[QUOTE="B1GFreakN"]
[QUOTE="Prophylactixx"]
I'm truly amazed with such ground-breaking logic. Next time you have a thought, do us all a favor and let it go...
Topics like these are fast becoming redundant, if they haven't reached that point already. Activision is a business and like any business the sole purpose is to make a profit by providing a service, so as to continue providing said service. As with any business, buying various intellectual properties in an attempt to maximize profitability is going to happen. Likewise, selling properties that are not profitable will happen as well. No one here has access to information at the highest level between Activision and Take Two, therefor making such ignorantly biased speculations is ridiculous and pointless.
Prophylactixx
Not that you're wrong, what you said was perfect business economy 101, but there is a trend between Activision and greed. We aren't saying Activision is greedy because they seek revenue. Everyone knows that revenue and proft keep the company alive. But, seeking to create revenue on stupid things, like the rumored Pay to Play subscriptions is definitely Greed. I know they made a statement that said there will never be pay to play services will their popular franchise, Call of Duty, but even mentioning it is somewhat rediculuos. Couldn't you agree?
There is a line between creating revenue to keep the business afloat and unmeritted greed. Activision does a greedy trend about them, so the other comment was not entirely false.
Let me then ask you this. Is Microsoft also greedy? As they charge a hefty price for various items i.e. console, games, accessories, AND they also charge a regulatory fee for using their online service XBL. This rumored "pay to play" is just that, a rumor, and a less than credible one at that. The rumor came from pure speculation of various articles that neither directly nor indirectly point towards such a concept. It's not greedy to make an effort to expand your companies profile in an attempt to reach more customers, thusly creating a higher profit margin; it's good business. The simple fact is that it's become "trendy" to call Activision an "evil" company that is set out to destroy the world.
Well, a lot of people argue that Microsoft is greedy, and I can see your point. I don't really know how I feel about Microsoft's level of greed. I do know one thing though, I don't mind paying for Xbox Live, and when I buy Xbox accessories, I always buy the Microsoft ones because no other brand, in my own personal experiences, can match the quality of their controllers and such. But, also note, I don't buy these things at retail prices. I buy Live subcriptions and accessories from other sources rather than micorosoft. I usually get a subscription to xbox live on the internet through ebay or Amazon. I get cheaper official accessories on these sites. So, while you can argue that Microsoft is greedy at times, theres the loop-hole that you can actually acquire them cheaper than retail, and it doesn't seem as bad.
You could probably argue the same about Activision's prducts also. I wasn't staking my claim that Activision is the greed capital of the world and they will monopolize the whole planet, but I can see both sides of the argument. And yes, I also see the trend that everyone whines about Activision - it's all over these boards. haha.
Log in to comment