[QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"][QUOTE="t3hTwinky"]Christianity is derivative of pretty much every major religion ever, Star Wars takes much of it's material from old Samurai films, and Lord of the Rings blends all kinds of old poems, legends, and myths together for one very fine product.
Calling Halo influential is one thing, calling it the most influential shooter since Doom is something else entirely.
t3hTwinky
Wow, the ignorance is strong in this one. Not only was that irrelevant, some of it was just utterly wrong.
Christianity only assimilated certain other religious festivals and incorporated it into their own. Their beliefs are their own however. Star Wars was inspired by Greek Mythology (Samurai films lol) and Lord of the Rings. The Lord of the Rings was heavily inspired by norse mythology, and the concept of Good and Evil present in the Bible itself. Another example: Michael Jackson was influenced by Fred Astaire, James Brown, Stevie Wonder and a few others. Yet he's considered one of the most influential people in the music industry. Did it matter that he was inspired by those before him? Of course not.
Itt is irrelevant. They are (or were) all influential, and they are rather popular.
I'm going to ignore the fact that you just called me ignorant while making a bad Star Wars pun and then said Christianity is completely original outside of assimilating pagan holidays into its own mythos. I'll clairify.
Doom is practically the single template from which all other shooters have been wrought. Half-Life introduced an atmosphere and way of telling a story through gaming that's downright cinematic, and has repeated itself in almost every modern shooter since.
Halo gave us health regen and a grenade button.
How stupid would it sound if someone said that Scientology is the most influential religion since that of the ancient Greeks?
Tell me you know what I'm saying here. I don't want to be flamed for comparing Halo to Scientology and Disco in the same topic. :lol:
What was the bad Star Wars pun? I see no pun worthy of Shakespeare. I'm ignorant in this way, so please, enlighten me.
And don't start talking to me about religions mate. I've done more than just read online intarwebz articles on religion (which a lot of it is fluff. I can see why a lot of internet forum users are athiests) unlike most of you people have and think you're utter sages on the topic. In any case most of you guys focus on one thing: controversy. But that's another matter I'd like to keep to the religion boards.
Right, so Half Life is Ghost in the Shell. Innovative in its own right, inspiring, but the influential? Sure, the Matrix was influenced by GitS, in imagery and concept. The Matrix just bought in bullet time. But does that mean The Transporter, Equilibrium, Underworld -- all those Matrix esque clones are inspired by GitS?
Innovation is not influence. It's can affect, yes, but certainly doesn't mean it's necessarily true.
If that was the case, indie films would be influencing Hollywood productions left and right. Not true.
Log in to comment