Why is the wii the laughing stock of the gaming industry?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for opex07
opex07

2236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 opex07
Member since 2007 • 2236 Posts
[QUOTE="Pices"] Mario Galaxy already destroys any last gen game. I already posted something saying that the Wii is stronger than the Xbox by 3 times.

Mario Galaxy destroys very little, it looks great artistically but doesn't have much graphically. SMG has very simple character models, very little going on on-screen, simple worlds, little texture work, etc..
Avatar image for Human-after-all
Human-after-all

2972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 Human-after-all
Member since 2009 • 2972 Posts
What? You mean Nintendo laughing all the way to the bank? I would too.
Avatar image for Half-Way
Half-Way

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 Half-Way
Member since 2010 • 5001 Posts

[QUOTE="Pices"] Mario Galaxy already destroys any last gen game. I already posted something saying that the Wii is stronger than the Xbox by 3 times.opex07
Mario Galaxy destroys very little, it looks great artistically but doesn't have much graphically. SMG has very simple character models, very little going on on-screen, simple worlds, little texture work, etc..

O,o

Avatar image for Pices
Pices

3910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#154 Pices
Member since 2005 • 3910 Posts

[QUOTE="Pices"] Mario Galaxy already destroys any last gen game. I already posted something saying that the Wii is stronger than the Xbox by 3 times.opex07
Mario Galaxy destroys very little, it looks great artistically but doesn't have much graphically. SMG has very simple character models, very little going on on-screen, simple worlds, little texture work, etc..

I don't see the point of your excuses, its still an incredible looking wii game.

Avatar image for opex07
opex07

2236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 opex07
Member since 2007 • 2236 Posts
[QUOTE="opex07"][QUOTE="Pices"] Mario Galaxy already destroys any last gen game. I already posted something saying that the Wii is stronger than the Xbox by 3 times.Pices
Mario Galaxy destroys very little, it looks great artistically but doesn't have much graphically. SMG has very simple character models, very little going on on-screen, simple worlds, little texture work, etc..

Its still an incredible wii game, i dont wanna hear excuses.

Its not an excuse you still haven't explained to me why you feel this game is better than anything else (if you are the person I believe I have talked to before about this several times). There are better Wii games to use as an example of what the Wii is capable of, but those games still do not beat other top tier games last gen.
Avatar image for opex07
opex07

2236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 opex07
Member since 2007 • 2236 Posts

[QUOTE="opex07"][QUOTE="Pices"] Mario Galaxy already destroys any last gen game. I already posted something saying that the Wii is stronger than the Xbox by 3 times.Half-Way

Mario Galaxy destroys very little, it looks great artistically but doesn't have much graphically. SMG has very simple character models, very little going on on-screen, simple worlds, little texture work, etc..

O,o

I don't know what that means.
Avatar image for Willy105
Willy105

26209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#157 Willy105
Member since 2005 • 26209 Posts
[QUOTE="opex07"][QUOTE="Pices"] Mario Galaxy already destroys any last gen game. I already posted something saying that the Wii is stronger than the Xbox by 3 times.

Mario Galaxy destroys very little, it looks great artistically but doesn't have much graphically. SMG has very simple character models, very little going on on-screen, simple worlds, little texture work, etc..

You are confusing art styIe with technical graphics.
Avatar image for Pices
Pices

3910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#158 Pices
Member since 2005 • 3910 Posts
[QUOTE="Pices"][QUOTE="opex07"] Mario Galaxy destroys very little, it looks great artistically but doesn't have much graphically. SMG has very simple character models, very little going on on-screen, simple worlds, little texture work, etc..opex07
Its still an incredible wii game, i dont wanna hear excuses.

Its not an excuse you still haven't explained to me why you feel this game is better than anything else (if you are the person I believe I have talked to before about this several times). There are better Wii games to use as an example of what the Wii is capable of, but those games still do not beat other top tier games last gen.

Because I've played one of the best looking games of last gen Doom 3 on the PC. A fantastic looking game but Galaxy blew me away
Avatar image for opex07
opex07

2236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 opex07
Member since 2007 • 2236 Posts
[QUOTE="opex07"][QUOTE="Pices"] Its still an incredible wii game, i dont wanna hear excuses.Pices
Its not an excuse you still haven't explained to me why you feel this game is better than anything else (if you are the person I believe I have talked to before about this several times). There are better Wii games to use as an example of what the Wii is capable of, but those games still do not beat other top tier games last gen.

Because I've played one of the best looking games of last gen Doom 3 on the PC. A fantastic looking game but Galaxy blew me away

and the reasons being?
Avatar image for Willy105
Willy105

26209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#160 Willy105
Member since 2005 • 26209 Posts
[QUOTE="Pices"][QUOTE="opex07"] Its not an excuse you still haven't explained to me why you feel this game is better than anything else (if you are the person I believe I have talked to before about this several times). There are better Wii games to use as an example of what the Wii is capable of, but those games still do not beat other top tier games last gen. opex07
Because I've played one of the best looking games of last gen Doom 3 on the PC. A fantastic looking game but Galaxy blew me away

and the reasons being?

60 fps framerate, no graphical glitches, actual colors, smooth non mo-cap animation, pleasing to the eyes, and such.
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#161 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
The Wii offers the most unique and refreshing gaming experiences. Case in point: No More Heroes. The most innovative and inventive game series this gen is found only on the Wii (for now).
Avatar image for opex07
opex07

2236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 opex07
Member since 2007 • 2236 Posts

You are confusing art styIe with technical graphics.Willy105

graphics when talking about games usually refer to the technical side of things, which Im sure you will agree with looking at this thread, which you mention almost nothing other than the technical things about games except for color (even though every game has to have some form of color).

Art $tyle is purely subjective and cannot be argued one way or another objectively.

Avatar image for Pices
Pices

3910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#163 Pices
Member since 2005 • 3910 Posts
[QUOTE="Pices"][QUOTE="opex07"] Its not an excuse you still haven't explained to me why you feel this game is better than anything else (if you are the person I believe I have talked to before about this several times). There are better Wii games to use as an example of what the Wii is capable of, but those games still do not beat other top tier games last gen. opex07
Because I've played one of the best looking games of last gen Doom 3 on the PC. A fantastic looking game but Galaxy blew me away

and the reasons being?

Blew me away because it looked incredible
Avatar image for opex07
opex07

2236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 opex07
Member since 2007 • 2236 Posts
[QUOTE="Pices"] Blew me away because it looked incredible

and why did it look more incredible than Doom?
Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#165 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts
Better sales doesn't make a better system.
Avatar image for Pices
Pices

3910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#166 Pices
Member since 2005 • 3910 Posts
[QUOTE="Pices"] Blew me away because it looked incredibleopex07
and why did it look more incredible than Doom?

The game runs much smoother, better lightning effects, amazing water effects, incredibly detailed environments and great texture work. Sorry, but not your typical graphics nerd.
Avatar image for Half-Way
Half-Way

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 Half-Way
Member since 2010 • 5001 Posts

[QUOTE="Pices"] Blew me away because it looked incredibleopex07
and why did it look more incredible than Doom?

better lighning, textures, level design, frame rate ect. just to name a few

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#168 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="opex07"][QUOTE="Pices"] Blew me away because it looked incrediblePices
and why did it look more incredible than Doom?

The game runs much smoother, better lightning effects, amazing water effects, incredibly detailed environments and great texture work. Sorry, but not your typical graphics nerd.

:|

Please tell me you're joking.

Avatar image for opex07
opex07

2236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 opex07
Member since 2007 • 2236 Posts

better lighning, textures, level design, frame rate ect. just to name a few

Half-Way

The game runs much smoother, better lightning effects, amazing water effects, incredibly detailed environments and great texture work. Sorry, but not your typical graphics nerd.Pices

I don't know what to say to you guys if you actual believe these things....

Avatar image for Pices
Pices

3910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#170 Pices
Member since 2005 • 3910 Posts

[QUOTE="Pices"][QUOTE="opex07"] and why did it look more incredible than Doom?princeofshapeir

The game runs much smoother, better lightning effects, amazing water effects, incredibly detailed environments and great texture work. Sorry, but not your typical graphics nerd.

:|

Please tell me you're joking.

No, I'm not. And screenshots do no justice. Played them in person, I know whatI'm talking about.

Avatar image for Pices
Pices

3910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#171 Pices
Member since 2005 • 3910 Posts
[QUOTE="opex07"]

[QUOTE="Half-Way"]

better lighning, textures, level design, frame rate ect. just to name a few

The game runs much smoother, better lightning effects, amazing water effects, incredibly detailed environments and great texture work. Sorry, but not your typical graphics nerd.Pices

I don't know what to say to you guys if you actual believe these things....

Shocker, eh? You asked me, I gave you an answer. Simple as that
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#172 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]

[QUOTE="Pices"] The game runs much smoother, better lightning effects, amazing water effects, incredibly detailed environments and great texture work. Sorry, but not your typical graphics nerd.Pices

Please tell me you're joking.

No, I'm not. And screenshots do no justice. Played them in person, I know what you're talking about.

I've played both games, and I have to say that neither of you know what you're talking about. The textures in SMG are a blurred mess compared to the textures in Doom 3. Have you ever zoomed in on a wall, or the ground in SMG? Or any character model? Up close, you're looking at a jumble of pixels and splotchy colors that pale in comparison to last-gen PC games like Doom 3. Just look at the textures on the floor in the SMG picture: they look incredibly undetailed. Oh, but sorry, I forgot: apparently when you're playing these games in motion, the textures magically transform into hi-res versions. :lol: SMG is a good-looking game for the Wii, but don't even try to compare it to Doom 3 on a technical level.
Avatar image for Pices
Pices

3910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#173 Pices
Member since 2005 • 3910 Posts

[QUOTE="Pices"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]

Please tell me you're joking.

princeofshapeir

No, I'm not. And screenshots do no justice. Played them in person, I know what you're talking about.

I've played both games, and I have to say that neither of you know what you're talking about. The textures in SMG are a blurred mess compared to the textures in Doom 3. Have you ever zoomed in on a wall, or the ground in SMG? Or any character model? Up close, you're looking at a jumble of pixels and splotchy colors that pale in comparison to last-gen PC games like Doom 3. Just look at the textures on the floor in the SMG picture: they look incredibly undetailed. Oh, but sorry, I forgot: apparently when you're playing these games in motion, the textures magically transform into hi-res versions. :lol: SMG is a good-looking game for the Wii, but don't even try to compare it to Doom 3 on a technical level.

LOL, I could say the same exact thing to you. I know what I'm talking about? :) You don't like it? Tough luck

Avatar image for Willy105
Willy105

26209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#174 Willy105
Member since 2005 • 26209 Posts
Mario Galaxy is a game whose looks thrive in motion. Doom 3's looks thrive on screens.
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#175 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="Pices"] No, I'm not. And screenshots do no justice. Played them in person, I know what you're talking about.Pices

I've played both games, and I have to say that neither of you know what you're talking about. The textures in SMG are a blurred mess compared to the textures in Doom 3. Have you ever zoomed in on a wall, or the ground in SMG? Or any character model? Up close, you're looking at a jumble of pixels and splotchy colors that pale in comparison to last-gen PC games like Doom 3. Just look at the textures on the floor in the SMG picture: they look incredibly undetailed. Oh, but sorry, I forgot: apparently when you're playing these games in motion, the textures magically transform into hi-res versions. :lol: SMG is a good-looking game for the Wii, but don't even try to compare it to Doom 3 on a technical level.

LOL, I could say the same exact thing to you. I know what I'm talking about? :) You don't like it? Tough luck

You don't know what you're talking about, and you're wrong. SMG looks far worse than Doom 3. I could show you a thousand more pictures of Doom 3 and SMG and compare them side-by-side, and even circle texture areas in every screenshot in MS Paint or something. If you're going to just sit here and stick your fingers in your ears while yelling "LA-LA-LA-LA I CAN"T HEAR YOU", fine. I've seen Cows, Lemmings, and Sheep do that enough these days and I've gotten pretty used to it.
Avatar image for Willy105
Willy105

26209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#176 Willy105
Member since 2005 • 26209 Posts

I've played both games, and I have to say that neither of you know what you're talking about. The textures in SMG are a blurred mess compared to the textures in Doom 3. Have you ever zoomed in on a wall, or the ground in SMG? Or any character model? Up close, you're looking at a jumble of pixels and splotchy colors that pale in comparison to last-gen PC games like Doom 3. Just look at the textures on the floor in the SMG picture: they look incredibly undetailed. Oh, but sorry, I forgot: apparently when you're playing these games in motion, the textures magically transform into hi-res versions. :lol: princeofshapeir
Textures don't work like that. They won't become higher res magically when going into motion. Also, you are missing the point, it's not whether which texture is higher res, it's which one looks better.

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#177 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] I've played both games, and I have to say that neither of you know what you're talking about. The textures in SMG are a blurred mess compared to the textures in Doom 3. Have you ever zoomed in on a wall, or the ground in SMG? Or any character model? Up close, you're looking at a jumble of pixels and splotchy colors that pale in comparison to last-gen PC games like Doom 3. Just look at the textures on the floor in the SMG picture: they look incredibly undetailed. Oh, but sorry, I forgot: apparently when you're playing these games in motion, the textures magically transform into hi-res versions. :lol: Willy105

Textures don't work like that. They won't become higher res magically when going into motion. Also, you are missing the point, it's not whether which texture is higher res, it's which one looks better.

I was being sarcastic. And a texture looks more detailed at a higher resolution. If you can provide an example of an up-close SMG texture looking bettter than an up-close Doom 3 texture, go for it. And just so we're clear here as to which game looks better in motion: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fn5AmSO45Ks
Avatar image for opex07
opex07

2236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 opex07
Member since 2007 • 2236 Posts

textures

more to come

Avatar image for Willy105
Willy105

26209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#180 Willy105
Member since 2005 • 26209 Posts

SO Pices, proud of yourself? You got me suspended for "Harrassing" you, when I was just stating the obvious. Really, if you can't handle this place, just go. It would make many people happy!

gmc2u_64
You were the one that did the wrong thing. He has the higher ground.
Avatar image for Ugalde-
Ugalde-

3732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 Ugalde-
Member since 2009 • 3732 Posts
It just doesn't appeal to hardcore gamers enough and it has no online which is something bad for this day and age.
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#182 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

texture comparison

more to come

opex07

Nice job. This just about sums it up.

Avatar image for Willy105
Willy105

26209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#183 Willy105
Member since 2005 • 26209 Posts
Also, if you can't grasp where we are coming from, Doom 3 was intentionally developed to look as ugly and gritty as possible. By contrast, SMG was made to look as good and pleasing as possible. It took a lot of work to make Doom 3 look as ugly and gritty as possible, and it is a technical marvel. But it also has to deal with that fact.
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#184 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
[QUOTE="Willy105"]Also, if you can't grasp where we are coming from, Doom 3 was intentionally developed to look as ugly and gritty as possible. By contrast, SMG was made to look as good and pleasing as possible. It took a lot of work to make Doom 3 look as ugly and gritty as possible, and it is a technical marvel. But it also has to deal with that fact.

Um. What. We're not arguing about the atmosphere of either game. We're talking, technically, about the graphics in each game. Pices said that SMG had better textures and maintained a better framerate. He has been proven wrong several times already.
Avatar image for Willy105
Willy105

26209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#185 Willy105
Member since 2005 • 26209 Posts

texture comparison

more to come

opex07

But look at it this way: The Doom 3 screen shows a very small confined, rectangular room with little lightning. Meanwhile, Super Mario Galaxy is showing very large environments with no pop-ups, round and curvey environments, not to mention all the characters running around the area with full animations.

Avatar image for Willy105
Willy105

26209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#186 Willy105
Member since 2005 • 26209 Posts

[QUOTE="Willy105"]Also, if you can't grasp where we are coming from, Doom 3 was intentionally developed to look as ugly and gritty as possible. By contrast, SMG was made to look as good and pleasing as possible. It took a lot of work to make Doom 3 look as ugly and gritty as possible, and it is a technical marvel. But it also has to deal with that fact.princeofshapeir
Um. What. We're not arguing about the atmosphere of either game. We're talking, technically, about the graphics in each game. Pices said that SMG had better textures and maintained a better framerate. He has been proven wrong several times already.

Framerate depends on the hardware, and SMG runs 100% at 60 fps on the Wii. Meanwhile Doom 3 runs at 30 fps (and some publications say it runs at 20 fps) on the Xbox.

Avatar image for opex07
opex07

2236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#187 opex07
Member since 2007 • 2236 Posts

Lighting

more to come

Avatar image for gmc2u_64
gmc2u_64

2402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#188 gmc2u_64
Member since 2005 • 2402 Posts

[QUOTE="gmc2u_64"]

SO Pices, proud of yourself? You got me suspended for "Harrassing" you, when I was just stating the obvious. Really, if you can't handle this place, just go. It would make many people happy!

Willy105

You were the one that did the wrong thing. He has the higher ground.

All I did was stating the obvious by saying he's a bit insecure, and the fact that he called the MODs on me supports my point.

I mean, come on Willy! Don't tell me you're on Pices' side when he CONSTANTLY claims that people ae "Harrassing" him.

Pices, I swear that if you call the MODs on me again, you're just gonna get no respect from me or anyone else.

Avatar image for Willy105
Willy105

26209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#189 Willy105
Member since 2005 • 26209 Posts

Lighting

more to come

opex07

And once again, the Doom 3 screen is at a much smaller scale, has one monster and few details (which is why it can achieve the lightining and shadows). The Mario Galaxy screen has two big, round Goombas with their own particle effects while walking, plus the round green warp pipe and the glowing giant 1-Up at the top.

Avatar image for Willy105
Willy105

26209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#190 Willy105
Member since 2005 • 26209 Posts

[QUOTE="Willy105"][QUOTE="gmc2u_64"]

SO Pices, proud of yourself? You got me suspended for "Harrassing" you, when I was just stating the obvious. Really, if you can't handle this place, just go. It would make many people happy!

gmc2u_64

You were the one that did the wrong thing. He has the higher ground.

All I did was stating the obvious by saying he's a bit insecure, and the fact that he called the MODs on me supports my point.

I mean, come on Willy! Don't tell me you're on Pices' side when he CONSTANTLY claims that people ae "Harrassing" him.

Pices, I swear that if you call the MODs on me again, you're just gonna get no respect from me or anyone else.

I didn't call the mods, but you obviously annoyed someone enough to do it. Don't harrass people, try to convince them wrong nicely, not treating them like idiots.
Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#191 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="Willy105"][QUOTE="gmc2u_64"]

SO Pices, proud of yourself? You got me suspended for "Harrassing" you, when I was just stating the obvious. Really, if you can't handle this place, just go. It would make many people happy!

gmc2u_64

You were the one that did the wrong thing. He has the higher ground.

All I did was stating the obvious by saying he's a bit insecure, and the fact that he called the MODs on me supports my point.

I mean, come on Willy! Don't tell me you're on Pices' side when he CONSTANTLY claims that people ae "Harrassing" him.

Pices, I swear that if you call the MODs on me again, you're just gonna get no respect from me or anyone else.

You're suppose to call the mods when you are being attacked. Don't argue with people that just annoy, its a recipe for moderation. Trust me, I would know.

Avatar image for gmc2u_64
gmc2u_64

2402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#192 gmc2u_64
Member since 2005 • 2402 Posts

[QUOTE="gmc2u_64"]

[QUOTE="Willy105"] You were the one that did the wrong thing. He has the higher ground.Willy105

All I did was stating the obvious by saying he's a bit insecure, and the fact that he called the MODs on me supports my point.

I mean, come on Willy! Don't tell me you're on Pices' side when he CONSTANTLY claims that people ae "Harrassing" him.

Pices, I swear that if you call the MODs on me again, you're just gonna get no respect from me or anyone else.

I didn't call the mods, but you obviously annoyed someone enough to do it. Don't harrass people, try to convince them wrong nicely, not treating them like idiots.

Oh lord... I WAS trying to not be an ass, but Pices called the MODs just because I said that he's insecure (Don't try to defend Pices there, just don't), which was the SECOND POST I made to him in that thread. HOW is that NOT insecure? And how was I treating him like an idiot?

Avatar image for gmc2u_64
gmc2u_64

2402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#193 gmc2u_64
Member since 2005 • 2402 Posts

[QUOTE="gmc2u_64"]

[QUOTE="Willy105"] You were the one that did the wrong thing. He has the higher ground.ActicEdge

All I did was stating the obvious by saying he's a bit insecure, and the fact that he called the MODs on me supports my point.

I mean, come on Willy! Don't tell me you're on Pices' side when he CONSTANTLY claims that people ae "Harrassing" him.

Pices, I swear that if you call the MODs on me again, you're just gonna get no respect from me or anyone else.

You're suppose to call the mods when you are being attacked. Don't argue with people that just annoy, its a recipe for moderation. Trust me, I would know.

Thanks for the advice, Actic. I'll keep that in mind when Pices is around.

Avatar image for opex07
opex07

2236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#194 opex07
Member since 2007 • 2236 Posts

character models

one more

Avatar image for opex07
opex07

2236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#195 opex07
Member since 2007 • 2236 Posts

And once again, the Doom 3 screen is at a much smaller scale, has one monster and few details (which is why it can achieve the lightining and shadows). The Mario Galaxy screen has two big, round Goombas with their own particle effects while walking, plus the round green warp pipe and the glowing giant 1-Up at the top.

Willy105

Mario Galaxy has very little going on screen most of the time as well as Doom, but the things going on in doom is a much larger achievement due to the complexity of those things, having two complex monsters walking about is going to be far more diffucult than two very simple goombas. Also simply making/scaling a goomba larger or a pipe bigger wont necessarily add more geometry to the scene a 4 X 4 box is going to be the same polygons as a 16X16 box. SMG does have larger maps though, but those maps are not close to being as detailed as Dooms.

Avatar image for RuprechtMonkey
RuprechtMonkey

1509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#196 RuprechtMonkey
Member since 2008 • 1509 Posts

It has worse tech than its competition.

Yet it is still able to achieve 1st in sales.

And pump out loads of AAE-AAAE games.

So what if it has casual garbage.

Considering its standing point. It is an achievement that it is what it is today.

TheDogout

Wii is pumping out loads of AAAE games? What alternate universe are we in right now?

The reason the Wii is picked on is precisely for that reason - the fact that it is number 1 in sales but has the LEAST amount of fantastic games.

Avatar image for awssk8er716
awssk8er716

8485

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#197 awssk8er716
Member since 2005 • 8485 Posts

It has worse tech than its competition.

Yet it is still able to achieve 1st in sales.

And pump out loads of AAE-AAAE games.

So what if it has casual garbage.

Considering its standing point. It is an achievement that it is what it is today.

TheDogout

Wow, I'm surprised. I thought you were going to make fun of the Wii, but you did the opposite.

Most gamers don't like it because of graphics.

People who kind of play video games, but not much don't like it because they feel like they are supposed to.

And almost everyone just hasn't given it a chance.

Also, to my second point, and example is that we were talking about video games in my drafting c1ass and this one kid (Who is a complete moron) was saying how everyone he knows with a 360 and PS3 prefers the PS3, which I agree with. Then I said that I have a Wii and a PS3, and I like my Wii a lot more. The kid said, "You like the Wii more? Isn't that a little pathetic? Or embarassing?" I was like, "How is it embarassing?" He said, "Well, it has really bad graphics... and no one really likes it."

So basically, I told him that I don't care what other people think, and my opinion is that it has the best games and controls.

Avatar image for Wellzification
Wellzification

107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#198 Wellzification
Member since 2010 • 107 Posts
Family orientated games. End Of. Kids outnumber console gamers, and looky looky, the Wii is aimed at families with a fun feel about it, perfect advertising and perfect release games...gave the console a massive edge on the ps3 and xbox 360. Bowling, tennis, boxing...mini games etc was what it was intended for. By no means at all is this console the laughing stock of the gaming industry, Nintendo knew exactly what they were doing when they created this, and its worked! I have 2 Wii's in my house, 1 360 and 1 ps3. Any family with kids, say....under 10? will undoubtebly head straight for the Wii! Oh yeah.....and its the f**king cheapest!!! If theres a laughing stock console...its the ps3. No online community (Yeah you can walk around now, excellent,not.) and very few games!
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#199 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="Willy105"]

And once again, the Doom 3 screen is at a much smaller scale, has one monster and few details (which is why it can achieve the lightining and shadows). The Mario Galaxy screen has two big, round Goombas with their own particle effects while walking, plus the round green warp pipe and the glowing giant 1-Up at the top.

opex07

Mario Galaxy has very little going on screen most of the time as well as Doom, but the things going on in doom is a much larger achievement due to the complexity of those things, having two complex monsters walking about is going to be far more diffucult than two very simple goombas. Also simply making/scaling a goomba larger or a pipe bigger wont necessarily add more geometry to the scene a 4 X 4 box is going to be the same polygons as a 16X16 box. SMG does have larger maps though, but those maps are not close to being as detailed as Dooms.

Exactly. Super Mario Galaxy's scale is only achievable because the character models and textures are so primitive and undetailed up-close. It takes far more processing power to render a game like Doom 3, where there is copious detail on everything, from character models to environments.
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#200 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="Willy105"]Also, if you can't grasp where we are coming from, Doom 3 was intentionally developed to look as ugly and gritty as possible. By contrast, SMG was made to look as good and pleasing as possible. It took a lot of work to make Doom 3 look as ugly and gritty as possible, and it is a technical marvel. But it also has to deal with that fact.Willy105

Um. What. We're not arguing about the atmosphere of either game. We're talking, technically, about the graphics in each game. Pices said that SMG had better textures and maintained a better framerate. He has been proven wrong several times already.

Framerate depends on the hardware, and SMG runs 100% at 60 fps on the Wii. Meanwhile Doom 3 runs at 30 fps (and some publications say it runs at 20 fps) on the Xbox.

Doom 3 is also on the PC. And with the PC gaming hardware standards of today, constant 60 fps with max settings is easily achievable.