Rumor: Ps4 devs have access to 7GB GDDR5 RAM

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]So thats 1GB dedicated to the Sony OS / Sony Kinect rip-off LOLtrollhunter2

didnt ms rip off eyetoy first, or am I missing something here:?

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] Then you have the 6gb Titan and 3gb or 6gb 7970's. Also they can never use more then 4gb for the gpu since the PS4 gpu isnt strong enough make use of the amount of memory to the fullest potential. clyde46

You mean you dont have, because noonw buys 5000$ video cards

Selling so well that only .5% of hermits have the 7970 and only 1% have the GTX680

http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/

:lol:

[QUOTE="AzatiS"]Mooooo !! Ill be a cow this gen it seems !! PS4 seems solid to me and i cant wait to learn more about the system.. When developers praising it its a very good sign. periodloosingENDS

PC people think that anyone cares if PC has more raw power, when they dont have a single game like Deep Down or Agnis to use it

Plus missing all exlusive JRPGs that are my top priority, while PS4 already got Witcher 3 and the only proper Diablo 3 version (offline, direct hero control)

PC gaming is for laughs

Funny fact: xbox 360 Witcher 2 version has like 1000x more next gen lighting than PC version

LOL, PC, LOL LOL

wow your trolling is getting sloppy

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

PC people think that anyone cares if PC has more raw power, when they dont have a single game like Deep Down or Agnis to use it

Plus missing all exlusive JRPGs that are my top priority, while PS4 already got Witcher 3 and the only proper Diablo 3 version (offline, direct hero control)

PC gaming is for laughs

Funny fact: xbox 360 Witcher 2 version has like 1000x more next gen lighting than PC version

LOL, PC, LOL LOL

loosingENDS

Yet Witcher 2 looks best on PC.

If you like knights with armor that glows like a lamp at night and have no next gen proper lighting and shadows, sure

If you like next gen realistic lighting, with actual light source, proper shadows and no glow/bloom, it is only found on xbox 360 version

What are you talking about ? X360 has lower setting plenty of other stuff.

There's nothing next gen about X360, it doesn't even have a actual sun in the Witcher 2.

[QUOTE="Snugenz"]

[QUOTE="Blazerdt47"]

As far as I know, the X720 will be using more RAM for it's OS because of Kinect.

RR360DD

Serious question, did you just pull that out of your ass?.

Were are people getting all these details from about a console with no official acknowledgment as of yet.

lol but 720 is a DVR player first and a game macheine second 

"Microsoft is even rumored to include advanced DVR functionality in the upcoming Xbox 720, which will no doubt require copious amounts of RAM."

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

You mean you dont have, because noonw buys 5000$ video cards

DarthaPerkinjan

Selling so well that only .5% of hermits have the 7970 and only 1% have the GTX680

http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/

:lol:

Steam is now the official sales report everybody!

[QUOTE="DarthaPerkinjan"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"] Thats funny, last time I checked the GTX680 and the 7970 were selling very well. Bebi_vegeta

Selling so well that only .5% of hermits have the 7970 and only 1% have the GTX680

http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/

:lol:

Steam is now the official sales report everybody!

I think 8Gb is just right......

• RAM for the game
• RAM for the graphics
• RAM for buffering video footage to the hard drive
• 1Gb RAM for the OS
• Some extra RAM for future-proofing

I don't see where the problem is.......

[QUOTE="super600"]

All of that won't be used for graphics.

Heil68

1.01 %

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="DarthaPerkinjan"]

Selling so well that only .5% of hermits have the 7970 and only 1% have the GTX680

http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/

:lol:

SaltyMeatballs

Steam is now the official sales report everybody!

Well maybe if these numbers we're reported by the actual company then some system war fool.

Also, the PS4 is not even out... and there's already a new GPU around the corner from AMD and Nvidia.

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"][QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

Steam is now the official sales report everybody!

Bebi_vegeta

Well maybe if these numbers we're reported by the actual company then some system war fool.

Also, the PS4 is not even out... and there's already a new GPU around the corner from AMD and Nvidia.

Like a new GPU will bring the JRPGs to PC

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

If you like knights with armor that glows like a lamp at night and have no next gen proper lighting and shadows, sure

If you like next gen realistic lighting, with actual light source, proper shadows and no glow/bloom, it is only found on xbox 360 version

loosingENDS

What are you talking about ? X360 has lower setting plenty of other stuff.

There's nothing next gen about X360, it doesn't even have a actual sun in the Witcher 2.

xbox 360 version has next gen lighting, PC has a bloom instead of that

Check it out, it may destroy the little dream world PC gamers live in, but is a fact

Digital Foundry has all the pics to prove it

Next gen lighting ? Yes because X360 has next gen hardware.

Also, can you show me a sun in the X360 version ? I really wonder where the heck they get the lighting source... oh wait it's next gen, don't need no sun.

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"] Got a better source "oh, they sell better", well other sh*t sells even more. And it's not as if people with powerful hardware don't like to boast about it.loosingENDS

Well maybe if these numbers we're reported by the actual company then some system war fool.

Also, the PS4 is not even out... and there's already a new GPU around the corner from AMD and Nvidia.

Like a new GPU will bring the JRPGs to PC

Oh, must be a reason why I don't have a console anymore, it must of been because JRPG were so important to my life.

Damage control wont save the day in this situation

PC simply has last gen bloom, something PC people used to laugh at when the first launch console games used it back in 2005

Xbox 360 has next gen proper lighting, a light source and proper shadows on charatcers, that also DO NOT GLOW !!! LOL

PC is laughable, that is all

loosingENDS

Your in so much denial :lol:

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

xbox 360 version has next gen lighting, PC has a bloom instead of that

Check it out, it may destroy the little dream world PC gamers live in, but is a fact

Digital Foundry has all the pics to prove it

loosingENDS

Next gen lighting ? Yes because X360 has next gen hardware.

Also, can you show me a sun in the X360 version ? I really wonder where the heck they get the lighting source... oh wait it's next gen, don't need no sun.

Damage control wont save the day in this situation

PC simply has last gen bloom, something PC people used to laugh at when the first launch console games used it back in 2005

Xbox 360 has next gen proper lighting, a light source and proper shadows on charatcers, that also DO NOT GLOW !!! LOL

PC is laughable, that is all

I see you stopped using the crappy dragon on the bridge comparison 

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Damage control wont save the day in this situation

PC simply has last gen bloom, something PC people used to laugh at when the first launch console games used it back in 2005

Xbox 360 has next gen proper lighting, a light source and proper shadows on charatcers, that also DO NOT GLOW !!! LOL

PC is laughable, that is all

04dcarraher

Your in so much denial :lol:

I can say the same for the PC gamers that now say bloom and crappy lighting is "better", because Witcher 2 lighing on PC is garbage comparing to xbox 360 version

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Damage control wont save the day in this situation

PC simply has last gen bloom, something PC people used to laugh at when the first launch console games used it back in 2005

Xbox 360 has next gen proper lighting, a light source and proper shadows on charatcers, that also DO NOT GLOW !!! LOL

PC is laughable, that is all

loosingENDS

Your in so much denial :lol:

I can say the same for the PC gamers that now say bloom and crappy lighting is "better", because Witcher 2 lighing on PC is garbage comparing to xbox 360 version

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Damage control wont save the day in this situation

PC simply has last gen bloom, something PC people used to laugh at when the first launch console games used it back in 2005

Xbox 360 has next gen proper lighting, a light source and proper shadows on charatcers, that also DO NOT GLOW !!! LOL

PC is laughable, that is all

loosingENDS

Your in so much denial :lol:

I can say the same for the PC gamers that now say bloom and crappy lighting is "better", because Witcher 2 lighing on PC is garbage comparing to xbox 360 version

But the PC version looks better

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

Speculation by fanboys said devs had a lower allocation, good to hear I suppose. That's what the Wii U OS is using, about 1GB of RAM. I'm sure the 720 will use about the same.

Looking forward to seeing more games.

Blazerdt47

As far as I know, the X720 will be using more RAM for it's OS because of Kinect.

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

What are you talking about ? X360 has lower setting plenty of other stuff.

There's nothing next gen about X360, it doesn't even have a actual sun in the Witcher 2.

Bebi_vegeta

xbox 360 version has next gen lighting, PC has a bloom instead of that

Check it out, it may destroy the little dream world PC gamers live in, but is a fact

Digital Foundry has all the pics to prove it

Next gen lighting ? Yes because X360 has next gen hardware.

Also, can you show me a sun in the X360 version ? I really wonder where the heck they get the lighting source... oh wait it's next gen, don't need no sun.

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

Your in so much denial :lol:

04dcarraher

I can say the same for the PC gamers that now say bloom and crappy lighting is "better", because Witcher 2 lighing on PC is garbage comparing to xbox 360 version

LOL, you are funny

The "EE version" with the "100x better graphics" are just in your imagination

In real world, Witcher 2 on xbox 360 has next gen lighting and not crappy bloom and lack of light and shadow like on PC, and is directly proven by the actual real world (you know, the one not in your imagination) pics in Digital Foundry article

now go on tell us about your fantasies of some "better" Withcer 2 version on PC

7 GB is easily enough for games.  4 GB would've been fine.

[QUOTE="AzatiS"]Mooooo !! Ill be a cow this gen it seems !! PS4 seems solid to me and i cant wait to learn more about the system.. When developers praising it its a very good sign. periodloosingENDS

PC people think that anyone cares if PC has more raw power, when they dont have a single game like Deep Down or Agnis to use it

Plus missing all exlusive JRPGs that are my top priority, while PS4 already got Witcher 3 and the only proper Diablo 3 version (offline, direct hero control)

PC gaming is for laughs

Funny fact: xbox 360 Witcher 2 version has like 1000x more next gen lighting than PC version

LOL, PC, LOL LOL

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

I can say the same for the PC gamers that now say bloom and crappy lighting is "better", because Witcher 2 lighing on PC is garbage comparing to xbox 360 version

loosingENDS

LOL, you are funny

The "EE version" with the "100x better graphics" are just in your imagination

In real world, Witcher 2 on xbox 360 has next gen lighting and not crappy bloom and lack of light and shadow like on PC, and is directly proven by the actual real world (you know, the one not in your imagination) pics in Digital Foundry article

now go on tell us about your fantasies of some "better" Withcer 2 version on PC

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

 

But the PC version looks better

loosingENDS

If you like garbage last gen bloom and lighting, without actual light source and shadows, sure PC is "better"

For the next gen lighting, there is only the xbox 360 version though

I though PC gamers liked next gen lighting and not garbage bloom, seems this is not the case

7 GB is easily enough for games.  4 GB would've been fine.

PC_Otter

Streaming and video recording is not normal background tasks, and how about your 512mb OS claim :lol:

04dcarraher

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

 

But the PC version looks better

loosingENDS

If you like garbage last gen bloom and lighting, without actual light source and shadows, sure PC is "better"

For the next gen lighting, there is only the xbox 360 version though

I though PC gamers liked next gen lighting and not garbage bloom, seems this is not the case

Someone dig up that screenshot from the email someone sent to a CDProjektRed dev saying the PC version was also updated with the same stuff as the 360 port. clyde46

And back to reality, there is no such thing, PC never got the new lighting as Digital Foundry clearly confirmed in their last paragraph in the article

PC did get updated with the new stuff of Enchanced Edition, BESIDES the new lighting though, because that would mean changing the whole PC engine and they simply did not do it

Except it looks better

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

If you like garbage last gen bloom and lighting, without actual light source and shadows, sure PC is "better"

For the next gen lighting, there is only the xbox 360 version though

I though PC gamers liked next gen lighting and not garbage bloom, seems this is not the case

loosingENDS

Denial is a strong force

Digital Foundry confirmed the ENCHANCED PC version they played DID NOT have the new xbox 360 lighting

"Update:We've now updatedour PC build of The Witcher 2 and note that many of the 360 enhancements - specifically pad support, lighting and visuals - appear to be unchanged"

Anything else ?

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] AWW someone's in denial that Pc version didnt get the same enhancements. and that review was non EE Pc version vs 360 EE version And they state PC version is overall much better lookinglostrib

After they updated, they had the EE PC version obviously, did you even read what i posted above ?

look at that next gen lighting:

it's so next gen, it doesnt need shadows

vs

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

After they updated, they had the EE PC version obviously, did you even read what i posted above ?

loosingENDS

look at that next gen lighting:

it's so next gen, it doesnt need shadows

Obviously you dont know what shadow is, because i clearly see shadows

And without the horrible dithering of PC version LOL

and now you're just lying. None of the battlements/crenellations on the bridge have shadows

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

After they updated, they had the EE PC version obviously, did you even read what i posted above ?

loosingENDS

look at that next gen lighting:

it's so next gen, it doesnt need shadows

Obviously you dont know what shadow is, because i clearly see shadows

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="04dcarraher"] They however never state how much memory will be allocated for streaming/recording. So if background tasks and OS is allocating 1gb I would think along with the other features 2-3gb might be typical usage with all features +OS. So 5-6 gb will be for the game cache and video.

04dcarraher

Streaming and video recording is not background , and how about your 512mb OS claim :lol:

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Obviously you dont know what shadow is, because i clearly see shadows

loosingENDS

The removed some of the dithered terrible and laughable PC shadows and let less with vastly better quality

It is just a trade off and i prefer it that way TBH, who wants many terrible looking shadows ? (only PC gamers i guess, that also love bloom than next gen lighting)

Plus is all kinds of funny that we moved to new pics, since the pics i posted look 1000x more next gen than PC

LOL, so much (crappy) damage control

Worse lighting. Confirmed by LoosingEnds himself!

[QUOTE="SuddenlySudden"]No one gives a shit in 3...2...1.... Most of you have no idea what RAM does for gaming in 3....2....1 Some of you probably think there's an actual live mini Ram in your ps3 on a treadmill in 3....2....1killzowned24

[QUOTE="Tessellation"] such a butthurt comeback :cool: pointing out your sketchy source is hurting you,now cry some more.tormentos

why are people surprised that an OS is taking up ram........stereointegrity

Because it is a console and the OS should be minimal

That 1GB is probably also including space for caching videos etc

Anyone able to explain this in English? i dont get dis nerdy shit :(

is this good or bad? :o

Anyone able to explain this in English? i dont get dis nerdy shit :(

is this good or bad? :o

finalstar2007

There's lots of RAM for games, but some people think 1GB of RAM is too much for the OS

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"]why are people surprised that an OS is taking up ram........loosingENDS

Because it is a console and the OS should be minimal

That 1GB is probably also including space for caching videos etc

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"]why are people surprised that an OS is taking up ram........PC_Otter

Because it is a console and the OS should be minimal

That 1GB is probably also including space for caching videos etc

I think PS4 implementation will be nothing like FRAPS that has to conform to what the OS allows for getting the stream

Probably the PS4 one will be close to free, otherwise would make no sense at all to have such a feature that noone would care about and yet compromise the quality of every game

Just makes zero sense, unless Sony people escaped from a nut house

[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

Anyone able to explain this in English? i dont get dis nerdy shit :(

is this good or bad? :o

lostrib

There's lots of RAM for games, but some people think 1GB of RAM is too much for the OS

i'll assume its a good thing lol

Fraps is a terrible fvcking standard, i'm pretty sure whatever the ps4 has planned won't half your framerate when you record.

Fraps is a terrible fvcking standard, i'm pretty sure whatever the ps4 has planned won't half your framerate when you record.

ReadingRainbow4

Obviously will be near free on PS4, otherwise would be crazy to have such a useless feature make games 1000x worse looking

Unless Sony guys escaped from a crazy asylum