To those who say bluray isn't necessary

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for MasterDefender3
MasterDefender3

264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 MasterDefender3
Member since 2009 • 264 Posts
Blurays aren't scratch proof...no current media is scratch proof.Andrew_Xavier
Scratch resistant ! Anyway...Only haters think bad of BD.
Avatar image for BoloTheGreat
BoloTheGreat

3483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#152 BoloTheGreat
Member since 2008 • 3483 Posts

I have a Stanley knife and a belt sander here that say otherwise about your "Scratch-proofing" :twisted:

Its kinda sad when i PS3 defence threads main point is "Scratch-proofing" c'mon cows you need to get a grip on things.

Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10314 Posts

[QUOTE="Andrew_Xavier"]Blurays aren't scratch proof...no current media is scratch proof.MasterDefender3
Scratch resistant ! Anyway...Only haters think bad of BD.

LOL yeah damn haters. This BD vs. DVD battle is like trying to defend CD against DVD, a lost cause.

Avatar image for SoAmazingBaby
SoAmazingBaby

3023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 SoAmazingBaby
Member since 2009 • 3023 Posts
i haven't seen games that are bigger than fallout 3, mass effect, and gta 4 yet. It probably will be necessary next gen, but this gen it's notEndorphinMaster
speak.
Avatar image for CubanBlunt
CubanBlunt

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 CubanBlunt
Member since 2005 • 2025 Posts

Are Wii and 360 discs scratch proof? Do they perform the highest quality video and audio? And can they hold massive data 25gb, 50gb, 100gb, 150gb, 250gb?

As a PS3 owner I know my discs wont ever scratch. I know the devs aren't limited by space. And I know it will always perform at the highest quality for games and videos. And the PS3 games are the same price as a 360 game, but the PS3 game is on a much better disc.

I paid $100 more for my PS3 than for my 360, but I get so much more for it and I don't pay to play online.

It is necessary for preventing scratches, for having quality audio/video, and for allowing devs to make a game as big as they want to.

patriots7672

I own a PS3, I just want to address some of yout points?

1) Scratch proof disk, I like the fact that blu-ray disk can play when scratched, but some people take care of there disk so thats not a issue with some people.....but I see what you're saying.

2) 25gb, 50gb, 100gb, 150gb, 250gb blu-ray limits, the whole world know the benefits of this expect the 360nation. About the highest quality for games, all I can say is not yet, but it will. Videos....yes

Only the 360nation thinks the PS3 failed while the world realize what the PS3 can do and will do..........this is my 2 cents, keep the change!!!

Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts

[QUOTE="MasterDefender3"][QUOTE="Andrew_Xavier"]Blurays aren't scratch proof...no current media is scratch proof.glez13

Scratch resistant ! Anyway...Only haters think bad of BD.

LOL yeah damn haters. This BD vs. DVD battle is like trying to defend CD against DVD, a lost cause.

IS that why DVDs are still outselling Blu-Rays on a...what was it, fifteen to one basis?
Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#157 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
Methinks the TC needs a refresher on what the word "necessary" means...
Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#158 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts

[QUOTE="MasterDefender3"][QUOTE="Andrew_Xavier"]Blurays aren't scratch proof...no current media is scratch proof.glez13

Scratch resistant ! Anyway...Only haters think bad of BD.

LOL yeah damn haters. This BD vs. DVD battle is like trying to defend CD against DVD, a lost cause.

The CD vs DVD analogy is flawed. The market was ready and willing to make the leap when DVD came along. An honest look around will tell you that the same is NOT true for Bluray.
Avatar image for BBQSauceMan
BBQSauceMan

58

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 BBQSauceMan
Member since 2009 • 58 Posts
Blu Ray won't be effective untill Sony puts in a fast BD drive in the PS3.
Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
[QUOTE="glez13"]

[QUOTE="MasterDefender3"] Scratch resistant ! Anyway...Only haters think bad of BD. dsmccracken

LOL yeah damn haters. This BD vs. DVD battle is like trying to defend CD against DVD, a lost cause.

The CD vs DVD analogy is flawed. The market was ready and willing to make the leap when DVD came along. An honest look around will tell you that the same is NOT true for Bluray.

Exactly. With the CD-DVD transition, you didn't have a whole new display format that warranted the purchase of a television set that has the average price of $1000.
Avatar image for PoppaGamer
PoppaGamer

1629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 PoppaGamer
Member since 2009 • 1629 Posts
[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="glez13"]

Scratch resistant ! Anyway...Only haters think bad of BD. MasterDefender3

LOL yeah damn haters. This BD vs. DVD battle is like trying to defend CD against DVD, a lost cause.

IS that why DVDs are still outselling Blu-Rays on a...what was it, fifteen to one basis?

Is that why BD has actually grown at a faster rate than DVD's in certain regions like Europe?
Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="glez13"]

LOL yeah damn haters. This BD vs. DVD battle is like trying to defend CD against DVD, a lost cause.

PoppaGamer
IS that why DVDs are still outselling Blu-Rays on a...what was it, fifteen to one basis?

Is that why BD has actually grown at a faster rate than DVD's in certain regions like Europe?

Call me when they actually start meeting half of DVD monthly sales figures, please. This whole "Well, x product might not be beating y product...but x sure as hell is selling at a faster rate than y did at this certain date in the past!" trend I'm seeing on this board is pretty sad.
Avatar image for GTR_FX
GTR_FX

1121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#163 GTR_FX
Member since 2009 • 1121 Posts
I take of my game disks so don't really care, though blu ray disks protection is nice to have
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#164 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="Andrew_Xavier"]Blurays aren't scratch proof...no current media is scratch proof.MasterDefender3
Scratch resistant ! Anyway...Only haters think bad of BD.

bad and unneeded are not the same thing
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

2) 25gb, 50gb, 100gb, 150gb, 250gb blu-ray limits, the whole world know the benefits of this expect the 360nation. About the highest quality for games, all I can say is not yet, but it will. Videos....yes

CubanBlunt
Tell me. Do you know a developer who has the time and more important the money to develop over 100GB of pure non-redundant game data? And considering the inevitable production costs involved with so much data, do you think they'd be able to recover the costs selling a $60 BD disc, also taking into account the costs of the pressing services and necessary marketing?
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="PoppaGamer"][QUOTE="Verge_6"] IS that why DVDs are still outselling Blu-Rays on a...what was it, fifteen to one basis?Verge_6
Is that why BD has actually grown at a faster rate than DVD's in certain regions like Europe?

Call me when they actually start meeting half of DVD monthly sales figures, please. This whole "Well, x product might not be beating y product...but x sure as hell is selling at a faster rate than y did at this certain date in the past!" trend I'm seeing on this board is pretty sad.

And that's for the same calendar month. We're living in the here-and-now, after all, not five years ago.
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts

[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="PoppaGamer"] Is that why BD has actually grown at a faster rate than DVD's in certain regions like Europe?HuusAsking
Call me when they actually start meeting half of DVD monthly sales figures, please. This whole "Well, x product might not be beating y product...but x sure as hell is selling at a faster rate than y did at this certain date in the past!" trend I'm seeing on this board is pretty sad.

And that's for the same calendar month. We're living in the here-and-now, after all, not five years ago.

Comparing a format that everyone has adapted to already to a new format is what isn't fair.

When you compare the two, you can see that bluray is not unhealthy in terms of growth - otherwise DVD wouldn't have made it either. Everyone has a DVD player. Not everyone has a bluray player. Naturally DVDs are going to sell more.

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#168 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts
Unlike my nephews I'm an adult and take care of my stuff. I don't scratch my discs or leave them outside the box. as for storage. I think that the HD of the PS3 actually makes blu-ray discs unnecessary for games. still good for movies though.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="Verge_6"] Call me when they actually start meeting half of DVD monthly sales figures, please. This whole "Well, x product might not be beating y product...but x sure as hell is selling at a faster rate than y did at this certain date in the past!" trend I'm seeing on this board is pretty sad.hakanakumono

And that's for the same calendar month. We're living in the here-and-now, after all, not five years ago.

Comparing a format that everyone has adapted to already to a new format is what isn't fair.

When you compare the two, you can see that bluray is not unhealthy in terms of growth - otherwise DVD wouldn't have made it either. Everyone has a DVD player. Not everyone has a bluray player. Naturally DVDs are going to sell more.

Fair or not, c'est la vie. DVD had to unseat VHS which had been in the driver's seat for close to two decades. BluRay must make its case in the here and now or it won't fly...either that or movie companies must force the issue by abandoning DVD. And with oldie-but-goody DVD's at Walmart for $5, BluRay still has an uphill climb long-term.
Avatar image for CubanBlunt
CubanBlunt

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 CubanBlunt
Member since 2005 • 2025 Posts
[QUOTE="glez13"]

[QUOTE="MasterDefender3"] Scratch resistant ! Anyway...Only haters think bad of BD. Verge_6

LOL yeah damn haters. This BD vs. DVD battle is like trying to defend CD against DVD, a lost cause.

IS that why DVDs are still outselling Blu-Rays on a...what was it, fifteen to one basis?

You do know CD's were $30 when thet first came out too, just like Blu-Ray. You can get DVD for $5, it should out sell Ble-Ray 15-1!!!

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#171 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts
[QUOTE="PoppaGamer"][QUOTE="Verge_6"] IS that why DVDs are still outselling Blu-Rays on a...what was it, fifteen to one basis?Verge_6
Is that why BD has actually grown at a faster rate than DVD's in certain regions like Europe?

Call me when they actually start meeting half of DVD monthly sales figures, please. This whole "Well, x product might not be beating y product...but x sure as hell is selling at a faster rate than y did at this certain date in the past!" trend I'm seeing on this board is pretty sad.

I love it when they do that. It clearly exposes the desperation in their argument.
Avatar image for Zaistev_basic
Zaistev_basic

2975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#172 Zaistev_basic
Member since 2002 • 2975 Posts
Blu-Ray is ABSOLUTELY NOT NEEDED. It is only a medium that Sony wants to put to win the format war, and so they did. At the time when HD dev costs are higher than ever, and Wii and X360 have proven that Blu-Ray is so not needed in gaming, I don't see the use of Blu-Ray. As a matter of fact, Blu-Ray format forces devs to solely develop on HD, which is very expensive. Imagine if PS3 is the market leader, devs would be in a worst situation that they are right now.
Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="glez13"]

LOL yeah damn haters. This BD vs. DVD battle is like trying to defend CD against DVD, a lost cause.

CubanBlunt

IS that why DVDs are still outselling Blu-Rays on a...what was it, fifteen to one basis?

You do know CD's were $30 when thet first came out too, just like Blu-Ray. You can get DVD for $5, it should out sell Ble-Ray 15-1!!!

Good for CD then? What does this have to do with my statement?
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29844 Posts
[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="glez13"]

LOL yeah damn haters. This BD vs. DVD battle is like trying to defend CD against DVD, a lost cause.

CubanBlunt

IS that why DVDs are still outselling Blu-Rays on a...what was it, fifteen to one basis?

You do know CD's were $30 when thet first came out too, just like Blu-Ray. You can get DVD for $5, it should out sell Ble-Ray 15-1!!!

how does that have to do with blu-ray being necessary for gaming this gen?
Avatar image for CubanBlunt
CubanBlunt

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 CubanBlunt
Member since 2005 • 2025 Posts
[QUOTE="CubanBlunt"]

2) 25gb, 50gb, 100gb, 150gb, 250gb blu-ray limits, the whole world know the benefits of this expect the 360nation. About the highest quality for games, all I can say is not yet, but it will. Videos....yes

HuusAsking

Tell me. Do you know a developer who has the time and more important the money to develop over 100GB of pure non-redundant game data? And considering the inevitable production costs involved with so much data, do you think they'd be able to recover the costs selling a $60 BD disc, also taking into account the costs of the pressing services and necessary marketing?

I'm not gonna front, I dont know ANY developers personaly....do you?

Avatar image for Martin_G_N
Martin_G_N

2124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 Martin_G_N
Member since 2006 • 2124 Posts

The dvd is outdated. The X360 has been maxing out the DL DVD since launch. It can't have more than 6.8GB of gamedata on the disc because MS requires some other data on the rest of the disc, meaning the developers needs to use a lot of tricks to make the game fit. GTA 4 is 12GB on PC, and we all know the GTA games are only getting bigger.

So what will they do next gen then, fit a big HDD in each console and force people to download every game? Or will they have to sit and install 4 dvd's per game? And what happens when that HDD with all your games fails, which it will at some point. Or when you want to bring a game over to a friend. Admit it, BD is needed for gaming. And when the next gen hits, the BD drives will be a lot quicker and better.

Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#177 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

The dvd is outdated. The X360 has been maxing out the DL DVD since launch. It can't have more than 6.8GB of gamedata on the disc because MS requires some other data on the rest of the disc, meaning the developers needs to use a lot of tricks to make the game fit. GTA 4 is 12GB on PC, and we all know the GTA games are only getting bigger.

So what will they do next gen then, fit a big HDD in each console and force people to download every game? Or will they have to sit and install 4 dvd's per game? And what happens when that HDD with all your games fails, which it will at some point. Or when you want to bring a game over to a friend. Admit it, BD is needed for gaming. And when the next gen hits, the BD drives will be a lot quicker and better.

Martin_G_N

GTA IV may be bigger on PC but that doesn't mean anything. For all intents and purposes, aside from the ability to record videos in game and spiffier graphics, GTA IV on the PC is the same game as it is on consoles. So that 12 GB size doesn't mean anything.

Next generation, who knows what could happen? Microsoft could license Blu Ray technology for use in their new system (and Sony couldn't stop them if the other members of the BDA approved it). But until then, I don't seem to have any problem with playing games on DVDs in my Xbox 360, and seeing as games are still being made for DVDs, and the average game doesn't even fill a DVD, let alone spill over into a second disc, that totally destroys the argument for Blu Ray's necessity. :)

It's a luxury at this point, nothing more.

Avatar image for KGB32
KGB32

4279

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178 KGB32
Member since 2007 • 4279 Posts
seeing as how the majority of console owners dont have a HD tv or have a 5.1 setup, it's deemed as unnecessary
Avatar image for Martin_G_N
Martin_G_N

2124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 Martin_G_N
Member since 2006 • 2124 Posts
[QUOTE="Martin_G_N"]

The dvd is outdated. The X360 has been maxing out the DL DVD since launch. It can't have more than 6.8GB of gamedata on the disc because MS requires some other data on the rest of the disc, meaning the developers needs to use a lot of tricks to make the game fit. GTA 4 is 12GB on PC, and we all know the GTA games are only getting bigger.

So what will they do next gen then, fit a big HDD in each console and force people to download every game? Or will they have to sit and install 4 dvd's per game? And what happens when that HDD with all your games fails, which it will at some point. Or when you want to bring a game over to a friend. Admit it, BD is needed for gaming. And when the next gen hits, the BD drives will be a lot quicker and better.

The_Game21x

GTA IV may be bigger on PC but that doesn't mean anything. For all intents and purposes, aside from the ability to record videos in game and spiffier graphics, GTA IV on the PC is the same game as it is on consoles. So that 12 GB size doesn't mean anything.

Next generation, who knows what could happen? Microsoft could license Blu Ray technology for use in their new system (and Sony couldn't stop them if the other members of the BDA approved it). But until then, I don't seem to have any problem with playing games on DVDs in my Xbox 360, and seeing as games are still being made for DVDs, and the average game doesn't even fill a DVD, let alone spill over into a second disc, that totally destroys the argument for Blu Ray's necessity. :)

It's a luxury at this point, nothing more.

Take the Gamecube for example. It missed out on a lot of features and graphics in games like fifa and other multiplats because they could'nt or did'nt want to use more than one disc. I'm not saying they can't use dvd's for most games today, but some games allready could have been better and bigger with BD. A game like GTA SA this gen could'nt have been done on one dvd with GTA 4 graphics, even with 128kbps stereo sound. They can't use multiple discs in games like GTA.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29844 Posts
[QUOTE="CubanBlunt"][QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="CubanBlunt"]

2) 25gb, 50gb, 100gb, 150gb, 250gb blu-ray limits, the whole world know the benefits of this expect the 360nation. About the highest quality for games, all I can say is not yet, but it will. Videos....yes

Tell me. Do you know a developer who has the time and more important the money to develop over 100GB of pure non-redundant game data? And considering the inevitable production costs involved with so much data, do you think they'd be able to recover the costs selling a $60 BD disc, also taking into account the costs of the pressing services and necessary marketing?

I'm not gonna front, I dont know ANY developers personaly....do you?

he probably doesn't, but he's just saying that blu-ray isn't necessary this gen, which it isn't.
Avatar image for Steppy_76
Steppy_76

2858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#181 Steppy_76
Member since 2005 • 2858 Posts

The dvd is outdated. The X360 has been maxing out the DL DVD since launch. It can't have more than 6.8GB of gamedata on the disc because MS requires some other data on the rest of the disc, meaning the developers needs to use a lot of tricks to make the game fit. GTA 4 is 12GB on PC, and we all know the GTA games are only getting bigger.

So what will they do next gen then, fit a big HDD in each console and force people to download every game? Or will they have to sit and install 4 dvd's per game? And what happens when that HDD with all your games fails, which it will at some point. Or when you want to bring a game over to a friend. Admit it, BD is needed for gaming. And when the next gen hits, the BD drives will be a lot quicker and better.

Martin_G_N
Actually, most people don't make the case that bluray or an equivilent will NEVER be needed, merely that it isn't needed as of NOW. Judging from your comments you agree. By the time Bluray starts to make a case for being NEEDED, the PS3 won't be the only console to have it(or equivilent), but it will be the only console with a bluray drive where speed is a problem.
Avatar image for patriots7672
patriots7672

3249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#182 patriots7672
Member since 2008 • 3249 Posts
Bluray should be in every 360 and Wii just as HDMI and Component should be. It should be the standard so game devs can make the very best games they can and be able to push gaming to better higher heights and the discs that are being used by the 2 leading consoles are hurting this progress. Unscratchable discs like Bluray are also needed because kids handle the discs and other things can happen that can scratch them. HDDs and Ethernet are standards and 4p splitscreen games are abundant. The PS3 uses games that you can play more than 4 players like Smackdown VS RAW with 6 players and others. Sony is trying to push gaming to new levels and other media and should be applauded instead of ridiculed.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#183 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29844 Posts
Bluray should be in every 360 and Wii just as HDMI and Component should be. It should be the standard so game devs can make the very best games they can and be able to push gaming to better higher heights and the discs that are being used by the 2 leading consoles are hurting this progress. Unscratchable discs like Bluray are also needed because kids handle the discs and other things can happen that can scratch them. HDDs and Ethernet are standards and 4p splitscreen games are abundant. The PS3 uses games that you can play more than 4 players like Smackdown VS RAW with 6 players and others. Sony is trying to push gaming to new levels and other media and should be applauded instead of ridiculed.patriots7672
well, considering that the highest graphical fidelity is achieved on PC, which uses a hard drive, i would say you're incorrect, and Blu-Ray is not really needed for gaming. but i've noticed that most of your posts are PS3 biased, so i certainly would doubt your acknowledgement of other, superior technologies for media delivery and storage.
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#184 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts
Bluray should be in every 360 and Wii just as HDMI and Component should be. It should be the standard so game devs can make the very best games they can and be able to push gaming to better higher heights and the discs that are being used by the 2 leading consoles are hurting this progress. Unscratchable discs like Bluray are also needed because kids handle the discs and other things can happen that can scratch them. HDDs and Ethernet are standards and 4p splitscreen games are abundant. The PS3 uses games that you can play more than 4 players like Smackdown VS RAW with 6 players and others. Sony is trying to push gaming to new levels and other media and should be applauded instead of ridiculed.patriots7672
A link to AMD GAME! platform playing Race Driver GRID at 2560 X 1600 (XHD) Blu-Ray is not required for playing games. Sony should have allocated PS3's Blu-Ray budget towards the GPU (more than 8 ROPS) and video RAM.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#185 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29844 Posts
[QUOTE="patriots7672"]Bluray should be in every 360 and Wii just as HDMI and Component should be. It should be the standard so game devs can make the very best games they can and be able to push gaming to better higher heights and the discs that are being used by the 2 leading consoles are hurting this progress. Unscratchable discs like Bluray are also needed because kids handle the discs and other things can happen that can scratch them. HDDs and Ethernet are standards and 4p splitscreen games are abundant. The PS3 uses games that you can play more than 4 players like Smackdown VS RAW with 6 players and others. Sony is trying to push gaming to new levels and other media and should be applauded instead of ridiculed.ronvalencia
nice...very good example. A link to AMD GAME! platform playing Race Driver GRID at 2560 X 1600 (XHD) Blu-Ray is not required for playing games. Sony should have allocated PS3's Blu-Ray budget towards the GPU (more than 8 ROPS) and video RAM.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#186 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts
[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="patriots7672"]Bluray should be in every 360 and Wii just as HDMI and Component should be. It should be the standard so game devs can make the very best games they can and be able to push gaming to better higher heights and the discs that are being used by the 2 leading consoles are hurting this progress. Unscratchable discs like Bluray are also needed because kids handle the discs and other things can happen that can scratch them. HDDs and Ethernet are standards and 4p splitscreen games are abundant. The PS3 uses games that you can play more than 4 players like Smackdown VS RAW with 6 players and others. Sony is trying to push gaming to new levels and other media and should be applauded instead of ridiculed.clone01
nice...very good example. A link to AMD GAME! platform playing Race Driver GRID at 2560 X 1600 (XHD) Blu-Ray is not required for playing games. Sony should have allocated PS3's Blu-Ray budget towards the GPU (more than 8 ROPS) and video RAM.

Ops, I posted the wrong link. Link for GRID at 2560 x 1600
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#187 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts
Bluray may not be necessary, but its an IMPROVEMENT.
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 Chutebox  Online
Member since 2007 • 51599 Posts

All that you mentioned are advantages to BD, which I absolutely love btw!

But it is not necessary and it never will be. Nor is DVD, CD, etc et...

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#189 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

Are Wii and 360 discs scratch proof? Do they perform the highest quality video and audio? And can they hold massive data 25gb, 50gb, 100gb, 150gb, 250gb?

As a PS3 owner I know my discs wont ever scratch. I know the devs aren't limited by space. And I know it will always perform at the highest quality for games and videos. And the PS3 games are the same price as a 360 game, but the PS3 game is on a much better disc.

I paid $100 more for my PS3 than for my 360, but I get so much more for it and I don't pay to play online.

It is necessary for preventing scratches, for having quality audio/video, and for allowing devs to make a game as big as they want to.

patriots7672
Although I DO enjoy blu ray, you statements are bullocks :) You can put blu ray type video on a dvd, it just won't look as good. A standard bluray disc is 27 gigs, a double sided one is around 50gigs. DVDs use the crappy mpeg2 codec, which from 8 gigs goes easily to 2 gigs with the h264 codec. You can put a h264 video on a dvd, but it won't be played by a normal dvd player, you need something like a computer or a ps3. A dvd encoded with h264 that is 8 gigs, will look WAY WAY WAY better, however h264 eats cpu cycles and it was not popular enough back then. Either way, blu ray is nice but I mean when do consumer blu ray discs reach 50gigs plus?
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#190 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
did you know that fear 2 is only 4.9 gb even a huge game like gta 4 is only 6.8 gb, so it may be a nice feature but bluray is not NEEDED for gameing.
Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#191 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18264 Posts
i have games on CDs and DVDs that are over 10 years old and they are perfectly fine. i look after my discs. i dont need blu-rays scratch resistance....frankly i wish they would remove it and being the costs of discs down. setting aside the wii for a sec (the wiis discs hold plenty of space for the console...around 9GB can be made available with dual layer discs. the wii doesent suffer from a storage problem as far as game storage on disc goes). u need hugely expensive hardware to get the best out of uncompressed audio. the speakers in ure telly or even a 200 dollar sound system connected to ure PS3 are not good enough. getting the best out of a CD costs alot of money for heavens sake. the amount of people who have that kind of hardware and have any big interest in games is very very small (id be surprised if it got past 3%). the benefits of uncompressed audio are going to be lost to the vast majority of players. as for devs who are limited by space? sure if they want to be silly and use uncompressed audio. smart devs can get loads of content onto a DVD. bethesda have demonstrated this quite nicely with oblivion (which takes up less than half the DVD on the 360) as have bioware with mass effect. GTA4 isnt exactly small either in terms of the scale of the game. u have to bring in costs here to TC...a dev cant just make 25GB of game. hell GTA4 cost 100million dollars to make and that just fills a DVD. so what has blu-ray brought to console gaming? well its brought mandetory installs and longer loading times compared to the 360. its brought high def movies but in this forum thats irrelevant. its made the PS3 more expensive also. personally, from a games point of view, i think it has proven to be a complete waste of time and money for games this gen. its so slow that it needs a hard drive to assist with data caching in games like uncharted. the 360s cheap DVD drive can run gears, with no loading from start to finish, straight from the disc. bringing the wii back in, the wiis drive is fast enough to run MP3 straight from the disc with very minimal loading. its all done in the background. the PS3s blu-ray drive is not able to do that...it needs HDD assistance and yet it costs alot of extra money. its a nice luxury for movies. for games this gen..waste of space (excuse the pun :P). i hope sony do use it next gen as by then the technology will be ready to meet the demands of games. for the PS3, its just too slow.
Avatar image for g0ddyX
g0ddyX

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 g0ddyX
Member since 2005 • 3914 Posts

Either way, more space is needed, hdd or blu-ray.

Blu-ray does work, both in terms of movies and games.

Mgs4 made good use of blu-ray, i think big games coming out will do also.

Besides, all this is a step forward.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

Either way, more space is needed, hdd or blu-ray.

Blu-ray does work, both in terms of movies and games.

Mgs4 made good use of blu-ray, i think big games coming out will do also.

Besides, all this is a step forward.

g0ddyX
BluRay won't be needed until someone can foot the costs of developing all that material. More often than not, it's not disc space that's the constraint for developers but the budget (either time- or money-wise). They don't make stuff for free, after all. Put it this way--it wasn't due to space constraints that an analogue to Staten Island wasn't included in GTA4. Otherwise, why didin't they include it (even if extraneous) in other versions of the game?
Avatar image for CreepyBacon
CreepyBacon

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#194 CreepyBacon
Member since 2005 • 3183 Posts

Never had a disc scratch cause I take care of my games. Sound/picture quality mean nothing see the wii for further proof. Size see oblivion, fallout, gtaiv

//thread

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#195 Chutebox  Online
Member since 2007 • 51599 Posts

Never had a disc scratch cause I take care of my games. Sound/picture quality mean nothing see the wii for further proof. Size see oblivion, fallout, gtaiv

//thread

CreepyBacon

There are A LOT of 360 owners that disagree with you.

Sound/picture quality mean nothing? What the **** ?

Avatar image for CoralMark
CoralMark

481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#196 CoralMark
Member since 2008 • 481 Posts

seeing as how the majority of console owners dont have a HD tv or have a 5.1 setup, it's deemed as unnecessary KGB32

I totally agree.

And in the end, most HD video watchers don't want their player tied to a console - they want it tied to their surround [or independent].

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="CreepyBacon"]

Never had a disc scratch cause I take care of my games. Sound/picture quality mean nothing see the wii for further proof. Size see oblivion, fallout, gtaiv

//thread

Chutebox

There are A LOT of 360 owners that disagree with you.

Sound/picture quality mean nothing? What the **** ?

Prove it, sonny.
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#198 Chutebox  Online
Member since 2007 • 51599 Posts
[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="CreepyBacon"]

Never had a disc scratch cause I take care of my games. Sound/picture quality mean nothing see the wii for further proof. Size see oblivion, fallout, gtaiv

//thread

HuusAsking

There are A LOT of 360 owners that disagree with you.

Sound/picture quality mean nothing? What the **** ?

Prove it, sonny.

About disc scratching? You haven't heard of all the problems people have with 360 scratching the discs?
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#199 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="Chutebox"]

There are A LOT of 360 owners that disagree with you.

Sound/picture quality mean nothing? What the **** ?

Chutebox
Prove it, sonny.

About disc scratching? You haven't heard of all the problems people have with 360 scratching the discs?

Anecdotal evidence, potential propaganda, or worse. If it's really that bad, where's the CNN article or the advisory in Consumer Reports?
Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#200 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="Chutebox"]

There are A LOT of 360 owners that disagree with you.

Sound/picture quality mean nothing? What the **** ?

Chutebox

Prove it, sonny.

About disc scratching? You haven't heard of all the problems people have with 360 scratching the discs?

Yeah I've heard of them & its because they either knock over their console while powered on or stupid enough to pick up & tilt it, either way its not like some unavoidable disaster like RROD therefore needs not be mentioned.