Wa- Wait a minute.What advantage do consoles get over PC except exclusives? Any?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Another48hours
Another48hours

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 Another48hours
Member since 2012 • 1970 Posts

I mean yes, we can argue about stuff about graphics, or brands loyalty, nostalgia, upsaling, Onlive, and etc. etc etc.

But there is one real question to be asked. other than exclusive what advantage does a console have over a PC? Is that it? Because with games going more multiplat (which is bad for the industry, but that's another issue) soon consoles will have less and less exclusives.

You can't say controller when a 3rd or FP company can just make one for Ps3 as we all already know or/and have used.

You can't say lower quality graphics because Pcgames released this gen showed it could do both.

You can't say simplicity because Laptops and Onlive can do it.

You can't say compatability, especially for this gen with glitches, texture problems, Dlc having to not be on the disc, etc.

You can't say only controller support because consoles have M/K controls as well as the Wii controller which is a sensor stick with buttons. Not the first.

You can't say online network because, well drugs are bad for you.

You can't say you can;t play on your TV or sit on your couch.

You can't say easier to carry. Laptops and Onlive are easy to carry.

You can't say it has less genere variety.

You cant say consoles have more genres.

You can't say punch a turtle.

You can rub the turtle. But does the turtle want you to?

You probably can say lack of japanese support but that's not exactly a very large impact on buying. But it's the only of 2 real advantages.

The only things you could say is that Consoles (except the upcoming gen from specs) Usually have a temp, advantage in games over Pc at the start of each gen because they are build for games, but this is temp and, very fast might I add, Pc widens that gap at a point.

So really, unless I am missing something, am I only seeing one advantage?

(I am not primarily a PC gamer so don't think I am one of those SW elitists.)

Avatar image for turtlethetaffer
turtlethetaffer

18973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 144

User Lists: 0

#2 turtlethetaffer
Member since 2009 • 18973 Posts

Well... it's convenient as well. I like consoles better.

Avatar image for Another48hours
Another48hours

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 Another48hours
Member since 2012 • 1970 Posts

Well... it's convenient as well. I like consoles better.

turtlethetaffer
I knew the turtle would post first. Also, more convenient?
Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
Convenience and simplicity, there is no thought involved when setting up a console. You plug it into the outlet/tv, pop in the disc, and you're done.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts
  1. Simplicity
  2. Compatability
  3. 100% controller support (it seems to be an important issue in SW)
  4. Exclusive games

These are the ones I could come up with off the top of my head.

Avatar image for Another48hours
Another48hours

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 Another48hours
Member since 2012 • 1970 Posts
Convenience and simplicity, there is no thought involved when setting up a console. You plug it into the outlet/tv, pop in the disc, and you're done.meetroid8
You can do that with Laptops and Onlive to.
Avatar image for Another48hours
Another48hours

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 Another48hours
Member since 2012 • 1970 Posts
  1. Simplicity
  2. Compatability
  3. 100% controller support (it seems to be an important issue in SW)
  4. Exclusive games

These are the ones I could come up with off the top of my head.

lundy86_4
1.Elaborate 2.Elaborate 3.what? 4.Already covered.
Avatar image for Nfan89
Nfan89

57

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 Nfan89
Member since 2012 • 57 Posts
To each is own. I can defend and attack every system ever made. It comes down to the games and what the person is looking for in a system.
Avatar image for turtlethetaffer
turtlethetaffer

18973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 144

User Lists: 0

#9 turtlethetaffer
Member since 2009 • 18973 Posts

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]

Well... it's convenient as well. I like consoles better.

Another48hours

I knew the turtle would post first. Also, more convenient?

How did you know that? Oh well I'm bored right now. :P

Anyways yeah I jsut think it's more convenient, since you won't have to worry about whether or not your system can run a game or not. Everything on consoles are optomized.

Avatar image for Darkslayer16
Darkslayer16

3619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Darkslayer16
Member since 2006 • 3619 Posts

Most people have more friends that play on consoles so buying a PC and playing multiplayer / co-op wouldn't be as fun.

Avatar image for YoshiYogurt
YoshiYogurt

6008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 YoshiYogurt
Member since 2010 • 6008 Posts
Simplicity. Nothing beats sticking in a game with no issues, but on the PC side nothing beats high resolutions, great textures, better prices, and mouse/kb
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

  1. Simplicity
  2. Compatability
  3. 100% controller support (it seems to be an important issue in SW)
  4. Exclusive games

These are the ones I could come up with off the top of my head.

Another48hours

1.Elaborate 2.Elaborate 3.what? 4.Already covered.

  1. Simplicity - GUI is far simpler, plug and play is far better (PC's are still behind, but getting better), as a machine, it is far simpler to use.
  2. Compatability - Games for the system are 100% compatable. PC games can occasionally have issues. I am not saying console games are without major issues, however they are far less common.
  3. 100% controller support - Duh. Games have 100% gamepad support. I'm surprised this was difficult to understand.
  4. Exclusive games - I'm aware. I felt reiteration was necessary.
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#13 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
the console peasant argument of "convenience and simplicity" boils down to "i am a lazy bastard that doesn't mind paying money for the worst experience so long as it's handed to me pre-assembled" lol
Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
[QUOTE="meetroid8"]Convenience and simplicity, there is no thought involved when setting up a console. You plug it into the outlet/tv, pop in the disc, and you're done.Another48hours
You can do that with Laptops and Onlive to.

But a Laptop can't play any game you want.
Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#15 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

  1. Simplicity
  2. Compatability
  3. 100% controller support (it seems to be an important issue in SW)
  4. Exclusive games

These are the ones I could come up with off the top of my head.

Another48hours

1.Elaborate 2.Elaborate 3.what? 4.Already covered.

Well if you are going to pull the denial and argument card in the face of reasons and logic, then this thread already seems like a giant waste of time.

Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#16 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts

Most people have more friends that play on consoles so buying a PC and playing multiplayer / co-op wouldn't be as fun.

Darkslayer16
Source?
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

the console peasant argument of "convenience and simplicity" boils down to "i am a lazy bastard that doesn't mind paying money for the worst experience so long as it's handed to me pre-assembled" lolprinceofshapeir

No.

It boils down to "this is what I am happy with. F*ck off!"

I'm not even a "console peasant" and I find it easy enough to understand.

Avatar image for Another48hours
Another48hours

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 Another48hours
Member since 2012 • 1970 Posts

[QUOTE="Another48hours"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

  1. Simplicity
  2. Compatability
  3. 100% controller support (it seems to be an important issue in SW)
  4. Exclusive games

These are the ones I could come up with off the top of my head.

lundy86_4

1.Elaborate 2.Elaborate 3.what? 4.Already covered.

  1. Simplicity - GUI is far simpler, plug and play is far better (PC's are still behind, but getting better), as a machine, it is far simpler to use.
  2. Compatability - Games for the system are 100% compatable. PC games can occasionally have issues.
  3. 100% controller support - Duh. Games have 100% gamepad support. I'm surprised this was difficult to understand.
  4. Exclusive games - I'm aware. I felt reiteration was necessary.

1. Onlive, Laptops 2.Onlive. Plus some games have texture problems all the time on Systems this gen as well as others. 3.Some have Waggle, some have M/K controls to. It's false. 4.Ok.
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#19 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="Another48hours"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

  1. Simplicity
  2. Compatability
  3. 100% controller support (it seems to be an important issue in SW)
  4. Exclusive games

These are the ones I could come up with off the top of my head.

lundy86_4

1.Elaborate 2.Elaborate 3.what? 4.Already covered.

  1. Simplicity - GUI is far simpler, plug and play is far better (PC's are still behind, but getting better), as a machine, it is far simpler to use.
  2. Compatability - Games for the system are 100% compatable. PC games can occasionally have issues.
  3. 100% controller support - Duh. Games have 100% gamepad support. I'm surprised this was difficult to understand.
  4. Exclusive games - I'm aware. I felt reiteration was necessary.

1. see above post

2. we are witnessing consoles abandon backwards compatibility and with next-gen it's doubtful it will even be a feature for the PS4 or xbox 720. the PC is the only platform with true universal backwards compatibility.

3. a wired 360 controller works with 99% of games today and is plug-and-play, and anyway KB/M is superior for FPS, RTS, MMO, or really any shooter based on aiming a reticule

4. there are more exclusive games on PC and a greater variety of exclusive games on PC

Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#20 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts
  • Easier to carry from one room to the living room (good for my puny kiddie console body)
  • Easier to set up and free from drivers etc (good for my puny kiddie console brain)
Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#21 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts
The only advantage I see is convenience and more Japanese developer support. Although sometimes it is more convenient to play on PC rather than consoles. So I guess convenience depends on the game actually. Japanese support is a factual advantage. And that is about it.
Avatar image for Another48hours
Another48hours

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 Another48hours
Member since 2012 • 1970 Posts
  • Easier to carry from one room to the living room (good for my puny kiddie console body)
  • Easier to set up and free from drivers etc (good for my puny kiddie console brain)
-Unreal-
Laptops and Onlive hurt both your arguments.
Avatar image for crimsonman1245
crimsonman1245

4253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 crimsonman1245
Member since 2011 • 4253 Posts

I dont need a nuclear engine to play games, you want one? Awesome, more power to you.

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#24 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]the console peasant argument of "convenience and simplicity" boils down to "i am a lazy bastard that doesn't mind paying money for the worst experience so long as it's handed to me pre-assembled" lollundy86_4

No.

It boils down to "this is what I am happy with. F*ck off!"

I'm not even a "console peasant" and I find it easy enough to understand.

no, it boils down to "i don't like to put in the work to have a superior entertainment system. i want things pre-assembled for my puny little babby brain." such is the console pleb logic.
Avatar image for sandbox3d
sandbox3d

5166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 sandbox3d
Member since 2010 • 5166 Posts

None. Nothing at all. PC can do everything consoles can do and sooooo much more.

That said, I do prefer console gaming because that is were most of my favorite franchises happen to be. All about preference, but objectively the PC destroys all consoles combined.

Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#26 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts

I like consoles the most, trust me, that's the biggest advantage consoles get.

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52546 Posts
[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]the console peasant argument of "convenience and simplicity" boils down to "i am a lazy bastard that doesn't mind paying money for the worst experience so long as it's handed to me pre-assembled" lolprinceofshapeir

No.

It boils down to "this is what I am happy with. F*ck off!"

I'm not even a "console peasant" and I find it easy enough to understand.

no, it boils down to "i don't like to put in the work to have a superior entertainment system. i want things pre-assembled for my puny little babby brain." such is the console pleb logic.

lol silly man
Avatar image for Rocker6
Rocker6

13358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Rocker6
Member since 2009 • 13358 Posts

The only undisputable advanage that consoles have over PCs for average gamers is the simplicity and convinience,you just plug in and play,completely "foolproof"...

Another possible advantage could be their smaller size,however Mini-ITX PC cases and gaming laptops make that a moot point to discuss...

Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#29 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts
[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]
  • Easier to carry from one room to the living room (good for my puny kiddie console body)
  • Easier to set up and free from drivers etc (good for my puny kiddie console brain)
Another48hours
Laptops and Onlive hurt both your arguments.

lol gaming on a laptop. lol onlatency
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#30 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

No.

It boils down to "this is what I am happy with. F*ck off!"

I'm not even a "console peasant" and I find it easy enough to understand.

freedomfreak

no, it boils down to "i don't like to put in the work to have a superior entertainment system. i want things pre-assembled for my puny little babby brain." such is the console pleb logic.

lol silly man

silly pleb

Avatar image for MacBoomStick
MacBoomStick

1822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 MacBoomStick
Member since 2011 • 1822 Posts

I think the only advantage is popularity. I know that PC is the highest grossing market and everything but consoles just seem to be more popular. If your friends have a 360 and you don't have anything, then you might buy a 360.

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52546 Posts

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] no, it boils down to "i don't like to put in the work to have a superior entertainment system. i want things pre-assembled for my puny little babby brain." such is the console pleb logic.princeofshapeir

lol silly man

silly pleb

lol
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="Another48hours"] 1.Elaborate 2.Elaborate 3.what? 4.Already covered.Another48hours

  1. Simplicity - GUI is far simpler, plug and play is far better (PC's are still behind, but getting better), as a machine, it is far simpler to use.
  2. Compatability - Games for the system are 100% compatable. PC games can occasionally have issues.
  3. 100% controller support - Duh. Games have 100% gamepad support. I'm surprised this was difficult to understand.
  4. Exclusive games - I'm aware. I felt reiteration was necessary.

1. Onlive, Laptops 2.Onlive. Plus some games have texture problems all the time on Systems this gen as well as others. 3.Some have Waggle, some have M/K controls to. It's false. 4.Ok.

  1. Laptops don't address any of the reasons stated under simplicity. They operate using the same OS as a fully-fledged desktop. OnLive has a whole other slew of issues, but they lack games one can find, even on the PC.
  2. See above. Compatability is there, yes. We were talking specifically PC though, and although OnLive falls under that umbrella it's lacks many of the advantages. Many which you will no doubt show as absolutely mandatory for any gamer.
  3. So? They still have 100% controller support. F*cking stupid argument is stupid. BTW, when we specifically talk controller support, we talk about the native controller support, so the WiiMote is included. Duh.
Avatar image for Another48hours
Another48hours

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 Another48hours
Member since 2012 • 1970 Posts

The only undisputable advanage that consoles have over PCs for average gamers is the simplicity and convinience,you just plug in and play,completely "foolproof"...

Another possible advantage could be their smaller size,however Mini-ITX PC cases make that a moot point to discuss...

Rocker6
Laptops and Onlive. Already covered in TC.
Avatar image for Eponique
Eponique

17918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#35 Eponique
Member since 2007 • 17918 Posts

Uhm I think exclusives are a good enough reason but maybe that's just me.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#36 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

no, it boils down to "i don't like to put in the work to have a superior entertainment system. i want things pre-assembled for my puny little babby brain." such is the console pleb logic.princeofshapeir

It's clear that this will continue to go around in circles. Stop inserting ridiculous insults in your posts. Choice of machine is not based on the intellectual. Unless you can prove it.

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52546 Posts

Uhm I think exclusives are a good enough reason but maybe that's just me.

Eponique
DUDE YOU BUY SYSTEMS FOR GAMES? WTF?
Avatar image for WarTornRuston
WarTornRuston

2712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 WarTornRuston
Member since 2011 • 2712 Posts

Well.........

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#39 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]no, it boils down to "i don't like to put in the work to have a superior entertainment system. i want things pre-assembled for my puny little babby brain." such is the console pleb logic.lundy86_4

It's clear that this will continue to go around in circles. Stop inserting ridiculous insults in your posts. Choice of machine is not based on the intellectual. Unless you can prove it.

the convenience argument holds zero water if you're someone who has any interest in creating a superior entertainment system it doesn't make any sense as to why you'd be fine paying money for an inferior experience when you could do some research online and build a better experience on your own if you legitimately cannot do that, then yes, you are a technophobe or lazy
Avatar image for Another48hours
Another48hours

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#40 Another48hours
Member since 2012 • 1970 Posts

[QUOTE="Another48hours"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

  1. Simplicity - GUI is far simpler, plug and play is far better (PC's are still behind, but getting better), as a machine, it is far simpler to use.
  2. Compatability - Games for the system are 100% compatable. PC games can occasionally have issues.
  3. 100% controller support - Duh. Games have 100% gamepad support. I'm surprised this was difficult to understand.
  4. Exclusive games - I'm aware. I felt reiteration was necessary.

lundy86_4

1. Onlive, Laptops 2.Onlive. Plus some games have texture problems all the time on Systems this gen as well as others. 3.Some have Waggle, some have M/K controls to. It's false. 4.Ok.

  1. Laptops don't address any of the reasons stated under simplicity. They operate using the same OS as a fully-fledged desktop. OnLive has a whole other slew of issues, but they lack games one can find, even on the PC.
  2. See above. Compatability is there, yes. We were talking specifically PC though, and although OnLive falls under that umbrella it's lacks many of the advantages. Many which you will no doubt show as absolutely mandatory for any gamer.
  3. So? They still have 100% controller support. F*cking stupid argument is stupid. BTW, when we specifically talk controller support, we talk about the native controller support, so the WiiMote is included. Duh.

1.Yet, some are simpler to use than others. Cvs type laptops and Netbooks come tomind. Plus, Onlive. Regardless of issues, it's still simpler to use. Console have issues to. 2.Laptops, Onlive, Steam. Also,it still has less Copatibility issues than Consoles regradlessif you hate on Onlive or not. Adding side things does not change the rule. 3. So? With that logic PC is 100% controller support as well. The fact is consoles are not 100% controller support. Where's that controllerfor Kinect at for example? What about the M/K add-ons? If you are talking native, why does Kinect have no Native controller support?
Avatar image for Another48hours
Another48hours

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 Another48hours
Member since 2012 • 1970 Posts

Uhm I think exclusives are a good enough reason but maybe that's just me.

Eponique
Already covered.
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#42 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
if exclusives were a sufficient reason to own a system nobody would own a 360. lol
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

the convenience argument holds zero water if you're someone who has any interest in creating a superior entertainment system it doesn't make any sense as to why you'd be fine paying money for an inferior experience when you could do some research online and build a better experience on your own if you legitimately cannot do that, then yes, you are a technophobe or lazyprinceofshapeir

Well, obviously. People do not look for the same factors in everything.

I said it wasn't an indication of the level of intelligence, not whether you are a technophobe or lazy. Technophobia is the fear of technological devices, which makes no sense if they are willing to use one technological device over the other. I don't see how it's laziness either, especially when there are so many variables in what people want from a gaming machine.

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52546 Posts
if exclusives were a sufficient reason to own a system nobody would own a 360. lolprinceofshapeir
Already covered.
Avatar image for Eponique
Eponique

17918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#45 Eponique
Member since 2007 • 17918 Posts

DUDE YOU BUY SYSTEMS FOR GAMES? WTF?freedomfreak

.

I bought this game for the gameplay.

I'm doomed to be a console peasant for the rest of my life.

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52546 Posts

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]DUDE YOU BUY SYSTEMS FOR GAMES? WTF?Eponique

I bought this game for the gameplay.

I'm doomed to be a console peasant for the rest of my life.


That's sad,man.

Stop buying games for gameplay.
That's just silly.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#47 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts
Honestly, it's just the exclusive games, and the fact that I'm too lazy to build and maintain a gaming PC.
Avatar image for _Cadbury_
_Cadbury_

2936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#48 _Cadbury_
Member since 2006 • 2936 Posts
I know everything released on it will work on it. I don't have to put any effort into it. And you act like exclusives is a negligible reason, I'd say it's a pretty big one considering gaming is about, you know, having fun playing the games you want to play. Now to sit back and watch the hermits tell everyone they aren't allowed to prefer consoles for the reasons they give.
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#49 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
and the fact that I'm too lazy to build and maintain a gaming PC.charizard1605
behold
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

1.Yet, some are simpler to use than others. Cvs type laptops and Netbooks come tomind. Plus, Onlive. Regardless of issues, it's still simpler to use. Console have issues to. 2.Laptops, Onlive, Steam. Also,it still has less Copatibility issues than Consoles regradlessif you hate on Onlive or not. Adding side things does not change the rule. 3. So? With that logic PC is 100% controller support as well. The fact is consoles are not 100% controller support. Where's that controllerfor Kinect at for example? What about the M/K add-ons? If you are talking native, why does Kinect have no Native controller support?Another48hours

  1. You use netbooks as an indication of simplicity and yet we're referencing PC in terms of gaming. What? Consoles are easier to use than PCs, end of. OnLive is easier to use, and much more in line with consoles, yep. It also doesn't represent a fraction of the advantages of PC gaming. In fact, it has far more in common with console gaming.
  2. PC gaming overall is has more compatability issues. You seem to want to stand in OnLive when its convenient, but use other PC services when they are convenient as well. If we look at them overall, PCs have far more software incompatability than consoles. Right or wrong?
  3. All consoles games work with the gamepad for that system (apart from a few Wii games I believe). PCs have 100% M/KB support, with minimal controller support (much more popular lately, though). Consoles have nigh on 100% controller support, with minimal M/KB support.