PC vs console graphics - PC always wins?

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"] You honestly think that metro 2003's lighting is nothing special while GoW3's lighting is amazing?ferret-gamer

I would consider it good for a high quality game putting it on the same level , why havent you answered my question HAVE YOU PLAYED THE GAME?

PS i can enlarge font too.

Metro 2033's lighting only has parity with STALKER and maybe Crysis 2, there is no other game that can touch it in lighting. No i have not "played" GoW3 i have watched my Buddy play it on a 46in samsung plasma. You however have quite obviously not played Metro 2033 on the PC at least on high/veryhigh settings if you think it is nothing special

Yea i have i have played it on DX10 though not on DX11 but how conveniant. Your buddy happens to have it :roll:

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

I would consider it good for a high quality game putting it on the same level , why havent you answered my question HAVE YOU PLAYED THE GAME?

TheSterls

PS i can enlarge font too.

Metro 2033's lighting only has parity with STALKER and maybe Crysis 2, there is no other game that can touch it in lighting. No i have not "played" GoW3 i have watched my Buddy play it on a 46in samsung plasma. You however have quite obviously not played Metro 2033 on the PC at least on high/veryhigh settings if you think it is nothing special

Yea i have i have played it on DX10 though not on DX11 but how conveniant. Your buddy happens to have it :roll:

Dude, God Of War 3 doesn't have better lighting then Stalker or Metro..... :?

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"] Thats the biggest load of BS EVER. You where talking with chubbyguy40... Just read what you said. You keep spining stuff more and more its so ****ing sad.

THIS is the convo. STOP SPING THE STORY AND SPREADING YOUR BS:

ChubbyGuy40

It has superior contrast raito and brightness you were blabbering about color . They will have the perfect in probably 2 years. So how him am I spnning anything troll?

Contrast ratio doesn't mean anything when it doesn't have good color saturation.

it said Saturation was superb .

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

PS i can enlarge font too.

Metro 2033's lighting only has parity with STALKER and maybe Crysis 2, there is no other game that can touch it in lighting. No i have not "played" GoW3 i have watched my Buddy play it on a 46in samsung plasma. You however have quite obviously not played Metro 2033 on the PC at least on high/veryhigh settings if you think it is nothing special

WhenCicadasCry

Yea i have i have played it on DX10 though not on DX11 but how conveniant. Your buddy happens to have it :roll:

Dude, God Of War 3 doesn't have better lighting then Stalker or Metro..... :?

You told me Cryotasis looked better then Uc2 with its lame graphic merrit :|

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

I would consider it good for a high quality game putting it on the same level , why havent you answered my question HAVE YOU PLAYED THE GAME?

TheSterls

PS i can enlarge font too.

Metro 2033's lighting only has parity with STALKER and maybe Crysis 2, there is no other game that can touch it in lighting. No i have not "played" GoW3 i have watched my Buddy play it on a 46in samsung plasma. You however have quite obviously not played Metro 2033 on the PC at least on high/veryhigh settings if you think it is nothing special

Yea i have i have played it on DX10 though not on DX11 but how conveniant. Your buddy happens to have it :roll:

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

I would consider it good for a high quality game putting it on the same level , why havent you answered my question HAVE YOU PLAYED THE GAME?

TheSterls

PS i can enlarge font too.

Metro 2033's lighting only has parity with STALKER and maybe Crysis 2, there is no other game that can touch it in lighting. No i have not "played" GoW3 i have watched my Buddy play it on a 46in samsung plasma. You however have quite obviously not played Metro 2033 on the PC at least on high/veryhigh settings if you think it is nothing special

Yea i have i have played it on DX10 though not on DX11 but how conveniant. Your buddy happens to have it :roll:

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Yea i have i have played it on DX10 though not on DX11 but how conveniant. Your buddy happens to have it :roll:

TheSterls

Dude, God Of War 3 doesn't have better lighting then Stalker or Metro..... :?

You told me Cryotasis looked better then Uc2 with its lame graphic merrit :|

BECAUSE OF IT'S PERFORMANCE. Did you even read the description of the merrit tag?

It's not a lame graphics merrit, it's a busted technical merrit. Meaning something with the game engine went wrong, either due to bugs or frame rate. or odd animation. For Cryostasis, it's engine was serverly unoptimized. Even my GTX 260 struggles to run it on DX10 with max settings.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

PS i can enlarge font too.

Metro 2033's lighting only has parity with STALKER and maybe Crysis 2, there is no other game that can touch it in lighting. No i have not "played" GoW3 i have watched my Buddy play it on a 46in samsung plasma. You however have quite obviously not played Metro 2033 on the PC at least on high/veryhigh settings if you think it is nothing special

ferret-gamer

Yea i have i have played it on DX10 though not on DX11 but how conveniant. Your buddy happens to have it :roll:

Yea I do have freinds in real life but we dont talk about video games sorry bro. You bash all these games and then go on to say well yea my buddy has it as thats proof you have played it . Its lighting is good but to claim its only on the level of 3 other pc games? Thats ridiculous and biast.

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"][QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Yea i have i have played it on DX10 though not on DX11 but how conveniant. Your buddy happens to have it :roll:

TheSterls

Yea I do have freinds in real life but we dont talk about video games sorry bro. You bash all these games and then go on to say well yea my buddy has it as thats proof you have played it . Its lighting is good but to claim its only on the level of 3 other pc games? Thats ridiculous and biast.

No, saying it's not is riduculous and biased, and far from the truth.

Please, at least name one title with better lighting.

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"][QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Yea i have i have played it on DX10 though not on DX11 but how conveniant. Your buddy happens to have it :roll:

TheSterls

Yea I do have freinds in real life but we dont talk about video games sorry bro. You bash all these games and then go on to say well yea my buddy has it as thats proof you have played it . Its lighting is good but to claim its only on the level of 3 other pc games? Thats ridiculous and biast.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

Dude, God Of War 3 doesn't have better lighting then Stalker or Metro..... :?

ChubbyGuy40

You told me Cryotasis looked better then Uc2 with its lame graphic merrit :|

BECAUSE OF IT'S PERFORMANCE. Did you even read the description of the merrit tag?

It's not a lame graphics merrit, it's a busted technical merrit. Meaning something with the game engine went wrong, either due to bugs or frame rate. or odd animation. For Cryostasis, it's engine was serverly unoptimized. Even my GTX 260 struggles to run it on DX10 with max settings.

And for its crappy blob textures and bad geometry.

"Textures are greatly lacking in detail, and some jagged edges and blocky geometry make Cryostasis look uneven"

right from the gamespot review.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"] You may not have friends in real life(or the internet for that matter), but that doesnt mean the rest of use dont. And im going to continue to say you havent played metro 2033 or you are just so blinded by fanboyism that you actually think its lighting engine is nothing special. ferret-gamer

Yea I do have freinds in real life but we dont talk about video games sorry bro. You bash all these games and then go on to say well yea my buddy has it as thats proof you have played it . Its lighting is good but to claim its only on the level of 3 other pc games? Thats ridiculous and biast.

Post me proof that cryostasis looks better then UC2? You cant post any proof of that at the end of the day its an opionion .

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"][QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Yea I do have freinds in real life but we dont talk about video games sorry bro. You bash all these games and then go on to say well yea my buddy has it as thats proof you have played it . Its lighting is good but to claim its only on the level of 3 other pc games? Thats ridiculous and biast.

TheSterls

Post me proof that cryostasis looks better then UC2? You cant post any proof of that at the end of the day its an opionion .

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Yes games on consoels use native resolution and you can set a game on pc to a native resolution as well. If hes running a console game that has native 720p and his monitor doesnt scale correclty he could have problems those are facts. Um I disagree about stalker

TheSterls

You seem to be fixated on character models. You don't praise Stalker because it has bad character models, you deny Just Cause superiority because of the character models... :? Stalker has twice as much envoirement detail then any console FPS, and it even beats Crysis in texture work. What the **** are you smoking?

Because chubby and eggman said it beat it in character models so if we cant even agree on what is obviously not true then whats the point? It has larger enviormental detail um yea its in a sandbox envioerment. GOW3 has better character models, better animations , more enemies on screen but none of that matters right?

And there you go again with your freaking BS. I have NEVER stated that JC2 beats GoW3 in character models. Quit pulling **** out of your ass. What I said was that JC2 is an OVERALL (I'm not sure you understand what this word means) superior graphical game than GoW3.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"] Why dont you name 3 games that are even comparable and post proof along with it instead of just saying it is as good.ferret-gamer

Post me proof that cryostasis looks better then UC2? You cant post any proof of that at the end of the day its an opionion .

You asked me to post proof of a game looking better. That will involve a screenshot war of you saying ' no that doesnt look as good ' regardless of what i post. And sorry im not sure if you were of the hermits that cme i here and told me cryotsasis looked better then UC2 im getting you mixed up at this point.

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

It has superior contrast raito and brightness you were blabbering about color . They will have the perfect in probably 2 years. So how him am I spnning anything troll?

TheSterls

Contrast ratio doesn't mean anything when it doesn't have good color saturation.

it said Saturation was superb .

Good enough for me: Cryostasis

It isnt the best looking game, but from a techonological view it is miles ahead of GOW3

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

You told me Cryotasis looked better then Uc2 with its lame graphic merrit :|

TheSterls

BECAUSE OF IT'S PERFORMANCE. Did you even read the description of the merrit tag?

It's not a lame graphics merrit, it's a busted technical merrit. Meaning something with the game engine went wrong, either due to bugs or frame rate. or odd animation. For Cryostasis, it's engine was serverly unoptimized. Even my GTX 260 struggles to run it on DX10 with max settings.

And for its crappy blob textures and bad geometry.

"Textures are greatly lacking in detail, and some jagged edges and blocky geometry make Cryostasis look uneven"

right from the gamespot review.

"Despite that, the graphics technology has a difficult time keeping up. The game is prone to major fits of slowdown, even on machines that greatly exceed its minimum requirements, which is a head-scratcher in a game that clearly doesn't push the limits of modern technology."

So that didn't influence their score. The only thing that looked bad, from videos and from what I've played of it so far, is this weird frost/cold/frozen texture I've seen in a few places. It looks like a giant pine needle thats frozen. It looks really odd and out of place.

Despite that, tech wise Cryostasis better than UC2. What saved UC2 was it's art design.

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"][QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Post me proof that cryostasis looks better then UC2? You cant post any proof of that at the end of the day its an opionion .

TheSterls

You asked me to post proof of a game looking better. That will involve a screenshot war of you saying ' no that doesnt look as good ' regardless of what i post. And sorry im not sure if you were of the hermits that cme i here and told me cryotsasis looked better then UC2 im getting you mixed up at this point.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

Overall JC2 is a better technically looking game than GoW3 and that's all that matters when arguing about graphics in System Wars: TECHNICAL graphics.

So once again. You fail and try to run away from admitting defeat.

Look you set yourself up. Made a mistake maybe. All that matters is that you stated "Gow3 stomps any action/adventure game on PC". I proved you wrong by pointing out JC2 which is a action/adventure game and is a overall superior graphical game.

Seriously why the hell can't you admit you're wrong here when you clearly are?

Eggimannd

Um no its not that depends what you like. You can spin it whatever way you want but because visually there nearly imossible to compare and you are bringing up two games that are in diffrent sub-genres with completley diffrent visual styles.

It's no use. You're clearly wrong yet you don't want to admit it. They're COMPLETELY comparable and Just Cause 2 has better overall technical graphics no matter what way you look at it.

If you look at the areas of charcter models , animations those are techincal parts of the visuals as well you said it looks better no matter how you look at it so dont go backtracking now.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

BECAUSE OF IT'S PERFORMANCE. Did you even read the description of the merrit tag?

It's not a lame graphics merrit, it's a busted technical merrit. Meaning something with the game engine went wrong, either due to bugs or frame rate. or odd animation. For Cryostasis, it's engine was serverly unoptimized. Even my GTX 260 struggles to run it on DX10 with max settings.

ChubbyGuy40

And for its crappy blob textures and bad geometry.

"Textures are greatly lacking in detail, and some jagged edges and blocky geometry make Cryostasis look uneven"

right from the gamespot review.

"Despite that, the graphics technology has a difficult time keeping up. The game is prone to major fits of slowdown, even on machines that greatly exceed its minimum requirements, which is a head-scratcher in a game that clearly doesn't push the limits of modern technology."

So that didn't influence their score. The only thing that looked bad, from videos and from what I've played of it so far, is this weird frost/cold/frozen texture I've seen in a few places. It looks like a giant pine needle thats frozen. It looks really odd and out of place.

Despite that, tech wise Cryostasis better than UC2. What saved UC2 was it's art design.

Why did you take out the quote that i listed which is clearly in the review? UNC2 an gow3 have no complaints about there techncial visuals nothing like that and no Crysostasis froma technical standpoint looks horrible. It uses low levels of geometry , uneven textures , runs like crap , has terrible animations , Im really not sure where you are getting off that it looks better technically but im tired of arguing with you guys have a good night.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

You seem to be fixated on character models. You don't praise Stalker because it has bad character models, you deny Just Cause superiority because of the character models... :? Stalker has twice as much envoirement detail then any console FPS, and it even beats Crysis in texture work. What the **** are you smoking?

Eggimannd

Because chubby and eggman said it beat it in character models so if we cant even agree on what is obviously not true then whats the point? It has larger enviormental detail um yea its in a sandbox envioerment. GOW3 has better character models, better animations , more enemies on screen but none of that matters right?

And there you go again with your freaking BS. I have NEVER stated that JC2 beats GoW3 in character models. Quit pulling **** out of your ass. What I said was that JC2 is an OVERALL (I'm not sure you understand what this word means) superior graphical game than GoW3.

But you forget. He didn't even want to acknowledge that JC2 is an action-adventure game. It's only those "hack and slah" games like GOW3. :P

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Um no its not that depends what you like. You can spin it whatever way you want but because visually there nearly imossible to compare and you are bringing up two games that are in diffrent sub-genres with completley diffrent visual styles.

TheSterls

It's no use. You're clearly wrong yet you don't want to admit it. They're COMPLETELY comparable and Just Cause 2 has better overall technical graphics no matter what way you look at it.

If you look at the areas of charcter models , animations those are techincal parts of the visuals as well you said it looks better no matter how you look at it so dont go backtracking now.

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Um no its not that depends what you like. You can spin it whatever way you want but because visually there nearly imossible to compare and you are bringing up two games that are in diffrent sub-genres with completley diffrent visual styles.

TheSterls

It's no use. You're clearly wrong yet you don't want to admit it. They're COMPLETELY comparable and Just Cause 2 has better overall technical graphics no matter what way you look at it.

If you look at the areas of charcter models , animations those are techincal parts of the visuals as well you said it looks better no matter how you look at it so dont go backtracking now.

Dude... I don't know if English is your primary language but do you even know the meaning of the word "overall"? It doesn't seem like you do.

Why did you take out the quote that i listed which is clearly in the review? UNC2 an gow3 have no complaints about there techncial visuals nothing like that and no Crysostasis froma technical standpoint looks horrible. It uses low levels of geometry , uneven textures , runs like crap , has terrible animations , Im really not sure where you are getting off that it looks better technically but im tired of arguing with you guys have a good night.TheSterls

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Because chubby and eggman said it beat it in character models so if we cant even agree on what is obviously not true then whats the point? It has larger enviormental detail um yea its in a sandbox envioerment. GOW3 has better character models, better animations , more enemies on screen but none of that matters right?

Xtasy26

And there you go again with your freaking BS. I have NEVER stated that JC2 beats GoW3 in character models. Quit pulling **** out of your ass. What I said was that JC2 is an OVERALL (I'm not sure you understand what this word means) superior graphical game than GoW3.

But you forget. He didn't even want to acknowledge that JC2 is an action-adventure game. It's only those "hack and slah" games like GOW3. :P

Hell if he wants to compare just hack and slash games DMC4 on PC maxed out looks better than GoW3. :?

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Um no its not that depends what you like. You can spin it whatever way you want but because visually there nearly imossible to compare and you are bringing up two games that are in diffrent sub-genres with completley diffrent visual styles.

TheSterls

It's no use. You're clearly wrong yet you don't want to admit it. They're COMPLETELY comparable and Just Cause 2 has better overall technical graphics no matter what way you look at it.

If you look at the areas of charcter models , animations those are techincal parts of the visuals as well you said it looks better no matter how you look at it so dont go backtracking now.

He said overall, just character models and animations. What's technically impressive, for consoles, is Kratos. Mostly because of art design, but also cause they put a good amount of engine work to focus on Kratos being the one thing that stands out.

Overall, JC2 looks better. If this'll make you happy, it crushes GoW3 in all aspects except Kratos. Everything else? JC2.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

It's no use. You're clearly wrong yet you don't want to admit it. They're COMPLETELY comparable and Just Cause 2 has better overall technical graphics no matter what way you look at it.

ChubbyGuy40

If you look at the areas of charcter models , animations those are techincal parts of the visuals as well you said it looks better no matter how you look at it so dont go backtracking now.

He said overall, just character models and animations. What's technically impressive, for consoles, is Kratos. Mostly because of art design, but also cause they put a good amount of engine work to focus on Kratos being the one thing that stands out.

Overall, JC2 looks better. If this'll make you happy, it crushes GoW3 in all aspects except Kratos. Everything else? JC2.

Don't forget those blood effects ;) They're super important :lol:

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

And for its crappy blob textures and bad geometry.

"Textures are greatly lacking in detail, and some jagged edges and blocky geometry make Cryostasis look uneven"

right from the gamespot review.

TheSterls

"Despite that, the graphics technology has a difficult time keeping up. The game is prone to major fits of slowdown, even on machines that greatly exceed its minimum requirements, which is a head-scratcher in a game that clearly doesn't push the limits of modern technology."

So that didn't influence their score. The only thing that looked bad, from videos and from what I've played of it so far, is this weird frost/cold/frozen texture I've seen in a few places. It looks like a giant pine needle thats frozen. It looks really odd and out of place.

Despite that, tech wise Cryostasis better than UC2. What saved UC2 was it's art design.

Why did you take out the quote that i listed which is clearly in the review? UNC2 an gow3 have no complaints about there techncial visuals nothing like that and no Crysostasis froma technical standpoint looks horrible. It uses low levels of geometry , uneven textures , runs like crap , has terrible animations , Im really not sure where you are getting off that it looks better technically but im tired of arguing with you guys have a good night.

What's to complain about? theres nothing better on consoles. If they said it looked lackluster compared to crysis well...that's just common knowledge. It'd be unprofessional on their side.

Has terrible animations? I'll play your game some more.

"Additionally, though not always perfectly smooth, good animations bring characters to life, human and nonhuman alike"

Seriously, get your own opinion and play the game yourself instead of going and twisting what "professionals" have to say. It most certainly does not look horrible.

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Yea i have i have played it on DX10 though not on DX11 but how conveniant. Your buddy happens to have it :roll:

TheSterls

Dude, God Of War 3 doesn't have better lighting then Stalker or Metro..... :?

You told me Cryotasis looked better then Uc2 with its lame graphic merrit :|

I've never said that. :roll:

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

If you look at the areas of charcter models , animations those are techincal parts of the visuals as well you said it looks better no matter how you look at it so dont go backtracking now.

Eggimannd

He said overall, just character models and animations. What's technically impressive, for consoles, is Kratos. Mostly because of art design, but also cause they put a good amount of engine work to focus on Kratos being the one thing that stands out.

Overall, JC2 looks better. If this'll make you happy, it crushes GoW3 in all aspects except Kratos. Everything else? JC2.

Don't forget those blood effects ;) They're super important :lol:

That's art not tech :P Kratos looks beast showered in blood. Still doesn't look even nearly as impressive as the Nano suit soldiers :D

But ya, know... Uncharted 2 and God of War 3 apparently look better.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]

It's no use. You're clearly wrong yet you don't want to admit it. They're COMPLETELY comparable and Just Cause 2 has better overall technical graphics no matter what way you look at it.

ChubbyGuy40

If you look at the areas of charcter models , animations those are techincal parts of the visuals as well you said it looks better no matter how you look at it so dont go backtracking now.

He said overall, just character models and animations. What's technically impressive, for consoles, is Kratos. Mostly because of art design, but also cause they put a good amount of engine work to focus on Kratos being the one thing that stands out.

Overall, JC2 looks better. If this'll make you happy, it crushes GoW3 in all aspects except Kratos. Everything else? JC2.

Don't forget those GPU Cuda effects that GOW3 can only dream of:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A29uSkIo04s

^^ PS3 GOW3 can't even do any of these.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

Dude, God Of War 3 doesn't have better lighting then Stalker or Metro..... :?

WhenCicadasCry

You told me Cryotasis looked better then Uc2 with its lame graphic merrit :|

I've never said that. :roll:

And there he goes for the millionth time pulling something out of his ass.

I just love it how it's always us arguing against Sterls. I think it's partly because this guy makes wild exaggerated claims. Like how he implied JC2 isn't considered an Action-Adventure game because it's not "hack and slah" game like GOW3 despite the fact that JC2 is in the Action-Adventure category. Talk about looniness. He can't seem to admit anything that his PS3 can do PC can do better by miles ahead. And yes that includes games running at FULL HD 1080P 16X FSAA and 16X Anistrophic Filtering which is PS3's wet dream. PCs pwn consoles. :D

I just love it how it's always us arguing against Sterls. I think it's partly because this guy makes wild exaggerated claims. Like how he implied JC2 isn't considered an Action-Adventure game because it's not "hack and slah" game like GOW3 despite the fact that JC2 is in the Action-Adventure category. Talk about looniness. He can't seem to admit anything that his PS3 can do PC can do better by miles ahead. And yes that includes games running at FULL HD 1080P 16X FSAA and 16X Anistrophic Filtering which is PS3's wet dream. PCs pwn consoles. :D

Xtasy26

I think "Krazy Kaz" has his family hostage. I've never seen someone defend Playstation 3 games so passionately. :P

I kinda like the console exclusives more than the PC's so those are my thoughts on this topic.

As for graphics, It kinda depends but usually the PC has the edge here. Where you don't see this as being so black and white in comparison is on those exclusive games I mentioned where the games usually are built to take advantage of every single aspect of that console and thus look, run, and perform best on those systems.

I just love it how it's always us arguing against Sterls. I think it's partly because this guy makes wild exaggerated claims. Like how he implied JC2 isn't considered an Action-Adventure game because it's not "hack and slah" game like GOW3 despite the fact that JC2 is in the Action-Adventure category. Talk about looniness. He can't seem to admit anything that his PS3 can do PC can do better by miles ahead. And yes that includes games running at FULL HD 1080P 16X FSAA and 16X Anistrophic Filtering which is PS3's wet dream. PCs pwn consoles. :D

Xtasy26

Next time he tries something like that hand him your empty care cup and move on. ;)

I just love it how it's always us arguing against Sterls. I think it's partly because this guy makes wild exaggerated claims. Like how he implied JC2 isn't considered an Action-Adventure game because it's not "hack and slah" game like GOW3 despite the fact that JC2 is in the Action-Adventure category. Talk about looniness. He can't seem to admit anything that his PS3 can do PC can do better by miles ahead. And yes that includes games running at FULL HD 1080P 16X FSAA and 16X Anistrophic Filtering which is PS3's wet dream. PCs pwn consoles. :D

Xtasy26

[QUOTE="Xtasy26"]

I just love it how it's always us arguing against Sterls. I think it's partly because this guy makes wild exaggerated claims. Like how he implied JC2 isn't considered an Action-Adventure game because it's not "hack and slah" game like GOW3 despite the fact that JC2 is in the Action-Adventure category. Talk about looniness. He can't seem to admit anything that his PS3 can do PC can do better by miles ahead. And yes that includes games running at FULL HD 1080P 16X FSAA and 16X Anistrophic Filtering which is PS3's wet dream. PCs pwn consoles. :D

WhenCicadasCry

I think "Krazy Kaz" has his family hostage.

Good one. :P

I think he finally ran away. I hope i didnt jinx it. :Pferret-gamer

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]I think he finally ran away. I hope i didnt jinx it. :PNVIDIATI

I'm not even sure if he realizes that higher resolutions cost VRAM. He claims that Uncharted 2 is graphically superior to many of the PC graphical marvels, yet the PS3 could only dream of running MULTIPLATS at 1080p, yet alone PCs best looking games. :lol: But teh assetz!

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"][QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]I think he finally ran away. I hope i didnt jinx it. :Pocstew

[QUOTE="ocstew"][QUOTE="NVIDIATI"] No, he'll be back soon... He'll just wait to try and get the last word in.NVIDIATI

Dudes check this link you will know what pcs are capable

http://www.incrysis.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=907&Itemid=1

brettlee01