what has better technical graphics

Fable 2 is not even in the top 5.

I posted this in another thread, but I guess I have to do it again.

Ok here it comes. Everything is on very high with no AA at 1400 x 900.

Guys remember no AA's. So edges look crappy.

This here is the greatest shot in crysis IMO

This is me climbing a ladder

Me modifying my weapon

Looking at some trees

Crysis probably has the best characters models in gaming

Looking at dead people

Ok im done. Without a doubt crysis is the best looking game right now, and will be in 08 if crysis 2 doesn't come out by then. Sorry guys fable 2 stood no chance.

1. do you even know what supersampling is, or what it does, or did you just find that word somewhere on google?

2. why hasnt this thread been locked yet for stupidity?

3. have you seen Peter Molyneux' GDC presentation? the fighting in that game is the worst ive ever seen

WARxSnake

1. Rendering in higher resolutions internally, and downscaling to the native monitor resolution you choose, right ? That is how ALL those great looking Crysis pics were taken, but without supersampling you can't ever play the game looking that way

2. Because in the Fable 2 pic i posted, graphics look 100% comparable if not better in some ways to Crysis BEST pics in here, even the not in game ones

3. The presentation was a show of the co-op, was not meant to show how graphics are, the forest pic posted in the site is a near finalised in graphics area, and the game WILL look a lot better than that by release of course

As for the combat, Fable 1 was great fun to play, and one of the best 100% real time combat systems in any RPG to date, so why do you think Fable 2 will be worst ? Because of some seconds you show in the co-op presentation ?

The above Crysis pics look totally mediocre as well, why do poeple take THAT bad pics, can't toy enable some more AA for christ ?

[QUOTE="WARxSnake"]

1. do you even know what supersampling is, or what it does, or did you just find that word somewhere on google?

2. why hasnt this thread been locked yet for stupidity?

3. have you seen Peter Molyneux' GDC presentation? the fighting in that game is the worst ive ever seen

saolin323

1. Rendering in higher resolutions internally, and downscaling to the native monitor resolution you choose, right ? That is how ALL those great looking Crysis pics were taken, but without supersampling you can't ever play the game looking that way

2. Because in the Fable 2 pic i posted, graphics look 100% comparable if not better in some ways to Crysis BEST pics in here, even the not in game ones

3. The presentation was a show of the co-op, was not meant to show how graphics are, the forest pic posted in the site is a near finalised in graphics area, and the game WILL look a lot better than that by release of course

As for the combat, Fable 1 was great fun to play, and one of the best 100% real time combat systems in any RPG to date, so why do you think Fable 2 will be worst ? Because of some seconds you show in the co-op presentation ?

Sorry Fable fanboy....Fable 2 isnt even top 5 graphically.

[QUOTE="saolin323"][QUOTE="WARxSnake"]

1. do you even know what supersampling is, or what it does, or did you just find that word somewhere on google?

2. why hasnt this thread been locked yet for stupidity?

3. have you seen Peter Molyneux' GDC presentation? the fighting in that game is the worst ive ever seen

Uptown

1. Rendering in higher resolutions internally, and downscaling to the native monitor resolution you choose, right ? That is how ALL those great looking Crysis pics were taken, but without supersampling you can't ever play the game looking that way

2. Because in the Fable 2 pic i posted, graphics look 100% comparable if not better in some ways to Crysis BEST pics in here, even the not in game ones

3. The presentation was a show of the co-op, was not meant to show how graphics are, the forest pic posted in the site is a near finalised in graphics area, and the game WILL look a lot better than that by release of course

As for the combat, Fable 1 was great fun to play, and one of the best 100% real time combat systems in any RPG to date, so why do you think Fable 2 will be worst ? Because of some seconds you show in the co-op presentation ?

Sorry Fable fanboy....Fable 2 isnt even top 5 graphically.

It is 2ond, after Crysis IMO

[QUOTE="Uptown"][QUOTE="saolin323"][QUOTE="WARxSnake"]

1. do you even know what supersampling is, or what it does, or did you just find that word somewhere on google?

2. why hasnt this thread been locked yet for stupidity?

3. have you seen Peter Molyneux' GDC presentation? the fighting in that game is the worst ive ever seen

saolin323

1. Rendering in higher resolutions internally, and downscaling to the native monitor resolution you choose, right ? That is how ALL those great looking Crysis pics were taken, but without supersampling you can't ever play the game looking that way

2. Because in the Fable 2 pic i posted, graphics look 100% comparable if not better in some ways to Crysis BEST pics in here, even the not in game ones

3. The presentation was a show of the co-op, was not meant to show how graphics are, the forest pic posted in the site is a near finalised in graphics area, and the game WILL look a lot better than that by release of course

As for the combat, Fable 1 was great fun to play, and one of the best 100% real time combat systems in any RPG to date, so why do you think Fable 2 will be worst ? Because of some seconds you show in the co-op presentation ?

Sorry Fable fanboy....Fable 2 isnt even top 5 graphically.

It is 2ond, after Crysis IMO

Wrong.

1. Crysis
2. Killzone 2
3. Gran Turismo 5
4. Resident Evil 5
5. Gears of War 2 (If the tech demo is anything to base of what is to come)

[QUOTE="saolin323"][QUOTE="Uptown"][QUOTE="saolin323"][QUOTE="WARxSnake"]

1. do you even know what supersampling is, or what it does, or did you just find that word somewhere on google?

2. why hasnt this thread been locked yet for stupidity?

3. have you seen Peter Molyneux' GDC presentation? the fighting in that game is the worst ive ever seen

Uptown

1. Rendering in higher resolutions internally, and downscaling to the native monitor resolution you choose, right ? That is how ALL those great looking Crysis pics were taken, but without supersampling you can't ever play the game looking that way

2. Because in the Fable 2 pic i posted, graphics look 100% comparable if not better in some ways to Crysis BEST pics in here, even the not in game ones

3. The presentation was a show of the co-op, was not meant to show how graphics are, the forest pic posted in the site is a near finalised in graphics area, and the game WILL look a lot better than that by release of course

As for the combat, Fable 1 was great fun to play, and one of the best 100% real time combat systems in any RPG to date, so why do you think Fable 2 will be worst ? Because of some seconds you show in the co-op presentation ?

Sorry Fable fanboy....Fable 2 isnt even top 5 graphically.

It is 2ond, after Crysis IMO

Wrong.

1. Crysis
2. Killzone 2
3. Gran Turismo 5
4. Resident Evil 5
5. Gears of War 2 (If the tech demo is anything to base of what is to come)

You forgot Alan Wake, and far cry 2 for PC.

To the 25 people who put Fable 2: its amazing you idiots have brains that let you breath and type simultaneously.

You have to be knee deep in Peter Moleneux's inflated sense of self-esteem to ignore the fact that Crysis is developed by Crytek and hence is the best looking game ever made for us punters. Not just the textures, Crysis technically is impossible to max out on the very highest setting, how the hell does Fable 2 come close???? dream on lemmings, have fun in '08 with 0 AAAE

[QUOTE="saolin323"]

Always keep in mind, Crysis is a final optimised game, Fable 2 pic will get 9 more months of work until release

But Fable 2 light beams, shadows and detail is definatly way ahead IMO, and is a given, Crysis is old now, Fable 2 is coming later, so was a given that would look far better

Rougehunter

Anyway, Crysis looks better.

[QUOTE="Rougehunter"][QUOTE="saolin323"]

Always keep in mind, Crysis is a final optimised game, Fable 2 pic will get 9 more months of work until release

But Fable 2 light beams, shadows and detail is definatly way ahead IMO, and is a given, Crysis is old now, Fable 2 is coming later, so was a given that would look far better

EuroMafia

Anyway, Crysis looks better.

Wrong.

1. Crysis
2. Killzone 2
3. Gran Turismo 5
4. Resident Evil 5
5. Gears of War 2 (If the tech demo is anything to base of what is to come)

not even close to 2nd.

Uptown

Don't know if its better than those console games, but STALKER Clear Sky is also very good

This is the funniest **** I have ever seen. People who think fable2 on a technical stand point is better than crysis are just crazy. Also if some of oyu are going by this. Then GTA5 must be better on a more technical standpoint then Forza2 even though forza2 as some of the most advanced phisycs in a a car game while GTA5 has barely any.Killfox

Crysis: looks good...Only vegetation,no imagination,generic tropical island

Fable 2;immersive world,better art.

Im gonna prefer how Fable 2 looks but Crysis easily wins in the technical departement

[QUOTE="Killfox"]This is the funniest **** I have ever seen. People who think fable2 on a technical stand point is better than crysis are just crazy. Also if some of oyu are going by this. Then GTA5 must be better on a more technical standpoint then Forza2 even though forza2 as some of the most advanced phisycs in a a car game while GTA5 has barely any.ProductNumber49

Crysis: looks good...Only vegetation,no imagination,generic tropical island

Fable 2;immersive world,better art.

Im gonna prefer how Fable 2 looks but Crysis easily wins in the technical departement

[QUOTE="Killfox"]This is the funniest **** I have ever seen. People who think fable2 on a technical stand point is better than crysis are just crazy. Also if some of oyu are going by this. Then GTA5 must be better on a more technical standpoint then Forza2 even though forza2 as some of the most advanced phisycs in a a car game while GTA5 has barely any.ProductNumber49

Crysis: looks good...Only vegetation,no imagination,generic tropical island

Fable 2;immersive world,better art.

Im gonna prefer how Fable 2 looks but Crysis easily wins in the technical departement

crysis is the most advanced game around at the min..

fable looks good for a console game though..

Always keep in mind, Crysis is a final optimised game, Fable 2 pic will get 9 more months of work until release

But Fable 2 light beams, shadows and detail is definatly way ahead IMO, and is a given, Crysis is old now, Fable 2 is coming later, so was a given that would look far better

saolin323

Can plants in Fable 2 move according to wind??

Can water ripples move according 2 wind in Fable 2?

Can smoke and fire move according to wind in Fable 2?

Can you shoot at trees and break down trees in Fable 2?

Can plants be moved when you walk through them in Fable 2?

Does Fable 2 have volumetric 3D clouds that move according 2 wind?

Does Fable 2 have advanced character models??

Does Fable 2 have photorealistic graphics? (even fantasy can be photorealistic,like LOTR movie so dont say its not meant to be photorealistic)

Man im tired of counting downa and i didnt mention even 2% of stuff you can do in Crysis.

And final version of Fable 2 WILL LOOK WORSE (and btw. those pictures you show us arent INGAME) because of optimisation and such.

Something like MOTORSTORM.Look at final version of it.And now look what they said it will look like.

It is called COMERCIALS.And i see that this FABLE 2 fanboy fell for it.

Wrong.

1. Crysis
2. Killzone 2
3. Gran Turismo 5
4. Resident Evil 5
5. Gears of War 2 (If the tech demo is anything to base of what is to come)

not even close to 2nd. Uptown

You HAVE to be kidding, those games are MILES behind Fable 2 and Crysis, none even has volumetric lighting

[QUOTE="Uptown"][QUOTE="saolin323"][QUOTE="Uptown"][QUOTE="saolin323"][QUOTE="WARxSnake"]

1. do you even know what supersampling is, or what it does, or did you just find that word somewhere on google?

2. why hasnt this thread been locked yet for stupidity?

3. have you seen Peter Molyneux' GDC presentation? the fighting in that game is the worst ive ever seen

saolin323

1. Rendering in higher resolutions internally, and downscaling to the native monitor resolution you choose, right ? That is how ALL those great looking Crysis pics were taken, but without supersampling you can't ever play the game looking that way

2. Because in the Fable 2 pic i posted, graphics look 100% comparable if not better in some ways to Crysis BEST pics in here, even the not in game ones

3. The presentation was a show of the co-op, was not meant to show how graphics are, the forest pic posted in the site is a near finalised in graphics area, and the game WILL look a lot better than that by release of course

As for the combat, Fable 1 was great fun to play, and one of the best 100% real time combat systems in any RPG to date, so why do you think Fable 2 will be worst ? Because of some seconds you show in the co-op presentation ?

Sorry Fable fanboy....Fable 2 isnt even top 5 graphically.

It is 2ond, after Crysis IMO

Wrong.

1. Crysis
2. Killzone 2
3. Gran Turismo 5
4. Resident Evil 5
5. Gears of War 2 (If the tech demo is anything to base of what is to come)

not even close to 2nd.

You HAVE to be kidding, those games are MILES behind Fable 2 and Crysis, none even has volumetric lighting

[QUOTE="ProductNumber49"]

[QUOTE="Killfox"]This is the funniest **** I have ever seen. People who think fable2 on a technical stand point is better than crysis are just crazy. Also if some of oyu are going by this. Then GTA5 must be better on a more technical standpoint then Forza2 even though forza2 as some of the most advanced phisycs in a a car game while GTA5 has barely any.Lonelynight

Crysis: looks good...Only vegetation,no imagination,generic tropical island

Fable 2;immersive world,better art.

Im gonna prefer how Fable 2 looks but Crysis easily wins in the technical departement

Absolutely agree.BTW this FABLE 2 fanboy is posting BEST fable prerendered screenshots.And not so good medium to high Crysis screnshoots.

Here is one INGAME screenshot of Crysis.

ANHD CORE LEVEL IS ONE OF BEST LOOKING LEVELS EVER CREATED!

Btw. even GAMESPOT review team said that Crysis is easily best looking game EVER.

So stop spaming around

[QUOTE="Uptown"]

Wrong.

1. Crysis
2. Killzone 2
3. Gran Turismo 5
4. Resident Evil 5
5. Gears of War 2 (If the tech demo is anything to base of what is to come)

not even close to 2nd. saolin323

You HAVE to be kidding, those games are MILES behind Fable 2 and Crysis, none even has volumetric lighting

I cant believe you even attempted to respond to me.....Those 5 > Fable 2. period.

Can plants in Fable 2 move according to wind?? YES, the move with the wind

Can water ripples move according 2 wind in Fable 2? They said will best Bioshock water, so will look great anyway, but IDK

Can smoke and fire move according to wind in Fable 2? No, big deal ?

Can you shoot at trees and break down trees in Fable 2? No, so what ?

Can plants be moved when you walk through them in Fable 2? No, so what ?

Does Fable 2 have volumetric 3D clouds that move according 2 wind? IDK

Does Fable 2 have advanced character models?? NO

Does Fable 2 have photorealistic graphics? (even fantasy can be photorealistic,like LOTR movie so dont say its not meant to be photorealistic) WHO CARES ?

Man im tired of counting downa and i didnt mention even 2% of stuff you can do in Crysis.

And final version of Fable 2 WILL LOOK WORSE (and btw. those pictures you show us arent INGAME) because of optimisation and such.

Something like MOTORSTORM.Look at final version of it.And now look what they said it will look like.

It is called COMERCIALS.And i see that this FABLE 2 fanboy fell for it.

Lidve

Motorstorm pics were fakes, as all touched up PS3 game pics are, in most PS3 games

That new pic is 100% in game, and will get better, do not assume things that will not happen

Also all the above features are MINOR, what do i care if the water or leaves move according to the wind, if they move like in Fable 2, i do not care what DIRECTION they move, ok ? It is so silly

I will only agree that character models are nothing like Crysis in Fable 2, and Fable 2 does not have as good physics, again minor stuff IMO

[QUOTE="Lonelynight"][QUOTE="ProductNumber49"]

[QUOTE="Killfox"]This is the funniest **** I have ever seen. People who think fable2 on a technical stand point is better than crysis are just crazy. Also if some of oyu are going by this. Then GTA5 must be better on a more technical standpoint then Forza2 even though forza2 as some of the most advanced phisycs in a a car game while GTA5 has barely any.Lidve

Crysis: looks good...Only vegetation,no imagination,generic tropical island

Fable 2;immersive world,better art.

Im gonna prefer how Fable 2 looks but Crysis easily wins in the technical departement

Absolutely agree.BTW this FABLE 2 fanboy is posting BEST fable prerendered screenshots.And not so good medium to high Crysis screnshoots.

Here is one INGAME screenshot of Crysis.

ANHD CORE LEVEL IS ONE OF BEST LOOKING LEVELS EVER CREATED!

Btw. even GAMESPOT review team said that Crysis is easily best looking game EVER.

So stop spaming around

Core is also the smoothest playing level. I can put everything on very high, and average 25 FPS on my little ole ati 3850.I guess its because of it linear gameplay

I cant believe you even attempted to respond to me.....Those 5 > Fable 2. period.

Uptown

Attempted to respond ? I responded, Fable 2 is well above all those games, by many many miles

[QUOTE="Uptown"]

I cant believe you even attempted to respond to me.....Those 5 > Fable 2. period.

saolin323

Attempted to respond ? I responded, Fable 2 is well above all those games, by many many miles

My first question...How do you guage miles in this sense? My second question....proof?

[QUOTE="saolin323"]

[QUOTE="Uptown"]

I cant believe you even attempted to respond to me.....Those 5 > Fable 2. period.

Uptown

Attempted to respond ? I responded, Fable 2 is well above all those games, by many many miles

My first question...How do you guage miles in this sense? My second question....proof?

1 mile = 2.356 graphical units.

Come on Uptown, miles is a common standard for measuring graphics. You should know that.

Crysis can't be run smoothly on super computers.
Fable is running on the sub-par, stripped down, XBOX 360.

Do the math.

[QUOTE="Uptown"]

I cant believe you even attempted to respond to me.....Those 5 > Fable 2. period.

saolin323

Attempted to respond ? I responded, Fable 2 is well above all those games, by many many miles

[QUOTE="saolin323"]

[QUOTE="Uptown"]

I cant believe you even attempted to respond to me.....Those 5 > Fable 2. period.

ithilgore2006

Attempted to respond ? I responded, Fable 2 is well above all those games, by many many miles

None of those other games have

- volumetric lighting, with real columetric light beams moving with the sun, filtered by trees geomerty

- not even close the detail, shadows, lighting, grass, trees Fable 2 combines in that new forest pic, all they have is either small empty dark levels (Killzone 2, Gears 2), or empty spaces with walls around (like Garnt Turismo)

- none of those is free roaming like Fable 2, or have anything close to NPC's AI and scope of Fable 2

All in all, the only other games comparing are Resident Evil 5 and Far Cry 2, but the density of foliage and forests in both those is MILES behind Fable 2 new forest pic, so they are miles behind

All in all it is

1. Crysis

2. Fable 2

... miles of difference ...

3. Far Cry 2

4. Resisdent Evil 5

5. Project Offset

All the other titles look so vastly behind, they should never even be brought up IMO, even Gears 2

I have to go with Crysis on this one because it has better visual design and the environment is just flat out awesome. Fable 2 has great art style but it just doesn't look that great when compared to Crysis.-DarthMaul-

Maybe Crysis looks better (excluding art always) if you play it on a good PC, but the pics posted here with HUD, are so far from amazing, they just look great, but Fable 2 pic looks great too

The only way to see for real, is play both games on a HDTV, then all will be clear IMO

anyone saying fable should just go die now, cause thats TOTAL FANBOY! there is no way u can compare crysis withi any game out today or coming out later unless if it's far-cry 2. except that u all should quit life if u say Crysis isn't the best!

[QUOTE="ithilgore2006"][QUOTE="saolin323"]

[QUOTE="Uptown"]

I cant believe you even attempted to respond to me.....Those 5 > Fable 2. period.

saolin323

Attempted to respond ? I responded, Fable 2 is well above all those games, by many many miles

None of those other games have

- volumetric lighting, with real columetric light beams moving with the sun, filtered by trees geomerty

- not even close the detail, shadows, lighting, grass, trees Fable 2 combines in that new forest pic, all they have is either small empty dark levels (Killzone 2, Gears 2), or empty spaces with walls around (like Garnt Turismo)

- none of those is free roaming like Fable 2, or have anything close to NPC's AI and scope of Fable 2

All in all, the only other games comparing are Resident Evil 5 and Far Cry 2, but the density of foliage and forests in both those is MILES behind Fable 2 new forest pic, so they are miles behind

All in all it is

1. Crysis

2. Fable 2

... miles of difference ...

3. Far Cry 2

4. Resisdent Evil 5

5. Project Offset

All the other titles look so vastly behind, they should never even be brought up IMO, even Gears 2

Also, did you ever even look at footage of Killzone 2? It's lighting outsrips Fable 2 quite a lot. Andhave you seen the videos demonstrating GeoW 2, the one with huge open streets and hundreds of Locusts? Small dark areas, I don't think so.

Are you paid to advertise Fable 2. Because this is what happened with Fable 1, Peter Molyneux hyped the hell out of it, saying all these wild claims about how great it would be, andwhile it was good, it was nothing like whathe promised. He's doing to same thing with the sequel, and you sound just like him.

omg, this is still going on ! how big a fanboy can a person be !naval

People need to stop talking about unreleased games as if they're out already - that goes for people mentioning GoW2, Far Cry 2, etc. in addition to Fable 2. Crysis, I think, went through a downgrade (if anything) during its last few months of development, and the public gradually became aware that it wouldn't look 'quite' that good on their systems, that performance guidelines given before release were a bit optimistic. This has been a trend with graphical powerhouses, and at this point I'm skeptical of anything and everything.

As to the poll... Crysis.

First PS3 fanboys were talking about KZ2's lighting...now it has switched to Fable is z0mg TEH LIGHTIN AND DA TREES!...AND THE SHADOWS!!!!.....:?.Kahuna_1

[QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]First PS3 fanboys were talking about KZ2's lighting...now it has switched to Fable is z0mg TEH LIGHTIN AND DA TREES!...AND THE SHADOWS!!!!.....:?.numba1234

hahahaha, Killzone 2 looks like a year old game comparing to Fable 2 in every way imaginable, from the best textures of Fable 2, the huge detailed forests, the NON TINY levels, the stunning volumetric lighting, light beams etc KZ2 can only DREAM of etc etc etc

Crysis can't be run smoothly on super computers.
Fable is running on the sub-par, stripped down, XBOX 360.

Do the math.

AIH_PSP

I have yet to see it run on a Xbox 360.

[QUOTE="ithilgore2006"][QUOTE="saolin323"]

[QUOTE="Uptown"]

I cant believe you even attempted to respond to me.....Those 5 > Fable 2. period.

saolin323

Attempted to respond ? I responded, Fable 2 is well above all those games, by many many miles

None of those other games have

- volumetric lighting, with real columetric light beams moving with the sun, filtered by trees geomerty

- not even close the detail, shadows, lighting, grass, trees Fable 2 combines in that new forest pic, all they have is either small empty dark levels (Killzone 2, Gears 2), or empty spaces with walls around (like Garnt Turismo)

- none of those is free roaming like Fable 2, or have anything close to NPC's AI and scope of Fable 2

All in all, the only other games comparing are Resident Evil 5 and Far Cry 2, but the density of foliage and forests in both those is MILES behind Fable 2 new forest pic, so they are miles behind

All in all it is

1. Crysis

2. Fable 2

... miles of difference ...

3. Far Cry 2

4. Resisdent Evil 5

5. Project Offset

All the other titles look so vastly behind, they should never even be brought up IMO, even Gears 2

Far Cry 2 is so above fable 2, comon already!!!

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30936.html

Always keep in mind, Crysis is a final optimised game, Fable 2 pic will get 9 more months of work until release

But Fable 2 light beams, shadows and detail is definatly way ahead IMO, and is a given, Crysis is old now, Fable 2 is coming later, so was a given that would look far better

saolin323

Waht is wrong with you Bruv?

Crysis is more technically impressive in almost everyway,can you not see that?or are you just being a Fanboy of the worst kind,why someone would argue tooth and nail about what game looks better(especially when it obvious)is beyond me.

GOT LIFE ?

Answer.......No

RL >>>>Fable2

Crysis >>> Fable2

Kameo >> Fable2

Uncharted > Fable2

Fable2 > Pacman

[QUOTE="saolin323"]

Always keep in mind, Crysis is a final optimised game, Fable 2 pic will get 9 more months of work until release

But Fable 2 light beams, shadows and detail is definatly way ahead IMO, and is a given, Crysis is old now, Fable 2 is coming later, so was a given that would look far better

ukillwegrill

Waht is wrong with you Bruv?

Crysis is more technically impressive in almost everyway,can you not see that?or are you just being a Fanboy of the worst kind,why someone would argue tooth and nail about what game looks better(especially when it obvious)is beyond me.

GOT LIFE ?

Answer.......No

RL >>>>Fable2

Crysis >>> Fable2

Kameo >> Fable2

Uncharted > Fable2

Fable2 > Pacman

Kameo > Fable 2 ? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

And all other games you mention look like a JOKE comparing to Fable 2, bar Crysis and Far Cry 2 only

[QUOTE="ukillwegrill"][QUOTE="saolin323"]

Always keep in mind, Crysis is a final optimised game, Fable 2 pic will get 9 more months of work until release

But Fable 2 light beams, shadows and detail is definatly way ahead IMO, and is a given, Crysis is old now, Fable 2 is coming later, so was a given that would look far better

saolin323

Waht is wrong with you Bruv?

Crysis is more technically impressive in almost everyway,can you not see that?or are you just being a Fanboy of the worst kind,why someone would argue tooth and nail about what game looks better(especially when it obvious)is beyond me.

GOT LIFE ?

Answer.......No

RL >>>>Fable2

Crysis >>> Fable2

Kameo >> Fable2

Uncharted > Fable2

Fable2 > Pacman

Kameo > Fable 2 ? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

And all other games you mention look like a JOKE comparing to Fable 2, bar Crysis and Far Cry 2 only

Dude, lay of the coke and weed yeah