I wish you numb nuts would just STFU. I'm sure half u f^(#ers that pray to your ps3 wouldn't mind slapping a slogan on your foreheads that says " I'm a F#$%ing dumb@$$ and I'm proud of it" If someone told you it was high tech and it plays blu ray. For the sake of the species, you should all figure out how to jettison yourselves off our planet. We don't need you people infecting the gene pool with your flawed genetics.
Most of you people know zilch about the hardware in both these consoles. Some of you are just talking complete nonsense saying contrast or the disc allows the ps3 to have better graphics. Quit trying to sound like you know what your talking about. If you actually knew what you were talking about you'd be talking about proccessing power, RAM or how the video cards of both consoles compare, but no, your talking about contrast, discs and how the ps3 is just more "high tech and more expensive". Whats even more hilarious is that your giving ps3 credit for these pics when 360 clearly has the upperhand. Let me let you in on a little secret on comparing graphics. If a console has sharper textures, better anti-aliasing and higher or much more consistent framerate, that means we have a winner!(360)
Xbox wins again and theres no use in comparing them anymore because if ps3 was trully superior it would've shown in the pics. Still, funny thing is how some people are in complete denial thinkn ps3 is graphically superior, even seeing is not believing for these people, there opinions out weigh the facts.
I thought PS3 wouldve done better but maybe not. PC is the clear winner in graphics, but why are there some objects missing in the pictures. Xbox 360 definately beats out PS3 in graphics. BTW what are you people talking about saying PS3 has better textures than Xbox 360? Its pretty clear that PS3 has some blurry textures its not even a subtle difference in most of these pics.
You are truly lost Dark Phoenix........If you don't understand the difference between software and hardware I cannot counsel you any further. Your ideas are complete ludicrous.....and I checked out those exclusives you spoke of on my own system...and it wasn't mind blowing it was about the same if not worse.
Dark Phoenix, you are wrong on so many levels its hilarious. First off you can not fix the graphical inefficiencies of the PS3 with a patch or software thats just stupid, how many times must I grind this into your thick skull Phoenix the difference is through the hardware of both systems and you cannot fix PS3's hardware with a patch, secondly the difference between both consoles graphics wise is minuscule so the whole patch idea is really irrelevant. Also Dark Phoenix, developers no longer "copy and paste" to port one console version to another. They are now individually developed because as I said theres big differences between the Xenon and the Cell. In FACT, Unreal Tournament (EPIC) paved the way for PS3 game development, basically drawing a schematic or (for you Dark Phoenix "A ROAD MAP") for future developers to use when they port games so that there is less agony throughout the process. ONCE again I must reiterate to you Dark Phoenix, you cannot put a bunch of high resolution textures and other graphical tidbits on a blu ray and expect the PS3 to exceed its hardware limits. I hope this will eventually sink in Dark Phoenix.
Some of you people just don't get it. The wars over, while I like a lot of things about the PS3, the Xbox 360 is the clear winner in the graphics department, it always has been. While before the cell broadband was a tough adjustment for programmers, it is no longer, the adjustment has been made and both systems are reaching their full potential. The 360s' Xenon is now using all 3 of its 3.2 Ghz processors and the cell broadband is hitting its full potential. The fact is the cell broadband CONCEPT, I repeat the CONCEPT, is ahead of its time and just doesn't operate well enough to dethrone the 360. What it really has come down to mostly is which system can dish out higher texture resolutions. That's always going to favor the 360. The ATI graphics chip set in the 360 is not like the graphics card in your PC it's a highly intuitive design that ensures that the relationship between the GPU and CPU are balanced and efficient. On the other hand the PS3s' Graphics chip is much like the NVidia RTX, which is a nice card for a game based platform, however the relationship between the Cell and the GPU are a little offset which in turn can result in deficiencies in the Ps3 graphics compared to 360. To put it straight, there's no need to argue about it anymore it was over after the manufacturing of both consoles. Both consoles have unique qualities that makes them special in their own right. Lets just look forward to what the "next gen" will be able to do.
Mbrans25den's comments