Valve Shuts out Ps3 too complicated

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts

[QUOTE="After_Math"]

[QUOTE="-Pred-Alien-"]Thats funny, other developers are doing just fine:?-Pred-Alien-

QUOTE: The PC and the 360 are just more straightforward. We can focus on what we want to do, which is make game experiences, instead of sweating bullets over obscure architectural decisions they make with their platform. [...] I didn't come into this business in the 90s because of some technical fetish. I came in because I wanted to give people experiences that made them have fun.

Their just saying they just wanna make game expierences. Why should they invest tons of money and learn the PS3 architecture because of Sony's design moves?

They are a small dev (in terms of people working on products) so its understandable, but theres no reason as to why they cant support the PS3 given the money they make

yeah, there's one main reason - SONY ARROGANCE. if you followed this from the beginning that's exactly what this is about. Valve cant be ****** to solve the issues involved with the PS3 considering Sony's closed door development policy for the PS3. simple stuff. it's not like they couldn't do it - they just don't want to because Sony played it incredibly arrogant this gen.

Avatar image for clembo1990
clembo1990

9976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 clembo1990
Member since 2005 • 9976 Posts

[QUOTE="BoloTheGreat"]

[QUOTE="Jared2720"]Sounds like some of the employees at Valve need to start taking some classes at Naughty Dog University.Generalmojo

Yeah becuase ND created HL, HL2, Portal, TF2 and L4D all of which have recived numerous GOTY awards, especially HL2 and HL which is rearged by some as the greatest game of this decade and HL of the last. Oh wait, they didn't. That was Valve. Valve also created CSS and CS, still 2 of the most popular competative shooters. I think if anyone should be teaching it should be VALVE.

ND created all those games you mentioned above for the PLAYSTATION3? really

Orange Box is on PS3, and it was bugged. Why would you want a bugged game? Just get the PC version.
Avatar image for BoloTheGreat
BoloTheGreat

3483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 BoloTheGreat
Member since 2008 • 3483 Posts

[QUOTE="BoloTheGreat"]

[QUOTE="Jared2720"]Sounds like some of the employees at Valve need to start taking some classes at Naughty Dog University.Generalmojo

Yeah becuase ND created HL, HL2, Portal, TF2 and L4D all of which have recived numerous GOTY awards, especially HL2 and HL which is rearged by some as the greatest game of this decade and HL of the last. Oh wait, they didn't. That was Valve. Valve also created CSS and CS, still 2 of the most popular competative shooters. I think if anyone should be teaching it should be VALVE.

ND created all those games you mentioned above for the PLAYSTATION3? really

Valve have made flat out better games, i think they have earned the right to not make games for a system they see as being unduly difficult to work with.
Avatar image for Generalmojo
Generalmojo

3670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#54 Generalmojo
Member since 2008 • 3670 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="Jared2720"] [QUOTE="Generalmojo"]

[QUOTE="AdoringFan_"]

http://loot-ninja.com/2009/06/09/valve-shuts-out-too-complicated-ps3/

Tssk Tssk.. lazy devs confirmed :evil:

Dead-Memories

new Avatar? nice

anyway some1 needs to take these guys down the Sony Santa Monica studios to show them what real devs are 8)

Any of the 1st party Sony devs will probably never achieve what Valve has in their lifetime. If you check their history and what they've done for the gaming business. No way in hell.

right...and Nuaghty Dog was formed yesterday

Avatar image for Ryusuke_Akihiro
Ryusuke_Akihiro

425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Ryusuke_Akihiro
Member since 2007 • 425 Posts

[QUOTE="-Pred-Alien-"]Thats funny, other developers are doing just fine:?After_Math

QUOTE: The PC and the 360 are just more straightforward. We can focus on what we want to do, which is make game experiences, instead of sweating bullets over obscure architectural decisions they make with their platform. [...] I didn't come into this business in the 90s because of some technical fetish. I came in because I wanted to give people experiences that made them have fun.

Their just saying they just wanna make game expierences. Why should they invest tons of money and learn the PS3 architecture because of Sony's design moves?

For the reason they said, because they want to give people experiences that make them have fun.

I could care less really.

Avatar image for Richymisiak
Richymisiak

2589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 Richymisiak
Member since 2007 • 2589 Posts

[QUOTE="BoloTheGreat"]

[QUOTE="Jared2720"]Sounds like some of the employees at Valve need to start taking some classes at Naughty Dog University.Generalmojo

Yeah becuase ND created HL, HL2, Portal, TF2 and L4D all of which have recived numerous GOTY awards, especially HL2 and HL which is rearged by some as the greatest game of this decade and HL of the last. Oh wait, they didn't. That was Valve. Valve also created CSS and CS, still 2 of the most popular competative shooters. I think if anyone should be teaching it should be VALVE.

ND created all those games you mentioned above for the PLAYSTATION3? really

and the ps3 ports were known to be somewhat inferior to the original valve releases :)
Avatar image for Generalmojo
Generalmojo

3670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#57 Generalmojo
Member since 2008 • 3670 Posts

[QUOTE="Generalmojo"]

[QUOTE="AdoringFan_"]

http://loot-ninja.com/2009/06/09/valve-shuts-out-too-complicated-ps3/

Tssk Tssk.. lazy devs confirmed :evil:

AAllxxjjnn

new Avatar? nice

anyway some1 needs to take these guys down the Sony Santa Monica studios to show them what real devs are 8)

Did you really just call Naughty Dog better developers than Valve?

better at devoloping games for ps3 then valve, (DONT TWIST MY WORDS :P )

Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
All the people griping in here might as well just state that they really have no knowledge of Valve themselves. Their dev team is small, does not recieve nearly as much funding as many 1st party devs do. They do not have the resources, and certainly not the time, to make a different version of every game they have for a console with hardware that they are not comfortable with in terms of the 360 and PC. It is that simple. Maybe if they were a massive game-designing powerhouse like Naughty Dog and received millions from their parent company, you could complain. But if you had any grip on the actual situation of Valve, you'd understand.
Avatar image for After_Math
After_Math

975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 After_Math
Member since 2007 • 975 Posts

[QUOTE="AdoringFan_"]

http://loot-ninja.com/2009/06/09/valve-shuts-out-too-complicated-ps3/

Tssk Tssk.. lazy devs confirmed :evil:

Generalmojo

new Avatar? nice

anyway some1 needs to take these guys down the Sony Santa Monica studios to show them what real devs are 8)

How many amazing games has Sony Santa Monica produced? Two, God of War I, and God of War II. Kinetica wasn't really that great. Warhawk was by Insomniac. Lets look at Valve Half Life, Half Life 2, Half Life Episode 1, Half Life Episode 2, Portal, Counter-Strike, Left 4 Dead, Team Fortress 2, Day of Defeat, etc.
Avatar image for Jared2720
Jared2720

2200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Jared2720
Member since 2007 • 2200 Posts
[QUOTE="Jared2720"]Sounds like some of the employees at Valve need to start taking some classes at Naughty Dog University.Verge_6
...Did you seriously just compare them to a 1st party Sony dev team that receives massive amounts of funding from aforementioned company? Seriously?

I did, yes. Your reading comprehension skills are impressive. Money is irrelevant in this discussion. Money doesn't make people better at making games. It's about the knowledge/talent of those working on the platform. What you're essentially implying is that Sony/Naughty Dog has more talented software engineers. Bear in mind, I'm not talking about game design; that, like money, is irrelevant in this discussion. Naughty Dog has put together perhaps the most technically impressive console game ever made in under two years. Granted, they've had the engine--the one they built from scratch--for quite some time, but that doesn't diminish the fact that they don't seem to be having any problems working within the Playstation 3 architecture like your boys at Valve seems to be having. If Valve is such a remarkable game development company, why are they not investing in people who understand how to do these things. Hence my first post. Thanks. Have a great day.
Avatar image for Dead-Memories
Dead-Memories

6587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 190

User Lists: 0

#61 Dead-Memories
Member since 2008 • 6587 Posts
[QUOTE="BoloTheGreat"][QUOTE="Generalmojo"]

[QUOTE="BoloTheGreat"] Yeah becuase ND created HL, HL2, Portal, TF2 and L4D all of which have recived numerous GOTY awards, especially HL2 and HL which is rearged by some as the greatest game of this decade and HL of the last. Oh wait, they didn't. That was Valve. Valve also created CSS and CS, still 2 of the most popular competative shooters. I think if anyone should be teaching it should be VALVE.

ND created all those games you mentioned above for the PLAYSTATION3? really

Valve have made flat out better games, i think they have earned the right to not make games for a system they see as being unduly difficult to work with.

Valve is one of the top devs, they have the right to do whatever they want in the gaming business.
Avatar image for hy4k
hy4k

1790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 hy4k
Member since 2009 • 1790 Posts
Thats funny, other developers are doing just fine:?-Pred-Alien-
:lol: like the ghostbusters devs. PS3 was their lead platform and it still looks worse
Avatar image for Kashiwaba
Kashiwaba

8059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Kashiwaba
Member since 2005 • 8059 Posts

Another lazy Devs just admit it Fanboys Kojima didnt say its complicated, none of Capcom devs said its complicated , Sony 1st party are making the best games on PS3 this generation without saying its complicated , Sega didnt say its complicated and the list is very long so its obvious they are just too lazy.

Avatar image for out0v0rder
out0v0rder

1994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 out0v0rder
Member since 2006 • 1994 Posts
[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]Well, all the PS3 guys have high end PCs so this really isn't a problem.shaggygrosser
yah, I was under the impression that everyone with a PS3 had gaming-grade PC's, so there's no need for a 360. :lol:

Exactly, the opposite to this is the lemmings can't afford another gaming system because they are poor college frat boys who spent all their money on buying an xbox live subscriptions.
Avatar image for Alpha-Male22
Alpha-Male22

3782

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Alpha-Male22
Member since 2008 • 3782 Posts

They have a legit complaint. They simply dont want to put in the extra effort and time.

I still think that their excuse is weak since many devs manage the PS3, but it's still a legit excuse. They can do whatever they like, Sony's fault for making their PS3 complex

Avatar image for BoloTheGreat
BoloTheGreat

3483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 BoloTheGreat
Member since 2008 • 3483 Posts
All the people griping in here might as well just state that they really have no knowledge of Valve themselves. Their dev team is small, does not recieve nearly as much funding as many 1st party devs do. They do not have the resources, and certainly not the time, to make a different version of every game they have for a console with hardware that they are not comfortable with in terms of the 360 and PC. It is that simple. Maybe if they were a massive game-designing powerhouse like Naughty Dog and received millions from their parent company, you could complain. But if you had any grip on the actual situation of Valve, you'd understand.Verge_6
All the VALVE bashing by fickle cows makes me rather angry, these people built the source engine guys! They made portal, they gave us the orange box for the price of a normal game. THEY INVENTED GORDON FREEMAN! oh and the gravity gun.
Avatar image for danish-death
danish-death

5314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#67 danish-death
Member since 2004 • 5314 Posts
[QUOTE="Dead-Memories"][QUOTE="AdoringFan_"]

http://loot-ninja.com/2009/06/09/valve-shuts-out-too-complicated-ps3/

Tssk Tssk.. lazy devs confirmed :evil:

If they don't want to waste time on trying to figure out the baffling architecture of the PS3 doesn't mean they're lazy, it just means they aren't a fan of wasting time. Valve has usually been good about releasing quality titles in succession. To call them lazy would be ignorant at best, the devs that have actually had the will to ATTEMPT to figure out the ordeal that is the PS3 were usually funded by Sony themselves, so we can expect a lot of this in the future.

MGS4 wasn't founded by Sony. I'm sure other good games havent been either. I can see you point though.
Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="Jared2720"]Sounds like some of the employees at Valve need to start taking some classes at Naughty Dog University.Jared2720
...Did you seriously just compare them to a 1st party Sony dev team that receives massive amounts of funding from aforementioned company? Seriously?

. Money is irrelevant in this discussion.

 Good lord, I am in awe... Money is quite possibly the factor in this situation. I mean...how could you come to the conclusion that it's irrelevant?
Avatar image for rolo107
rolo107

5469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#69 rolo107
Member since 2007 • 5469 Posts

It's official Valve just doesnt have the resources, knowledge or money it takes to be a true developer.

whitetiger3521
Yeah, because creating more than one contender for best game ever doesn't put you in the category of true developer, it puts you in the category of a skilled developer.
Avatar image for Richymisiak
Richymisiak

2589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 Richymisiak
Member since 2007 • 2589 Posts

How many amazing games has Sony Santa Monica produced? Two, God of War I, and God of War II. Kinetica wasn't really that great. Warhawk was by Insomniac. Lets look at Valve Half Life, Half Life 2, Half Life Episode 1, Half Life Episode 2, Portal, Counter-Strike, Left 4 Dead, Team Fortress 2, Day of Defeat, etc.After_Math

you're all forgetting,
ND made crash bandicoot...
CRASH MOTHERF'ING BANDICOOT!

!!!

Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts
Valve games....on consoles >.>
Avatar image for Dead-Memories
Dead-Memories

6587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 190

User Lists: 0

#72 Dead-Memories
Member since 2008 • 6587 Posts

Another lazy Devs just admit it Fanboys Kojima didnt say its complicated, none of Capcom devs said its complicated , Sony 1st party are making the best games on PS3 this generation without saying its complicated , Sega didnt say its complicated and the list is very long so its obvious they are just too lazy.

Kashiwaba
Sony 1st party devs have 4+ years to work with, and internal funding from Sony, Valve doesn't want to waste their time like that, they more productive things to do.
Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts
[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"][QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"]

Awesome, Valve don't expect my money to grace your wallets anytime soon.

You have a PC, why does this news bother you?

It bothers me that I always gave them credit for being some of the best devs around. But at this point in time with the ps3 on the market and they are still unwilling to learn something new? I just think they don't want to be imbarrassed that they can't learn something new. Geez even small no name devs are getting decent games out to the ps3 now. I mean heck can they even make a new game engine? Rumors are that HL3 is just updated Source engine, after how many years. Your right I do own a pc, and also a ps3. I think they need to realise this, believe it or not there is a bunch of us.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#74 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Valve has always hated the PS3. They got some stick up their ass when it comes to learning different processors.

Avatar image for -Pred-Alien-
-Pred-Alien-

1733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 -Pred-Alien-
Member since 2009 • 1733 Posts
[QUOTE="-Pred-Alien-"]Thats funny, other developers are doing just fine:?hy4k
:lol: like the ghostbusters devs. PS3 was their lead platform and it still looks worse

I know and its funny people still claim 360 is tapped out and that the multiplat edge will be lost soon:?
Avatar image for CwlHeddwyn
CwlHeddwyn

5314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 CwlHeddwyn
Member since 2005 • 5314 Posts

Well, all the PS3 guys have high end PCs, so this really isn't a problem.

AAllxxjjnn
lol
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#77 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
How is it lazy when they don't want to develope it? They are possibly losing profits form this.. Thats not laziness.. Thats a business decision.
Avatar image for whitetiger3521
whitetiger3521

4686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#78 whitetiger3521
Member since 2005 • 4686 Posts

[QUOTE="whitetiger3521"]

It's official Valve just doesnt have the resources, knowledge or money it takes to be a true developer.

rolo107

Yeah, because creating more than one contender for best game ever doesn't put you in the category of true developer, it puts you in the category of a skilled developer.

Ya thats right.. Because a true developer can make a game for ANY console

Avatar image for After_Math
After_Math

975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 After_Math
Member since 2007 • 975 Posts
[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="Jared2720"]Sounds like some of the employees at Valve need to start taking some classes at Naughty Dog University.Jared2720
...Did you seriously just compare them to a 1st party Sony dev team that receives massive amounts of funding from aforementioned company? Seriously?

I did, yes. Your reading comprehension skills are impressive. Money is irrelevant in this discussion. Money doesn't make people better at making games. It's about the knowledge/talent of those working on the platform. What you're essentially implying is that Sony/Naughty Dog has more talented software engineers. Bear in mind, I'm not talking about game design; that, like money, is irrelevant in this discussion. Naughty Dog has put together perhaps the most technically impressive console game ever made in under two years. Granted, they've had the engine--the one they built from scratch--for quite some time, but that doesn't diminish the fact that they don't seem to be having any problems working within the Playstation 3 architecture like your boys at Valve seems to be having. If Valve is such a remarkable game development company, why are they not investing in people who understand how to do these things. Hence my first post. Thanks. Have a great day.

Money is relevant, but w/e. Naughtydog is owned by Sony. They have no choice BUT TO work on the PS3. And Valve doesn't want to work on the PS3 because they don't want to waste time, money, and resources learning the architecture, etc. of the PS3. Seems logical to me.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#80 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

Valve has always hated the PS3. They got some stick up their ass when it comes to learning different processors.

Wasdie
Yet they love the Wii?
Avatar image for Dead-Memories
Dead-Memories

6587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 190

User Lists: 0

#81 Dead-Memories
Member since 2008 • 6587 Posts
How is it lazy when they don't want to develope it? They are possibly losing profits form this.. Thats not laziness.. Thats a business decision.sSubZerOo
We should end this thread on this note.
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts

Another lazy Devs just admit it Fanboys Kojima didnt say its complicated, none of Capcom devs said its complicated , Sony 1st party are making the best games on PS3 this generation without saying its complicated , Sega didnt say its complicated and the list is very long so its obvious they are just too lazy.

Kashiwaba

even kojima harped on the PS3. read your stuff. he blamed it for MGS4 falling short of his vision, said he was given conflicting information about what was possible / what the reality was. not that hard to find the interview. after that why don't you read up on the other dozen or more developers that have harped on the PS3 re: memory bottlenecks, overly complicated hardware not meant for gaming (actually designed for medical imaging first and foremost), slow BRD access times, having to make redundent data copies on BRD to compensate, etc, etc, etc. it's all out there, either ignore it and think they're just lazy, or get used to the FACT that the PS3 is unnecessarily complex with little reward to counter-balance the extra effort. 3rd place, smallest install base, some of the worst software sales, and an arrogant executive staff for all countries they operate in. record losses this year, largest in 15+ years... and to this date, despite Tretton saying 'only possible on PS3' we've YET TO SEE a SINGLE game that shows us something that can't be done on the 360.

Avatar image for Dante2710
Dante2710

63164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#83 Dante2710
Member since 2005 • 63164 Posts
*looks at replies* :lol: im speechless honestly and a bit sad......people are actually comparing sony`s developers to valve`s caliber? only in SW
Avatar image for -Pred-Alien-
-Pred-Alien-

1733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 -Pred-Alien-
Member since 2009 • 1733 Posts

[QUOTE="-Pred-Alien-"]

[QUOTE="After_Math"]

QUOTE: The PC and the 360 are just more straightforward. We can focus on what we want to do, which is make game experiences, instead of sweating bullets over obscure architectural decisions they make with their platform. [...] I didn't come into this business in the 90s because of some technical fetish. I came in because I wanted to give people experiences that made them have fun.

Their just saying they just wanna make game expierences. Why should they invest tons of money and learn the PS3 architecture because of Sony's design moves?

3picuri3

They are a small dev (in terms of people working on products) so its understandable, but theres no reason as to why they cant support the PS3 given the money they make

yeah, there's one main reason - SONY ARROGANCE. if you followed this from the beginning that's exactly what this is about. Valve cant be ****** to solve the issues involved with the PS3 considering Sony's closed door development policy for the PS3. simple stuff. it's not like they couldn't do it - they just don't want to because Sony played it incredibly arrogant this gen.

I guess so, but thats mainly due to MSs good thinking, they launched early, took all the crap, launched with better launch titles, had a whole year to build a userbase and library, technology that is powerful but also cost-effective and etc. Sonys arrogance got the better of them as they thought the 360 would be another Dreamcast, but i also think that Sony are now finally out of the woods and the only thing they need to worry about is getting past this recession.

Avatar image for mD-
mD-

4314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 mD-
Member since 2005 • 4314 Posts

Valve can do w/e they want. They want to make good games and coding on the PC/Xbox 360 is the best way for them to do so. I just didn't like when Gabe bashed the PS3 calling it a complete failure and then you see games like Uncharted 2 utilizing w/e power the PS3 has.

Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]How is it lazy when they don't want to develope it? They are possibly losing profits form this.. Thats not laziness.. Thats a business decision.Dead-Memories
We should end this thread on this note.

Bu bu teh naughty dog!!1 :cry:
Avatar image for Kashiwaba
Kashiwaba

8059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Kashiwaba
Member since 2005 • 8059 Posts

[QUOTE="Kashiwaba"]

Another lazy Devs just admit it Fanboys Kojima didnt say its complicated, none of Capcom devs said its complicated , Sony 1st party are making the best games on PS3 this generation without saying its complicated , Sega didnt say its complicated and the list is very long so its obvious they are just too lazy.

Dead-Memories

Sony 1st party devs have 4+ years to work with, and internal funding from Sony, Valve doesn't want to waste their time like that, they more productive things to do.

Capcom , Konami , Sega, Namco , EA games and rockstat do they spend 4+ years with internal funding too admit it lazy ass devs.

Avatar image for Alpha-Male22
Alpha-Male22

3782

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Alpha-Male22
Member since 2008 • 3782 Posts

[QUOTE="rolo107"][QUOTE="whitetiger3521"]

It's official Valve just doesnt have the resources, knowledge or money it takes to be a true developer.

whitetiger3521

Yeah, because creating more than one contender for best game ever doesn't put you in the category of true developer, it puts you in the category of a skilled developer.

Ya thats right.. Because a true developer can make a game for ANY console

That's not true at all, have you ever stopped to think that developing for Sony truly is hard work? It's not that they CAN'T do it, it's that they Haven't done it and they dont want to waste their time trying.
Avatar image for johnnyblazed88
johnnyblazed88

4240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 johnnyblazed88
Member since 2008 • 4240 Posts

wow this thread is on fire ps3 owners really want L4D that bad? its on pc you know

Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts

[QUOTE="3picuri3"]

[QUOTE="-Pred-Alien-"]They are a small dev (in terms of people working on products) so its understandable, but theres no reason as to why they cant support the PS3 given the money they make

-Pred-Alien-

yeah, there's one main reason - SONY ARROGANCE. if you followed this from the beginning that's exactly what this is about. Valve cant be ****** to solve the issues involved with the PS3 considering Sony's closed door development policy for the PS3. simple stuff. it's not like they couldn't do it - they just don't want to because Sony played it incredibly arrogant this gen.

I guess so, but thats mainly due to MSs good thinking, they launched early, took all the crap, launched with better launch titles, had a whole year to build a userbase and library, technology that is powerful but also cost-effective and etc. Sonys arrogance got the better of them as they thought the 360 would be another Dreamcast, but i also think that Sony are now finally out of the woods and the only thing they need to worry about is getting past this recession.

i guess Gabe just takes things personally and holds a grudge *shrugs* i can't say i'd act like he does, but i certainly understand it.
Avatar image for stepat201
stepat201

1979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 stepat201
Member since 2008 • 1979 Posts

It's official Valve just doesnt have the resources, knowledge or money it takes to be a true developer.

whitetiger3521

You're so right! Who cares that they've made what many PC gamers consider to be the best games ever, who cares that they redefined the FPS genre.

They're obviously not a true developer for not wanting to develop on the god-like machine that is the PS3.

Avatar image for -Pred-Alien-
-Pred-Alien-

1733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 -Pred-Alien-
Member since 2009 • 1733 Posts
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Valve has always hated the PS3. They got some stick up their ass when it comes to learning different processors.

sSubZerOo
Yet they love the Wii?

They just said it looked interesting, that was two years ago and no sign of a title or anything, whereas the PS3 had at least Orange Box
Avatar image for mD-
mD-

4314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 mD-
Member since 2005 • 4314 Posts
[QUOTE="Kashiwaba"]

Another lazy Devs just admit it Fanboys Kojima didnt say its complicated, none of Capcom devs said its complicated , Sony 1st party are making the best games on PS3 this generation without saying its complicated , Sega didnt say its complicated and the list is very long so its obvious they are just too lazy.

3picuri3
even kojima harped on the PS3. read your stuff. he blamed it for MGS4 falling short of his vision, said he was given conflicting information about what was possible / what the reality was. not that hard to find the interview. after that why don't you read up on the other dozen or more developers that have harped on the PS3 re: memory bottlenecks, overly complicated hardware not meant for gaming (actually designed for medical imaging first and foremost), slow BRD access times, having to make redundent data copies on BRD to compensate, etc, etc, etc. it's all out there, either ignore it and think they're just lazy, or get used to the FACT that the PS3 is unnecessarily complex with little reward to counter-balance the extra effort. 3rd place, smallest install base, some of the worst software sales, and an arrogant executive staff for all countries they operate in. record losses this year, largest in 15+ years...

OUCH, this post just owned Sony.
Avatar image for standarddamage
standarddamage

1143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 39

User Lists: 0

#94 standarddamage
Member since 2006 • 1143 Posts

I love Valve. They're an excellent company with many quality games an calling them "lazy" is way off base. I'm a little surprised that they won't give the PS3 another try, but they do have a long history of working with Microsoft operating systems, and many of their console efforts have met with great success thanks to it being an easier platform to work with, as well as the quality of the Live!service.

You can bet they're also following the money. If the PS3 was in second or first place in the console wars, they miht be singing a different tune. But as it is they just don't want to mess with a more difficult architecture, smaller install base, and an online service that is still "up and coming." Don't get me wrong, I like PSN, but it still isn't nearly as efficient as Live or PC online.

Avatar image for DerekLoffin
DerekLoffin

9095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#95 DerekLoffin
Member since 2002 • 9095 Posts

Well, all the PS3 guys have high end PCs, so this really isn't a problem.

AAllxxjjnn
High end? Maybe when 360 was released they need high end. Mid end is about all you need to beat the consoles now.
Avatar image for Jared2720
Jared2720

2200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Jared2720
Member since 2007 • 2200 Posts
[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="Jared2720"][QUOTE="Verge_6"] ...Did you seriously just compare them to a 1st party Sony dev team that receives massive amounts of funding from aforementioned company? Seriously?

. Money is irrelevant in this discussion.

 Good lord, I am in awe...

Is that really how you respond to people with whom you're engaging in a debate? In any case, you've obviously missed my point. If money is so important, and Valve has such, as you claim, limited resources, why are they consistently one of the most acclaimed game development companies in the world? Is it magic? Rhetorical. Don't bother. I wouldn't want to leave you in awe again.
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts

[QUOTE="3picuri3"][QUOTE="Kashiwaba"]

Another lazy Devs just admit it Fanboys Kojima didnt say its complicated, none of Capcom devs said its complicated , Sony 1st party are making the best games on PS3 this generation without saying its complicated , Sega didnt say its complicated and the list is very long so its obvious they are just too lazy.

mD-

even kojima harped on the PS3. read your stuff. he blamed it for MGS4 falling short of his vision, said he was given conflicting information about what was possible / what the reality was. not that hard to find the interview. after that why don't you read up on the other dozen or more developers that have harped on the PS3 re: memory bottlenecks, overly complicated hardware not meant for gaming (actually designed for medical imaging first and foremost), slow BRD access times, having to make redundent data copies on BRD to compensate, etc, etc, etc. it's all out there, either ignore it and think they're just lazy, or get used to the FACT that the PS3 is unnecessarily complex with little reward to counter-balance the extra effort. 3rd place, smallest install base, some of the worst software sales, and an arrogant executive staff for all countries they operate in. record losses this year, largest in 15+ years...

OUCH, this post just owned Sony.

i'm not saying the PS3 is crap, it's actually very very similar to the 360 in terms of what it can do - i'm just trying to explain why the lazy dev comment is nonsense. you have to weight the costs against the rewards - and the extra effort just doesn't make sense for some developers.

what makes more sense? valve dedicating a small team to learning the PS3 in & out, taking them away from other projects - or taking a pass to send a signal to Sony? if I was in Gabe's position i'd absolutely outsource the work instead of taking my staff away. Sony wanted to be different this gen, now they're learning the cost of doing so with less 3rd party support,

Avatar image for BoloTheGreat
BoloTheGreat

3483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#98 BoloTheGreat
Member since 2008 • 3483 Posts
*looks at replies* :lol: im speechless honestly and a bit sad......people are actually comparing sony`s developers to valve`s caliber? only in SW Dante2710
This is an example of why the PS3 community tends to be a tincy bit looked down upon, they jump on anyone who does anything against their world view. This is Vale people FREAKING VALVE! you know, HL, CS, CSS, HL, TF2, Portal, HL2; episodes, L4D. Has almost single-handedly revolutionised DD on the PC. Gives epic support to modders, even inviting team dystopia to their HQ for a week to use their stuff free of charge? Any of this ringing a bell?
Avatar image for After_Math
After_Math

975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 After_Math
Member since 2007 • 975 Posts
[QUOTE="Richymisiak"][QUOTE="After_Math"] How many amazing games has Sony Santa Monica produced? Two, God of War I, and God of War II. Kinetica wasn't really that great. Warhawk was by Insomniac. Lets look at Valve Half Life, Half Life 2, Half Life Episode 1, Half Life Episode 2, Portal, Counter-Strike, Left 4 Dead, Team Fortress 2, Day of Defeat, etc.

you're all forgetting, ND make crash bandicoot... CRASH MOTHERF'ING BANDICOOT! !!!

Naughtydog has been my favorite console developer for the last three generations. I own every Crash Bandicoot they made, and every Jak and Daxter they made. (Crash 1 through CTR, and Jak and Daxter to Jak X). Naughtydog isn't SCE's Santa Monica Stuidio. They are set in Santa Monica, but they don't make games with Santa Monica Studios.
Avatar image for whitetiger3521
whitetiger3521

4686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#100 whitetiger3521
Member since 2005 • 4686 Posts

That's not true at all, have you ever stopped to think that developing for Sony truly is hard work? It's not that they CAN'T do it, it's that they Haven't done it and they dont want to waste their time trying.Alpha-Male22

Ya they dont want to make a crappy game and make themselves look bad :lol: They dont got the skillz to make a PS3 game or they would be developing a badass game right now for it. But instead they wanna be little cry babies and say it's too complicated.