PC to be destroyed next year. Xbox 720 specs= AMD 7990. 16 Core CPU, 4GB Ram

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for reach3
reach3

1600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#401 reach3
Member since 2012 • 1600 Posts

[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="krayzieE99"] you have no clue what you are talking about. when the 360 released it did NOT match or even come close to beating the best PC. keep on reach3n.wis3boi

wrong. Oblivion on 360 looked better than pc .

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

1109D77B56AC5EC0B75A4208BB603D01A058D15D

EB37D5AB6BC1EB2188D868BEA7F66F6B76026BB6

360 couldn't even get 20fps outdoors and it didn't even have most of the shadows enabled...most of the game ran on medium

No, the devs said themselves 360 version is better. Looks the same, with the bonus of performance optimization. So was technical graphics king, and by the time pc ran oblivion better, GEars came out for 360. Which further kept 360 as technical graphcis king. Which is retained until Crysis. It took pc THAT long to catch up the 360 (as it was very much ahead of its time). With these specs, pcs won't catch up to 720 until 720 is at the end of its gen.
Avatar image for reach3
reach3

1600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#402 reach3
Member since 2012 • 1600 Posts

[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="Captain__Tripps"] Umm, Crysis came out a year after Gears. lostrib

And before Gears came out, 360 was still technical graphics king with Oblivion. So 360 was graphics king for years until pc matched it

Which also came out in 2006...so you had about a year of having graphics on par with high performance PCs and then got destroyed for next five years

Nope Kameo, Perfect Dark Zero and PGR 3 were graphics kings over pc as well on 360 launch. Then came Oblivion (which further kept 360 graphics king, then GEars (same) and Gears retained it until 2007 pc game. Took pc forever to catch up, which is sad. It will take even longer with 720.
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#403 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

[QUOTE="reach3"] I am talking on release date. 360 version was light years ahead in performance and costs thousands less. Also, GEars released on pc right before crysis came out. So my pint still stands, 360 was graphcis king and took 3 years for pc to match it. 720 will take pc 8 years to match reach3

360 wasn't graphics king with PCs equiped with Radeon X1900 (beyond 720p). Gears1 feels like UT3 with less color range.

I am speaking technical graphics. No game matched Gears on 360 until Crysis came out. Took 3 years, as i said

Technical wise, gears1 uses the same engine as UT3.

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#404 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

No, the devs said themselves 360 version is better. Looks the same, with the bonus of performance optimization. So was technical graphics king, and by the time pc ran oblivion better, GEars came out for 360. Which further kept 360 as technical graphcis king. Which is retained until Crysis. It took pc THAT long to catch up the 360 (as it was very much ahead of its time). With these specs, pcs won't catch up to 720 until 720 is at the end of its gen. reach3

You are an idiot.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#405 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="reach3"] wrong. Oblivion on 360 looked better than pc .reach3

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

1109D77B56AC5EC0B75A4208BB603D01A058D15D

EB37D5AB6BC1EB2188D868BEA7F66F6B76026BB6

360 couldn't even get 20fps outdoors and it didn't even have most of the shadows enabled...most of the game ran on medium

No, the devs said themselves 360 version is better. Looks the same, with the bonus of performance optimization. So was technical graphics king, and by the time pc ran oblivion better, GEars came out for 360. Which further kept 360 as technical graphcis king. Which is retained until Crysis. It took pc THAT long to catch up the 360 (as it was very much ahead of its time). With these specs, pcs won't catch up to 720 until 720 is at the end of its gen.

you have a very sad life if all oyu do is make sh*t up on forums to feel like a badass

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#406 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="reach3"] And before Gears came out, 360 was still technical graphics king with Oblivion. So 360 was graphics king for years until pc matched itreach3

Which also came out in 2006...so you had about a year of having graphics on par with high performance PCs and then got destroyed for next five years

Nope Kameo, Perfect Dark Zero and PGR 3 were graphics kings over pc as well on 360 launch. Then came Oblivion (which further kept 360 graphics king, then GEars (same) and Gears retained it until 2007 pc game. Took pc forever to catch up, which is sad. It will take even longer with 720.

Yeah, none of that is true. The PC wont have to do any catching up. But you keep living in your delusional, idiot world.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#407 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="reach3"] wrong. Oblivion on 360 looked better than pc .reach3

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

360 couldn't even get 20fps outdoors and it didn't even have most of the shadows enabled...most of the game ran on medium

No, the devs said themselves 360 version is better. Looks the same, with the bonus of performance optimization. So was technical graphics king, and by the time pc ran oblivion better, GEars came out for 360. Which further kept 360 as technical graphcis king. Which is retained until Crysis. It took pc THAT long to catch up the 360 (as it was very much ahead of its time). With these specs, pcs won't catch up to 720 until 720 is at the end of its gen.

Luckily, there wouldn't be another unified shader design shift and AMD is mostly a PC company.

AMD GCN was first on the x86 PC and GCN includes PC's x86-64 IP. AMD plans to have an array processor like Intel's Larrabee (x86 based GPU), but with Radeon HD's DNA..

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#408 silversix_  Online
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts
Reach3 HAS to be loosingends... reading what he said reminds me when i was 11 and for the first time i discovered gaming forums...
Avatar image for reach3
reach3

1600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#409 reach3
Member since 2012 • 1600 Posts

[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="wis3boi"]

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

360 couldn't even get 20fps outdoors and it didn't even have most of the shadows enabled...most of the game ran on medium

ronvalencia

No, the devs said themselves 360 version is better. Looks the same, with the bonus of performance optimization. So was technical graphics king, and by the time pc ran oblivion better, GEars came out for 360. Which further kept 360 as technical graphcis king. Which is retained until Crysis. It took pc THAT long to catch up the 360 (as it was very much ahead of its time). With these specs, pcs won't catch up to 720 until 720 is at the end of its gen.

Luckily, there wouldn't be another unified shader design shift and AMD is mostly a PC company.

AMD themselves said 720 will have Avatar like graphics. What is your response for that? They are making 720 chips, I think they know more than some hermits and what 720 will do. These specs will easily achieve that while pc will struggle to get half the graphics 720 can
Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#410 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

Reach3 HAS to be loosingends... reading what he said reminds me when i was 11 and for the first time i discovered gaming forums...silversix_

I think he may be the same person, or it is possible that they just share the same genetic defects.

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#411 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

[QUOTE="reach3"] No, the devs said themselves 360 version is better. Looks the same, with the bonus of performance optimization. So was technical graphics king, and by the time pc ran oblivion better, GEars came out for 360. Which further kept 360 as technical graphcis king. Which is retained until Crysis. It took pc THAT long to catch up the 360 (as it was very much ahead of its time). With these specs, pcs won't catch up to 720 until 720 is at the end of its gen. reach3

Luckily, there wouldn't be another unified shader design shift and AMD is mostly a PC company.

AMD themselves said 720 will have Avatar like graphics. What is your response for that? They are making 720 chips, I think they know more than some hermits and what 720 will do. These specs will easily achieve that while pc will struggle to get half the graphics 720 can

FF Agnes shows the tech next gen games will use and definatly looks like CGI in an amazing way

PC is already totally obsolete, but next gen i think will be even worst for hermits, noone will care for graphics now that

1. consoles will have CGI looking games

2. MS may introduce online rendering and take it to the next step

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#412 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="ronvalencia"] Luckily, there wouldn't be another unified shader design shift and AMD is mostly a PC company.

loosingENDS

AMD themselves said 720 will have Avatar like graphics. What is your response for that? They are making 720 chips, I think they know more than some hermits and what 720 will do. These specs will easily achieve that while pc will struggle to get half the graphics 720 can

FF Agnes shows the tech next gen games will use and definatly looks like CGI in an amazing way

PC is already totally obsolete, but next gen i think will be even worst for hermits, noone will care for graphics now that

1. consoles will have CGI looking games

2. MS may introduce online rendering and take it to the next step

You are still an idiot.

Avatar image for reach3
reach3

1600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#413 reach3
Member since 2012 • 1600 Posts

[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="ronvalencia"] Luckily, there wouldn't be another unified shader design shift and AMD is mostly a PC company.

loosingENDS

AMD themselves said 720 will have Avatar like graphics. What is your response for that? They are making 720 chips, I think they know more than some hermits and what 720 will do. These specs will easily achieve that while pc will struggle to get half the graphics 720 can

FF Agnes shows the tech next gen games will use and definatly looks like CGI in an amazing way

PC is already totally obsolete, but next gen i think will be even worst for hermits, noone will care for graphics now that

1. consoles will have CGI looking games

2. MS may introduce online rendering and take it to the next step

Very true, I couldnt believe that FF demo. Thanks to 720 specs, CGi graphics are finally achieved. I mean, look at the best pc offers, Agnes makes pc best games look like ps2 lol and thats not even exagerrating lol
Avatar image for Nanomage
Nanomage

2371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#414 Nanomage
Member since 2011 • 2371 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="reach3"] AMD themselves said 720 will have Avatar like graphics. What is your response for that? They are making 720 chips, I think they know more than some hermits and what 720 will do. These specs will easily achieve that while pc will struggle to get half the graphics 720 can tenaka2

FF Agnes shows the tech next gen games will use and definatly looks like CGI in an amazing way

PC is already totally obsolete, but next gen i think will be even worst for hermits, noone will care for graphics now that

1. consoles will have CGI looking games

2. MS may introduce online rendering and take it to the next step

You are still an idiot.

You are still feeding him,wich at the very least puts you at the same level as him and you´re only giving him what he wants,attention.
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#416 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts
[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

[QUOTE="reach3"] No, the devs said themselves 360 version is better. Looks the same, with the bonus of performance optimization. So was technical graphics king, and by the time pc ran oblivion better, GEars came out for 360. Which further kept 360 as technical graphcis king. Which is retained until Crysis. It took pc THAT long to catch up the 360 (as it was very much ahead of its time). With these specs, pcs won't catch up to 720 until 720 is at the end of its gen. reach3

Luckily, there wouldn't be another unified shader design shift and AMD is mostly a PC company.

AMD themselves said 720 will have Avatar like graphics. What is your response for that? They are making 720 chips, I think they know more than some hermits and what 720 will do. These specs will easily achieve that while pc will struggle to get half the graphics 720 can

AMD's Cinema 2.0 demos has shown some real time ray-tracing (with reflections), but the voxel data set is very large i.e. +8GB. The tech demos runs on PCs. AMD hasn't specifically defined the word "like".
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#417 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="reach3"] AMD themselves said 720 will have Avatar like graphics. What is your response for that? They are making 720 chips, I think they know more than some hermits and what 720 will do. These specs will easily achieve that while pc will struggle to get half the graphics 720 can reach3

FF Agnes shows the tech next gen games will use and definatly looks like CGI in an amazing way

PC is already totally obsolete, but next gen i think will be even worst for hermits, noone will care for graphics now that

1. consoles will have CGI looking games

2. MS may introduce online rendering and take it to the next step

Very true, I couldnt believe that FF demo. Thanks to 720 specs, CGi graphics are finally achieved. I mean, look at the best pc offers, Agnes makes pc best games look like ps2 lol and thats not even exagerrating lol

The recent tech demos was being run on the current Q1 2012 era gaming PCs.

Avatar image for reach3
reach3

1600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#418 reach3
Member since 2012 • 1600 Posts

[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

FF Agnes shows the tech next gen games will use and definatly looks like CGI in an amazing way

PC is already totally obsolete, but next gen i think will be even worst for hermits, noone will care for graphics now that

1. consoles will have CGI looking games

2. MS may introduce online rendering and take it to the next step

ronvalencia

Very true, I couldnt believe that FF demo. Thanks to 720 specs, CGi graphics are finally achieved. I mean, look at the best pc offers, Agnes makes pc best games look like ps2 lol and thats not even exagerrating lol

The recent tech demos was being run on the current Q1 2012 era gaming PCs.

and yet pc games look nothing like that. just goes to show pc gaming is a joke. 720 will actually achieve those graphics while pc will wish to
Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#419 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="wis3boi"]

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

1109D77B56AC5EC0B75A4208BB603D01A058D15D

EB37D5AB6BC1EB2188D868BEA7F66F6B76026BB6

360 couldn't even get 20fps outdoors and it didn't even have most of the shadows enabled...most of the game ran on medium

wis3boi

No, the devs said themselves 360 version is better. Looks the same, with the bonus of performance optimization. So was technical graphics king, and by the time pc ran oblivion better, GEars came out for 360. Which further kept 360 as technical graphcis king. Which is retained until Crysis. It took pc THAT long to catch up the 360 (as it was very much ahead of its time). With these specs, pcs won't catch up to 720 until 720 is at the end of its gen.

you have a very sad life if all oyu do is make sh*t up on forums to feel like a badass

he's a failure, if he actually believes all the absurdity he says or hes trolling people you would have to be pretty fuking stupid either way

Avatar image for jim1174
jim1174

301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#420 jim1174
Member since 2003 • 301 Posts

Any thing a console can do a pc can do even better. the 720 will be better than a pc when it first comes out then 6 months latter pcs will be better

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#421 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

[QUOTE="reach3"] Very true, I couldnt believe that FF demo. Thanks to 720 specs, CGi graphics are finally achieved. I mean, look at the best pc offers, Agnes makes pc best games look like ps2 lol and thats not even exagerrating lolreach3

The recent tech demos was being run on the current Q1 2012 era gaming PCs.

and yet pc games look nothing like that. just goes to show pc gaming is a joke. 720 will actually achieve those graphics while pc will wish to

Your assertions are mostly subjective.

What's special about "Square Enix Next-Gen Engine " tech demo? Reference http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HdGxUyGc1tg

It got some issues with lights and GI(if it exist). http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=HdGxUyGc1tg#t=151s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=HdGxUyGc1tg#t=160s

I don't see SQ's FF tech demo to beat Crysis PC with mods. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qq7-hTVP9AE&feature=related

CryEngine 3 tech demo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3EI5i6WeG8&feature=related without current consoles holding back gaming PCs.

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#422 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

Oblivion on 360 looked better than pc and Gears 1 was graphics king until Crysis 1 came out. Took 3 years for pc to match 360. With 720's specs and optimization, I wouldn't be surprised if it took pc 8 years to match.reach3

Even Gamespot's 360 review mentioned the PC version can be "even better-looking" than the 360 version.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#423 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Mac user, talking on how pcs need to be expensive to play games. My advice to you, sell your mac, go to the garbage trucks, find spare parts to build and old pc or ask someone to gift you one and you can continue do more with your old pc and spend your mac money on consoles.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#424 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="ronvalencia"] Luckily, there wouldn't be another unified shader design shift and AMD is mostly a PC company.

loosingENDS

AMD themselves said 720 will have Avatar like graphics. What is your response for that? They are making 720 chips, I think they know more than some hermits and what 720 will do. These specs will easily achieve that while pc will struggle to get half the graphics 720 can

FF Agnes shows the tech next gen games will use and definatly looks like CGI in an amazing way

PC is already totally obsolete, but next gen i think will be even worst for hermits, noone will care for graphics now that

1. consoles will have CGI looking games

2. MS may introduce online rendering and take it to the next step

what the? i dont even? Nearly everything you saw in e3 was demoed on a pc. Pcs are not expensive and you will NEVER reach cgi quality, becasue its cgi, its prerendered, its impossible to reach that quality. The new cosnoles will be super expensive, most developers are afraid of them, chances are that smaller devs will go back to pc when developing games is cheaper and the AAA morons will be controlled by ms and sony and work on identical games that are funded by ms and sony. oblivion did not look better on the 360 and gears of war was not a graphically impressive game, the damn thing did not even have dynamic lighting a feature that pcs used since 96.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#425 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="YearoftheSnake5"]

Well, hopes and speculation seem to be in the stratosphere at this point.

reach3
Was the same before 360 launch, and Microsoft delivered a system that brought pc to its knees. It took 3 years for pc to catch up to 360 with crysis 1.

Oh please dude shut up the xbox 360 wasn't bringing anything to its knees,by early 2006 the 7900GTX even without HDR+AA enable was beating the 360. ""Oblivion looks better on a high-end PC than on the Xbox 360. Note the additional foliage visible in the background. We matched up resolutions for screenshot comparison purposes here, but a high-end PC with an AMD Athlon FX-60 CPU and GeForce 7900 GTX graphics card can enable all the settings and take resolutions up to 1600x1200 or more and still maintain smooth frame rates. We noticed that the Xbox 360 version had better antialiasing since our PC version couldn't enable HDR and antialiasing at the same time. Of course on the PC version, you can get rid of jaggies the old-fashioned way by jacking up the resolution."" http://www.gamespot.com/features/the-elder-scrolls-iv-oblivion-xbox-360-versus-pc-6147028/?page=2 The comparison was make by this own site. The 7900GTX could not even do HDR+AA at the same time,still beat the 360 version,and look what he say,they were matching the 360 version resolution,but the PC version could be crack up and still keep smooth frame rates,that was on March 2006 the 360 was just 4 months old.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#426 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="reach3"] wrong. Oblivion on 360 looked better than pc and Gears 1 was graphics king until Crysis 1 came out. Took 3 years for pc to match 360. With 720's specs and optimization, I wouldn't be surprised if it took pc 8 years to match.

Ahem Gears of war was beat by Uncharted 1 just 1 year after Gears landed on 2007,after that Gears has not been look in the same way,Gears 2 wasn't more impressive that Uncharted 2 or even Killzone 2,and Gears 3 well we know the story,Uncharted 3 170+ awards.... Edit.. You even contradict your self in your own post is gold.. You claim that Gears wasn't beat until Crysis 1,but then you say that it took the PS 3 years to match not beat match the 360.. Crysis was release on November 2007 2 years after the 360 was launch not even that you got right.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#427 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

[QUOTE="reach3"] No, the devs said themselves 360 version is better. Looks the same, with the bonus of performance optimization. So was technical graphics king, and by the time pc ran oblivion better, GEars came out for 360. Which further kept 360 as technical graphcis king. Which is retained until Crysis. It took pc THAT long to catch up the 360 (as it was very much ahead of its time). With these specs, pcs won't catch up to 720 until 720 is at the end of its gen. reach3

Luckily, there wouldn't be another unified shader design shift and AMD is mostly a PC company.

AMD themselves said 720 will have Avatar like graphics. What is your response for that? They are making 720 chips, I think they know more than some hermits and what 720 will do. These specs will easily achieve that while pc will struggle to get half the graphics 720 can

Yeah and Balmer say developers were getting Toy Story graphics out of the original xbox...lol
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#428 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts
[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="YearoftheSnake5"]

Well, hopes and speculation seem to be in the stratosphere at this point.

tormentos
Was the same before 360 launch, and Microsoft delivered a system that brought pc to its knees. It took 3 years for pc to catch up to 360 with crysis 1.

Oh please dude shut up the xbox 360 wasn't bringing anything to its knees,by early 2006 the 7900GTX even without HDR+AA enable was beating the 360. ""Oblivion looks better on a high-end PC than on the Xbox 360. Note the additional foliage visible in the background. We matched up resolutions for screenshot comparison purposes here, but a high-end PC with an AMD Athlon FX-60 CPU and GeForce 7900 GTX graphics card can enable all the settings and take resolutions up to 1600x1200 or more and still maintain smooth frame rates. We noticed that the Xbox 360 version had better antialiasing since our PC version couldn't enable HDR and antialiasing at the same time. Of course on the PC version, you can get rid of jaggies the old-fashioned way by jacking up the resolution."" http://www.gamespot.com/features/the-elder-scrolls-iv-oblivion-xbox-360-versus-pc-6147028/?page=2 The comparison was make by this own site. The 7900GTX could not even do HDR+AA at the same time,still beat the 360 version,and look what he say,they were matching the 360 version resolution,but the PC version could be crack up and still keep smooth frame rates,that was on March 2006 the 360 was just 4 months old.

X1900 version can do MSAA + HDR FP.
Avatar image for reach3
reach3

1600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#429 reach3
Member since 2012 • 1600 Posts

[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="YearoftheSnake5"]

Well, hopes and speculation seem to be in the stratosphere at this point.

tormentos

Was the same before 360 launch, and Microsoft delivered a system that brought pc to its knees. It took 3 years for pc to catch up to 360 with crysis 1.

Oh please dude shut up the xbox 360 wasn't bringing anything to its knees,by early 2006 the 7900GTX even without HDR+AA enable was beating the 360. ""Oblivion looks better on a high-end PC than on the Xbox 360. Note the additional foliage visible in the background. We matched up resolutions for screenshot comparison purposes here, but a high-end PC with an AMD Athlon FX-60 CPU and GeForce 7900 GTX graphics card can enable all the settings and take resolutions up to 1600x1200 or more and still maintain smooth frame rates. We noticed that the Xbox 360 version had better antialiasing since our PC version couldn't enable HDR and antialiasing at the same time. Of course on the PC version, you can get rid of jaggies the old-fashioned way by jacking up the resolution."" http://www.gamespot.com/features/the-elder-scrolls-iv-oblivion-xbox-360-versus-pc-6147028/?page=2 The comparison was make by this own site. The 7900GTX could not even do HDR+AA at the same time,still beat the 360 version,and look what he say,they were matching the 360 version resolution,but the PC version could be crack up and still keep smooth frame rates,that was on March 2006 the 360 was just 4 months old.

Yes it did bring pc the its knees. Oblivion ran better on 360 and even Bethesda said so. They made the game, I think they know more than you do and garbage gamespot. Second, Gears was far ahead of any pc game in technical graphics

gears-of-war-marcus-beautiful-architectu

compared to F.E.A.R the best pc graphics at that time (lol)

fear3.jpg

360 slaughtered pc in every way for until Crysis. Stop the denial and quit being fanboys. Just look at the pic. Fear was garbage to GEars and it was the best pc had

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#430 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="reach3"] Was the same before 360 launch, and Microsoft delivered a system that brought pc to its knees. It took 3 years for pc to catch up to 360 with crysis 1.reach3

Oh please dude shut up the xbox 360 wasn't bringing anything to its knees,by early 2006 the 7900GTX even without HDR+AA enable was beating the 360. ""Oblivion looks better on a high-end PC than on the Xbox 360. Note the additional foliage visible in the background. We matched up resolutions for screenshot comparison purposes here, but a high-end PC with an AMD Athlon FX-60 CPU and GeForce 7900 GTX graphics card can enable all the settings and take resolutions up to 1600x1200 or more and still maintain smooth frame rates. We noticed that the Xbox 360 version had better antialiasing since our PC version couldn't enable HDR and antialiasing at the same time. Of course on the PC version, you can get rid of jaggies the old-fashioned way by jacking up the resolution."" http://www.gamespot.com/features/the-elder-scrolls-iv-oblivion-xbox-360-versus-pc-6147028/?page=2 The comparison was make by this own site. The 7900GTX could not even do HDR+AA at the same time,still beat the 360 version,and look what he say,they were matching the 360 version resolution,but the PC version could be crack up and still keep smooth frame rates,that was on March 2006 the 360 was just 4 months old.

Yes it did bring pc the its knees. Oblivion ran better on 360 and even Bethesda said so. They made the game, I think they know more than you do and garbage gamespot. Second, Gears was far ahead of any pc game in technical graphics

gears-of-war-marcus-beautiful-architectu

compared to F.E.A.R the best pc graphics at that time (lol)

fear3.jpg

360 slaughtered pc in every way for until Crysis. Stop the denial and quit being fanboys. Just look at the pic. Fear was garbage to GEars and it was the best pc had

Why does FEAR look better? Gears only came out a year later on PC....
Avatar image for themagicbum9720
themagicbum9720

6536

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#431 themagicbum9720
Member since 2007 • 6536 Posts
wow this thread is still going on? we all know that reach has no idea what he's talking about, why even bother?
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#432 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="reach3"] Was the same before 360 launch, and Microsoft delivered a system that brought pc to its knees. It took 3 years for pc to catch up to 360 with crysis 1.reach3

Oh please dude shut up the xbox 360 wasn't bringing anything to its knees,by early 2006 the 7900GTX even without HDR+AA enable was beating the 360. ""Oblivion looks better on a high-end PC than on the Xbox 360. Note the additional foliage visible in the background. We matched up resolutions for screenshot comparison purposes here, but a high-end PC with an AMD Athlon FX-60 CPU and GeForce 7900 GTX graphics card can enable all the settings and take resolutions up to 1600x1200 or more and still maintain smooth frame rates. We noticed that the Xbox 360 version had better antialiasing since our PC version couldn't enable HDR and antialiasing at the same time. Of course on the PC version, you can get rid of jaggies the old-fashioned way by jacking up the resolution."" http://www.gamespot.com/features/the-elder-scrolls-iv-oblivion-xbox-360-versus-pc-6147028/?page=2 The comparison was make by this own site. The 7900GTX could not even do HDR+AA at the same time,still beat the 360 version,and look what he say,they were matching the 360 version resolution,but the PC version could be crack up and still keep smooth frame rates,that was on March 2006 the 360 was just 4 months old.

Yes it did bring pc the its knees. Oblivion ran better on 360 and even Bethesda said so. They made the game, I think they know more than you do and garbage gamespot. Second, Gears was far ahead of any pc game in technical graphics

compared to F.E.A.R the best pc graphics at that time (lol)


360 slaughtered pc in every way for until Crysis. Stop the denial and quit being fanboys. Just look at the pic. Fear was garbage to GEars and it was the best pc had

Half Life Lost Coast say Hi.

Half_life2_lost_coast.jpg

half-life_lost-coast.jpg

Avatar image for reach3
reach3

1600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#433 reach3
Member since 2012 • 1600 Posts

[QUOTE="reach3"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"] Oh please dude shut up the xbox 360 wasn't bringing anything to its knees,by early 2006 the 7900GTX even without HDR+AA enable was beating the 360. ""Oblivion looks better on a high-end PC than on the Xbox 360. Note the additional foliage visible in the background. We matched up resolutions for screenshot comparison purposes here, but a high-end PC with an AMD Athlon FX-60 CPU and GeForce 7900 GTX graphics card can enable all the settings and take resolutions up to 1600x1200 or more and still maintain smooth frame rates. We noticed that the Xbox 360 version had better antialiasing since our PC version couldn't enable HDR and antialiasing at the same time. Of course on the PC version, you can get rid of jaggies the old-fashioned way by jacking up the resolution."" http://www.gamespot.com/features/the-elder-scrolls-iv-oblivion-xbox-360-versus-pc-6147028/?page=2 The comparison was make by this own site. The 7900GTX could not even do HDR+AA at the same time,still beat the 360 version,and look what he say,they were matching the 360 version resolution,but the PC version could be crack up and still keep smooth frame rates,that was on March 2006 the 360 was just 4 months old.ronvalencia

Yes it did bring pc the its knees. Oblivion ran better on 360 and even Bethesda said so. They made the game, I think they know more than you do and garbage gamespot. Second, Gears was far ahead of any pc game in technical graphics

compared to F.E.A.R the best pc graphics at that time (lol)


360 slaughtered pc in every way for until Crysis. Stop the denial and quit being fanboys. Just look at the pic. Fear was garbage to GEars and it was the best pc had

Half Life Lost Coast say Hi.

Half_life2_lost_coast.jpg

half-life_lost-coast.jpg

um, that looks like garbage
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#434 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

[QUOTE="reach3"] Yes it did bring pc the its knees. Oblivion ran better on 360 and even Bethesda said so. They made the game, I think they know more than you do and garbage gamespot. Second, Gears was far ahead of any pc game in technical graphics

compared to F.E.A.R the best pc graphics at that time (lol)

360 slaughtered pc in every way for until Crysis. Stop the denial and quit being fanboys. Just look at the pic. Fear was garbage to GEars and it was the best pc had

reach3

Half Life Lost Coast say Hi.

Half_life2_lost_coast.jpg

um, that looks like garbage

gears-of-war-marcus-beautiful-architectu

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#435 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
Yes it did bring pc the its knees. Oblivion ran better on 360 and even Bethesda said so. They made the game, I think they know more than you do and garbage gamespot. Second, Gears was far ahead of any pc game in technical graphics

gears-of-war-marcus-beautiful-architectu

compared to F.E.A.R the best pc graphics at that time (lol)

fear3.jpg

360 slaughtered pc in every way for until Crysis. Stop the denial and quit being fanboys. Just look at the pic. Fear was garbage to GEars and it was the best pc had

reach3
No i will go by Gamespot and the screen they show with extra foliage. Gamespot even make it fare and lower the PC to 720p..lol They should have show screen of the PC version at 1600x1200.,. Oh please Gears of war was basically made on PC with 2 Nvidia 2 6800 ultras it was how it was show on E3 2005,and while they were salivating to how great it look the game was running on a PC...lol Epic's Gears of War looked awesome as well, but I asked Cliff Bleszinski what it was running on, and he admitted it was a PC with two GeForce 6800s in SLI. http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=20233 Shot up dude.. Even 2 old 6800 ran Gears of war..
Avatar image for reach3
reach3

1600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#436 reach3
Member since 2012 • 1600 Posts

[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

Half Life Lost Coast say Hi.

Half_life2_lost_coast.jpg

ronvalencia

um, that looks like garbage

gears-of-war-marcus-beautiful-architectu

Gears has far better technical graphics.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#437 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

[QUOTE="reach3"] um, that looks like garbagereach3

gears-of-war-marcus-beautiful-architectu

Gears has far better technical graphics.

Lots of bloom and motion blur really is technically better.
Avatar image for reach3
reach3

1600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#438 reach3
Member since 2012 • 1600 Posts
[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

gears-of-war-marcus-beautiful-architectu

Jebus213
Gears has far better technical graphics.

Lots of bloom and motion blur really is technically better.

Has better textures and polygon count, looks a gen ahead of them really
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#439 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="Jebus213"][QUOTE="reach3"] Gears has far better technical graphics.

Lots of bloom and motion blur really is technically better.

Has better textures and polygon count, looks a gen ahead of them really

Poly yes. But textures? Hell no... There's virtually no AF or AA applied. It looks like ass.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#440 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="reach3"] Has better textures and polygon count, looks a gen ahead of them really

Lots of jaggies and almost non existent lighting,a problem also present in Gears 2 as well,the lighting was poor.
Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#441 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts
Gears on Xbox 360.  Gears on PC.
Avatar image for reach3
reach3

1600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#442 reach3
Member since 2012 • 1600 Posts
[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="reach3"] Has better textures and polygon count, looks a gen ahead of them really

Lots of jaggies and almost non existent lighting,a problem also present in Gears 2 as well,the lighting was poor.

fear looks like a ps2 game with its awful poly count. Gears lighting is far better than any pc at the time as well. and yes, the textures are a whole heap better than fear.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#443 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="reach3"] Has better textures and polygon count, looks a gen ahead of them really

Lots of jaggies and almost non existent lighting,a problem also present in Gears 2 as well,the lighting was poor.

fear looks like a ps2 game with its awful poly count. Gears lighting is far better than any pc at the time as well. and yes, the textures are a whole heap better than fear.

FEAR doesn't look like a PS2 game... That screen shot of Gears looks overall worst then that pic of FEAR. CoD2 on PC looks better then that mess.
Avatar image for reach3
reach3

1600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#444 reach3
Member since 2012 • 1600 Posts
[QUOTE="Jebus213"][QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="tormentos"] Lots of jaggies and almost non existent lighting,a problem also present in Gears 2 as well,the lighting was poor.

fear looks like a ps2 game with its awful poly count. Gears lighting is far better than any pc at the time as well. and yes, the textures are a whole heap better than fear.

FEAR doesn't look like a PS2 game... That screen shot of Gears looks overall worst then that pic of FEAR. CoD2 on PC looks better then that mess.

well if you take your fanboy goggles off you would change your mind. COD 2? lol. that basically proved you arent being serious
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#445 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="reach3"] well if you take your fanboy goggles off you would change your mind. COD 2? lol. that basically proved you arent being serious

We do that when you take your pair first..
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#446 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="Jebus213"][QUOTE="reach3"] fear looks like a ps2 game with its awful poly count. Gears lighting is far better than any pc at the time as well. and yes, the textures are a whole heap better than fear.

FEAR doesn't look like a PS2 game... That screen shot of Gears looks overall worst then that pic of FEAR. CoD2 on PC looks better then that mess.

well if you take your fanboy goggles off you would change your mind. COD 2? lol. that basically proved you arent being serious

Well I mean if you think jagged edges and blurry textures look better... I'll go ahead and so almost game on PC looks better then that pic of gears.
Avatar image for reach3
reach3

1600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#447 reach3
Member since 2012 • 1600 Posts
[QUOTE="RyviusARC"]Gears on Xbox 360.  Gears on PC.

and gears PC came out same time as crysis, so irrelevant. point still stands, 360 lasted years until being matched what dont you understand?
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#448 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
[QUOTE="reach3"] and gears PC came out same time as crysis, so irrelevant. point still stands, 360 lasted years until being matched what dont you understand?

So how does one year make a big difference? I'd really like to know. Crysis and Gear1 on PC where released around the same time. But Crysis looks better by miles.
Avatar image for reach3
reach3

1600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#450 reach3
Member since 2012 • 1600 Posts
[QUOTE="Jebus213"][QUOTE="reach3"] and gears PC came out same time as crysis, so irrelevant. point still stands, 360 lasted years until being matched what dont you understand?

So how does one year make a big difference? I'd really like to know. Crysis and Gear1 on PC where released around the same time. But Crysis looks better by miles.

360 released in 2005 and crysis came late 2007. Years.