PC vs console graphics - PC always wins?

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"]

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

Hmm no. That wasn't me either.

TheSterls

No its pretty much 5 people and whats funny is you jump into the middle of arguments on a regluar basis and only pick and choose what ones to join. So if a rabbid hermit says something that even you dont agree with you stay out of it yet you will jump into another argument and your 2 cents .

You can't accept being wrong and twist everything in your favor. What's your point? He had nothing to say until he did. what's wrong with that?

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

You clearly say YOURSELF that no Action/Adventure game on PC looks as good as GoW3.

I show you Just Cause 2 which is CLEARLY an Action/Adventure genre by GAMESPOT classification.

And then you try to manipulate things by trying to say "Oh but Just Cause 2 ain't really a game like GoW3 blablabla".

Doesn't matter. YOU are the one who said GoW3 owns any Action/Adventure genre on PC and I showed how you were wrong with JC2.

Now take it like a man and freaking admit your defeat instead of trying to manipulate things.

Eggimannd

No because you are comparing games that cant even visually be compared. GOW3 has better characer models , GOW3 has better animations. JC2 has much larger detailed enviorments. You are comparing apples to oranges and making a visual comparison between 2 games that have strenghts in diffrent areas.

Overall JC2 is a better technically looking game than GoW3 and that's all that matters when arguing about graphics in System Wars: TECHNICAL graphics.

So once again. You fail and try to run away from admitting defeat.

Look you set yourself up. Made a mistake maybe. All that matters is that you stated "Gow3 stomps any action/adventure game on PC". I proved you wrong by pointing out JC2 which is a action/adventure game and is a overall superior graphical game.

Seriously why the hell can't you admit you're wrong here when you clearly are?

Um no its not that depends what you like. You can spin it whatever way you want but because visually there nearly imossible to compare and you are bringing up two games that are in diffrent sub-genres with completley diffrent visual styles.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"] lmfao... He's so full of it its disgusting.

ChubbyGuy40

No its pretty much 5 people and whats funny is you jump into the middle of arguments on a regluar basis and only pick and choose what ones to join. So if a rabbid hermit says something that even you dont agree with you stay out of it yet you will jump into another argument and your 2 cents .

You can't accept being wrong and twist everything in your favor. What's your point? He had nothing to say until he did. what's wrong with that?

Jumping into arguments and moviing away from the orginal point ? Theres nothing wrong with that?

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

Overall JC2 is a better technically looking game than GoW3 and that's all that matters when arguing about graphics in System Wars: TECHNICAL graphics.

So once again. You fail and try to run away from admitting defeat.

Look you set yourself up. Made a mistake maybe. All that matters is that you stated "Gow3 stomps any action/adventure game on PC". I proved you wrong by pointing out JC2 which is a action/adventure game and is a overall superior graphical game.

Seriously why the hell can't you admit you're wrong here when you clearly are?

TheSterls

Um no its not that depends what you like. You can spin it whatever way you want but because visually there nearly imossible to compare and you are bringing up two games that are in diffrent sub-genres with completley diffrent visual styles.

So basically you are telling us you choose a game that has no direct equivalent on PC just for the purpose of owning someone....................:|

The most recent BEMUP/Hack and Slash on PC I can think about is DMC4.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

Overall JC2 is a better technically looking game than GoW3 and that's all that matters when arguing about graphics in System Wars: TECHNICAL graphics.

So once again. You fail and try to run away from admitting defeat.

Look you set yourself up. Made a mistake maybe. All that matters is that you stated "Gow3 stomps any action/adventure game on PC". I proved you wrong by pointing out JC2 which is a action/adventure game and is a overall superior graphical game.

Seriously why the hell can't you admit you're wrong here when you clearly are?

glez13

Um no its not that depends what you like. You can spin it whatever way you want but because visually there nearly imossible to compare and you are bringing up two games that are in diffrent sub-genres with completley diffrent visual styles.

So basically you are telling us you choose a game that has no direct equivalent on PC just for the purpose of owning someone....................:|

The most recent BEMUP/Hack and Slash on PC I can think about is DMC4.

Yep that would probably be it , and no DMC4 on the pc doenst look as good as GOW3 yes the res will be higher and the fps will be faster but the assets are not as high. Those games have slimlar styles same gerne and are directly compareable. Jc2 is comapareble to the likes of RDR, AC2, GTA4 and mafia 2.

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

No its pretty much 5 people and whats funny is you jump into the middle of arguments on a regluar basis and only pick and choose what ones to join. So if a rabbid hermit says something that even you dont agree with you stay out of it yet you will jump into another argument and your 2 cents .

You can't accept being wrong and twist everything in your favor. What's your point? He had nothing to say until he did. what's wrong with that?

Jumping into arguments and moviing away from the orginal point ? Theres nothing wrong with that?

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

You can't accept being wrong and twist everything in your favor. What's your point? He had nothing to say until he did. what's wrong with that?

NVIDIATI

Jumping into arguments and moviing away from the orginal point ? Theres nothing wrong with that?

:|

You yourself said oled would be far superior then plasma in a previous thread are you gonna deny that?

I find these threads hilarious, especially the ones where the console user (or in most cases, just troll) continue to defend despite the overwhelming evidence.

I'm afraid that yes, a PC which does cost more and has much newer hardware in it WILL have better graphics, i would say only the gamplay (or story) is debatable between consoles and PC

Console kids mad they dont have a REAL gaming PC?

PC version graphics ALWAYS look better than the console versions. FACT and /thread.

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

No because you are comparing games that cant even visually be compared. GOW3 has better characer models , GOW3 has better animations. JC2 has much larger detailed enviorments. You are comparing apples to oranges and making a visual comparison between 2 games that have strenghts in diffrent areas.

TheSterls

Overall JC2 is a better technically looking game than GoW3 and that's all that matters when arguing about graphics in System Wars: TECHNICAL graphics.

So once again. You fail and try to run away from admitting defeat.

Look you set yourself up. Made a mistake maybe. All that matters is that you stated "Gow3 stomps any action/adventure game on PC". I proved you wrong by pointing out JC2 which is a action/adventure game and is a overall superior graphical game.

Seriously why the hell can't you admit you're wrong here when you clearly are?

Um no its not that depends what you like. You can spin it whatever way you want but because visually there nearly imossible to compare and you are bringing up two games that are in diffrent sub-genres with completley diffrent visual styles.

It's no use. You're clearly wrong yet you don't want to admit it. They're COMPLETELY comparable and Just Cause 2 has better overall technical graphics no matter what way you look at it.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

Overall JC2 is a better technically looking game than GoW3 and that's all that matters when arguing about graphics in System Wars: TECHNICAL graphics.

So once again. You fail and try to run away from admitting defeat.

Look you set yourself up. Made a mistake maybe. All that matters is that you stated "Gow3 stomps any action/adventure game on PC". I proved you wrong by pointing out JC2 which is a action/adventure game and is a overall superior graphical game.

Seriously why the hell can't you admit you're wrong here when you clearly are?

Eggimannd

Um no its not that depends what you like. You can spin it whatever way you want but because visually there nearly imossible to compare and you are bringing up two games that are in diffrent sub-genres with completley diffrent visual styles.

It's no use. You're clearly wrong yet you don't want to admit it. They're COMPLETELY comparable and Just Cause 2 has better overall technical graphics no matter what way you look at it.

There about as compareable as SSF4 to SC2 :|

GOW3 has better characer models, better animations , more characters on screen at a time , better particle effects . So how are they compareable when GOW3 beats it in certain areas where it was designed to look good in that way.

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Um no its not that depends what you like. You can spin it whatever way you want but because visually there nearly imossible to compare and you are bringing up two games that are in diffrent sub-genres with completley diffrent visual styles.

TheSterls

It's no use. You're clearly wrong yet you don't want to admit it. They're COMPLETELY comparable and Just Cause 2 has better overall technical graphics no matter what way you look at it.

There about as compareable as SSF4 to SC2 :|

GOW3 has better characer models, better animations , more characters on screen at a time , better particle effects . So how are they compareable when GOW3 beats it in certain areas where it was designed to look good in that way.

No, it's totally 100% comparable. They're both action adventure games. Comparing SSF4 to SC2? Oh please, you've lost it. That's comparing a fighting game to an RTS. That's not even comparable visual wise, especially since they have vastly different art styles.

GoW3 is good by console standards. It's way behind by PC standards. Just Cause 2 beats it in all the areas you've listed.

I'm afraid that yes, a PC which does cost more and has much newer hardware in it WILL have better graphics, i would say only the gamplay (or story) is debatable between consoles and PCwillx10121013

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

It's no use. You're clearly wrong yet you don't want to admit it. They're COMPLETELY comparable and Just Cause 2 has better overall technical graphics no matter what way you look at it.

ChubbyGuy40

There about as compareable as SSF4 to SC2 :|

GOW3 has better characer models, better animations , more characters on screen at a time , better particle effects . So how are they compareable when GOW3 beats it in certain areas where it was designed to look good in that way.

No, it's totally 100% comparable. They're both action adventure games. Comparing SSF4 to SC2? Oh please, you've lost it. That's comparing a fighting game to an RTS. That's not even comparable visual wise, especially since they have vastly different art styles.

GoW3 is good by console standards. It's way behind by PC standards. Just Cause 2 beats it in all the areas you've listed.

LMAO really? JC2 has better character models and animations ? Theres over 50 enemies on screen at a time on JC2? LOL

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"][QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Jumping into arguments and moviing away from the orginal point ? Theres nothing wrong with that?

:|

TheSterls

You yourself said oled would be far superior then plasma in a previous thread are you gonna deny that?

To the TC, Mafia II on PC is way better visually than Uncharted 2.

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Yet GOW3 stomps any game on pc in the actionaadventure genre, The games go for2 diffrent looks and the Char modles in GOW along with the animations blow MF2 out of the water. Only thing MF2 has going for it is scale. Lets compare a fighting game to a RTS next lmao.

TheSterls

Oh really?

JC2 is a sandbox title , along the tlines of GTA4 and AC. its not a hack and slah AV yet 2 totally diffrent genres.

You asked for action/adventure games on the PC. People come up with it. Then you say they are not comparable because it's not a "hack and slah". Yet you yourself stated "game on PC in the action-adventure genre". Filp-flop. Flip-flop.

Not to mention Just Cause 2 have special nVidia CUDA effects that GOW3 can only dream of:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A29uSkIo04s

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

Oh really?

Xtasy26

JC2 is a sandbox title , along the tlines of GTA4 and AC. its not a hack and slah AV yet 2 totally diffrent genres.

You asked for action/adventure games on the PC. People come up with it. Then you say they are not comparable because it's not a "hack and slah". Yet you yourself stated "game on PC in the action-adventure genre". Filp-flop. Flip-flop.

He just wants to avoid being debunked by adding more specifics to his previous statement.

To the TC, Mafia II on PC is way better visually than Uncharted 2.

Mystic-G

Agreed. Mafia 2 is stunning, and I've only played the demo! :P It's the artstyle.. it's effing gorgous.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

Oh really?

Xtasy26

JC2 is a sandbox title , along the tlines of GTA4 and AC. its not a hack and slah AV yet 2 totally diffrent genres.

You asked for action/adventure games on the PC. People come up with it. Then you say they are not comparable because it's not a "hack and slah". Yet you yourself stated "game on PC in the action-adventure genre". Filp-flop. Flip-flop.

He expects a game set in Greek Mythology where the main character is half naked, bald and has chains wrapped around his wrists, for a fair comparison. :roll: You can't win with him.

[QUOTE="Xtasy26"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

JC2 is a sandbox title , along the tlines of GTA4 and AC. its not a hack and slah AV yet 2 totally diffrent genres.

WhenCicadasCry

You asked for action/adventure games on the PC. People come up with it. Then you say they are not comparable because it's not a "hack and slah". Yet you yourself stated "game on PC in the action-adventure genre". Filp-flop. Flip-flop.

He expects a game set in Greek Mythology where the main character is half naked, bald and has chains wrapped around his wrists, for a fair comparison. :roll: You can't win with him.

LOL. :) In other words if it's not like GOW3 then it's not an "action-adventure game". I guess everygame has to be like GOW3 "hack and slah" to be classified as "action-adventure". Troll Epic Fail.

[QUOTE="Xtasy26"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

JC2 is a sandbox title , along the tlines of GTA4 and AC. its not a hack and slah AV yet 2 totally diffrent genres.

WhenCicadasCry

You asked for action/adventure games on the PC. People come up with it. Then you say they are not comparable because it's not a "hack and slah". Yet you yourself stated "game on PC in the action-adventure genre". Filp-flop. Flip-flop.

He expects a game set in Greek Mythology where the main character is half naked, bald and has chains wrapped around his wrists, for a fair comparison. :roll: You can't win with him.

Is DMC4 a action adventure game what aboutNG? What about Bayonetta? The Belmont clan from castlevania? WTF are you trolls talking about and why dont you stay on topic. Visually the char models in JC2 dont hold a candle to GOW3 on a techincal level that is what his claim was and widley apparent by screenshots that hes dead wrong. So what does the myhology of the character and what hes wearing have anything to do with the conversation?

Not at all. Despite the PC's hardware superiority, that didn't prevent consoles from giving the PC a run for its money quite some times. Examples: Super Mario 64 was the first 3D accelerated game for home systems, Soul Calibur was the best-looking fighter in 1999 by far, Halo was the first FPS with pixel shaded effects, Gears of War was the first TPS with the Unreal Engine 3, the cars in Gran Turismo 3 and 5 Prologue looked the best in their time (even if some other racers might have had more detailed cars technically speaking), Uncharted 2 is hands-down the best-looking third-person action adventure and I could go on. So PC graphics = always superior = not true.nameless12345

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

[QUOTE="Xtasy26"]

You asked for action/adventure games on the PC. People come up with it. Then you say they are not comparable because it's not a "hack and slah". Yet you yourself stated "game on PC in the action-adventure genre". Filp-flop. Flip-flop.

TheSterls

He expects a game set in Greek Mythology where the main character is half naked, bald and has chains wrapped around his wrists, for a fair comparison. :roll: You can't win with him.

Is Dante bald hero ? What about Bayonetta? The Belmont clan from castlevania? WTF are you trolls talking about and why dont you stay on topic. Visually the char models in JC2 dont hold a candle to GOW3 on a techincal level that is what his claim was and widley apparent by screenshots that hes dead wrong. So what does the myhology of the character and what hes wearing have anything to do with the conversation?

The hack and slash genre is dead dude. It's not our fault that we don't have any of those games on the PC. :|

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"] There you go spinning **** up again. The last time I recall jumping into an arguement was when some people has mixed up OLED and LED backlight. Shortly after that you made such claims that OLED is vastly better than Plasma or LCD, which I proved wrong wiht the review of the only OLED on the market the XEL-1. You ignored my post and also ignored it 2 or 3 more times when it was bumped by other users.NVIDIATI

You yourself said oled would be far superior then plasma in a previous thread are you gonna deny that?

I didnt spin crap you just jumped into a conversation with absolutely no knowledge of what it was about. The arguemnt was that xtasy thought the naked eye has no limits to the resolution it can see . I said if res beyond 1080p is so importatn then why are the next gen of tv's( which will be oled) not even focusing on res ? Way to jump into a argument with 0 relative points.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

He expects a game set in Greek Mythology where the main character is half naked, bald and has chains wrapped around his wrists, for a fair comparison. :roll: You can't win with him.

WhenCicadasCry

Is Dante bald hero ? What about Bayonetta? The Belmont clan from castlevania? WTF are you trolls talking about and why dont you stay on topic. Visually the char models in JC2 dont hold a candle to GOW3 on a techincal level that is what his claim was and widley apparent by screenshots that hes dead wrong. So what does the myhology of the character and what hes wearing have anything to do with the conversation?

The hack and slash genre is dead dude. It's not our fault that we don't have any of those games on the PC. :|

Dead? Really? GOW3 selling over 4 million , DMC4 has sold over 4 million both NGS and NG2 have sold millions , Bayonetta was considered a sucess and now Castlevania: LOS is coming out . No its dead on pc or should i say it was never alive to begin with on consoles its a widley succesful genre.

Regardless we are getting off topic again and you are doing the typical hermit BS and gradually moving off topic . He argued that JC2 looked better in all areas and i just proved him wrong. Do you think JC2 has better character models then GOW3? LMAO?

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Is Dante bald hero ? What about Bayonetta? The Belmont clan from castlevania? WTF are you trolls talking about and why dont you stay on topic. Visually the char models in JC2 dont hold a candle to GOW3 on a techincal level that is what his claim was and widley apparent by screenshots that hes dead wrong. So what does the myhology of the character and what hes wearing have anything to do with the conversation?

TheSterls

The hack and slash genre is dead dude. It's not our fault that we don't have any of those games on the PC. :|

Dead? Really? GOW3 selling over 4 million , DMC4 has sold over 4 million both NGS and NG2 have sold millions , Bayonetta was considered a sucess and now Castlevania: LOS is coming out . No its dead on pc or should i say it was never alive to begin with on consoles its a widley succesful genre.

Regardless we are getting off topic again and you are doing the typical hermit BS and moving gradually moving away from it. He argued that JC2 looked better in all areas and i just proved him wrong. Do you think JC2 has better character models then GOW3? LMAO?

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Is Dante bald hero ? What about Bayonetta? The Belmont clan from castlevania? WTF are you trolls talking about and why dont you stay on topic. Visually the char models in JC2 dont hold a candle to GOW3 on a techincal level that is what his claim was and widley apparent by screenshots that hes dead wrong. So what does the myhology of the character and what hes wearing have anything to do with the conversation?

TheSterls

The hack and slash genre is dead dude. It's not our fault that we don't have any of those games on the PC. :|

Dead? Really? GOW3 selling over 4 million , DMC4 has sold over 4 million both NGS and NG2 have sold millions , Bayonetta was considered a sucess and now Castlevania: LOS is coming out . No its dead on pc or should i say it was never alive to begin with on consoles its a widley succesful genre.

Regardless we are getting off topic again and you are doing the typical hermit BS and gradually moving off topic . He argued that JC2 looked better in all areas and i just proved him wrong. Do you think JC2 has better character models then GOW3? LMAO?

4 franchises, woopdidoo. The simple fact is, Just Cause 2 is an action adventure, just like Uncharted 2, and God Of War 3, and it's technically more advanced then them, unless they have Cuda support? :?

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

The hack and slash genre is dead dude. It's not our fault that we don't have any of those games on the PC. :|

WhenCicadasCry

Dead? Really? GOW3 selling over 4 million , DMC4 has sold over 4 million both NGS and NG2 have sold millions , Bayonetta was considered a sucess and now Castlevania: LOS is coming out . No its dead on pc or should i say it was never alive to begin with on consoles its a widley succesful genre.

Regardless we are getting off topic again and you are doing the typical hermit BS and gradually moving off topic . He argued that JC2 looked better in all areas and i just proved him wrong. Do you think JC2 has better character models then GOW3? LMAO?

4 franchises, woopdidoo. The simple fact is, Just Cause 2 is an action adventure, just like Uncharted 2, and God Of War 3, and it's technically more advanced then them, unless they have Cuda support? :?

Why are you dodging the question? JC2 has cuda suppor its more impressive blah blah WHAT? Its not more impressve in all ways charcter design and animations being 2 areas GOW3 romps JC2 but at the end of the day you are comaring a game with linear design to one with open world thus making them hard to compare .

He said it looked better ina ll areas and you are still doging the question why is it so hard for you answer you think JC2 tehnically has better looking character models then GOW3 its very simple yes or no answer:|

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

The hack and slash genre is dead dude. It's not our fault that we don't have any of those games on the PC. :|

Mystic-G

Dead? Really? GOW3 selling over 4 million , DMC4 has sold over 4 million both NGS and NG2 have sold millions , Bayonetta was considered a sucess and now Castlevania: LOS is coming out . No its dead on pc or should i say it was never alive to begin with on consoles its a widley succesful genre.

Regardless we are getting off topic again and you are doing the typical hermit BS and moving gradually moving away from it. He argued that JC2 looked better in all areas and i just proved him wrong. Do you think JC2 has better character models then GOW3? LMAO?

GOW 3 romps mafia 2's char models .

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"][QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Dead? Really? GOW3 selling over 4 million , DMC4 has sold over 4 million both NGS and NG2 have sold millions , Bayonetta was considered a sucess and now Castlevania: LOS is coming out . No its dead on pc or should i say it was never alive to begin with on consoles its a widley succesful genre.

Regardless we are getting off topic again and you are doing the typical hermit BS and moving gradually moving away from it. He argued that JC2 looked better in all areas and i just proved him wrong. Do you think JC2 has better character models then GOW3? LMAO?

TheSterls

GOW 3 romps mafia 2's char models .

No, no it doesn't. Kratos does not look as good as you think he does.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"] Did you not see my post about Mafia II on PC? Oh please let me know if GoW3's character models are better. ChubbyGuy40

GOW 3 romps mafia 2's char models .

No, no it doesn't. Kratos does not look as good as you think he does.

Ive beat the game 3 times please tell me how he doesnt look as good as i think he does? LMAO

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Dead? Really? GOW3 selling over 4 million , DMC4 has sold over 4 million both NGS and NG2 have sold millions , Bayonetta was considered a sucess and now Castlevania: LOS is coming out . No its dead on pc or should i say it was never alive to begin with on consoles its a widley succesful genre.

Regardless we are getting off topic again and you are doing the typical hermit BS and gradually moving off topic . He argued that JC2 looked better in all areas and i just proved him wrong. Do you think JC2 has better character models then GOW3? LMAO?

TheSterls

4 franchises, woopdidoo. The simple fact is, Just Cause 2 is an action adventure, just like Uncharted 2, and God Of War 3, and it's technically more advanced then them, unless they have Cuda support? :?

Why are you dodging the question? JC2 has cuda suppor its more impressive blah blah WHAT? Its not more impressve in all ways charcter design and animations being 2 areas GOW3 romps JC2 but at the end of the day you are comaring a game with linear design to one with open world thus making them hard to compare .

He said it looked better ina ll areas and you are still doging the question why is it so hard for you answer you think JC2 tehnically has better looking character models then GOW3 its very simple yes or no answer:|

.... You're comparing a game that uses effectively OpenGL 1.5 / DX9, to a game that uses DX11 and Cuda support. Until I see the PS3 run Just Cause 2 maxed out 1080p 8xAA 16xAF with DX11 and Cuda support, there's no point even carrying on this discussion.

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

You yourself said oled would be far superior then plasma in a previous thread are you gonna deny that?

TheSterls

I didnt spin crap you just jumped into a conversation with absolutely no knowledge of what it was about. The arguemnt was that xtasy thought the naked eye has no limits to the resolution it can see . I said if res beyond 1080p is so importatn then why are the next gen of tv's( which will be oled) not even focusing on res ? Way to jump into a argument with 0 relative points.

You were claiming OLED 1080P would look better than Eyefinity, which has over 11+ million pixels than 1080P. So fail.TVs in the futurewill have over 1080P, so you think we are going to be stuck with 1080P forever, lol?

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"][QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Dead? Really? GOW3 selling over 4 million , DMC4 has sold over 4 million both NGS and NG2 have sold millions , Bayonetta was considered a sucess and now Castlevania: LOS is coming out . No its dead on pc or should i say it was never alive to begin with on consoles its a widley succesful genre.

Regardless we are getting off topic again and you are doing the typical hermit BS and moving gradually moving away from it. He argued that JC2 looked better in all areas and i just proved him wrong. Do you think JC2 has better character models then GOW3? LMAO?

TheSterls

GOW 3 romps mafia 2's char models .

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"] You said before that "Yep OLED is only avaiable in 11 inches now and the screens are like 2000$ there is nothing in the same league as OLED" and this "The picture quality is vast over any current plasma or lcd" This is what I said... " I'm sure as the technology develops in the future it will improve a lot but for now its a work in progress." Way to spin things again...

Xtasy26

I didnt spin crap you just jumped into a conversation with absolutely no knowledge of what it was about. The arguemnt was that xtasy thought the naked eye has no limits to the resolution it can see . I said if res beyond 1080p is so importatn then why are the next gen of tv's( which will be oled) not even focusing on res ? Way to jump into a argument with 0 relative points.

You were claiming OLED 1080P would look better than Eyefinity, which has over 11+ million pixels than 1080P. So fail.TVs in the futurewill have over 1080P, so you think we are going to be stuck with 1080P forever, lol?

Didn't he say the eye can't see any difference past 1080p? :lol:

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"] You said before that "Yep OLED is only avaiable in 11 inches now and the screens are like 2000$ there is nothing in the same league as OLED" and this "The picture quality is vast over any current plasma or lcd" This is what I said... " I'm sure as the technology develops in the future it will improve a lot but for now its a work in progress." Way to spin things again...

Xtasy26

I didnt spin crap you just jumped into a conversation with absolutely no knowledge of what it was about. The arguemnt was that xtasy thought the naked eye has no limits to the resolution it can see . I said if res beyond 1080p is so importatn then why are the next gen of tv's( which will be oled) not even focusing on res ? Way to jump into a argument with 0 relative points.

You were claiming OLED 1080P would look better than Eyefinity, which has over 11+ million pixels than 1080P. So fail.TVs in the futurewill have over 1080P, so you think we are going to be stuck with 1080P forever, lol?

Im not sure how long they will stay with 1080p but currently there are no plans of making oled beyond 1080p and thats over the next 2 years. eye infigity on 3 inferior monitors isnt going to look better then one screen with a better picture unless the screen is MASSIVE .

[QUOTE="Xtasy26"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

I didnt spin crap you just jumped into a conversation with absolutely no knowledge of what it was about. The arguemnt was that xtasy thought the naked eye has no limits to the resolution it can see . I said if res beyond 1080p is so importatn then why are the next gen of tv's( which will be oled) not even focusing on res ? Way to jump into a argument with 0 relative points.

WhenCicadasCry

You were claiming OLED 1080P would look better than Eyefinity, which has over 11+ million pixels than 1080P. So fail.TVs in the futurewill have over 1080P, so you think we are going to be stuck with 1080P forever, lol?

Didn't he say the eye can't see any difference past 1080p? :lol:

He did. And Mafia 2 looks better than I thought.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn6kF19BWJE

[QUOTE="Xtasy26"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

I didnt spin crap you just jumped into a conversation with absolutely no knowledge of what it was about. The arguemnt was that xtasy thought the naked eye has no limits to the resolution it can see . I said if res beyond 1080p is so importatn then why are the next gen of tv's( which will be oled) not even focusing on res ? Way to jump into a argument with 0 relative points.

WhenCicadasCry

You were claiming OLED 1080P would look better than Eyefinity, which has over 11+ million pixels than 1080P. So fail.TVs in the futurewill have over 1080P, so you think we are going to be stuck with 1080P forever, lol?

Didn't he say the eye can't see any difference past 1080p? :lol:

nope I said it would be hard to on a certain tv size and that is the truth.

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

[QUOTE="Xtasy26"]

You asked for action/adventure games on the PC. People come up with it. Then you say they are not comparable because it's not a "hack and slah". Yet you yourself stated "game on PC in the action-adventure genre". Filp-flop. Flip-flop.

TheSterls

He expects a game set in Greek Mythology where the main character is half naked, bald and has chains wrapped around his wrists, for a fair comparison. :roll: You can't win with him.

Is DMC4 a action adventure game what aboutNG? What about Bayonetta? The Belmont clan from castlevania? WTF are you trolls talking about and why dont you stay on topic. Visually the char models in JC2 dont hold a candle to GOW3 on a techincal level that is what his claim was and widley apparent by screenshots that hes dead wrong. So what does the myhology of the character and what hes wearing have anything to do with the conversation?

Fact:

GOW 3- Action Adventure game.

Mafia II-Action Adventure game.

JC2 - Action Adventure game.

You asked as to come up with action adventure games on the PC we did. Then you started changing the topic, fail.

Yeah, nVidia special CUDA effects will make the game look better than GOW3. So fail.

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

[QUOTE="Xtasy26"]

You were claiming OLED 1080P would look better than Eyefinity, which has over 11+ million pixels than 1080P. So fail.TVs in the futurewill have over 1080P, so you think we are going to be stuck with 1080P forever, lol?

ChubbyGuy40

Didn't he say the eye can't see any difference past 1080p? :lol:

He did. And Mafia 2 looks better than I thought.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn6kF19BWJE

thats a lie :|

[QUOTE="Xtasy26"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

I didnt spin crap you just jumped into a conversation with absolutely no knowledge of what it was about. The arguemnt was that xtasy thought the naked eye has no limits to the resolution it can see . I said if res beyond 1080p is so importatn then why are the next gen of tv's( which will be oled) not even focusing on res ? Way to jump into a argument with 0 relative points.

TheSterls

You were claiming OLED 1080P would look better than Eyefinity, which has over 11+ million pixels than 1080P. So fail.TVs in the futurewill have over 1080P, so you think we are going to be stuck with 1080P forever, lol?

Im not sure how long they will stay with 1080p but currently there are no plans of making oled beyond 1080p and thats over the next 2 years. eye infigity on 3 inferior monitors isnt going to look better then one screen with a better picture unless the screen is MASSIVE .

It's gonna have more detail. The difference isn't worth talking about, since OLED isn't the greatest looking display. Someone already pointed that out that it isn't all its cracked up to be, at least not yet.

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

Didn't he say the eye can't see any difference past 1080p? :lol:

TheSterls

He did. And Mafia 2 looks better than I thought.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn6kF19BWJE

thats a lie :|

Your right. It looks even better in person.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"] Did you not see my post about Mafia II on PC? Oh please let me know if GoW3's character models are better. Mystic-G

GOW 3 romps mafia 2's char models .

Yea im sure i do post pics :|

i don't see how this topic should even validate for an argument.

maybe it's out there somewhere, but as far as my experience goes w/ pc gaming,

i have yet to play a multiplat game that shows any console dominating PC graphically.

[QUOTE="Xtasy26"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

I didnt spin crap you just jumped into a conversation with absolutely no knowledge of what it was about. The arguemnt was that xtasy thought the naked eye has no limits to the resolution it can see . I said if res beyond 1080p is so importatn then why are the next gen of tv's( which will be oled) not even focusing on res ? Way to jump into a argument with 0 relative points.

TheSterls

You were claiming OLED 1080P would look better than Eyefinity, which has over 11+ million pixels than 1080P. So fail.TVs in the futurewill have over 1080P, so you think we are going to be stuck with 1080P forever, lol?

Im not sure how long they will stay with 1080p but currently there are no plans of making oled beyond 1080p and thats over the next 2 years. eye infigity on 3 inferior monitors isnt going to look better then one screen with a better picture unless the screen is MASSIVE .

Yeah it will look better. If you want massive we could go 3x3 30" Eyefinity setup.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

He expects a game set in Greek Mythology where the main character is half naked, bald and has chains wrapped around his wrists, for a fair comparison. :roll: You can't win with him.

Xtasy26

Is DMC4 a action adventure game what aboutNG? What about Bayonetta? The Belmont clan from castlevania? WTF are you trolls talking about and why dont you stay on topic. Visually the char models in JC2 dont hold a candle to GOW3 on a techincal level that is what his claim was and widley apparent by screenshots that hes dead wrong. So what does the myhology of the character and what hes wearing have anything to do with the conversation?

Fact:

GOW 3- Action Adventure game.

Mafia II-Action Adventure game.

JC2 - Action Adventure game.

You asked as to come up with action adventure games on the PC we did. Then you started changing the topic, fail.

Yeah, nVidia special CUDA effects will make the game look better than GOW3. So fail.

Um no it wont it cuda its not even compareable and you are arguign with me JC2 and Mafia 2 has better character models then GOW 3 thats beyond laughable.

[QUOTE="Xtasy26"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

I didnt spin crap you just jumped into a conversation with absolutely no knowledge of what it was about. The arguemnt was that xtasy thought the naked eye has no limits to the resolution it can see . I said if res beyond 1080p is so importatn then why are the next gen of tv's( which will be oled) not even focusing on res ? Way to jump into a argument with 0 relative points.

WhenCicadasCry

You were claiming OLED 1080P would look better than Eyefinity, which has over 11+ million pixels than 1080P. So fail.TVs in the futurewill have over 1080P, so you think we are going to be stuck with 1080P forever, lol?

Didn't he say the eye can't see any difference past 1080p? :lol:

Yeah he did. Just go back and look at his posts. We are used to all his "contradictions". :P

[QUOTE="Xtasy26"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Is DMC4 a action adventure game what aboutNG? What about Bayonetta? The Belmont clan from castlevania? WTF are you trolls talking about and why dont you stay on topic. Visually the char models in JC2 dont hold a candle to GOW3 on a techincal level that is what his claim was and widley apparent by screenshots that hes dead wrong. So what does the myhology of the character and what hes wearing have anything to do with the conversation?

TheSterls

Fact:

GOW 3- Action Adventure game.

Mafia II-Action Adventure game.

JC2 - Action Adventure game.

You asked as to come up with action adventure games on the PC we did. Then you started changing the topic, fail.

Yeah, nVidia special CUDA effects will make the game look better than GOW3. So fail.

Um no it wont it cuda its not even compareable and you are arguign with me JC2 and Mafia 2 has better character models then GOW 3 thats beyond laughable.

Besides Kratos, all the other characters aren't even impressive.