TF2 is much more fun to play while at CS new players like me are dead all the time and have no fun. I play games to have fun not to watch other people play.
Europe has a much better policy when it comes to heath care. I rather pay more taxes and know if I get injuired or sick I will have free health care and I won't have to worry when I am sick about my finances putting further stress on your self and your family. In USA people are too greedy for money IMO that's why its sad too see the so called superpower and the richest country in the world don't offer it's citizens free health care. Health care should be the number 1 thing for every country and should most definitly be free.
Cause at the end of the day sooner or later we will all get seriosly sick and if you are lucky enough to recover from it, people in europe can go back to their normal life without losing anything, while in the USA without insurance you can be left on the street....
360 has a weak GPU and people who are claiming that it's nearly as powerful as 8800gtx are living in dream land. I can run COD4 with my old **** X1950pro 256MB and I can play it max out at 1280x720 with solid 60 fps. So since the 360 gpu is so much better wtf does it look like crap when playing it on the 360 compared to my PC.
The point is 360 gpu is weak and saying it's close to 8800gtx is a joke.
-GeordiLaForge-
*facepalm*... another person who didn't read before posting. I said that the ARCHITECTURE more closely resembles the 8800 series GPU's. I said nothing about the power...
*facepalm*....why u talking about architecture when the person who started the thread asked about POWER....
People it's 2009 use the internet to play with your friends. LAN feature is useless I have never used it and noone of my friends have ever used LAN. So I don't know what the big deal is about. Starcraft will offer great online service yet people are still complaing...
360 has a weak GPU and people who are claiming that it's nearly as powerful as 8800gtx are living in dream land. I can run COD4 with my old **** X1950pro 256MB and I can play it max out at 1280x720 with solid 60 fps. So since the 360 gpu is so much better wtf does it look like crap when playing it on the 360 compared to my PC.
The point is 360 gpu is weak and saying it's close to 8800gtx is a joke.
I prefer AMD. I dislike Intel cause they are way to expensive and whats with this crap i3, i5, i7.... How many freaking sockets do you need? Can't you keep it simple like AM3.
One socket should be enought, three is a joke IMO.
Plus who needs i7. Sure its a beast of a platform but what's the point since you hardly need this power, you are just paying more while AMD can provide pretty much the same experience. In general task you can't tell the difference between Intel/AMD so why pay more for crap you don't need?
IMO u should definitly get atleast a dual, single core CPU will strugle with everything. That E5200 will beat the pants of that P4 u got now.
As for the GPU, don't get 9400 cause its **** The minimum you want to get is HD 4670/9600gt if you want a decent performence when playing games. Personally I would got for 250gts or HD4850/4770. These three GPU will be able to play all the latest game quite easy and should future proff for about 2-3 years.
Epic owns Bungie. Srry but Epic atleast make more than one game. Unreal Tournament, Gears of War and Epic unreal engine have been popular since the stone age. What has bungie done, Halo sure it's an ok game but that's it one game.....
I have never played the starcraft franchase, so I don't know why everyone is making such a fuss about the game. To me it looks like just another average RTS game with weird units....
Log in to comment