View image to see full res8)
Link
By far the best looking fantasy RPG:shock:
**update** found some new gameplay screens :D
Here is a DA2 screen... just for the Lulz8) c'mon:oops: I have to make this thread SW material
This topic is locked from further discussion.
View image to see full res8)
Link
By far the best looking fantasy RPG:shock:
**update** found some new gameplay screens :D
Here is a DA2 screen... just for the Lulz8) c'mon:oops: I have to make this thread SW material
You're not serious at all, I max out Two Worlds 2 and it looks pretty meh, it also has very ugly characters while The Witcher 2 does not. This is like the greatest looking RPG by quite a large margin.Is Shani in the game. I don't like Triss.
Looks about as good as Two Worlds 2 does.
GeneralShowzer
[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]You're not serious at all, I max out Two Worlds 2 and it looks pretty meh, it also has very ugly characters while The Witcher 2 does not. This is like the greatest looking RPG by quite a large margin. Only the first screen is game-play. And it doesn't look THAT good. If you've seen game-play you know that the texture loading is a disaster.Is Shani in the game. I don't like Triss.
Looks about as good as Two Worlds 2 does.
110million
It's a multi-platform engine, and CD Projekt has confirmed that not only it runs, but it looks the same on consoles. This isn't the game to brag PC power with. Try Shogun 2 or Crysis 2.And console gamers think this will be out on the lolsoles.
Unless the lolsoles can magically become non-crappy cheap PCs from 6 years ago I don't see how it can happen.
haberman13
[QUOTE="haberman13"]It's a multi-platform engine, and CD Projekt has confirmed that not only it runs, but it looks the same on consoles. This isn't the game to brag PC power with. Try Shogun 2 or Crysis 2.And console gamers think this will be out on the lolsoles.
Unless the lolsoles can magically become non-crappy cheap PCs from 6 years ago I don't see how it can happen.
GeneralShowzer
I'm just saying, consoles are really awful now that they are so old, so I would expect serious aliasing and a removal of bump mapping to make it work ... but you are right, it COULD work. I just don't think they will make it work, because it would seriously downgrade the quality of the game to play on a lolsole.
Crysis 2 has already proven to run terribly on the consoles, no need to attack those shoddy mini-PCs for that game.
And console gamers think this will be out on the lolsoles.
Unless the lolsoles can magically become non-crappy cheap PCs from 6 years ago I don't see how it can happen.
haberman13
What's a lolsole?
[QUOTE="110million"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]You're not serious at all, I max out Two Worlds 2 and it looks pretty meh, it also has very ugly characters while The Witcher 2 does not. This is like the greatest looking RPG by quite a large margin. Only the first screen is game-play. And it doesn't look THAT good. If you've seen game-play you know that the texture loading is a disaster. If you looked at the release date, you'd know nothing you've seen is final. Cutscene wise, The Witcher 2 decimates Two Worlds 2, we'll need to see more gameplay, in high quality screens to judge entirely, but even the first screen looks betterIs Shani in the game. I don't like Triss.
Looks about as good as Two Worlds 2 does.
GeneralShowzer
It's a multi-platform engine, and CD Projekt has confirmed that not only it runs, but it looks the same on consoles. This isn't the game to brag PC power with. Try Shogun 2 or Crysis 2.[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="haberman13"]
And console gamers think this will be out on the lolsoles.
Unless the lolsoles can magically become non-crappy cheap PCs from 6 years ago I don't see how it can happen.
haberman13
I'm just saying, consoles are really awful now that they are so old, so I would expect serious aliasing and a removal of bump mapping to make it work ... but you are right, it COULD work. I just don't think they will make it work, because it would seriously downgrade the quality of the game to play on a lolsole.
The combat, the UI, it's all designed with consoles in mind. There would be no real downgrade. Maybe upgrade, because it seems it plays better with a controller. Every presentation, game-play demo is with a controller. Makes me wonder if it will even feel natural on PC. The developers tried really hard to make me not buy the sequel to my favorite this gen RPG.[QUOTE="haberman13"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] It's a multi-platform engine, and CD Projekt has confirmed that not only it runs, but it looks the same on consoles. This isn't the game to brag PC power with. Try Shogun 2 or Crysis 2. GeneralShowzer
I'm just saying, consoles are really awful now that they are so old, so I would expect serious aliasing and a removal of bump mapping to make it work ... but you are right, it COULD work. I just don't think they will make it work, because it would seriously downgrade the quality of the game to play on a lolsole.
The combat, the UI, it's all designed with consoles in mind. There would be no real downgrade. Maybe upgrade, because it seems it plays better with a controller. Every presentation, game-play demo is with a controller. Makes me wonder if it will even feel natural on PC. The developers tried really hard to make me not buy the sequel to my favorite this gen RPG.I hear you, I do. But IMO that was CDProjeck's attempt to secure either future sales in the IP or a possible port in the future. My only point is: those screenshots are not possible on a lolsole, making the experience (regardless of a slight controller favoritism [which isn't proven by any means]) degraded. An RPG is all about immersion, and the lolesoles are immersion killers with their shoddy controls and terrible graphics.
The foliage in the last pic looks exactly like the one in crysis!added more gameplay screens 8)
devious742
for the last year or so i have considered witcher 2 as a preview of what next gen console games may look like.
Doesn't mean they are actual game-play screens. Touched up screenshots are no news in the buisness. They showcased how the game looks like on GS. It looks bad.added more gameplay screens 8)
devious742
The combat, the UI, it's all designed with consoles in mind. There would be no real downgrade. Maybe upgrade, because it seems it plays better with a controller. Every presentation, game-play demo is with a controller. Makes me wonder if it will even feel natural on PC. The developers tried really hard to make me not buy the sequel to my favorite this gen RPG.[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="haberman13"]
I'm just saying, consoles are really awful now that they are so old, so I would expect serious aliasing and a removal of bump mapping to make it work ... but you are right, it COULD work. I just don't think they will make it work, because it would seriously downgrade the quality of the game to play on a lolsole.
haberman13
I hear you, I do. But IMO that was CDProjeck's attempt to secure either future sales in the IP or a possible port in the future. My only point is: those screenshots are not possible on a lolsole, making the experience (regardless of a slight controller favoritism [which isn't proven by any means]) degraded. An RPG is all about immersion, and the lolesoles are immersion killers with their shoddy controls and terrible graphics.
General Showzer seems pretty upset because the game is easily moved to a console, but the game looks completely uneffected, just because the UI works on a console doesn't mean it won't on PC, CD Projeckt would not sacrifice their integrity, its going to be awesome, I'm willing to bet heavily that The Witcher 2 will be the best RPG this year, even with all the other big games. At worst it will be better than Two Worlds 2.[QUOTE="devious742"]Doesn't mean they are actual game-play screens. Touched up screenshots are no news in the buisness. They showcased how the game looks like on GS. It looks bad.yeah... sure touched up screens;) on pc :lol:added more gameplay screens 8)
GeneralShowzer
[QUOTE="haberman13"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] The combat, the UI, it's all designed with consoles in mind. There would be no real downgrade. Maybe upgrade, because it seems it plays better with a controller. Every presentation, game-play demo is with a controller. Makes me wonder if it will even feel natural on PC. The developers tried really hard to make me not buy the sequel to my favorite this gen RPG.110million
I hear you, I do. But IMO that was CDProjeck's attempt to secure either future sales in the IP or a possible port in the future. My only point is: those screenshots are not possible on a lolsole, making the experience (regardless of a slight controller favoritism [which isn't proven by any means]) degraded. An RPG is all about immersion, and the lolesoles are immersion killers with their shoddy controls and terrible graphics.
General Showzer seems pretty upset because the game is easily moved to a console, but the game looks completely uneffected, just because the UI works on a console doesn't mean it won't on PC, CD Projeckt would not sacrifice their integrity, its going to be awesome, I'm willing to bet heavily that The Witcher 2 will be the best RPG this year, even with all the other big games. At worst it will be better than Two Worlds 2. It doesn't have to try really hard to be better than Two Worlds 2. How do you know so much about CD Projekt? Whenever they open their mouths they are starved for attention and console development. They game is not easily movable to consoles, it's designed for consoles.The combat, the UI, it's all designed with consoles in mind. There would be no real downgrade. Maybe upgrade, because it seems it plays better with a controller. Every presentation, game-play demo is with a controller. Makes me wonder if it will even feel natural on PC. The developers tried really hard to make me not buy the sequel to my favorite this gen RPG.[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="haberman13"]
I'm just saying, consoles are really awful now that they are so old, so I would expect serious aliasing and a removal of bump mapping to make it work ... but you are right, it COULD work. I just don't think they will make it work, because it would seriously downgrade the quality of the game to play on a lolsole.
haberman13
I hear you, I do. But IMO that was CDProjeck's attempt to secure either future sales in the IP or a possible port in the future. My only point is: those screenshots are not possible on a lolsole, making the experience (regardless of a slight controller favoritism [which isn't proven by any means]) degraded. An RPG is all about immersion, and the lolesoles are immersion killers with their shoddy controls and terrible graphics.
you know putting lolsoles makes you look about 14 and your just giving C gamers a bad name[QUOTE="110million"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]You're not serious at all, I max out Two Worlds 2 and it looks pretty meh, it also has very ugly characters while The Witcher 2 does not. This is like the greatest looking RPG by quite a large margin. Only the first screen is game-play. And it doesn't look THAT good. If you've seen game-play you know that the texture loading is a disaster. You've not watched any videos so I'll give you the benefit of doubt and tell you that those are screenshots taken straight from realtime renders of the in-game engine.Is Shani in the game. I don't like Triss.
Looks about as good as Two Worlds 2 does.
GeneralShowzer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVoytJ9sXqk
Either they changed the game completely in a few weeks or those screenshots are laughably altered.
[QUOTE="110million"][QUOTE="haberman13"]General Showzer seems pretty upset because the game is easily moved to a console, but the game looks completely uneffected, just because the UI works on a console doesn't mean it won't on PC, CD Projeckt would not sacrifice their integrity, its going to be awesome, I'm willing to bet heavily that The Witcher 2 will be the best RPG this year, even with all the other big games. At worst it will be better than Two Worlds 2. It doesn't have to try really hard to be better than Two Worlds 2. How do you know so much about CD Projekt? Whenever they open their mouths they are starved for attention and console development. They game is not easily movable to consoles, it's designed for consoles. Lets see, CD Projeckt spent months after release taking user input to improve The Witcher, added a ton of content for free, went on to make GoodOldGames which is better than steam for old games by far, as they go out of their way to make them all work on Windows 7, and DRM free, they trust PC gamers and they aren't even touching a console version until the PC one is complete, they said they do tests along the way to see how the game would work on a console, but they never had to change the game in a major way for it. I am sure the game will push video cards and look awesome, those screens might not be gameplay, but they are in-engine.I hear you, I do. But IMO that was CDProjeck's attempt to secure either future sales in the IP or a possible port in the future. My only point is: those screenshots are not possible on a lolsole, making the experience (regardless of a slight controller favoritism [which isn't proven by any means]) degraded. An RPG is all about immersion, and the lolesoles are immersion killers with their shoddy controls and terrible graphics.
GeneralShowzer
perhaps you didnt read the text on that gameplay videohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVoytJ9sXqk
Either they changed the game completely in a few weeks or those screenshots are laughably altered.
GeneralShowzer
perhaps you didnt read the text on that gameplay video[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVoytJ9sXqk
Either they changed the game completely in a few weeks or those screenshots are laughably altered.
devious742
It doesn't have to try really hard to be better than Two Worlds 2. How do you know so much about CD Projekt? Whenever they open their mouths they are starved for attention and console development. They game is not easily movable to consoles, it's designed for consoles. Lets see, CD Projeckt spent months after release taking user input to improve The Witcher, added a ton of content for free, went on to make GoodOldGames which is better than steam for old games by far, as they go out of their way to make them all work on Windows 7, and DRM free, they trust PC gamers and they aren't even touching a console version until the PC one is complete, they said they do tests along the way to see how the game would work on a console, but they never had to change the game in a major way for it. I am sure the game will push video cards and look awesome, those screens might not be gameplay, but they are in-engine. Maybe you missed the interview where they say "It's designed with consoles in mind" " We don't have funds for console version" So basically with my money I'm funding the console version of a consolized game. "And we have better graphix, lolozlzol."[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="110million"] General Showzer seems pretty upset because the game is easily moved to a console, but the game looks completely uneffected, just because the UI works on a console doesn't mean it won't on PC, CD Projeckt would not sacrifice their integrity, its going to be awesome, I'm willing to bet heavily that The Witcher 2 will be the best RPG this year, even with all the other big games. At worst it will be better than Two Worlds 2. 110million
Maybe you missed the interview where they say "It's designed with consoles in mind" " We don't have funds for console version" So basically with my money I'm funding the console version of a consolized game. "And we have better graphix, lolozlzol."GeneralShowzerLets see, should I base all of my opinion on a game base off an interview that can be misinterpreted, or should I do it based off all their past accomplishments. You seem to have a solid argument.
That video is really bad quality. Anyway I can't understand why people don't think those are in-game screens using the game engine. They are really good looking graphics but they're nothing that would make me think they are fake.
Here's a video that shows some nice graphics:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_517n0aWgs&feature=related
Here's a cutscene using the game engine:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvKQ5P9jEtw&feature=related
If anyone is planning to play Witcher 2 on consoles then your doing it wrong. Those pics are amazing!
That looks better but it's not a graphical powerhouse.That video is really bad quality. Anyway I can't understand why people don't think those are in-game screens using the game engine. They are really good looking graphics but they're nothing that would make me think they are fake.
Here's a video that shows some nice graphics:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_517n0aWgs&feature=related
Here's a cutscene using the game engine:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvKQ5P9jEtw&feature=related
-Unreal-
Lets see, should I base all of my opinion on a game base off an interview that can be misinterpreted, or should I do it based off all their past accomplishments. You seem to have a solid argument. The developers of The Witcher don't have much to do with GOG. All they talk about is how they're gonna put it on consoles one glorious day, when PC gamers give them their money.[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] Maybe you missed the interview where they say "It's designed with consoles in mind" " We don't have funds for console version" So basically with my money I'm funding the console version of a consolized game. "And we have better graphix, lolozlzol."110million
[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]That looks better but it's not a graphical powerhouse.Looks better than Two Worlds 2 to me. Not sure if anyone else agrees.That video is really bad quality. Anyway I can't understand why people don't think those are in-game screens using the game engine. They are really good looking graphics but they're nothing that would make me think they are fake.
Here's a video that shows some nice graphics:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_517n0aWgs&feature=related
Here's a cutscene using the game engine:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvKQ5P9jEtw&feature=related
GeneralShowzer
[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="-Unreal-"]That looks better but it's not a graphical powerhouse.Looks better than Two Worlds 2 to me. Not sure if anyone else agrees. About the same.That video is really bad quality. Anyway I can't understand why people don't think those are in-game screens using the game engine. They are really good looking graphics but they're nothing that would make me think they are fake.
Here's a video that shows some nice graphics:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_517n0aWgs&feature=related
Here's a cutscene using the game engine:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvKQ5P9jEtw&feature=related
-Unreal-
[QUOTE="tenaka2"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] It's a multi-platform engine, and CD Projekt has confirmed that not only it runs, but it looks the same on consoles. This isn't the game to brag PC power with. Try Shogun 2 or Crysis 2. GeneralShowzerSaolin is that you? The game hasn't run on consoles at all because it hasn't even be tried yet. Yes they have tried it and it looks about the same as the PC version.
The quote was "Our internal tests suggest that it is possible" not that they have achieved it...
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment