@IAMTYLERDURDEN I didn't complain about GTA V at all, I just said that I'd pay for it now if didn't have something I hated. It's like saying I'd send MS a check if the Next-Box launched with Halo 5, or if the PS4 launched with a new GOW. Doesn't mean that I won't buy those systems if it doesn't happen. I like the games I like, you like the games you like.

@00J The Wii was a success, but people hated it all the same.

@ERoBB @Wizallah I made that point because it was in the last (major) GTA game before GTA IV. Most companies don't put that much effort into a feature just to remove it in the next game unless it was flawed. I realize that it wouldn't have made much sense considering that GTA IV was more about the story this time (and the fact that SA was more of a major expansion to the original GTA III game than a sequel), but it was still a feature I missed.

@Wizallah First of all, you give a crap because you took the time to reply. Secondly, hate missions like that, period. Why does everyone that responds to someone hating GTA (or in my case, one aspect of it) tell them to go play Saints Row?Just because you like something doesn't mean everyone does. I don't like COD that much, but I don't hate on the people that do.

I do rent games before i buy them, I also hate QTE's in games that use them repeatedly just for the hell of it. That's why I played RE6 for a few hours and returned it.

@Wizallah It's called releasing information. It's that same way we know Dan Houser doesn't think gamers "will find themselves repeating similar missions again and again." If I look hard enough, I'll find the article about GTA IV that said we would have different ways to accomplish a mission where you had to follow the guy on the train (game informer I believe). When I played that mission, I had no choice but to drive, knowing full well which stop he was getting off at.

@Wizallah Character customization was in San Andreas.

@ooblah I see English isn't your first language, because you obviously didn't understand my post. My point was that he shouldn't try to speak for everyone in his response to someone he thinks is also trying to speak for everyone else.

"The majority of GTA fans have moved on, if you can't, go play fucking SAINTS ROW." If I can't move on, then I couldn't go play Saints Row now could I? Move on typical means move on to the next thing. Or did you mean get past the previous games in the series?

People, you do realize that you can erase the names in the comment box if your response isn't meant for everyone, right?

@Cheekz77 @DrKill09 you mean GTA 3 right?

@Wizallah @timoteo2k1

"It's OK to not enjoy GTA for whatever reason but don't confuse your opinion as fact."

Then why did you just say I liked GTA IV? And before you say "no I didn't".......

"Your definition of "get better" seems to be different from everyone else's."

Will they get rid of stupid tailing missions where I already know the destination of the person I'm following is supposed to go? Do that, and I'll mail them a check tomorrow!