@cainetao11: @mems_1224: @sts106mat:
Hypocrites..hahahaa Now scores are not valid now you can't play score..
After a whole fu**ing generation throwing over cows face thos high Gears,halo,Forza scores,now score are not good because well all those franchises have drop from their throne.
In fact what do you have to call halo better over killzone if it wasn't for scores.? Or Forza over GT,in fact all theories of Forza being better than GT are based purely on score,GT has always have more cars more tracks more modes than Forza,hell GT6 put Forza 5 to shame on xbox one,having dynamic day and night and weather,while aiming for 60FPS at 1440x1080p,Forza 5 had to drops those as dynamic in order to achieve 1080p 60FPS,and Forza 6 still doesn't have it dynamic which is a total joke when the damn PS3 does it.
So how comes last gen when gears was getting great scores it was valid? How did score matter last gen and some show this one they don't,you 3 know all i have to do is go thread hunting and i am 1,000% sure i will find you all 3 salivating at a damn 360 game over its scoring and throwing it at a cows face.
Hell Mems consider Resistance trash while it scored here 86,something Halo 5 didn't get here.
You 3 are a joke and this generation is down right pathetic,score,specs,sales all the 3 things you use to throw the most at cows face some how this gen don't matter,hell sts106mat threw at cows face all gen long how the xbox 360 was more powerful in his eyes because it ran multiplatforms better,when the different was smaller last gen than this one.
@hrt_rulz01 said:
@StrongBlackVine: That may be the case, but those ratings are based on opinions. Games mean different things to different people. I personally would take Sunset Overdrive over something like Bloodborne any day.
And to say that XB1's games haven't met the so-called hype, again, maybe those games did live up to some people's expectations. To put a blanket label over all XB1's games and say they are basically a failure compared to PS4's, based on review scores and averages on freakin Metacritic, is ridiculous.
But anyway, simply, I prefer XB1's games. I guess some people can't/don't understand that. Oh well. Don't really care.
Uhg pathetic at best..
So last gen when Gears got 90 high and Resistance got mid 80's scores were fu**ng valid.
Even that online Gears was a freaking mess,4 vs 4 on small maps,lags to hell and beyond,host advantage issues,bullet lag duck roll galore.
Meanwhile Resistance had 20 vs 20 matches on bigger stages and smooth as butter,gears of war got a freaking free pass because of its graphics,AI was dumb as shit in your squad,and would make you expose your self more than need it,crying for help,enemies would leave them self expose or take cover on small object but standing up leaving their complete back expose,few enemies at the same time,which by the way banish in front of your eyes and turn into a box of ammo.
It was plague by glitches and bugs like enemies getting stuck into structures,or getting stuck on holes in the grown.
Meanwhile Resistance has a great AI ( better than Halo) with enemies that would not only take cover,but that did know when you outnumber them or they out number you,some incredible weapons,interactive enemies,you could kill a chimera and it would not vanish in from of your eyes,in fact you could even shot their cooling houses and they would swing wildly into the air,you returned back a few minutes and the enemies would still be there dead giving the filling that something did happen there unlike gears which engine thanks to its graphics would not render more than a few enemies at once.
The only thing Resistance didn't have was extreme gore and great graphics,you could even read reviews were the lag was mention and many other problems to and still the site gave it a 10 not a 9 but a damn 10,while the review for Resistance was good but the score didn't reflect it.
A game like gears now would have suffer the same fate The order suffer.
Funny thing is last gen when many PS3 failed to met the hype,the same could be said many did think the game did met their hype,but sadly scores didn't and that is what lemmings used all freaking generation to claim xbox 360 games were better than PS3 ones,so downplaying scores now is a joke.
Be a man admit the xbox one has FAILED to deliver something great and move on,is sad that people here want to pretend desperately that score are not valid not,i can freaking go thread hunting and find those same posters throwing good xbox 360 scores over cows and downplaying PS3 games because of scores.
Hell uncharted drake fortunes isn't consider great here it never has being people talk as if 2 and 3 were good,when in reality it has 88% which almost a freaking 90%,but since it doesn't have 90+ like Gears 1,2,3 well it was consider bad which is a total joke because now Halo 5 is consider great with an 84 score and Quantum Break as well with 78..lol
Log in to comment