Wow I'm not impressed with Pokemon XY's graphics

3/10

Try harder.

lets all be honest here..it does look pretty bad.

lets all be honest here..it does look pretty bad.

ultraking

For a 3DS game, the graphics are actually great.

lets all be honest here..it does look pretty bad.

ultraking

It looks standard for a 3ds game, and it actually looks quite good in the battle sequences.

[QUOTE="ultraking"]

lets all be honest here..it does look pretty bad.

XVision84

For a 3DS game, the graphics are actually great.

Sheep dont care about graphics at least they better not since Nintendo is cool with staying about 5 years behind current tech.

[QUOTE="ultraking"]

lets all be honest here..it does look pretty bad.

el3m2tigre

It looks standard for a 3ds game, and it actually looks quite good in the battle sequences.

[QUOTE="el3m2tigre"]

[QUOTE="ultraking"]

lets all be honest here..it does look pretty bad.

ultraking

It looks standard for a 3ds game, and it actually looks quite good in the battle sequences.

So now a 3DS game needs to have good graphics to be considered a "great 3ds game"?

You're overestimating the 3DS's power. Resident Evil is the best looking game on it, but that's not saying much.

[QUOTE="ultraking"][QUOTE="el3m2tigre"]

It looks standard for a 3ds game, and it actually looks quite good in the battle sequences.

el3m2tigre

So now a 3DS game needs to have good graphics to be considered a "great 3ds game"?

[QUOTE="el3m2tigre"]

[QUOTE="ultraking"]standard would be any Mario game.. a great 3ds game is resident evil.. theres power in the system , why noto use it? I mean those pokedex models were a great starting pointultraking

So now a 3DS game needs to have good graphics to be considered a "great 3ds game"?

Because good graphics is non existent on it?

[QUOTE="ultraking"][QUOTE="el3m2tigre"]

It looks standard for a 3ds game, and it actually looks quite good in the battle sequences.

el3m2tigre

So now a 3DS game needs to have good graphics to be considered a "great 3ds game"?

You're overestimating the 3DS's power. Resident Evil is the best looking game on it, but that's not saying much.

EDIT: and pokemon is their flagship title

[QUOTE="el3m2tigre"]

[QUOTE="ultraking"]standard would be any Mario game.. a great 3ds game is resident evil.. theres power in the system , why noto use it? I mean those pokedex models were a great starting pointultraking

So now a 3DS game needs to have good graphics to be considered a "great 3ds game"?

You're overestimating the 3DS's power. Resident Evil is the best looking game on it, but that's not saying much.

EDIT: and pokemon is their flagship title

No it does not say a lot because Resident Evil on 3DS does not look good. The 3DS does not have good looking games, but that's okay because good looking games is not what the average person is looking for in the 3DS. If you were expecting good looking game when you bought it then you deserve to be disappointed.

[QUOTE="ultraking"]

[QUOTE="el3m2tigre"]

So now a 3DS game needs to have good graphics to be considered a "great 3ds game"?

You're overestimating the 3DS's power. Resident Evil is the best looking game on it, but that's not saying much.

el3m2tigre

EDIT: and pokemon is their flagship title

No it does not say a lot because Resident Evil on 3DS does not look good. The 3DS does not have good looking games, but that's okay because good looking games is not what the average person is looking for in the 3DS. If you were expecting good looking game when you bought it then you deserve to be disappointed.

It does look like butt.

I agree with the people that say it doesn't look crisp. I thought it'd be a fully 3D world, but it just looks like a 2D sprite world turned on its side.

Oh well I guess.

I might get it if my friends do, but I only know one friend with a 3DS right now, and meh to that guy :P The game itself has remained too much the same to care to play through it for the single player. I'll be interested in getting it for multiplayer if enough people I know get it as well.

[QUOTE="ultraking"]

lets all be honest here..it does look pretty bad.

XVision84

For a 3DS game, the graphics are actually great.

3DS is capable of GC/PS2 level polygon counts with 3D mode, and has about 96mb of RAM. The game is basically using the DS engine. There is no texture filtering to speak of. The graphics are subpar for the 3DS. At least have texture filtering and some bloom or something. Granted they do have a year left soooo maybe they'll fix the issues.

I thought it looked ok and I havent played a pokemon game since blue. Im happy it looks like they are putting more efforts in the graphics front insted of it being 2d still.

About TankBusterJenn.

The traveling visuals aren't anything to gush over, but that's probably because all the effort was poured into the unrealistically good graphics of the battles. The character models for the 600+ pokemon and having them animated is no easy task. Espicially when they look this good

This is one hell of a technical acheivement.

Pikminmaniac

This is more or less what i thought seeing the thread title.

Get it together Nintendo fanboys.

TankBusterJenn

That's beyond terrible.

I'd rather have the worldmap as 2-D with battles in 3-D if that's the case.

As previously said, nobody plays the pokemon games for their graphics.

However I was expecting them to be at least up to the Pokemon XD or Pokemon Colleseum graphics.

Who plays Nintendo games for Graphics?

Yea the graphics are not impressive but People are just glad that it's in freaking 3D now!

[QUOTE="Pikminmaniac"]

The traveling visuals aren't anything to gush over, but that's probably because all the effort was poured into the unrealistically good graphics of the battles. The character models for the 600+ pokemon and having them animated is no easy task. Espicially when they look this good

This is one hell of a technical acheivement.

Lucianu

This is more or less what i thought seeing the thread title.

the graphics are ok(could be better though). but the jaggies looks kinda bad in the video. hope gamefreak fixes that.

TheShadowLord07

[QUOTE="ultraking"]

lets all be honest here..it does look pretty bad.

el3m2tigre

It looks standard for a 3ds game, and it actually looks quite good in the battle sequences.

[QUOTE="Lucianu"]

[QUOTE="Pikminmaniac"]

The traveling visuals aren't anything to gush over, but that's probably because all the effort was poured into the unrealistically good graphics of the battles. The character models for the 600+ pokemon and having them animated is no easy task. Espicially when they look this good

This is one hell of a technical acheivement.

g0ddyX

This is more or less what i thought seeing the thread title.

No no, you are fooled. You're fooling yourself.

Are you suggesting that they're going to fit in millions of cutscenes on to one cartridge?

[QUOTE="Lucianu"]

[QUOTE="Pikminmaniac"]

The traveling visuals aren't anything to gush over, but that's probably because all the effort was poured into the unrealistically good graphics of the battles. The character models for the 600+ pokemon and having them animated is no easy task. Espicially when they look this good

This is one hell of a technical acheivement.

g0ddyX

This is more or less what i thought seeing the thread title.

[QUOTE="TheShadowLord07"]

the graphics are ok(could be better though). but the jaggies looks kinda bad in the video. hope gamefreak fixes that.

SaltyMeatballs

The overworld is terrible.

But the battles look surprisingly good though, especially after that 3D pokedex app :S

ohh lol lvl 10, baby's first troll

Are you kidding? Those graphics are pretty good. For a handheld Pokemon game, that's a big improvement.

Gamers sure are over-demanding. You guys need to learn to not be so spoiled.

It's not the best looking 3DS game but it's definitely not horrible. True, it could be better and probably will be before it's release. October 2013 is still a long ways off.Haziqonfire

Indeed, if you noticed the graphical glitches, it was clear they arent exactly done yet.

1. Its the 3DS what the hell were you expecting? 2. The series has never been know for graphics and no one really cares that the graphics are not cutting edge thats not why people buy these games.

It does look terrible, I pointed this out and got told it wouldn't make sense on the WiiU.

I beg to differ.

Perfect for this thread. Not sure if posted yet but here goes.

Nintendo does not care about technology, they are always a gen behind. This is why it is very important for them to never become the only one, if it is they would take us all back to the stone age of gaming. The only good thing about Nintendo is their 1st party games, which is the only reason I buy their systems.

Honestly they would just be better off as 3rd party really.