Looks GREAT...people are just hating it cause they are close up shots, showing more flaws...any game can look like this if viewed like that.

http://www.video.dpadmagazine.com/2008/10/29/eurogamer-expo-killzone-2-single-player-footage-pt-1

IMO that is. So far the FPS genre is a dying one IMO, just to much of the same, but K2 will change that, not just visually for console, its the weight, depth and overall experience that IMO, hasn't been seen in a console FPS before, the animations are insane and just seems fun to play. I see my self just running around and shooting people to death, even after they are dead, just to see the reaction and insane blood work.

i think what i love the most is the movements/animations, it look real and handles real, GG wasn't joking when they said they want it to feel like a movie.

Just embarasses the developers in all honesty. The game looks like garbage, in no way shape or form does it push the consoles, in comparison with say R2, Gears 2, Killzone 2, R5, all look far far better. Just because the developers make a crappy unoptimised game doesnt mean the consoles are crap.pseudocaesar

i agree, to many devs keep saying this, yet other games prove it wrong.

but , its matched up anyways, this just proves what we all know, the PS3 is more complex and harder to work with.

good thing is, there are PS3 games already out and due out that show the PS3 is a beast. same with the 360...so meh.

LOL, fanboys.

The PS3's artictecture isn't bad, its great...its just MORE DIFFICULT THAN YOUR STANDARD PC ONES that the 360 and PC uses. the HARDWARE and POWER IS THERE, it just harder to get to it, EXPECIALLY if your using the 360 as the lead platform, thats why when games are done with the PS3 in mind FIRST, they both look amazing and have less problems.

Sony's design choices as A lot to do with the future and wanting the console to keep pushing out better graphics, hence the PS2...over many years, devs will still be getting more out of the PS3, due to the design. Of course if you have the money and working with the right tools, you can get that power out quicker, (killzone 2, Uncharted, R2, R&C, MGS4, etc)

some company just don't have the time and money to work a little more on the PS3, and more so because it was done on the 360 first as the lead platform. this will change once the PS3 version are the lead ones.

we can't all have consoles with the same designs. but keep in mind that there are some great games out there already shown and PROVEN the PS3 is capable of such high tech gaming experiences/graphics.

i barley notice a difference, the PS3 version's draw distance seems sharper and less blurry the lighting seems a bit more lighter and washed out...but nothing major.

Why did GS make it seem like it was a night and day difference?

WTF is with your english dude.....dunnedlor

Yes, because the world = English....:roll:

as for the topic, HALO 3 was great, nothing special, IMO.

Lol. You really do fail at reading.

They're not MY complaints. Yes, people do compalin about it for glitches and AI. Look at page 1 of this thread and you'll see.

They're reasons OTHERS dont like it.

ukillwegrill

whoops, thought i was still having it with the other dude who complained about the game on the first page.....but for your complaints.

Play MGS4 on BIG BOSS mode and come back to me, your confusing difficulty with A.I concerning gears, the Locust are pretty much brain dead, when you turn up the difficutly they just shoot a lot more, as does most games.

like i said, MGS4 is more service to the fans, any MGS fan who grew up with MGS1, would find MGS4 to be amazing. NO game is perfect, NONE! but MGS4 raised the bar in how story lines should be told and how they should be done, IMO. Any review will agree, some just shoot it for being LONG. pfft.

every game has glitches A. I probs, etc...Gears epecially concerning glitches. those are pathetic arguments.