780 is an enthusiast level card, not for budget builds

And a budget cards don't have 780GTX performance...:lol: So you either use the best or your been hypocrite you are on a thread about graphics on a 780GTX not budget GPU,that card cost more than the PS4 will.:lol:

 

By the time the PS4 comes out prices will be dropped anyway.

A 7850 will be very cheap by then and you could OC it for a lot better performance.

Personally I am waiting for the Maxwell series to come out early next year since it is a completely new GPU design and should have a huge boost in performance compared to the GTX 700 series.

I am hoping for a performance difference of 9800GTX to GTX 280 or GTX 280 to GTX 480 which was about an 80% difference.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#283 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="MasterX666"]

Hermits still trying to convince others that PC can be cheap at 650$ just for a graphics card LOL

tormentos

The GTX 780 is an enthusiast level card, not for budget builds

And a budget cards don't have 780GTX performance...:lol: So you either use the best or your been hypocrite you are on a thread about graphics on a 780GTX not budget GPU,that card cost more than the PS4 will.:lol:

I was responding to his claim that PC gaming can't be cheap because of the existence of a $650 GPU.  780 is a high end card, there are cheaper budget friendly cards that give good performance 

Avatar image for kipsta77
kipsta77

1119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#284 kipsta77
Member since 2012 • 1119 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="MasterX666"]

Hermits still trying to convince others that PC can be cheap at 650$ just for a graphics card LOL

tormentos

The GTX 780 is an enthusiast level card, not for budget builds

And a budget cards don't have 780GTX performance...:lol: So you either use the best or your been hypocrite you are on a thread about graphics on a 780GTX not budget GPU,that card cost more than the PS4 will.:lol:

Moral of the story: When you try to compare ps4 hardware to a midrange pc's, its a joke.

Consoles aim for 720p/60fps or 1080p/30fps, 90% of PC gamers ARE NOT satisfied with that.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#285 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
If it was a difference between 30fps and 18 fps then 12fps would be night and day.

So it depends on the total fps and not just the gap.

Oh and give me that crystal ball which seems to tell you the exact power of the PS4.

RyviusARC
33 FPS vs 43 FPS is nothing and will barely be seen,in fact many consoles games actually hover over 30 FPS.
Avatar image for PernicioEnigma
PernicioEnigma

6663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#286 PernicioEnigma
Member since 2010 • 6663 Posts

Every one of those cost more than a single next gen console, no doubt. 

Puckhog04
Probably, but high end PC gaming doesn't make compromises for people who don't have the cash.
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#287 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="RyviusARC"]If it was a difference between 30fps and 18 fps then 12fps would be night and day.

So it depends on the total fps and not just the gap.

Oh and give me that crystal ball which seems to tell you the exact power of the PS4.

tormentos

33 FPS vs 43 FPS is nothing and will barely be seen,in fact many consoles games actually hover over 30 FPS.

except if you're at 43 and your frames drop 5-10fps you're still above 30.  If you're at 33, then you drop below 30 FPS

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#288 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="lostrib"]

The GTX 780 is an enthusiast level card, not for budget builds

kipsta77

And a budget cards don't have 780GTX performance...:lol: So you either use the best or your been hypocrite you are on a thread about graphics on a 780GTX not budget GPU,that card cost more than the PS4 will.:lol:

Moral of the story: When you try to compare ps4 hardware to a midrange pc's, its a joke.

Consoles aim for 720p/60fps or 1080p/30fps, 90% of PC gamers ARE NOT satisfied with that.

By steam stats you are full of sh**... 1080p is the most used res with only 30% penetration,fallow by more than 20% that game on basically just a bit higher than 720p. Most gamers also have 1GB cards which are not the greatest for 1080p 60FPS either in many games...
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#289 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="RyviusARC"]If it was a difference between 30fps and 18 fps then 12fps would be night and day.

So it depends on the total fps and not just the gap.

Oh and give me that crystal ball which seems to tell you the exact power of the PS4.

lostrib

33 FPS vs 43 FPS is nothing and will barely be seen,in fact many consoles games actually hover over 30 FPS.

except if you're at 43 and your frames drop 5-10fps you're still above 30.  If you're at 33, then you drop below 30 FPS

That is the problem on PC drops are way bigger than on consoles that is a fact,even the Titan at 1080p will hit 30 FPS while never reaching 60 on Crysis 3,on very high,it will hit the high 50,most consoles games get lock at 30,or close and few sink way deep,probably Crysis 3 is one of the worst offenders,but that is not the PS3 fault,since Killzone 3 is 720P not sub HD like crysis 2 or 3 and stay pretty much lock on 30.
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#290 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"] 33 FPS vs 43 FPS is nothing and will barely be seen,in fact many consoles games actually hover over 30 FPS.tormentos

except if you're at 43 and your frames drop 5-10fps you're still above 30.  If you're at 33, then you drop below 30 FPS

That is the problem on PC drops are way bigger than on consoles that is a fact,even the Titan at 1080p will hit 30 FPS while never reaching 60 on Crysis 3,on very high,it will hit the high 50,most consoles games get lock at 30,or close and few sink way deep,probably Crysis 3 is one of the worst offenders,but that is not the PS3 fault,since Killzone 3 is 720P not sub HD like crysis 2 or 3 and stay pretty much lock on 30.

if you use the word fact, you should have facts to back it up.  

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#291 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="kipsta77"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"] And a budget cards don't have 780GTX performance...:lol: So you either use the best or your been hypocrite you are on a thread about graphics on a 780GTX not budget GPU,that card cost more than the PS4 will.:lol:tormentos

Moral of the story: When you try to compare ps4 hardware to a midrange pc's, its a joke.

Consoles aim for 720p/60fps or 1080p/30fps, 90% of PC gamers ARE NOT satisfied with that.

By steam stats you are full of sh**... 1080p is the most used res with only 30% penetration,fallow by more than 20% that game on basically just a bit higher than 720p. Most gamers also have 1GB cards which are not the greatest for 1080p 60FPS either in many games...

if you look at steam stats, the vast majority is above 720p, and then there are all the people with multimonitor set ups

Avatar image for kipsta77
kipsta77

1119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#292 kipsta77
Member since 2012 • 1119 Posts

[QUOTE="kipsta77"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"] And a budget cards don't have 780GTX performance...:lol: So you either use the best or your been hypocrite you are on a thread about graphics on a 780GTX not budget GPU,that card cost more than the PS4 will.:lol:tormentos

Moral of the story: When you try to compare ps4 hardware to a midrange pc's, its a joke.

Consoles aim for 720p/60fps or 1080p/30fps, 90% of PC gamers ARE NOT satisfied with that.

By steam stats you are full of sh**... 1080p is the most used res with only 30% penetration,fallow by more than 20% that game on basically just a bit higher than 720p. Most gamers also have 1GB cards which are not the greatest for 1080p 60FPS either in many games...

Steam stats isn't worthy info. Not everyone takes the survey as it is optional. I didn't.

Many PC gamers are gaming at 1440p or even 1600p.

Just admit you can't win. I'll be here all day.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#294 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
I see Tomentos is still chatting shit.
Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#295 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]12 FPS is quite a bit.  FXAA is terrible, it makes things all blurry. So now you're changing the situation from 1600p to 1200p? And where can I find proof that the PS4 is stronger and more efficient than 7850?tormentos
No is nothing it just mean something to stupid PC lovers who will spend $600 dollars more for a GPU to get 10 more frames,on consoles it doesn't even matter. And not is not about changing is the fact that on consoles 2560X1600 is not a target and you know it,1080p is and 1200p is a bit higher than 1080p,worst thanks for completely ignoring how the 7950 actually ran 1 frame slower on 1200p than on 1600p when MSAA is bring into the picture the hit is to big even for the 7950,which does 62FPS on that same resolution with FXAA,almost a 20 FPS hit. In fact the hit is bigger on the 7950 in 1200p with MSAA than on the 7850... The hit on the 7850 on 1200p by enabling MSAAX4 is 16 FPS,on the 7950 is 19 FPS. The fact that you are PC gamer that refuse to admit that the PS4 GPU is stronger than the 7850 pretty much prove how mush of a soul less troll you are,you have no argument what so ever,and all you do s spin sh**,.. PS4 GPU 18CU 1152SP 1.84TF Full HSA. 7850 16CU 1024SP 1.76 TF :lol: But but you have any proof tormentos..

 

The PS4's GPU is based on the 7970m but with 2 CU removed.

The 7970m performs in the middle of a 7850 and 7870.

Compare specs between the 7970m and 7870.

 

7970= 20CU 1280SP 2176 GFLOPS

7870= 20CU 1280SP 2560 GFLOPS


Now the 7870 is still easily beats the 7970m

And the PS4 is a gimped version of the 7970m

The 7850 when overclocked can match or exceed the stock 7870 performance.

 

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#296 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="kipsta77"]

Moral of the story: When you try to compare ps4 hardware to a midrange pc's, its a joke.

Consoles aim for 720p/60fps or 1080p/30fps, 90% of PC gamers ARE NOT satisfied with that.

kipsta77

By steam stats you are full of sh**... 1080p is the most used res with only 30% penetration,fallow by more than 20% that game on basically just a bit higher than 720p. Most gamers also have 1GB cards which are not the greatest for 1080p 60FPS either in many games...

Steam stats isn't worthy info. Not everyone takes the survey as it is optional. I didn't.

Many PC gamers are gaming at 1440p or even 1600p.

Just admit you can't win. I'll be here all day.

How do you feel about the 780 performing so close to a Titan while costing less?
Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#297 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

[QUOTE="RyviusARC"]If it was a difference between 30fps and 18 fps then 12fps would be night and day.

So it depends on the total fps and not just the gap.

Oh and give me that crystal ball which seems to tell you the exact power of the PS4.

tormentos

33 FPS vs 43 FPS is nothing and will barely be seen,in fact many consoles games actually hover over 30 FPS.

 

And a lot of console games drop into the 20s and teens.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#298 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

I see Tomentos is still chatting shit. clyde46

I don't think he's ever been right in all the times I've "debated" with him. Except maybe the time I thought AMD had made a 7870 ghz, when I was thinking of 7970ghz ed

Avatar image for avshaman
avshaman

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#299 avshaman
Member since 2013 • 86 Posts

Nobody makes games for the PC anymore except Valve and they still use the 9 years old Source Engine. So who cares about $650 graphics cards if the games are designed for last-gen hardware? The days of beefy graphics cards winning the war are over. Only good games can win this battle with the next-gen, and so far the consoles are creaming us. Valve is too busy making trading cards on Steam, no chance we will see Half-Life 3 anytime soon.SKaREO

This is what I have been saying. I like gaming on PCs and i have been gaming on them regularly since ps1 generation and sporatically before then, but nobody really makes big, graphically advanced games for the Pc exclusively any more. Basically we play cleaner, faster running multiplats and low-budget indie games, RTSs and MMORPGS.

PS4 is going to change the whole landscape. It is such a leap ahead of the Xbox One that multiplats are going to be quite polished already on the PS4, and PC will really only be if you want to go really big and game on multiple monitors, or super high res monitors. But past 1080p it really begins to reach a point of diminishing returns for me. As long as  a game has a fairly solid frame rate and decent anti-aliasing I am golden.

Avatar image for kipsta77
kipsta77

1119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#300 kipsta77
Member since 2012 • 1119 Posts

[QUOTE="kipsta77"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"] By steam stats you are full of sh**... 1080p is the most used res with only 30% penetration,fallow by more than 20% that game on basically just a bit higher than 720p. Most gamers also have 1GB cards which are not the greatest for 1080p 60FPS either in many games...clyde46

Steam stats isn't worthy info. Not everyone takes the survey as it is optional. I didn't.

Many PC gamers are gaming at 1440p or even 1600p.

Just admit you can't win. I'll be here all day.

How do you feel about the 780 performing so close to a Titan while costing less?

It's an excellent cards no doubt. The Titan ever slightly outperforms it. If both cards came out at the same time i still would have got the titan mainly because of the amount of vram, it gives me more flexibility to upgrade to a higher res screen in the future.

Can't really go wrong.